Louise Curley

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040907d.jpg" width="353">
Industrial production in Germany rose more in July than had been expected. The consensus had expected a rise in German industrial production after the 1.48% decline in June, but the extent of the rise was expected to be less than 1%. In fact the index rose 1.60% and is now at the highest level since February, 2001. The manufacturing and mining index rose 1.77%. The output of capital goods rose 1.99%, that of consumer durable, 6.76% and that of consumer nondurable, 1.13%. The first chart shows the output of capital goods and consumer goods. Capital goods output has been strong since mid 2003, while that of consumer goods has, at best, stabilized It is not apparent from the industrial production data to what extent the rise in production was due to domestic or foreign demand.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040907c.jpg" width="353"> 
Some indication of the source of demand can be seen in the New Orders data, which include foreign and domestic new orders. Domestic new orders rose 1.05% in July from June and were 3.99% above July 2003. Foreign new orders rose 5.18% in July and were 11.35% above July 2003. The second chart showing foreign and domestic new orders suggests that foreign demand is still the major factor in the rise in German industrial production, but domestic demand is beginning to show a slight improvement.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">2000=100</th>
<th scope="col">Jul 04</th>
<th scope="col">Jun 04</th>
<th scope="col">Jul 03</th>
<th scope="col">M/M %</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y %</th>
<th scope="col">2003&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">&nbsp; 2002&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">&nbsp; 2001&nbsp;</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Industrial Production</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td></td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Total</td>
<td>101.4</td>
<td>99.8</td>
<td>99.2</td>
<td>1.60</td>
<td>2.22</td>
<td>98.4&nbsp;</td>
<td>98.3</td>
<td>99.5</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Manufacturing and Mining</td>
<td>103.7</td>
<td>101.9</td>
<td>100.4</td>
<td>1.77</td>
<td>3.29</td>
<td>99.5&nbsp;</td>
<td>99.3</td>
<td>100.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Capital Goods</td>
<td>107.5</td>
<td>105.4</td>
<td>103.0</td>
<td>1.99</td>
<td>4.37</td>
<td>102.0&nbsp;</td>
<td>101.1</td>
<td>102.4</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Consumer Durable Goods</td>
<td>&nbsp; 94.8</td>
<td>88.8</td>
<td>92.4</td>
<td>6.76</td>
<td>2.60</td>
<td>87.1&nbsp;</td>
<td>92.0</td>
<td>100.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Consumer Non Durable Goods</td>
<td>98.7</td>
<td>97.6</td>
<td>98.3</td>
<td>1.13</td>
<td>0.41</td>
<td>&nbsp;97.4</td>
<td>98.2</td>
<td>98.8</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">New Orders (2000 Prices)</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td></td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Total</td>
<td>104.1</td>
<td>101.1</td>
<td>96.9</td>
<td>2.97</td>
<td>7.43</td>
<td>97.8&nbsp;</td>
<td>97.2</td>
<td>97.4</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Domestic</td>
<td>96.4</td>
<td>95.4</td>
<td>92.7</td>
<td>1.05</td>
<td>3.99</td>
<td>93.4&nbsp;</td>
<td>93.5</td>
<td>96.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Foreign</td>
<td>113.8</td>
<td>108.2</td>
<td>102.2</td>
<td>5.18</td>
<td>11.35</td>
<td>103.3</td>
<td>101.9</td>
<td>98.4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Industrial production in Germany rose more in July than had been expected. The consensus had expected a rise in German industrial production after the 1.48% decline in June, but the extent of the rise was expected to be less than 1%. [...]

German Industrial Production and New Orders Rise in July

Tom Moeller

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040907b.jpg" width="353">
Mass layoffs in the US as reported to the Bureau of Labor Statistics jumped 52% in July from an elevated June level which rose 40% from May. The increases reversed all of improvement which had occurred through May.
These mass layoffs generated 253,929 initial claims for unemployment insurance, up 12.1% y/y.
Since the series inception in 1995 there has been a (negative) 46% correlation between the number of initial claims generated by mass layoffs and the one month change in non-farm payrolls.
The Mass Layoff Statistics (MLS) program collects reports on mass layoff actions that result in workers being separated from their jobs. Monthly mass layoff numbers are from establishments which have at least 50 initial claims for unemployment insurance (UI) filed against them during a 5-week period. Extended mass layoff numbers (issued quarterly) are from a subset of such establishments--where private sector non-farm employers indicate that 50 or more workers were separated from their jobs for at least 31 days.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@EF/@EF10/@EF1001/@EF1001.HTM">Mass Layoffs</a></th>
<th scope="col">July</th>
<th scope="col">June</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Number of Events: All Industries</td>
<td>2,094</td>
<td>1,379</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
<td>18,963</td>
<td>20,277</td>
<td>21,467</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Mass layoffs in the US as reported to the Bureau of Labor Statistics jumped 52% in July from an elevated June level which rose 40% from May. The increases reversed all of improvement which had occurred through May. These mass layoffs [...]

Mass Layoffs Up

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040907a.jpg" width="353">
The Job Openings &amp; Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) from the Bureau of Labor Statistics suggests US job creation has picked up, albeit moderately. The hires rate rose to 3.3% in June versus a monthly low of 3.0% last Spring and 3.1% during all of last year. The latest hires rate is down from the March high of 3.5% but it equals the rate averaged so far this year.
This year&#39;s improvement in the hires rate has been paced by job growth in the manufacturing and construction industries.
The survey dates only to December 2000 but has since followed closely the movement in nonfarm payrolls.
The job openings rate also is up this year versus last but it has been stuck at 2.3% since December.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@EB/@EB14/@EB14.HTM">JOLTS</a> (Job Openings &amp; Labor Turnover Survey)</th>
<th scope="col">June</th>
<th scope="col">May</th>
<th scope="col">June &#39;03</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Job Openings Rate: Total</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
<td>2.2%</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Hires Rate: Total</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>3.2%</td>
<td>3.1%</td>
<td>3.1%</td>
<td>3.2%</td>
<td>3.5%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

The Job Openings & Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) from the Bureau of Labor Statistics suggests US job creation has picked up, albeit moderately. The hires rate rose to 3.3% in June versus a monthly low of 3.0% last Spring and 3.1% [...]

JOLTS Indicates Improved Hiring in the US

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040907a.jpg" width="353">
The Job Openings &amp; Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) from the Bureau of Labor Statistics suggests US job creation has picked up, albeit moderately. The hires rate rose to 3.3% in June versus a monthly low of 3.0% last Spring and 3.1% during all of last year. The latest hires rate is down from the March high of 3.5% but it equals the rate averaged so far this year.
This year&#39;s improvement in the hires rate has been paced by job growth in the manufacturing and construction industries.
The survey dates only to December 2000 but has since followed closely the movement in nonfarm payrolls.
The job openings rate also is up this year versus last but it has been stuck at 2.3% since December.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@EB/@EB14/@EB14.HTM">JOLTS</a> (Job Openings &amp; Labor Turnover Survey)</th>
<th scope="col">June</th>
<th scope="col">May</th>
<th scope="col">June &#39;03</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Job Openings Rate: Total</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
<td>2.2%</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Hires Rate: Total</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>3.2%</td>
<td>3.1%</td>
<td>3.1%</td>
<td>3.2%</td>
<td>3.5%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Mass Layoffs Up 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom Moeller</a> September 7, 2004


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040907b.jpg" width="353">
Mass layoffs in the US as reported to the Bureau of Labor Statistics jumped 52% in July from an elevated June level which rose 40% from May. The increases reversed all of improvement which had occurred through May.
These mass layoffs generated 253,929 initial claims for unemployment insurance, up 12.1% y/y.
Since the series inception in 1995 there has been a (negative) 46% correlation between the number of initial claims generated by mass layoffs and the one month change in non-farm payrolls.
The Mass Layoff Statistics (MLS) program collects reports on mass layoff actions that result in workers being separated from their jobs. Monthly mass layoff numbers are from establishments which have at least 50 initial claims for unemployment insurance (UI) filed against them during a 5-week period. Extended mass layoff numbers (issued quarterly) are from a subset of such establishments--where private sector non-farm employers indicate that 50 or more workers were separated from their jobs for at least 31 days.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@EF/@EF10/@EF1001/@EF1001.HTM">Mass Layoffs</a></th>
<th scope="col">July</th>
<th scope="col">June</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Number of Events: All Industries</td>
<td>2,094</td>
<td>1,379</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
<td>18,963</td>
<td>20,277</td>
<td>21,467</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Carol Stone, CBE

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040903c.jpg" width="353">
The Euro-Zone Purchasing Managers Index for the service industries edged down in August to 54.47 from 55.31 in July. A narrow range from 54.40 to 55.76 has prevailed for six months now, tracing a steady moderate growth path for service sector activity. These international PMI surveys are conducted by NTC-Research for Reuters, Inc.
Most individual countries have also seen minimal swings in these service industry gauges. That in Germany, a few points lower than most, has crept higher the last few months. In Italy, the opposite is true: its index was over 58 in June, but has slowed to 56.5 in August. Components for the Euro-Zone Total show that employment is picking up while new orders are showing a bit less growth. Expectations have been virtually unchanged over the summer months. Input prices, as seen in the first graph, continue to move ahead.
NTC-Research compiles purchasing manager indexes for the Euro-Zone and other countries for the manufacturing, construction and service sectors of each economy. The firm recently introduced a set of &quot;GDP Indicators&quot; which combines these three sectoral indexes into a weighted average of the three diffusion indexes. NTC analysts then use regression models to scale the index to GDP growth rates.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040903d.jpg" width="353"> 
For the Euro-Zone, the index eased too in August, although it stands several percentage points above year-ago levels. For assessing year-to-year growth prospects, the NTC PMI-based indicator&#39;s translation to year-to-year growth aligns fairly well with GDP performance and has a high correlation ratio of 93%. The indicator level runs a 79% correlation with quarterly changes in Euro-Zone GDP. The recent moves in the indicator suggest a further gain in Euro-Zone GDP of 0.5 to 0.6% this quarter and year-on-year expansion of about 2-1/4%, that is, at least maintaining its recent growth rates.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">Purchasing Managers Index Percent (&gt;50 = expansion;&nbsp; &lt;50 = contraction)</th>
<th scope="col">Aug 2004</th>
<th scope="col">July 2004</th>
<th scope="col">June 2004</th>
<th scope="col">Aug 2003</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Services:</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Euro Zone Total</td>
<td>54.47</td>
<td>55.31</td>
<td>55.31</td>
<td>51.99</td>
<td>51.36</td>
<td>51.58</td>
<td>51.63</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Germany</td>
<td>53.54</td>
<td>53.87</td>
<td>52.30</td>
<td>51.78</td>
<td>48.49</td>
<td>48.62</td>
<td>48.87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">United Kingdom</td>
<td>56.91</td>
<td>56.22</td>
<td>56.77</td>
<td>57.00</td>
<td>54.84</td>
<td>54.37</td>
<td>51.41</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">GDP Indicator: </td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Euro-Zone Total</td>
<td>54.5</td>
<td>55.5</td>
<td>55.0</td>
<td>50.8</td>
<td>50.6</td>
<td>51.3</td>
<td>50.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Year/Year % Change</td>
<td>2.2</td>
<td>2.2</td>
<td>2.3</td>
<td>0.4</td>
<td>0.8</td>
<td>1.0</td>
<td>1.5</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Actual GDP Growth, Year/Year</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>0.5</td>
<td>0.9</td>
<td>1.6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

The Euro-Zone Purchasing Managers Index for the service industries edged down in August to 54.47 from 55.31 in July. A narrow range from 54.40 to 55.76 has prevailed for six months now, tracing a steady moderate growth path for [...]

Euro-Zone Services Activity Maintains Steady Growth

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040903b.jpg" width="353">
Nonfarm payrolls grew 144,000 last month following upwardly revised gains in both July &amp; June which averaged 84,500 each month. Consensus expectations had been for a 150,000 job gain in August.
The fall in the unemployment rate to 5.4% from the separate household survey continued to suggest moderate labor market improvement. Employment growth eased to 21,000 (1.4% y/y) following a 629,000 rise the prior month and the labor force fell 152,000 (+0.7% y/y). The labor force participation rate slipped back to 66.0% from 66.2% in July.
Hiring in private service producing industries recovered modestly last month with an 84,000 (1.7% y/y) gain versus an upwardly revised 45,000 July rise, however, these gains are a fraction of the growth during the prior several months. Hiring in the financial sector did recover 18,000 m/m (0.8% y/y), but jobs in information services fell 10,000 (-0.3% y/y) and another 11,300 (+0.8% y/y) retailing jobs were lost. Hiring in professional &amp; business services grew 32,000 (3.4% y/y) and temporary help services jobs rose 9,800 (8.9% y/y).
Factory sector payrolls grew 22,000 (0.1% y/y) following a downwardly revised gain in July. Construction sector hiring grew 15,000 (2.8% y/y).
The breadth of increase amongst private non-farm payrolls confirmed modest job growth at 54.5% versus an upwardly revised 54.9 in July. The three month diffusion index of hiring fell to 57.9 versus a high of 74.5 in May.
The index of aggregate hours worked (employment times hours worked) grew 0.2% following an upwardly revised 0.7% July rise. The index so far in the third quarter is 2.8% (AR) above 2Q which rose a revised 2.2% (AR) versus 1Q.
Average hourly earnings rose 0.3% (2.3% y/y) following an upwardly revised 0.4% July gain.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@EB/@EB01/@EB01.HTM">Employment</a></th>
<th scope="col">Aug</th>
<th scope="col">July</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Payroll Employment</td>
<td>144,000</td>
<td>73,000</td>
<td>1.3%</td>
<td>-0.3%</td>
<td>-1.1%</td>
<td>0.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Manufacturing</td>
<td>22,000</td>
<td>6,000</td>
<td>0.1%</td>
<td>-4.8%</td>
<td>-7.2%</td>
<td>-4.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Average Weekly Hours</td>
<td>33.8</td>
<td>33.8</td>
<td>33.6</td>
<td>33.7</td>
<td>33.8</td>
<td>34.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Average Hourly Earnings</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
<td>2.9%</td>
<td>3.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Unemployment Rate</td>
<td>5.4%</td>
<td>5.5%</td>
<td>6.1%</td>
<td>6.0%</td>
<td>5.8%</td>
<td>4.8%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Nonfarm payrolls grew 144,000 last month following upwardly revised gains in both July & June which averaged 84,500 each month. Consensus expectations had been for a 150,000 job gain in August. The fall in the unemployment rate to [...]

U.S. Job Growth Recovered Some, Unemployment Rate Fell

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>

 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040903a.jpg" width="353">
The Business Activity Index for the non-manufacturing sector from the Institute for Supply Management slipped to 58.2 in August from 64.9 in July. Consensus expectations had been for a more moderate decline to 63.0.
Since the series&#39; inception in 1997 there has been a 60% correlation between the Business Activity Index and the q/q change in GDP services plus construction.
Despite the decline in the Business Index, the employment index recovered 2.5 points of the sharp 7.4 point July drop. Higher employment was reported by the same 18% of firms as in July. Since the series&#39; inception in 1997 there has been a 61% correlation between the level of the ISM non-manufacturing employment index and the m/m change in payroll employment in the service producing plus the construction industries.
The new orders index slipped to 58.6 from the record high of 66.4 in July.
Business Activity Index for the non-manufacturing sector reflects a question separate from the subgroups mentioned above. In contrast, the NAPM manufacturing sector composite index is a weighted average five components.
The seasonally adjusted prices index fell to 70.0 versus 73.1 in July and the record high of 74.6 sin June.
ISM surveys more than 370 purchasing managers in more than 62 industries including construction, law firms, hospitals, government and retailers. The non-manufacturing survey dates only to July 1997, therefore its seasonal adjustment should be viewed tentatively. 

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@EF/@EF03/@EF03.HTM">ISM Nonmanufacturing Survey</a></th>
<th scope="col">Aug</th>
<th scope="col">July</th>
<th scope="col">Aug &#39;03</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Business Activity Index</td>
<td>58.2</td>
<td>64.8</td>
<td>63.8</td>
<td>58.1</td>
<td>55.1</td>
<td>48.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Prices Index</td>
<td>70.0</td>
<td>73.1</td>
<td>56.2</td>
<td>56.7</td>
<td>53.9</td>
<td>51.5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>


</html>

The Business Activity Index for the non-manufacturing sector from the Institute for Supply Management slipped to 58.2 in August from 64.9 in July. Consensus expectations had been for a more moderate decline to 63.0. Since the series' [...]

ISM Nonmanufacturing Index Slipped

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>

 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040903b.jpg" width="353">
Nonfarm payrolls grew 144,000 last month following upwardly revised gains in both July &amp; June which averaged 84,500 each month. Consensus expectations had been for a 150,000 job gain in August.
The fall in the unemployment rate to 5.4% from the separate household survey continued to suggest moderate labor market improvement. Employment growth eased to 21,000 (1.4% y/y) following a 629,000 rise the prior month and the labor force fell 152,000 (+0.7% y/y). The labor force participation rate slipped back to 66.0% from 66.2% in July.
Hiring in private service producing industries recovered modestly last month with an 84,000 (1.7% y/y) gain versus an upwardly revised 45,000 July rise, however, these gains are a fraction of the growth during the prior several months. Hiring in the financial sector did recover 18,000 m/m (0.8% y/y), but jobs in information services fell 10,000 (-0.3% y/y) and another 11,300 (+0.8% y/y) retailing jobs were lost. Hiring in professional &amp; business services grew 32,000 (3.4% y/y) and temporary help services jobs rose 9,800 (8.9% y/y).
Factory sector payrolls grew 22,000 (0.1% y/y) following a downwardly revised gain in July. Construction sector hiring grew 15,000 (2.8% y/y).
The breadth of increase amongst private non-farm payrolls confirmed modest job growth at 54.5% versus an upwardly revised 54.9 in July. The three month diffusion index of hiring fell to 57.9 versus a high of 74.5 in May.
The index of aggregate hours worked (employment times hours worked) grew 0.2% following an upwardly revised 0.7% July rise. The index so far in the third quarter is 2.8% (AR) above 2Q which rose a revised 2.2% (AR) versus 1Q.
Average hourly earnings rose 0.3% (2.3% y/y) following an upwardly revised 0.4% July gain.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@EB/@EB01/@EB01.HTM">Employment</a></th>
<th scope="col">Aug</th>
<th scope="col">July</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Payroll Employment</td>
<td>144,000</td>
<td>73,000</td>
<td>1.3%</td>
<td>-0.3%</td>
<td>-1.1%</td>
<td>0.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Manufacturing</td>
<td>22,000</td>
<td>6,000</td>
<td>0.1%</td>
<td>-4.8%</td>
<td>-7.2%</td>
<td>-4.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Average Weekly Hours</td>
<td>33.8</td>
<td>33.8</td>
<td>33.6</td>
<td>33.7</td>
<td>33.8</td>
<td>34.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Average Hourly Earnings</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
<td>2.9%</td>
<td>3.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Unemployment Rate</td>
<td>5.4%</td>
<td>5.5%</td>
<td>6.1%</td>
<td>6.0%</td>
<td>5.8%</td>
<td>4.8%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
ISM Nonmanufacturing Index Slipped 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom Moeller</a> September 3, 2004


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040903a.jpg" width="353">
The Business Activity Index for the non-manufacturing sector from the Institute for Supply Management slipped to 58.2 in August from 64.9 in July. Consensus expectations had been for a more moderate decline to 63.0.
Since the series&#39; inception in 1997 there has been a 60% correlation between the Business Activity Index and the q/q change in GDP services plus construction.
Despite the decline in the Business Index, the employment index recovered 2.5 points of the sharp 7.4 point July drop. Higher employment was reported by the same 18% of firms as in July. Since the series&#39; inception in 1997 there has been a 61% correlation between the level of the ISM non-manufacturing employment index and the m/m change in payroll employment in the service producing plus the construction industries.
The new orders index slipped to 58.6 from the record high of 66.4 in July.
Business Activity Index for the non-manufacturing sector reflects a question separate from the subgroups mentioned above. In contrast, the NAPM manufacturing sector composite index is a weighted average five components.
The seasonally adjusted prices index fell to 70.0 versus 73.1 in July and the record high of 74.6 sin June.
ISM surveys more than 370 purchasing managers in more than 62 industries including construction, law firms, hospitals, government and retailers. The non-manufacturing survey dates only to July 1997, therefore its seasonal adjustment should be viewed tentatively. 

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@EF/@EF03/@EF03.HTM">ISM Nonmanufacturing Survey</a></th>
<th scope="col">Aug</th>
<th scope="col">July</th>
<th scope="col">Aug &#39;03</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Business Activity Index</td>
<td>58.2</td>
<td>64.8</td>
<td>63.8</td>
<td>58.1</td>
<td>55.1</td>
<td>48.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Prices Index</td>
<td>70.0</td>
<td>73.1</td>
<td>56.2</td>
<td>56.7</td>
<td>53.9</td>
<td>51.5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>


</html>

Reaccelerating goods price inflation along with sticky services inflation clouds the outlook

Falling oil prices aren't pulling down inflation expectations, pointing to a boost from increased tariffs

Equity market exuberance outpacing macroeconomic data

Apart from Japan, Blue Chip forecasters expect further sizable monetary easing

US production rebounded in Q2, but demand continued to slow

US leader, Germany trailer for real GDP growth over past 3 years

Negative US inflation surprises leading G10 down

Deflation continues in China

Incoming data surprising on downside in US; positive surprises elsewhere

FOMC expects more inflation and less growth than in March

With escalation of Israel/Iran conflict, geopolitical risk has recently surged while US trade policy uncertainty has ebbed

Renewed supply chain pressures point to a rebound in global inflation ahead

Apart from Japan, Blue Chip forecasters look for further significant monetary policy easing

Apart from the US, productivity is moribund

Financial market concerns ebb even though policy uncertainty continues to soar

US tariff revenues nearly doubled in April

Even with expected tariff-induced increases in inflation, BCFF forecasters look for a more aggressive round of monetary easing

USD/EUR exchange rate uncoupling from interest rate differential

Widespread downgrading of 2025 GDP outlook

Trade and fiscal policy uncertainty has exploded with the new administration

Much lower US electricity costs gives it a competitive advantage

Wage growth slowing in the US and Euro area; elevated and sticky in the UK

Stagflation-lite: Blue Chip forecasts below-trend growth and elevated inflation

US policy gyrations boosting policy uncertainty worldwide

Expected tariff hikes have boosted inflation expectations

Our global data offering is unparalleled in terms of coverage, quality, and organization. We offer 290+ databases from 2500 government and private sources, a wealth of key survey and forecast data covering the world’s economies, and a robust offering of archive databases that drive machine learning for big data applications.

Optimized for precision analytics, our data is seamlessly integrated with Microsoft Office and all leading statistical packages through our DLX® software and platform independent HaverView™ website. We further offer direct database feeds, client server or cloud-based delivery, and RESTful API.


Privacy Policy

Disclaimer

Contact us

A premier time series data platform for the global strategy, research, and quant communities. 

London

Singapore

Tokyo

New York

Economy in Brief

Viewpoints

Contact Us

Our Data

Our Products

What We Do

Our Authors

About Us

Data News

Resources

Release Calendars

Training Center

Webinars

Newsletters

Download Software

For Clients

Live Updates

250829A1.jpg

250829B1.jpg

The **PCE chain price index** increased 0.2% (2.6% y/y) after rising an unrevised 0.3% in June and an unrevised 0.2% in May. The y/y gain steadied at 2.6%. It was increased from 2.2% y/y in April. Energy prices fell 1.1% (-2.7% y/y) after rising 0.9%, while food & beverage prices eased 0.1% (+1.9% y/y) following a 0.3% rise. The price index excluding food & energy rose a steady 0.3%, after two straight 0.2% increases. The y/y gain edged up to 2.9% last month from 2.8% in June. It was increased from a low of 2.6% in April.

Durable goods prices eased 0.1% (+1.1% y/y) in July, after rising 0.5% in June. Home furnishings & appliance prices edged 0.1% higher (2.5% y/y), after increasing 1.3%. Recreational goods & vehicle costs declined 0.9% (-0.3% y/y) and reversed the 0.9% June strengthening. Motor vehicle & parts prices rose 0.2% (1.6% y/y), after a 0.4% June decline.

Prices of nondurable goods eased 0.1% (+0.2% y/y) last month after rising 0.4% in June. Clothing prices held steady both m/m and y/y after rising 0.3% in June. Food & beverage prices eased 0.1% (+1.9% y/y), following a 0.4% June increase. Gasoline & other energy prices fell 1.7% (-9.6% y/y), after rising 0.9% in June.

Services prices in July rose 0.3% (3.6% y/y), after four straight 0.2% increases. Housing & utility prices rose 0.2% (4.3% y/y), after two consecutive 0.3% increases, and services prices excluding energy & healthcare gained 0.4% (3.7% y/y) after two 0.2% gains. Healthcare prices rose 0.2% (2.7% y/y), after rising 0.4%. The cost of financial services & insurance jumped 1.2% (5.5% y/y) after rising 0.4% in June. Recreation services costs rose 0.3% (3.2% y/y) after rising 0.1%. Transportation prices gained 0.2% (4.4% y/y), following a 0.1% rise, while hotel & restaurant prices improved 0.1% (2.8% y/y) after a slight June decline.

**Personal consumption expenditures (PCE)** rose 0.5% (4.7% y/y) last month after increasing 0.4% in June, revised from 0.3%, after holding steady in May. The July rise matched expectations in the Action Economics Forecast Survey. When adjusted for price changes, PCE improved 0.3% in July (2.1% y/y) after rising 0.1% in June.

Real spending on durable goods increased 2.0% (3.2% y/y) in July, after falling for three straight months. Real spending on motor vehicles jumped 4.5% (3.5% y/y), after falling sharply in both June and May. Real outlays on furnishings & appliances improved 0.2% (0.9% y/y), after falling in each of the prior month. Real spending on recreational goods & vehicles increased 1.5% (4.9% y/y) last month, after falling 0.4% in June. Spending on “other” durable goods improved 0.4% (2.6% y/y) after rising 0.2% in June.

Nondurable goods spending in real terms rose 0.3% (2.7% y/y) in July after gaining 0.6% in June. Real clothing & footwear purchases rose 0.6% (4.9% y/y) last month, following a 0.5% rise during June. Real food & beverage purchases strengthened 0.7% (1.7% y/y) after rising 0.4%. Real outlays on gasoline & other energy products fell 1.3% (-1.5% y/y), after rising 1.5%. Real spending on “other” nondurable goods edged 0.1% higher (4.1% y/y) last month, following a 0.6% rise in June.

Real spending on services improved 0.1% (1.7% y/y) in July for the second straight month. Real spending on housing & utilities rose 0.1% (1.1% y/y) in July, for a second consecutive month, while real health care spending also rose 0.1% (3.9% y/y) after rising 0.2%. Real spending on food services & accommodations eased 0.2% (+1.7% y/y), after rising 0.4% in June. Real spending on financial services & insurance rose 0.2% (2.4% y/y) after increasing 0.4% in June. Real spending on transportation services rose 0.3% (-0.0% y/y) in July, after falling 0.6% in June. Recreation spending slipped 0.1% (+1.0% y/y), the same as in June. Spending on “other” services rose 0.3% (2.7% y/y) for the second straight month.

250829F1.jpg

250829G1.jpg

**Personal income** rose 0.4% last month (5.0% y/y) after increasing 0.3% in June. A 0.5% gain was expected. Wages & salaries moved 0.6% higher (5.3% y/y), following a 0.1% increase during June. Rental income increased 0.5% (4.0% y/y) in July, after falling for three straight months. Proprietors’ income improved 0.7% (2.3% y/y), after a minimal 0.1% increase. Income from assets rose 0.1% (1.4% y/y), after holding steady in June, and current transfer receipts were unchanged (8.3% y/y) following a 1.1% June increase.

Disposable personal income increased 0.4% (4.6% y/y) during July following a 0.3% June rise. After adjusting for price changes, disposable income improved 0.2% (2.0% y/y) after holding steady in June.

The personal saving rate held steady in July at 4.4%, after falling from 5.0% in April. It still stands well above low of 3.5% in December of last year. Personal saving fell 1.7% (+5.8% y/y) in July, after declining 0.9% in June.

The personal income and consumption figures are available in Haver’s **USECON** database with detail in the **USNA** database. The Action Economics forecasts are in **AS1REPNA**.

**Let’s Get On with It** from Fed Governor Christopher J. Waller is available [here](https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/waller20250828a.htm).

250829C1.jpg

250829D1.jpg

- Core price increase y/y matches highest since February.
- Real spending moderation centers on services.
- Real disposable income improves; personal savings rate steadies.

U.S. Core PCE Price Inflation Up in July; Real Spending Slows Y/Y 

Winnie Tapasanun

250829H.jpg

250829I.jpg

The advance estimate of the U.S. international trade deficit in goods widened to a larger-than-expected $103.57 billion in July after narrowing to $84.85 billion in June, data from the U.S. Census Bureau showed. The July reading, the second widening in the goods trade deficit in three months, was slightly smaller than a $103.92 billion shortfall in July 2024. A deficit of $90.2 billion for July had been expected by the Action Economics Forecast Survey. The deficit reached a record $161.95 billion in March. In Q2'25, the goods trade deficit narrowed to $266.96 billion, the smallest since Q4'23, after ballooning to a record $465.035 billion in Q1'25; the monthly deficit averaged $88.99 billion in Q2'25, down from a record $155.01 billion in Q1'25.

Total goods exports dipped 0.1% m/m (+3.0% y/y), the third consecutive monthly decline, to $177.97 billion in July, the lowest level since January, after a 0.7% decrease to $178.08 billion in June. April registered a record high of $190.08 billion. Exports were up 9.6% from a June 2023 low but down 2.1% from a July 2022 high. The m/m decline in exports in July reflected exports m/m drops of 2.4% (+16.3% y/y) in other goods, 0.9% (+5.1% y/y) in nonfood consumer goods excluding autos, and 0.8% (-1.2% y/y) in industrial supplies & materials. To the upside, exports for the following end-use categories rose m/m in July: automotive vehicles & parts (2.2%; -4.0% y/y), capital goods excluding autos (0.7%; 7.0% y/y), and foods, feeds & beverages (0.5%; 1.4% y/y).

Total goods imports rebounded 7.1% m/m (1.7% y/y), the first monthly increase since March, to a four-month-high $281.54 billion in July following a 4.6% drop to $262.94 billion in June. March registered a record high of $344.59 billion. Imports were up 11.9% from a June 2023 low but down 2.6% from a March 2022 high. The m/m rebound in imports in July reflected m/m rises in most imports end-use categories. These included a 25.4% surge (the first m/m increase and the largest since January; 4.9% y/y) in industrial supplies & materials as well as rises of 11.5% (23.5% y/y) in other goods, 4.8% (14.7% y/y) in capital goods excluding autos, 2.4% (4.9% y/y) in foods, feeds & beverages, and 2.1% (-12.2% y/y) in nonfood consumer goods excluding autos. In contrast, imports of automotive vehicles & parts, the only end-use category with a monthly decline in July, fell 3.2% (-14.1% y/y), the third m/m fall in four months, on top of a 3.6% June decrease.

The advance international trade data can be found in Haver's **USECON** database. The expectation figure is from the Action Economics Forecast Survey, which is in **AS1REPNA**.

- Deficit: $103.57 bil. in July, jumping 22.1% from June’s $84.85 bil.
- Exports -0.1%, down for the third straight month, led by a 2.4% decline in exports of other goods.
- Imports +7.1%, up for the first time since March, led by a 25.4% surge in imports of industrial supplies & materials.

U.S. Goods Trade Deficit Balloons in July; Largest Since March’s Record High

250828N8.jpg

250828C8.jpg

Real GDP grew 3.3% (SAAR) during the second quarter of 2025, revised from a 3.0% gain reported initially. The increase followed an unrevised 0.5% decline in Q1. A 3.1% rise had been expected in the Action Economics Forecast Survey. Growth during the last four quarters of 2.1% compared to 2.0% y/y in Q1, and remained below its most recent high of 3.2% in Q4 2023.

After-tax corporate profits without IVA & CCA adjustment increased 1.4% (7.0% y/y) last quarter after easing 0.8% in Q1. Before-tax earnings with IVA & CCA rose 1.7% (4.3% y/y) after falling 2.3% in Q1. Financial sector earnings rose 1.4% (15.3% y/y) after rising 2.3% in Q1. Nonfinancial corporate profits rose 2.2% (2.5% y/y) after falling 2.5% in Q1. Earnings from abroad eased 0.7% (-0.4% y/y) following a 7.3% Q1 decline.

Foreign trade balance improvement added 4.95 percentage points to growth last quarter after subtracting 4.61 percentage points in Q1. Imports fell 29.8% (+1.3% y/y) after surging 38.0% in Q1. Exports declined 1.3% (+2.0% y/y) after improving 0.4% in Q1. Inventories subtracted 3.29 percentage points from growth after adding 2.59 percentage point to Q1 growth.

Real final sales to domestic purchasers grew 1.6% (2.4% y/y), revised from 1.1%, in Q2 after rising 1.5% in Q1. Personal consumption expenditures rose 1.6% (2.4% y/y), revised from 1.4%, following a 0.5% gain. Durable goods spending rose 2.6% (4.6% y/y) after falling 3.7% in Q1. Motor vehicle purchases strengthened 11.7% (6.7% y/y) after declining 11.2% in Q1. Spending on home furnishings & appliances weakened 2.1% (+3.5% y/y) following a 1.5% rise. Recreational goods & vehicle outlays fell 3.5% (+4.3% y/y) last quarter after a 0.4% Q1 gain.

Nondurable goods outlays in constant dollars rose 2.3% (3.0% y/y) following 2.1% growth in Q1. Apparel spending increased 5.4% (4.8% y/y) following a 7.0% rise. Food & beverage buying gained 0.3% (1.5% y/y) after a 1.0% increase. Gasoline & fuel oil purchases weakened 1.4% (+0.9% y/y) after gaining 3.6% in Q1.

Real spending on services increased 1.2% (1.9% y/y) after a 0.6% gain. Outlays on housing & utilities eased 0.4% (+1.1% y/y) after rising 2.9% in Q1. Health care expenditures rose 4.2% (4.8% y/y) after a 3.1% increase. Transportation outlays declined 2.9% (-0.6% y/y) after a 1.4% rise, while recreation spending rose 3.6% (0.7% y/y) following a 5.1% decline. Restaurant & hotel expenditures increased 5.1% (1.9% y/y) after falling 1.8%. Financial services expenditures rose 1.9% (2.3% y/y) following a 0.1% Q1 increase.

Business fixed investment in constant dollars increased 5.7% last quarter (4.2% y/y), revised from 1.9%, following a 10.3% surge in Q1. Expenditures on structures declined 8.9% (-3.4% y/y), after falling 2.4% in Q1. Expenditures on producers’ durable equipment increased 7.4% (7.7% y/y), revised from 4.8%, after surging 23.7% in Q1. Outlays on information processing equipment rose 10.1% (20.1% y/y), revised from 5.5%, after soaring 72.8% during Q1. Industrial equipment investment rose 6.7% (4.0% y/y) after a 4.7% rise. Transportation equipment investment surged 20.4% (6.8% y/y) after a 6.9% gain. Intellectual property product spending rose 12.8% last quarter (5.2% y/y) following a 6.0% rise.

Residential structures investment in real terms declined a little-revised 4.7% (-1.3% y/y), the fourth decline in the last five quarters.

250828O8.jpg

250828P8.jpg

Government spending eased 0.2%, revised from up 0.5% in Q2 (+1.8% y/y) after a 0.6% decline. Federal government expenditures declined 4.7% (+0.7% y/y) after falling 4.6% in Q1. National defense expenditures increased 1.4% (3.0% y/y) after declining 7.1% in Q1. State & local government spending rose 2.6% (2.5% y/y) following a 2.0% rise.

The GDP chain price index rose an unrevised and expected 2.0% last quarter (2.5% y/y) after increasing 3.8% in Q1. The PCE chain price index increased 2.0% (2.4% y/y) following a 3.7% rise. The PCE price index excluding food and energy rose 2.5% (2.7% y/y) after increasing 3.5% in Q1. The business fixed investment price index edged 0.5% lower (+1.1% y/y) after a 0.4% rise. The residential price index rose 1.1% (2.6% y/y) after a 4.1% rise while the government price index increased 3.3% (3.1% y/y) following a 4.6% rise.

The GDP data can be found in Haver’s **USECON** and **USNA** databases. **USNA** contains virtually all of the Bureau of Economic Analysis detail in the national accounts. The Action Economics consensus estimates can be found in **AS1REPNA**.

250828Q8.jpg

250828S8.jpg

- Business investment strengthens & consumer spending firms.
- U.S. business earnings reverse Q1 decline.
- Increase in price index is unrevised, remaining roughly half of Q1’s gain.

U.S. GDP Q2’25 Growth Revised Up; Profits Improve

Sandy Batten

250828J2.jpg

250828K2.jpg

The Kansas City Fed manufacturing composite index was unchanged at 1 in August from July. This was the second consecutive month that the index has been positive, indicating the manufacturing in the KC Fed district continue to inch up in August. Prior to the positive reading in July, the index had been negative for 22 consecutive months. The index’s most recent high was 31 reached in both April 2021 and October 2021. The durable manufacturing sector was mostly flat in August, while nondurable manufacturing activity declined slightly driven by printing activities and paper and chemical manufacturing. 

The August survey was open for a six-day period from August 20-25, 2025 and included 103 responses from plants in Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, northern New Mexico, and western Missouri.

The ISM-adjusted index calculated by Haver Analytics rose to 51.1 (NSA) in August from 50.2 in July. This was the fifth reading above the critical 50 level that separates expansion from contraction in the past six months, a further indication of expanding manufacturing activity.

For the major component indexes, the production index was 0 in August, but this was up from -3 in July. The new orders index rose to 5 in August, its highest reading since May 2022, from 2 in July. The shipments index increased to 6 in August from 3 in July. The employment index was 0 in August, but this was up from -11 in July. Also, the average workweek index rebounded to 3 in August after having been in negative territory for the previous four months. Supplier delivery times were unchanged at 7 in August. The elevation of this index since April may indicate some incipient supply-chain disruptions from higher tariffs. In contrast, raw materials inventories fell to -7 in August from 8 in July.

On the inflation front, the prices paid for raw materials index remained elevated but fell to 43 in August from 47 in July and a local high of 51 in June. Forty-four percent of respondents reported an increase in raw materials prices in August, down from 48% in July and 53% in June, while only 4% reported a decrease, down from 5% in July and 6% in June. The prices received for finished products index increased to 21 in August from 18 in July. This index has fluctuated in a range between 17 and 21 for the past four months.

Expectations for future activity remained positive, with the composite index rising to 11 from 8, as firms anticipate an improvement in production and new orders. While expectations have been trending up over the past several months, they remain depressed relative to the recent high reading of 17 last December. Capital expenditures expectations remained in negative territory in August for the second consecutive month but edged up to -3 from -4 in July.

The series dates back to July 2001. The diffusion indexes are calculated as the percentage of total respondents reporting increases minus the percentage reporting declines. The composite index is an average of the production, new orders, employment, supplier delivery time, and raw materials inventory indexes. Data for the Kansas City Fed Survey can be found in Haver’s **SURVEYS** database.

250828L2.jpg

250828M2.jpg

- Index remained (though barely) in positive territory for the second consecutive month, indicating that manufacturing activity was inching up.
- Prior to last month, the index had been negative for 22 consecutive months.
- Positive readings across most key components.

FRB Kansas City Manufacturing Index Unchanged in August

250828F0.jpg

250828G0.jpg

The Pending Home Sales Index weakened 0.4% in July (+0.7% y/y) to 71.7 after falling an unrevised 0.8% in June and rising an unrevised 1.8% in May, according to the National Association of Realtors (NAR). The Index remained 42.7% below its most recent peak of 125.1 in October 2021. The index is a forward-looking measure of home sales based on contract signings.

The fall in pending home sales occurred as the average rate on a 30-year mortgage rose to 6.72% in July after holding steady m/m at 6.82% in June. These rates remained well above a low of 5.22% in August 2022 and more than double a record-low 2.68% in December 2020.

Pending home sales were mixed last month in the four major regions of the country. Sales in the Midwest declined 4.0% (+1.3% y/y) in July after easing 0.8% in June. Sales in the Northeast fell 0.6% both m/m and y/y, after holding steady in June. In the South, sales eased 0.1% (+1.8% y/y) following a 0.6% June decline, but sales in the West increased 3.7% (-1.9% y/y), reversing a 3.9% June drop.

The pending home sales index measures sales at the time the contract for the purchase of an existing home is signed, similar to the Census Bureau's new home sales data. In contrast, the National Association of Realtors' existing home sales data are recorded when the sale is closed, which is usually a couple of months after the sales contract has been signed. In developing the pending home sales index, the NAR found that the level of monthly sales contract activity leads the level of closed existing home sales by about two months.

The series dates back to 2001 and are available in Haver's **PREALTOR** database. Weekly mortgage interest rates from the Mortgage Bankers Association can be found in the **WEEKLY** database.

- Decline adds to June weakness.
- Regional changes are mixed.


Economy in Brief: 2004

Jump to:

German Industrial Production and New Orders Rise in July

Mass Layoffs Up

JOLTS Indicates Improved Hiring in the US

JOLTS Indicates Improved Hiring in the US

Euro-Zone Services Activity Maintains Steady Growth

U.S. Job Growth Recovered Some, Unemployment Rate Fell

ISM Nonmanufacturing Index Slipped

U.S. Job Growth Recovered Some, Unemployment Rate Fell