Tom Moeller

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061106a.jpg" width="353">
The 3Q &#39;06 Composite Business Index published by the Manufacturers&#39; Alliance/MAPI fell for the second quarter to 64 from 71 the prior quarter. The figure was at the lowest level since the second quarter of 2003.
During the last ten years there has been a 69% correlation between the Composite Index Level and quarterly growth in US factory sector output.
The current orders index fell to 77 from 81 in 2Q and that was the lowest since late 2003. The 3Q export orders index, however, improved moderately to 75. During the last ten years there has been a 59% correlation between the export orders index and quarterly growth in real US exports.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061106b.jpg" width="353">
The profit margins index improved slightly to 75 from 74 in 2Q and so far in 2006 the quarters have averaged 77 versus an average 65 last year.Capital spending intentions for the coming year fell sharply 56 from the record high 86 in 2Q. During the last ten years there has been a 75% correlation between the capital spending index a q/q growth in business investment.
The survey of 60 senior financial executives representing a broad range of manufacturing industries reflects the views on current &amp; future business conditions. The business outlook index is a weighted sum of shipments, backlogs, inventories, and profit margin indexes.
For the latest US Business Outlook from the MAPI click <a href="http://www.mapi.net/html/prelease.cfm?release_id=2316">here</a>.
Confessions of a Data Dependent are Dallas Federal Reserve Bank President Richard W. Fisher Remarks before the New York Association for Business Economics and they are available <a href="http://dallasfed.org/news/speeches/fisher/2006/fs061102.cfm"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/surveys/@SE/@SE.HTM">Manufacturers&#39; Alliance/MAPI Survey</a></th>
<th scope="col">3Q &#39;06</th>
<th scope="col">2Q &#39;06</th>
<th scope="col">3Q &#39;05</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Composite Business Index</td>
<td>64</td>
<td>71</td>
<td>66</td>
<td>70</td>
<td>76</td>
<td>67</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
 Sales and New Orders and NTC's PMI Suggest Manufacturing in Germany Is Decelerating   
by <a href="/comment/Curley.html">Louise Curley</a> November 6, 2006


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061106c.jpg" width="353">
September manufacturing sales and new orders for Germany were released today. Sales increased 0.17% from August but were almost 6% above September, 2005. New orders, however, fell 2.5% in September, although they were 9.6% above a year ago. The decline in new orders was attributable to foreign orders which declined 6.2% in the month. Domestic order actually increased 1.5%. Both sales and new orders--domestic and foreign--are well above year ago levels.
New orders tend to be erratic, as a result, a change in one month&#39;s orders may not be indicative. If we take a three month moving average of the data, a smoother picture emerges. The first chart compares the actual new orders with the three month moving average. The three month moving average in September shows a 1.1% gain over the August value. In the second chart, which shows domestic and foreign new orders on a three month moving average basis, foreign new orders are virtually unchanged in September and domestic orders are somewhat better.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061106d.jpg" width="353">
The NTC Economics Ltd&#39;s Purchasing Managers&#39; Survey for manufacturing in German is suggesting some cooling. The diffusion indexes continue well above the 50 mark, that is indicative of increased activity, but in several indices, the October values are below the September values. The overall index for manufacturing is 58.32 for October, compared to 58.54 in September. Comparable data for the new orders index are 59.84 and 60.09; for export new orders, 56.26 and 57.09 respectively.
Deceleration in growth is not unusual after the good expansion Germany manufacturing has experienced since the beginning of 2005.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/GERMANY/@D6/@D64/@D64.HTM">Germany</a></th>
<th scope="col">Sep 06</th>
<th scope="col">Aug 06</th>
<th scope="col">Sep 05</th>
<th scope="col">M/M %</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y %</th>
<th scope="col">2005 %</th>
<th scope="col">2004 %</th>
<th scope="col">2003&nbsp; %</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Manufacturing&nbsp; (2000=100)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Sales&nbsp;</td>
<td>115.1</td>
<td>114.9</td>
<td>108.6</td>
<td>0.17</td>
<td>5.99</td>
<td>3.27</td>
<td>3.92</td>
<td>-0.48</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; New Orders&nbsp;</td>
<td>121.5</td>
<td>124.6</td>
<td>110.5</td>
<td>-2.43</td>
<td>9.56</td>
<td>5.27</td>
<td>5.56</td>
<td>0.59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Domestic</td>
<td>110.3</td>
<td>108.7</td>
<td>99.5</td>
<td>1.47</td>
<td>10.85</td>
<td>2.01</td>
<td>3.11</td>
<td>-0.12</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Foreign</td>
<td>135.6</td>
<td>144.4</td>
<td>125.2</td>
<td>-6.23</td>
<td>8.15</td>
<td>8.80</td>
<td>8.29</td>
<td>1.94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">3 Month&nbsp; Moving Averages</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Total New Orders</td>
<td>122.1</td>
<td>120.8</td>
<td>110.1</td>
<td>1.08</td>
<td>10.90</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>--</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Domestic</td>
<td>108.1</td>
<td>106.0</td>
<td>100.9</td>
<td>1.98</td>
<td>7.14</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>--</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Foreign</td>
<td>139.5</td>
<td>139.3</td>
<td>123.9</td>
<td>0.14</td>
<td>12.59</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>--</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

The 3Q '06 Composite Business Index published by the Manufacturers' Alliance/MAPI fell for the second quarter to 64 from 71 the prior quarter. The figure was at the lowest level since the second quarter of 2003. During the last ten [...]

MAPI Business Outlook Survey Off FurtherĀĀ

Carol Stone, CBE

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061103f.jpg" width="353">
Canadian labor markets seem to be staging a comeback after something of a sinking spell during the summer. In October data reported this morning by StatCan, employment gained by 50,500 and the unemployment rate fell to 6.2%, the lowest since 6.1% in May and June.
Back in September we were puzzled about whether recent months&#39; job losses were a sign of sagging activity, or merely a correction after an outsized rise in May. After two months of increases, we probably can conclude that the latter is the more valid conclusion. In October, at 16,555,500, employment in Canada reached a new high.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061103g.jpg" width="353">
Further, the downtrend we thought we were seeing in the goods-producing sector may also be &quot;just a phase&quot;. September and October had gains of 18,000 and 9,000, respectively, in construction, mining and utilities. We&#39;d attribute these increases to added supply efforts in Canada&#39;s energy production. It is still the case that manufacturing jobs are declining.
Service industries have mixed performances. Some, like finance, business support services and accommodation and food services, are growing vigorously. But others, including professional and technical activities and information services, are waffling after extended uptrends. The service sector as a whole is gaining, but the sources of growth seem to be different most every month.<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061103h.jpg" width="353">
The unemployment rate fell 0.2 point in October. Not all of that move represents good news, though. Along with the employment growth, the number of people in the labor force flattened out. The so-called participation rate, the labor force as a portion of the population over age 15, has edged lower, reaching 67.08%, the lowest since February&#39;s 67.02%; this rate peaked at 67.34% in July. These may look like small differences, but in Canada, each 0.1% in the participation rate represents about 26,000 people who are seeking work or deciding not to seek work. All these caveats aside, the decline in the unemployment rate obviously contains more good news than bad, and we are encouraged by the October labor data, which indeed seem to confirm that the declines in the summer were perhaps a &quot;vacation&quot; and labor markets have picked up once again.
These national Canadian data are contained in Haver&#39;s CANSIM database. Some detail is also available for the Provinces; those data are in CANSIMR.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/CANSIM/@C6/@C6.HTM">Canada&nbsp;</a> (Seasonally Adjusted)</th>
<th scope="col">Oct 2006</th>
<th scope="col">Sept 2006</th>
<th scope="col">Aug 2006</th>
<th scope="col">Year Ago</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Employment (000s)</td>
<td>16,555</td>
<td>16,505</td>
<td>16,488</td>
<td>16,268</td>
<td>16,169</td>
<td>15,949</td>
<td>15,672</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Change, 000s/%</td>
<td>+50</td>
<td>+16</td>
<td>-16</td>
<td>1.8%</td>
<td>1.4%</td>
<td>1.8%</td>
<td>2.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Goods-Producing </td>
<td>+9</td>
<td>+18</td>
<td>-18</td>
<td>-0.4%</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
<td>1.7%</td>
<td>1.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Service-Producing</td>
<td>+2</td>
<td>+2</td>
<td>+30</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
<td>1.8%</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Unemployment (000s)</td>
<td>1,086</td>
<td>1,131</td>
<td>1,141</td>
<td>1,155</td>
<td>1,173</td>
<td>1,235</td>
<td>1,286</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Unemployment Rate (%)</td>
<td>6.2</td>
<td>6.4</td>
<td>6.5</td>
<td>6.6</td>
<td>6.8</td>
<td>7.2</td>
<td>7.6</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Participation Rate (%)</td>
<td>67.08</td>
<td>67.14</td>
<td>67.21</td>
<td>67.20</td>
<td>67.20</td>
<td>67.54</td>
<td>67.54</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Canadian labor markets seem to be staging a comeback after something of a sinking spell during the summer. In October data reported this morning by StatCan, employment gained by 50,500 and the unemployment rate fell to 6.2%, the [...]

Rebound in Canadian Labor Market after Summer Pause

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>

 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061103d.jpg" width="353">
The Business Activity Index for the non-manufacturing sector in October recovered all of the prior month&#39;s decline and rose to 57.1. The figure from the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) exceeded Consensus expectations for a lesser rise to 54.5.
Since the series&#39; inception in 1997 there has been a 50% correlation between the level of the Business Activity Index and the q/q change in real GDP for services plus construction.
The new orders sub-index slipped to 56.5 after a sharp September increase though the employment index gave back all of its September gain. At 51.0 it was at the lowest monthly level since 2004 and just 14% of survey respondents reported higher employment. Since the series&#39; inception in 1997 there has been a 60% correlation between the level of the ISM non-manufacturing employment index and the m/m change in payroll employment in the service producing plus the construction industries.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061103e.jpg" width="353">
Pricing power dropped to its worst since 2003. Since inception eight years ago, there has been a 70% correlation between the price index and the y/y change in the GDP services chain price index.
ISM surveys more than 370 purchasing managers in more than 62 industries including construction, law firms, hospitals, government and retailers. The non-manufacturing survey dates back to July 1997.
Business Activity Index for the non-manufacturing sector reflects a question separate from the subgroups mentioned above. In contrast, the NAPM manufacturing sector composite index is a weighted average five components.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@EF/@EF03/@EF03.HTM">ISM Nonmanufacturing Survey</a></th>
<th scope="col">October</th>
<th scope="col">September</th>
<th scope="col">Oct. &#39;05</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Business Activity Index</td>
<td>57.1</td>
<td>52.9</td>
<td>59.2</td>
<td>60.1</td>
<td>62.5</td>
<td>58.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Prices Index</td>
<td>51.9</td>
<td>56.7</td>
<td>74.1</td>
<td>67.9</td>
<td>68.8</td>
<td>56.6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>


</html>

The Business Activity Index for the non-manufacturing sector in October recovered all of the prior month's decline and rose to 57.1. The figure from the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) exceeded Consensus expectations for a [...]

ISM Nonmanufacturing Index Recovered

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061103a.jpg" width="353">
Nonfarm payrolls last month rose 92,000 and for the second month fell short of Consensus expectations which were for a 125,000 rise. However, again for the second month, upward revisions to prior months&#39; increases left the impression of firmness in the labor market
For September, payrolls are now estimated to have risen 148,000, nearly triple the initial estimate. In addition, the August increase is now pegged at 230,000, up from 188,000 estimated last month. The gains pulled the three month average increase in jobs to 157,000 and the ten month average to 147,000, just below last year&#39;s average monthly gain of 165,000 and an average 175,000 during 2004.
Further evidence of a firm labor market was provided by the unemployment rate which declined to a five year low of 4.4%. The drop reflected an employment gain of 437,000 and not a typo. It was the largest monthly increase since early 2005 (1.9% y/y) and followed a 271,000 September gain. The labor force increased 199,000 (1.3% y/y) and the labor force participation rate held for the fifth month at 66.2%, up from the monthly lows during 2005 of 65.8%.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061103b.jpg" width="353">
Government payrolls increased 34,000 (1.1% y/y). As a result private payrolls rose 58,000 (1.6% y/y) following upwardly revised gains of 120,000 and 180,000 in September and August, respectively.
The breadth of one month gain in private payrolls slipped a bit to 54.9% in October from an upwardly revised 55.9% in September but the three month diffusion index fell to 55.6%, the lowest level since early 2005. In the factory sector the one month breadth of gain fell further below break even to 40.5% from 43.5% in August. The three month diffusion index fell to 36.9%, also it&#39;s lowest in nearly a year.
Private service-producing jobs rose 118,000 (1.7% y/y) and a 126,000 September increase was double the initial estimate. Professional &amp; business services employment rose 43,000 (2.8% y/y) while temporary help services jobs recovered 15,000 (1.1% y/y). Jobs in education &amp; health rose 28,000 (2.5% y/y) while leisure &amp; hospitality jobs increased 35,000 (2.5% y/y).<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061103c.jpg" width="353">
Factory sector payrolls fell a hard 39,000, the seventh m/m decline this year and the largest since 2003. Jobs in motor vehicle &amp; parts industries fell 14,700 (-2.9% y/y) while jobs in furniture fell 3,300 (-3.5% y/y) and fabricated metals declined 3,700 (+2.0% y/y). Jobs in wood products also fell a sharp 5,000 (-2.4% y/y) and nondurables dropped 20,000 (-1.0% y/y) with textile industries down quite hard.
Construction employment fell 26,000 (+2.0% y/y) after a little revised 5,000 worker gain during September.
Average hourly earnings doubled the previous month&#39;s increase and rose 0.4%. Factory sector earnings rose 0.4% (1.3% y/y), the largest gain in a year.
The workweek rose to 33.9 hours, back to the highest level since 2002.
Are Two Employment Surveys Better than One? from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis is available <a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/net/20061101/cover.pdf"> here</a>
Money and Monetary Policy for the Twenty-First Century, also from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis can be found <a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/review/06/11/Jordan.pdf"> here</a>

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@EB/@EB01/@EB01.HTM">Employment</a></th>
<th scope="col">October</th>
<th scope="col">September</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Payroll Employment</td>
<td>92,000</td>
<td>148,000</td>
<td>1.5%</td>
<td>1.5%</td>
<td>1.1%</td>
<td>-0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Manufacturing</td>
<td>-39,000</td>
<td>-12,000</td>
<td>-0.1%</td>
<td>-0.6%</td>
<td>-1.3%</td>
<td>-4.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Average Weekly Hours</td>
<td>33.9</td>
<td>33.8</td>
<td>33.8 (Oct. &#39;05)</td>
<td>33.8</td>
<td>33.7</td>
<td>33.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Average Hourly Earnings</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Unemployment Rate</td>
<td>4.4%</td>
<td>4.6%</td>
<td>5.1% (Sept. &#39;05)</td>
<td>5.1%</td>
<td>5.5%</td>
<td>6.0%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Nonfarm payrolls last month rose 92,000 and for the second month fell short of Consensus expectations which were for a 125,000 rise. However, again for the second month, upward revisions to prior months' increases left the impression [...]

U.S. Payroll Report: More Upward Revisions

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>

 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061103a.jpg" width="353">
Nonfarm payrolls last month rose 92,000 and for the second month fell short of Consensus expectations which were for a 125,000 rise. However, again for the second month, upward revisions to prior months&#39; increases left the impression of firmness in the labor market
For September, payrolls are now estimated to have risen 148,000, nearly triple the initial estimate. In addition, the August increase is now pegged at 230,000, up from 188,000 estimated last month. The gains pulled the three month average increase in jobs to 157,000 and the ten month average to 147,000, just below last year&#39;s average monthly gain of 165,000 and an average 175,000 during 2004.
Further evidence of a firm labor market was provided by the unemployment rate which declined to a five year low of 4.4%. The drop reflected an employment gain of 437,000 and not a typo. It was the largest monthly increase since early 2005 (1.9% y/y) and followed a 271,000 September gain. The labor force increased 199,000 (1.3% y/y) and the labor force participation rate held for the fifth month at 66.2%, up from the monthly lows during 2005 of 65.8%.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061103b.jpg" width="353">
Government payrolls increased 34,000 (1.1% y/y). As a result private payrolls rose 58,000 (1.6% y/y) following upwardly revised gains of 120,000 and 180,000 in September and August, respectively.
The breadth of one month gain in private payrolls slipped a bit to 54.9% in October from an upwardly revised 55.9% in September but the three month diffusion index fell to 55.6%, the lowest level since early 2005. In the factory sector the one month breadth of gain fell further below break even to 40.5% from 43.5% in August. The three month diffusion index fell to 36.9%, also it&#39;s lowest in nearly a year.
Private service-producing jobs rose 118,000 (1.7% y/y) and a 126,000 September increase was double the initial estimate. Professional &amp; business services employment rose 43,000 (2.8% y/y) while temporary help services jobs recovered 15,000 (1.1% y/y). Jobs in education &amp; health rose 28,000 (2.5% y/y) while leisure &amp; hospitality jobs increased 35,000 (2.5% y/y).<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061103c.jpg" width="353">
Factory sector payrolls fell a hard 39,000, the seventh m/m decline this year and the largest since 2003. Jobs in motor vehicle &amp; parts industries fell 14,700 (-2.9% y/y) while jobs in furniture fell 3,300 (-3.5% y/y) and fabricated metals declined 3,700 (+2.0% y/y). Jobs in wood products also fell a sharp 5,000 (-2.4% y/y) and nondurables dropped 20,000 (-1.0% y/y) with textile industries down quite hard.
Construction employment fell 26,000 (+2.0% y/y) after a little revised 5,000 worker gain during September.
Average hourly earnings doubled the previous month&#39;s increase and rose 0.4%. Factory sector earnings rose 0.4% (1.3% y/y), the largest gain in a year.
The workweek rose to 33.9 hours, back to the highest level since 2002.
Are Two Employment Surveys Better than One? from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis is available <a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/net/20061101/cover.pdf"> here</a>
Money and Monetary Policy for the Twenty-First Century, also from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis can be found <a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/review/06/11/Jordan.pdf"> here</a>

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@EB/@EB01/@EB01.HTM">Employment</a></th>
<th scope="col">October</th>
<th scope="col">September</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Payroll Employment</td>
<td>92,000</td>
<td>148,000</td>
<td>1.5%</td>
<td>1.5%</td>
<td>1.1%</td>
<td>-0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Manufacturing</td>
<td>-39,000</td>
<td>-12,000</td>
<td>-0.1%</td>
<td>-0.6%</td>
<td>-1.3%</td>
<td>-4.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Average Weekly Hours</td>
<td>33.9</td>
<td>33.8</td>
<td>33.8 (Oct. &#39;05)</td>
<td>33.8</td>
<td>33.7</td>
<td>33.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Average Hourly Earnings</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Unemployment Rate</td>
<td>4.4%</td>
<td>4.6%</td>
<td>5.1% (Sept. &#39;05)</td>
<td>5.1%</td>
<td>5.5%</td>
<td>6.0%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
ISM Nonmanufacturing Index Recovered 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom Moeller</a> November 3, 2006


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061103d.jpg" width="353">
The Business Activity Index for the non-manufacturing sector in October recovered all of the prior month&#39;s decline and rose to 57.1. The figure from the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) exceeded Consensus expectations for a lesser rise to 54.5.
Since the series&#39; inception in 1997 there has been a 50% correlation between the level of the Business Activity Index and the q/q change in real GDP for services plus construction.
The new orders sub-index slipped to 56.5 after a sharp September increase though the employment index gave back all of its September gain. At 51.0 it was at the lowest monthly level since 2004 and just 14% of survey respondents reported higher employment. Since the series&#39; inception in 1997 there has been a 60% correlation between the level of the ISM non-manufacturing employment index and the m/m change in payroll employment in the service producing plus the construction industries.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061103e.jpg" width="353">
Pricing power dropped to its worst since 2003. Since inception eight years ago, there has been a 70% correlation between the price index and the y/y change in the GDP services chain price index.
ISM surveys more than 370 purchasing managers in more than 62 industries including construction, law firms, hospitals, government and retailers. The non-manufacturing survey dates back to July 1997.
Business Activity Index for the non-manufacturing sector reflects a question separate from the subgroups mentioned above. In contrast, the NAPM manufacturing sector composite index is a weighted average five components.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@EF/@EF03/@EF03.HTM">ISM Nonmanufacturing Survey</a></th>
<th scope="col">October</th>
<th scope="col">September</th>
<th scope="col">Oct. &#39;05</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Business Activity Index</td>
<td>57.1</td>
<td>52.9</td>
<td>59.2</td>
<td>60.1</td>
<td>62.5</td>
<td>58.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Prices Index</td>
<td>51.9</td>
<td>56.7</td>
<td>74.1</td>
<td>67.9</td>
<td>68.8</td>
<td>56.6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Rebound in Canadian Labor Market after Summer Pause 
by <a href="/comment/Stone.html">Carol Stone</a> November 3, 2006


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061103f.jpg" width="353">
Canadian labor markets seem to be staging a comeback after something of a sinking spell during the summer. In October data reported this morning by StatCan, employment gained by 50,500 and the unemployment rate fell to 6.2%, the lowest since 6.1% in May and June.
Back in September we were puzzled about whether recent months&#39; job losses were a sign of sagging activity, or merely a correction after an outsized rise in May. After two months of increases, we probably can conclude that the latter is the more valid conclusion. In October, at 16,555,500, employment in Canada reached a new high.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061103g.jpg" width="353">
Further, the downtrend we thought we were seeing in the goods-producing sector may also be &quot;just a phase&quot;. September and October had gains of 18,000 and 9,000, respectively, in construction, mining and utilities. We&#39;d attribute these increases to added supply efforts in Canada&#39;s energy production. It is still the case that manufacturing jobs are declining.
Service industries have mixed performances. Some, like finance, business support services and accommodation and food services, are growing vigorously. But others, including professional and technical activities and information services, are waffling after extended uptrends. The service sector as a whole is gaining, but the sources of growth seem to be different most every month.<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061103h.jpg" width="353">
The unemployment rate fell 0.2 point in October. Not all of that move represents good news, though. Along with the employment growth, the number of people in the labor force flattened out. The so-called participation rate, the labor force as a portion of the population over age 15, has edged lower, reaching 67.08%, the lowest since February&#39;s 67.02%; this rate peaked at 67.34% in July. These may look like small differences, but in Canada, each 0.1% in the participation rate represents about 26,000 people who are seeking work or deciding not to seek work. All these caveats aside, the decline in the unemployment rate obviously contains more good news than bad, and we are encouraged by the October labor data, which indeed seem to confirm that the declines in the summer were perhaps a &quot;vacation&quot; and labor markets have picked up once again.
These national Canadian data are contained in Haver&#39;s CANSIM database. Some detail is also available for the Provinces; those data are in CANSIMR.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/CANSIM/@C6/@C6.HTM">Canada&nbsp;</a> (Seasonally Adjusted)</th>
<th scope="col">Oct 2006</th>
<th scope="col">Sept 2006</th>
<th scope="col">Aug 2006</th>
<th scope="col">Year Ago</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Employment (000s)</td>
<td>16,555</td>
<td>16,505</td>
<td>16,488</td>
<td>16,268</td>
<td>16,169</td>
<td>15,949</td>
<td>15,672</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Change, 000s/%</td>
<td>+50</td>
<td>+16</td>
<td>-16</td>
<td>1.8%</td>
<td>1.4%</td>
<td>1.8%</td>
<td>2.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Goods-Producing </td>
<td>+9</td>
<td>+18</td>
<td>-18</td>
<td>-0.4%</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
<td>1.7%</td>
<td>1.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Service-Producing</td>
<td>+2</td>
<td>+2</td>
<td>+30</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
<td>1.8%</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Unemployment (000s)</td>
<td>1,086</td>
<td>1,131</td>
<td>1,141</td>
<td>1,155</td>
<td>1,173</td>
<td>1,235</td>
<td>1,286</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Unemployment Rate (%)</td>
<td>6.2</td>
<td>6.4</td>
<td>6.5</td>
<td>6.6</td>
<td>6.8</td>
<td>7.2</td>
<td>7.6</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Participation Rate (%)</td>
<td>67.08</td>
<td>67.14</td>
<td>67.21</td>
<td>67.20</td>
<td>67.20</td>
<td>67.54</td>
<td>67.54</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>


</html>

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061102j.jpg" width="353">
German labor market data for September and October were reported today. We last checked in with these data at the end of June. The most notable factor then was an increase in job vacancies, and we wondered if they would translate into actual jobs. This may have happened -- at least to some extent.
Total employment in September was 39.17 million, up 24,000 from August and 334,000 or 0.9% from September 2005. It has risen for seven consecutive months (seasonally adjusted), and marks the longest such span since 1999/2000.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061102k.jpg" width="353">
Moreover, the number of job vacancies has continued to rise. In October employers reported opportunities for 662,000 workers, and increase of 45,000 from September and 179,000 from a year ago. This increase in vacancies, when filled, would add about 0.5% to total employment.<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061102l.jpg" width="353">
The unemployment situation is mixed and depends on what measure one looks at. The harmonized &quot;ILO&quot; unemployment rate was 8.3% in September, steady with August, but up from a recent low of 7.9% in April. Germans prefer their own measure of &quot;registered&quot; unemployment rate, and it has declined, dipping to 10.4% in October, the lowest since April 2004. Among labor force groups, all sectors of the population have seen some year-on-year improvement in recent months (the individual categories are not seasonally adjusted, necessitating comparisons with like periods of prior years) and the rate for men in particular has reached down to 9.1%, the lowest since October 2001. Thus, job opportunities are increasing in Germany, and with a record number of vacancies shown in this report, that may yield more workers in the months ahead.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/GERMANY/@D5/@D5.HTM">Germany: Seas Adj, ex as noted</a></th>
<th scope="col">Oct 2006</th>
<th scope="col">Sept 2006</th>
<th scope="col">Aug 2006</th>
<th scope="col">Year Ago</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">LFS Employment (mil)</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>39.17</td>
<td>39.14</td>
<td>38.84</td>
<td>38.82</td>
<td>38.87</td>
<td>38.72</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Change (thous)</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>+24</td>
<td>+34</td>
<td>+334</td>
<td>-53</td>
<td>+150</td>
<td>-370</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Yr/Yr % Chg NSA</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>+0.9</td>
<td>-0.1</td>
<td>+0.4</td>
<td>-0.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Unemployment Rate (%, ILO Def.)</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>8.3</td>
<td>8.3</td>
<td>8.0</td>
<td>7.1</td>
<td>9.1</td>
<td>9.2</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Registered Unemployment Rate (%)</td>
<td>10.4</td>
<td>10.6</td>
<td>10.6</td>
<td>11.6</td>
<td>11.7</td>
<td>10.6</td>
<td>10.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Job Vacancies (thous)</td>
<td>662</td>
<td>617</td>
<td>589</td>
<td>483</td>
<td>488</td>
<td>278</td>
<td>318</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

German labor market data for September and October were reported today. We last checked in with these data at the end of June. The most notable factor then was an increase in job vacancies, and we wondered if they would translate into [...]

German Labor Markets Show More Distinct Gain

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061102m.jpg" width="353">
Announced job cuts reported by Challenger, Grey &amp; Christmas for October retraced most of the prior month&#39;s jump with a 31,138 decline to 69,177. The three month moving average of layoff announcements nevertheless rose to 78,257, its highest level since March.
During the last ten years there has been an 83% (inverse) correlation between the three month moving average level of announced job cuts and the three month change payroll employment.
Layoffs fell sharply m/m in the automotive (210.3% y/y), commodities (77.2% aerospace (-70.7% y/y), consumer goods (-23.9% y/y), industrial goods (-32.6% y/y), and pharmaceutical (-74.1% y/y) industries.
Job cut announcements differ from layoffs. Many are achieved through attrition, early retirement or just never occur.
Challenger also reported that announced hiring plans fell sharply m/m (-54.3% y/y).

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/SURVEYS/@S3/@S301/@S301.HTM">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a></th>
<th scope="col">October</th>
<th scope="col">September</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Announced Job Cuts</td>
<td>69,177</td>
<td>100,315</td>
<td>-14.9%</td>
<td>1,072,054</td>
<td>1,039,935</td>
<td>1,236,426</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Announced job cuts reported by Challenger, Grey & Christmas for October retraced most of the prior month's jump with a 31,138 decline to 69,177. The three month moving average of layoff announcements nevertheless rose to 78,257, its [...]

Challenger Layoffs Back Down

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061102h.jpg" width="353">
Factory inventories rose 0.6% last month. That matched the gain during July, which was upwardly revised, and it pulled the y/y change up to 7.4%, the fastest since early 2005.
Though petroleum inventories have fallen in recent months, higher prices have lifted the y/y gain to 15.7%. Despite this distortion, factory inventories less petroleum grew 7.0% y/y in September, the fastest since 2005.
Primary metals inventories rose another, firm 2.8% (16.3% y/y). Inventories of computers &amp; electronic products actually fell slightly (9.3% y/y) after a strong 1.5% August increase and inventories of electrical equipment fell 0.3% (+11.6% y/y) after near 2% jumps during each of the prior three months. Machinery inventories spiked 1.4% (6.1% y/y).<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/061102i.jpg" width="353">
Total factory orders recovered a strong 2.1% after an August dip. That strength reflected an 8.3% pop in durable goods orders which was little revised from the advance report and reflected higher aircraft orders. Factory orders less transportation fell 2.4% (+3.0% y/y), the weakness reflecting a 4.6% decline in nondurables and a 14.8% drop in petroleum.
Factory shipments fell 3.5% due to the drop in petroleum. Transportation shipments also collapsed 4.5% due to a 7.3% drop in autos. Still, factory shipments less transportation &amp; petroleum fell 2.0% (+5.0% y/y) due to across the board declines.
Unfilled orders surged 3.9% due to the jump in civilian aircraft. Less the transportation sector altogether backlogs rose 1.2% (13.1% y/y).<a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/review/05/07/Gali.pdf"> </a>

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@ED/@ED01/@ED0101/@ED01016/@ED01016.HTM">Factory Survey</a> (NAICS)</th>
<th scope="col">September</th>
<th scope="col">August</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Inventories</td>
<td>0.6%</td>
<td>0.6%</td>
<td>7.4%</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>6.9%</td>
<td>-7.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">New Orders</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
<td>-0.3%</td>
<td>7.7%</td>
<td>8.5%</td>
<td>7.5%</td>
<td>0.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Shipments</td>
<td>-3.5%</td>
<td>0.8%</td>
<td>2.4%</td>
<td>7.1%</td>
<td>6.8%</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Unfilled Orders</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
<td>0.5%</td>
<td>22.0%</td>
<td>16.3%</td>
<td>4.5%</td>
<td>-1.0%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Factory inventories rose 0.6% last month. That matched the gain during July, which was upwardly revised, and it pulled the y/y change up to 7.4%, the fastest since early 2005. Though petroleum inventories have fallen in recent months, [...]

U.S. Factory Inventory Accumulation Continued

Surging orders for computers and electronics propelling durable goods orders

Next year's inflation forecasts are on the rise and above target

Disrupted global supply chains placing upward pressure on US goods prices

Construction of data centers has overtaken transportation construction in US

Elevated energy prices putting intense upward pressure on input prices around the globe

US is big leader in global surge in private AI investment

Larger-than-usual income tax refunds this year are supporting consumer spending

Sharply rising share of AI-related jobs

Inflationary impact of surge in oil prices larger in Europe than in the US

Futures market thinks the price of oil will recede significantly over the next six months

Recent pickup in US defense orders could help support overall growth ahead

Cost of transporting crude oil has soared to series high

Market-based inflation expectations have not yet reflected recent surge in oil prices

Global equity markets are fearing a major economic disruption from soaring oil prices

Is recent drop in sentiment signaling softer growth ahead?

With the Iran conflict, geopolitical risk has soared to alarming levels

Soaring AI-related investment in US underpinning strong contribution of business spending to overall growth

AI-related outperformance of IP in Advanced Asia ex Japan

Resilient US economy pushing up Blue Chip 2026 outlook

US and China big leaders in adoption of AI models

Robust US demand for advanced technology products

China's export growth rotating away from the US

More pronounced upward revisions in countries more exposed to AI investment

Stable job openings and hiring rates point to cautious hiring

Global freight costs are on the rise while supply chain pressures are contained

Our global data offering is unparalleled in terms of coverage, quality, and organization. We offer 290+ databases from 2500 government and private sources, a wealth of key survey and forecast data covering the world’s economies, and a robust offering of archive databases that drive machine learning for big data applications.

Optimized for precision analytics, our data is seamlessly integrated with Microsoft Office and all leading statistical packages through our DLX® software and platform independent HaverView™ website. We further offer direct database feeds, client server or cloud-based delivery, and RESTful API.


Privacy Policy

Disclaimer

Contact us

Service Health

A premier time series data platform for the global strategy, research, and quant communities. 

New York

London

Singapore

Tokyo

Economy in Brief

Viewpoints

Contact Us

Our Data

Our Products

What We Do

Our Authors

About Us

Data News

Featured Data Additions

Resources

Release Calendars

Training Center

Webinars

Newsletters

Download Software

For Clients

Live Updates

Winnie Tapasanun

260625H9.jpg

260625I9.jpg

The U.S. international trade deficit in goods ballooned to a larger-than-expected $105.75 billion in May after narrowing to $83.01 billion in April, according to the advance estimate from the U.S. Census Bureau. The May reading marked the third widening in the goods trade deficit in four months, exceeding a $91.55 billion shortfall in May 2025. A deficit of $84.0 billion for May had been expected by the Action Economics Forecast Survey. The deficit reached a low of $61.44 billion in October 2025 (the smallest since February 2020) and a record high of $158.73 billion in March 2025. On a quarterly basis, the deficit averaged $94.38 billion so far in Q2'26 versus $81.96 billion in Q1'26.

Total goods exports fell 5.4% m/m (+14.7% y/y) to $207.67 billion in May, the first monthly fall since December and a three-month low, following a 3.8% rise to a record-high $219.52 billion in April. Exports were up 27.7% from a June 2023 low. The m/m fall in exports in May reflected declines of 9.2% (-5.0% y/y) in nonfood consumer goods excluding autos, 7.0% (+23.2% y/y) in industrial supplies & materials, 6.8% (+19.5% y/y) in other goods, and 5.0% (+14.8% y/y) in capital goods excluding autos. To the upside, exports of foods, feeds & beverages (+3.9%; +19.1% y/y) and automotive vehicles & parts (+0.5%; -3.6% y/y) rebounded m/m in May.

Total goods imports, up for the fourth consecutive month, rose 3.6% m/m (15.0% y/y) to $313.43 billion in May, after a 2.0% increase to $302.53 billion in April, marking the highest level since the March 2025 record high of $340.11 billion. Imports were up 25.0% from a March 2023 low. The m/m rise in imports in May was broad-based across all end-use categories, led by an 11.5% gain (22.0% y/y) in other goods, followed by increases of 6.3% (1.4% y/y) in automotive vehicles & parts, 5.7% (-9.1% y/y) in nonfood consumer goods excluding autos, 4.8% (11.7% y/y) in industrial supplies & materials, 4.3% (-0.2% y/y) in foods, feeds & beverages, and 0.4% (41.9% y/y) in capital goods excluding autos. 

The advance international trade data can be found in Haver's **USECON** database. The expectation figure is from the Action Economics Forecast Survey, which is in **AS1REPNA**.

- Deficit: $105.75 bil. in May, up $22.75 bil. (+27.4%) from April’s $83.01 bil.
- Exports -5.4%, first m/m decline since Dec., led by a 9.2% drop in nonauto consumer goods exports.
- Imports +3.6%, fourth straight m/m rise to highest level since Mar. ’25, driven by an 11.5% gain in imports of other goods.

U.S. Goods Trade Deficit Balloons in May, Largest Since March ’25

Robert Brusca

260626E.jpg

In June, there's a slight divergence in the performance of industry climate and service sector climate, although broadly the two sectors have seen their composite indexes moving in more or less the same direction. Since 2024, the industry survey has moved up slightly after falling faster than the services gauge. The services survey has been locked in a slow trend of deterioration, largely since it reached a peak in 2021 in the wake of COVID.

The industry climate gauge has a 30.8 percentile standing, but the recent production trend, while declining, logs a more substantial 42.8 percentile standing. Contributing survey members find their own industry ‘likely trend’ much weaker, at a 21.2 percentile standing. Demand overall, however, has standings above the 50th percentile, putting overall and foreign orders & demand each above their respective medians for this period of ranking back to 2001. Inventories have a strong 81-percentile ranking. Prices are extremely strong, with 87-percentile and 86-percentile standings for respondents for their personal industry trend for prices as well as for the overarching manufacturing sector estimate of prices. Higher prices seem to be the one thing that everyone can agree on by a large margin.

260626.jpg

As for services, the service climate index improved slightly to 93.4 in June from 92.6 in May. The three-month moving average was weaker in June than in May as well; the 12-month moving average has been stuck at its current level for a number of months. The outlook in June improved slightly to a reading of -12 from -15 in May, but the outlook ranking is still a weak 26.8 percentile standing. The three-month expectations and observations of past sales trends haven't changed much in the last two months, but there has been a slight improvement for sales expectations. However, both sales metrics have low 20th percentile standings. Sales prices have deteriorated slightly in June compared to May for both the observed and the expected trends, but prices have standings above their 50th percentiles, logging above-median performance. Employment over the last three months has weakened noticeably, and expected employment is weaker by a small amount.

In terms of rankings, all of the sector rankings are below the 50th percentile on all of these observations, including the climate headline except for sales prices where both the past three-month observed trend and the expected trend have readings above their respective 50th percentiles, indicating past and expected price pressures in excess of normal.

260626 2.jpg

**Assessment**
On balance, the readings for the French industry, manufacturing sector and services are not encouraging. In addition, concerns about prices linger. The services sector, those concerns seem moderate compared to the concerns in manufacturing.

The hot war continues between Ukraine and Russia, while in the Middle East there was talk of some improvement and a potential peace deal between the United States and Iran, but every time there is some talk of a breakthrough, there appears to be a breakdown. In the most recent development, Iran has asserted its right to control traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, and it's not clear how that demand would ever be consistent with the U.S. allowing a ceasefire. It appears that Iran may have traded its irreconcilable demand for nuclear weapons for a more pragmatic and real-world argument—that it will control the traffic through the Strait of Hormuz simply because it can—and it still is doing exactly that, even after all the destruction it suffered.

Stopping Iran from controlling the Strait would take a commitment to restart the war. All this makes me personally more pessimistic. I think Iran sees the need for Trump to cut a deal and stop the war before the U.S. mid-term elections, and it is pressing that need to its advantage. Trading its nuclear ambitions for real world control of the Strait would elevate Iran’s power from being dangerous but ethereal to a real world event with constant consequences.

France

French Industry and Services Confidence Diverge in June

Andrew Cates

**Equity Momentum and Global Surprises — Still Moving Together**
One of the more telling features of global equity markets in 2026 has been the persistence of the correlation between non-US equity momentum and global growth and inflation surprise indices. Equity markets outside the United States have generally prospered when economic data have beaten consensus expectations and when inflation surprises have been negative  — a combination that has historically been associated with stronger corporate earnings and a more benign policy backdrop in economies other than the US. That correlation has held reasonably well through the turbulence of the past few months, even as the Middle East conflict introduced significant noise into both the economic data and the financial market signal. What the chart reveals this week is a picture of moderate but not alarming deterioration: global growth surprises have softened at the margin, consistent with the energy cost headwinds that have weighed on European and Asian activity, but the relationship between equity momentum and the broader data pulse remains intact. It is a signal that market participants continue to track economic fundamentals rather than purely geopolitical newsflow — a modestly reassuring sign that the underlying framework for assessing the global cycle has not broken down.

260625Z1.jpg

**The Fed Decouples: Why Oil and US Two-Year Yields Have Parted Ways**
For much of 2026, oil prices and US two-year Treasury yields moved in close alignment. The logic was straightforward: higher oil prices raised inflation expectations, which in turn pushed market participants to anticipate a more hawkish Federal Reserve, lifting short-dated yields in the process. That relationship held with notable consistency through the March escalation and the months that followed, as energy market shocks and monetary policy expectations fed off each other. What this week’s chart captures is a striking breakdown in that correlation. As oil prices have fallen on the back of the US-Iran memorandum of understanding and the associated unwinding of the geopolitical risk premium, US two-year yields have not followed them lower. The reason is last week’s Federal Reserve meeting. Under new chair Kevin Warsh, the Fed delivered a hawkish dot plot that shifted the median year-end projection to a hike, making clear that the easing cycle previously priced by some market participants is no longer the central scenario. The message is important: the deflationary impulse from lower oil prices is being offset — at least in the Fed’s framing — by persistent underlying inflation pressures and a commitment to keeping policy tight.

260625Z2.jpg

**Flash PMIs Signal Easing Supply Chain Stress and Softer Price Pressures**
June’s flash PMI surveys, released this week across the major advanced economies, provide a timely read on how the global manufacturing and services sectors are absorbing the shifting macro backdrop. Two findings stand out. First, supplier delivery times have improved (or not lengthened as much as they had in the prior two months). This finding coheres naturally with the broader narrative: lower oil prices reduce transport and energy input costs, while the resumption of Strait of Hormuz shipping flows — examined in more detail in chart 4 — is beginning to reduce the freight disruption and re-routing costs that had been building since the conflict escalated. Second, output price inflation in manufacturing has softened, suggesting that some of the pipeline pressure from earlier energy cost spikes is beginning to fade.

260625Z3.jpg

**Hormuz Traffic and Oil: A Coherent Story of Tentative Normalisation**
The recent US-Iran memorandum of understanding to work towards a final deal, though not without subsequent flare-ups, has already brought relief to markets, most visibly in crude oil prices. This should go a long way towards unwinding the inflation-related concerns that previously elevated oil prices had stoked. While the pullback has owed much to anticipation of the glut of pent-up supply expected to follow, certain trackers of shipping volume through the Strait of Hormuz, such as the IMF’s, already point to a marked pickup in traffic, even if it remains well below pre-conflict levels. Should this normalisation of shipping flows persist, it would lend continued justification to a corresponding easing in oil prices, energy-related inflation and, by extension, headline inflation — a welcome development for central banks grappling with the delicate balancing act of reining in price pressures without dampening growth too sharply.

260625Z4.jpg

**South Korea’s Trade Data Flag a Modest Softening in Global Demand**
South Korea’s trade data serve as one of the global economy’s most useful early warning systems. As one of the world’s most open economies, with exports spanning semiconductors, petrochemicals, steel, automobiles and consumer electronics, South Korea’s monthly trade figures provide a timely and broad-based read on the state of global demand. This week’s data show a slightly softer picture than the strong prints that characterised much of the first quarter. Headline export growth has moderated at the margin, and crucially, semiconductor exports — which had been the most dynamic component of the trade data, propelled by AI-related chip demand — have also come in a touch below the exceptional run rates seen earlier in the year. This is not, in itself, alarming: some moderation from peak rates was always to be expected, and the semiconductor cycle remains structurally supported by the scale of AI infrastructure investment globally.

260625Z5.jpg

**A Super El Niño on the Horizon — The Next Inflation Risk**
With that said, while one driver of price pressures seems to be ebbing for now — albeit not without the risk of future flare-ups — another potential inflationary risk looms on the horizon. The chart illustrates the transmission mechanism. It plots Thailand’s milled rice production (left axis) against Australia’s Southern Oscillation Index (right axis), a well-established barometer of El Niño and La Niña conditions. The convention is straightforward: SOI readings persistently above +8 indicate La Niña, associated with above-average rainfall across Southeast Asia and broadly supportive crop conditions; readings persistently below -8 signal El Niño, which brings drought stress and reduced water availability across the region. The historical relationship is striking. The sharp negative SOI troughs around 2002–03, 2009–10 and most dramatically around 2015 all coincide with visible falls in Thai milled rice output. The severe El Niño of 2014–16 produced both the deepest SOI trough in the series and the sharpest single drop in rice production, to below 24,000 thousand tonnes. As meteorological authorities have been warning for some time, the world appears to be facing an imminent Super El Niño event, with the SOI already drifting back towards negative territory in recent months. Were a significant El Niño to materialise in the second half of this year, the implications for Thai rice output — and by extension for Asian food price inflation — could be substantial. Central bankers, in other words, may find themselves having to wrestle with a new inflationary impulse just as they had begun to hope the worst was behind them.

260625Z6.jpg

The mood in global financial markets this week is more settled, though “settled” should not be confused with resolved. The US-Iran memorandum of understanding, signed last week, has continued to do its work: oil prices have fallen further, Strait of Hormuz shipping traffic has picked up measurably, and the risk premium that had been embedded in energy markets since the conflict escalated in March is now visibly unwinding. That is a material development for the inflation outlook, and central bankers will be watching carefully. Yet the picture is not without its complications. Technology stocks — the most conspicuous beneficiary of the prevailing low-rate, high-growth narrative — have been subject to renewed jitters this week, as investors grow more attentive to stretched valuations and the implications of a Federal Reserve that, under new chair Kevin Warsh, is no longer signalling the easing cycle previously priced into markets. Against this backdrop, this week’s charts draw on the latest data to assess where the global economic cycle stands. Equity momentum outside the United States has tracked closely with global growth and inflation surprises, a correlation that tells us something important about how activity is being perceived (chart 1). Meanwhile, the breakdown of the previously tight relationship between oil prices and US two-year yields is arguably one of the more telling market signals of recent weeks (chart 2). June’s flash PMI surveys point to easing supply chain stress and softer output price inflation in manufacturing — a finding that chimes naturally with lower crude prices and the resumption of Hormuz flows (chart 3). The Strait of Hormuz itself deserves a closer look: traffic data and the mechanics of the oil price pullback are telling a coherent story that supports the PMI picture (chart 4). South Korea’s trade data, including semiconductors, offer a slightly softer read on global demand momentum at the margin (chart 5). And looming on the horizon, one new risk is drawing the attention of meteorological authorities: a Super El Niño event whose probability has been rising, with potentially significant implications for food commodity prices and Asian agriculture (chart 6).

<iframe data-testid="embed-iframe" style="border-radius:12px" src="https://open.spotify.com/embed/episode/7ru7psqeY4U7sp8qLdH3J7?utm_source=generator&si=328378479dd94509" width="100%" height="152" frameBorder="0" allowfullscreen="" allow="autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; fullscreen; picture-in-picture" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Charts of the Week: Calmer Waters, New Currents

Michael J. Moran

260625A.jpg

260625B.jpg

The price index for personal consumption expenditures rose 0.4% in May, although the measure almost rounded up to 0.5% (0.4498%). May marked the sixth consecutive month with headline prices increasing 0.3% or more. This series of changes has pulled the year-over-year inflation rate to 4.1%, up from 2.3% just over one year ago (April 2025). Energy prices, of course, have been the most important factor behind the acceleration in inflation, and they remained an issue in May, increasing 4.0% after advances of 3.9% and 11.6% in the prior two months. Food prices have moved erratically in the past year, with jumps and lulls leaving an average monthly increase of 0.2%. The noise was evident in recent months, with food prices increasing only 0.1% in May after a jump of 0.5% in April.

Core prices also have contributed to the pickup in inflation. After averaging monthly increases of 0.24% during 2025, core prices have increased at an average rate of 0.34% so far this year. The year-over-year increase in core inflation totaled 3.4% in May, up from a recent low of 2.6% in April of last year. Both the headline and core inflation rates are uncomfortably above the Federal Reserve’s target of 2.0%.

Total personal income rose briskly in May (0.7%). A surge in farm income played an important role (up 125% month-to-month, most likely reflecting government support payments), but nominal results also were firm elsewhere (up 0.5% ex farm income). Inflation reduced the purchasing power of this income gain, but aggregate income still advanced slightly in real terms (0.2%).

Given the recent surge in energy-driven inflation, May marked only the second monthly increase in real income so far this year. Tight budgets have dampened consumer spending, but individuals have not pulled to the sidelines. Real consumption expenditures rose 0.5% (annual rate) in the first quarter, and results for April and May suggest that real PCE is on track to increase 1.5% to 2.0% in the second quarter.

Households have managed to remain moderately active in their spending by limiting their saving. The saving rate has drifted lower since early 2024 moving to 3.0% in May (chart, below right). The erosion in saving perhaps seems reckless, but some of the reduction could be a response to the strength in the equity market, where wealth gains have possibly limited the incentive to save. Also, larger-than-normal tax refunds this year because of tax cuts in the One Big Beautiful Budget Act have allowed many households to spend actively despite modest increases in real income.

The personal income and consumption figures are available in Haver’s **USECON** database with detail in the **USNA** database. The Action Economics forecasts are in **AS1REPNA**.

260625C.jpg

260625D.jpg

- Energy prices rose sharply for the third consecutive month; core prices were unsettling as well.
- A jump in nominal income translated to a modest advance in real terms, allowing consumers to remain reasonably active.

Personal Income, Consumption, and Prices in May

260625V52.jpg

260625W52.jpg

New orders for durable goods fell 4.5% m/m in May, the first monthly fall in three months, following an upwardly revised 8.5% gain in April (+7.9% initially reported on May 28) and a 1.3% increase in March (unrevised), according to today’s advance report by the U.S. Census Bureau. The Action Economics Forecast Survey had expected a 4.4% m/m May decrease. The year-on-year rate decelerated to -3.5% in May from +17.7% in April (+20.0% in May 2025), marking the first negative reading since December 2024 (-4.5%). Excluding transportation, durable goods orders rose 1.3% (10.2% y/y) in May, the 13th consecutive m/m rise, after a 1.4% increase in April. Meanwhile, durable goods orders excluding defense dropped 4.6% (-5.0% y/y), down for the third time in four months, following an 8.4% April rebound.

The m/m fall in May durable goods orders was driven by a 51.8% m/m plunge in orders for nondefense aircraft & parts, following a 167.4% surge in April and a 23.0% slump in March. Orders for defense aircraft & parts rose 7.9% (63.5% y/y), the fourth successive m/m increase, after gains of 2.5% in April and 23.7% in March. Orders excluding aircraft climbed 1.0% (9.8% y/y), the six straight m/m rise and the 10th in 11 months, after a 1.3% April increase.

Durable goods orders for transportation dropped 14.0% (-22.1% y/y) in May, the first m/m decline since February, following a 22.4% gain in April. In addition to May’s m/m plunge in nondefense aircraft orders and increase in defense aircraft orders, motor vehicles & parts orders rose 1.1% (12.4% y/y), the sixth straight m/m rise, after a 0.7% April increase. Orders for primary metals advanced 3.0% (15.9% y/y), the largest of six successive m/m gains, after a 2.6% April rise. Machinery orders climbed 1.9% (14.0% y/y), up for the 13th straight month, on top of a 1.3% April rise. Orders for fabricated metal products grew 1.5% (11.2% y/y), the third m/m increase in four months, following a 4.1% April gain. Orders for all other durable goods rose 0.8% (3.2% y/y), the strongest of nine consecutive m/m increases, after a 0.1% April uptick. Orders for computers & electronic products rebounded 0.3% (13.3% y/y), the eighth m/m gain in nine months, following a 0.4% April decrease. Orders for electrical equipment, appliances & components recovered 0.3% (5.8% y/y), the second increase in three months, after a 0.2% April decline.

Capital goods orders fell 13.6% (-21.1% y/y) in May, the first m/m fall in three months and the deepest since June 2025, following a 22.2% jump in April. Nondefense capital goods orders dropped 15.7% (-26.4% y/y), the fifth m/m decrease in six months, after a 24.9% April rebound. Core capital goods orders (i.e., nondefense capital goods orders excluding aircraft) rose 1.6% (10.5% y/y), the third m/m gain in four months, reversing a 0.7% April decline. Defense capital goods orders slid 3.4% (+14.4% y/y), the first m/m slide since January, after a 10.4% April gain. Notably, core capital goods shipments (core capex shipments)—a reliable coincident indicator of business spending on equipment in the national accounts—rose 0.3% (7.6% y/y), the eighth m/m rise in nine months, after a 0.5% April increase.

Shipments of all manufactured goods climbed 1.6% (8.9% y/y) in May following a 1.3% gain in April. Durable goods shipments rose 1.0% (8.9% y/y) after a 0.7% April increase. Nondurable goods shipments advanced 2.2% (9.0% y/y), building on a 1.9% April gain. All three series posted the sixth consecutive m/m increase.

Unfilled orders of durable goods rose 0.6% (8.5% y/y) in May, the 10th straight m/m rise, after a 1.8% gain in April. Excluding transportation, unfilled orders increased 0.9% (4.3% y/y), also up for the 10th consecutive month, following a 0.7% April rise.

Manufacturing inventories edged up 0.2% (1.9% y/y) in May, the seventh successive m/m gain, after a 0.3% rise in April. Durable goods inventories grew 0.2% (2.1% y/y), the eighth straight m/m increase, after rising 0.3% in April and March. Nondurable goods inventories, up for the fourth consecutive month, rose 0.3% (1.6% y/y), matching April's pace.

Manufacturers’ orders and shipments of durable and nondurable goods, along with unfilled orders and inventories, are compiled by the U.S. Census Bureau. They are available in Haver’s **USECON** database. The Action Economics forecast data are in the **AS1REPNA** database.

260625X52.jpg

260625Y52.jpg

- May headline orders -4.5% m/m, first fall in three mths.; -3.5% y/y, first negative reading since Dec. ’24.
- Nondefense aircraft & parts -51.8% m/m vs. April’s +167.4%.
- Transportation orders -14.0%, first m/m drop since Feb.; orders ex transp. +1.3%, 13th straight m/m rise.
- Core capital goods shipments +0.3%, eighth gain in nine mths., pointing to a moderate contribution to Q2’26 GDP from business equipt. spending.
- Durable goods shipments +1.0%; unfilled orders +0.6%; inventories +0.2%.

Economy in Brief

Jump to:

MAPI Business Outlook Survey Off FurtherĀĀ

Rebound in Canadian Labor Market after Summer Pause

ISM Nonmanufacturing Index Recovered

U.S. Payroll Report: More Upward Revisions

U.S. Payroll Report: More Upward Revisions

German Labor Markets Show More Distinct Gain

Challenger Layoffs Back Down

U.S. Factory Inventory Accumulation Continued