Louise Curley

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071002c.jpg" width="353">
Corporate profitability in the United Kingdom continued to rise in the second quarter of this year. The net rate of return for all private nonfinancial corporations was a record 15.7%, up from 15.1% in the first quarter. (The net rate of return is defined as the ratio of net operating surplus to net capital employed.) The first chart shows the net rates of return for all private nonfinancial corporations, and for the continental shelf companies and those engaged in the manufacturing and service industries. The continental shelf companies are those engaged in the exploration for and production of oil and natural gas in the UK continental shelf. The continental shelf companies have the highest rates of return, next are those of the service companies and lowest and most volatile are those of the manufacturing companies.
In terms of profits, the service companies rank the highest. Since not all of the underlying data are available on a quarterly basis but are on an annual basis, the latter can be used to get some idea of the relative importance of each sector in the economy. In 2006, total net operating surplus amounted to 171.2 billion pounds. Of this total, the continental shelf companies accounted for about 12% and the non continental shelf companies, 88%. The service sector accounted for 76% and the manufacturing sector, 10%. The 2% discrepancy is due to the fact that the noncontinental shelf total includes data on companies in construction, electricity and gas supply, agricultural, mining and quarrying that are not shown separately.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071002d.jpg" width="353">
The manufacturing sector has steadily been losing ground to the service sector and for the first time its net operating profit was below that of the continental shelf companies in 2006, as can be seen in the second chart.
Data on the profitability of UK corporations can be found in the National Accounts section of Haver&#39;s UK data base.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">UK PROFITABILITY&nbsp; NET RATES OF RETURNS&nbsp; (Percent)</th>
<th scope="col">Q2&nbsp;&nbsp;07</th>
<th scope="col">Q1 07&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">Q4 06&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">Q3 06&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">All Nonfinancial Corps.</td>
<td>15.7</td>
<td>15.1</td>
<td>15.2</td>
<td>14.4</td>
<td>14.6</td>
<td>14.1</td>
<td>13.9</td>
<td>13.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Continental Shelf Corps. </td>
<td>30.7</td>
<td>25.3</td>
<td>33.7</td>
<td>37.6</td>
<td>41.0</td>
<td>34.2</td>
<td>25.1</td>
<td>24.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Non Continental Shelf Corps.</td>
<td>15.1</td>
<td>14.7</td>
<td>14.4</td>
<td>13.4</td>
<td>13.4</td>
<td>13.2</td>
<td>13.4</td>
<td>12.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol"> Service Corps. </td>
<td>21.4</td>
<td>21.2</td>
<td>20.8</td>
<td>19.4</td>
<td>19.6</td>
<td>17.9</td>
<td>17.5</td>
<td>17.2</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Manufacturing Corps.</td>
<td>8.4</td>
<td>5.6</td>
<td>10.0</td>
<td>6.7</td>
<td>7.8</td>
<td>9.1</td>
<td>9.5</td>
<td>8.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Corporate profitability in the United Kingdom continued to rise in the second quarter of this year. The net rate of return for all private nonfinancial corporations was a record 15.7%, up from 15.1% in the first quarter. (The net rate [...]

Profitability of all Nonfinancial UK Corporations: A Record High in the Second Quarter

Tom Moeller

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>

 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071002a.jpg" width="353">
The International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC)-UBS reported that chain store sales showed no change last week from the prior period. That followed declines of roughly 1.0% during each of the prior two consecutive weeks.
The latest reading left the average level of chain store sales during September down 0.8% versus the August average. That average had risen 0.1% from July.
During the last ten years there has been a 45% correlation between the y/y change in chain store sales and the change in nonauto retail sales less gasoline.
The ICSC-UBS retail chain-store sales index is constructed using the same-store sales (stores open for one year) reported by 78 stores of seven retailers: Dayton Hudson, Federated, Kmart, May, J.C. Penney, Sears and Wal-Mart.
The leading indicator of chain store sales from ICSC-UBS rose 0.4% (0.8% y/y) after a 0.2% decline during the prior week.
The U.S. Consumption Boom and Trade Deficit from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis is available <a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/net/20071001/cover.pdf">here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/surveyw/@S2/@S2.HTM">ICSC-UBS (SA, 1977=100)</a></th>
<th scope="col">09/29/07</th>
<th scope="col">09/22/07</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Total Weekly Chain Store Sales</td>
<td>475.5</td>
<td>4475.5</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>3.6%</td>
<td>4.7%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>


</html>

The International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC)-UBS reported that chain store sales showed no change last week from the prior period. That followed declines of roughly 1.0% during each of the prior two consecutive weeks. The [...]

Weekly U.S. Chain Store Sales Remained Low

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>

 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071002a.jpg" width="353">
The International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC)-UBS reported that chain store sales showed no change last week from the prior period. That followed declines of roughly 1.0% during each of the prior two consecutive weeks.
The latest reading left the average level of chain store sales during September down 0.8% versus the August average. That average had risen 0.1% from July.
During the last ten years there has been a 45% correlation between the y/y change in chain store sales and the change in nonauto retail sales less gasoline.
The ICSC-UBS retail chain-store sales index is constructed using the same-store sales (stores open for one year) reported by 78 stores of seven retailers: Dayton Hudson, Federated, Kmart, May, J.C. Penney, Sears and Wal-Mart.
The leading indicator of chain store sales from ICSC-UBS rose 0.4% (0.8% y/y) after a 0.2% decline during the prior week.
The U.S. Consumption Boom and Trade Deficit from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis is available <a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/net/20071001/cover.pdf">here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/surveyw/@S2/@S2.HTM">ICSC-UBS (SA, 1977=100)</a></th>
<th scope="col">09/29/07</th>
<th scope="col">09/22/07</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Total Weekly Chain Store Sales</td>
<td>475.5</td>
<td>4475.5</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>3.6%</td>
<td>4.7%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Profitability of all Nonfinancial UK Corporations: A Record High in the Second Quarter 
by <a href="/comment/Curley.html">Louise Curley</a> October 2, 2007


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071002c.jpg" width="353">
Corporate profitability in the United Kingdom continued to rise in the second quarter of this year. The net rate of return for all private nonfinancial corporations was a record 15.7%, up from 15.1% in the first quarter. (The net rate of return is defined as the ratio of net operating surplus to net capital employed.) The first chart shows the net rates of return for all private nonfinancial corporations, and for the continental shelf companies and those engaged in the manufacturing and service industries. The continental shelf companies are those engaged in the exploration for and production of oil and natural gas in the UK continental shelf. The continental shelf companies have the highest rates of return, next are those of the service companies and lowest and most volatile are those of the manufacturing companies.
In terms of profits, the service companies rank the highest. Since not all of the underlying data are available on a quarterly basis but are on an annual basis, the latter can be used to get some idea of the relative importance of each sector in the economy. In 2006, total net operating surplus amounted to 171.2 billion pounds. Of this total, the continental shelf companies accounted for about 12% and the non continental shelf companies, 88%. The service sector accounted for 76% and the manufacturing sector, 10%. The 2% discrepancy is due to the fact that the noncontinental shelf total includes data on companies in construction, electricity and gas supply, agricultural, mining and quarrying that are not shown separately.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071002d.jpg" width="353">
The manufacturing sector has steadily been losing ground to the service sector and for the first time its net operating profit was below that of the continental shelf companies in 2006, as can be seen in the second chart.
Data on the profitability of UK corporations can be found in the National Accounts section of Haver&#39;s UK data base.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">UK PROFITABILITY&nbsp; NET RATES OF RETURNS&nbsp; (Percent)</th>
<th scope="col">Q2&nbsp;&nbsp;07</th>
<th scope="col">Q1 07&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">Q4 06&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">Q3 06&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">All Nonfinancial Corps.</td>
<td>15.7</td>
<td>15.1</td>
<td>15.2</td>
<td>14.4</td>
<td>14.6</td>
<td>14.1</td>
<td>13.9</td>
<td>13.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Continental Shelf Corps. </td>
<td>30.7</td>
<td>25.3</td>
<td>33.7</td>
<td>37.6</td>
<td>41.0</td>
<td>34.2</td>
<td>25.1</td>
<td>24.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Non Continental Shelf Corps.</td>
<td>15.1</td>
<td>14.7</td>
<td>14.4</td>
<td>13.4</td>
<td>13.4</td>
<td>13.2</td>
<td>13.4</td>
<td>12.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol"> Service Corps. </td>
<td>21.4</td>
<td>21.2</td>
<td>20.8</td>
<td>19.4</td>
<td>19.6</td>
<td>17.9</td>
<td>17.5</td>
<td>17.2</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Manufacturing Corps.</td>
<td>8.4</td>
<td>5.6</td>
<td>10.0</td>
<td>6.7</td>
<td>7.8</td>
<td>9.1</td>
<td>9.5</td>
<td>8.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Euro Area PPI Behaves in August 
by <a href="/comment/Brusca.html">Robert Brusca</a> October 2, 2007


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071002e.jpg" width="353">
The Euro Area&#39;s year-over-year PPI excluding construction continues to head lower, while the six-month measure has seen some steady pressure and recent quasi-plateauing. But the three-month PPI is heading strongly lower. On balance, the Euro area PPI seems to be well-behaved.
The trends are well-behaved across components as well. Only consumer goods prices at the producer level are showing any acceleration in the recent three-months among major categories. Capital good prices are decelerating as are intermediate and energy goods. Manufacturing as a whole shows prices decelerating and the PPI ex-energy is also decelerating. The EMU PPI is well contained.
At the country level, Germany and Italy show the same sort of compliant patterns in their respective PPIs. The EU&#146;s UK demonstrates some flare up in the overall PPI but still shows a PPI ex energy with decelerating trends. These are encouraging trends but this is not the ECB&#146;s prime inflation measure. That one, the HICP, has been showing some pressure lately. But the lack of pressure at the PPI level is still good news &#150; at least through August.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan=7 scope="col">Euro Area and UK PPI Trends</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;</td>
<td colspan="2">M/M</td>
<td colspan="4">SAAR</td>
</tr>
<tr class="grey3">
<td class="firstcol">Euro Area 13</td>
<td>Aug-07</td>
<td>Jul-07</td>
<td>3-Mo</td>
<td>6-MO</td>
<td>Yr/Yr</td>
<td>Y/Y Yr Ago</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Total ex Construction</td>
<td>0.1%</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
<td>1.7%</td>
<td style="color:red">3.2%</td>
<td>1.7%</td>
<td>5.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Excl Energy</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
<td>2.5%</td>
<td style="color:red">3.2%</td>
<td>2.9%</td>
<td>3.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Capital Goods</td>
<td>0.0%</td>
<td>0.1%</td>
<td>0.6%</td>
<td>0.9%</td>
<td style="color:red">1.6%</td>
<td>1.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Consumer Goods</td>
<td>0.5%</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td style="color:red">4.4%</td>
<td style="color:red">3.3%</td>
<td style="color:red">2.3%</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Intermediate &amp; Capital Goods</td>
<td>0.1%</td>
<td>0.1%</td>
<td>1.3%</td>
<td>3.0%</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>4.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Energy</td>
<td>-0.7%</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>-1.2%</td>
<td style="color:red">3.3%</td>
<td>-2.2%</td>
<td>12.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">MFG</td>
<td>0.1%</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
<td>2.4%</td>
<td style="color:red">4.8%</td>
<td>2.2%</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Germany</td>
<td>0.1%</td>
<td>-0.1%</td>
<td>0.7%</td>
<td style="color:red">1.7%</td>
<td>1.0%</td>
<td>5.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">PPI ex Energy</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
<td>0.1%</td>
<td>2.2%</td>
<td style="color:red">2.8%</td>
<td>2.6%</td>
<td>3.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Italy</td>
<td>0.1%</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
<td>2.0%</td>
<td style="color:red">3.7%</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
<td>6.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">PPI ex Energy</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
<td style="color:red">3.2%</td>
<td>3.1%</td>
<td>4.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">UK</td>
<td>-0.6%</td>
<td>0.7%</td>
<td style="color:red">2.6%</td>
<td>-2.3%</td>
<td>-0.1%</td>
<td>8.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">PPI ex Energy</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>2.5%</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
<td style="color:red">3.0%</td>
<td>3.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="grey1">
<td colspan="7" class="firstcol">Euro area 13 Harmonized PPI excluding Construction</td>

</tr>
<tr class="grey1">
<td colspan="7" class="firstcol">The EA 13 countries are Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia and Spain.</td>

</tr>

</tbody>
</table>


</html>

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img class="small" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001d.jpg"><img class="small" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001e.jpg">
Results of the third quarter Tankan, the Bank of Japan&#39;s short term survey of business conditions of some 10,000 firms, released today, reveal, on balance, a subdued appraisal of business conditions and the immediate outlook. On the plus side, the excess of optimists over pessimists among large manufacturing corporations (the headline series) was 23%,<img class="small" align="left" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001f.jpg"> the same result as in the June and March Surveys. This was slightly better than these firms had forecast in June and was better than recent consensus estimates. However, there are now fewer large manufacturers who are positive on the outlook for the next quarter. The excess of optimists over pessimists is 19% for the fourth quarter. The actual results of the survey and the forecasts made one quarter earlier are shown in the first chart.
Among the more cautious indications, are a decline in the excess of optimists in the non manufacturing sector from 22% in the last three surveys to 20% in the current survey. This was 2 percentage points below the June forecast. The actual results and forecasts for the non manufacturing sector are shown in the second chart. (To the extent that the correlation is a good measure of goodness of fit, the forecasts in the non manufacturing sector appear to be more reliable than those in the manufacturing sector.)
Unfavorable trends were also apparent <img align="right" class="small" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001g.jpg">among the mid sized and small manufacturing firms. So far this year, excesses of optimists over pessimists in these firms have declined steadily. In September, the excess of mid-sized firms was 10%, down from 17% in the fourth quarter of 2006; the comparable figures for small firms were 1% from 10%. These data are shown in the third chart.
The September Tankan revealed some lessening of tightness in the labor market. However, a preponderance of firms are still reporting an excess of insufficient labor supply as can be seen in the fourth chart. In spite of tight labor conditions, nominal wages have been declining on a year over year basis. It was only in August that for the first time this year, nominal wages for all surveyed establishments of five or more employees were higher than those of a year ago, albeit, a mere 0.1%, as can be seen in the fifth chart. 

<img class="small" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001h.jpg"><img class="small" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001i.jpg">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">JAPAN TANKAN RESULTS&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">Q4 07</th>
<th scope="col">Q3 07&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">Q2 07&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">Q1 07&nbsp;&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">Q4 06</th>
<th scope="col">Q3 06</th>
<th scope="col">Q2 06</th>
<th scope="col">Q1 06</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Large Corporations Manufacturing Headline Series&nbsp; &nbsp; Actual&nbsp;</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>23</td>
<td>23</td>
<td>23</td>
<td>25</td>
<td>24</td>
<td>21</td>
<td>20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Forecast</td>
<td>19</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>21</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>19</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Large Corporations Non Manufacturing &nbsp; Actual</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol"> &nbsp;&nbsp;Forecast </td>
<td>19</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>21</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>19</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Medium Sized Manufactures</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>16</td>
<td>17</td>
<td>14</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Small Sized Manufactures</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>7</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Results of the third quarter Tankan, the Bank of Japan's short term survey of business conditions of some 10,000 firms, released today, reveal, on balance, a subdued appraisal of business conditions and the immediate outlook. On the [...]

A Mixed Picture From the Bank of Japan's TANKAN

Robert Brusca

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001k.jpg" width="353">
The finalized Euro area MFG PMIs from NTC show a picture of a weakening MFG sector. All countries for which up-to-date MFG readings are available show MFG is still expanding in September on a country by country basis in EMU (i.e. readings on the NTC index are still above 50). Yet the red monthly figures show period-to-period declines are now common and have been so for the region as a whole. All the large EMU economies (Germany, France, Italy and Spain) show month-to-month declines in MFG PMI for three straight months with the exception of Italy&#146;s m/m rise in August. If we view these reading as a time series and ask which of the MFG sectors is at reading that is low compared to its own history only France is below the mid-range mark. Its 50.51 reading in September is below the midpoint of the range for France since March of 2000. For EMU as a whole the MFG index is in about the 60th percentile of its range for this period. 
On balance, the EMU region is showing a loss in momentum. The EC Commission is complaining about the ill effects of a euro that is too strong. Manufacturing is fading in the Euro area although the current readings are still relatively firm and show ongoing expansion. But these readings are no longer strong and the momentum clearly points lower.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan=7 scope="col">NTC MFG Indexes</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;</td>
<td>Sep-07</td>
<td>Aug-07</td>
<td>3Mo</td>
<td>6Mo</td>
<td>12Mo</td>
<td>Percentile</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Euro-13</td>
<td style="color:red;">53.21</td>
<td style="color:red;">54.34</td>
<td>54.15</td>
<td>54.73</td>
<td>55.42</td>
<td>61.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Germany</td>
<td style="color:red;">54.87</td>
<td style="color:red;">55.96</td>
<td>55.86</td>
<td>56.33</td>
<td>57.22</td>
<td>73.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">France</td>
<td style="color:red;">50.51</td>
<td style="color:red;">52.55</td>
<td>52.13</td>
<td>53.06</td>
<td>53.75</td>
<td style="color:red;">37.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Italy</td>
<td style="color:red;">52.39</td>
<td>53.63</td>
<td>53.12</td>
<td>53.71</td>
<td>54.15</td>
<td>61.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Spain</td>
<td style="color:red;">50.80</td>
<td style="color:red;">52.16</td>
<td>52.06</td>
<td>53.42</td>
<td>54.89</td>
<td>53.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Austria</td>
<td>55.37</td>
<td>54.48</td>
<td>54.55</td>
<td>54.02</td>
<td>55.68</td>
<td>77.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Greece</td>
<td>53.83</td>
<td style="color:red;">53.56</td>
<td>53.78</td>
<td>53.68</td>
<td>52.97</td>
<td>63.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Ireland</td>
<td>54.35</td>
<td>54.32</td>
<td>53.92</td>
<td>53.50</td>
<td>53.02</td>
<td>86.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Netherlands</td>
<td>56.36</td>
<td style="color:red;">56.19</td>
<td>56.91</td>
<td>57.01</td>
<td>56.77</td>
<td>79.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="grey2">
<td colspan="7" class="firstcol">EU</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">UK</td>
<td style="color:red;">55.08</td>
<td>56.15</td>
<td>55.65</td>
<td>55.08</td>
<td>54.32</td>
<td>89.0%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

The finalized Euro area MFG PMIs from NTC show a picture of a weakening MFG sector. All countries for which up-to-date MFG readings are available show MFG is still expanding in September on a country by country basis in EMU (i.e. [...]

Broad Slowdown in Euro-area MFG

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001j.jpg" width="353">
The UK manufacturing sector was weaker than expected in September but output price pressures rose to a record high, according to the latest Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply/NTC survey. The headline UK September manufacturing index posted a level of 55.1, down from the now weaker 56.1 level registered in August. The reading still marks small gains on the three-month, six-month and year-over-year horizons for comparison (see table). Output prices rose to 57.8 in September from 56.0 in August, hitting their highest level since records began in 1999. The Bank of England has identified inflation as an upside inflation risk in the economy. This latest CIPS/NTC survey suggests that manufacturers are managing to push through price hikes. Nonetheless input prices eased to 62.3 from 63.8 in August, their lowest level since February. The pressure off input prices suggests that output price pressure should abate in the months ahead, possibly assuaging any concerns the BOE might have about the output price pressures. The decline in the headline activity index reflected a fall in the new orders index to 55.5 in September from 56.8 in August. Orders are now at their lowest level since January. Current output also fell to 58.2 from 60.5 in August. Moreover export orders plunged to 52.9 in September from 56.1 in the previous month. Other EU countries have been showing erratic readings for export strength. This slowing is part of a broader European pattern. 

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="9" scope="col">MFG PMI CIPS/NTC</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;</td>
<td colspan="3">Monthly readings</td>
<td colspan="3">Change over:</td>
<td>percentile</td>
</tr>
<tr class="grey3">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;</td>
<td>Sep-07</td>
<td>Aug-07</td>
<td>Jul-07</td>
<td>3MO</td>
<td>6MO</td>
<td>12MO</td>
<td>of range</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">MFG</td>
<td>55.08</td>
<td>56.15</td>
<td>55.71</td>
<td>0.38</td>
<td>0.68</td>
<td>0.55</td>
<td>69.4</td>
</tr>
<tr class="grey1">
<td colspan="8" class="firstcol">Range since January 1992</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

The UK manufacturing sector was weaker than expected in September but output price pressures rose to a record high, according to the latest Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply/NTC survey. The headline UK September [...]

UK MFG Drops Off but Remains in a Growth Profile

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001a.jpg" width="353">
The Composite Index of activity in the manufacturing sector, reported by the Institute of Supply Management (ISM), fell slightly last month to 52.0 from 52.9 during August. A reading above 50 indicates growth in factory sector activity. Consensus expectations had been for a reading of 52.5.
During the last twenty years there has been a 64% correlation between the level of the Composite Index and the three month growth in factory sector industrial production.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001b.jpg" width="353">
It is appropriate to correlate the ISM index level with factory sector growth because the ISM index is a diffusion index. It measures growth by being constructed using all of the absolute positive changes in activity added to one half of the no change in activity measures.
Declines in three of the index&#39;s five components accounted for the lower composite index. New orders fell for the third consecutive month. The 1.9 point drop left the index at its lowest since level since March. The production component fell for the second month in the last three. The drop in the inventories component was the last component moving down. The 3.8 point decline was to the lowest level since January.
Moving up was the employment index. The modest 0.4 point uptick, however, only recouped a piece of earlier declines. During the last twenty years there has been a 67% correlation between the level <img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001c.jpg" width="353"> of the ISM employment Index and the three month growth in factory sector employment. Finally, the 1.9 point rise in the supplier delivery index reversed about all of the sharp decline during August.
The index of new export orders moved lower. The sharp 2.5 point decline during August left the index at its lowest level since March. The import index, on the other hand, rose slightly but only reversed a bit of the huge declines earlier this year.
The prices index moved lower again, to its lowest level since January. Just 30% of the respondents reported an ability to raise prices. During the last twenty years there has been a 77% correlation between the price index and the three month change in the PPI for intermediate goods.
Systemic Risk and the International Lender of Last Resort is a speech by Federal Reserve Board Governor Frederic S. Mishkin and it is available <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/mishkin20070928a.htm"> here</a>. 

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col">&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">September</th>
<th scope="col">August</th>
<th scope="col">September &#39;06</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Composite Index</td>
<td>52.0</td>
<td>52.9</td>
<td>52.7</td>
<td>53.9</td>
<td>55.5</td>
<td>60.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; New Orders Index</td>
<td>53.4</td>
<td>55.3</td>
<td>54.2</td>
<td>55.4</td>
<td>57.4</td>
<td>63.5</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Prices Paid Index (NSA)</td>
<td>59.0</td>
<td>63.0</td>
<td>61.0</td>
<td>65.0</td>
<td>66.4</td>
<td>79.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

The Composite Index of activity in the manufacturing sector, reported by the Institute of Supply Management (ISM), fell slightly last month to 52.0 from 52.9 during August. A reading above 50 indicates growth in factory sector [...]

ISM Index Slightly Weaker

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001a.jpg" width="353">
The Composite Index of activity in the manufacturing sector, reported by the Institute of Supply Management (ISM), fell slightly last month to 52.0 from 52.9 during August. A reading above 50 indicates growth in factory sector activity. Consensus expectations had been for a reading of 52.5.
During the last twenty years there has been a 64% correlation between the level of the Composite Index and the three month growth in factory sector industrial production.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001b.jpg" width="353">
It is appropriate to correlate the ISM index level with factory sector growth because the ISM index is a diffusion index. It measures growth by being constructed using all of the absolute positive changes in activity added to one half of the no change in activity measures.
Declines in three of the index&#39;s five components accounted for the lower composite index. New orders fell for the third consecutive month. The 1.9 point drop left the index at its lowest since level since March. The production component fell for the second month in the last three. The drop in the inventories component was the last component moving down. The 3.8 point decline was to the lowest level since January.
Moving up was the employment index. The modest 0.4 point uptick, however, only recouped a piece of earlier declines. During the last twenty years there has been a 67% correlation between the level <img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001c.jpg" width="353"> of the ISM employment Index and the three month growth in factory sector employment. Finally, the 1.9 point rise in the supplier delivery index reversed about all of the sharp decline during August.
The index of new export orders moved lower. The sharp 2.5 point decline during August left the index at its lowest level since March. The import index, on the other hand, rose slightly but only reversed a bit of the huge declines earlier this year.
The prices index moved lower again, to its lowest level since January. Just 30% of the respondents reported an ability to raise prices. During the last twenty years there has been a 77% correlation between the price index and the three month change in the PPI for intermediate goods.
Systemic Risk and the International Lender of Last Resort is a speech by Federal Reserve Board Governor Frederic S. Mishkin and it is available <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/mishkin20070928a.htm"> here</a>. 

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col">&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">September</th>
<th scope="col">August</th>
<th scope="col">September &#39;06</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Composite Index</td>
<td>52.0</td>
<td>52.9</td>
<td>52.7</td>
<td>53.9</td>
<td>55.5</td>
<td>60.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; New Orders Index</td>
<td>53.4</td>
<td>55.3</td>
<td>54.2</td>
<td>55.4</td>
<td>57.4</td>
<td>63.5</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Prices Paid Index (NSA)</td>
<td>59.0</td>
<td>63.0</td>
<td>61.0</td>
<td>65.0</td>
<td>66.4</td>
<td>79.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
UK MFG Drops Off but Remains in a Growth Profile 
by <a href="/comment/Brusca.html">Robert Brusca</a> October 1, 2007


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001j.jpg" width="353">
The UK manufacturing sector was weaker than expected in September but output price pressures rose to a record high, according to the latest Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply/NTC survey. The headline UK September manufacturing index posted a level of 55.1, down from the now weaker 56.1 level registered in August. The reading still marks small gains on the three-month, six-month and year-over-year horizons for comparison (see table). Output prices rose to 57.8 in September from 56.0 in August, hitting their highest level since records began in 1999. The Bank of England has identified inflation as an upside inflation risk in the economy. This latest CIPS/NTC survey suggests that manufacturers are managing to push through price hikes. Nonetheless input prices eased to 62.3 from 63.8 in August, their lowest level since February. The pressure off input prices suggests that output price pressure should abate in the months ahead, possibly assuaging any concerns the BOE might have about the output price pressures. The decline in the headline activity index reflected a fall in the new orders index to 55.5 in September from 56.8 in August. Orders are now at their lowest level since January. Current output also fell to 58.2 from 60.5 in August. Moreover export orders plunged to 52.9 in September from 56.1 in the previous month. Other EU countries have been showing erratic readings for export strength. This slowing is part of a broader European pattern. 

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="9" scope="col">MFG PMI CIPS/NTC</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;</td>
<td colspan="3">Monthly readings</td>
<td colspan="3">Change over:</td>
<td>percentile</td>
</tr>
<tr class="grey3">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;</td>
<td>Sep-07</td>
<td>Aug-07</td>
<td>Jul-07</td>
<td>3MO</td>
<td>6MO</td>
<td>12MO</td>
<td>of range</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">MFG</td>
<td>55.08</td>
<td>56.15</td>
<td>55.71</td>
<td>0.38</td>
<td>0.68</td>
<td>0.55</td>
<td>69.4</td>
</tr>
<tr class="grey1">
<td colspan="8" class="firstcol">Range since January 1992</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Broad Slowdown in Euro-area MFG 
by <a href="/comment/Brusca.html">Robert Brusca</a> October 1, 2007


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001k.jpg" width="353">
The finalized Euro area MFG PMIs from NTC show a picture of a weakening MFG sector. All countries for which up-to-date MFG readings are available show MFG is still expanding in September on a country by country basis in EMU (i.e. readings on the NTC index are still above 50). Yet the red monthly figures show period-to-period declines are now common and have been so for the region as a whole. All the large EMU economies (Germany, France, Italy and Spain) show month-to-month declines in MFG PMI for three straight months with the exception of Italy&#146;s m/m rise in August. If we view these reading as a time series and ask which of the MFG sectors is at reading that is low compared to its own history only France is below the mid-range mark. Its 50.51 reading in September is below the midpoint of the range for France since March of 2000. For EMU as a whole the MFG index is in about the 60th percentile of its range for this period. 
On balance, the EMU region is showing a loss in momentum. The EC Commission is complaining about the ill effects of a euro that is too strong. Manufacturing is fading in the Euro area although the current readings are still relatively firm and show ongoing expansion. But these readings are no longer strong and the momentum clearly points lower.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan=7 scope="col">NTC MFG Indexes</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;</td>
<td>Sep-07</td>
<td>Aug-07</td>
<td>3Mo</td>
<td>6Mo</td>
<td>12Mo</td>
<td>Percentile</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Euro-13</td>
<td style="color:red;">53.21</td>
<td style="color:red;">54.34</td>
<td>54.15</td>
<td>54.73</td>
<td>55.42</td>
<td>61.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Germany</td>
<td style="color:red;">54.87</td>
<td style="color:red;">55.96</td>
<td>55.86</td>
<td>56.33</td>
<td>57.22</td>
<td>73.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">France</td>
<td style="color:red;">50.51</td>
<td style="color:red;">52.55</td>
<td>52.13</td>
<td>53.06</td>
<td>53.75</td>
<td style="color:red;">37.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Italy</td>
<td style="color:red;">52.39</td>
<td>53.63</td>
<td>53.12</td>
<td>53.71</td>
<td>54.15</td>
<td>61.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Spain</td>
<td style="color:red;">50.80</td>
<td style="color:red;">52.16</td>
<td>52.06</td>
<td>53.42</td>
<td>54.89</td>
<td>53.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Austria</td>
<td>55.37</td>
<td>54.48</td>
<td>54.55</td>
<td>54.02</td>
<td>55.68</td>
<td>77.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Greece</td>
<td>53.83</td>
<td style="color:red;">53.56</td>
<td>53.78</td>
<td>53.68</td>
<td>52.97</td>
<td>63.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Ireland</td>
<td>54.35</td>
<td>54.32</td>
<td>53.92</td>
<td>53.50</td>
<td>53.02</td>
<td>86.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Netherlands</td>
<td>56.36</td>
<td style="color:red;">56.19</td>
<td>56.91</td>
<td>57.01</td>
<td>56.77</td>
<td>79.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="grey2">
<td colspan="7" class="firstcol">EU</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">UK</td>
<td style="color:red;">55.08</td>
<td>56.15</td>
<td>55.65</td>
<td>55.08</td>
<td>54.32</td>
<td>89.0%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
A Mixed Picture From the Bank of Japan's TANKAN  
by <a href="/comment/Curley.html">Louise Curley</a> October 1, 2007


<img class="small" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001d.jpg"><img class="small" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001e.jpg">
Results of the third quarter Tankan, the Bank of Japan&#39;s short term survey of business conditions of some 10,000 firms, released today, reveal, on balance, a subdued appraisal of business conditions and the immediate outlook. On the plus side, the excess of optimists over pessimists among large manufacturing corporations (the headline series) was 23%,<img class="small" align="left" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001f.jpg"> the same result as in the June and March Surveys. This was slightly better than these firms had forecast in June and was better than recent consensus estimates. However, there are now fewer large manufacturers who are positive on the outlook for the next quarter. The excess of optimists over pessimists is 19% for the fourth quarter. The actual results of the survey and the forecasts made one quarter earlier are shown in the first chart.
Among the more cautious indications, are a decline in the excess of optimists in the non manufacturing sector from 22% in the last three surveys to 20% in the current survey. This was 2 percentage points below the June forecast. The actual results and forecasts for the non manufacturing sector are shown in the second chart. (To the extent that the correlation is a good measure of goodness of fit, the forecasts in the non manufacturing sector appear to be more reliable than those in the manufacturing sector.)
Unfavorable trends were also apparent <img align="right" class="small" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001g.jpg">among the mid sized and small manufacturing firms. So far this year, excesses of optimists over pessimists in these firms have declined steadily. In September, the excess of mid-sized firms was 10%, down from 17% in the fourth quarter of 2006; the comparable figures for small firms were 1% from 10%. These data are shown in the third chart.
The September Tankan revealed some lessening of tightness in the labor market. However, a preponderance of firms are still reporting an excess of insufficient labor supply as can be seen in the fourth chart. In spite of tight labor conditions, nominal wages have been declining on a year over year basis. It was only in August that for the first time this year, nominal wages for all surveyed establishments of five or more employees were higher than those of a year ago, albeit, a mere 0.1%, as can be seen in the fifth chart. 

<img class="small" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001h.jpg"><img class="small" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/071001i.jpg">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">JAPAN TANKAN RESULTS&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">Q4 07</th>
<th scope="col">Q3 07&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">Q2 07&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">Q1 07&nbsp;&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">Q4 06</th>
<th scope="col">Q3 06</th>
<th scope="col">Q2 06</th>
<th scope="col">Q1 06</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Large Corporations Manufacturing Headline Series&nbsp; &nbsp; Actual&nbsp;</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>23</td>
<td>23</td>
<td>23</td>
<td>25</td>
<td>24</td>
<td>21</td>
<td>20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Forecast</td>
<td>19</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>21</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>19</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Large Corporations Non Manufacturing &nbsp; Actual</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol"> &nbsp;&nbsp;Forecast </td>
<td>19</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>21</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>19</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Medium Sized Manufactures</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>16</td>
<td>17</td>
<td>14</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Small Sized Manufactures</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>7</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Job openings less than the number unemployed in July for first time since 2021

Reaccelerating goods price inflation along with sticky services inflation clouds the outlook

Falling oil prices aren't pulling down inflation expectations, pointing to a boost from increased tariffs

Equity market exuberance outpacing macroeconomic data

Apart from Japan, Blue Chip forecasters expect further sizable monetary easing

US production rebounded in Q2, but demand continued to slow

US leader, Germany trailer for real GDP growth over past 3 years

Negative US inflation surprises leading G10 down

Deflation continues in China

Incoming data surprising on downside in US; positive surprises elsewhere

FOMC expects more inflation and less growth than in March

With escalation of Israel/Iran conflict, geopolitical risk has recently surged while US trade policy uncertainty has ebbed

Renewed supply chain pressures point to a rebound in global inflation ahead

Apart from Japan, Blue Chip forecasters look for further significant monetary policy easing

Apart from the US, productivity is moribund

Financial market concerns ebb even though policy uncertainty continues to soar

US tariff revenues nearly doubled in April

Even with expected tariff-induced increases in inflation, BCFF forecasters look for a more aggressive round of monetary easing

USD/EUR exchange rate uncoupling from interest rate differential

Widespread downgrading of 2025 GDP outlook

Trade and fiscal policy uncertainty has exploded with the new administration

Much lower US electricity costs gives it a competitive advantage

Wage growth slowing in the US and Euro area; elevated and sticky in the UK

Stagflation-lite: Blue Chip forecasts below-trend growth and elevated inflation

US policy gyrations boosting policy uncertainty worldwide

Our global data offering is unparalleled in terms of coverage, quality, and organization. We offer 290+ databases from 2500 government and private sources, a wealth of key survey and forecast data covering the world’s economies, and a robust offering of archive databases that drive machine learning for big data applications.

Optimized for precision analytics, our data is seamlessly integrated with Microsoft Office and all leading statistical packages through our DLX® software and platform independent HaverView™ website. We further offer direct database feeds, client server or cloud-based delivery, and RESTful API.


Privacy Policy

Disclaimer

Contact us

A premier time series data platform for the global strategy, research, and quant communities. 

London

Singapore

Tokyo

New York

Economy in Brief

Viewpoints

Contact Us

Our Data

Our Products

What We Do

Our Authors

About Us

Data News

Resources

Release Calendars

Training Center

Webinars

Newsletters

Download Software

For Clients

Live Updates

Tian Yong Woon

This week, we review the state of play in Southeast Asia and Australia. In Thailand, political uncertainty lingers after the removal of former Prime Minister Paetongtarn, with investors now eyeing fresh elections in the coming months. The ongoing political flux has only deepened concerns over Thailand’s persistent economic underperformance relative to regional peers (chart 1). Indonesia, too, has faced recent political turmoil, as protests over lawmakers’ housing allowances turned violent. While tensions have since eased and financial markets partially recovered (chart 2), the episode highlighted the fragility of investor confidence.

Elsewhere in Southeast Asia, some economies are pressing ahead. Malaysia has made significant strides in establishing itself as a global tech hub, supported by robust direct investment flows (chart 3). Vietnam, likewise, continues to position itself as a manufacturing and electronics powerhouse. Its strong export performance has driven growth but also drawn scrutiny, particularly as the US trade deficit with Vietnam has widened alongside rising imports (chart 4).

In the Pacific, Australia has shown encouraging signs, with Q2 GDP growth outperforming expectations on the back of stronger household consumption (chart 5). This has bolstered expectations that the RBA will pause rate cuts at its month-end meeting. Even so, close attention remains on the labour market (chart 6), potential headwinds from US tariffs, and a broader productivity challenge.

**Thailand**
Thailand continues to struggle to regain its footing, weighed down by ongoing political turmoil. Former Prime Minister Paetongtarn was removed from office by the Constitutional Court in late August, following her July 1st suspension over a leaked phone call with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen. In her place, lawmakers elected former Deputy Prime Minister Anutin as the new premier. However, as part of the deal that secured his appointment, Anutin has pledged to dissolve parliament within four months and call a general election. This political upheaval compounds Thailand’s broader economic challenges. Growth has persistently lagged behind its Southeast Asian peers (chart 1), with tourism—a key revenue source—stalled and still short of pre-pandemic levels. At a time when deeper reforms are needed to unlock the country’s full potential, Thailand instead faces prolonged political flux, leaving policy clarity and direction uncertain even as neighbours forge ahead.

250908T1.jpg

**Indonesia**
Thailand is not alone in Southeast Asia in grappling with political turmoil. Indonesia has recently faced its own unrest, as initially peaceful demonstrations against housing allowances for lawmakers turned violent after a motorbike taxi driver was fatally struck by a police vehicle during an earlier rally in Jakarta. Although protests have since subsided, the turmoil comes on the heels of policy moves that have already unsettled some investors. Concerns have centred on the fiscal strain from large-scale spending programs such as Prime Minister Prabowo’s free school meals initiative. While the program is well-intentioned—aimed at reducing poverty and improving child development—its hefty cost implies spending cuts elsewhere and higher taxes, fuelling unease. Markets have reflected these concerns, with Indonesian equities and the rupiah selling off during the recent protests, though both have staged a partial rebound as tensions eased (chart 2).

250908T2.jpg

**Malaysia**
While Thailand and Indonesia have been grappling with political woes, other Southeast Asian economies have pressed ahead. Malaysia, for instance, has made notable strides in establishing itself as a global tech hub, with significant advances in semiconductors—largely centred in Penang—and, more recently, in electric vehicles, where Malacca is emerging as a key industry hub. These developments have been fuelled in part by strong foreign investment flows, which, while healthy in recent years (chart 3), slipped to a five-year low in Q2 2025 on a directional basis. Still, Malaysia’s semiconductor push remains robust: Prime Minister Anwar announced earlier this year that the country had already secured more than 63 billion ringgit ($14.9 billion) in semiconductor investments, mostly from foreign sources, under its National Semiconductor Strategy—less than a year after the scheme’s launch. More broadly, Malaysia has pressed ahead on multiple fronts in its drive toward high-income status by 2030—an ambition that is looking increasingly attainable.

250908T3.jpg

**Vietnam**
Moving to Vietnam, the economy—like Malaysia’s—has been pushing hard to establish itself as a manufacturing and electronics hub. Vietnam continues to outpace its ASEAN peers in growth and shares Malaysia’s ambition of reaching high-income status, though with a later target of 2045. Its export boom has been central to past success but has also drawn scrutiny, particularly as the US trade deficit with Vietnam has widened with rising imports (chart 4). As a result, Vietnam now faces a more constrained trade environment even as it relies on exports as a key growth driver. For now, Vietnam has avoided a worst-case scenario with the US: a recent trade deal reduced the reciprocal tariff rate from a potential 46% to 20%, though US-perceived “transshipments” will still be hit with a 40% tariff. Beyond navigating this delicate global landscape, Vietnam is also instigating deep structural reforms—such as strengthening the role of the private sector—to sustain growth and meet its long-term development goals.

250908T4.jpg

**Australia**
Moving to the Pacific, Australia is among the few economies relatively insulated from US tariffs, facing only the baseline 10% rate under the revised tariff schedule that took effect in early August. On the domestic front, Australia’s economy outperformed expectations in Q2, with real GDP growth accelerating to 1.8% y/y. The pickup was driven by stronger household consumption (chart 5), offering an encouraging signal for the outlook and easing earlier concerns about economic momentum—perhaps also suggesting that the central bank’s earlier rate cuts are beginning to take effect. 

250908T5.jpg

Turning to monetary policy, the recent upbeat data have reinforced expectations that the RBA will hold rates steady at its September meeting, after cutting a cumulative 75 bps since the start of the year. That said, markets are still pricing in further easing down the line, supported by Australia’s disinflationary trend (chart 6) and lingering downside risks from weaker global demand amid US trade tariffs. Another key dimension is the labour market, which remains tight but has shown signs of softening in recent months. A broader concern is productivity, which has stagnated in recent quarters, raising questions about the sustainability of real wage growth.

250908T6.jpg

Asia

Economic Letter from Asia: Political Woes

250905A2.jpg

250905B2.jpg

Nonfarm payrolls increased 22,000 during August after rising 79,000 in July, revised from 73,000 and falling 13,000 during June, revised from a 14,000 increase. Expectations had been for an 83,000 rise in the Action Economics Forecast Survey. The three-month average change in payrolls of 29,300 compared to 28,300 in July, but stood far below its high of 231,700 in January.

Average hourly earnings rose an expected 0.3% in August after unrevised gains of 0.3% in July and 0.2% in June. Earnings growth of 3.7% y/y equals that in June which is the lowest since July 2024, but has been trending lower from its 5.9% high in March 2022.

The unemployment rate, measured in the household survey, edged up m/m to an expected 4.3% from 4.2% in July and 4.1% in June. It reached a low of 3.4% in April 2023. The unemployment rate, including employees working part-time for economic reasons plus all marginally-attached workers, rose to 8.1% last month from 7.9% In July. It was 6.6% in April 2023.

In the **establishment survey**, private-sector employment in August rose 38,000 after rising 77,000 in July.  Factory sector jobs declined 12,000, off for the fourth straight month. Durable goods employment fell 19,000 after rising 5,000, as motor vehicle & parts hiring declined 7,300 after a 2,000 July gain. Nondurables employment rose 7,000, reversing a 7,000 July decline. Construction sector employment weakened 7,000, down for the third straight month. The number of mining & logging industry jobs declined 6,000, also registering the fourth consecutive month of decline.

Private service-sector employment increased 63,000 during August after improving 85,000 in July. Increases varied greatly amongst service-sector categories. Private education & health sector employment rose 46,000 last month, following a 77,000 increase in July. The number of leisure & hospitality jobs rose 28,000 after a 6,000 gain. Trade, transportation & utilities employment gained 2,000, following a 5,000 increase, but financial activities employment weakened 3,000 after increasing 9,000 in July. The number of professional & business services jobs fell 17,000, down for the fourth straight month as temporary help employment declined 9,800, also off for the fourth month in a row. Information sector employment declined 5,000, after falling 7,000 in July and 3,000 in June. Transportation & warehousing hiring weakened 3,600 last month following a 6,300 drop.

Government sector payrolls declined 16,000 last month following a 2,000 rise. Federal government employment weakened 15,000 and has fallen for seven straight months. State government payrolls declined 13,000 after falling in each of the prior three months. To the upside, local government hiring rose 12,000 following a 17,000 July increase.

Private-sector average hourly earnings rose 0.3% (3.7% y/y) in August, the same as in July. Earnings in the goods-producing sector increased 0.4% (4.0% y/y) in August, double the July rise. In construction, earnings rose 0.6% (4.2% y/y) following a 0.3% rise, while factory sector earnings improved 0.3% (3.9% y/y) after a 0.2% gain. In the service sector, earnings rose 0.3% (3.6% y/y) in August, the same as in July. Professional & business services pay increased 0.4% (5.0% y/y) for the second consecutive month while leisure & hospitality earnings also increased 0.4% (3.7% y/y) after two straight months of 0.3% increase. Information earnings rose 0.2% (4.6% y/y) for the second straight month.

250905C2.jpg

250905D2.jpg

The length of the average workweek was 34.2 hours in August for the third straight month. The workweek in the goods-producing sector eased to 39.8 hours from 39.9 hours in July. The construction sector average workweek held at 39.0 hours while the factory sector workweek eased to 40.0 hours from 40.2 hours. The average workweek in the private service sector held at 33.2 hours. Information sector hours edged up to 37.0 from 36.9. Financial activities hours held at 37.6. Private education & health services hours eased to 32.7 from 32.8 in July.

In the **household survey**, the unemployment rate increased to 4.3% in August after rising to 4.2% in July from 4.1% in June as employment rose 288,000 after falling 260,000 in July and the size of the labor force increased 436,000 after three straight months of decline. The labor force participation rate rose to 62.3% last month from 62.2%, remaining well below the high of 63.3% early in 2020. The rate for teenagers eased to 34.8%, a five-year low. For workers aged 20-24, the rate plunged to 70.2%, a four year-low. For workers aged 25-54, the participation rate increased to 83.7%, an eleven-month high. For individuals 55 and over, the rate held steady at 38.1% but remained near a 20-year low of 38.0% in June.

The employment/population ratio for all workers steadied at 59.6% last month. It remained below the peak reading of 61.1% in February, 2020 just prior to the pandemic. For men, the rate rose to 65.0% from 64.7% in July and for women, the rate eased to 54.5 % on the heels of a slip to 54.7% in July.

The employment and earnings data are collected from surveys taken each month during the week containing the 12th day of the month. The labor market data are contained in Haver's **USECON** database. Detailed figures are in the **EMPL** and **LABOR** databases. The expectations figures are in the **AS1REPNA** database.

250905X2.jpg

250905F2.jpg

- Hiring weakens broadly; factory, construction & government jobs decline.
- Earnings gain slows y/y.
- Unemployment rate increases as job growth lags rise in labor force.

U.S. Payroll Employment Report Reveals Unexpected Weakness in August; Earnings Rise Steadily, but Jobless Rate Increases

250905E.jpg

Germany's factory orders declined for the third straight month in July. Real new orders fell 2.9% month-on-month in July, against expectations for a small increase. The drop was sharper than a 0.2% decrease in June; foreign orders declined 3.1% in July, as orders from the euro area contracted 3.8%, and orders from outside the euro area fell by 2.8%. These metrics suggest that demand both inside and outside the euro area remains weak. Domestic orders dropped 2.5% in July, an exact offset to their gain in June. When ranked on growth rates over the last 30 years, all three sector growth rates are below their medians (below a ranking of 50%). However, when ranked on the real index number level, total orders rank at their 55.6 percentile, foreign orders rank at their 79.5 percentile and domestic orders rank at their 15.2 percentile. All-in-all it’s an unimpressive report.

**Orders sequentially and QTD:** Sequential trends are ambivalent but still clearly weak. Sequential growth rates do not show a clear acceleration/deceleration pattern. But for total, foreign and domestic real orders, both 3-month and 12-month growth rates are negative (one exception: foreign orders over 12 months). Domestic orders show negative growth over 6 months as well. Quarter-to-date growth rates are negative for all sectors.

**Sales trends:** Real sales are mixed in July, rising 0.9% overall on declines in two sectors: consumer durables and intermediate goods. Sector sales mostly maintain growth as manufacturing sales are positive based on growth rates over 12 months, 6 months, and 3 months. Consumer goods and intermediate goods sales show deceleration and ongoing contraction. Consumer durable goods and intermediate goods show QTD declines. On the manufacturing & mining to total, manufacturing and capital goods show index standings above their respective 50% on 30 years of data. That also shows above-median growth rates on annual data along with consumer goods and consumer nondurable goods.

**Industrial confidence:** Industrial confidence measures for Germany, France, Italy, and Spain, the four largest EMU members, show improved (but still net negative readings) in July compared to June. Over three months and six months, Germany and Italy show some improvement; France still shows steady deterioration. Spain shows improvement over 3 months and it is only slight improvement. The queue standings for the industrial reading over 30 years of data show Spain with an above-median reading in July. Germany and France are exceptionally weak and Italy has been weaker only 26% of the time based on the queue standing measure. Not only are German orders and demand weak and faltering but the broad EU Commission measures of industrial confidence show broadly weak readings for the largest economies in the EMU.

250905.jpg

Germany

German Factory Orders Plunge on Domestic Weakness

Andrew Cates

**Gold prices and trade policy uncertainty**
This week’s record-breaking surge in gold prices has coincided with renewed volatility in trade policy uncertainty, reflecting the market’s heightened sensitivity to political and legal developments in Washington. A series of legislative challenges to the administration’s latest tariff measures has raised the prospect that parts of the policy framework could be overturned or significantly diluted. That possibility has injected another layer of uncertainty into an already fragile trade environment, amplifying demand for gold as a hedge. Investors appear to be weighing not only the inflationary risks of tariffs that remain in place but also the destabilizing effects of unpredictable policy reversals, leaving gold prices at historic highs and the trade policy uncertainty index elevated.

250904Z1.jpg

**US Tariffs**
Although the data in this chart extend only through June 2025, they clearly illustrate which trading partners would gain the most if US tariff policies were to be reversed. China stands out as the most heavily penalised, with effective tariff rates rising by more than 25 percentage points in just six months. Japan and South Korea have also faced significant tariff hikes, suggesting that their exporters would benefit substantially from any policy rollback. Taiwan, India, and the EU also feature prominently, though at more moderate levels. By contrast, ASEAN economies, Australia, and the UK have seen relatively smaller increases, leaving them less exposed. In aggregate, a broad reversal of tariffs would most immediately alleviate the pressure on East Asian exporters—particularly China—while also reducing costs for US importers and consumers who have been disproportionately affected by higher prices on goods from the region.

250904Z2.jpg

**The Indian economy and US trade policy** 
India faces a particularly sharp squeeze from the latest wave of US tariff hikes, given that the US now absorbs nearly one-fifth of its exports. The imposition of higher barriers has dealt a direct blow to key sectors, such as textiles and jewellery, while also undermining investor confidence. That pressure is clearly visible in the sharp depreciation of India’s trade-weighted currency, which has accelerated in 2025. Rather than offering a competitiveness boost, the weaker rupee has compounded difficulties by lifting import costs and stoking inflation at home. The result is that tariffs have both curtailed India’s export earnings and strained its domestic economy, leaving policymakers with limited options beyond seeking trade diversification and targeted support measures.

250904Z3.jpg

**Global monetary policy** 
The latest Blue Chip Financial Forecasts survey helps explain why equity markets have remained upbeat despite escalating geopolitical and trade tensions. The survey points to an expected sizeable policy easing over the coming year, particularly in the US and UK where forecasters anticipate close to a full percentage point of rate cuts. Australia and Canada are also projected to deliver meaningful reductions, while the euro area is expected to ease more modestly. Japan stands out as the exception, with expectations tilted toward further tightening. For equities, these projections of broad-based rate cuts provide a crucial cushion—supporting valuations, lowering discount rates, and reinforcing the sense that policymakers are prepared to offset the drag from tariffs and slowing global growth.

250904Z4.jpg

**Euro area inflation** 
By contrast with the US and UK, where forecasters in the latest Blue Chip Financial Forecasts survey anticipate close to a full percentage point of rate cuts, expectations for the ECB are more restrained. This reflects the fact that the ECB has already delivered a relatively large degree of policy easing, while headline inflation has now fallen back to levels close to its target. Even so, further rate reductions remain likely if underlying price pressures continue to moderate. As the chart shows, services inflation has begun to move lower in line with a clear decline in wage growth, suggesting that disinflationary momentum is building. Should this trend persist, the ECB will have scope to add to its easing cycle, though at a slower and more cautious pace than peers such as the Fed or the Bank of England.

250904Z5.jpg

**Prices and cost pressures in the US corporate sector** 
Corporate profitability has long been one of the best leading signals for US equity cycles, and the measure here (Non-financial corporate profits per unit of output – i.e. profit margins) has slipped from its late-2023 peak and moved sideways for much of the past year. That’s not a collapse, but it does raise questions about how long equities can keep rising without stronger profit momentum. The recent Q2 uptick—a 1.8% annualised gain—came despite a hefty rise in non-labour costs, with margins protected by modest pricing power and a notable 2.2% drop in unit labour costs. Whether that labour relief reflects softer wage pressures or a structural productivity boost—potentially tied to AI—will be crucial in determining if profits can remain resilient, or if this plateau is the prelude to a downturn.

250904Z6.jpg

Equity markets have lost a little ground in recent days and bond markets have been more jittery, as legal challenges to US tariff policies add to a tense backdrop of geopolitical meetings between China, Russia, and India. Gold’s surge to record highs arguably captures the search for safe havens amid this uncertainty (chart 1), while the possibility of tariff reversals keeps alive the prospect of relief for the most affected exporters, notably China, Japan, and South Korea (chart 2). India’s position looks more precarious, with its reliance on the US market colliding with a weakening trade-weighted currency as tariffs bite into growth and investor confidence (chart 3). Monetary policy expectations, however, continue to offer some support, with the latest Blue Chip Financial Forecasts survey pointing to sizeable easing in the US and UK (chart 4). The ECB is expected to tread more cautiously after earlier cuts and with headline inflation now near target. Still, if inflation continues to ease, further action remains possible (chart 5). In the US, corporate resilience is also helping offset some of the gloom: despite tariff-driven spikes in non-labour costs, falling unit labour costs—possibly aided by AI productivity gains—and firmer prices allowed profits per unit of output to rise in Q2 (chart 6).

<iframe data-testid="embed-iframe" style="border-radius:12px" src="https://open.spotify.com/embed/episode/0sd6yLt6aGEGOdVpZ2VZbW?utm_source=generator" width="100%" height="152" frameBorder="0" allowfullscreen="" allow="autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; fullscreen; picture-in-picture" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Charts of the Week: A Few Cuts More

250904N12.jpg

250904O12.jpg

The U.S. ISM Services PMI increased to 52.0 in August after falling to 50.1 in July from 50.8 in June, according to the Institute for Supply Management. The index had been declining since it reached 53.5 in February. The index hit a recent high of 55.8 in October of last year and remains below the all-time high of 67.5 in November 2021. The Action Economics Forecast Survey expected a reading of 51.0 for August.

The ISM Composite Index combines the services index and the manufacturing index released on Tuesday. This index rose to 51.6 in August from 49.8 in July. This also was the highest level in six months.

Amongst the services component series, the business activity index rose to 55.0 last month after falling to 52.6 in July. Twenty-three percent (NSA) of respondents reported improved activity while 14.2% reported decline. The new orders index increased to 56.0 from 50.3 in July. Twenty-seven percent (NSA) of respondents reported improved orders while a lessened 16.2% reported decline. The employment series was little-changed in August at 46.5, after falling from 47.2 in June. A lessened 10.3% (NSA) of respondents reported increased employment while a lower 16.8% reported decline. Working lower, the supplier delivery series fell to 50.3 in August after rising to 51.0 in July. Four percent of respondents (NSA) reported faster delivery speeds while 4.5% reported slower speeds.

On the inflation front, the prices index eased to 69.2 after surging to 69.9 in July. A lessened 36.7% (NSA) of respondents reported higher prices while 2.6% reported lower prices. The index has increased from its December 2023 53.1.

Additionally, the new export orders index eased to 47.3 (NSA) in July following a decline to 47.9 in July. Twelve percent of survey respondents reported higher exports while 16.9% reported decline. The imports index surged to 54.6 last month after falling to 45.9 in July. A higher 18.9%% of respondents reported higher imports while a lessened 9.8% reported decline. The inventory change index rose to 53.2 from 51.8 and the order backlog index fell to 40.4 in August after rising to 44.3 in July. These series are not seasonally adjusted and not included in the ISM Services PMI total.

The ISM Services PMI is a composite index consisting of four equally weighted diffusion indexes: Business Activity, New Orders, Employment, and Supplier Deliveries. A reading above 50 indicates expansion in the services sector, while below 50 suggests contraction. Supplier Deliveries is the only ISM index that is inversed; a reading above 50 indicates slower deliveries.

The ISM figures are available in Haver's **USECON** database, with additional detail in the **SURVEYS** database. The expectations figure from Action Economics is in the **AS1REPNA** database.

250904P12.jpg

250904Q12.jpg

- Total index rebounds to six-month high.	
- Business activity and new orders improve.
- Prices index eases.

Economy in Brief: 2007

Jump to:

Profitability of all Nonfinancial UK Corporations: A Record High in the Second Quarter

Weekly U.S. Chain Store Sales Remained Low

Weekly U.S. Chain Store Sales Remained Low

A Mixed Picture From the Bank of Japan's TANKAN

Broad Slowdown in Euro-area MFG

UK MFG Drops Off but Remains in a Growth Profile

ISM Index Slightly Weaker

ISM Index Slightly Weaker