Economy in Brief

The just-released METI sector indexes for May show that the industry index has stepped down to 103.2 from 105.5 in April. The tertiary index, an indicator for the services sector, moved up to 102.0 from 100.8.

More on METI The graph shows that year-on-year growth for both sectors is positive, which is a good sign. The growth rate for the industry index is at its 78th percentile while the growth rate for services is at its 90th percentile. Both indexes log growth rates rankings over the past year that are solid and positive in comparison with their own histories.

However, in terms of levels, the industry index is extremely weak, at a 9.4-percentile standing. The level of industrial activity in May is in the lower 10-percentile of activity among all months since 1990. That is impressively disappointing. Comparing the services level historically we obtain a solid reading, at its 81st percentile. Of course, over time these indexes should grow; even an 81-percentile standing is not particularly strong. However, for industry having an index level that says weak as 9.4% on data since 2009, the ranking tells us that industry in Japan has been lagging recently, since it is a real activity index, not a diffusion index.

The table also looks at the growth in the industry and tertiary sectors from January 2020 just before COVID struck the worldwide economy. On that basis, the industry index is lower by 5.1% and the services sector is higher by only 0.4%, the former very weak, the latter, a small gain over such a long period of time.

Other Metrics The Economy Watchers Index In addition to the METI indexes, the table offers the economy watchers readings (a diffusion index). In May, the economy watchers index moved up to 55 from 54.6 in April; the growth rate of the index has a 55.2 percentile standing. However, the economy watchers index level was at 95.3%. So, the index level was solid/strong, but its growth rate over the last year is weaker than for the METI indexes. The economy watchers indicator for the service sector in May ticked up to 59.2 from 59.1; it has only a 47.6 percentile standing on growth, which puts it below its median growth rate since 1990 although for the service sector the index level has a 97.7 percentile standing. Strictly speaking, the standings of an index like METI, versus a diffusion index, like the economy watchers, are not directly comparable- one measures breadth, the other activity in absolute terms. The economy watchers index for employment overall moved up to 57.1 in May from 55.8 in April. The ranking of the growth rate is below its median at a 47.6 percentile standing and the standing of the index level, at its 76-percentile, a relatively a moderately firm standing for an index level on diffusion. The economy watchers survey also has a future gauge; in May, it slipped to 54.4 from 55.7; the growth of the future gauge sits in its 65.7 percentile, above its historic median. The index level for the future index is also relatively high at a 93-percentile standing. All the various components of the economy watchers index are higher compared to January 2020.

The Teikoku Index The Teikoku index is another diffusion index that looks at various sectors. Teikoku in May shows a slight improvement for manufacturing at a 41.5 diffusion reading; still with a diffusion value below 50 indicating contraction, but ever-so-slightly less contraction than a month ago as the reading ticked up from 41.4 in April. The growth ranking for the index is at its 53.1 percentile, modestly above its historic median. With the index level at a 57.6 percentile standing, the assessment is not particularly impressive. For services in May, the Teikoku index moves up to 51.6 from 50.8; the growth rate of services over the past year has a 79-percentile standing, a relatively solid standing with an index level standing at 87.2%. The Teikoku indices show all the components somewhat higher compared to their respective levels of January 2020, apart from construction that's lower on balance from its January level by 3.1 points.

Leading Economic Index The final metric in the table is the leading economic index. As of May, that index moved up to 109.5 from April’s 108.1. The growth rate for the leading index has a ranking at the 41.9 percentile which puts it below its historic median growth rate. The index level for the LEI is a weak 35-percentile standing, another relatively weak response based on the level of an activity index. However, leading index is higher by 7.7% from its level in January 2020, before the COVID virus struck the world economy; that’s something.

HICP Trends- Italian inflation fell by 0.2% in June; its core elevated by 0.4% month-to-month. Sequentially, headline inflation paces at 6.7% over 12 months, that falls to a very skinny 0.3% over 6 months, and then expands sharply to register an annualized gain of 5.5% over 3 months. The headline figure has been quite volatile. However, core inflation is up by 6.1% over 12 months, up at a 5.3% annual rate over 6 months and at a 4.3% annual rate over 3 months. The core rate shows sequential deceleration in the face of headline inflation turbulence.

Domestic inflation trends- Italy's domestic CPI follows the same pattern as the EMU-wide harmonized gauge (HICP) for its headline and core. The headline for domestic inflation rises 6.4% over 12 months, falls sharply on a 0.8% annual rate increase over 6 months, and then rises back to a 4.1% annual rate of change over 3 months. The domestic Italian CPI excluding food & energy shows sequential deceleration like its HICP counterpart. It rises at a 5.6% pace over 12 months, slides to a 4.8% pace over 6 months, and logs a 4.0% annual rate over 3 months. The HICP measure and the Italian domestic measure of inflation are giving the same signals about inflation. Headline inflation has been high and volatile and has had some bounce back over the last three months, while core inflation, undeterred, continues to edge down. But core inflation is still running at a rate of 4% or more over the last 3 months. Its pace over 12 months, on the other hand, a pace that that the ECB pays more attention to, is still in the area of 5 ½ percent to 6 ½ percent.

Acceleration/deceleration trends are mixed- The table provides evidence on inflation’s acceleration and deceleration over 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Over 3 months compared to 6 months, gauging acceleration across categories, inflation is accelerating in half the categories (diffusion = 50%). Over 6 months compared to 12 months, inflation accelerates in only about 42% of the categories. Over 12 months compared to 12-months ago, inflation accelerates in 83% of the categories. Looking at the data in the table, the year-on-year acceleration figure seems high considering that the HICP headline and the domestic CPI headline both show increases on the order of 6 ½ percent or so over 12 months compared to gains of over 8% a year ago. If inflation is so much lower now, why is diffusion higher in comparison? Looking at the core inflation rates, we find the answer: the year-ago HICP core inflation was 4.1%; over the last 12 months the core inflation rate is 6.1%; a year ago the domestic core rate was at 3.8% and over the last 12 months is 5.6%. So, while the headline gauges have decelerated, it’s the core rates that are accelerating and reflected in the diffusion index.

Quarter-to-date inflation- The quarter-to-date data reflect the finished second quarter. Inflation in Q2 logs in at a 2.8% annual rate increase for the headline and a 3.8% annual rate increase for the core in the HICP. Domestic inflation on the Italian gauge has a headline gain of 2.4% with the core much hotter at a 4.7% annual rate increase.