Tom Moeller

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html><head>
<style>
.odd{
background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081030a.jpg" align="left" border="0" height="265" width="353">
U.S. real GDP fell a modest 0.3% (AR)
last quarter after 2.8%
growth during 2Q. Consensus expectations had been for a decline at a
0.5% rate. The decline last quarter mirrored a 0.2% decline during the
fourth quarter of last year. The y/y rate of growth of 0.8% was the
weakest since the end of the 2001 recession.
Real final sales to domestic purchasers
were notably weak in
3Q as they posted a 1.8% (AR) decline. That was the largest quarterly
decline since the end of the 1990-91 recession. The year-to-year dip of
0.1%, while modest, was the first since 1991.<img src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081030b.jpg" align="right" border="0" height="265" width="353">
Real personal consumption declined at a
3.1% (0.0% y/y)
annual rate, reversing a 1.2% rise during 2Q. The 2Q gain presumably
was fueled by tax rebate checks but the lift seems to have been slight.
Spending on autos &amp; light trucks fell at a 25.6% (-14.7% y/y)
annual rate after declining at a 19.7% rate during 2Q. Spending on
furniture &amp; other household equipment fell at a 7.6% rate
(+2.7%
y/y) and the decline reversed roughly half of the 2Q increase. Spending
on apparel fell at an 11.0% rate (-0.4% y/y) and that reversed all of
the 2Q jump. Spending on consumer services also weakened to a 0.6%
growth rate. That about matched the 2Q rise but the y/y change of 1.3%
was the weakest since 1981. Growth in real PCE subtracted 2.3
percentage points from 3Q real GDP growth after a 0.9 point add during
2Q.
Residential construction fell again, last
quarter at a 19.1%
(-21.3% y/y) annual rate after a 13.3% rate of decline during 2Q. The
3Q drop subtracted 0.7 percentage points from GDP growth.
Growth in business fixed investment fell
for the first time
since fourth quarter, 2006. The 1.0% decline (+1.8% y/y) followed 2.5%
growth during 2Q, a 4.9% rise during 2007 and roughly 7.5% growth in
2006 and 2005. Equipment investment repeated its 2Q performance and
declined at a 5.5% rate (-2.6% y/y). Conversely, structures investment
was firm again and rose at a 7.9% annual rate (10.8% y/y).<img src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081030c.jpg" align="left" border="0" height="265" width="353">
An improved foreign trade deficit again
was the main source
of lift to GDP growth, though the 1.1 percentage point addition was
almost a third of that in 2Q. Exports grew at a slower 5.9% rate (6.9%
y/y), half that in 2Q. Growth in imports weakened with the slowdown in
overall economic growth. They fell at a 1.9% rate (-3.1% y/y).
Inventory accumulation added 0.6 percentage
points to GDP growth after three consecutive quarters of subtraction.
Spending by governments was strong again
and the 5.8% (3.1% y/y) rise was the quickest since early 2003.
The GDP chain price index surged at a 4.2%
annual rate. The
accelerated rate of increase owed to a 5.4% jump in the PCE price index
which was fueled by higher energy prices. Capital spending prices rose
at an accelerated 4.2% rate (2.2% y/y) while the residential investment
price deflator declined for the fourth straight quarter (-1.8% y/y).
Fed, Central Banks in Brazil, Mexico, Korea and
Singapore, Announce Swap Lines and the Fed's announcement
can be found <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20081029b.htm">here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead><tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@E7/@E701/@E701.HTM">Chained
2000$, % AR</a></th>
<th scope="col">3Q '08 (Advance)</th>
<th scope="col">2Q '08</th>
<th scope="col">3Q Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2007</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">GDP</td>
<td>-0.3</td>
<td>2.8</td>
<td>0.8</td>
<td>2.0</td>
<td>2.8</td>
<td>2.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Inventory
Effect</td>
<td>0.6</td>
<td>-1.5</td>
<td>-0.4</td>
<td>-0.4</td>
<td>0.0</td>
<td>-0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Final Sales</td>
<td>-0.8</td>
<td>4.4</td>
<td>1.3</td>
<td>2.4</td>
<td>2.8</td>
<td>3.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Foreign Trade Effect</td>
<td>1.1</td>
<td>2.9</td>
<td>1.7</td>
<td>0.6</td>
<td>0.2</td>
<td>0.0</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Domestic Final Demand</td>
<td>-1.8</td>
<td>1.3</td>
<td>-0.1</td>
<td>1.8</td>
<td>2.6</td>
<td>3.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Chained GDP Price Index</td>
<td>4.2</td>
<td>1.1</td>
<td>2.7</td>
<td>2.7</td>
<td>3.2</td>
<td>3.3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
U.S. Initial Claims for
Unemployment Insurance Stable But High 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom
Moeller</a> October 30, 2008


<img src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081030d.jpg" align="left" border="0" height="265" width="353">
Initial claims for jobless insurance were stable last week at
479,000, near the high for this cycle. The figure was about as
expected. The four-week moving average of initial claims fell slightly
to 475,500 (44.2% y/y), still just off the cycle high.
The largest increases in initial claims for the week ending
Oct. 18
were in Tennessee (+1,956), Oregon (+1,802), Indiana (+1,297), Virginia
(+898), and Florida (+543), while the largest decreases were in New
York (-6,080), Michigan (-5,894), Illinois (-3,795), Ohio (-2,923), and
Kentucky (-2,494).
Continuing claims for unemployment insurance during the week
of
October 18 fell 12,000 after a revised 7,000 increase during the prior
week, initially reported as a slight decline. The four-week average of
continuing claims rose further to this cycle's high of 3,709,500, the
highest level since early 2003. Continuing claims provide some
indication of workers' ability to find employment and they lag the
initial claims figures by one week.<img src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081030e.jpg" align="right" border="0" height="265" width="353">
The insured rate of unemployment was stable for the third week
at
2.8%. That was this cycle's high and the highest since mid-2003. The
high in that recessionary period was 3.0% reached in late June 2003.
What Exactly Is a Recession&#8212;and Are We in One? from
the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland can be found <a href="http://www.clevelandfed.org/research/trends/2008/1108/01ecoact.cfm">here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead><tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/WEEKLY/@W5/@W507/@W507.HTM">Unemployment
Insurance (000s)</a>&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">10/25/08</th>
<th scope="col">10/18/08</th>
<th scope="col">10/11/08</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2007</th>
<th scope="col">2006&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Initial Claims</td>
<td>478</td>
<td>&nbsp;479</td>
<td>463</td>
<td>44.3%</td>
<td>322</td>
<td>313</td>
<td>331</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Continuing Claims</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>3,715</td>
<td>3,727</td>
<td>43.0</td>
<td>2,552</td>
<td>2,459</td>
<td>2,662</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
EU Indices Are Scraping Low
Levels: It Will Get Worse&#8230; 
by <a href="/comment/Brusca.html">Robert
Brusca</a> October 30, 2008


<img src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081030f.jpg" align="left" border="0" height="265" width="353">
The news this month for the EU/EMU region is bad. The EU
reading is
in the bottom 10% of its range of value. The EMU reading is a bit
better, in the bottom 17% of its range. Both are quite weak. The drop
in the index is the largest since the data have been collected in 1991. All sectors made larger falls in Oct
compared to Sept. The main
EMU countries also saw large drops in their respective overall
sentiment indices.
By sector, services is relatively the hardest hit standing at
the
lowest point of its range since that survey began. But that only goes
back to October of 1996 instead of 1991 as for the other surveys. Still
this result parallels the sort of readings we have been getting in the
US with a very weak service sector checking in.
Is
this more than coincidence? You bet! This crisis is hitting
intrinsically domestic sectors harder like real estate and finance.
Typically banks populate every community; the same with real estate
businesses. These sectors are not like mining or autos or textiles that
may have a particular regional representation. The troubled sectors in
this cycle are spread everywhere and the troubled asset class &#8216;housing&#8217;
is everywhere, as well. It&#8217;s as true in Europe as in the US.INDUSTRY 
 

Europe&#8217;s industry reading at -18 (EMU) is only in the 32nd
percentile of its range (bottom third of its range) and so is weak but
not desperately weak. Germany and France carry percentile positions for
their respective readings in the high thirty percentiles while Spain&#8217;s
is at the 33rd percentile and the UK is at the 27Th
percentile; Italy is looking desperate at the 17Th
percentile. These are weak readings but the most troubling for Italy.
The components of the industry index show that the production
trend
is the weakest relative reading standing in the bottom 3% of its
historic range. Production
expectations are better but still weak in their 12th
percentile. For some reason Europeans think that a worse time lies
behind it not ahead of it. That explains a lot about the government
attitudes. Europe has been in and seem to remain in DENIAL. Order volumes are still relatively
firm in their 44th
range percentile; export orders are in about the same relative range
position and that is also where the expected selling price resides.
Contrarily workers are more exposed with employment expectations in the
bottom 16 percentile of their range. If worker readings are RIGHT then
the rest of the readings are too high.CONFIDENCE
By main countries confidence readings are all over the map
except
that they are limited being to all over intrinsically weak territory.
The EU&#8217;s UK reading is in the bottom 2.9% of its all-time range. Among
large EMU nations Spain is weakest posting the lowest confidence
reading ever. It is followed by France with a bottom 5 percentile
reading. Germany&#8217;s percentile reading at the 43% mark and is similar to
its industrial sector reading but at 37.5 Italy&#8217;s percentile reading is
way above its industry percentile. So, Italian consumer confidence is
more upbeat than it is for Italian industry.
As for the reason for this angst, ee find over all EMU
responses on
&#8216;time to buy&#8217; are at the very worst for making major purchases now or
in the next 12 months. The economic situation in the past 12-months is
rated as the worst ever but looking ahead for the next 12-months the
out look is &#8216;only&#8217; a bottom 13% ordeal. Respondents may want to rethink
that one. The financial situation for this past and this next 12-months
each rate in their respective 12th percentile.
In short the readings really are weak. Unemployment expectations are
&#8216;only up to the 58th percentile of their range &#8211;
elevated, but not by much.RETAIL
The retail readings across EU countries are weakest in the UK,
residing in their bottom 3 range percentile followed by Spain (bottom
13%), Germany (bottom 26%), France (bottom 43%), and Italy (63rd
percentile &#8211; still above its range midpoint). Retailers are not as
downbeat as consumers and that could spell some troubles for them and
for their inventories. Retail orders are put in the bottom 14% of their
range. The expected business situation is only a bottom 38% rating
similar to the present business situation. And maybe the retailers are
just putting up a brave front since their orders are so weak. They may
be planning for something even weaker than what they say they expect&#8230; SERVICES
Service sector reading span the gamut form bad to worst. The
UK and
Italy have the worst service sector readings ever. Spain&#8217;s reading is
in the bottom 6% of its range. German is a bottom 25% reading; for
France the reading is a bottom one-third of range reading. All of
theses are weak. For EMU the
overall reading is
the worst ever. The business climate is a bottom 7% affair, but
expected demand is worse in the bottom 2% of its range. Current demand
is rated as in only the 16th percentile. Current and expected
employment readings are in the 20th percentile
of their
respective ranges, and the reading is lower for expected unemployment.
Things will get worse. Maybe industry workers are better protected by
unions that service sector workers.CONSTRUCTION
The construction sector is the least impacted off all. For
overall sentiment, construction stands in the 49th
percentile of its range. Of course that implies a raw reading of -20.
One issue for construction it that its participants have considered it
sub-par all along. So now the outlook is being impacted construction
respondents are not looking for things to get that much worse. Spain is
an exception having had a boom its current reading; it is a bottom 19th
percentile reading. For the UK the residential property bubble busting
has helped to drag its reading to the 31st
percentile. France and Germany still carry mid range readings at or
above their expected range midpoints. Italy&#8217;s sector has a relatively
strong construction reading in the 60th
percentile.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <colgroup></colgroup>
<thead><tr>
<th colspan="12" scope="col"> EU
Sectors and Country level Overall Sentiment</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">EU</td>
<td>Oct 
08</td>
<td>Sep 
08</td>
<td>Aug 
08</td>
<td>Jul 
08</td>
<td>%tile</td>
<td>Rank</td>
<td>Max</td>
<td>Min</td>
<td>Range</td>
<td>Mean</td>
<td>R-SQ 
w/Overall</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstcol">Overall</td>
<td>77.5</td>
<td>84.9</td>
<td>86.7</td>
<td>88.8</td>
<td>9.8</td>
<td>209</td>
<td>116</td>
<td>73</td>
<td>43</td>
<td>99</td>
<td>1.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Industrial</td>
<td>-19</td>
<td>-13</td>
<td>-10</td>
<td>-7</td>
<td>23.5</td>
<td>204</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>-27</td>
<td>34</td>
<td>-7</td>
<td>0.86</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Consumer Confidence</td>
<td>-23</td>
<td>-19</td>
<td>-19</td>
<td>-20</td>
<td>13.8</td>
<td>205</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>-27</td>
<td>29</td>
<td>-11</td>
<td>0.83</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Retail</td>
<td>-16</td>
<td>-13</td>
<td>-14</td>
<td>-11</td>
<td>18.5</td>
<td>214</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>-21</td>
<td>27</td>
<td>-6</td>
<td>0.51</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Construction</td>
<td>-25</td>
<td>-20</td>
<td>-18</td>
<td>-17</td>
<td>37.8</td>
<td>150</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>-42</td>
<td>45</td>
<td>-17</td>
<td>0.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Services</td>
<td>-10</td>
<td>-4</td>
<td>-2</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0.0</td>
<td>145</td>
<td>32</td>
<td>-10</td>
<td>42</td>
<td>16</td>
<td>0.81</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;</td>
<td colspan="3">% m/m</td>
<td>
Oct 
08</td>
<td colspan="2">Based on Level</td>
<td colspan="4">Level</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">EMU</td>
<td>-8.1%</td>
<td>-1.1%</td>
<td>-1.1%</td>
<td>80.4</td>
<td>16.8</td>
<td>206</td>
<td>117</td>
<td>73</td>
<td>44</td>
<td>99</td>
<td>0.94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Germany</td>
<td>-5.1%</td>
<td>-1.4%</td>
<td>-2.7%</td>
<td>88.6</td>
<td>23.5</td>
<td>186</td>
<td>121</td>
<td>79</td>
<td>42</td>
<td>99</td>
<td>0.61</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">France</td>
<td>-7.0%</td>
<td>-0.6%</td>
<td>-0.1%</td>
<td>86.5</td>
<td>31.6</td>
<td>196</td>
<td>119</td>
<td>72</td>
<td>47</td>
<td>100</td>
<td>0.79</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Italy</td>
<td>-6.9%</td>
<td>0.6%</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
<td>82.1</td>
<td>21.6</td>
<td>206</td>
<td>121</td>
<td>71</td>
<td>50</td>
<td>99</td>
<td>0.78</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Spain</td>
<td>-5.0%</td>
<td>-2.0%</td>
<td>-4.3%</td>
<td>66.1</td>
<td>0.0</td>
<td>220</td>
<td>118</td>
<td>66</td>
<td>52</td>
<td>99</td>
<td>0.62</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Memo: UK</td>
<td>-7.5%</td>
<td>-5.2%</td>
<td>-6.1%</td>
<td>70.4</td>
<td>3.4</td>
<td>219</td>
<td>118</td>
<td>69</td>
<td>50</td>
<td>100</td>
<td>0.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="12" class="firstcol">Since 1990
except Services (Oct
1996) 247-Count; Services: 145-Count</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="12" class="firstcol">Sentiment
is an index, sector
readings are net balance diffusion measures.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body></html>

U.S. real GDP fell a modest 0.3% (AR) last quarter after 2.8% growth during 2Q. Consensus expectations had been for a decline at a 0.5% rate. The decline last quarter mirrored a 0.2% decline during the fourth quarter of last year. The [...]

U.S. 3Q'08 GDP Fell Modestly

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081029f.jpg" width="353">
The Federal Open Market Committee today cut the Federal funds rate, as expected, to 1.00% from 1.50%. The discount rate also was cut to 1.25%. The latest Fed funds rate was its lowest since 2004.
The Fed indicated three specific reasons for lowering interest rates today. 1) A slowdown in U.S. economic growth due to slower consumer spending and weaker business investment spending 2) Financial market turmoil and 3) an expectation for moderation in inflation due to lower energy and other commodity prices as well as slower economic growth.
Credit market conditions were expected by the Fed to improve due to interest rate cuts around the world, &quot;extraordinary liquidity measures&quot; and actions to strengthen financial systems.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081029g.jpg" width="353">
The decision was unanimous amongst FOMC voters.
For the complete text of the Fed&#39;s latest press release please follow this <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20081029a.htm">link</a>.
How Economic News Moves Markets from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York can be found <a href="http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/current_issues/ci14-6.pdf">here</a>. 

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">Current</th>
<th scope="col">Last</th>
<th scope="col">September</th>
<th scope="col">2007</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Federal Funds Rate, % (Target)</td>
<td>1.00</td>
<td>1.50</td>
<td>2.00</td>
<td>5.05</td>
<td>4.96</td>
<td>3.19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Discount Rate, %</td>
<td>1.25</td>
<td>1.75</td>
<td>2.25</td>
<td>5.86</td>
<td>5.96</td>
<td>4.19</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

The Federal Open Market Committee today cut the Federal funds rate, as expected, to 1.00% from 1.50%. The discount rate also was cut to 1.25%. The latest Fed funds rate was its lowest since 2004. The Fed indicated three specific [...]

FOMC Cut Funds Rate to 1.00%; The Lowest Since 2004

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081029d.jpg">
The total number of mortgage applications rose 28.5% last week and that recovered all of the prior period&#39;s decline, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. Nevertheless, the October average fell 20.0% from September and applications were two-thirds below their peak reached this past January.
Last week, applications for a mortgage to purchase a home made up most of the prior week&#39;s decline with an 8.5% rise. For October so far, however, purchase applications reversed most of the prior month&#39;s gain with a 13.3% decline. During the latest week purchase applications were down 43% from their 2005 peak.
During the last ten years there has been a 61% correlation between the y/y change in purchase applications and the change in new plus existing single family home sales. Figures covering sales of existing single-family home will be available this Friday while single-family home sales will be published early next week.
Applications to refinance a home mortgage recovered most of the prior week&#39;s decline with a 28.5% increase but applications in October overall remained 20% below September. During September, applications to refinance had risen 61.9% from August as 15-year mortgage rates fell briefly to 5.54%.<img align="right" border="0" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081029e.jpg">
The effective interest rate on a conventional 15-year mortgage slipped last week to 6.30% following an average of 6.01% last month. For a 30-year mortgage, rates slipped w/w to 6.48%. Interest rates on 15 and 30 year mortgages are closely correlated (&gt;90%) with the rate on 10-year Treasury securities. For an adjustable rate 1-Year mortgage the rate also slipped w/w to 6.95% after having averaged 6.70% last month.
During the last ten years there has been a (negative) 79% correlation between the level of applications for purchase and the effective interest rate on a 30-year mortgage.
The Mortgage Bankers Association surveys between 20 to 35 of the top lenders in the U.S. housing industry to derive its refinance, purchase and market indexes. The weekly survey covers roughly 50% of all U.S. residential mortgage applications processed each week by mortgage banks, commercial banks and thrifts. Visit the Mortgage Bankers Association site <a href="http://www.mbaa.org">here</a>.
The figures for weekly mortgage applications are available in Haver&#39;s SURVEYW database.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/SURVEYW/@S5/@S5.HTM">MBA Mortgage Applications (3/16/90=100)</a></th>
<th scope="col">10/24/08</th>
<th scope="col">10/17/08</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2007</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Total Market Index</td>
<td>476.7</td>
<td>408.1</td>
<td>-30.1%</td>
<td>652.6</td>
<td>584.2</td>
<td>708.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Purchase</td>
<td>303.1</td>
<td>279.3</td>
<td>-26.6%</td>
<td>424.9</td>
<td>406.9</td>
<td>470.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Refinancing</td>
<td>1,489.4</td>
<td>1,158.8</td>
<td>-33.8%</td>
<td>1,997.9</td>
<td>1,634.0</td>
<td>2,092.3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

The total number of mortgage applications rose 28.5% last week and that recovered all of the prior period's decline, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. Nevertheless, the October average fell 20.0% from September and [...]

U.S. Mortgage Applications Recovered Last Week; Off Two-Thirds From Peak

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081029b.jpg" width="353">
During September, new orders for durable goods ticked up 0.8% after falling 5.5% during August, a decline revised from the -4.5% figure reported initially. Though the September rise in orders beat Consensus expectations for a 1.0% decline, there where few, if any, areas of strength. The gain mostly reflected a 21.8% (-16.6% y/y) jump in new orders for aircraft &amp; parts that offset most of a decline during August. (Nondefense aircraft orders rose 29.7% (-34.1% y/y).
Highlighting the weakness in durable goods orders last month was a 1.1% decline in new orders less the transportation sector altogether. That followed a 4.1% drop during August, initially reported at down 3.0%. The September decline about matched Consensus expectations but during the last three months, orders less the transportation sector fell at a 19.0% annual rate.
The rise in aircraft orders did lift overall orders for nondefense capital goods by 0.8%, but that followed a little-revised 7.7% plunge during August. Without aircraft, nondefense capital goods orders fell 1.4% after 2.2% drop during August. These declines lowered the three-month growth rate to -12.4%, the worst since early last year. During the last ten years there has been an 80% correlation between the y/y gain in nondefense capital goods orders and the rise in equipment &amp; software spending in the GDP accounts. The correlation of the GDP figure with capital goods shipments is, as one would expect, a larger 92%.
The industry detail highlights the recent weakness in factory orders. Orders for machinery ticked up just 0.5% after a 6.4% drop during August. That left the three-month growth rate at -9.5%.Primary metals orders fell sharply for the second consecutive month with a 4.5% (+1.6% y/y) drop which followed a downwardly revised 12.5% August plunge. New orders for electrical equipment increased 1.5% (1.1% y/y) after a 3.5% August decline. On a three-month basis these orders were down at a 35.0% annual rate.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081029c.jpg" width="353">
New orders for computers &amp; electronic products continued on their weaker trend-line with a 1.4% drop last month. On a three-month basis these orders fell at a 15.0% annual rate after their 2.1% decline during all of last year. Orders for just computers &amp; related products fell 2.8% and on a three-month basis they were off at a 47.9% annual rate. New orders for communications equipment also have been quite weak and they fell 14.6% last month. Three-month growth was -36.6% (AR) after last year&#39;s 7.5% decline.
Reflecting past weakness in new orders was a 0.2% rise in overall shipments of durable goods which made up little of a 4.2% August fall. During the last three months growth was a negative 7.6% (AR) after last year&#39;s negligible 0.1% uptick. For comparison, industrial production of durable goods during the last three months fell at a 13.5%. During the last ten years there has been a 62% correlation between the three-month change in shipments of durable goods and the change in durables industrial production. Less transportation, shipments of durable goods fell 0.4% following a 2.9% August drop. Three-month growth fell to -4.8% (AR).
Inventories of durable goods rose just 0.4% (8.1% y/y), the weakest monthly increase since last October. Three-month growth eased slightly to a still strong 8.8%. Less transportation, inventories rose a weaker 0.5% and the three-month growth rate eased slightly to 9.4% (AR) after the 1.4% rise during 2007.
Addressing the Credit Crisis is a speech given earlier this month by Dallas Fed President Richard W. Fisher and it can be found <a href="http://dallasfed.org/news/speeches/fisher/2008/fs081012.cfm">here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@ED/@ED01/@ED0101/@ED0101.HTM">NAICS Classification</a> (%)</th>
<th scope="col">September</th>
<th scope="col">August</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2007</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Durable Goods Orders</td>
<td>0.8</td>
<td>-5.5</td>
<td>-3.6</td>
<td>1.4</td>
<td>6.2</td>
<td>10.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Excluding Transportation</td>
<td>-1.1</td>
<td>-4.1</td>
<td>-0.6</td>
<td>-0.3</td>
<td>9.1</td>
<td>9.1</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Nondefense Capital Goods</td>
<td>0.8</td>
<td>-7.7</td>
<td>-7.2</td>
<td>3.5</td>
<td>9.4</td>
<td>17.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;Excluding Aircraft</td>
<td>-1.4</td>
<td>-2.2</td>
<td>0.5</td>
<td>-2.7</td>
<td>10.7</td>
<td>11.6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

During September, new orders for durable goods ticked up 0.8% after falling 5.5% during August, a decline revised from the -4.5% figure reported initially. Though the September rise in orders beat Consensus expectations for a 1.0% [...]

U.S. Durable Goods Orders Ticked Up

Robert Brusca

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html><head>
<style>
.odd{
background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081029a.jpg" align="left" border="0" height="265" width="353">
Japan&#8217;s IP fell sharply by 3.5% in August, but it has made a
substantial rebound in September. Still the trends for IP all are
lower, as the sequential growth rates in the table below show. The
rebounds by sector in September are only about one-third of the drop
made in August.
Year-over-year, Japan&#8217;s IP is still rising at a 2.7% pace.
Consumer goods output is up by a strong 3.9% while investment goods
output is up by 0.5% at an annual rate. The investment goods side is
slowing down faster than the consumer goods side.
That trend is in place for the quarter as well. With the
September figures just in to complete the quarter, Q3 reveals that
overall IP is falling at a 5% pace in MFG. Investment goods output is
dropping at a sizeable 13.2% pace while the output of consumer goods is
still up at a 4.1% pace. Since consumers are showing weakness around
the world in terms of lower confidence and reduced spending and since
Japan is a strong exporter of consumer goods this sector is due to get
hit much harder.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup></colgroup>
<thead><tr><th colspan="9" scope="col">Japan Industrial Production Trends </th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;</td>
<td colspan="3">m/m %</td>
<td colspan="3">Saar %</td>
<td>Yr/Yr</td>
<td>Qtr-to-Date</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">seas adjusted</td>
<td>Sep-08</td>
<td>Aug-08</td>
<td>Jul-08</td>
<td>3-mo</td>
<td>6-mo</td>
<td>12-mo</td>
<td>Yr-Ago</td>
<td>% AR</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Mining &amp; Mfg</td>
<td>1.2%</td>
<td>-3.5%</td>
<td>1.3%</td>
<td>-4.1%</td>
<td>-1.3%</td>
<td>-1.9%</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
<td>-4.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Total Industry</td>
<td>1.1%</td>
<td>-3.6%</td>
<td>1.5%</td>
<td>-4.1%</td>
<td>-1.3%</td>
<td>-2.1%</td>
<td>3.0%</td>
<td>-4.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">MFG</td>
<td>1.1%</td>
<td>-3.5%</td>
<td>1.2%</td>
<td>-4.8%</td>
<td>-1.7%</td>
<td>-2.1%</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
<td>-5.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Textiles</td>
<td>-1.4%</td>
<td>-0.2%</td>
<td>-2.9%</td>
<td>-16.6%</td>
<td>-13.7%</td>
<td>-10.6%</td>
<td>-6.8%</td>
<td>-16.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">T-port</td>
<td>4.4%</td>
<td>-9.8%</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>-7.9%</td>
<td>-1.2%</td>
<td>-1.3%</td>
<td>10.4%</td>
<td>-7.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="9" class="firstcol">Product Group</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Consumer Goods</td>
<td>0.9%</td>
<td>-3.3%</td>
<td>3.6%</td>
<td>4.5%</td>
<td>4.3%</td>
<td>0.6%</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
<td>4.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Intermediate Goods</td>
<td>0.5%</td>
<td>-2.3%</td>
<td>-0.2%</td>
<td>-7.8%</td>
<td>-3.6%</td>
<td>-1.8%</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
<td>-5.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Investment Goods</td>
<td>4.7%</td>
<td>-5.2%</td>
<td>-0.5%</td>
<td>-5.1%</td>
<td>-2.4%</td>
<td>-4.9%</td>
<td>0.5%</td>
<td>-13.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Mining</td>
<td>-4.4%</td>
<td>1.6%</td>
<td>4.2%</td>
<td>4.7%</td>
<td>2.5%</td>
<td>-1.4%</td>
<td>1.8%</td>
<td>12.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Electricity &amp; Gas</td>
<td>2.0%</td>
<td>-7.6%</td>
<td>6.3%</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>-0.8%</td>
<td>-3.9%</td>
<td>8.8%</td>
<td>-1.8%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body></html>

Japan’s IP fell sharply by 3.5% in August, but it has made a substantial rebound in September. Still the trends for IP all are lower, as the sequential growth rates in the table below show. The rebounds by sector in September are only [...]

Japan’s Industrial Output Recoups Some of Loss

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html><head>
<style>
.odd{
background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081029b.jpg" align="left" border="0" height="265" width="353">
During September, new orders for durable goods ticked up 0.8%
after falling 5.5% during August, a decline revised from the -4.5%
figure reported initially. Though the September rise in orders beat
Consensus expectations for a 1.0% decline, there where few, if any,
areas of strength. The gain mostly reflected a 21.8% (-16.6% y/y) jump
in new orders for aircraft &amp; parts that offset most of a
decline during August. (Nondefense aircraft orders rose 29.7% (-34.1%
y/y).
Highlighting the weakness in durable goods orders last month
was a 1.1% decline in new orders less the transportation sector
altogether. That followed a 4.1% drop during August, initially reported
at down 3.0%. The September decline about matched Consensus
expectations but during the last three months, orders less the
transportation sector fell at a 19.0% annual rate.
The rise in aircraft orders did lift overall orders for
nondefense capital goods by 0.8%, but that followed a little-revised
7.7% plunge during August. Without aircraft, nondefense capital goods
orders fell 1.4% after 2.2% drop during August. These declines lowered
the three-month growth rate to -12.4%, the worst since early last year.
During the last ten years there has been an 80% correlation between the
y/y gain in nondefense capital goods orders and the rise in equipment
&amp; software spending in the GDP accounts. The correlation of the
GDP figure with capital goods shipments is, as one would expect, a
larger 92%.
The industry detail highlights the recent weakness in factory
orders. Orders for machinery ticked up just 0.5% after a 6.4% drop
during August. That left the three-month growth rate at -9.5%.Primary
metals orders fell sharply for the second consecutive month with a 4.5%
(+1.6% y/y) drop which followed a downwardly revised 12.5% August
plunge. New orders for electrical equipment increased 1.5% (1.1% y/y)
after a 3.5% August decline. On a three-month basis these orders were
down at a 35.0% annual rate.<img src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081029c.jpg" align="right" border="0" height="265" width="353">
New orders for computers &amp; electronic products
continued on their weaker trend-line with a 1.4% drop last month. On a
three-month basis these orders fell at a 15.0% annual rate after their
2.1% decline during all of last year. Orders for just computers
&amp; related products fell 2.8% and on a three-month basis they
were off at a 47.9% annual rate. New orders for communications
equipment also have been quite weak and they fell 14.6% last month.
Three-month growth was -36.6% (AR) after last year's 7.5% decline.
Reflecting past weakness in new orders was a 0.2% rise in
overall shipments of durable goods which made up little of a 4.2%
August fall. During the last three months growth was a negative 7.6%
(AR) after last year's negligible 0.1% uptick. For comparison,
industrial production of durable goods during the last three months
fell at a 13.5%. During the last ten years there has been a 62%
correlation between the three-month change in shipments of durable
goods and the change in durables industrial production. Less
transportation, shipments of durable goods fell 0.4% following a 2.9%
August drop. Three-month growth fell to -4.8% (AR).
Inventories of durable goods rose just 0.4% (8.1% y/y), the
weakest monthly increase since last October. Three-month growth eased
slightly to a still strong 8.8%. Less transportation, inventories rose
a weaker 0.5% and the three-month growth rate eased slightly to 9.4%
(AR) after the 1.4% rise during 2007.
Addressing the Credit Crisis is a speech
given earlier this month by Dallas Fed President Richard W. Fisher and
it can be found <a href="http://dallasfed.org/news/speeches/fisher/2008/fs081012.cfm">here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead><tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@ED/@ED01/@ED0101/@ED0101.HTM">NAICS
Classification</a> (%)</th>
<th scope="col">September</th>
<th scope="col">August</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2007</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Durable Goods Orders</td>
<td>0.8</td>
<td>-5.5</td>
<td>-3.6</td>
<td>1.4</td>
<td>6.2</td>
<td>10.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Excluding Transportation</td>
<td>-1.1</td>
<td>-4.1</td>
<td>-0.6</td>
<td>-0.3</td>
<td>9.1</td>
<td>9.1</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Nondefense Capital Goods</td>
<td>0.8</td>
<td>-7.7</td>
<td>-7.2</td>
<td>3.5</td>
<td>9.4</td>
<td>17.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;Excluding Aircraft</td>
<td>-1.4</td>
<td>-2.2</td>
<td>0.5</td>
<td>-2.7</td>
<td>10.7</td>
<td>11.6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
U.S. Mortgage Applications
Recovered Last Week; Off Two-Thirds From Peak 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom
Moeller</a> October 29, 2008


<img src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081029d.jpg" align="left" border="0">
The total number of mortgage applications rose 28.5% last week
and that recovered all of the prior period's decline, according to the
Mortgage Bankers Association. Nevertheless, the October average fell
20.0% from September and applications were two-thirds below their peak
reached this past January.
Last week, applications for a mortgage to purchase a home made
up most of the prior week's decline with an 8.5% rise. For October so
far, however, purchase applications reversed most of the prior month's
gain with a 13.3% decline. During the latest week purchase applications
were down 43% from their 2005 peak.
During the last ten years there has been a 61% correlation
between the y/y change in purchase applications and the change in new
plus existing single family home sales. Figures covering sales of
existing single-family home will be available this Friday while
single-family home sales will be published early next week.
Applications to refinance a home mortgage recovered most of
the prior week's decline with a 28.5% increase but applications in
October overall remained 20% below September. During September,
applications to refinance had risen 61.9% from August as 15-year
mortgage rates fell briefly to 5.54%.<img src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081029e.jpg" align="right" border="0">
The effective interest rate on a conventional 15-year mortgage
slipped last week to 6.30% following an average of 6.01% last month.
For a 30-year mortgage, rates slipped w/w to 6.48%. Interest rates on
15 and 30 year mortgages are closely correlated (&gt;90%) with the
rate on 10-year Treasury securities. For an adjustable rate 1-Year
mortgage the rate also slipped w/w to 6.95% after having averaged 6.70%
last month.
During the last ten years there has been a (negative) 79%
correlation between the level of applications for purchase and the
effective interest rate on a 30-year mortgage.
The Mortgage Bankers Association surveys between 20 to 35 of
the top lenders in the U.S. housing industry to derive its refinance,
purchase and market indexes. The weekly survey covers roughly 50% of
all U.S. residential mortgage applications processed each week by
mortgage banks, commercial banks and thrifts. Visit the Mortgage
Bankers Association site <a href="http://www.mbaa.org">here</a>.
The figures for weekly mortgage applications are available in
Haver's SURVEYW database.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead><tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/SURVEYW/@S5/@S5.HTM">MBA
Mortgage Applications (3/16/90=100)</a></th>
<th scope="col">10/24/08</th>
<th scope="col">10/17/08</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2007</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Total Market Index</td>
<td>476.7</td>
<td>408.1</td>
<td>-30.1%</td>
<td>652.6</td>
<td>584.2</td>
<td>708.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Purchase</td>
<td>303.1</td>
<td>279.3</td>
<td>-26.6%</td>
<td>424.9</td>
<td>406.9</td>
<td>470.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Refinancing</td>
<td>1,489.4</td>
<td>1,158.8</td>
<td>-33.8%</td>
<td>1,997.9</td>
<td>1,634.0</td>
<td>2,092.3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
FOMC Cut Funds Rate to 1.00%; The
Lowest Since 2004 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom
Moeller</a> October 29, 2008


<img src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081029f.jpg" align="left" border="0" height="265" width="353">
The Federal Open Market Committee today cut the Federal funds
rate, as expected, to 1.00% from 1.50%. The discount rate also was cut
to 1.25%. The latest Fed funds rate was its lowest since 2004.
The Fed indicated three specific reasons for lowering interest
rates today. 1) A slowdown in U.S. economic growth due to slower
consumer spending and weaker business investment spending 2) Financial
market turmoil and 3) an expectation for moderation in inflation due to
lower energy and other commodity prices as well as slower economic
growth.
Credit market conditions were expected by the Fed to improve
due to interest rate cuts around the world, "extraordinary liquidity
measures" and actions to strengthen financial systems.<img src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081029g.jpg" align="right" border="0" height="265" width="353">
The decision was unanimous amongst FOMC voters.
For the complete text of the Fed's latest press release please
follow this <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20081029a.htm">link</a>.
How Economic News Moves Markets from the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York can be found <a href="http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/current_issues/ci14-6.pdf">here</a>. 
 
 
 
 
 
 


<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead><tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">Current</th>
<th scope="col">Last</th>
<th scope="col">September</th>
<th scope="col">2007</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Federal Funds Rate, % (Target)</td>
<td>1.00</td>
<td>1.50</td>
<td>2.00</td>
<td>5.05</td>
<td>4.96</td>
<td>3.19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Discount Rate, %</td>
<td>1.25</td>
<td>1.75</td>
<td>2.25</td>
<td>5.86</td>
<td>5.96</td>
<td>4.19</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Japan&#8217;s Industrial Output Recoups
Some of Loss 
by <a href="/comment/Brusca.html">Robert
Brusca</a> October 29, 2008


<img src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081029a.jpg" align="left" border="0" height="265" width="353">
Japan&#8217;s IP fell sharply by 3.5% in August, but it has made a
substantial rebound in September. Still the trends for IP all are
lower, as the sequential growth rates in the table below show. The
rebounds by sector in September are only about one-third of the drop
made in August.
Year-over-year, Japan&#8217;s IP is still rising at a 2.7% pace.
Consumer goods output is up by a strong 3.9% while investment goods
output is up by 0.5% at an annual rate. The investment goods side is
slowing down faster than the consumer goods side.
That trend is in place for the quarter as well. With the
September figures just in to complete the quarter, Q3 reveals that
overall IP is falling at a 5% pace in MFG. Investment goods output is
dropping at a sizeable 13.2% pace while the output of consumer goods is
still up at a 4.1% pace. Since consumers are showing weakness around
the world in terms of lower confidence and reduced spending and since
Japan is a strong exporter of consumer goods this sector is due to get
hit much harder.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup></colgroup>
<thead><tr> <th colspan="9" scope="col">Japan
Industrial Production Trends </th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;</td>
<td colspan="3">m/m %</td>
<td colspan="3">Saar %</td>
<td>Yr/Yr</td>
<td>Qtr-to-Date</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">seas adjusted</td>
<td>Sep-08</td>
<td>Aug-08</td>
<td>Jul-08</td>
<td>3-mo</td>
<td>6-mo</td>
<td>12-mo</td>
<td>Yr-Ago</td>
<td>% AR</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Mining &amp; Mfg</td>
<td>1.2%</td>
<td>-3.5%</td>
<td>1.3%</td>
<td>-4.1%</td>
<td>-1.3%</td>
<td>-1.9%</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
<td>-4.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Total Industry</td>
<td>1.1%</td>
<td>-3.6%</td>
<td>1.5%</td>
<td>-4.1%</td>
<td>-1.3%</td>
<td>-2.1%</td>
<td>3.0%</td>
<td>-4.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">MFG</td>
<td>1.1%</td>
<td>-3.5%</td>
<td>1.2%</td>
<td>-4.8%</td>
<td>-1.7%</td>
<td>-2.1%</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
<td>-5.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Textiles</td>
<td>-1.4%</td>
<td>-0.2%</td>
<td>-2.9%</td>
<td>-16.6%</td>
<td>-13.7%</td>
<td>-10.6%</td>
<td>-6.8%</td>
<td>-16.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">T-port</td>
<td>4.4%</td>
<td>-9.8%</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>-7.9%</td>
<td>-1.2%</td>
<td>-1.3%</td>
<td>10.4%</td>
<td>-7.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="9" class="firstcol">Product Group</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Consumer Goods</td>
<td>0.9%</td>
<td>-3.3%</td>
<td>3.6%</td>
<td>4.5%</td>
<td>4.3%</td>
<td>0.6%</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
<td>4.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Intermediate Goods</td>
<td>0.5%</td>
<td>-2.3%</td>
<td>-0.2%</td>
<td>-7.8%</td>
<td>-3.6%</td>
<td>-1.8%</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
<td>-5.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Investment Goods</td>
<td>4.7%</td>
<td>-5.2%</td>
<td>-0.5%</td>
<td>-5.1%</td>
<td>-2.4%</td>
<td>-4.9%</td>
<td>0.5%</td>
<td>-13.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Mining</td>
<td>-4.4%</td>
<td>1.6%</td>
<td>4.2%</td>
<td>4.7%</td>
<td>2.5%</td>
<td>-1.4%</td>
<td>1.8%</td>
<td>12.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Electricity &amp; Gas</td>
<td>2.0%</td>
<td>-7.6%</td>
<td>6.3%</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>-0.8%</td>
<td>-3.9%</td>
<td>8.8%</td>
<td>-1.8%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body></html>

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html><head>
<style>
.odd{
background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081028g.jpg" align="left" border="0" height="265" width="353">
Reflecting turbulence in the financial markets, the Conference
Board reported that its October index of consumer confidence collapsed
by more than one-third m/m to a record low level.
The latest index level of 38.0, off by two-thirds from last year,
followed a level of 61.4 during September. Consensus expectations had
been for a lesser m/m decline to a reading of 52.0.
During the last ten years there has been a 79% correlation
between the level of consumer confidence and the y/y change in real
consumer spending.
This month's decline reflected a 42.3% m/m plunge in the
expectations component of the index. The index was at a record low
level and the October drop followed increases during the prior three
months.<img src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081028h.jpg" align="right" border="0" height="265" width="353">
Fewer jobs were seen by 41.5% of respondents, the highest
since 1980. Only 4.4% planned to buy an automobile and just 3.3%
planned to buy carpet. Both of these percentages set the record low for
the series. Twenty six percent of respondents planned to buy a major
appliance within six months, near the fifteen year low. Only 2.7% of
respondents planned to buy a home within six months, down from the high
near 5% in 1999.
The percentage of respondents expecting business conditions to
worsen in six months jumped to 36.6%, the highest level since the
credit crunch of 1980. Only 9.9% expected improvement in conditions.
Down by nearly one-third m/m, the present conditions index
fell to the lowest level since 1992. Jobs were seen as hard to get by
37.2% of respondents, the highest since 1993 and jobs were seen as
plentiful by just 8.9%. Business conditions were seen as good by just
9.2%, the lowest since 1991. Those who thought it bad rose to 38.3%,
also the highest since 1992.
Expectations for the inflation rate in twelve months
surprisingly rose to 6.9%, the highest level since July. 
The Enduring Challenge of Concentrated Poverty: Case
Studies from Communities Across the U.S. from the U.S.
Federal Reserve Board is available <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/other/20081024a.htm">
here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead><tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">Conference
Board &nbsp;(SA, 1985=100)</th>
<th scope="col">October</th>
<th scope="col">September</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y %</th>
<th scope="col">2007</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Consumer
Confidence Index</td>
<td>38.0</td>
<td>61.4</td>
<td>-60.1</td>
<td>103.4</td>
<td>105.9</td>
<td>100.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;
Present Situation</td>
<td>41.9</td>
<td>61.1</td>
<td>-64.5</td>
<td>128.8</td>
<td>130.2</td>
<td>116.1</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;
Expectations</td>
<td>35.5</td>
<td>61.5</td>
<td>-55.6</td>
<td>86.4</td>
<td>89.7</td>
<td>89.7</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body></html>

Reflecting turbulence in the financial markets, the Conference Board reported that its October index of consumer confidence collapsed by more than one-third m/m to a record low level. The latest index level of 38.0, off by two-thirds [...]

Consumer Confidence Collapses To Record Low

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html><head>
<style>
.odd{
background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081028e.jpg" align="left" border="0" height="265" width="353">
The S&amp;P/Case-Shiller Composite 20
Home Price Index fell another 1.0% in August which about matched the
July drop. Since their peak in July 2006 prices have fallen
20.0% -- down 16.6% during the last twelve months. The series
dates back only to 2000. The decline in August prices was as expected.
The Case-Shiller index of 20 U.S. cities and their surrounding
areas is weighted to reflect price changes due to extensive remodeling,
home additions or extreme neglect. For example, smaller weights are
assigned to sales of homes that have undergone extensive remodeling.
The Case-Shiller composite index of homes in 10 metropolitan
areas, which has a longer history and dates back to 1987, fell 1.1% in
August, the same as during July. The index was down 17.7% year-to-year.<img src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/081028f.jpg" align="right" border="0" height="265" width="353">
Home prices in Phoenix, Nevada continued quite weak and fell
2.9% during August (-30.7% y/y) and in San Diego prices fell 2.3%
(-25.8% y/y). Home prices in Las Vegas, Nevada were down 2.4% (-30.6%
y/y), about as they were in July. Prices in Miami also repeated their
August performance and fell 1.8% (-28.1% y/y) while the same was true
for home prices in Los Angeles, down 26.7% y/y. In San Francisco home
prices were off 27.3% y/y and prices in Tampa, Florida posted an 18.1%
y/y decline.
In the Northeast home prices have held up relatively well. In
New York prices fell a lesser 6.9% y/y and they were down 4.7% in
Boston. In Dallas prices also were off a modest 2.7% y/y and by 2.8% in
Charlotte, North Carolina. In Denver home prices were off 5.1% y/y and
they were down 6.6% in Cleveland Ohio.
The S&amp;P/Case-Shiller home price series can be found in
Haver's USECON database but the city data is in the
REGIONAL database.
The latest press release from Standard &amp; Poor's can be
found <a href="http://www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/pdf/index/CSHomePrice_Release_102831.pdf">here</a>.
An overview of the S&amp;P/Case-Shiller home price series
can be found <a href="http://www2.standardandpoors.com/portal/site/sp/en/us/page.topic/indices_csmahp/0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0.html">here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead><tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">S&amp;P/Case-Shiller
Home Price Index (NSA, Jan 00 = 100)</th>
<th scope="col">August</th>
<th scope="col">July</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2007</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">20 City Composite
Index</td>
<td>164.57</td>
<td>166.29</td>
<td>-16.6%</td>
<td>-3.8%</td>
<td>7.6%</td>
<td>15.8%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body></html>

The S&P/Case-Shiller Composite 20 Home Price Index fell another 1.0% in August which about matched the July drop. Since their peak in July 2006 prices have fallen 20.0% -- down 16.6% during the last twelve months. The series dates [...]

Home Prices Fell 20% Indicates Case-Shiller

Subdued global shipping costs not yet pointing to supply chain problems

PMIs show still-elevated but slowing US inflation

AI boosting US investment in data centers

US productivity growth has been significantly faster than in other major economies

Consumers' short-term US inflation expectations still elevated while longer-term expectations of financial markets are steady

US financial markets have gotten used to elevated policy uncertainty

FOMC now expects more rate cuts going forward than in June

China gaining ASEAN exports while US exports slump

Job openings less than the number unemployed in July for first time since 2021

Reaccelerating goods price inflation along with sticky services inflation clouds the outlook

Falling oil prices aren't pulling down inflation expectations, pointing to a boost from increased tariffs

Equity market exuberance outpacing macroeconomic data

Apart from Japan, Blue Chip forecasters expect further sizable monetary easing

US production rebounded in Q2, but demand continued to slow

US leader, Germany trailer for real GDP growth over past 3 years

Negative US inflation surprises leading G10 down

Deflation continues in China

Incoming data surprising on downside in US; positive surprises elsewhere

FOMC expects more inflation and less growth than in March

With escalation of Israel/Iran conflict, geopolitical risk has recently surged while US trade policy uncertainty has ebbed

Renewed supply chain pressures point to a rebound in global inflation ahead

Apart from Japan, Blue Chip forecasters look for further significant monetary policy easing

Apart from the US, productivity is moribund

Financial market concerns ebb even though policy uncertainty continues to soar

US tariff revenues nearly doubled in April

Our global data offering is unparalleled in terms of coverage, quality, and organization. We offer 290+ databases from 2500 government and private sources, a wealth of key survey and forecast data covering the world’s economies, and a robust offering of archive databases that drive machine learning for big data applications.

Optimized for precision analytics, our data is seamlessly integrated with Microsoft Office and all leading statistical packages through our DLX® software and platform independent HaverView™ website. We further offer direct database feeds, client server or cloud-based delivery, and RESTful API.


Privacy Policy

Disclaimer

Contact us

A premier time series data platform for the global strategy, research, and quant communities. 

London

Singapore

Tokyo

New York

Economy in Brief

Viewpoints

Contact Us

Our Data

Our Products

What We Do

Our Authors

About Us

Data News

Resources

Release Calendars

Training Center

Webinars

Newsletters

Download Software

For Clients

Live Updates

251031A2.jpg

251031D2.jpg

The Industrial Materials Price Index from the Foundation for International Business and Economic Research (FIBER) improved 0.3% during the four weeks ended October 31, 2025 after holding steady in the prior four week period. The index increased 0.8% y/y.

**Metals** group prices increased 4.3% (6.1% y/y) in the last four weeks as the cost of aluminum rose 7.0% (9.5% y/y). Copper scrap prices improved 6.5% (16.4% y/y) while zinc prices strengthened 6.8% in four weeks (3.0% y/y). Steel scrap prices rose 2.3% (-6.6% y/y) and tin prices increased 2.2% (16.1% y/y). Lead prices improved 1.1% (unchanged y/y) in four weeks.

Prices in the **Textile** group increased 1.2% during the last four weeks, and rose 2.4% y/y. The cost of burlap strengthened 14.5% in the last four weeks while surging 37.6% over the last year. Offsetting this rise, cotton prices fell 1.2% and declined 5.8% y/y.

**Miscellaneous** group prices weakened 3.0% in the last four weeks, unchanged y/y, as framing lumber prices fell 6.5% (+4.1% y/y). The cost of tallow, used for frying & baking, declined 13.1% (+11.2% y/y) in four weeks. Offsetting this weakness, natural rubber prices held steady (-10.1% y/y).

Prices in the **crude oil & benzene** group declined 1.7% (-9.3% y/y) in the last four weeks. The cost of West Texas Intermediate crude oil fell 3.1% in four weeks to $60.80 per barrel and declined 11.7% y/y. The price was increased from a low of $58.47 in the third week of the month. The price of the petro-chemical benzene fell 2.9% (-23.3% y/y) in four weeks.

**Excluding crude oil**, the industrial commodity price index rose 0.5% (1.6% y/y) over the last four weeks, the same as during the prior four weeks.

The Foundation for International Business and Economic Research (FIBER) develops economic measurement techniques as applied to business cycles and inflation in the U.S. and other market economies. The commodity price data can be found in Haver's **DAILY**, **WEEKLY**, **USECON** and **CMDTY** databases.

251031C2.jpg

251031B2.jpg

- Metals and textile prices strengthen.
- Framing lumber costs backpedal.
- Crude oil prices weaken.

FIBER: Industrial Commodity Price Index Edges Higher in Latest Four Weeks

Andrew Cates

**US monetary policy**
This first chart shows that Chair Powell’s cautious tone in the aftermath of this week’s FOMC meeting led markets to scale back expectations for further near-term easing. Fed funds futures for late 2025 through mid-2026 rose slightly, signalling that investors now expect a shallower and slower easing cycle than before. While the rate cut itself confirmed the Fed’s gradual pivot toward easier policy, markets interpreted Powell’s remarks as suggesting that a December move is not guaranteed and that the central bank remains wary of declaring victory on inflation too soon.

251030Z1.jpg

**The global business cycle**
The latest flash PMI surveys for October highlight a still-divergent global picture, with services-led resilience offsetting persistent manufacturing weakness. Activity remains strongest in India and the United States, both comfortably in expansion territory, while Germany has shown one of the clearest signs of improvement within the euro area after a long period of contraction. The broader euro area and UK readings point to modest but positive momentum, suggesting that growth is stabilising rather than accelerating. In contrast, France remains mired below the 50 threshold, signalling continued contraction, and Japan and Australia are treading water with only marginal gains.

251030Z2.jpg

**Consumer confidence in the US and Europe** 
Consumer confidence trends have diverged across major economies in 2025. In the UK, sentiment has improved gradually, supported by easing inflation and lower interest rates. In the euro area, confidence has stabilised after a prolonged downturn, though households remain wary. By contrast, US confidence has slipped further, probably reflecting a softening labour market, slowing wage growth, and heightened concern about job security. Overall, global consumer sentiment remains fragile and uneven, suggesting that household spending could stay subdued even if price pressures recede and monetary policy becomes more accommodative.

251030Z3.jpg

**Credit conditions in the euro area** 
The latest data on Euro Area M3 growth underline that monetary conditions remain mildly restrictive, even after the ECB’s recent rate reductions. Money growth has decelerated sharply over the past year, with only a limited contribution from private-sector credit and little net support from lending to government. The ECB’s Q4 Bank Lending Survey, released this week, suggests that while financing conditions are beginning to ease, credit dynamics remain weak. Banks reported a further net tightening of credit standards for firms, reflecting continued risk aversion, even as loan demand from businesses and households picked up modestly thanks to lower interest rates and improving sentiment.

251030Z4.jpg

**The UK manufacturing sector**
Turning to the UK, the latest CBI Industrial Trends Survey offers little sign of improvement in manufacturing conditions. The balance of firms reporting excess stocks of finished goods has fallen further into negative territory, consistent with efforts to run down inventories amid weak demand and high uncertainty. And on that score, the share of firms citing uncertainty about demand over the next year as a constraint on capital expenditure has shifted up, highlighting persistent caution in investment planning. Together, these indicators point to a sector still struggling to regain momentum after a protracted slowdown—one where firms are prioritising cost control and liquidity preservation over expansion, despite an easing in headline inflation and gradual monetary policy support.

251030Z5.jpg

**Traded goods price inflation**
The Drewry Container Index, which tracks global shipping costs for a standard 40-foot container, has fallen back in recent months from the elevated levels seen in 2024, reflecting softer global trade volumes and a partial unwinding of last year’s supply-chain pressures. Even so, concerns have re-emerged that new US tariff measures and associated logistical bottlenecks could push freight rates and producer price inflation (PPI) higher in the coming months. The final chart below illustrates how closely traded goods price inflation, represented by Haver’s aggregation of PPI inflation for advanced economies, has tended to move with swings in container shipping costs. While traded goods inflation remains subdued for now, any renewed disruptions to global shipping routes or tariff-driven frictions could quickly feed through to higher input costs—especially in manufacturing sectors reliant on long and complex supply chains.

251030Z6.jpg

Global equity markets are once again flirting with record highs, buoyed by renewed optimism that the global economy can achieve a soft landing—and by persistent enthusiasm over the potential productivity gains from AI-related investment. The Federal Reserve’s decision to cut rates by 25bps this week—its second this autumn—initially reinforced expectations that global monetary policy is shifting toward a more accommodative stance. However, Chair Powell’s reminder that a further cut in December was “not inevitable” tempered that optimism and was met with some disappointment in financial markets (chart 1). Even so, the broader tone remains constructive, though it contrasts with a still-fragile macro environment. Renewed conflict in Gaza, the ongoing US government shutdown, and intensifying trade tensions have kept risk sentiment uneven and underscored the fragility of the recovery. The latest flash PMIs (chart 2) show modest global expansion led by services, while manufacturing continues to struggle. Consumer confidence (chart 3) tells a similar story: sentiment has weakened in the US as the labour market softens, stabilised in the euro area, and improved slightly in the UK. In the euro area, sluggish money and credit growth (chart 4) and the ECB’s latest bank-lending survey confirm that financial conditions remain mildly restrictive despite recent rate cuts. The UK CBI Industrial Trends Survey (chart 5) points to manufacturers reducing inventories and deferring investment plans amid demand uncertainty. Externally, the Drewry Container Index (chart 6) has fallen back from 2024’s elevated levels, signalling easing supply-chain pressures and subdued traded-goods inflation—though tariff realignments remain a potential source of friction.

<iframe data-testid="embed-iframe" style="border-radius:12px" src="https://open.spotify.com/embed/episode/1qTfb8cqkuic21S0HPE4Wt?utm_source=generator" width="100%" height="152" frameBorder="0" allowfullscreen="" allow="autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; fullscreen; picture-in-picture" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Charts of the Week: Optimism with Caveats

251030A5.jpg

251030B5.jpg

Initial claims for unemployment insurance increased 11,892 during the week ended October 18 to 232,163. The increase reversed most of the earlier week’s decline of 14,839. The four-week moving average of initial claims edged up to 227,953 and have trended higher this year, after weakening late in 2024. The four- week average hit a low of 200,323 in January 2024.

Continuing claims for unemployment insurance fell to 1.947 million in the week ended October 11 from 1.928 million in the prior week. The four-week moving average edged up to 1.931 million, the highest level since early September and up 3.3% y/y, less than half the peak rate of growth in April 2023.

The insured unemployment rate varied greatly across individual states and territories. In the week ended October 11, the highest unemployment rates were in New Jersey (2.12%), Washington (1.99%), California (1.88%), Massachusetts (1.84%), District of Columbia (1.75%) and Connecticut (1.71%). The lowest were in South Dakota (0.24%), Florida (0.36%), North Carolina (0.41%), Louisiana (0.42%), Nebraska (0.48%) and Virginia (0.52%). Rates in other notable states include New York (1.46%), Illinois (1.49%), Pennsylvania (1.37%), and Texas (1.14%). These state data are not seasonally adjusted.

Data on weekly unemployment claims are from the Department of Labor itself, not the Bureau of Labor Statistics. They begin in 1967 and are contained in Haver’s **WEEKLY** database and summarized monthly in **USECON**. Data for individual states are in **REGIONW** back to December 1986.

251030C5.jpg

251030D5.jpg

- Rise in initial claims reverses earlier decline.
- Continuing claims jump.
- State unemployment rates vary.

U.S. Unemployment Insurance Claims Increase in Latest Week

251030E.jpg

The European monetary union’s index of sentiment created by the European Commission rose sharply in October to its highest level since April 2023. There were improvements in the three of the five sector indexes reported with only construction and services unchanged in October relative to their September values.

Despite the nice step-up in the indexes in October, they are still at relatively low values. Only two sectors, construction and retailing, have readings above their 50th percentiles with construction at a 77.5 percentile standing and retailing at a 51.5 percentile standing. The service sector has a low 27.5 percentile standing, consumer confidence is at a 24.3 percentile standing, and the industrial sector is at a 35.9 percentile. Data are ranked over observations back to 1990, where feasible.

**‘Better’ is not always ‘good’**
Clearly the euro area is not performing particularly well at this time. The rankings data make that especially clear. The service sector and the industrial sector are substantially below their historic medians. The median occurs at a queue (or rank) standing at the 50-percentile mark. Consumer confidence is in the lower 25-percentile of its range for this period; services are in their 27th percentile – a low ranking for such an important job creating sector.

**The largest have the best October showing**
The four largest economies in the euro area lead the way in the month and on the broader trip to mediocrity. Germany, France, and Italy each rise by one percentage point or more in October. More broadly, Italy and Spain are the only two ‘large economies’ with percentile standings above their respective 50th percentiles: Spain is at a 55.3 percentile standing, Italy at a 50.9 percentile standing. The largest two economies in the monetary union, Germany and France, respectively, have standings at the 19th percentile for Germany in the 33rd percentile for France.

**Granular performance of the Euro Area**
In October only one large economy backtracked compared to September and that's Spain; its hard decline of 0.9% came after its index rose by 2.9% in September. Among the remaining 14 economies, seven of them showed declines in October and seven of them showed increases. The pickup and performance for the monetary union in October is substantially on the back of the larger economies that are doing better while these smaller monetary union members are clearly mixed.

**Standings**
In terms of standings, the smaller monetary union economies show 5 of 14 with standings above their 50th percentile. These are Portugal at 51.5%, Cyprus at 56.2%, Lithuania at 64.4%, Greece at 71.1%, and Malta at a strong 89.1%.

**Summing up**
It is a good month statistically for the euro area. However, the gains are not widespread, and the sector performance is still mixed. But this is the strongest level for the EU sentiment index since April 2023, and that is something.

251030.jpg

Europe

EU Indexes Show Improvement in EMU in October; Index Last Higher in April 2023

251029F20.jpg

251029G20.jpg

At today’s meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee, the target range for the Fed funds rate was reduced to 3.75%-to-4.00% from 4.00%-to-4.25%. It was the lowest range since December 2022. The current range compares to a high of 5.25%-to-5.50% in mid-September 2024. Today’s target range matched expectations in the Action Economics Forecast Survey. The action was supported by all but two FOMC members; one preferred to lower the target range by 50 basis points and another preferred no cut.

The following statement was released after today’s meeting: “Available indicators suggest that economic activity has been expanding at a moderate pace. Job gains have slowed this year, and the unemployment rate has edged up but remained low through August; more recent indicators are consistent with these developments. Inflation has moved up since earlier in the year and remains somewhat elevated.”

“The Committee seeks to achieve maximum employment and inflation at the rate of 2 percent over the longer run. Uncertainty about the economic outlook remains elevated. The Committee is attentive to the risks to both sides of its dual mandate and judges that downside risks to employment rose in recent months.”

“The Committee decided to conclude the reduction of its aggregate securities holdings on December 1. The Committee is strongly committed to supporting maximum employment and returning inflation to its 2 percent objective.”

U.S. economic figures can be found in Haver’s **USECON** database & interest rate data are in the **WEEKLY** & **DAILY** databases.

251029H20.jpg

251029I20.jpg

- FOMC lowers funds rate target by quarter point for second time this year.
- The decision was approved by all but two FOMC voters.
- Asset purchases to end.

Economy in Brief: October 2008

Jump to:

U.S. 3Q'08 GDP Fell Modestly

FOMC Cut Funds Rate to 1.00%; The Lowest Since 2004

U.S. Mortgage Applications Recovered Last Week; Off Two-Thirds From Peak

U.S. Durable Goods Orders Ticked Up

Japan’s Industrial Output Recoups Some of Loss

U.S. Durable Goods Orders Ticked Up

Consumer Confidence Collapses To Record Low

Home Prices Fell 20% Indicates Case-Shiller