Haver’s data services are provided through the DLX platform; delivering tools for data management, visualization, modeling and publishing. DLX is designed to increase productivity and integrates with Excel, PowerPoint, and major statistical software packages; MatLab, R, Python, SAS, E-views and Stata. DLX component application DLXVG3 offers precision graphics, publishing, analytic tools, and easy navigation for all Haver databases.

icon-chart.png

Chart and compare multiple data series with accompanying data table of values

Advanced functions (growth rates, moving averages, aggregation, seasonal adjustment)

Analytical tools (cycle charts, scatterplots, trend lines, and recession shading)

Complete graph customization (axis scaling, sizing, formatting, styles)

Excel and PowerPoint direct export and complete integration (dynamic spreadsheets and presentations update on a click)

DLXVG3

icon-db.png

DLX Add-ins for all versions of Excel provide instant data updates of entire workbooks

Use DLXVG3 to locate data series codes from within any file, easily creating new spreadsheets for analysis

Edit date ranges, archive data, apply functions

Excel Spreadsheet Add-ins

icon-time.png

Haver offers timely, accurate, and professionally supported data via an update service, meeting the strictest demands of the institutional research community

AutoUpdate provides fast and reliable data updates within seconds of source releases

Timer service runs continuously on an hourly basis when DLX is running

Manual updates offer clients the independence to update data retrievals on any desired schedule

All database updates retrieve only the data series that have changed and send only the data points that have been updated; including revisions

Timely Updates

DLX software tools to convert data into many different formats needed for diverse analytical frameworks

Haver supports a DLX API permitting clients to leverage and build processes with DLX data

Database Compatibility

products-dlx.svg

Data Link Express

Platform Independent site delivering DLX Databases across any workstation or device.

products-haverview.svg

HaverView

[Matlab](http://matlab.com) by The MathWorks lets you access, visualize, and analyze historic time-series data to identify patterns or uncover complex relationships. From within a single environment you can:

- Access data from multiple sources including files, spreadsheets, databases, data providers, and the Web
- Store data in financial time-series objects to simplify data management, data transformation, missing-data handling, and date-math calculations
- Perform technical analysis with moving averages, oscillators, stochastics, and indices
- Create custom analysis routines and visualizations or animations to capture, present, and share your analysis processes and discoveries
- Customize your analysis environment with advanced functionality from signal processing, statistics, or econometrics

products-matlab.svg

MATLAB

[Stata Data Analysis and Statistical Software](https://www.stata.com) by StataCorp LP is an integrated statistical package designed for researchers of all disciplines. It provides the ability to do data analysis, data management and graphics and has features such as multiple imputation, factor variables, GMM, competing-risks regression, state-space modeling, predictive margins, and more.

products-stata.svg

Stata

[SAS](https://www.sas.com) provides an integrated environment for predictive and descriptive modeling, data mining, text analytics, forecasting, optimization, simulation, experimental design and more. From predictive analytics to model deployment and process optimization, SAS provides a range of techniques and processes for the collection, classification, analysis and interpretation of data to reveal patterns, anomalies, key variables and relationships, leading ultimately to new insights and better answers faster.

[SASEHAVR](http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/etsug/67525/HTML/default/viewer.htm#etsug_sasehavr_gettingstarted01.htm) is a seamless interface between Haver and SAS data processing that enables SAS users to read economic and financial time series data that reside in a Haver Analytics DLX (Data Link Express) database. [SASEHAVR](http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/etsug/67525/HTML/default/viewer.htm#etsug_sasehavr_gettingstarted01.htm) requires both SAS/ETS and Base SAS Software.

products-sas.svg

[RATS (Regression Analysis of Time Series) Econometric Software](https://estima.com) by Estima is a leading econometrics and time-series analysis software package. It provides ability to do linear and non-linear least squares, forecasting, SUR and ARIMA models and in addition, supports advanced techniques such as GMM, ARCH and GARCH models, state space models, and more.

products-rats.svg

RATS

Session 1: Bootcamp Part 1

Visualization with GGPlot2 and data analysis

Session 2: Bootcamp Part 2

Session 3: Univariate Models Part 1

Session 4: Univariate Models Part 2

Session 5: Vector Autoregressions

Session 6: Cointegration and error-correction models

A popular open source option for statistical computing and graphics that is available on many UNIX platforms, Windows and MacOS

Estimating, evaluating, and forecasting ARIMA models

Understanding the concept of non-stationarity and testing for unit roots

Estimating autoregressions, granger causality tests, and impulse response functions

Understanding the concept of cointegration and testing using the Enger-Granger test

Estimating and forecasting with vector error correction models

products-r.svg

Teaches econometrics and forecasting at the University of Colorado Denver. He has over 15 years of econometric experience in both the private and public sector.

Daniel L. Jerrett, Ph.D.

Abdel M. Zellou, Ph.D.

Bootcamp and Econometric Tools 1 & 2

Econometrics Training: Applied Time Series in R

Session 5: Multivariate Models Part 1

Session 6: Multivariate Models Part 2

Haver partners with SmartMacro Labs to offer a two week immersive online course introducing participants to the power of the Python programming language. This applied hands-on training develops statistical economics skills with a concentration on economics and finance.

Gain proficiency in building modern time-series models in Python through real-world applications. Designed for professionals in both the public and private sector, the course does not require prior experience, assuming only that participants have a basic understanding of regression and statistical concepts.

Proficiency working in Jupyter notebooks and the Python environment

products-python.svg

Remote Training: Applied Time Series in Python

Despite resilient economy, US consumers are not very happy

Robert Brusca

261027E.jpg

**EMU Money Growth**
Money supply in the European Monetary Union had slowed in September as the near-term growth rates peaked at a 12-month pace of 4.4% annualized. Over six months, growth is 2.7%, annualized; over three months, M2 money supply growth is at an annualized rate of 1.8%. The EMU shows a clear slowing in nominal money growth. This has led to a decline and a contraction in real money balances in the monetary union. Real money supply growth over three years, two years, and one year is locked into a very narrow range of 0.5% to 0.6% at an annual rate. However, over six months, the annualized rate of growth is -1.9%; over three months, the annual rate of growth is -4.4%. Nominal money supply growth and the pace of real money balances are clearly pulling back in the monetary union.

**Credit Growth in EMU**
Nominal credit growth is also slowing in the Monetary Union as nominal credit growth peaked over 12 months at 4.5% and has decelerated to a three-month growth rate annualized at 3.1%. Private sector credit peaked over 12 months at 4.5%, decelerated to a 3.8% annualized rate over six months, and then decelerated again to a 3.2% annualized rate over three months. In real terms, private credit is also slowing and contracting, with both total and private credit growth rates in the neighborhood of -3% growth, expressed at an annual rate over three months.

**The U.S. - An Uneven Picture**
The U.S. shows only a hint of monetary slowing as nominal money growth is 4.1% over the last three years, climbing to 5.7% over 12 months and rising further to a 7.2% pace over six months. It does slow over three months but only to a pace of 6.0%, leaving it below its six-month pace and yet above all the other growth rate calculations, making the assessment of a ‘slowdown’ premature.

The U.S. monetary real balance growth rate shows a hint of slowing, but the signal is not clear. Real M2 growth is 1.1% over three years; it rises to 1.9% over 12 months, rises to 3.4% over six months, and then drifts lower to 1.3% over three months. This pace shows period-to-period deceleration but is still above its three-year pace, and the three-month decline may be too steep to take at face value.

**U.K. Money Growth - Lagged Readings**
The U.K. is a month behind the other countries in reporting money growth for September. U.K. nominal M4 growth is in a nominal slowing mode, with the annualized growth pace down to 3.3% over three months. U.K. real money balances show monetary contraction over six months and three months, with the three-month pace at a chilling -1.8%, still not quite as steep as the money or credit slowing in the EMU.

**Japanese Money Trends**
The last country on the table is Japan, where M2 plus CD nominal growth rates appear fairly flat. The three-year growth rate in Japan has averaged 1.6% at an annual rate; the 12-month pace stepped up to a 1.9% growth rate, which has since ticked down to a 1.8% annualized rate over both three and six months. Money growth in Japan is relatively flat in nominal terms while persistently shrinking in real terms. The growth hit to real balances in Japan shows them contracting over all periods in the table. Over 12 months, real balance growth is -0.3%; then the annual rate of decline becomes more intense over three months and six months at -1.3% for both of those tenors. The real balance slowdown is clear; however, for nominal money, the growth profile is simply flat.

**Implications**
Having more resilient money growth in the U.S. could be a problem for the rest of the world if the U.S. takes this as a sign that it has more of an entrenched or even growing inflation problem because it will be then raising rates while other countries are experiencing weakening money growth and are going to be less able to absorb the increases in interest rates that rate hikes in the U.S. could start to impose on the global economy. All of the central banks in this table are engaged in some process of an interest-rate tightening. The Bank of Japan has been engaged in a very slow and steady process of ‘normalization.’ The ECB process has been a little bit more aggressive and preemptive, while in the U.K. the inflation numbers are starting to look a little bit worse and could motivate the Bank of England to go back on the rate hiking path after it had sought some moderation.

261027.jpg

**Summing Up**
The situation with money supply growth globally is uncomfortable, and it's equally as uncomfortable as the fiscal situations that all the countries in this table find themselves in. Of course, France right now is experiencing the worst blowback. It is really between a rock and a hard place, with an inability to raise taxes and demands for further spending. But the U.K. and the U.S. are also in relatively unenviable positions. In Japan, Prime Minister Sano Kaichi has been able to engineer some measured investment-led government spending despite the large deficits there and the heavy debt-to-GDP burden.

**The Outlook**
The outlook for growth, inflation, and interest rates across these countries remains uncertain, with the price of oil high and lingering at high levels and the war in the Middle East still unresolved. It's hard to make any kind of statement about the future in which we can have confidence. Policymakers in all these countries are going to be watching global events while dealing with market pressures, political realities, economic trends, and pursuing the clear need to get inflation back down inside their monetary targets without doing economic damage. It's a tall order for the period ahead.

Money Supplies Slow Except in the U.S.

Winnie Tapasanun

261026A14.jpg

261026B14.jpg

The Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) was at +0.07 in September, up from a downwardly revised -0.08 in August (-0.04 initially) and down from an upwardly revised +0.12 in July (+0.08 previously), today’s report from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago showed, indicating that economic activity was slightly above its historical trend for the third time in four months in September after slightly below the historical trend in August. The latest CFNAI was above a low of -0.49 in October 2025 and a reading of -0.31 in September 2025 but below a high of +0.39 in February 2025.

The index's three-month moving average (CFNAI-MA3), which smooths out the m/m volatility in the index, edged up to +0.03 in September from +0.01 in August (unrevised), registering the fourth successive positive reading and the seventh in eight months. It was above a low of -0.39 in October 2025 and -0.23 in September 2025 but below its recent high of +0.07 in April. The CFNAI-MA3 is expressed in standard deviation units from zero (with a value of zero defined as trend real GDP growth). Research at the Chicago Fed indicates that an average reading of -0.70 or below is consistent with the economy being in a recession. Therefore, the September CFNAI-MA3 suggested that the U.S. economy is not currently in a recession.

The September reading reflected m/m increases in three of the four CFNAI key components and two positive contributions. The contribution of the Production & Income index to the CFNAI rose to +0.13 in September, the highest reading since April, from -0.06 in August; it was below a high of +0.37 in February 2025 but above -0.10 in September 2025 and a low of -0.61 in January 2024. The contribution of the Sales, Orders & Inventories index rebounded to +0.02 in September, the fourth positive reading in five months, from -0.03 in August; it was above -0.17 in September 2025 and a low of -0.19 in April 2025 but below a high of +0.16 in March 2025. The Employment, Unemployment & Hours index improved to a neutral value (0.00) in September from -0.02 in August; it was above its recent low of -0.13 in February and -0.01 in September 2025 but below its recent high of +0.05 in January. The contribution of the Personal Consumption & Housing index fell to -0.08 in September, the second negative reading in three months and the lowest level since May 2025, from +0.02 in August; it was below -0.03 in September 2025 and a high of +0.09 in March 2025 but above a low of -0.14 in January 2025.

The CFNAI Diffusion Index—which measures the breadth of change in the component series and is also a three-month moving average—ticked up to +0.06 in September, the seventh straight positive reading, from an upwardly revised +0.05 in August (+0.02 initially). A string of negative readings was posted during the March 2023 to February 2026 period. A reading of zero indicates that all of the indicators are growing at their long-term average. The September reading was above a low of -0.58 in October 2025 and -0.34 in September 2025 but below its recent high of +0.13 in July (matching September 2022).

The CFNAI is a weighted average of 85 indicators of national economic activity. It is constructed to have an average value of zero and a standard deviation of one. Since economic activity tends toward trend growth rate over time, a positive index reading corresponds to growth above trend and a negative index reading corresponds to growth below trend.

These figures are available in Haver's **SURVEYS** database.

- CFNAI up to +0.07 in Sept., positive for the third time in four mths.
- Three of four CFNAI components up m/m; two make positive contributions.
- CFNAI-MA3 up to +0.03, fourth consecutive positive reading; above -0.70 (recession signal).
- CFNAI Diffusion Index up to +0.06, remaining positive for the seventh straight mth.

Chicago Fed National Activity Index Turns Positive in September

261026E.jpg

The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) survey responses in October, for October itself or looking to the month ahead, show sharp improvements in the current results and significant improvement in expected retail sales and less broad improvement for expected wholesale orders and sales.

The rank standings of the survey categories all are below their 50% marks, their respective medians, for all the survey items except for the retail survey on sales for the time of year and for inventory ratios.

**Overview**
This means that despite some relatively pronounced recovery between September and October, conditions are still subpar for most of the categories. October levels are generally above levels posted a year ago as well and here, we're comparing the actual readings in October to October of one year ago, and the expectations for November to November of one year ago. For the most part, we're seeing significant improvements on that basis. We're also seeing significant improvements in the October-November values for current and expected activities compared to the 12-month averages. So, the U.K. economy has been through a real sort of baptism of fire over the last 12 months, with extremely weak readings having been posted and then, in October, or looking ahead to November, there is quite a remarkable improvement. But the economy was in such a deep hole that even with this sharp month-to-month jump, conditions continue to score out as weak compared to historic benchmarks.

**Retailing in real time**
The retail survey, for example, is showing sales in October for the concept ‘sales compared to a year ago’ at a -10 diffusion reading, compared to -55 in September and a 12-month average of -41. Orders, compared to a year ago, at -36 in October sharply improve; they also are up from -62 in September, but they're only back to their 12-month average, which is -36. Sales ‘for the time of year’ improve sharply to -3 in October from -40 in September; that compares to a 12-month average of -25. Without referencing the ranking statistics, it's clear that there's a sharp improvement underway, but when we reference the queue rankings, we see that it's still an improvement that has a long way to go just to get back to ‘average.’

**Retailing expectations**
Similarly, the expectations for retailing for ‘sales compared to a year ago’ in November are at -10 compared to -37 in October; that compares to a 12-month average of -34. Orders, compared to a year ago, come in at -29 for November’s expectations, up from -63 in October; that compares to a 12-month average of -35. So that marks a sharp improvement month-to-month, but a modest improvement compared to the 12-month average. Sales ‘for the time of year’ also improve to -24 for what's expected in November, from -39 in October; the -24 reading is only marginally better than the -26 average over the last 12 months.

**Current wholesaling evaluations**
The volume assessments for the current situation in wholesaling show similar improvements in October compared to September and also for the October standings relative to the 12-month averages. Sales compared to a year ago, for example, are at a -4 reading in October compared to -24 in September, which compares to a 12-month average of -26. But here again the queue standing for that October reading is only in its 34th percentile, barely above the lower third of all readings chronicled back to August 2002. Orders compared to a year ago come in at -10 compared to -22 in September, which compares to a -34 average over 12 months. Sales ‘for the time of year,’ a sort of seasonally adjusted view, actually deteriorate in wholesaling to -26 in October from -21 in September, but there is an improvement when compared to the 12-month average of -31.

**Wholesaling expectations**
Wholesaling expectations improve to -10 in November on the metric ‘sales compared to a year ago,’ a significant improvement from October’s -23 reading and an improvement from the 12-month average of -29. Orders ‘compared to a year ago’ improve to a reading of -21 in November from -28 in October; that's a nice improvement from the -37 average over 12 months. Sales ‘for the time of year,’ however, deteriorate slightly in November to -26 from -24 in October, although there is an improvement from the 12-month average of -32. Expected ‘sales for the time of year’ have an extremely low ranking, with a lower 12th percentile standing. But that was also the low ranking in retailing this month, for expected sales for the time of year in November, even though in retailing there was a sharp monthly improvement.

261026.jpg

**The bottom line**
So, the message from distributive trades in October is mixed. But it’s a mixed message that's still relatively positive. The various aspects of the distributive trades survey largely show improvements and some significant improvements from where they had been, especially one month ago. But one month ago, these readings really had their back against the wall; so even though there are improvements, conditions are still scored out as weak, when compared to history. However, they had been abysmally weak and so this is still a significant improvement for many measures. It's far from signaling that the economy is out of the woods, but it does suggest that the economy faces challenges that are perhaps more normal rather than the extraordinary circumstances it had seemed to face over the past year and especially one month ago.

United Kingdom

U.K. CBI Survey Remains Weak but Sharply Rebounds

Tian Yong Woon

In this week’s Letter, we take stock of a busy run of central bank decisions across Asia, as most of the region tightens in the face of an oil-driven inflation shock. So far this year, most central banks in the region have raised rates (chart 1). The US-Iran conflict, a renewed Fed hiking cycle and domestic pressures have driven this, with Thailand the clear exception. In Indonesia, BI held its benchmark rate at 5.75% but raised its deposit facility rate and cut reserve requirements (chart 2). Indonesian assets remain under heavy pressure, with equities hit further by MSCI’s potential downgrade to standalone status. In South Korea, the BoK paused at 3.00% after hikes in July and August, with markets eyeing November for another move. Yet much of its inflation is imported and its growth export-led, so the headline data may overstate its room to tighten (chart 3). The Philippines faces a harder trade-off. The BSP hiked for a fourth straight meeting as energy prices, El Niño risks and a record-weak peso push inflation up. Growth, meanwhile, remains a laggard (chart 4). Looking ahead, the Fed, ECB and BoJ all decide this week. The BoJ is expected to hold at 1.25% and hike in December, with solid wages and business sentiment offsetting weak household spending (chart 5). Thailand also decides this week. Having cut to 1.00% in February, the Bank of Thailand faces a soft economy weighed down by household debt and weak tourism. Relative to its pre-pandemic level, its real GDP has recovered the least in emerging Asia, a sign of deep pandemic scarring (chart 6).

**The year so far**
The past week brought a cluster of monetary policy decisions in Asia. Bank Indonesia (BI) and the Bank of Korea (BoK) held their policy rates, while the Philippines’ central bank (BSP) raised its policy rate by 25 bps. Zooming out, most central banks in the region have tightened policy so far this year (chart 1). Several forces lie behind this. The oil price shock from the US-Iran conflict has pushed inflation higher across the region. In the US, the Fed resumed hiking in September with a 25 bp move to 3.75% to 4%, its first increase in three years. Domestic factors have added to the pressure in several economies. There are exceptions, however. Malaysia has broadly stood pat, while Thailand has gone the other way. The Bank of Thailand cut its policy rate to 1.00% in February, in part to support soft domestic growth.

261026T1.jpg

**Indonesia**
In its latest decision, Bank Indonesia held its benchmark rate at 5.75% last week (chart 2), with economists split between a hold and a hike. It did, however, act on two other fronts. It raised the deposit facility rate by 25 bps to 5.00% to try to attract inflows. It also cut banks’ rupiah reserve requirement by 2 ppts, from 9% to 7% in two steps, to release liquidity. BI has raised its benchmark rate by 1 ppt this year, all of it in May and June. Even so, Indonesian assets remain under pressure. Policy concerns, among other factors, have weighed on the rupiah, equities and bonds. Equities took a further hit after MSCI proposed in mid-October a two-step downgrade from emerging market to standalone status. That would exclude Indonesian stocks from MSCI’s major benchmarks and the tracker funds that follow them, raising the risk of large outflows. Separately, Indonesia continues to step up efforts against persistent peatland fires, whose haze has degraded air quality in several neighbouring countries. 

261026T2.jpg

**South Korea**
The BoK kept its policy rate at 3.00% last week, a widely expected outcome after back-to-back hikes in July and August. The pause gives the board time to assess external developments and the effects of its earlier tightening. CPI inflation, at 2.9% y/y in September, remains above the 2% target. Growth is robust, supported by AI-driven demand for exports, with export volumes up more than 20% y/y on a three-month average basis (chart 3). Further tightening this year is therefore plausible, and many investors are eyeing November. However, much of the recent rise in inflation looks externally driven, through import prices, with energy import prices up sharply (chart 3). Demand-driven inflation appears limited so far, with retail sales volumes barely growing. Growth, too, has been led by exports rather than domestic demand. Looking at headline inflation and growth alone may therefore overstate how much room the BoK has for further tightening.

261026T3.gif

**The Philippines**
Moving to the Philippines, the BSP raised its policy rate for a fourth consecutive meeting last week with a larger-than-expected 50 bp move, taking it to 5.50%. Its inflation problem is more acute than that of most peers. As a heavy energy importer, the Philippines saw an outsized surge in CPI inflation on higher oil prices. Inflation reached 7.2% y/y in September, well above the 2 to 4% target (chart 4). Developing El Niño conditions threaten adverse food supply shocks, adding a second source of upward pressure. A persistently weak peso, which hit a record low beyond 63 per US dollar this month, opens a third channel through import prices. The peso’s nominal effective exchange rate now sits at its weakest level since at least 2017. All this tightening is happening against a weak growth backdrop. GDP grew just 2.3% y/y in Q2 2026, the slowest pace since 2009 outside the pandemic. That makes the Philippines’ economic catch-up a harder task than usual.

261026T4.jpg

**Japan**
Looking ahead, markets face a pivotal week, with the Fed deciding on 28 October, the ECB on 29 October and the BoJ on 30 October. Markets expect the BoJ to hold at 1.25% for now, with the next hike seen in December instead. This fits the bank’s step-by-step approach to normalisation since it ended negative rates in March 2024. Domestic indicators broadly support continued gradual tightening (chart 5). CPI inflation, at 1.9% y/y, is close to the 2% target, with lingering upside risks from oil prices and a weak yen. Wage growth remains firmly positive, with nominal cash earnings up 3.8% y/y and real earnings up 1.5% y/y. Tankan business sentiment is strong, at 19 for manufacturers and 20 for non-manufacturers. Other indicators paint a softer picture. Real household spending is still falling, down 3.1% y/y, and consumer confidence remains subdued.

261026T5.jpg

**Thailand**
The week also brings Thailand’s rate decision on 28 October. As noted earlier, the Bank of Thailand is just about the only central bank in the region to have cut this year. That stands in stark contrast with peers, which have mostly tightened or stood pat. The soft domestic backdrop behind February’s cut has persisted. Real GDP contracted 0.2% q/q sa in Q2 2026, with private consumption weighed down by household debt of 85.2% of GDP. Foreign tourist arrivals are also running about 4% below last year’s pace. More broadly, Thailand remains a laggard among its regional peers (chart 6). Real GDP only climbed back above its pre-pandemic level around the end of 2023 and now sits about 7% higher, the smallest gain in the group. This points to deep scarring from the pandemic, especially in the tourism and household sectors. Foreign arrivals reached nearly 33mn in 2025, still well short of the almost 40mn recorded in 2019.

261026T6.jpg

Asia

Economic Letter from Asia: Decisions, Decisions

261023E.jpg

Among the early reporting countries, I present flash readings for the S&P PMIs in October. Only two of these reporters, the United Kingdom and India, show stronger headline PMI readings in October than they had in September. For reporters Germany, the U.K., Australia, and the United States, stronger PMI readings for the manufacturing sector emerge in October compared to September. However, only the U.K. and Japan report stronger services readings in October than they reported in September.

The weakness in services is very broad-based, while the weakness in manufacturing is mixed. The impact on the headline causes readings to be weaker in most cases in October than they were in September. This rounds out the picture of an uneven economy as central banks are on the path to fight what has been an excess of inflation, as energy prices continue at uncomfortably high levels.

However, these results are only for the month of October. If we look at the three-month averages, which are based on historical final data and so do not include the October ‘flash’ readings, we have stronger readings across the board for the headline PMI. We have stronger readings across the board except for India in services. Also, over three months, the performance of the manufacturing sector is mixed, with four stronger and four weaker reporters.

For six months the picture is more uneven, as slightly more readings are weakening compared to the 12-month readings that are strengthening. However, over six months the U.S. shows strengthening on all three sector readings, as does India. Three-sector weakness over six months comes from Australia, while Japan, the U.K., France, Germany, and the European Monetary Union all show the headline weaker over six months, driven by a weaker services sector.

Over 12 months all the readings are stronger for all three sectors for all country comparisons except the U.S. For the U.S., weaker readings are in the services sector and the composite index compared to a year ago.

The queue percentile standings paint an upbeat picture, with the average composite reading at a 52nd percentile standing, above its historic median; manufacturing at a 58th percentile standing is looking quite strong, while services at a 46.8 percentile standing shows that the services sector has performed below its median performance on data back to 2021. Australia and India are the weakest on these timelines in terms of their ranking for their composites as well as because they have below-median results for their manufacturing and services sectors. The U.S. shows the strongest statistics on this comparison, with an 86.8 percentile standing for its composite, a 77.9 percentile standing for manufacturing, and an 85.3 percentile standing for services. Among the remaining countries, only France has a composite reading below its median, meaning it is below a ranking of 50%, while Japan manages a headline ranking of 72.1% despite having a services ranking below its 50% mark, and it does that on the strength of a manufacturing ranking in its 80.9 percentile.

Changes over 12 months show declines in all three PMI sector readings only in India and in Australia. The U.K. and France show improvements in all three sectors over 12 months, while the monetary union and Germany show headline declines over 12 months caused by a weakening services sector in the face of solid increases in manufacturing.

261023.jpg

**On Balance**
The bottom line on these PMI readings is that October was a difficult month; it was backtracking as the inflation numbers have flared. Central banks have generally been raising interest rates, and it remains to be seen how weak the conventionally reported economic data will be. It also remains to be seen how aggressively central banks are going to pursue the excess inflation problem or if they're going to view it as excessive for now but largely contained and whether they are going to start to get a little bit more concerned about growth prospects. This is the balancing act we need to look at for the period ahead. Are the central banks confident enough to go more aggressively after inflation, or are they too worried about whether growth could do anything more than raise rates modestly to defend their own credibility? That is the question.

S&P PMIs Show Mixed but Broad Weakening in October

Andrew Cates

**When the winners stumble**
The market retreat in the week to 16 October was striking for its pattern rather than its scale. Assets that had delivered the largest gains since the start of the year generally suffered the largest losses. For every ten percentage points of year-to-date gains, roughly 1.8 points were surrendered during the week (chart 1). Emerging-market equities and the Nasdaq were among the biggest casualties; broad US bonds and long-dated investment-grade credit edged higher. This looks more like a reversal of crowded positions than a wholesale reassessment of the economic outlook. But that distinction should not be too comforting. When market leadership is narrow, even modest doubts about its durability can prompt an outsized adjustment. Whether this episode proves fleeting will depend partly on the earnings and investment assumptions underpinning those earlier gains.

261022Z1.jpg

**A global expansion with one powerful engine**
This week’s export data from Japan offer a revealing measure of the scale of the AI investment boom. Shipments of semiconductors and electronic parts are growing by more than 50% y/y, while exports of chip-making machinery have also surged. Total exports are rising at a much more modest pace (chart 2). Machinery exports are especially revealing: they reflect investment in future productive capacity, not merely demand for chips today. A weaker yen has inflated export values, but cannot plausibly explain the entire divergence. The strength of this investment cycle is real. So is its concentration. Much of the apparent resilience of global manufacturing now depends on the willingness of a relatively small number of firms to keep building computing capacity. The longer that continues, the more important the eventual returns on that investment become.

261022Z2.jpg

**Britain’s awkward inflation arithmetic**
The latest UK labour-market figures complicate the outlook for inflation and interest rates. Private-sector regular pay growth, after slowing for much of the past two years, has levelled off at around 3% (3 month average, y/y) and edged higher in the latest monthly reading. Unemployment fell to 4.7% in the three months to August from 4.9 per cent in July, while payroll employment has recorded a modest increase (chart 3). Yet vacancies continue to decline, suggesting that demand for labour remains fragile. It would be premature to call this a renewed tightening of the labour market. Equally, the Bank of England cannot assume that wage disinflation will continue unaided. The uncomfortable possibility is that underlying pay pressures are proving sticky even as businesses remain reluctant to hire. That is precisely the combination that makes monetary policy difficult.

261022Z3.jpg

**Housing bears the weight of high rates**
Across much of the advanced world, housing markets have reached a similar destination by different routes. Annual nominal house-price inflation has slowed to close to zero in the US, the UK, Germany and France; Canadian prices are still falling (chart 4). Adjusted for consumer-price inflation, all five markets are losing ground. Their mortgage systems, housing supply and ownership patterns differ substantially. What they share is a prolonged period of expensive finance. The consequences extend beyond homeowners’ paper wealth. Weaker housing markets weigh on construction, household confidence and the collateral available to support borrowing. They also constrain property-related tax revenues. Housing is one of the clearest channels through which more restrictive monetary conditions and higher bond yields are working. It helps explain why an economy that continues to grow can nevertheless feel sluggish to many households.

261022Z4.jpg

**China’s investment problem deepens**
China’s latest figures this week challenge the idea that investment has simply migrated from property development to more productive industries. Real-estate investment is contracting by more than 20% y/y. Manufacturing investment has also turned negative, and investment in power, gas and water supply has followed it below zero after several years of rapid growth (chart 5). These are different sectors, with different drivers, but their simultaneous weakness is telling. Industrial production is still expanding by more than 5% y/y while retail sales are growing by barely 1%. China continues to produce far more vigorously than its households spend. That leaves growth dependent on exports at a time when trading partners are increasingly resistant to absorbing additional Chinese supply. For the rest of the world, the result is weaker Chinese demand alongside continued downward pressure on traded-goods prices.

261022Z5.jpg

**The rising cost of power**
Electricity has continued to emerge as a major constraint on the very investment boom that has helped sustain growth. Wholesale prices have increased sharply across major markets over the past year: French prices are more than three times their earlier level, those in Spain and the UK have roughly doubled, and prices in the US Mid-Atlantic market have risen by close to 80% (chart 6). The causes are not identical. French nuclear availability and Iberian hydrological conditions matter, as do local generation and transmission bottlenecks. It would be too simple to attribute every increase to data centres. Nevertheless, growing demand from electrification and computing is arriving faster than power systems can always accommodate. This matters well beyond the technology industry. Higher electricity costs squeeze households and energy-intensive businesses before any promised productivity dividend from AI becomes visible. The paradox of this expansion is becoming clearer: the investment intended to make economies more productive may, in the meantime, make them more expensive to run at least in the short term.

261022Z6.jpg

The global economy has proved remarkably resilient in the face of war, political uncertainty and persistently high borrowing costs. Yet resilience is not the same as strength. Growth has become increasingly dependent on a narrow investment boom, particularly in artificial intelligence, while its financial and physical costs are mounting. Last week's market retreat exposed the concentration of investor enthusiasm (chart 1), while Japanese exports revealed the growing importance of semiconductor investment to global industry (chart 2). Elsewhere, the picture is less reassuring. British wage disinflation appears to be stalling (chart 3), housing markets remain subdued (chart 4), and China's investment weakness has spread well beyond property (chart 5). Meanwhile, rising electricity prices point to another constraint on growth (chart 6). The underlying question is whether the investment sustaining the expansion can deliver sufficient productivity gains to justify its rising costs.

<iframe data-testid="embed-iframe" style="border-radius:12px" src="https://open.spotify.com/embed/episode/5XRYgbfDDnfnO8ofk5Qp3J?utm_source=generator&si=952717dd9814413e" width="100%" height="152" frameBorder="0" allowfullscreen="" allow="autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; fullscreen; picture-in-picture" loading="lazy"></iframe>



Charts of the Week: Growth on Borrowed Strength

Kathleen Stephansen, CBE

261022A50.jpg

261022B50.jpg

Initial claims for unemployment insurance dropped by 6,000 to 194,000 in the week ending October 17 from 200,000 in the week ending October 10, revised from 199,000. This is the lowest level since the July 18 week and suggests a relatively stable labor market. The four-week average was 197,750 in the October 17 week, down from 198,750 in the October 10 week, revised from 198,500. The Action Economics/Haver Analytics Survey looked for 200,000 claims to have been filed.

The total number of unemployment insurance beneficiaries—also known as “continuing claims”—rose 25,000 to 1.728 million in the week ending October 10, up from 1.703 million in the week ending October 3, revised from 1.710 million. This is the highest level since the August 29 week. The four-week moving average was 1.711 million in the October 10 week, up from 1.707 million in the October 3 week. The insured unemployment rate was unchanged at 1.1% in the October 10 week, where it has held since the week of August 29.

The insured unemployment rate varies greatly across individual states and territories. In the week ending October 3, no state had an insured unemployment rate above 2.00%; the highest was in New Jersey (1.98%). The lowest rates were in South Dakota (0.20%), Louisiana (0.29%), Florida (0.31%), Alabama and North Dakota (both 0.33%), North Carolina (0.35%), Arkansas (0.36%), Iowa and Tennessee (both 0.41%), Kentucky and Nebraska (both 0.43%), Kansas and Wyoming (both 0.44%), Idaho (0.45%), New Hampshire (0.47%), Georgia (0.48%), and Mississippi, Virginia and Wisconsin (all 0.49%). Rates in other notable states include Texas (0.89%), Pennsylvania (1.18%), Illinois (1.26%), New York (1.37%) and California (1.67%). These state data are not seasonally adjusted.

Data on weekly unemployment claims are from the Department of Labor itself, not the Bureau of Labor Statistics. They begin in 1967 and are contained in Haver’s **WEEKLY** database and summarized monthly in **USECON**. Data for individual states are in **REGIONW** back to December 1986.

261022C50.jpg

261022D50.jpg

- New claims declined by 6,000 to 194,000 in the week of October 17.
- Continuing claims rose by 25,000 to 1.728 million in the week ending October 10.
- The insured unemployment rate was unchanged at 1.1% in the week of October 10.

U.S. Initial Unemployment Claims Dropped in the Week of October 17

261022E.jpg

The INSEE survey for France that evaluates manufacturing and services sector firms shows a strong rebound for manufacturing in October and a solid rebound for services in the same month. However, the two sectors are experiencing significantly different environments, with the industry climate reading for manufacturing at a 76.5 percentile standing, putting it in the top 25 percentile of all performances back to 2001. The services climate reading is at a 42.8 percentile standing, leaving it below its historic median over the same period.

**Manufacturing**
The manufacturing survey shows manufacturing production expectations improved slightly, moving from a -9 reading in September to -8.5 in October; the recent trend for production increased to 2.3 in October from -1.4 in September. While participants in the survey found the prospects for their own industry, the personal likely trend rose to 18.6 from 14.3 in September. The assessment of the industry trend is still a weak one with a 40th percentile standing; however, the personal likely trend is quite strong at a 93.8 percentile standing. This shows that participants have a much more upbeat view of their own industry compared to their expectations for the manufacturing sector as a whole. Since the survey is a broad one across sectors, these results make the survey somewhat inconsistent with itself.

Orders and demand improved sharply in October with the net rating of -10.5, sharply improved from -15.8 in September. The response for foreign orders and demand showed an even stronger positive shift to -1 from -10.1 in September. The rankings for orders and demand show a 74.2 percentile standing for the overall reading, while foreign orders & demand have an 87.3 percentile standing; both of these are quite strong.

The outlook for prices diverges, with firms seeing their own likely price and trend for their industry at 10.6 in October, lower than 14.6 in September. However, for the manufacturing sector price level, they look for an escalation to 31.1 in October from 24.7 in September. The own likely price trend has a 78.1 percentile standing, while the manufacturing price level has an 83.3 percentile standing; both are looking for significant upward pressure on prices.

**Services**
The services survey in October shows an increase in the climate indicator to 99.3 from 97.8 in September; however, it still leaves the sector with a 42.8 percentile standing, below its historic median. The three-month average and the 12-month average of the climate gauge both show improvements; in both cases, they're relatively small, but a lot of that is the result of the smoothing. In terms of the rankings, the rankings for the three-month and 12-month measures are fairly similar to the ranking for the reading for the current month in October.

The outlook improved to -9 in October from -10 in September but still has only a 34.6 percentile standing, nearly a lower 1/3 standing for the outlook.

For sales, the observed performance over the last three months weakened to -5 in October from -1 in September. However, the expectations for three months ahead improved to 3.9 from 0.6 in September. The past observed trend is weak with a 22.5 percentile standing, while the expected result for the three months ahead has an above median, at a 60.8 percentile standing. With such a weak outlook, the turnaround on sales is surprising.

On the price side, there are slightly mixed results, with the observed trend over three months falling to 2.2 in October from 3.4 in September against the expected trend over the next three months, which moved up to 5 from 4.6 in September. The ranking of the past three-month trend is a 77.8 percentile standing; the ranking for the expected trend is a stronger 89.2 percentile standing.

261022.jpg

**Summing up**
For both services and industry outlooks, we see concerns or expectations of higher prices ahead. Manufacturing shows a split view on the recent growth trend versus the trend that respondents are expecting for their own industries, while for services, the overall industry expectation is upbeat despite a low ranking on the past three-month trend.

In assessing what these things mean for France, it's difficult to say because the country is involved in this current upheaval with nationwide protests, some of them of terrific intensity. One thing the survey tells us is that, at least at the time these demonstrations were occurring, the economy was performing fairly well. We'll have to look in the coming months to see how much of this dissatisfaction winds up undercutting what had been a relatively stable-to-strong economy with improving expectations, but also one layered with inflation concerns.

France

French Industry and Services Both Improve

Sandy Batten

large_261029N1.jpg

medium_261029N1.jpg

small_261029N1.jpg

thumbnail_261029N1.jpg

261029N1.jpg

large_261029O1.jpg

medium_261029O1.jpg

small_261029O1.jpg

thumbnail_261029O1.jpg

261029O1.jpg

Real GDP grew 3.4% q/q saar in Q3 following a 2.2% increase in Q2 and a 2.5% gain in Q1, according to the Advance release from the BEA. The Action Economics Forecast Survey looked for a 3.1% quarterly gain. Over the first three quarters of this year, GDP has grown at a 2.7% annual rate, well above its longer-term trend. Compared with a year ago, GDP was up 2.1% in Q3, Domestic demand was very strong in Q3. Final sales to domestic purchasers jumped 5.0% q/q (2.9% y/y), its fastest quarterly pace since the economy reopened from the Covid shutdown, up from 3.8% in Q2 and 2.3% in Q1. Final sales to private domestic purchasers (the Federal Reserve’s preferred measure of aggregate demand) rose 4.9% at an annual rate in Q3 (3.3% y/y) versus 4.6% in Q2 and 1.8% in Q1. For the first three quarters of 2026, final sales to domestic purchasers rose 3.7% at an annual rate while final sales to private domestic purchasers increased 3.8%.

Personal consumption expenditures and business spending on equipment and intellectual property continued to provide much of the boost to overall GDP growth in Q3. PCE grew 3.8% q/q saar in Q3, accounting for 2.5%-points of overall GDP growth, the same increase and contribution as in Q2. The composition of the Q3 increase was somewhat different from that in Q2. Spending on goods slowed to 3.0% from 4.5% in Q2, reflecting slower spending growth for both motor vehicles and furnishings, and a decline in spending on recreational goods and vehicles. By contrast, spending on services picked up to 4.1% in Q3, its fastest quarterly pace Q2 2022, from 3.4% in Q2. One note of caution: the continued strength in consumer spending has come at the expense of saving with the saving rate declining to 4.1% in Q3, its lowest reading since Q4 2022 and calling into question the sustainability of the recent strength in spending.

Business spending on equipment remained very strong in Q3, posting its third consecutive double-digit quarterly gain. Equipment spending jumped 20.9% q/q saar in Q3 on top of a 13.4% quarterly gain in Q2 and a 15.5% quarterly increase in Q1. The Q3 increase was the largest since Q3 2020 and was led by a 37.3% annual rate surge in spending on information processing equipment. Business spending on intellectual property increased a solid 8.4% in Q3 though a slowdown from the 9.2% in Q2 and 15.6% in Q1, due mostly to a slowdown in spending on software from very lofty levels. Together, these two added 1.6%-points to total GDP growth. Business construction spending also made a meaningful contribution to overall growth in Q3 for the first time in six quarters. It rose 5.4% and added 0.2%-point to GDP growth. Quarterly gains, apart from a decline in manufacturing, were widespread across sectors with a particularly large increase in construction of data centers (128% annual rate gain). After a surprising 2.8% q/q increase in Q2, residential construction fell 3.4% in Q3, its sixth quarterly decline in the past seven quarters.

large_261029P1.jpg

medium_261029P1.jpg

small_261029P1.jpg

thumbnail_261029P1.jpg

261029P1.jpg

large_261029Q1.jpg

medium_261029Q1.jpg

small_261029Q1.jpg

thumbnail_261029Q1.jpg

261029Q1.jpg

Inventories returned to a growth supporter in Q3 after having declined in each of the preceding five quarters. Inventories increased $20.3 billion (2017$) in Q3 and added 1.6% points to overall GDP growth. Government spending also contributed to growth in Q3 after having been essentially unchanged in Q2. Total government spending increased 5.3% q/q saar in Q3, adding 0.9%-point to GDP growth, versus a 0.1% quarterly decline in Q2. Federal government spending rebounded, jumping 15.8% q/q after a 2.4% quarterly decline in Q2, reflecting sizeable increases in both defense (11.7%) and nondefense (22.2%) spending. By contrast, spending by state and local governments was essentially unchanged in Q3 following a 1.2% gain in Q2.

As was widely anticipated from the quarterly trade reports, the trade balance widened markedly in Q3 with net exports subtracting 3.3%-points from overall GDP growth, the third largest quarterly subtraction in the history of the series dating back to 1947, on top of a 1.1%-point subtraction in Q2. Imports jumped 19.7% q/q saar, largely reflecting a 58.7% annual rate increase in imports of capital goods. It seems that the rising pace of AI build outs is being supplied predominantly by foreign production—notably semiconductors. Imports of consumer goods edged up only 1.0%. By contrast, exports declined 5.7%, the first quarterly decline in three quarters, with weakness relatively widespread across major sectors.

With energy prices receding in Q3 following their Q2 surge, quarterly GDP inflation slowed accordingly. The rise in the GDP price index slowed to 2.3% q/q saar in Q3 from 6.1% in Q2. Energy prices fell 7.4% q/q at an annual rate in Q3. PCE inflation (the measure targeted by the Fed) slowed to 2.1% from 5.0% while core PCE inflation (excluding food and energy prices) slowed to 2.5% from 3.3%.

The GDP data can be found in Haver’s **USECON** and **USNA** databases. **USNA** contains virtually all of the Bureau of Economic Analysis detail in the national accounts. The Action Economics consensus estimates can be found in **AS1REPNA**.

large_261029R1.jpg

medium_261029R1.jpg

small_261029R1.jpg

thumbnail_261029R1.jpg

261029R1.jpg

large_261029S1.jpg

medium_261029S1.jpg

small_261029S1.jpg

thumbnail_261029S1.jpg

261029S1.jpg

- The quarterly gain was led by personal consumption, business spending on equipment, and inventory rebuilding.
- Net exports subtracted 3.3%-points from overall growth, the third largest quarterly drag in the history of the series.
- Domestic demand growth accelerated to well above trend.
- Reflecting the retreat in energy prices in Q3, GDP inflation decelerated markedly.

U.S. GDP Jumped 3.4% in Q3 with Strong Domestic Demand

Our global data offering is unparalleled in terms of coverage, quality, and organization. We offer 290+ databases from 2500 government and private sources, a wealth of key survey and forecast data covering the world’s economies, and a robust offering of archive databases that drive machine learning for big data applications.

Optimized for precision analytics, our data is seamlessly integrated with Microsoft Office and all leading statistical packages through our DLX® software and platform independent HaverView™ website. We further offer direct database feeds, client server or cloud-based delivery, and RESTful API.


Privacy Policy

Disclaimer

Contact us

Service Health

A premier time series data platform for the global strategy, research, and quant communities. 

New York

Tokyo

London

Singapore

Economy in Brief

Viewpoints

Contact Us

Our Data

Our Products

What We Do

Our Authors

About Us

Data News

Featured Data Additions

Resources

Release Calendars

Training Center

Webinars

Newsletters

Download Software

For Clients

Live Updates

#### World Economy Tracked for You 
Haver's worldwide economic data coverage provides a productive resource for analysts, strategists, and risk managers alike. With 45+ years as the industry leader, our breadth of data is unmatched.


#### Diverse Data Sources
From international banks to the farthest reaches of emerging markets, our coverage meets the needs of the global research community.

#### Driven By Quality
Committed to quality and transparency, all data sourced and delivered is continuously monitored and validated to ensure the highest level of accuracy. 

#### Global Data 
From archives to forecasts, primary-sourced from around the globe, we offer 290+ time-series databases.

#### Speed Matters
Delivering precise data as quickly as possible is our priority, which we accomplish in about one minute of release.

Discover Haver!

Data

Software

Connectivity

Research

University

Archive

World Economy Tracked for You

Diverse Data Sources

Driven By Quality

Global Data

Speed Matters

Economic Commentary

U.S. GDP Jumped 3.4% in Q3 with Strong Domestic Demand

Recent Commentaries

U.S. Initial Unemployment Claims Dropped in the Week of October 24

Charts of the Week: Resilience on Narrow Foundations

U.S. Goods Trade Deficit Widens Further in September

GfK Confidence Eases Slightly in Germany; Major Setback for Confidence in France

U.S. New Home Sales Ease in September Following August Rebound

U.S. Durable Goods Orders Jump in September on Surge in Aircraft Orders

Latest Releases

Graph of the Week

Despite resilient economy, US consumers are not very happy

Economy in Brief

Viewpoints