Economy in Brief

Manufacturing output in the European Monetary Union (EMU) continues to show countries struggling to make sustained gains. In the table, EMU members are early reporters of IP data. Manufacturing statistics in August show five of those thirteen countries have declining output. In July, six of them showed declines; in June, five showed declines. Slightly more than half of the reporters do show increases on a month-to-month basis. But the margin between the number with output increasing and decreasing is not impressive. The median increase among these members in August shows IP up by 0.2%, in July the median increase was 0.4%, the same as in June. Despite the mixed nature of these statistics, the median on balance shows consistent monthly increases in output in June, July, and August. However, over these same months, the proportion of reporters showing output accelerating is generally disappointing. In June about 54% of the reporters show output accelerating, in July that fell back to 38.5%, in August that proportion improved only slightly to 41.7%. In each of the last two months, fewer than half of the reporters were showing an acceleration in output.

Sequential data details Sequential data that look at these same countries’ annualized output growth over 12 months, six months and three months show more seriously mixed and weak economic conditions. Over three months, seven of the thirteen reporters show declines in output. Over six months, eight reporters show a decline in output, and over 12 months, seven of the reporters show a decline in output. Once again, the split between the number of countries reporting output increases and decreases is only a narrow margin, but on these horizons, there are slightly more countries reporting declines than increases.

Sequential trends Not surprisingly, the sequential data show median output changes with declines. Over 12 months, the median decline rate is -0.7%, over six months it's almost the same, at -0.6%, but over three months the output decline worsens to -4.1%. These are all based on data surveyed at an annual rate. If we look at the underlying trend for output over 12 months, 75% of the reporters show output accelerating, but over six months only 33.3% show output accelerating, and over three months only 45.5% show output accelerating.

The bottom line for manufacturing output in the EMU is that monthly conditions are mixed, and the broader sequential data are showing more weakness and more of a tendency to weakness.

Quarter-to-date The quarter-to-date shows seven monetary union economies with output declining; this is two-months into the third quarter. There is some strength, but the strongest reporter is Ireland where output data are notoriously volatile; still in the quarter-to-date, Irish output is up at a 50% annual rate; output in Finland shows a 14% annual rate increase; Belgium shows about a 13% annual rate increase. Those are encouraging numbers; however, on the negative side, there are double-digit growth rates posted by Luxembourg, Malta, Greece, and Portugal. For the most part, these are small or middle-sized European economies, but Europe's largest economy, Germany also shows a quarter-to-date decline in output at a 7% annual rate, with Italy, the 3rd largest economy, showing a 6.7% decline in output at an annual rate. Spain in the EMU’s 4th largest economy; it shows output declining at a 7.5% annual rate. Among the big four European economies, only France with output up at a 1.6% annual rate has an increase in the quarter-to-date.

IP growth is undernourished Growth rates for industrial production are generally below par with the average growth rate; on data back to 2006 at the average percentile rank standing for output growth across these countries is 39.5%. That compares to a median ranking at a 42-percentile standing. Both these calculations show that the average or median growth rate for these 13 countries is weak. The representative growth rate for this group is below the countries’ respective medians for the period. In August, only Belgium, Malta, Ireland, and Greece have percentile standings for their growth rates year-over-year that are in excess of the ranking of 50% putting them above their historic medians. By comparison, the BIG-4 economies in the monetary union show growth rates that rank much weaker in their historic profiles. Listed by the relative size of their economies, Germany has a growth rate with a 20.5 percentile standing, France has a growth rate with a 43.3 percentile standing, Italy has a growth rate with a 15.6 percentile standing and Spain has a growth rate with a 25.4 percentile standing. The BIG-4 economies are relatively much weaker than the rest of the monetary union.

Momentum In terms of momentum, the large economies are split with Germany showing an acceleration in output culminating in a growth rate of 7.9% at an annual rate over three months. France shows the same tendency with weak growth rates over six months and 12 months progressing to a 10.4% annual rate of growth over three months. Italy, however, shows slippage with growth rates that are negative on all horizons and with the largest negative growth rate at -7.7% over three months. Spain also shows a progression towards weakness. Spain's progression is severe with output falling 3.7% over 12 months, falling at a 19.4% annual rate over six months and plunging at a 27.1% annual rate over three months.

Conditions in the monetary union remain mixed with a clear tilt toward weakness and with countries generally showing manufacturing sectors that are producing weaker than average results compared to historic performance.

Japan's economy watchers index took a step back in September after rising in August. The step back takes the September level down to just a few ticks above its value in July. The future index for the economy watchers survey also edged lower, although not as definitively as the current index; it fell to 49.7 in September from 50.3 in August, still above its July value by more than a point. Ranked on data back to 2002, the current economy watchers index has a queue standing in its 53rd percentile, putting it just slightly above its median for that period. The median on ranked data occurs at a ranking of 50%. The future index is slightly stronger with a ranking on the same timeline at about its 59th percentile.

Performance overview Both the current and the future indexes show widespread declines in diffusion values in September compared to August. In the current index, only the rating for eating and drinking establishments shows improvement in September; for the future index there are increases in the services index and in the reading for overall employment. Both the current and the future indexes are below the 50 threshold, which on the diffusion index implies a decline in activity. Looking at components, the current index has only one value - that for eating and drinking establishments - above 50 and has a reading for nonmanufacturing establishments exactly at 50. For the future index, the services reading has a diffusion value above 50 along with employment index and eating and drinking establishments; the reading for manufacturers is at 50.1, barely above 50.

Changes in index values; momentum Looking at changes in the current and future indexes over three months, six months and 12 months, both surveys show improvements over three months preceded by net declines over six months and over 12 months. The current index shows a continuous decline over three months, six months and 12 months for the retail sector, as well as for services. In contrast, it shows steady improvements over three months, six months and 12 months in manufacturing. The future index does not show any steady stream of sequential deterioration; however, it shows steady improvement with gains on all three horizons for services, for manufacturing firms, and for employment conditions.

Reading level evaluations Current- The queue percentile readings calculated on data back to 2002 show the current index at a standing of 53 percentile, above its historic median; however, there are below median readings in retailing and services and for employment - with employment having a particularly worrisome, weak standing in its 29th percentile. That means that the employment reading has been weaker than this, only about 29% of the time. In terms of strong standings, only eating and drinking establishments have a standing above the 80th percentile with an 87.7 percentile standing.

Future- By comparison, the future index has a stronger headline standing at 58.9 percentile and has two component readings with standings in their 80th percentiles for eating and drinking establishments and for services. The future index has two relatively weak readings that are below their 50th percentile mark; those are for housing and for employment. The housing standing is in its 34th percentile, a relatively weak standing; employment doesn't do much better with a standing at the 43.9 percentile.

A difficult employment scenario Employment scores out as weak in both the current and in the future standings although the future metrics show that employment has been improving over three months, six months and 12 months; in the current survey, employment only improves on balance over three months. Moreover, in the current survey the employment diffusion index falls by nearly a point month-to-month, while in the future survey the employment reading gains by nearly a point.

Summing up The economy watchers index shows a relatively broad weakening for conditions in September. While the economy watcher indexes continue to log levels above their historic medians, both the future and the current standings are showing some degree of decline in activity in September. Manufacturing tends to be a bellwether industry for Japan; it shows consistent improvement over 12 months, six months and three months in the current survey as well as in the future survey And manufacturing has above-median standings in both surveys although the standings are particularly strong; on the future reading has a diffusion value above 50. Because of the declines in September, we have to mark the survey overall as disappointing; however, there are some positive aspects in the report, particularly for the manufacturing sector.