Economy in Brief

The Clash! The U.S.-Iranian clash in the Middle East resulted in a closure of the Strait of Hormuz that collapsed the economy watchers index in Japan earlier this year. However, as the war-like conditions settled down and the two sides have moved toward some kind of cease fire or a more permanent arrangement, in the wake of that comparative tranquility, the economy watchers index improved, and its future index improved more sharply. These comments applied to the data in the table and conditions up to the end of June.

New day dawning... However, the data in the table are unrelated to what has happened in the past two days, when Iran took potshots at a couple of ships in the Strait, causing the U.S. to retaliate and President Trump to declare that the ceasefire has now ended. The door remains open for some kind of talks; however, the president’s recent remarks carried in the newspapers has clearly stated that the ceasefire has ended, and the U.S. intends to hit Iran and has suggested that it intends to hit it ‘hard.’ At the same time, Mr. Trump has said the door remains open to continuing talk and negotiations if both sides still want to get together; however, he admits he is not optimistic.

Precarious times and conditions So, these are precarious conditions. Oil prices have already responded and moved higher. We have Japan’s economic data for June showing some revival in the current index and some sharply higher revivals over the last few months in the future index. However, when the dust clears the queue standings of the current and future indexes are revealed, they are pretty similar, with the current index at a standing of 29.6% and the future index of 31.6%. Both the current and future readings coalesce around a 30-percentile standing, marking the two segments of the survey as usually stronger about 70% of the time which marks the latest readings as relatively weak. And that is before we take the new realities of July into account.

The current IS the future... There isn't too much point in talking about the two parts of the survey separately. The current and future surveys are simply not that different. This month, the lowest percentile standing in the current subindexes is housing, at an 11.5 percentile standing, followed by employment at a 17.8 percentile standing. In the future index, housing has an 11.1 percentile standing and employment has an 18.6 percentile standing; these readings are also the two lowest rankings in the future survey.

Sequential improvement is only point-to-point Over three months, we can see the point-to-point changes in the current index and some improvements in all of the components except housing. In the future index, the three-month changes show point-to-point improvements in all of the components. However, both surveys show point-to-point declines over six months and broad point-to-point declines over 12 months as well. Looking at the changes based on smooth data (shown at the bottom of the table), for the three-month averages compared to six-month averages and six-month averages compared to 12-month averages, conditions show no improvement. We see no improvements in the current or future indexes over three months or six months, and no improvement in the future index in the 12-month average compared to 12-month average of 12 months ago—although 40% of the components in the current index are improved over 12 months compared to 12 months ago.

German industrial production in May rose by 0.9% after rising by 0.2% in April. Top-line growth for industrial production shows an increase of 0.1% over 12 months, a decline of 0.2% over six months, but a revival with growth at a 4% annual rate over three months. The revival was led by consumer goods output, which gained 1.2% in May after rising 2.2% in April. Consumer goods output is lower by 0.1% over 12 months, rises at a 2.6% annual rate over six months, and again at an 8.6% annual rate over three months, marking an acceleration over this three-period sequence. Capital goods, however, an important sector in the German economy, continued to be erratic in May. Capital goods output rose by 1.3% in May after falling by more than 1% in each of the two previous months. Capital goods output is lower by 2.8% over 12 months, falling at an 8.6% annual rate over six months, and that drop is trimmed to a 4.4% contraction over three months.

The output of consumer goods is pushing industry production higher, but the output of capital goods is pulling industrial production back lower. Intermediate goods, however, are showing growth and acceleration, despite falling by 0.4% in May after increases in each of the two previous months. Nevertheless, intermediate goods output is up by 1.1% over 12 months; it accelerates from a 1.9% annual rate over six months to a 6.4% annual rate over three months.

Focusing on manufacturing output alone, there was a gain in output of 0.8% in May and a gain of 0.3% in April. However, manufacturing output is still lower by 0.6% over 12 months and falls at a 2.3% annual rate over six months before recovering a 2.2% annual rate gain over three months; nothing in this sequence is an impressive performance.

Real manufacturing orders have been oscillating back and forth, rising by 1.9% in May after falling 3.2% in April. However, over 12 months, real orders for manufactured goods are up 6.3%; yet that same series falls at a 4% annual rate over six months and then rebounds to surge ahead at a 12.8% annual rate over three months. That's an erratic performance, but with a good ending trend. Real sales in manufacturing show gains in each of the last three months, including a 1.8% month-over-month increase in May. Real sales in manufacturing rise to a 4.2% annual rate over six months and 12 months and then accelerate to a 12.4% annual rate over three months. The performance of sales is encouraging and fits well at least with the three-month spurt in real manufacturing orders.

Indicators for the German economy show that the ZEW current index weakened to -77.8 in May from -73.7 in April. The IFO manufacturing index moved higher, with the May reading of 86.7 compared to 86.3 in April. Manufacturing expectations in the IFO framework, however, weakened to 87.7 in May from 88.2 in April. The EU Commission industrial index registered -15.6 in May after -14.5 in April, another sign of weakening. Two of these four indexes weakened sequentially, looking at the values from 12 months to six months to three months; improvements were seen in the ZEW current index and the EU Commission index on this timeline.

Looking at manufacturing IP output data from select other European countries, France and Spain showed slippage in May compared to April, while Portugal posted a gain in May after a decline in April. Over 12 months, six months, and three months, France shows period-to-period positive growth, but growth is not gaining momentum. Spain shows an increase of 0.4% in output over 12 months, with slippage over six months and a solid gain over three months. In Portugal, output acceleration is in gear, with a 2.2% decline over 12 months shifting to a 6.7% annual rate gain over six months and a 10.6% annual rate gain over three months.

On a quarter-to-date (QTD) basis, German industrial production is rising for all the major sectors except for capital goods. Manufacturing output is rising QTD, along with real manufacturing orders and real sales in manufacturing. The industrial surveys for Germany all weaken QTD. Industrial production shows QTD declines for France and Spain, while Portugal posts a gain.

The ranking of year-over-year growth rates, or, for indicators, the ranking of the level compared to the past back to 2006, shows mostly weak performance for German output. There is a stronger assessment for the intermediate goods with a year-over-year growth rate ranking above the 50% rank, putting it above its historic median. Demand indicators, however, as reflected in real manufacturing orders and real sales for manufactured goods, have rankings in the 70th percentile, showing some better life for demand—that could bode well for output in the future. The industrial indicators, however, are all weak and substantially weak compared to their historic levels back to 2006.

On balance, the manufacturing and industrial data as well as surveys as of May for Germany and Europe show mixed results. There are a few pockets of strength; one of the bright spots is demand, but supply has not consistently responded to it yet. The industrial surveys are uniformly weak and definitely not a bright spot. Overall, the results are not reassuring.

The global PMI data for a select group of 24 countries and their composites, provided on the graph, indicate a slight overall improvement for the total PMIs in June, with the service sector getting slightly stronger as the manufacturing sector is slightly weaker.

Conditions, however, remain uneven. The overall average for the PMI composite in June moved up to 51.4 from 50.7 in May, but the May reading had fallen from 51 in April. The median rose to 50.8 in June from 50.2 in May, but it had been at 51.2 in April. There continues to be a great deal of weakness and irregularity in the progression of the global economy—not surprisingly with the recent data coming during the period when oil prices had surged in the Strait of Hormuz had been closed. We now are seeing different conditions in force, and we'll see how much improvement occurs in July if the current global situation remains improved.

In June, nine of twenty-four reporters had PMI readings below 50, indicating contraction in economic activity. In May, there had been ten such reporters, while in April there had been nine. These readings, of course, are less than half of the reporters; however, it's still a very large proportion of the reporters where the total PMI gauges are indicating economic contraction. Over three months, there are nine reporters with average readings below 50; over six months, there are only seven; and over 12 months, there are six. This progression tells us that the situation has been getting worse rather than better.

Based on monthly data, the European Monetary Union, Germany, France, Russia, Egypt, and Qatar each recorded three consecutive months of readings below 50, indicating contraction in each of those months. Sequentially, over 12 months, six months, and three months, only France, Russia, Ghana, Egypt, and Qatar show consistent readings that average below 50 (based on raw data).

The queue standings of the levels reported by countries in June show only seven with standings above the 50th percentile; this means there are only seven countries whose PMIs in June are higher than their average back to January 2022. Not surprisingly with the recent events really focused on oil prices and the situation in the Middle East and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, some of the weakest ranking readings are coming from oil producers in the Middle East such as Qatar (6.1%), the UAE (1.5%), Saudi Arabia (6.1%), and Egypt (18.2%). Clearly, the interruption of the oil flow and war damage has had an outsized impact on these data.

However, quite apart from the current situation and the closure of the Strait, if we calculate the average PMI standing rather than the ranking just the average of the PMI total sector ranking, there are four countries that have averaged readings below 50 based on monthly data back to January 2022. Those countries are France, Zambia, Egypt, and Kenya. The average readings across all countries back to January 2022 is a reading of 52.3. The highest ranking during this previous period is from India; its ranking is at 58.1. Ironically, some of the strongest readings in the earlier period come from oil producers whose current rankings are so low such as Saudi Arabia at 56.6, the UAE at 54.6, and Qatar at 53.4.

There has been upward momentum this month, particularly in services, while manufacturing backtracked. However, the trend to improve conditions is no longer so clear. What is clear is that the outlook is going to depend upon whatever peace agreement proves durable involving Iran and traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. This conclusion is not rocket-science; it is obvious. And it's going to take close-watching because there have been so many missteps around alleged ceasefires and treaty discussions that we can't be very sure about what's going to play out in the future and what will last.

In this week's Letter, we trace how an energy shock and a resilient AI upcycle shaped Asia through the first half of 2026 and weigh the risks that may define the second. The year opened hopeful on AI, though some feared stretched valuations, before the US-Iran conflict and a closed Strait of Hormuz shook the mood (chart 1). A later MoU eased energy prices and inflation fears, yet valuations largely held on AI optimism, despite bouts of reassessment. The oil surge hit import-reliant emerging Asia hardest, leaving India, Thailand and the Philippines doubly exposed through their Middle East sourcing (chart 2). Pass-through inflation, subsidies that some governments later pared back, and currency pressure followed, though resuming Strait traffic should ease these strains. Rising inflation then boxed in policymakers, straining already-stretched fiscal positions and limiting more pro-growth monetary policy stances in some economies (chart 3). Our latest Blue Chip survey found a slim majority reassessed the risk balance after oil fell, though the shifts stayed mild versus the June survey (chart 4). Most still rank upside inflation risk above downside employment risk, even as a slightly larger share now see the balance as more even. AI remains the region's key offset, with Taiwan and South Korea riding a sharp rise in memory and chip exports (chart 5). Malaysia and Thailand instead draw data centre FDI, so Asia gains from the buildout phase rather than the West's hoped-for productivity gains. We close on an uncertain second half, where a possible Super El Niño could revive food-driven inflation even as energy pressures fade (chart 6). Beyond that, an AI reassessment, fresh geopolitical flashpoints, trade tensions and the US midterms could each reshape the outlook.

The year thus far We began the year on a relatively hopeful note, buoyed by AI optimism and market valuations that reflected it, although some investors worried that valuations had become overstretched. The geopolitical mood shifted quickly in early January, however, when US military forces captured former Venezuelan leader Maduro, though the event did little to move markets (chart 1). A far greater shock came when the US-Iran conflict erupted in late February, closing the Strait of Hormuz and dealing a negative blow to global energy supplies. More recently, the US and Iran have reached a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) aimed at ceasing hostilities and resuming trade flows through the Strait. This has allowed energy prices to ease, softening policymakers' concerns about energy-driven inflation. Even so, equity valuations have largely remained underpinned by AI optimism, albeit with interim bouts of reassessment and price retracement. This drew on repeated reports of strong growth along the AI supply chain, and on signs that supply could not keep pace with demand. This continued even as AI models with leapfrogging capabilities reached the public. At several points, the US government stepped in to rein in public access to some models, given security concerns about such immense capabilities falling into the wrong hands.