Carol Stone, CBE

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/031112b.jpg" width="353">
Labor market conditions improved modestly in the three months ended September (data the UK Office of National Statistics reports as values for &quot;August&quot;, that is, a centered 3-month average). Employment rose 28,000 from its total three months before (the comparison emphasized by the ONS in its data press release) and up 309,000 from a year ago. These totals have been revised upward somewhat this month to account for new population benchmarks. The unemployment rate held steady at 5.0%, showing very little movement over the last nine months. As we noted here in October, the number of claims for the &quot;Jobseeker&#39;s Allowance&quot;, the so-called claimant count, is falling; it is now down for a fifth month, 3,300 in the latest month and 15,300 over the last year. Workers&#39; earnings rose at a 3.6% pace in the July-September quarter, picking up from prior months&#39; increases.
One facet of the employment gain in the &quot;August&quot; period highlights a developing trend. Older workers, men over 65 and women over 60, are increasing their participation in the job market. Their economic activity rates (comparable to participation rates in the US) are rising markedly, with that for men at 8.8% in the August period, up 0.8% from a year ago, and for women at 9.6%, up 0.4% from the 2002 period. By contrast, the economic activity rate for the population in the working age range, 16 to 64/59, is up only 0.1% on the year to 78.7%. In the latest 3-month period, &quot;August&quot; vs. &quot;May&quot;, employment in the standard working age group fell 3,000, but employment of those older rose 32,000. Such absolute out-performance is not frequent, but proportionately, older workers are accounting for a substantial portion of job growth. In the last two 3-month periods, some 27% of the 12-month job gains have occurred in this population group, which covers only 3% of the economically active population and 22.5% of the total population over age 16.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">UK: Selected Labor Market Indicators</th>
<th scope="col">&quot;Sep&quot; (3 mos ended Oct)</th>
<th scope="col">&quot;Aug&quot;&nbsp;(3&nbsp; mos ended Sep)</th>
<th scope="col">&quot;Jul&quot; (3&nbsp; mos ended Aug)</th>
<th scope="col">Year Ago (&quot;Aug&quot;)</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
<th scope="col">2000</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Unemployment Rate (%)</td>
<td>N.A.</td>
<td>5.0</td>
<td>5.0</td>
<td>5.3</td>
<td>5.2</td>
<td>5.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Claimant Count (thous.)</td>
<td>926.9*</td>
<td>930.2*</td>
<td>931.7*</td>
<td>942.2*</td>
<td>946.8</td>
<td>970.1</td>
<td>1,088.4</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Labor Force Employment (thous.)</td>
<td>N.A.</td>
<td>28,151</td>
<td>28,109</td>
<td>27,842</td>
<td>27,846</td>
<td>27,658</td>
<td>27,425</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Average Earnings Index: &quot;Headline Rate&quot; (% Change)</td>
<td>N.A.</td>
<td>3.6</td>
<td>3.4</td>
<td>3.7</td>
<td>3.5</td>
<td>4.6</td>
<td>4.6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Labor market conditions improved modestly in the three months ended September (data the UK Office of National Statistics reports as values for "August", that is, a centered 3-month average). Employment rose 28,000 from its total three [...]

Older Workers Increase Role in UK Job Market

Tom Moeller

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/031112a.jpg" width="353">
Prices for industrial commodities added to earlier gains and through October jumped roughly 10% versus August. The JoC-ECRI Industrial Price Index has leveled off recently.
Strength in the metals sub-index has cooled the past month, but prices for steel scrap (24.1% y/y), aluminum (9.9% y/y) and copper scrap (32.7% y/y) all remained firm.
Prices for lumber &amp; plywood retreated nearly 20% from the late Summer highs but lately have stabilized. Textile prices also are down modestly from the highs as gains in cotton prices slowed during the last three weeks (62.0% y/y).
Energy prices recently have moved erratically higher, though they remain below earlier peaks.

</body>
</html>

Prices for industrial commodities added to earlier gains and through October jumped roughly 10% versus August. The JoC-ECRI Industrial Price Index has leveled off recently. Strength in the metals sub-index has cooled the past month, [...]

Commodity Prices Higher

Louise Curley

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/031111c.jpg" width="353">
The ZEW Index that measures investors&#39; expectations of economic growth rose to 67.2 in November from 60.3 in October and was at its highest level since July, 2002. Movements in the index often foreshadow those of the broader IFO index that measures businessmen&#39;s expectations. Investors, however, tend to be more optimistic and more volatile than the business men as can be seen in the attached chart.
Increased confidence has yet to result in any significant upturn in the German economy. However, those developments that have recently led to the increased confidence, such as growing exports in spite of the rise in the Euro, the irregular, but definitely upward trend in manufacturing new orders and a small decline in the unemployment rate, have only recently begun to surface. Developments such as these, are usually the precursors of increased demand that eventually leads to higher production. The rising confidence on the part of investors suggests that these underlying developments may be gathering strength.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">

</table>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">NOV 2003</th>
<th scope="col">OCT 2003</th>
<th scope="col">SEP 2003&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">AUG 2003</th>
<th scope="col">JUL 2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">ZEW (% balance)</td>
<td>67.2</td>
<td>60.3</td>
<td>60.9</td>
<td>52.5</td>
<td>41.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">IFO&nbsp; Expectation 6 mo. (% balance)</td>
<td>n.a.</td>
<td>10.3</td>
<td>5.1</td>
<td>-0.8</td>
<td>-4.4</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Manufacturing new orders (2002=100)</td>
<td>n.a.</td>
<td>n.a.</td>
<td>98.3</td>
<td>97.2</td>
<td>97.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Foreign</td>
<td>n.a.</td>
<td>n.a.</td>
<td>103.6</td>
<td>103.8</td>
<td>102.1</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Domestic</td>
<td>n.a.</td>
<td>n.a.</td>
<td>94.0</td>
<td>91.9</td>
<td>93.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Merchandise Exports&nbsp; (Bil. Euros)</td>
<td>n.a.</td>
<td>n.a.</td>
<td>58.58</td>
<td>55.61</td>
<td>55.06</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Unemployment Rate (%)</td>
<td>n.a.</td>
<td>10.5</td>
<td>10.5</td>
<td>10.6</td>
<td>10.6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

The ZEW Index that measures investors' expectations of economic growth rose to 67.2 in November from 60.3 in October and was at its highest level since July, 2002. Movements in the index often foreshadow those of the broader IFO index [...]

ZEW Index of German Confidence Rises to Highest Level in Sixteen Months

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/031111b.jpg" width="353">
Chain store sales jumped 1.2% in the opening week of November according to the BTM-UBSW survey.
Sales began the month of November 0.9% ahead of last month&#39;s average. That followed a 0.6% m/m decline during all of October.
During the last five years there has been a 61% correlation between the year-to-year percent change in the BTM-UBSW measure of chain store sales and the change in non-auto retail sales less gasoline.
The BTM-UBSW retail chain-store sales index is constructed using the same-store sales reported by 78 stores of seven retailers: Dayton Hudson, Federated, Kmart, May, J.C. Penney, Sears and Wal-Mart.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"> <a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/surveyw/@S2/@S2.HTM">BTM-UBSW (SA, 1977=100)</a></th>
<th scope="col">11/08/03</th>
<th scope="col">11/01/03</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
<th scope="col">2000</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Total Weekly Retail Chain Store Sales</td>
<td>425.3</td>
<td>420.3</td>
<td>5.8%</td>
<td>3.6%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Gasoline Prices Down Sharply From Peak 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom Moeller</a> November 11, 2003


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/031111a.jpg" width="353">
Retail gasoline prices fell sharply last week to $1.50 per gallon. That added to earlier declines and pulled prices down 14% versus the peak of $1.75 in early September.
Crude oil prices also have fallen during the period. The price of West Texas Intermediate crude was $30.88 per barrel yesterday (19.1% y/y) versus a June high near $32.00 and a March high near $37.00.
Wholesale natural gas prices have trended lower recently to $4.37/mmbtu (12.1% y/y), down from the cold-weather spike over $12.00 in late February.
For the latest Short Term Energy Outlook from the US Department of Energy click <a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/steo/pub/contents.html">here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/weekly/@W4/@W403/@W40303/@W40303.HTM"> US Retail Gasoline Prices</a></th>
<th scope="col">11/10/03</th>
<th scope="col">12/30/02</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
<th scope="col">2000</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">All Formulations ($/Gal.)</td>
<td>$1.50</td>
<td>$1.44</td>
<td>4.5%</td>
<td>$1.34</td>
<td>$1.42</td>
<td>$1.48</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Chain store sales jumped 1.2% in the opening week of November according to the BTM-UBSW survey. Sales began the month of November 0.9% ahead of last month's average. That followed a 0.6% m/m decline during all of October. During the [...]

Weekly Chain Store Sales Jump

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/031110b.jpg" width="353">
Although total merchandise exports and imports in Taiwan declined in the month of October, the trend toward increased trade with Asia and declining trade with North America continues. In October, exports to Asia were up 18.9% from a year ago, while exports to North America were up only 1.7%.
Similarly, imports from Asia were 15.1% greater in October of this year compared with October 2002, while imports from North America were 3.3% over the same period.
On the basis of the data for the year to date, Taiwan&#39;s surplus on trade with North America is still averaging about $10 billion a year as the decline in exports has been matched by a decline in imports. However, Taiwan&#39;s trade balance with Asia, which was in deficit to the amount of $1.8 billion in 2000, is currently averaging a surplus of about $12 billion.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">

</table>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">&nbsp;&nbsp; Billions of US$</th>
<th scope="col">Oct 2003</th>
<th scope="col">Sep 2003</th>
<th scope="col">Oct 2002&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">M/M&nbsp; %</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y&nbsp; %</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
<th scope="col">2000</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Total Trade</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Exports</td>
<td>12372.6</td>
<td>12893.7</td>
<td>10834.5</td>
<td>-4.04</td>
<td>14.20</td>
<td>130456.5</td>
<td>123426.0</td>
<td>148226.0</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Imports</td>
<td>9800.7</td>
<td>11131.3</td>
<td>9181.1</td>
<td>-11.95</td>
<td>6.75</td>
<td>112230.1</td>
<td>107738.8</td>
<td>139875.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Balance</td>
<td>2571.9</td>
<td>1762.4</td>
<td>1653.4</td>
<td>45.93</td>
<td>55.55</td>
<td>18226.4</td>
<td>15687.2</td>
<td>8350.6</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Trade with Asia</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Exports</td>
<td>7382.7</td>
<td>7697.2</td>
<td>6209.3</td>
<td>-4.09</td>
<td>18.89</td>
<td>74216.8</td>
<td>64921.4</td>
<td>79582.5</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Imports</td>
<td>6142.0</td>
<td>6424.2</td>
<td>533.6</td>
<td>-4.39</td>
<td>15.10</td>
<td>63887.6</td>
<td>58818.3</td>
<td>78385.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Balance</td>
<td>1240.8</td>
<td>1273.1</td>
<td>873.0</td>
<td>-2.54</td>
<td>42.12</td>
<td>10329.2</td>
<td>6103.2</td>
<td>-1802.8</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Trade with N. A.</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Exports</td>
<td>2262.1</td>
<td>2432.8</td>
<td>2225.4</td>
<td>-4.02</td>
<td>1.65</td>
<td>28278.4</td>
<td>29319.1</td>
<td>36669.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Imports</td>
<td>1468.3</td>
<td>1617.8</td>
<td>1352.0</td>
<td>-9.24</td>
<td>8.60</td>
<td>19078.7</td>
<td>19258.0</td>
<td>26310.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Balance</td>
<td>793.8</td>
<td>815</td>
<td>873.4</td>
<td>-2.60</td>
<td>-9.11</td>
<td>9199.7</td>
<td>10061.1</td>
<td>10359.3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Although total merchandise exports and imports in Taiwan declined in the month of October, the trend toward increased trade with Asia and declining trade with North America continues. In October, exports to Asia were up 18.9% from a [...]

Taiwanese Merchandise Trade: Shifting Trade Patterns

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/031110a.jpg" width="353">
The Federal Reserve reported that consumer credit outstanding (which excludes mortgages) rose $15.1B (9.7% AR) in September. It was the sharpest one-month rise since this past January. Consensus expectations had been for a $6.0B gain.
During the first nine months of this year, consumer credit usage rose at a 5.4% annual rate.
The surge in non-revolving credit extension (which excludes auto loans) at a 12.5% SAAR in September may have reflected the recent addition of student loans extended by the federal government and Sallie Mae to the Consumer Credit Outstanding figures.Not seasonally adjusted, these loans jumped $4.6B (-6.3% y/y) during September. Loans underwritten by finance companies also were strong, up $5.3B (7.3% y/y). 
Revolving credit rose at a 5.0% annual rate in September following a 2.9% gain in August.
An article from the Federal Reserve Bulletin highlighting recent changes to a measure of US household debt service can be found <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/bulletin/2003/1003lead.pdf"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@E1/@E103/@E10308/@E10308.HTM"> Consumer Credit Outstanding</a></th>
<th scope="col">Sept m/m</th>
<th scope="col">Aug m/m</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
<th scope="col">2000</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Total</td>
<td>$15.1B</td>
<td>$8.8B</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
<td>4.3%</td>
<td>7.3%</td>
<td>11.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Revolving</td>
<td>$3.0B</td>
<td>$1.7B</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
<td>1.5%</td>
<td>5.1%</td>
<td>11.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Nonrevolving</td>
<td>$12.1B</td>
<td>$7.1B</td>
<td>5.2%</td>
<td>6.0%</td>
<td>8.8%</td>
<td>11.4%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

The Federal Reserve reported that consumer credit outstanding (which excludes mortgages) rose $15.1B (9.7% AR) in September. It was the sharpest one-month rise since this past January. Consensus expectations had been for a $6.0B gain. [...]

Consumer Credit Usage Jumped

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/031107c.jpg" width="353">
Industrial production fell in Germany in September, down 1.2% after a 3.7% decline in August. Forecasters had looked for a GAIN of 1.6%.
Chemicals, machinery and electrical equipment had the largest decreases in the month, while output of metals industries rebounded sharply following a big drop in August.
This performance in such a basic gauge as industrial production is disappointing in a country where industry is as important as in Germany. Other recent data suggested that Europe&#39;s largest economy would soon break out of a slowdown that had cut short the recovery from the 2001 recession. As noted here the other day, business confidence in West Germany has been rising sharply. The widely followed &quot;Ifo&quot; survey has shown notable improvement, and the latest PMI data also indicate that manufacturing companies judge that their activity has been picking up.
Two caveats might help explain this apparent contradiction. First, while the total Ifo climate index has been trending upward, the component of &quot;confidence&quot; in current conditions has been less exuberant. That index is more coincident with current production than the overall Ifo number, which includes expectations. As seen in the accompanying chart, the confidence index has been quite lackluster in recent months. Secondly, while the sentiment and PMI survey data have been on upward paths, they remain at relatively low levels. The Ifo climate index for all sectors was still down at -12.4 in September and &quot;improved&quot; in October to -7.8. The confidence sub-index for all industries remained well down in a range near -25 even through October. Manufacturing confidence, shown in the table below, is somewhat better, but still not even near zero. Further, the PMI for manufacturing was below the 50% breakeven threshold until September, and even the two latest readings in &quot;growth&quot; territory, September&#39;s 50.2 and October&#39;s 51.2, point to only modestly increasing activity. So continued weakness in actual industrial output might not be a complete surprise. The favorable trends in those auxiliary indicators give hope for stronger production to come, but it seems not to be here yet.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">

</table>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">Germany: Selected Industrial Indicators</th>
<th scope="col">Oct 2003</th>
<th scope="col">Sept 2003</th>
<th scope="col">Aug 2003</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y&nbsp; %</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
<th scope="col">2000</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Industrial Production, Total</td>
<td>N.A.</td>
<td>-1.2%</td>
<td>-3.7%</td>
<td>-3.6%</td>
<td>-1.3%</td>
<td>-0.1%</td>
<td>5.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Industrial Production, excl Construction</td>
<td>N.A.</td>
<td>-1.5%</td>
<td>-3.5%</td>
<td>-3.3%</td>
<td>-1.2%</td>
<td>0.5%</td>
<td>6.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Ifo Business Climate: West Germany, Manufacturing (diffusion index)</td>
<td>1.6</td>
<td>-5.0</td>
<td>-6.5</td>
<td>-9.4 (Oct &#39;02)</td>
<td>-8.2</td>
<td>-10.1</td>
<td>11.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Ifo Business Confidence: West Germany, Manufacturing (diffusion index)</td>
<td>-15.6</td>
<td>-21.2</td>
<td>-18.1</td>
<td>-18.6 (Oct &#39;02)</td>
<td>-20.7</td>
<td>-6.1</td>
<td>13.4</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">PMI, German Manufacturing</td>
<td>51.18</td>
<td>50.22</td>
<td>48.75</td>
<td>48.36 (Oct &#39;02)</td>
<td>48.16</td>
<td>47.46</td>
<td>57.15</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Industrial production fell in Germany in September, down 1.2% after a 3.7% decline in August. Forecasters had looked for a GAIN of 1.6%. Chemicals, machinery and electrical equipment had the largest decreases in the month, while [...]

German Industrial Production Sags, Despite Better "Business Climate"

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/031107a.jpg">
Nonfarm payrolls have been firmer during the last three months than previously perceived. October payrolls rose 126,000 versus Consensus expectations for a 50,000 rise. September payrolls were revised to +125,000 from +57,000. August payrolls were revised to +35,000 from -41,000.
Job growth during these three months amounts to 0.9% (AR), the strongest three-month growth since January 2001.
The one-month diffusion index (breadth of gain) for private nonfarm payrolls fell slightly to 48.2.
Service producing jobs rose 143,000 (0.2% y/y) and were the source for most of the upward revisions to payrolls. The gains were widespread amongst service industries.
Strong monthly gains were logged in temporary help services (4.0% y/y), education &amp; health (1.9% y/y), professional &amp; business services (0.8% y/y), retail trade (-0.1% y/y) and leisure (0.4% y/y). Government sector jobs rose 10,000 (-0.3% y/y).
Declines in manufacturing sector payrolls continued, down another 24,000 (-4.0% y/y). The one-month diffusion index for factory payrolls was unchanged at a quite low 29.8. Construction jobs rose 6,000 (1.9% y/y).
From the separate household survey, the unemployment rate fell to 6.0% versus expectations for 6.1%. Employment surged 441,000 (0.7% y/y) following a slight September drop. The labor force jumped 248,000 (1.0% y/y).
Average hourly earnings rose a modest 0.1%, a 2.1% rate YTD.
The index of aggregate hours worked rose 0.4% and was up at a 2.0% annual rate from 3Q. Hours worked fell in 3Q versus 2Q.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">

</table>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@EB/@EB01/@EB01.HTM"> Employment</a></th>
<th scope="col">Oct</th>
<th scope="col">Sept</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
<th scope="col">2000</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Payroll Employment</td>
<td>126,000</td>
<td>125,000</td>
<td>-0.2%</td>
<td>-1.1%</td>
<td>0.0%</td>
<td>2.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Manufacturing</td>
<td>-24,000</td>
<td>-28,000</td>
<td>-4.0%</td>
<td>-6.9%</td>
<td>-4.8%</td>
<td>-0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Average Weekly Hours</td>
<td>33.8</td>
<td>33.7</td>
<td>33.8</td>
<td>33.9</td>
<td>34.0</td>
<td>34.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Average Hourly Earnings</td>
<td>0.1%</td>
<td>0.0%</td>
<td>2.4%</td>
<td>2.9%</td>
<td>3.8%</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Unemployment Rate</td>
<td>6.0%</td>
<td>6.1%</td>
<td>5.8%</td>
<td>5.8%</td>
<td>4.8%</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
OECD Leaders Strong 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom Moeller</a> November 7, 2003


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/031107b.jpg">
The OECD Index of Leading Indicators (Big 7) rose in September for the sixth consecutive month. The 1.1% increase was the strongest monthly increase since February 2002.
The latest increase pulled the leading index up to its trend level.
Gains amongst the member country leading indexes were broad and strong. The leading index for the European Union rose 1.0% (3.5% y/y), the strongest monthly gain since 1975.
In France, the leading index rose 0.6% (2.9% y/y) and tepid gains in recent months were revised up sharply. The leaders in Germany jumped 1.2% (4.9% y/y. In Italy the leaders surged 1.8% (2.7% y/y).
Leaders in Japan, up 1.5%, posted the strongest one month gain since 1987. The three-month growth rate remained strong at 14.3%.
In Canada the September leading index surged for the second month, up 1.5% (5.0% y/y). In the U.K. the leaders managed the sixth respectable monthly increase in September, up 0.4% m/m (0.0% y/y).
Leading indicators in the United States rose strongly for the sixth straight month.
Visit the OECD&#39;s website at this <a href="http://www.oecd.org/home/">website</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/OECDMEI/OECDMEI.HTM">OECD Main Economic Indicators</a></th>
<th scope="col">Sept</th>
<th scope="col">Aug</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
<th scope="col">2000</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">OECD Major Seven - Leading Index (Trend Restored)</td>
<td>124.0</td>
<td>122.6</td>
<td>5.7%</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>-2.3%</td>
<td>3.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; European Union</td>
<td>120.8</td>
<td>119.6</td>
<td>3.5%</td>
<td>3.1%</td>
<td>-1.9%</td>
<td>3.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Japan</td>
<td>106.0</td>
<td>104.5</td>
<td>5.0%</td>
<td>0.7%</td>
<td>-2.9%</td>
<td>2.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; United States</td>
<td>135.9</td>
<td>134.8</td>
<td>7.6%</td>
<td>5.6%</td>
<td>-2.7%</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Nonfarm payrolls have been firmer during the last three months than previously perceived. October payrolls rose 126,000 versus Consensus expectations for a 50,000 rise. September payrolls were revised to +125,000 from +57,000. August [...]

U.S. Non-farm Payrolls Rose

Subdued global shipping costs not yet pointing to supply chain problems

PMIs show still-elevated but slowing US inflation

AI boosting US investment in data centers

US productivity growth has been significantly faster than in other major economies

Consumers' short-term US inflation expectations still elevated while longer-term expectations of financial markets are steady

US financial markets have gotten used to elevated policy uncertainty

FOMC now expects more rate cuts going forward than in June

China gaining ASEAN exports while US exports slump

Job openings less than the number unemployed in July for first time since 2021

Reaccelerating goods price inflation along with sticky services inflation clouds the outlook

Falling oil prices aren't pulling down inflation expectations, pointing to a boost from increased tariffs

Equity market exuberance outpacing macroeconomic data

Apart from Japan, Blue Chip forecasters expect further sizable monetary easing

US production rebounded in Q2, but demand continued to slow

US leader, Germany trailer for real GDP growth over past 3 years

Negative US inflation surprises leading G10 down

Deflation continues in China

Incoming data surprising on downside in US; positive surprises elsewhere

FOMC expects more inflation and less growth than in March

With escalation of Israel/Iran conflict, geopolitical risk has recently surged while US trade policy uncertainty has ebbed

Renewed supply chain pressures point to a rebound in global inflation ahead

Apart from Japan, Blue Chip forecasters look for further significant monetary policy easing

Apart from the US, productivity is moribund

Financial market concerns ebb even though policy uncertainty continues to soar

US tariff revenues nearly doubled in April

Our global data offering is unparalleled in terms of coverage, quality, and organization. We offer 290+ databases from 2500 government and private sources, a wealth of key survey and forecast data covering the world’s economies, and a robust offering of archive databases that drive machine learning for big data applications.

Optimized for precision analytics, our data is seamlessly integrated with Microsoft Office and all leading statistical packages through our DLX® software and platform independent HaverView™ website. We further offer direct database feeds, client server or cloud-based delivery, and RESTful API.


Privacy Policy

Disclaimer

Contact us

A premier time series data platform for the global strategy, research, and quant communities. 

London

Singapore

Tokyo

New York

Economy in Brief

Viewpoints

Contact Us

Our Data

Our Products

What We Do

Our Authors

About Us

Data News

Resources

Release Calendars

Training Center

Webinars

Newsletters

Download Software

For Clients

Live Updates

251103F4.jpg

251103G4.jpg

U.S. light vehicle sales dove 6.9% (-4.5% y/y) in October to 15.48 million units (SAAR) after holding steady at 16.62 million units in September. Sales fell broadly. 

Light truck sales slid 6.9% (-1.4% y/y) in October to 12.90 million units, after rising 0.9% in September. Purchases of domestically-made light trucks fell 7.9% (+1.4% y/y) to 10.10 million units, the lowest level since February, after rising 3.4% in September. Sales of imported light trucks fell 2.8% (-10.3% y/y) to 2.80 million units, following a 7.4% September decline.

Trucks’ 83.3% share of the light vehicle market last month was steady with September and compared to 82.6% in August, and to 80.7% in October of last year. The share has averaged 82.4% so far this year versus 56.5% ten years earlier.

Passenger car sales declined 6.9% (-17.6% y/y) last month to 2.58 million, after falling 4.8% in September. Purchases of domestically-produced cars fell 7.2% (-16.5% y/y) last month to 1.93 million units, after weakening 7.1% in September. Imported auto sales declined 4.5% (-22.0% y/y) to 0.64 million units after holding steady in September.

Imports' 22.2% share of the U.S. light vehicle market rose from 21.4% in September. These compared to a high of 26.3% in November of 2023. Imports' share of the passenger car market edged up to 24.8% last month from 24.2% in September. It reached a high of 38.1% in September 2021. Imports' share of the light truck market increased to 21.7% last month from 20.8% in September.

U.S. vehicle sales figures can be found in Haver's **USECON** database. Additional detail by manufacturer is in the **INDUSTRY** database.

251103H4.jpg

251103I4.jpg

- Light truck sales and auto purchases decline m/m.
- Total sales decline sharply y/y.
- Imports' market share declines.

U.S. Light Vehicle Sales Fall Sharply in October

251103J1.jpg

251103K1.jpg

Factory sector activity remains under pressure. The ISM U.S. manufacturing PMI declined to 48.7 in October after rising to 49.1 during September from 48.7 in August, according to the Institute for Supply Management. These figures are below the 50 expansion-contraction dividing line. As a result, they continue to indicate that the U.S. manufacturing sector weakened for the eighth consecutive month. The reading remained remain above, however, a low of 46.9 in October of last year. A November index of 49.4 had been expected in the Action Economics Forecast Survey.

The production component declined to 48.2 last month after rising to 51.0 in September. It remained increased from an April low of 44.0. A lessened 27.3% (NSA) of respondents reported higher production while an increased 22.0% reported lower output levels. The inventory reading fell to a 12-month low of 45.8 from 47.7 in September. A lessened 13.2% (NSA) of respondents raised inventories while a higher 21.7% shed them.

Working higher, the new orders index rose to 49.4 during October from 48.9 in September. An increased 20.4% (NSA) of respondents reported new orders improvement while 26.0% reported a decline. The employment index increased to a five-month high of 46.0 last month after rising to 45.3 in September. An increased 13.1% (NSA) of respondents more hiring while 22.3% reported less. The supplier delivery index rose to 54.2 in October from 52.6 in September. Twelve percent (NSA) of respondents reported slower product delivery speeds while 3.2% reported a quickening.

The prices index weakened to 58.0 (NSA) during October from 61.9 in September. It was below a high of 69.8 in April, and well above its low of 39.4 in December 2022. A lessened 27.3% of respondents reported higher prices, a nine month low, while an increased 8.7% reported lower.

In other series, the export orders index rose to a seasonally adjusted 44.5 in October after falling sharply to 43.0 in September. It remained up from 40.1 May low. The imports index edged up to 45.2 last month from 44.7 in September. The index is below a high of 52.6 in February.

The ISM figures are based on responses from over 400 purchasing and supply executives from 18 industries, which are weighted according to each industry’s contribution to GDP. These data are diffusion indexes where a reading above 50 indicates expansion; below 50 indicates contraction. The ISM Manufacturing PMI is a composite index based on the diffusion indexes of five of the indexes (seasonally adjusted) with equal weights: New Orders, Production, Employment, Supplier Deliveries, and Inventories. The figures from the Institute for Supply Management can be found in Haver’s **USECON** database; further detail is found in the **SURVEYS** database. The expectations number is available in Haver’s **AS1REPNA** database.

251103L1.jpg

251103M1.jpg

- Decline reverses all of September increase.					
- Lower production offsets new orders rise.
- Price index falls to nine-month low.

U.S. ISM Manufacturing PMI Eases in October; Price Index Declines Sharply

Tian Yong Woon

This week, we review a wave of key developments across Asia following US President Trump’s tour of the region last week. A central theme concerned countries courting closer ties with the US to avoid harsher actions, while also boosting regional cooperation amid trade barriers and scrutiny of China. This push for closer ties has manifested through new and updated trade agreements—ironically driven by ongoing uncertainty in global trade and supply chains, with US–China relations at the core. A major outcome of Trump’s trip was the new US–China trade agreement, which included the US halving tariffs on Chinese fentanyl-related products to 10%, while China suspended rare earth export controls and resumed soybean purchases vital to the US (chart 1). Perhaps more importantly, the deal signalled a small conciliatory shift and avoided a potentially worse outcome. Beyond the US–China agreement at the APEC Summit in South Korea, the US–South Korea trade deal also gained more clarity. Under the deal, US auto tariffs on South Korea has fallen to 15%, matching the rate applied to Japan and likely providing relief for South Korean automakers (chart 2).

Trump’s visit to Japan was another highlight. Relations with new Prime Minister Takaichi got off to a strong start, and further details emerged on Japan’s previously cited $550 billion investment commitment in the US—substantial even relative to Japan’s existing direct investment there (chart 3). However, specifics on the timing and implementation of the investment remain limited. Meanwhile, at the ASEAN Summit earlier in the week, aside from Trump’s engagements, the bloc officially welcomed its 11th member—Timor-Leste—the first new member in decades—granting it access to the bloc’s mechanisms and potentially supporting a catch-up in economic development (chart 5). Looking ahead, the focus on China and Japan is likely to continue, with China set to release its October trade (chart 6) and CPI data, and Japan scheduled to report employee wages and household spending.

**The APEC summit**
The US and China made a modest but meaningful step forward on trade following the Trump–Xi meeting at the APEC Summit in South Korea. The US lowered tariffs on Chinese fentanyl-related products to 10% from 20% and suspended enforcement of rules targeting subsidiaries of blacklisted firms—previous points of contention for Beijing. In return, China pledged stronger efforts to curb fentanyl flows, paused rare earth export controls for a year, and resumed purchases of US soybeans—significant given its historically large share of US export demand (chart 1). While not a comprehensive reset, these moves eased immediate tensions and helped avert more severe outcomes, including Trump’s previously threatened 100% tariff hike. The tone of the meeting also suggests a more conciliatory shift, though relations remain fragile and the risk of renewed escalation is still material.

251103T1.jpg

Beyond the headline-grabbing US–China trade deal, the APEC Summit in South Korea also saw the US reach a trade agreement with South Korea. Under the deal, US tariffs on South Korean autos and auto parts have fallen to 15% from 25%, matching the US tariff rate on Japanese autos and providing relief to South Korea’s sizable automotive export sector (chart 2). The agreement also clarified South Korea’s supposed $350 billion investment in the US: $200 billion in cash, capped at $20 billion per year to avoid currency market distortions, with the remaining $150 billion directed toward shipbuilding cooperation. While also not a major breakthrough, the deal represents incremental progress, addressing prior uncertainties and signalling steps toward a more favourable trade framework.

251103T2.jpg

**US President Trump’s Japan Visit**
Turning to US President Trump’s visit to Japan last week, new Prime Minister Takaichi appears to have gotten off to a strong start, with Trump hailing US–Japan relations as entering a “NEW GOLDEN AGE.” The two countries signed several agreements, including a Technology Prosperity Deal, and deepened cooperation on critical minerals and rare earths. Japan’s previously vague $550 billion investment commitment in the US is now somewhat clearer: up to $332 billion will support critical US infrastructure, $30 billion will target AI, and $15 billion will go toward electronics and supply chains, among other areas. While the headline figure is substantial—even relative to Japan’s already significant direct investment assets in the US (chart 3)—the open-ended nature of the commitment and the lack of a clear timeline leave its actual impact uncertain.

251103T3.jpg

**The ASEAN summits**
Whilst US President Trump’s attendance at the ASEAN–US Summit in Malaysia dominated headlines, there were also several other notable developments at last week’s ASEAN meetings in Kuala Lumpur. Most prominently, Timor-Leste was officially admitted as ASEAN’s eleventh member, following a two-decade accession process during which the country actively aligned its political and economic frameworks with ASEAN standards. Membership grants Timor-Leste access to the bloc’s broader security and economic mechanisms and could open further avenues for trade, investment, and development cooperation. Nonetheless, the country still has considerable ground to make up relative to its new ASEAN peers, particularly in terms of both GDP and GDP per capita (chart 4).

251103T4.jpg

The accession of Timor-Leste into ASEAN aside, last week’s summits also brought a number of economic developments for the bloc. More concretely, ASEAN and China signed an upgrade to their free trade agreement last week, bringing the deal to so-called version 3.0. The upgraded deal (ACFTA 3.0) introduces commitments in new areas such as Digital Economy, Green Economy, and Supply Chain Connectivity, among other themes. And notably, just as the US and ASEAN have found common ground to collaborate in fields such as those relating to rare earths, given how the US has seen vulnerabilities arising from this space given China’s dominance in the field, China has taken the year’s US-China frictions to foster closer ties with its neighbours in the region, including the collectively sizable ASEAN bloc. Just by the trade dimension alone, China-ASEAN-11 trade has growth significantly this year (chart 2), although the economies’ total trade with the US also rose, and at a more significant pace, despite tariff measures.

251103T5.jpg

Looking ahead, investors will focus on a series of China-related releases this week, notably the Caixin PMI readings, as well as October trade and CPI inflation data. These indicators will help gauge the economy’s performance under ongoing US tariffs and assess domestic demand and supply conditions, all in the broader context of recent US–China interactions during Trump’s Asia tour. In Japan, attention will turn to updated data on employee wages and household spending, which—together with developments in the external environment—will shape expectations for the Bank of Japan’s future policy stance. Elsewhere in the region, investors will watch interest rate decisions from Australia and Malaysia, where rates are expected to remain unchanged, as well as GDP readings from Indonesia and the Philippines.

251103T6.jpg

Asia

Economic Letter from Asia: Come Together

251031A2.jpg

251031D2.jpg

The Industrial Materials Price Index from the Foundation for International Business and Economic Research (FIBER) improved 0.3% during the four weeks ended October 31, 2025 after holding steady in the prior four week period. The index increased 0.8% y/y.

**Metals** group prices increased 4.3% (6.1% y/y) in the last four weeks as the cost of aluminum rose 7.0% (9.5% y/y). Copper scrap prices improved 6.5% (16.4% y/y) while zinc prices strengthened 6.8% in four weeks (3.0% y/y). Steel scrap prices rose 2.3% (-6.6% y/y) and tin prices increased 2.2% (16.1% y/y). Lead prices improved 1.1% (unchanged y/y) in four weeks.

Prices in the **Textile** group increased 1.2% during the last four weeks, and rose 2.4% y/y. The cost of burlap strengthened 14.5% in the last four weeks while surging 37.6% over the last year. Offsetting this rise, cotton prices fell 1.2% and declined 5.8% y/y.

**Miscellaneous** group prices weakened 3.0% in the last four weeks, unchanged y/y, as framing lumber prices fell 6.5% (+4.1% y/y). The cost of tallow, used for frying & baking, declined 13.1% (+11.2% y/y) in four weeks. Offsetting this weakness, natural rubber prices held steady (-10.1% y/y).

Prices in the **crude oil & benzene** group declined 1.7% (-9.3% y/y) in the last four weeks. The cost of West Texas Intermediate crude oil fell 3.1% in four weeks to $60.80 per barrel and declined 11.7% y/y. The price was increased from a low of $58.47 in the third week of the month. The price of the petro-chemical benzene fell 2.9% (-23.3% y/y) in four weeks.

**Excluding crude oil**, the industrial commodity price index rose 0.5% (1.6% y/y) over the last four weeks, the same as during the prior four weeks.

The Foundation for International Business and Economic Research (FIBER) develops economic measurement techniques as applied to business cycles and inflation in the U.S. and other market economies. The commodity price data can be found in Haver's **DAILY**, **WEEKLY**, **USECON** and **CMDTY** databases.

251031C2.jpg

251031B2.jpg

- Metals and textile prices strengthen.
- Framing lumber costs backpedal.
- Crude oil prices weaken.

FIBER: Industrial Commodity Price Index Edges Higher in Latest Four Weeks

Andrew Cates

**US monetary policy**
This first chart shows that Chair Powell’s cautious tone in the aftermath of this week’s FOMC meeting led markets to scale back expectations for further near-term easing. Fed funds futures for late 2025 through mid-2026 rose slightly, signalling that investors now expect a shallower and slower easing cycle than before. While the rate cut itself confirmed the Fed’s gradual pivot toward easier policy, markets interpreted Powell’s remarks as suggesting that a December move is not guaranteed and that the central bank remains wary of declaring victory on inflation too soon.

251030Z1.jpg

**The global business cycle**
The latest flash PMI surveys for October highlight a still-divergent global picture, with services-led resilience offsetting persistent manufacturing weakness. Activity remains strongest in India and the United States, both comfortably in expansion territory, while Germany has shown one of the clearest signs of improvement within the euro area after a long period of contraction. The broader euro area and UK readings point to modest but positive momentum, suggesting that growth is stabilising rather than accelerating. In contrast, France remains mired below the 50 threshold, signalling continued contraction, and Japan and Australia are treading water with only marginal gains.

251030Z2.jpg

**Consumer confidence in the US and Europe** 
Consumer confidence trends have diverged across major economies in 2025. In the UK, sentiment has improved gradually, supported by easing inflation and lower interest rates. In the euro area, confidence has stabilised after a prolonged downturn, though households remain wary. By contrast, US confidence has slipped further, probably reflecting a softening labour market, slowing wage growth, and heightened concern about job security. Overall, global consumer sentiment remains fragile and uneven, suggesting that household spending could stay subdued even if price pressures recede and monetary policy becomes more accommodative.

251030Z3.jpg

**Credit conditions in the euro area** 
The latest data on Euro Area M3 growth underline that monetary conditions remain mildly restrictive, even after the ECB’s recent rate reductions. Money growth has decelerated sharply over the past year, with only a limited contribution from private-sector credit and little net support from lending to government. The ECB’s Q4 Bank Lending Survey, released this week, suggests that while financing conditions are beginning to ease, credit dynamics remain weak. Banks reported a further net tightening of credit standards for firms, reflecting continued risk aversion, even as loan demand from businesses and households picked up modestly thanks to lower interest rates and improving sentiment.

251030Z4.jpg

**The UK manufacturing sector**
Turning to the UK, the latest CBI Industrial Trends Survey offers little sign of improvement in manufacturing conditions. The balance of firms reporting excess stocks of finished goods has fallen further into negative territory, consistent with efforts to run down inventories amid weak demand and high uncertainty. And on that score, the share of firms citing uncertainty about demand over the next year as a constraint on capital expenditure has shifted up, highlighting persistent caution in investment planning. Together, these indicators point to a sector still struggling to regain momentum after a protracted slowdown—one where firms are prioritising cost control and liquidity preservation over expansion, despite an easing in headline inflation and gradual monetary policy support.

251030Z5.jpg

**Traded goods price inflation**
The Drewry Container Index, which tracks global shipping costs for a standard 40-foot container, has fallen back in recent months from the elevated levels seen in 2024, reflecting softer global trade volumes and a partial unwinding of last year’s supply-chain pressures. Even so, concerns have re-emerged that new US tariff measures and associated logistical bottlenecks could push freight rates and producer price inflation (PPI) higher in the coming months. The final chart below illustrates how closely traded goods price inflation, represented by Haver’s aggregation of PPI inflation for advanced economies, has tended to move with swings in container shipping costs. While traded goods inflation remains subdued for now, any renewed disruptions to global shipping routes or tariff-driven frictions could quickly feed through to higher input costs—especially in manufacturing sectors reliant on long and complex supply chains.

251030Z6.jpg

Global equity markets are once again flirting with record highs, buoyed by renewed optimism that the global economy can achieve a soft landing—and by persistent enthusiasm over the potential productivity gains from AI-related investment. The Federal Reserve’s decision to cut rates by 25bps this week—its second this autumn—initially reinforced expectations that global monetary policy is shifting toward a more accommodative stance. However, Chair Powell’s reminder that a further cut in December was “not inevitable” tempered that optimism and was met with some disappointment in financial markets (chart 1). Even so, the broader tone remains constructive, though it contrasts with a still-fragile macro environment. Renewed conflict in Gaza, the ongoing US government shutdown, and intensifying trade tensions have kept risk sentiment uneven and underscored the fragility of the recovery. The latest flash PMIs (chart 2) show modest global expansion led by services, while manufacturing continues to struggle. Consumer confidence (chart 3) tells a similar story: sentiment has weakened in the US as the labour market softens, stabilised in the euro area, and improved slightly in the UK. In the euro area, sluggish money and credit growth (chart 4) and the ECB’s latest bank-lending survey confirm that financial conditions remain mildly restrictive despite recent rate cuts. The UK CBI Industrial Trends Survey (chart 5) points to manufacturers reducing inventories and deferring investment plans amid demand uncertainty. Externally, the Drewry Container Index (chart 6) has fallen back from 2024’s elevated levels, signalling easing supply-chain pressures and subdued traded-goods inflation—though tariff realignments remain a potential source of friction.

<iframe data-testid="embed-iframe" style="border-radius:12px" src="https://open.spotify.com/embed/episode/1qTfb8cqkuic21S0HPE4Wt?utm_source=generator" width="100%" height="152" frameBorder="0" allowfullscreen="" allow="autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; fullscreen; picture-in-picture" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Economy in Brief: 2003

Jump to: