Economy in Brief

Germany has some degree of improvement and revival underway that has lasted for three months running on its headline GfK index. The degree of improvement monthly has been small, and the pace of improvement is slow. Economic expectations have improved for four months running, marking more improvement than for the GfK headline (GfK components lag the headline by one month). Income expectations have improved for three months running, marking some steady moderate-sized improvements. The propensity to buy has also logged a couple of monthly improvements but its recent observation for May shows a step back to -6.4 from -4.9 in April, ending its short winning streak.

Percentile standings The levels of these monthly variables show a weak headline with a standing in its 12.9 percentile historically, on data back to 2002. The component rankings fare better, with the economic expectations response above its historic median at a standing in its 65.1 percentile. Income expectations are rising and closing in on their own median (median of ranked data occurs at a ranking of 50%) with a standing in its 46.8 percentile. However, the propensity to buy index continues to lag with a standing at the one-third of queue mark, at its 33.1 percentile.

Other countries The table also presents data for consumer confidence for Italy, France, and the United Kingdom; the former two are fellow members of the Economic Union, and members of the EMU (U.K. is a former EU member). These reading lag, more like the components of the GfK survey. For Italy, the lag is larger, at two months. Italian confidence shows ongoing erosion with the current reading at a rank standing of 59.8 percent, above its historic median on the same timeline as for GfK in Germany. The French confidence reading shows signs of recent slippage and presents a monthly value with a standing at its 37.9 percentile. Italy, France, and the U.K. all reached recent local lows around August 2022 and have since mounted more or less synchronous rebounds. During this period, the Italian rebound was stronger. But the rebounding has largely ended and now the consumer indexes in Italy, Frane, and the U.K. are rolling over giving into weakness. And this is at a time that the Germany survey generally is strengthening – albeit mildly.

Since mid-2023 there has been little change in the level of the EU indexes for the largest EMU economies. There has been slightly more fading for Germany, but then it has showed some revival over the past six months bringing it back into line. There is no clear evidence in these surveys that the U.S. tariff policy is having a major effect. But there is some inferential evidence from the drop in overall EMU consumer confidence although the results are still erratic across reporting countries. The economic situation for the next 12 months in the consumer survey is weaker since early-2025 and unemployment expectations have also risen. There is no discernible impact on consumers’ plans to make a new major purchase in the survey.

Overall sentiment and sector readings Eight of eighteen reporting countries in the EMU have step-backs in their sentiment assessments in May. That compares to eleven stepping back in April and ten in March.

The overall EMU sentiment gauge improves in May to 94.8 from 93.8 in April, but it is still below the March level of 95.1. For all of the EMU, the industrial sector improves in May, along with consumer confidence and retailing sentiment. Construction and services readings were unchanged month-to-month.

Rankings by sector show only retailing and construction above their historic medians on data since 1990. The overall reading as well as the industrial reading, consumer confidence, and services all have rankings below their respective 30th percentiles. Consumer confidence is weakest among the sectors attaining only its 18.6 percentile, but at a standing in its 22.4 percentile, services are not far behind.

There is no evidence of a hammer blow from the tariffs or of any revival since the tariff threat was launched then lessened. We look for some stimulus from the added need for Europe to carry more of its own defense burden. There is a directive to Europe from the U.S. to take care of more of its own NATO defense. So far, only the German industrial sector shows any sign of improving.

This week, we explore a series of interconnected themes—from China’s accelerating AI ambitions to evolving geopolitical dynamics in Southeast Asia, shaped in part by the United States’ increasingly inward focus and protectionist trade measures. Despite US chip export restrictions, some—including Nvidia’s CEO—have questioned their effectiveness. Indeed, select indicators suggest that China’s AI capabilities continue to advance (chart 1), even as broader dimensions of development—beyond raw performance—reveal areas where significant progress is still needed (chart 2).

In Indonesia, we discuss last week’s central bank rate cut, which some economists saw as necessary to support the economy amid external trade-related headwinds and reduced government spending. The move was also made possible by recent signs of rupiah stability (chart 3). In response to global trade uncertainties, Indonesia is also deepening regional ties, particularly with China—a relationship that has been strengthening even prior to this year’s US trade measures (chart 4).

Zooming out to broader regional issues, this week’s ASEAN-related summits reflect a growing inclination to expand ties with both China and the Middle East. As such, ASEAN’s already substantial trade with China (chart 5) may be poised to grow further. At the same time, ASEAN is now exploring a collective approach in trade talks with the US—alongside ongoing bilateral efforts—potentially to stave off further tariff increases on its exports (chart 6).

China’s AI push It has been another revealing week in US–China developments. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang remarked that US chip export controls have not only failed but may have accelerated China’s drive for self-reliance in AI chips—particularly at the high end. Indeed, this trend appears to be playing out. China has steadily increased investment in its AI capabilities over the years, bolstered by a strategic government push that includes substantial funding. This has led to tangible progress, such as a rising number of large-scale AI systems (see chart 1). Notably, China’s advances have continued despite sustained US efforts to hinder its technological progress—many of which were introduced under previous administrations.