Haver’s data services are provided through the DLX platform; delivering tools for data management, visualization, modeling and publishing. DLX is designed to increase productivity and integrates with Excel, PowerPoint, and major statistical software packages; MatLab, R, Python, SAS, E-views and Stata. DLX component application DLXVG3 offers precision graphics, publishing, analytic tools, and easy navigation for all Haver databases.

icon-chart.png

Chart and compare multiple data series with accompanying data table of values

Advanced functions (growth rates, moving averages, aggregation, seasonal adjustment)

Analytical tools (cycle charts, scatterplots, trend lines, and recession shading)

Complete graph customization (axis scaling, sizing, formatting, styles)

Excel and PowerPoint direct export and complete integration (dynamic spreadsheets and presentations update on a click)

DLXVG3

icon-db.png

DLX Add-ins for all versions of Excel provide instant data updates of entire workbooks

Use DLXVG3 to locate data series codes from within any file, easily creating new spreadsheets for analysis

Edit date ranges, archive data, apply functions

Excel Spreadsheet Add-ins

icon-time.png

Haver offers timely, accurate, and professionally supported data via an update service, meeting the strictest demands of the institutional research community

AutoUpdate provides fast and reliable data updates within seconds of source releases

Timer service runs continuously on an hourly basis when DLX is running

Manual updates offer clients the independence to update data retrievals on any desired schedule

All database updates retrieve only the data series that have changed and send only the data points that have been updated; including revisions

Timely Updates

DLX software tools to convert data into many different formats needed for diverse analytical frameworks

Haver supports a DLX API permitting clients to leverage and build processes with DLX data

Database Compatibility

products-dlx.svg

Data Link Express

Platform Independent site delivering DLX Databases across any workstation or device.

products-haverview.svg

HaverView

[Matlab](http://matlab.com) by The MathWorks lets you access, visualize, and analyze historic time-series data to identify patterns or uncover complex relationships. From within a single environment you can:

- Access data from multiple sources including files, spreadsheets, databases, data providers, and the Web
- Store data in financial time-series objects to simplify data management, data transformation, missing-data handling, and date-math calculations
- Perform technical analysis with moving averages, oscillators, stochastics, and indices
- Create custom analysis routines and visualizations or animations to capture, present, and share your analysis processes and discoveries
- Customize your analysis environment with advanced functionality from signal processing, statistics, or econometrics

products-matlab.svg

MATLAB

[Stata Data Analysis and Statistical Software](https://www.stata.com) by StataCorp LP is an integrated statistical package designed for researchers of all disciplines. It provides the ability to do data analysis, data management and graphics and has features such as multiple imputation, factor variables, GMM, competing-risks regression, state-space modeling, predictive margins, and more.

products-stata.svg

Stata

[SAS](https://www.sas.com) provides an integrated environment for predictive and descriptive modeling, data mining, text analytics, forecasting, optimization, simulation, experimental design and more. From predictive analytics to model deployment and process optimization, SAS provides a range of techniques and processes for the collection, classification, analysis and interpretation of data to reveal patterns, anomalies, key variables and relationships, leading ultimately to new insights and better answers faster.

[SASEHAVR](http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/etsug/67525/HTML/default/viewer.htm#etsug_sasehavr_gettingstarted01.htm) is a seamless interface between Haver and SAS data processing that enables SAS users to read economic and financial time series data that reside in a Haver Analytics DLX (Data Link Express) database. [SASEHAVR](http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/etsug/67525/HTML/default/viewer.htm#etsug_sasehavr_gettingstarted01.htm) requires both SAS/ETS and Base SAS Software.

products-sas.svg

[RATS (Regression Analysis of Time Series) Econometric Software](https://estima.com) by Estima is a leading econometrics and time-series analysis software package. It provides ability to do linear and non-linear least squares, forecasting, SUR and ARIMA models and in addition, supports advanced techniques such as GMM, ARCH and GARCH models, state space models, and more.

products-rats.svg

RATS

Session 1: Bootcamp Part 1

Visualization with GGPlot2 and data analysis

Session 2: Bootcamp Part 2

Session 3: Univariate Models Part 1

Session 4: Univariate Models Part 2

Session 5: Vector Autoregressions

Session 6: Cointegration and error-correction models

A popular open source option for statistical computing and graphics that is available on many UNIX platforms, Windows and MacOS

Estimating, evaluating, and forecasting ARIMA models

Understanding the concept of non-stationarity and testing for unit roots

Estimating autoregressions, granger causality tests, and impulse response functions

Understanding the concept of cointegration and testing using the Enger-Granger test

Estimating and forecasting with vector error correction models

products-r.svg

Teaches econometrics and forecasting at the University of Colorado Denver. He has over 15 years of econometric experience in both the private and public sector.

Daniel L. Jerrett, Ph.D.

Abdel M. Zellou, Ph.D.

Bootcamp and Econometric Tools 1 & 2

Econometrics Training: Applied Time Series in R

Session 5: Multivariate Models Part 1

Session 6: Multivariate Models Part 2

Haver partners with SmartMacro Labs to offer a two week immersive online course introducing participants to the power of the Python programming language. This applied hands-on training develops statistical economics skills with a concentration on economics and finance.

Gain proficiency in building modern time-series models in Python through real-world applications. Designed for professionals in both the public and private sector, the course does not require prior experience, assuming only that participants have a basic understanding of regression and statistical concepts.

Proficiency working in Jupyter notebooks and the Python environment

products-python.svg

Remote Training: Applied Time Series in Python

Rising US long-term real yields point to strong demand for investment funding

Kathleen Stephansen, CBE

260729A1.jpg

260729B1.jpg

Mortgage applications dropped 6.4% w/w (+0.6% y/y) in the week ending July 24, after rising 1.9% w/w (3.3% y/y) in the week ending July 17, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey. Applications for loans to purchase a house declined 3.6% w/w (+2.7% y/y) in the latest week, after rising 5.5% w/w (0.4% y/y) in the July 17 week.  Applications for loan refinancing plummeted another 9.9% w/w (-2.2% y/y) in the July 24 week, following a decline of 2.4% w/w (+7.3% y/y) in the week ending July 17.

The effective interest rate on a 30-year fixed-rate loan rose 9bps to 6.96% in the week ending July 24 from 6.87% in the week ending July 17. The rate on 15-year fixed-rate mortgages rose 10bps to 6.36% in the July 24 week from 6.26% in the July 17 week. The 30-year Jumbo rate jumped 28bps to 6.85% in the latest week after dropping 20bps to 6.57% in the July 17 week. The rate on a 5-year ARM rose 6bps to 6.44% in the July 24 week from 6.38% in the July 17 week.

The share of applications for refinancing an existing loan declined to 39.5% of total applications in the week of July 24 from 41.2% in the July 17 week. The adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) share of activity rose to 8.1% in the July 24 week from 7.7% in the July 17 week.

The average size of a mortgage edged up 0.3% w/w (2.8% y/y) to $384,700 in the week of July 24, after rising 1.1% w/w to $383,700 in the week ending July 17. The average size of a purchase loan edged up 0.4% w/w (3.8% y/y) to $445,400 in the July 24 week, after rising 0.4% w/w to $443,800 in the July 17 week. The average size of a loan to refinance a mortgage declined 2.0% w/w (-0.9% y/y) to $291,800 in the week ended July 24, following a small rise of 0.2% w/w to $297,900 in the week ending July 17. 

The Mortgage Bankers Association Survey covers 75% of all U.S. retail residential mortgage applications and has been conducted weekly since 1990. Respondents include mortgage bankers, commercial banks and thrifts. The base period and value for all indexes is March 16, 1990=100. The figures for weekly mortgage applications and interest rates are available in Haver’s **SURVEYS** database.

- Both applications for loans to purchase and applications for loan refinancing declined in the latest week.
- Interest rate on 30-year fixed-rate loans rose 9bps to 6.96%. 
- Average loan size edged up.

U.S. Mortgage Applications Declined in the July 24 Week

Sandy Batten

260728N0.jpg

260728O0.jpg

The Conference Board’s index of Consumer Confidence fell 1.4 points to 90.8 in July from an upwardly revised 92.2 in June (previously 91.2). The overall index has generally trended down from a reading of 112.8 in November 2024. The Action Economics Forecast Survey looked for a reading of 92.3 in July. The July decline was due entirely to a gloomier view of present conditions. The Present Situation index fell to 114.9 in July from 118.5 in June, the third consecutive monthly decline and the lowest reading since February 2021. By contrast, the Expectations index was unchanged at 74.7. The survey period for today’s report was July 1-22.

The pessimism over the state of the economy was markedly larger in the under 35 years age group with confidence dropping to 100.7 in July, the lowest reading since January 2021, from 114.1 in June. Confidence also fell in the over 55 years age group, but by much less, slipping to 76.8 from 79.7. By contrast, confidence in the 35-55 years age group jumped up to 97.6 from 90.4 in June, the highest reading since last October.

Notwithstanding the breakdown of the Memorandum of Understanding between the US and Iran during July, inflation expectations for the year ahead fell for the third consecutive month to 4.5% in July from 4.9% in June and 5.3% in April, which had reflected the initial escalation of the US-Iran conflict. Inflation expectations had soared to a recent high of 5.9% in April 2025 after significant tariff increases were announced. Prior to the pandemic, inflation expectations were generally around 4%.

Assessment of labor market conditions softened further in July as indicated by a further decline in the labor market differential (the percentage of respondents who think that jobs are plentiful minus the percentage who think that jobs are hard to get). Respondents still have a slightly favorable view of the labor market as the percentage thinking jobs are plentiful (24.6%) still exceeds the percentage thinking that jobs are hard to get (21.5%). However, that differential slumped to 3.1% in July from 3.8% in June and 5.0% in May. This was the lowest reading since February 2021. The correlation between the labor market differential and the BLS’s unemployment rate over the past 15 years has been -0.78. Thus, the recent decline in the labor market differential points to increases in the overall unemployment rate.

Respondents generally felt that business conditions had deteriorated in July with the percentage considering conditions to be good falling to 18.9% from 20.2% in June while the percentage considering conditions to be bad increasing to 17.8% from 16.5% in June. Furthermore, the respondents expressed similar feelings about the coming six months with the percentage expecting business conditions to improve falling to 17.8% from 18.9% in June while the percentage expecting conditions to worsen rose to 21.1% from 20.7%.

The Consumer Confidence data are available in Haver’s **CBDB** database. The total indexes, which are indexed to 1985=100, appear in **USECON**, and market expectations are in **AS1REPNA**.

260728P0.jpg

260728Q0.jpg

- The Conference Board’s measure of consumer confidence fell to 90.8 in July from 92.2 in June, continuing its downtrend since early last year.
- The Present Situation index fell to 114.9, its lowest reading since February 2021. The Expectations index was unchanged at 74.7.
- Inflation expectations one year ahead fell to 4.5% in July from 4.9%.
- The labor market differential fell to 3.1% in July, its lowest level since February 2021, from 3.8%, pointing to further softening of labor market conditions.

U.S. Consumer Confidence Continues Downtrend in July

Winnie Tapasanun

260728H9.jpg

260728I9.jpg

The U.S. international trade deficit in goods narrowed to a larger-than-expected $101.46 billion in June after widening to $105.89 billion in May (the largest since March 2025), according to the advance estimate from the U.S. Census Bureau. The June reading marked the second narrowing in the goods trade deficit in three months, still exceeding an $84.17 billion shortfall in June 2025. A deficit of $99.0 billion for June had been expected by the Action Economics Forecast Survey. The deficit reached a low of $61.44 billion in October 2025 (the smallest since February 2020) and a record high of $158.73 billion in March 2025. On a quarterly basis, the deficit averaged $96.53 billion in Q2'26, the largest since Q1'25, versus $81.96 billion in Q1'26.

Total goods exports declined 1.8% m/m (+14.8% y/y) to $204.70 billion in June, the lowest level since January, following a 5.3% drop to $208.50 billion in May and a 4.1% gain to a record-high $220.11 billion in April. However, exports were up 25.9% from a June 2023 low. The m/m decline in exports in June reflected drops of 4.4% (+31.3% y/y) in industrial supplies & materials, 3.1% (+11.5% y/y) in foods, feeds & beverages, 2.8% (+12.3% y/y) in other goods, and 1.1% (+10.9% y/y) in capital goods excluding autos. To the upside, exports of automotive vehicles & parts (+5.1%; -0.5% y/y) and nonfood consumer goods excluding autos (+3.2%; -7.2% y/y) rose m/m in June.

Total goods imports fell 2.6% m/m (+16.6% y/y) to $306.17 billion in June, the first monthly fall since January, after a 4.0% rise to $314.40 billion in May (the highest level since the March 2025 record high of $340.11 billion). Nevertheless, imports were up 22.1% from a March 2023 low. The m/m fall in imports in June was broad-based across all end-use categories, led by a 6.3% drop (+16.3% y/y) in other goods, followed by declines of 3.8% (-0.3% y/y) in nonfood consumer goods excluding autos, 2.5% (+1.9% y/y) in automotive vehicles & parts, 2.5% (-1.3% y/y) in foods, feeds & beverages, 2.0% (+37.4% y/y) in capital goods excluding autos, and 1.9% (+15.0% y/y) in industrial supplies & materials.

The advance international trade data can be found in Haver's **USECON** database. The expectation figure is from the Action Economics Forecast Survey, which is in **AS1REPNA**.

- Deficit: $101.46 bil. in June, down $4.43 bil. (-4.2%) from May’s $105.89 bil.
- Exports -1.8%, second straight m/m decline to a five-month low, driven by a 4.4% drop in exports of industrial supplies & materials.
- Imports -2.6%, first m/m decrease since Jan., w/ all end-use import categories down, led by drops of 6.3% in other goods and 3.8% in nonauto consumer goods.

U.S. Goods Trade Deficit Narrows in June from May’s 14-Month High

Robert Brusca

260728E.jpg

Household confidence in France improved in July, rising to 86.4 from 84.3 in June. Confidence was last higher in March, and the average for confidence over the last 12 months is 87.7. The July value, despite its climb, is still below that average; confidence is still weak in a historic context. According to data back to 2001, the current confidence metric in July has a 16.2 percentile ranking, an extremely weak reading. The mean of confidence readings back to 2001 is 95.1. The July reading is nearly nine points below that.

**Weak but improved living standards readings**: Living standards in July improved slightly compared to June. The assessment of the last 12 months is -79 compared to -81 previously. However, the 12-month average is a rating of -74; the July reading is still short of that. Looking to the next 12 months, living standards are expected to improve; the reading of -59 in July compares to -65 logged a month ago. It compares to a 12-month average of -61. The expectation for living standards over the next 12 months is higher than it has been on average for the last 12 months, although the reading itself is still quite weak. The standing in its 10th percentile for a current rating at -59 is below its full-period average of -38.

**Fewer unemployment worries**: Unemployment over the next 12 months is expected to be less of a concern, but the reading in July drops to 55 from 61 in June; however, the July reading is still above the 12-month average of 52. The ranking for unemployment concerns has a 72nd percentile standing, putting it in the top third of its historic range of readings.

**Inflation fears drop, comparatively**: Price developments show that over the past 12 months inflation has been a concern, with the July reading falling relative to June to 17 from 22, but this reading is much higher than its 12-month average of +2. However, looking to the next 12 months, the July reading is -33 compared to -15 in June, and it compares to -20 on average over the last 12 months. Inflation expectations are for conditions to show weaker inflation pressures. The ranking of the July reading is at its 44th percentile, below its historic median; the medians on rankings occur at a ranking of 50. Of course, all these readings will be dependent on how oil prices evolve.

**Saving/spending**: Both the favorability and the ability to save improved in July compared to June; both readings in July are above their respective 12-month averages. The rankings of these observations are around their high 90th percentiles; for the favorability to save, the reading is the highest in the whole period back to June 2001. The ability to save is often not a good reading but rather one that reflects consumer defensiveness, and we see that as we move to the next metric, the favorability to make a major purchase. In July, that reading improved to -36 from -38 in June, but it's weaker than its 12-month average of -31.8. In historic context, it's extremely weak and has an 8.3 percentile standing. So, the favorability to make a major purchase is in the lower 10th percentile of all monthly observations back to June 2001, indicating considerable consumer defensiveness.

**Financial situation**: The financial situations over the past 12 months and projected over the next 12 months show slightly improved readings compared to June. The past 12 months reading is weaker than its 12-month average, while the expectation for the next 12 months is the same as its 12-month average. The rankings of the two financial situations are just below their respective 40th percentiles, placing them about 10 percentile points below their historic medians.

**Summing up**
The consumer in France sees some improvement in July, and conditions remain mixed across these various components. But most of the rankings for the components are quite weak, with the exception being concerns about unemployment and the favorability to save, which was a defensive reading. The weighting scheme for this survey gives us a slightly more positive read on the month, but it's clear that the French consumers are still concerned about economic conditions and the future.

260728.jpg

France

French Household Confidence Improves

260727V35.jpg

260727W35.jpg

New orders for durable goods increased a weaker-than-expected 0.3% m/m in June, the third monthly gain in four months, following an upwardly revised 4.0% decline in May (-4.5% initially) and an 8.5% advance in April (unrevised), according to today’s advance report from the U.S. Census Bureau. The Action Economics Forecast Survey had expected a 2.1% m/m June increase. The year-on-year rate accelerated to +7.4% in June from -3.0% in May (+10.9% in June 2025), remaining positive since January 2025 except for May. Excluding transportation, durable goods orders rose 0.6% (11.0% y/y) in June, the 14th straight m/m rise, after a 1.8% increase in May. Durable goods orders excluding defense grew 0.3% (5.7% y/y) following a 4.3% May drop.

The m/m increase in June durable goods orders was driven by a 3.7% m/m rebound in orders for nondefense aircraft & parts, following a 51.1% plunge in May and a 167.4% surge in April. Orders for defense aircraft & parts fell 7.2% (+46.8% y/y), the first m/m decline since January, after gains of 8.9% in May and 2.4% in April. Orders excluding aircraft climbed 0.3% (11.0% y/y), the seventh consecutive m/m rise and the 11th in 12 months, on top of a 1.4% May increase.

Durable goods orders for transportation declined 0.2% (+1.1% y/y) in June following a 13.5% drop in May and two successive m/m gains. In addition to June’s m/m rebound in nondefense aircraft orders and decline in defense aircraft orders, motor vehicles & parts orders slid 0.6% (+10.3% y/y), the first m/m slide since November, after a 1.1% May increase. Orders for computers & electronic products advanced 3.1% (16.7% y/y), the ninth m/m gain in 10 months, building on a 1.2% May rebound. Orders for primary metals rose 1.1% (17.6% y/y), the seventh straight m/m increase, after a 4.2% May gain. Orders for electrical equipment, appliances & components rose 0.9% (6.7% y/y), the fourth consecutive m/m rise, following a 0.2% May increase. Orders for all other durable goods grew 0.2% (3.4% y/y), the 10th straight m/m gain, after a 0.7% May rise. Meanwhile, orders for fabricated metal products fell 0.5% (+10.6% y/y) in June after two successive m/m increases. Machinery orders dipped 0.1% (+14.4% y/y), the first m/m easing since February 2025, following a 2.8% May gain.

Capital goods orders rebounded 1.1% (3.8% y/y) in June, the third m/m rise in four months, following a 13.0% decrease in May. Nondefense capital goods orders rose 1.2% (-1.1% y/y), the second m/m gain in three months, after a 15.3% May drop. Core capital goods orders (i.e., nondefense capital goods orders excluding aircraft) rose 0.9% (12.5% y/y), the fourth m/m gain in five months, following a 1.9% May recovery. Defense capital goods orders increased 0.5% (31.6% y/y), up for the fourth time in five months, after a 1.6% May decline. Notably, core capital goods shipments (core capex shipments)—a reliable coincident indicator of business spending on equipment in the national accounts—rose 1.9% (9.3% y/y), the ninth m/m rise in 10 months, after a 0.2% May increase.

Shipments of all manufactured goods fell 0.3% (+8.0% y/y) in June, the first m/m fall since November, following a 1.6% gain in May. Durable goods shipments rose 0.7% (9.0% y/y), the seventh straight m/m rise, after a 1.1% May increase. Nondurable goods shipments declined 1.3% (+7.0% y/y), the first m/m decrease in seven months, following a 2.1% May gain.

Unfilled orders of durable goods increased 0.6% (8.2% y/y) in June after a 0.7% rise in May. Excluding transportation, unfilled orders rose 0.9% (5.3% y/y) following a 1.0% May advance. Both series posted the 11th consecutive m/m increase.

Manufacturing inventories edged up 0.1% (1.8% y/y) in June, the eighth successive m/m gain, after a 0.2% rise in May. Durable goods inventories grew 0.3% (2.2% y/y), the ninth straight m/m increase, after a 0.1% uptick in May. Nondurable goods inventories, however, fell 0.3% (+1.1% y/y), the first m/m decline since January, after rising 0.4% in May and April.

Manufacturers’ orders and shipments of durable and nondurable goods, along with unfilled orders and inventories, are compiled by the U.S. Census Bureau. They are available in Haver’s **USECON** database. The Action Economics forecast data are in the **AS1REPNA** database.

260727X35.jpg

260727Y35.jpg

- June headline orders +0.3% m/m, third rise in four mths.; +7.4% y/y, positive since Jan. ’25 except for May (-3.0%).
- Nondefense aircraft & parts +3.7% m/m vs. May’s -51.1%; defense aircraft & parts -7.2% m/m, first drop since Jan.
- Transportation orders -0.2%, second consecutive m/m decline; orders ex transp. +0.6%, 14th straight m/m gain.
- Computers & electronic products +3.1%, ninth increase in 10 mths.
- Core capital goods shipments +1.9%, ninth gain in 10 mths., pointing to a moderate contribution to Q2’26 GDP from business equipt. spending.
- Durable goods shipments +0.7%; unfilled orders +0.6%; inventories +0.3%.

U.S. Durable Goods Orders Rebound Less Than Expected in June

260727E.jpg

**Money works with a lag but sometimes it’s reported with a lag too**: U.S. and U.K. money supply data lag the results for the monetary union and for Japan by one month. Monetary trends currently based on the most up-to-date data, which are either May or June depending on the country we're looking at, show that three-month money supply growth, and credit growth in the case of the monetary union, have slowed compared to six months, except in the case of Japan. In Japan, for the six-month and three-month growth rates are identical at 1.9% overall; growth rates are lower over three months and six months compared to 12 months.

**Real money balances**: The growth rate of real money balances shows the step-down in growth in the monetary union from 1.6% over 12 months to a 1% annual rate over six months to a 0.6% annual rate over three months. Over the same sequence of dates, private credit in the monetary union has gone from 1.2% over 12 months to a pace of 1.4% over six months, and then down to 1.1% over three months. In the U.S., money growth over this period has decelerated from 2.5% over 12 months to 2% at an annual rate over six months to -0.4% over three months annualized. The U.K. shows a slightly different pattern for real money balances that grow 2.4% over 12 months, accelerate to 3.4% annually over six months, but then back down to a 1.6% annual rate over three months, showing a net deceleration from 12 months to three months but with an intervening bulge. In Japan, the money growth slowdown is monotonic, from 0.5% over 12 months to a 0.3% pace over six months to a -1.2% pace over three months.

**Pattern reversal**: Nominal money growth, which had shown some acceleration early in the year, is now beginning to show deceleration, and this is before central banks have generally begun to raise rates, although there have been ongoing rate increases of a slight amount in Japan and also the start of a tightening cycle in the European Monetary Union. In the U.S., there's a new head of the central bank and policies there are expected to shift, but the jury is out on what to expect, as is often the case with a new chairman. There are a variety of views on what he plans to do; he will most likely make his reputation by what he in fact does rather than by what he says about what he intends to do. On balance, growths in the U.S., the monetary union, and Japan are all showing deceleration with a slight exception from the U.K. But generally speaking, money supply no longer is showing a moderate disturbing acceleration pattern; in real terms, money growth has lost a great deal of steam, particularly in the U.S. and Japan, where three-month growth rates of real money balances are declining and show negative rates of growth.

**Summing up**
These are new trends, and they are not much talked about in markets because markets don't speak the language of money supply growth much anymore. However, it's a good idea to continue to look at money supply and what it does. Just because central banks aren't targeting money doesn't mean that it isn't relevant anymore; it just means that central banks have put their attention someplace else. At present, central bankers seem to be arguing about where their attention should be. It could be a good time for us to keep close tabs on what money supply is doing.

260727.jpg

An Update on Withering Money Growth Metrics

Tian Yong Woon

In this week's Letter, we trace three threats converging on Asia's inflation outlook. The first is renewed US tariffs, with the latest salvo of duties imposed over alleged forced labour issues. That move is widely seen as a replacement for the now-expired Section 122 tariffs, with only mild incremental effects from the new Section 301 duties. Set against that, the US effective tariff rate has pulled back from its 2025 highs in recent months (chart 1). The second is the Strait of Hormuz, where the re-escalation of US-Iran tensions has once again reduced shipping volumes to a trickle. Crude oil prices have been driven up as a result (chart 2). It could have been worse, were it not for China's sharply reduced crude imports over the period (chart 3). Arguably, though, at least part of that reduced intake simply reflected the absence of supply from the Strait. The third is the ongoing El Niño event, which several authorities have warned will likely be the largest on record (chart 4). It risks disrupting food crop yields, among other effects, channelling a price shock through food supply. Together these pressures threaten to upend the pullback in commodity inflation seen in recent months (chart 5), once again complicating policymaking. As an aside, we also explore economy-specific political developments that are brewing or could become an issue further down the road. One is the recent resignation of Indonesia's central bank governor, which came amid protracted rupiah weakness (chart 6) and concerns about fiscal health.

**Tariff trouble**
Recent US forced labour tariffs have revived concerns, pushing the tariff theme back to the fore. The US imposed additional Section 301 duties of 10% or 12.5% on imports from 60 investigated economies, effective 24 July 2026. These followed USTR investigations into those economies' failure to impose and enforce prohibitions on goods produced with forced labour. They took effect the same day the temporary 10% Section 122 global surcharge expired by statute, and are seen as its replacement. Yet overall US effective tariff rates, calculated as duty as a percentage of the respective dutiable value, have pulled back significantly from their 2025 highs (chart 1). That retreat began with the numerous bilateral trade deals the US eventually struck with many of its trading partners. It went further in February, when the Supreme Court struck down President Trump's tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). That ruling dented the overall impact of US tariffs on its trading partners, with possible tariff refunds still in the works. Cutting the other way, the Section 122 surcharge had partially raised overall rates while it ran. Even so, some estimates suggest the new duties will only marginally increase US effective tariff rates on its trading partners.



260727T1.jpg

**Strait trouble**
Tariff concerns have not resurged in isolation. Worries about the US-Iran conflict have returned alongside them, along with their consequences for shipping flows and crude oil prices. Those flows are the starting point, and shipping volumes through the Strait of Hormuz have tumbled once more, reduced again to a trickle (chart 2). Crude prices have followed, surging towards their post-conflict highs, with Brent flirting with $100/bbl. Against that, some interim reprieve may have come from the pause in strikes between the US and Iran, which followed 13 straight nights of US attacks. A pause is not a reopening, however, and the key metric remains the flow of goods, and especially energy, through the Strait. Those flows have not yet recovered to anywhere near pre-crisis levels. Resolving them is what the talks now under way between Oman and Iran are meant to address.

260727T2.jpg

A less appreciated point amid the US-Iran flare-up and the subsequent surge in oil prices is that it could have been considerably worse. One reason concerns China, whose crude oil imports fell sharply after the conflict broke out (chart 3). That absence of demand was partly involuntary, since little crude was flowing through the Strait in any case. Even so, it likely alleviated much of the price surge that would otherwise have occurred. Over the same period, China's exports of refined petroleum products also tumbled. That decline was driven by the authorities' fuel export restrictions, imposed in March soon after the conflict began. Those restrictions were largely lifted only recently, after the US and Iran reached a ceasefire and the Strait reopened. Now that the situation has escalated again, how long the lifting holds remains to be seen. The broader question is how long China can sustain such sharply reduced crude imports. That turns on the size of the reserves it can draw upon, and those figures are undisclosed, with external estimates carrying wide uncertainty.

260727T3.jpg

**Climate trouble**
Adding to investor and policymaker concerns is the ongoing El Niño event, which has already formed. Recent Southern Oscillation Index readings offer one line of evidence (chart 4). Agencies such as the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) have confirmed the event separately. Many authorities warn that this year's event is set to be the largest on record. That points to more severe effects than previously seen, from sharply higher global temperatures to flooding and landslides. Crop yields would be among the casualties, and the resulting disruption ultimately amounts to economic losses. Those losses look unlikely to be confined to 2026, since the current Super El Niño is expected to stretch well into next year.

260727T4.jpg

**Converging on inflation**
Bringing it all together, three pressures now converge on the inflation outlook. First is a resurgent oil price shock from renewed US-Iran tensions. Layered on top are the potential knock-on effects from the Super El Niño pattern, which run through food crop yields and subsequently food prices. Renewed US tariffs add a third, milder push. Together they threaten to upend the pullback in commodity inflation seen in recent months (chart 5), once again complicating policymaking. That threat has further to run, since the worst of the El Niño price surge may not yet have materialised in full. Should the oil shock persist or worsen alongside it, price pressures would likely be pushed sharply upward. All of this lands on Asian economies already clinging to what few drivers of growth remain, such as the ongoing AI upcycle, while a slew of domestic issues weighs from within.

260727T5.jpg

**Political troubles?**
Finally and as an aside, we also explore other economy-specific developments that have been brewing or threaten to evolve into an issue further down the road. These troubles sit on the political front and have, so far, remained contained within their respective economies. Indonesia offers the first case, where central bank governor Perry Warjiyo resigned citing personal reasons, adding a layer of uncertainty. The timing sharpens it, with the rupiah already under protracted weakness (chart 6). Compounding that, Indonesia's President continues to pursue loose fiscal policy in an attempt to boost growth. Japan presents a different kind of pressure, with Prime Minister Takaichi's cabinet approval rating diving 10pp in the latest Nikkei and TV Tokyo poll. That took it below 60% for the first time since she took office last October, with perceived reasons for the decline varying. The resulting 58% rating is still comparatively high by historical standards. Even so, an extended slide from here could spell deeper underlying perception issues.

260727T6.jpg

Asia

Economic Letter from Asia: Triple Threat

Michael J. Moran

260724A.jpg

260724B.jpg

Sales of new homes rose 1.6% in June, and results in the prior three months were revised upward by a combined 2.8%. The results were favorable when viewed in isolation, but they still left the performance so far this year lagging that in the prior three years. Annual sales from 2023 to 2025 averaged 676,000 units; the average annual rate so far this year has totaled 626,000 (chart, upper left).

Not only are results this year lagging those of the prior three years, but they are light relative to the experience in the 1990s (a period not affected by the inflating and bursting of a housing bubble, and one not influenced by a pandemic). New home sales in the latter portion of that decade topped 800,000. With the number of households now much larger than at that time (133 million versus approximately 100 million), one might expect current sales to be at least as firm as in that earlier period.

Developments in the existing home market also would lead one to expect strong results in the new home market. Many homeowners with low-rate mortgages have postponed or cancelled plans to move in order to retain their attractive financing. This has led to a dearth of existing homes for sale and pushed activity to a dreadfully low level – the lowest since the trough that followed the bursting of the housing bubble (chart, upper right). Aspiring homeowners could turn to the new home market to satisfy their demand, but uninspiring sales of new homes suggest that such shifts have not been pronounced.

The supply of new homes on the market does not seem to be a factor in restraining activity, as the number of homes for sale is in the upper reaches of the historical experience. The number of listings at the peak of the housing bubble in 2006 was notably larger, but otherwise, observations in the past year exceed previous results by a sizeable margin (chart, lower left). The months’ supply of homes (the length of time to clear inventory at the current sales pace) also is in the upper portion of its historical range.

Soft demand seems to explain recent results, with affordability being the key consideration. The housing affordability index published by the National Association of Realtors has moved to the low portion of its historical range. Indeed, the only time with lower readings was in the late 1970s and 1980s, when double-digit mortgage rates pushed the measure to its record low (chart, lower right). With housing costs joining other financial challenges (health care, child care, education), housing activity is lacking vigor.

New home sales are recorded when the sales contract is signed. New home sales activity and prices are available in Haver's **USECON** database. The consensus expectation figure from Action Economics is available in the **AS1REPNA** database.

260724C.jpg

260724D.jpg

- Respectable advance in the latest month…
- …and net upward revisions in the prior three months
- …but still trailing results in the prior three months

New Home Sales: Improvement in June, but a Still-Soft Performance

Jonathan Basile

large_260731F4.jpg

medium_260731F4.jpg

small_260731F4.jpg

thumbnail_260731F4.jpg

260731F4.jpg

large_260731G4.jpg

medium_260731G4.jpg

small_260731G4.jpg

thumbnail_260731G4.jpg

260731G4.jpg

The U.S. Employment Cost Index (ECI) expanded at a steady 0.9% rate in the three months ended June, the same quarterly pace as in the first quarter. On a year-over-year (YoY) basis, compensation costs have been running at the same 3.4% figure for three consecutive quarters. This kind of three-quarter stability is unusual for a cyclical indicator, happening just 5% of the time since the 1982 inception of the series. A deeper dive beneath the headline number reveals opposing paths for wages and benefits.

There is a trend divergence between ECI: Wages and Salaries and ECI: Benefits for all civilian workers. The former eased to 3.2% YoY in 2026’s second quarter, the lowest reading in five years. The latter advanced at a 3.8% YoY rate, the highest in five quarters. Moreover, the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) unpublished Health Benefits for Private Industry, a subset of ECI benefits, expanded at a much swifter 6.0% YoY. The combination of higher benefit inflation and slower wage inflation implies an environment that is not favorable for corporate profits.

The picture for the private sector is similar to that for all civilian workers, with one difference. Private ECI: Compensation costs are not steady, they are, instead, decelerating. In the second quarter, Private ECI: Compensation downshifted to a 3.3% YoY figure, the lowest since 2021’s second quarter. Private ECI: Wages and Salaries came in at a 3.1% YoY rate, the weakest since 2021’s first quarter. Private ECI: Benefits advanced to 3.8% YoY, the strongest since 2023’s third quarter.

The spread between Private ECI: Wages and Private ECI: Benefits illustrates private sector profit pressure. In the second quarter, the -0.7% spread was the lowest in 14 years. Benefit costs are determined by market forces and are an expense beyond any private companies’ control. Wages and salaries, on the other hand, are an important line item completely under the purview of C-suite executives. The easing in private wage pressures suggests that firms are opting to trim one cost at the expense of another. From private workers’ perspective, the higher benefit/lower wage growth results in faster growth for paychecks, but slower growth for take-home pay.

The BLS report also has an alternative way to observe oscillating pressures on consumer purchasing power with “real” inflation-adjusted measures. To that end, consumers’ purchasing power loss in 2026’s second quarter, measured by the Real ECI: Wages and Salaries, amounted to a -0.3% YoY decline. This the weakest since 2022’s fourth quarter. However, outside the pandemic-disruption period, this compression was the worst in 14 years. 

Lack of forward momentum from the Real ECI: Wages and Salaries fundamentally does not support an accelerating profile for Real Consumer Spending over the near term. Special factors that supported second quarter consumer spending, like the World Cup, also should dissipate as the summer quarter unfolds.

The disinflationary takeaway from the nominal and real wage picture for household income supports the Fed’s inaction to hold rates steady at the July 29 FOMC meeting. The combination of higher benefit/lower wage growth generating a profit squeeze is another disinflationary takeaway for corporate income that sides with the Fed doves.

The employment cost index measures the change in the cost of labor, free from the influence of employment shifts across occupations and industries. It is provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and is available in Haver’s **USECON** database. Consensus estimates from the Action Economics Forecast Survey are in Haver’s **AS1REPNA** database.

large_260731H4.jpg

medium_260731H4.jpg

small_260731H4.jpg

thumbnail_260731H4.jpg

260731H4.jpg

large_260731I4.jpg

medium_260731I4.jpg

small_260731I4.jpg

thumbnail_260731I4.jpg

260731I4.jpg

- Compensation growth was steady.
- But faster benefit growth is not favorable for profits.
- Slower wage growth is employers' reaction.

Steady Employment Cost Index Reveals Divergent Wages and Benefits

Our global data offering is unparalleled in terms of coverage, quality, and organization. We offer 290+ databases from 2500 government and private sources, a wealth of key survey and forecast data covering the world’s economies, and a robust offering of archive databases that drive machine learning for big data applications.

Optimized for precision analytics, our data is seamlessly integrated with Microsoft Office and all leading statistical packages through our DLX® software and platform independent HaverView™ website. We further offer direct database feeds, client server or cloud-based delivery, and RESTful API.


Privacy Policy

Disclaimer

Contact us

Service Health

A premier time series data platform for the global strategy, research, and quant communities. 

New York

Tokyo

London

Singapore

Economy in Brief

Viewpoints

Contact Us

Our Data

Our Products

What We Do

Our Authors

About Us

Data News

Featured Data Additions

Resources

Release Calendars

Training Center

Webinars

Newsletters

Download Software

For Clients

Live Updates

#### World Economy Tracked for You 
Haver's worldwide economic data coverage provides a productive resource for analysts, strategists, and risk managers alike. With 45+ years as the industry leader, our breadth of data is unmatched.


#### Diverse Data Sources
From international banks to the farthest reaches of emerging markets, our coverage meets the needs of the global research community.

#### Driven By Quality
Committed to quality and transparency, all data sourced and delivered is continuously monitored and validated to ensure the highest level of accuracy. 

#### Global Data 
From archives to forecasts, primary-sourced from around the globe, we offer 290+ time-series databases.

#### Speed Matters
Delivering precise data as quickly as possible is our priority, which we accomplish in about one minute of release.

Data

#### Comprehensive Solutions
Effortlessly navigate, analyze, and visualize data with our broad array of tools and seamless integration with industry leading statistical and econometric packages. Gain insight and share your perspectives with ease.

#### Secure Data Access 
Effortlessly manage and work with data — delivered to your network or via our cloud services. The choices are easy, and the results are the same, fully secure and consistent access.

#### HaverView™
With a commitment to making data accessible for any work environment, our HaverView web application offers a flexible and productive resource for the dynamic research markets we serve. 

#### Data Exports and Workflow Management
Our DLX software integrates with MS Office allowing seamless publication in PowerPoint and Word as well as intuitive data management in Excel. Flexible data feeds are also supported by a variety of methods. 

Software

#### Econometric Software Support
Use our various integration tools to access our data in popular econometric software such as SAS, Stata and MatLab.

#### Designed for Programming
Access our data using multiple programming languages including Python, R, C and C++.

#### RESTful API
Restful API access to all DLX databases, supporting quant and machine learning applications. Big data rejoice!

Connectivity

#### Commentaries, Charts and Webcasts
Our team of noted economists produce a daily offering of commentaries supported by our data and analytics. Our charts and webcasts offer a fresh perspective on the state of world economy.

#### Value Added Calculations
World and regional aggregates and many other value added calculations for individual countries including seasonal and holiday adjustments. We love math!

#### Blue Chip Consensus Forecasts
Survey of America's leading business economists for their forecasts of economic and financial data. Results in two monthly publications, the Blue Chip Economic Indicators and the Blue Chip Financial Forecasts, published by Wolters Kluwer.

#### Curated Navigation
Intuitive menus designed and reviewed by our economists for easy navigation of Haver's expanding ocean of data.

Research

#### Data for Colleges and Universities
Customized data available through HaverView providing access to over 120,000 economic and financial time series for the US and UK.

#### Academic Data Scope
National Account (GDP), Production, Labour Market, Inflation, Monetary/Fiscal Policy & International Trade. High-frequency data covering financial variables and drivers of the real economy, and key ESG environmental indicators. Plus, time series from the IMF on 190+ countries to aid cross comparison.

University

#### Move Back through Time
Terabytes of time series from primary sourced databases available in monthly snapshots as early as 2000, in weekly snapshots as early as 2007 or the point of inception of the database. 

Discover Haver!

Data

Software

Connectivity

Research

University

Archive

World Economy Tracked for You

Diverse Data Sources

Driven By Quality

Global Data

Speed Matters

Economic Commentary

Steady Employment Cost Index Reveals Divergent Wages and Benefits

Recent Commentaries

Charts of the Week: The Price of an Investment Boom

Personal Income, Consumption, and Prices in June

U.S. GDP Increased 1.5% in Q2

U.S. Initial Unemployment Claims Rose in the Week of July 25

European GDP Improves in Q2

Message to Fed Chair: "Learn to Forecast"

Latest Releases

Graph of the Week

Rising US long-term real yields point to strong demand for investment funding

Economy in Brief

Viewpoints