Tom Moeller

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060622a.jpg" width="353">
Initial unemployment insurance claims increased 11,000 to 308,000 last week. The rise followed a decline of 6,000 the week prior that was slightly shallower than initially estimated and about matched Consensus expectations for 309,000 claims.
The latest figure covers the survey period for June nonfarm payrolls and claims fell 36,000 (-10.5%) from the May period.
During the last ten years there has been a 78% (negative) correlation between the level of initial claims and the m/m change in payroll employment.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060622b.jpg" width="353">
The four-week moving average of initial claims dropped to 311,250 (-6.7% y/y).
Continuing claims for unemployment insurance rose 18,000 following a downwardly revised 11,000 increase the previous week.
The insured rate of unemployment remained stable at 1.9% for the fifth consecutive week.
Ups and Downs: How Wages Change Over the Business Cycle from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia is available <a href="http://www.philadelphiafed.org/files/br/br_q2-2006-1_ups-and-downs.pdf"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/WEEKLY/@W5/@W507/@W507.HTM">Unemployment Insurance (000s)</a></th>
<th scope="col">06/17/06</th>
<th scope="col">06/10/06</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Initial Claims</td>
<td>308</td>
<td>297</td>
<td>-4.3%</td>
<td>332</td>
<td>343</td>
<td>403</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;Continuing Claims</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>2,439</td>
<td>-6.8%</td>
<td>2,663</td>
<td>2,923</td>
<td>3,530</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Leading Economic Indicators Down Third Month in Four 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom Moeller</a> June 22, 2006


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060622c.jpg" width="353">
The May Composite Index of Leading Economic Indicators fell 0.6% last month after an unrevised 0.1% dip during April, reported the Conference Board. Consensus expectations had been for a 0.4% decline and it was the third drop in the last four months.
Six month growth in the leaders fell to -0.4%, its weakest since early 2001. During the last ten years there has been a 43% correlation between the six-month change in the leading indicators and quarterly growth in real GDP.
The breadth of one month gain amongst the 10 components of the leading index fell to 30% in May but over a six month span 50% of the index components rose, the weakest breadth of six month gain in a year. The only positive contributions to the May index were from higher orders for consumer goods and for capital goods as well as a more positive interest rate spread.
The method of calculating the contribution to the leading index from the spread between 10 year Treasury securities and the Fed funds rate has been revised. A negative contribution will now occur only when the spread inverts rather than when declining as in the past. More details can be found <a href="http://www.conference-board.org/pdf_free/economics/bci/lei0705.pdf">here</a>.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060622d.jpg" width="353">
The leading index is based on eight previously reported economic data series. Two series, orders for consumer goods and orders for capital goods, are estimated.
The coincident indicators ticked up 0.1% following four consecutive months of 0.2% gain. Of the four component series, 75% rose last month after two months when all the components rose. During the last six months all of the coincident series rose and over the last ten years there has been a 69% correlation between the change in the coincident indicators and real GDP growth.
The lagging indicators rose 0.2% for the third consecutive month. During May, 64.3% of the series&#39; components rose and during the last six months 42.9% rose. The ratio of coincident to lagging indicators, a measure of actual economic performance versus excess, fell slightly.
Visit the Conference Board&#39;s <a href="http://www.conference-board.org">site</a> for coverage of leading indicator series from around the world.
Transparency, Expectations, and Forecasts from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta is available <a href="http://www.frbatlanta.org/filelegacydocs/erq106_bauer.pdf"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/BCI/BCI.HTM">Business Cycle Indicators</a></th>
<th scope="col">May</th>
<th scope="col">April</th>
<th scope="col">6 Month Chg., AR</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Leading</td>
<td>-0.6%</td>
<td>-0.1%</td>
<td>2.9%</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>7.4%</td>
<td>5.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Coincident</td>
<td>0.1%</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
<td>3.5%</td>
<td>2.2%</td>
<td>2.5%</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Lagging</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
<td>1.6%</td>
<td>3.5%</td>
<td>0.0%</td>
<td>-0.0%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Refinery Gasoline Production Reaches Record in New Seasonally Adjusted Weekly Data 
by <a href="/comment/Stone.html">Carol Stone</a> June 22, 2006


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060622e.jpg" width="353">
Total production of petroleum products has surged in the last several weeks, and refineries are operating at their highest capacity since before last September&#39;s hurricanes. These statements are based on weekly petroleum supply statistics provided by the Energy Information Administration of the Department of Energy; just in the last month, Haver Analytics has begun to seasonally adjust these data, using the same software routine used by the Fed for the money supply and other weekly data. The raw figures are contained in the OILWKLY and WEEKLY databases, and the seasonally adjusted data are in WEEKLY. <img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060622f.jpg" width="353">
Domestic crude oil production continues its long downtrend. It was 5.05 million barrels/day (mil B/D) last week, compared with 5.10 mil B/D the week before and 5.38 mil B/D in the comparable 2005 week. So far during 2006, it has averaged 4.95 mil B/D, off 10% from 5.41 mil B/D in 2004. Domestic oil, of course, isn&#39;t nearly enough to meet today&#39;s energy needs in the US, and crude oil imports ran to 10.7 mil B/D last week, up almost exactly 8.0% from a year earlier. <img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060622g.jpg" width="353">
US refiners are producing more gasoline than ever, 9.34 mil B/D in the June 16 week, up 3.5% just in one week. The seasonal adjustment process is especially helpful here in smoothing the late winter/early spring slowdown due to refinery maintenance and then adjusting out the consequent rebound. This highlights the import of the latest week&#39;s jump: it&#39;s not due to some standard late-spring advance in gasoline output. Underlying gains in refinery output are also more evident in the refinery capacity utilization data, which also benefit from the seasonal adjustment. Last week&#39;s seasonally adjusted usage rate was 89.85%, which, except for one week in January, is the highest since late September 2005, just before Hurricane Rita.So gradually refiners are getting their capacity back on-stream. A hopeful note for limiting capacity pressures on product prices is that there are still a couple of percentage points of slack compared to pre-2005 levels, which were running between 91% and 92%. 

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/WEEKLY/@w5/@W508/@W50802/@W50802.HTM">Thous B/D,&nbsp; Seasonally Adjusted*</a> </th>
<th scope="col">June 16, 2006 </th>
<th scope="col">June 9, 2006 </th>
<th scope="col">May 19, 2006 </th>
<th scope="col">June 17, 2005 </th>
<th scope="col">2005 </th>
<th scope="col">2004 </th>
<th scope="col">2003 </th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Domestic Crude Oil Production </td>
<td>5,052 </td>
<td>5,095 </td>
<td>4,937 </td>
<td>5,380 </td>
<td>4,861 </td>
<td>5,410 </td>
<td>5,640 </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Crude Oil Imports </td>
<td>10,749 </td>
<td>10,267 </td>
<td>9,166 </td>
<td>9,929 </td>
<td>10,111 </td>
<td>10,044 </td>
<td>9,511 </td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Refinery Gasoline Production </td>
<td>9,343 </td>
<td>9,028 </td>
<td>8,991 </td>
<td>8,707 </td>
<td>8,662 </td>
<td>8,681 </td>
<td>8,471 </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Refinery Capacity Utilization (%) </td>
<td>89.85 </td>
<td>88.45 </td>
<td>87.05 </td>
<td>91.49 </td>
<td>90.29 </td>
<td>82.24 </td>
<td>91.83 </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Initial unemployment insurance claims increased 11,000 to 308,000 last week. The rise followed a decline of 6,000 the week prior that was slightly shallower than initially estimated and about matched Consensus expectations for 309,000 [...]

Initial Claims for Unemployment Insurance Up Slightly

Carol Stone, CBE

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060621c.jpg" width="353">
<span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Verdana;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;MS Mincho&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;
mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:JA;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA">The recently instituted business survey by Japan&#39;s Ministry of Finance showed a distinct slowing in its second quarter results, reported today. The survey is just two years old, so there is obviously not much history. But these results hardly seem surprising with energy prices remaining high, and the Bank of Japan widely expected to engineer an increase in interest rates in the weeks ahead. <img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060621d.jpg" width="353">
The overall &quot;business conditions&quot; gauge dropped from 6.1% (balance, favorable less unfavorable) in Q1 to 1.8% in Q2. It had already retreated from 10.5% in Q4/2005. In the manufacturing sector, business conditions eased this quarter to 1.4% from 3.1% last period. 
In Q2, the responding firms assessed &quot;overseas demand&quot; as stronger than &quot;domestic demand&quot;. The domestic sector was rated positively for Q2 at a net +6.9% of firms, while overseas demand conditions stood at +9.5%. However, for the prior couple of quarters, the opposite was the case, as domestic activity was positive by double-digit amounts and higher than ratings on the foreign sector by 3 to 4 points. <img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060621e.jpg" width="353">
There is a hint in some of the associated detail, particularly sales, that Q2 may be subject to some seasonality; after companies rush to do business in the final quarter of their fiscal year, Q1 in Japan, the next quarter is something of a letdown. With so little history here, it&#39;s premature to make a conclusion about that, but it may help explain the Q2 slowdown. 
Meantime, one other aspect of the survey results really stood out. For the first time in this survey, selling prices had a positive reading. It&#39;s only +0.6%, but even so, it is still another sign that the deflationary period in Japan may have ended.Nonetheless, rising costs took a greater toll on profits, so after a couple of favorable quarters in that item, it dipped back into negative territory. 

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/JAPAN/@J8/@J8.HTM">JAPAN: Large Firms,</a> % Balance</th>
<th scope="col">Q2 2006 </th>
<th scope="col">Q1 2006 </th>
<th scope="col">Q4 2006 </th>
<th scope="col">Q2 2005 </th>
<th scope="col">Q2 2004 </th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Business Conditions </td>
<td>1.8</td>
<td>6.1</td>
<td>10.5</td>
<td>0.9</td>
<td>7.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Manufacturing </td>
<td>1.4</td>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>10.5</td>
<td>-2.4</td>
<td>8.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Domestic Demand </td>
<td>6.9</td>
<td>11.5</td>
<td>14.2</td>
<td>1.4</td>
<td>8.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Overseas Demand </td>
<td>9.5</td>
<td>8.0</td>
<td>10.2</td>
<td>4.1</td>
<td>12.2</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Selling Prices </td>
<td>0.6</td>
<td>-3.2</td>
<td>-2.2</td>
<td>-3.9</td>
<td>-5.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

The recently instituted business survey by Japan's Ministry of Finance showed a distinct slowing in its second quarter results, reported today. The survey is just two years old, so there is obviously not much history. But these [...]

Japanese Business Confidence Diminishes Ahead of Possible Rate Hike

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060621g.jpg" width="353">
Gold prices at $567.00 per ounce yesterday were more than 20% lower than their high during May. (Since 1980 there has been a 56% correlation between the level of gold prices and the y/y change in consumer prices.)
In addition, the price of WTI crude oil at $68.94 per barrel is off 8% from the May high. These declines, however, seem more attributable to an easing of political tensions (Iran) than to some bona fide drop in inflation pressure. Measured price inflation is up, industrial commodity price inflation is up, inflation expectations are higher as well.
Consumer prices YTD have risen at a 5.2% annual rate in 2006 versus last year&#39;s 3.4% gain. The 3.1% rate of advance in &quot;core&quot; consumer price inflation is up from 3.3% growth last year, the 3.8% gain in core services prices is up one percentage point from last year and even the soft 1.2% rise in core goods prices is up from 0.5%.
The JoC-ECRI Industrial Metals Prices Index is up 25.2% this year due to higher prices for aluminum (up 35.4%), copper scrap (up 65.5%) and stainless steel scrap (up 17.6%). High grade copper prices have eased quite a bit from the earlier high but remain up 44.1% since year end &#39;05.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060621f.jpg" width="353">
Growth in industrial production is behind these gains. U.S. output gains have wobbled in recent months but factory production is up at a 3.9% annual rate this year, the same rate growth as during all of 2005. Output in the OECD Major Seven countries also is firm at 3.2% y/y through March. That&#39;s comparable to growth during the prior three years but quite the improvement from a range of 0.8% to -3.0% during 2001-2003. During the last ten years there has been a 49% correlation between the level of industrial metals&#39; prices and the y/y change in OECD Big Seven industrial production.
Inflation expectations as measured in the University of Michigan survey slipped from the highs in the June survey but the trend is clearly up. And in the market for Treasury securities, the so called TIPPS spread is down as well, but the trend remains elevated.
The Fed&#39;s Inflation Objective from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis can be found <a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/mt/20060701/cover.pdf"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/WEEKLY/@W4/@W4.HTM">Weekly Prices</a></th>
<th scope="col">06/20/06</th>
<th scope="col">12/27/05</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Light Sweet Crude Oil, WTI&nbsp; (per bbl.)</td>
<td>$68.94</td>
<td>$58.16</td>
<td>21.1%</td>
<td>$58.16</td>
<td>$41.78</td>
<td>$32.78</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">U.S. Retail Gasoline (per gallon)</td>
<td>$2.87</td>
<td>$2.20</td>
<td>32.9%</td>
<td>$2.27</td>
<td>$1.85</td>
<td>$1.56</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Gold: Handy &amp; Harmon (per Troy Oz., EOP)</td>
<td>$567.00</td>
<td>$507.40</td>
<td>30.3%</td>
<td>$507.40</td>
<td>$443.40</td>
<td>$416.25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">High Grade Copper (Comex, /Lb., EOP)</td>
<td>$3.29</td>
<td>$2.28</td>
<td>94.9%</td>
<td>$2.28</td>
<td>$1.54</td>
<td>$1.04</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Stainless Steel Scrap (/ton, EOP)</td>
<td>$2,158</td>
<td>$1,268</td>
<td>30.2%</td>
<td>$1,268</td>
<td>$1,558</td>
<td>$1,265</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Gold prices at $567.00 per ounce yesterday were more than 20% lower than their high during May. (Since 1980 there has been a 56% correlation between the level of gold prices and the y/y change in consumer prices.) In addition, the [...]

Gold Prices Crater, Oil Off a Bit But Inflation Pressure Up

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060621a.jpg" width="353">
The total number of mortgage applications dipped 0.8% last week after the 7.0% recovery the prior week. Through early June, applications were just 0.6% below the May average but were 27.9% below the year ago level.
Applications to refinance fell 2.2% last week following the 10.6% surge during the week prior. Refis in June were 1.7% below the May average and 43.1% below the year earlier level.
Purchase applications were unchanged from the prior week of the heels of a 4.8% jump. As a result purchase applications in early June were about even with the May average, but were 13.5% below the year ago level.
During the last ten years there has been a negative 80% correlation between 30-year mortgage interest rates and purchase applications while during those years there has been a 54% correlation between the y/y change in purchase applications and the change in new plus existing single family home sales.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060621b.jpg" width="353">
The effective interest rate on a conventional 30-year mortgage increased thirteen basis points to 6.96%. The rate on 15-year financing also rose ten basis points to 6.65%, its highest since April 2002. Interest rates on 15 and 30 year mortgages are closely correlated (&gt;90%) with the rate on 10 year Treasury securities and during the last ten years there has been a (negative) 82% correlation between purchase applications and the effective rate on a 30-Year mortgage.
The Mortgage Bankers Association surveys between 20 to 35 of the top lenders in the U.S. housing industry to derive its refinance, purchase and market indexes. The weekly survey accounts for more than 40% of all applications processed each week by mortgage lenders. Visit the Mortgage Bankers Association site <a href="http://www.mbaa.org">here</a>.
During 2006 sales of new single family homes have fallen 11.5% from the average level during 2005, a decline very much heralded by what has been an 11.7% drop in purchase applications this year versus last year&#39;s average. But construction starts so far in 2006 are down only 2.5% from the 2005 average.
The mismatch between the decline in sales and the decline in starts has resulted in a 15% rise in the number of new single family houses for sale YTD vs. the 2005 average. Measuring the increase in unsold new homes y/y results in a 27.0% increase. Increases by region y/y break down as follows: Northeast, +63.6%; South, +36.5%; West, +26.7%; Midwest, -3.6%. These figures are available in Haver&#39;s USECON database.
The inventory of unsold existing single family homes has risen a slightly faster 33.2% y/y. Year to date that inventory is up 11.2% and the months&#39; supply on the market is 5.9 times the current sales rate, versus 3.7 times in early 2005.
Adjusting to the Next Stage of the Housing Cycle is a recent speech by Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank President Jack Guynn and it can be found <a href="http://www.frbatlanta.org/invoke.cfm?objectid=AF005747-5056-9F1A-E28D889DADF9B34D&amp;method=display"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/SURVEYW/@S5/@S5.HTM">MBA Mortgage Applications (3/16/90=100)</a></th>
<th scope="col">06/16/06</th>
<th scope="col">06/09/06</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Total Market Index</td>
<td>567.6</td>
<td>571.9</td>
<td>-27.9%</td>
<td>708.6</td>
<td>735.1</td>
<td>1,067.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Purchase</td>
<td>414.8</td>
<td>414.6</td>
<td>-13.5%</td>
<td>470.9</td>
<td>454.5</td>
<td>395.1</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Refinancing</td>
<td>1,466.1</td>
<td>1,499.4</td>
<td>-43.1%</td>
<td>2,092.3</td>
<td>2,366.8</td>
<td>4,981.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

The total number of mortgage applications dipped 0.8% last week after the 7.0% recovery the prior week. Through early June, applications were just 0.6% below the May average but were 27.9% below the year ago level. Applications to [...]

Mortgage Applications Dip, # of Unsold Homes Soar

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060621a.jpg" width="353">
The total number of mortgage applications dipped 0.8% last week after the 7.0% recovery the prior week. Through early June, applications were just 0.6% below the May average but were 27.9% below the year ago level.
Applications to refinance fell 2.2% last week following the 10.6% surge during the week prior. Refis in June were 1.7% below the May average and 43.1% below the year earlier level.
Purchase applications were unchanged from the prior week of the heels of a 4.8% jump. As a result purchase applications in early June were about even with the May average, but were 13.5% below the year ago level.
During the last ten years there has been a negative 80% correlation between 30-year mortgage interest rates and purchase applications while during those years there has been a 54% correlation between the y/y change in purchase applications and the change in new plus existing single family home sales.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060621b.jpg" width="353">
The effective interest rate on a conventional 30-year mortgage increased thirteen basis points to 6.96%. The rate on 15-year financing also rose ten basis points to 6.65%, its highest since April 2002. Interest rates on 15 and 30 year mortgages are closely correlated (&gt;90%) with the rate on 10 year Treasury securities and during the last ten years there has been a (negative) 82% correlation between purchase applications and the effective rate on a 30-Year mortgage.
The Mortgage Bankers Association surveys between 20 to 35 of the top lenders in the U.S. housing industry to derive its refinance, purchase and market indexes. The weekly survey accounts for more than 40% of all applications processed each week by mortgage lenders. Visit the Mortgage Bankers Association site <a href="http://www.mbaa.org">here</a>.
During 2006 sales of new single family homes have fallen 11.5% from the average level during 2005, a decline very much heralded by what has been an 11.7% drop in purchase applications this year versus last year&#39;s average. But construction starts so far in 2006 are down only 2.5% from the 2005 average.
The mismatch between the decline in sales and the decline in starts has resulted in a 15% rise in the number of new single family houses for sale YTD vs. the 2005 average. Measuring the increase in unsold new homes y/y results in a 27.0% increase. Increases by region y/y break down as follows: Northeast, +63.6%; South, +36.5%; West, +26.7%; Midwest, -3.6%. These figures are available in Haver&#39;s USECON database.
The inventory of unsold existing single family homes has risen a slightly faster 33.2% y/y. Year to date that inventory is up 11.2% and the months&#39; supply on the market is 5.9 times the current sales rate, versus 3.7 times in early 2005.
Adjusting to the Next Stage of the Housing Cycle is a recent speech by Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank President Jack Guynn and it can be found <a href="http://www.frbatlanta.org/invoke.cfm?objectid=AF005747-5056-9F1A-E28D889DADF9B34D&amp;method=display"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/SURVEYW/@S5/@S5.HTM">MBA Mortgage Applications (3/16/90=100)</a></th>
<th scope="col">06/16/06</th>
<th scope="col">06/09/06</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Total Market Index</td>
<td>567.6</td>
<td>571.9</td>
<td>-27.9%</td>
<td>708.6</td>
<td>735.1</td>
<td>1,067.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Purchase</td>
<td>414.8</td>
<td>414.6</td>
<td>-13.5%</td>
<td>470.9</td>
<td>454.5</td>
<td>395.1</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Refinancing</td>
<td>1,466.1</td>
<td>1,499.4</td>
<td>-43.1%</td>
<td>2,092.3</td>
<td>2,366.8</td>
<td>4,981.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Japanese Business Confidence Diminishes Ahead of Possible Rate Hike 
by <a href="/comment/Stone.html">Carol Stone</a> June 21, 2006


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060621c.jpg" width="353">
<span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Verdana;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;MS Mincho&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;
mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:JA;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA">The recently instituted business survey by Japan&#39;s Ministry of Finance showed a distinct slowing in its second quarter results, reported today. The survey is just two years old, so there is obviously not much history. But these results hardly seem surprising with energy prices remaining high, and the Bank of Japan widely expected to engineer an increase in interest rates in the weeks ahead. <img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060621d.jpg" width="353">
The overall &quot;business conditions&quot; gauge dropped from 6.1% (balance, favorable less unfavorable) in Q1 to 1.8% in Q2. It had already retreated from 10.5% in Q4/2005. In the manufacturing sector, business conditions eased this quarter to 1.4% from 3.1% last period. 
In Q2, the responding firms assessed &quot;overseas demand&quot; as stronger than &quot;domestic demand&quot;. The domestic sector was rated positively for Q2 at a net +6.9% of firms, while overseas demand conditions stood at +9.5%. However, for the prior couple of quarters, the opposite was the case, as domestic activity was positive by double-digit amounts and higher than ratings on the foreign sector by 3 to 4 points. <img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060621e.jpg" width="353">
There is a hint in some of the associated detail, particularly sales, that Q2 may be subject to some seasonality; after companies rush to do business in the final quarter of their fiscal year, Q1 in Japan, the next quarter is something of a letdown. With so little history here, it&#39;s premature to make a conclusion about that, but it may help explain the Q2 slowdown. 
Meantime, one other aspect of the survey results really stood out. For the first time in this survey, selling prices had a positive reading. It&#39;s only +0.6%, but even so, it is still another sign that the deflationary period in Japan may have ended.Nonetheless, rising costs took a greater toll on profits, so after a couple of favorable quarters in that item, it dipped back into negative territory. 

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/JAPAN/@J8/@J8.HTM">JAPAN: Large Firms, </a> &nbsp;% Balance</th>
<th scope="col">Q2 2006 </th>
<th scope="col">Q1 2006 </th>
<th scope="col">Q4 2006 </th>
<th scope="col">Q2 2005 </th>
<th scope="col">Q2 2004 </th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Business Conditions </td>
<td>1.8</td>
<td>6.1</td>
<td>10.5</td>
<td>0.9</td>
<td>7.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Manufacturing </td>
<td>1.4</td>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>10.5</td>
<td>-2.4</td>
<td>8.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Domestic Demand </td>
<td>6.9</td>
<td>11.5</td>
<td>14.2</td>
<td>1.4</td>
<td>8.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Overseas Demand </td>
<td>9.5</td>
<td>8.0</td>
<td>10.2</td>
<td>4.1</td>
<td>12.2</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Selling Prices </td>
<td>0.6</td>
<td>-3.2</td>
<td>-2.2</td>
<td>-3.9</td>
<td>-5.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Gold Prices Crater, Oil Off a Bit But Inflation Pressure Up 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom Moeller</a> June 21, 2006


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060621g.jpg" width="353">
Gold prices at $567.00 per ounce yesterday were more than 20% lower than their high during May. (Since 1980 there has been a 56% correlation between the level of gold prices and the y/y change in consumer prices.)
In addition, the price of WTI crude oil at $68.94 per barrel is off 8% from the May high. These declines, however, seem more attributable to an easing of political tensions (Iran) than to some bona fide drop in inflation pressure. Measured price inflation is up, industrial commodity price inflation is up, inflation expectations are higher as well.
Consumer prices YTD have risen at a 5.2% annual rate in 2006 versus last year&#39;s 3.4% gain. The 3.1% rate of advance in &quot;core&quot; consumer price inflation is up from 3.3% growth last year, the 3.8% gain in core services prices is up one percentage point from last year and even the soft 1.2% rise in core goods prices is up from 0.5%.
The JoC-ECRI Industrial Metals Prices Index is up 25.2% this year due to higher prices for aluminum (up 35.4%), copper scrap (up 65.5%) and stainless steel scrap (up 17.6%). High grade copper prices have eased quite a bit from the earlier high but remain up 44.1% since year end &#39;05.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060621f.jpg" width="353">
Growth in industrial production is behind these gains. U.S. output gains have wobbled in recent months but factory production is up at a 3.9% annual rate this year, the same rate growth as during all of 2005. Output in the OECD Major Seven countries also is firm at 3.2% y/y through March. That&#39;s comparable to growth during the prior three years but quite the improvement from a range of 0.8% to -3.0% during 2001-2003. During the last ten years there has been a 49% correlation between the level of industrial metals&#39; prices and the y/y change in OECD Big Seven industrial production.
Inflation expectations as measured in the University of Michigan survey slipped from the highs in the June survey but the trend is clearly up. And in the market for Treasury securities, the so called TIPPS spread is down as well, but the trend remains elevated.
The Fed&#39;s Inflation Objective from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis can be found <a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/mt/20060701/cover.pdf"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/WEEKLY/@W4/@W4.HTM">Weekly Prices</a></th>
<th scope="col">06/20/06</th>
<th scope="col">12/27/05</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Light Sweet Crude Oil, WTI&nbsp; (per bbl.)</td>
<td>$68.94</td>
<td>$58.16</td>
<td>21.1%</td>
<td>$58.16</td>
<td>$41.78</td>
<td>$32.78</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">U.S. Retail Gasoline (per gallon)</td>
<td>$2.87</td>
<td>$2.20</td>
<td>32.9%</td>
<td>$2.27</td>
<td>$1.85</td>
<td>$1.56</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Gold: Handy &amp; Harmon (per Troy Oz., EOP)</td>
<td>$567.00</td>
<td>$507.40</td>
<td>30.3%</td>
<td>$507.40</td>
<td>$443.40</td>
<td>$416.25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">High Grade Copper (Comex, /Lb., EOP)</td>
<td>$3.29</td>
<td>$2.28</td>
<td>94.9%</td>
<td>$2.28</td>
<td>$1.54</td>
<td>$1.04</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Stainless Steel Scrap (/ton, EOP)</td>
<td>$2,158</td>
<td>$1,268</td>
<td>30.2%</td>
<td>$1,268</td>
<td>$1,558</td>
<td>$1,265</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Louise Curley

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060620f.jpg" width="353">
Italy&#39;s labor force survey for the first quarter shows commendable improvement in the employment situation throughout the country. Total employment rose almost 1% to 22.8 million in the first quarter from the last quarter of 2005 and was 1.2% above the first quarter or 2005. Employment in the North, where more than half the work force is employed, increased 1.2% over a year ago, while employment in the Central Region, where about 20% of the work force is employed, increased 1.9% over a year ago. Even in the depressed South, where almost 30% of the work force is employed, employment increased 0.6% above a year ago.Employment in the North and Central Regions has grown virtually steadily over the past five years while employment in the south has, more or less, stagnated. The first chart contrasts the trends in employment in the North and the South.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060620g.jpg" width="353">
The unemployment rate for the country as a whole was 7.4%, the lowest rate during the period for which data are available (Fourth quarter of 1992 to date). In the North the unemployment rate was 4.1%, in the central region, 6.1% and in the depressed south region, 13.6%. This last figure is also the lowest rate during the period for which data are available and is down from a peak of 19.7% in the second quarter of 1988.
Industrial orders for April rose 6.8% in the month and were 15.5% above a year ago. The big rise took place in export orders which rose 15.6% in the month and were 29.0% above a year ago. The increases in domestic orders were more subdued, 2.2% and 8.7%, respectively. The second chart shows the indexes (2000=100) for domestic and export orders.
Industrial sales declined in April from March, but were 5.7% above April, 2005. Domestic sales were 4.6% and foreign sales, 8.2% above their respective April, 2005 values. 

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">Italy</th>
<th scope="col">Apr&nbsp; 06</th>
<th scope="col">Mar 05</th>
<th scope="col">Apr 05</th>
<th scope="col">M/M</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Industrial Orders (2000=100)&nbsp;</td>
<td>115.0</td>
<td>107.7</td>
<td>99.6</td>
<td>6.78</td>
<td>15.46</td>
<td>102.0</td>
<td>98.9</td>
<td>95.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Domestic</td>
<td>105.</td>
<td>102.7</td>
<td>96.6</td>
<td>2.24</td>
<td>8.70</td>
<td>98.9</td>
<td>96.8</td>
<td>93.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Foreign</td>
<td>137.5</td>
<td>119.0</td>
<td>106.6</td>
<td>15.55</td>
<td>25.99</td>
<td>111.6</td>
<td>103.6</td>
<td>98.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Industrial Sales (2000=100)&nbsp;</td>
<td>112.8</td>
<td>115.0</td>
<td>106.7</td>
<td>-1.91</td>
<td>5.72</td>
<td>107.6</td>
<td>104.1</td>
<td>101.8</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Domestic</td>
<td>110.9</td>
<td>112.8</td>
<td>106.0</td>
<td>-1.68</td>
<td>4.62</td>
<td>106.4</td>
<td>104.1</td>
<td>101.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Foreign</td>
<td>117.7</td>
<td>120.8</td>
<td>108.8</td>
<td>-2.57</td>
<td>8.18</td>
<td>110.8</td>
<td>104.1</td>
<td>101.4&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol"></td>
<td>Q1 06</td>
<td>Q4 05</td>
<td>Q1 05</td>
<td>Q/Q</td>
<td>Y/Y</td>
<td>20 05</td>
<td>2004</td>
<td>2003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Employment (thousands)</td>
<td>22,814</td>
<td>22,598</td>
<td>22,549</td>
<td>0.96</td>
<td>1.18</td>
<td>22,571</td>
<td>22,404</td>
<td>22,240</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">North</td>
<td>11,687</td>
<td>11,601</td>
<td>11,546</td>
<td>0.74</td>
<td>1.22</td>
<td>11,591</td>
<td>11,433</td>
<td>11,364</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Central</td>
<td>4,655</td>
<td>45-,594</td>
<td>4,567</td>
<td>1.32</td>
<td>1.93</td>
<td>4,577</td>
<td>4,539</td>
<td>4,424</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">South</td>
<td>6,472</td>
<td>6,403</td>
<td>6,436</td>
<td>1.08</td>
<td>0.56</td>
<td>6,414</td>
<td>6,431</td>
<td>6,452</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Unemployment Rate</td>
<td>7.4</td>
<td>7.7</td>
<td>7.8</td>
<td>-0.3</td>
<td>-0.4</td>
<td>7.7</td>
<td>8.8</td>
<td>8.4</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">North</td>
<td>4.1</td>
<td>4.3</td>
<td>4.3</td>
<td>-0.2</td>
<td>-0.2</td>
<td>4.2</td>
<td>4.3</td>
<td>4.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Central</td>
<td>6.1</td>
<td>6.6</td>
<td>6.3</td>
<td>-0.5</td>
<td>-0.2</td>
<td>6.4</td>
<td>6.5</td>
<td>6.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">South</td>
<td>13.6</td>
<td>14.0</td>
<td>14.5</td>
<td>-0.4</td>
<td>-0.9</td>
<td>14.3</td>
<td>14.9</td>
<td>16.1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Italy's labor force survey for the first quarter shows commendable improvement in the employment situation throughout the country. Total employment rose almost 1% to 22.8 million in the first quarter from the last quarter of 2005 and [...]

Employment Situation in Italy Improves: Foreign New Orders up Sharply

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>

 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060620e.jpg" width="353">
The International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC)-UBS reported that chain store sales were stable last week following a 1.2% surge during the prior week.
Sales so far in June are 0.2% below the May average which fell 0.4% from April. During the last ten years there has been a 47% correlation between the y/y change in chain store sales and the change in nonauto retail sales less gasoline.
The ICSC-UBS retail chain-store sales index is constructed using the same-store sales (stores open for one year) reported by 78 stores of seven retailers: Dayton Hudson, Federated, Kmart, May, J.C. Penney, Sears and Wal-Mart.
The leading indicator of chain store sales from ICSC-UBS recovered another 1.0% (-2.2% y/y), up for the third week after several consecutive weeks of decline.
Retail gasoline prices fell four cents last week to an average $2.87 per gallon and reversed most of the increase during the prior two weeks. In spot market trading gasoline prices fell a nickel yesterday to $1.93 per gallon and were down a bit more than that from last week&#39;s average $1.99.
The just-released 2006 International Energy Outlook from the U.S. Energy Information Administration is available <a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/index.html"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/surveyw/@S2/@S2.HTM">ICSC-UBS (SA, 1977=100)</a></th>
<th scope="col">06/17/06</th>
<th scope="col">06/10/06</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Total Weekly Chain Store Sales</td>
<td>473.6</td>
<td>473.6</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
<td>3.6%</td>
<td>4.7%</td>
<td>2.9%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>


</html>

The International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC)-UBS reported that chain store sales were stable last week following a 1.2% surge during the prior week. Sales so far in June are 0.2% below the May average which fell 0.4% from [...]

Chain Store Sales Stable As Gas Prices Fell

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060620d.jpg" width="353">
The National Association of Home Builders&#39; (NAHB) reported that the June Composite Housing Market Index at 45 fell another 8.7% from May to the lowest level since April 1995. The figure matched Consensus expectations.
During the last twenty years there has been a 75% correlation between the y/y change in the Composite Index and the change in single family housing starts.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/060620c.jpg" width="353">
The sub indexes covering current sales of single family homes (-39.0% y/y) and sales in the next six months (-37.5% y/y) were both down sharply m/m.
An index of the traffic of prospective home buyers dried up and fell 12.1% m/m (-47.3% y/y).
Housing markets around the country again were weak in June with the index for the Northeast off 14.9% (-43.7% y/y), in the Midwest off 13.8% (-51.9% y/y), out West down 1.6% (-31.5% y/y) and in the South off 3.9% (-36.4% y/y).
The NAHB index is a diffusion index based on a survey of builders. Readings above 50 signal that more builders view conditions as good than poor.
Visit the <a href="http://www.nahb.org">National Association of Home Builders</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/SURVEYS/@S4/@S4.HTM">Nat&#39;l Association of Home Builders</a> </th>
<th scope="col">June</th>
<th scope="col">May</th>
<th scope="col">June &#39;05</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Composite Housing Market Index</td>
<td>45</td>
<td>51</td>
<td>70</td>
<td>67</td>
<td>68</td>
<td>64</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

The National Association of Home Builders' (NAHB) reported that the June Composite Housing Market Index at 45 fell another 8.7% from May to the lowest level since April 1995. The figure matched Consensus expectations. During the last [...]

NAHB Housing Market Index Down Again

Surging orders for computers and electronics propelling durable goods orders

Next year's inflation forecasts are on the rise and above target

Disrupted global supply chains placing upward pressure on US goods prices

Construction of data centers has overtaken transportation construction in US

Elevated energy prices putting intense upward pressure on input prices around the globe

US is big leader in global surge in private AI investment

Larger-than-usual income tax refunds this year are supporting consumer spending

Sharply rising share of AI-related jobs

Inflationary impact of surge in oil prices larger in Europe than in the US

Futures market thinks the price of oil will recede significantly over the next six months

Recent pickup in US defense orders could help support overall growth ahead

Cost of transporting crude oil has soared to series high

Market-based inflation expectations have not yet reflected recent surge in oil prices

Global equity markets are fearing a major economic disruption from soaring oil prices

Is recent drop in sentiment signaling softer growth ahead?

With the Iran conflict, geopolitical risk has soared to alarming levels

Soaring AI-related investment in US underpinning strong contribution of business spending to overall growth

AI-related outperformance of IP in Advanced Asia ex Japan

Resilient US economy pushing up Blue Chip 2026 outlook

US and China big leaders in adoption of AI models

Robust US demand for advanced technology products

China's export growth rotating away from the US

More pronounced upward revisions in countries more exposed to AI investment

Stable job openings and hiring rates point to cautious hiring

Global freight costs are on the rise while supply chain pressures are contained

Our global data offering is unparalleled in terms of coverage, quality, and organization. We offer 290+ databases from 2500 government and private sources, a wealth of key survey and forecast data covering the world’s economies, and a robust offering of archive databases that drive machine learning for big data applications.

Optimized for precision analytics, our data is seamlessly integrated with Microsoft Office and all leading statistical packages through our DLX® software and platform independent HaverView™ website. We further offer direct database feeds, client server or cloud-based delivery, and RESTful API.


Privacy Policy

Disclaimer

Contact us

Service Health

A premier time series data platform for the global strategy, research, and quant communities. 

New York

London

Singapore

Tokyo

Economy in Brief

Viewpoints

Contact Us

Our Data

Our Products

What We Do

Our Authors

About Us

Data News

Featured Data Additions

Resources

Release Calendars

Training Center

Webinars

Newsletters

Download Software

For Clients

Live Updates

Sandy Batten

260629X20.jpg

260629Y20.jpg

Total job openings edged up 0.1% m/m (+3.9% y/y) to 7.594 million in May from a downwardly revised 7.585 million in April (previously 7.618 million), according to the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Even with only a small rise, the level of openings in May was the highest since May 2024. Accordingly, the job openings rate (the ratio of openings to nonfarm employment plus openings) was unchanged at 4.6% in May. The April and May readings for the job openings rate were the highest since November 2024. In May, the number of unemployed fell while the number of openings edged up. Consequently, the number of openings rose further above the number of unemployed for the second consecutive month, another sign that previously observed softening in labor market conditions may be reversing.

Private sector openings were essentially unchanged in May from April, edging up 2,000 (+4.3% y/y) with the private job openings rate unchanged at 4.8%. The sluggishness in private openings in May was due entirely to a 119,000 decline in private education and health care openings. However, this followed a total increase of 298,000 in March and April. Openings increased in all other major sectors, led by a 95,000 increase in openings in leisure and hospitality. Openings were up 32,000 in construction, 33,000 in manufacturing, and 37,000 in trade and transportation. Total government openings rose 7,000 in May after an upwardly revised 63,000 jump in April (previously +47,000).

Total hiring slipped 0.9% m/m (-3.0% y/y) to 5.170 million in May from an upwardly revised 5.215 million in April (previously 5.116 million). This was the third monthly decline in hiring in the past four months. The hiring rate was unchanged in May at 3.3%. Private sector hiring fell 1.6% m/m (-3.5% y/y) in May, also the third monthly decline in the past four months. The weakness in hiring in May was concentrated in trade and transportation (-56,000) and in construction (-24,000). Manufacturing posted a small decline while professional and business services, and private education and health care posted small increases. Leisure and hospitality hiring rose 15,000, the second monthly increase in the past three months. Total government hiring increased 32,000 in May.

Total separations increased 1.3% (-3.5% y/y) to 5.101 million in May from an upwardly revised 5.038 million in April (previously 4.978 million). Both quits (+22,000) and layoffs (+41,000) increased in May with no change in other separations. The separation rate in May was unchanged at 3.2%. Private separations also rose 1.3% m/m (+62,000, -2.9% y/y) in May. Private quits increased 37,000, private layoffs rose 27,000, while other private separations declined 2,000. The rise in private layoffs was concentrated in construction (+47,000), trade and transportation (+52,000), and private education and healthcare (+52,000). Layoffs declined 18,000 in manufacturing, fell 37,000 in professional and business services, and decreased 50,000 in leisure and hospitality. Even with the rise in private quits in May, they have been trending down in 2026, implying that workers are feeling less comfortable with their employment prospects and hence are choosing to remain in their current jobs.

On the whole, employers remain cautious in hiring. Furthermore, workers are sufficiently unsure of their alternative employment prospects that they are refraining from leaving their current position. Still, openings have gradually risen since the end of last year after having gradually fallen throughout 202 and once again exceed the number of unemployed.

The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) data are available in Haver’s **USECON** database.

- Openings edged up 9,000 but to the highest level since May 2024.
- However, hiring fell 45,000 for the third monthly decline in the past four months.
- Separations rose 63,000 with increases in both quits and layoffs.

U.S. JOLTS: Openings and Hiring Little Changed in May

Robert Brusca

260629E.jpg

Headline indexes for the European Monetary Union improved in June to a reading of 95.0 from 93.7 in May. The index had been stronger at 96.4 in March; however, it fell to 93.3 in April, recovered slightly to 93.7 in May, and has now reached 95.0. While still below its March high, the index has made progress in the wake of the outbreak of war-like conditions and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

**Sector performance**
The industrial reading for the sector, at -8, has a 36.3 percentile standing, which better than the headline index for the Monetary Union with a 25.4 percentile standing. The EMU-wide sector index, consumer confidence, improved to a net diffusion reading of -17.7 in June from -19 in May, but that still leaves it with a very weak 8.1 percentile standing, the lowest among sector readings. Retailing improved to a net diffusion reading of -10 in June from -11 in May and posted a 38.1 percentile standing. The construction sector deteriorated, falling back to -5 from -4 in May; it has been undergoing steady degradation since at least March, but it still has a 68.4 percentile standing. It is the only sector with a percentile standing above 50, placing it above its historic median. The services sector had a net diffusion reading of +3, identical to its May reading and has a 24-percentile standing.

**Sector index ranking**
The sector readings clearly show that the monetary union is exhibiting a number of sectors with subpar growth; beyond ‘subpar,’ many are quite weak. The exception is—and has been for some time—the construction sector, which continues to perform above average and post an above-median metric. It is, perhaps surprising that we often think of consumer confidence as being relatively forward-looking, but in this schematic, consumer confidence is the weakest of the sectors; in fact, like statistics from the U.S., we find the same prevailing situation with consumer readings exceptionally weak. These weak consumer readings coexist with much stronger retailing readings and stronger industrial readings, although both of those are below their historic medians in Europe. This report is a sort of gut check for what consumer confidence means; it may not be as important as we used to think it was. Although the business cycle at this juncture seems to be concentrated more on the supply side and on recovery in the business community, that effect compounded by the influence of AI is much stronger in the U.S. than in Europe.

**Country detail – Large economies**
The country detail shows 16 of 20 early reporting countries with only one of the top four countries showing a decline month-to-month, and that's France. France recorded a 0.2% decline in June, while Germany posted a 1.9% increase, Italy gained 1.3%, and Spain rose 0.7%. Spain had the lone small decrease in May, while in April all of the large countries showed significant monthly declines in their overall indexes in the wake of the onset of the war with Iran.

**Smaller economies in EMU**
Apart from the Big Four economies, 12 other EMU members report in June; of those, 5 showed month-to-month declines in their country level indexes. This was up from three showing declines in May, although it was a vast improvement from April, when all of the country indexes turned negative and generated substantial month-to-month declines, except for Slovakia and Lithuania.

**Big Four economy rankings**
Among the Big Four economies, the strongest ranking reading in June is Spain at a 52.3 percentile standing, followed by Italy at a 41.6 percentile standing, France at a 22.7 percentile standing, and Germany at an 18.7 percentile standing.

**Other economy rankings**
Among the other 12 countries, the percentile standing readings range from a high of 76.1% for Greece to a low of 9.3% for Austria. Five of 12 of the smaller EMU members have percentile standings of 50% or greater, putting them above their historic medians, while the other 7 have rankings that range from a high of 44.6% in Portugal to a low of 9.3% in Austria.

**Summing up**
Conditions in the monetary union have improved over the last two months after a substantial stumble in the wake of the war in the Middle East with Iran and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. However, the rebound in the European recovery is in gear; it is slow and measured. Conditions are still weak on balance.

260629.jpg

Europe

EU Indexes Show European Improvement in June

Tian Yong Woon

In this week's Letter, we explore the significant pullback in oil prices that followed the US-Iran memorandum of understanding and consider its broader economic implications. The agreement saw a fragile ceasefire ensue and a gradual resumption of shipping flows through the Strait of Hormuz (chart 1). We acknowledge that this major pullback will certainly be welcome to policymakers across the region and beyond. Previously elevated energy prices had added to the fiscal burdens of governments and sharpened the dilemma facing central banks (chart 2). That dilemma pits the need to rein in inflation against the risk of choking off economic growth. That said, while one source of inflationary pressure seems to be ebbing, another looks to be emerging on the horizon. It stems from a potential "Super El Niño" event, which meteorologists have been warning about for some time now. Asia sits at the centre of such risks, as past strong El Niño events have directly and adversely affected crop production (chart 3). The impact is not limited to potential surges in headline inflation via food supply shocks, especially in Asia. It extends directly to growth as well (chart 4), given the nontrivial share of GDP that agriculture still commands in many Asian economies (chart 5). Should price pressures simply rotate from energy to food, government subsidies may follow suit (chart 6). Central bankers, for their part, may find themselves unable to ease off the tightening pedal just yet. Some Asian economies, however, would still manage to offset such a growth shock through other engines. Electronics and semiconductors, buoyed by the current AI upcycle, offer one such cushion for the more fortunate. For others, lacking such offsets, the agricultural hit may simply have to be borne in full.

**The US-Iran conflict and oil prices**
The recent memorandum of understanding between the US and Iran, aimed at working towards a final deal, has already brought visible relief to crude oil markets (chart 1). This relief has held despite the renewed tensions that have followed the agreement, which markets seem to have largely looked past. The easing in prices should go a long way towards unwinding the inflation concerns that elevated oil prices had previously stoked. Much of the pullback reflects anticipation of the substantial supply now expected to return to global markets. Yet some shipping trackers, such as the IMF's, already point to a marked pickup in traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. Even so, those volumes still remain well below the levels seen before the conflict began in the region. 

260629T1.jpg

**Oil prices and inflation in Asia**
Should this normalisation of shipping flows through the Strait of Hormuz persist, it would support a corresponding easing in oil prices and energy inflation. That moderation in energy costs would, in turn, help bring down broader headline inflation across the economy. As chart 2 shows, energy has been a large contributor to headline inflation in recent years, though other important forces have been at play too. Such an outcome, in which restored oil supply cools energy inflation, would be a welcome development for central bankers. They face the delicate task of reining in price pressures without tightening policy so far that growth stalls or tips into contraction. That said, while one driver of price pressures now seems to be ebbing, albeit not without the risk of renewed tensions, another source of inflation is building on the horizon.

260629T2.jpg

**Risks of a “Super El Niño”**
As meteorological agencies have warned for some time, the world may be on the cusp of a Super El Niño. The probability of such an event has risen sharply in recent months. Were it to materialise, it would unleash a range of disruptions from the second half of this year, chief among them shifts in weather and climate patterns that can severely dent crop yields. Asian staples such as rice, wheat and palm oil are especially exposed, since strong El Niño events tend to bring drier conditions and reduced rainfall, in turn cutting output across affected economies in the region. Chart 3 illustrates just how tightly some crops are bound to these conditions: SOI readings correlate closely with certain economies' production, notably Thailand's rice harvest, underscoring how dependent such output remains on the weather. These supply shortfalls would then feed inflationary pressures through the food channel. So central bankers may not be able to rest entirely easy following the easing of tensions between the US and Iran, finding themselves wrestling with a fresh set of emerging inflation risks instead.

260629T3.jpg

Delving deeper, an examination of recent strong El Niño episodes against the growth of Asian economies' agricultural sectors shows that extreme weather weighs not just on food prices but on economic growth itself. As chart 4 shows, previous major El Niño episodes—notably in 2014–16 and 2023–24—were associated with weaker agricultural growth across parts of Asia, with India and Thailand appearing particularly vulnerable. This is understandable, since these episodes coincided with reduced crop production and, in turn, lower crop revenue. Should these past episodes serve as a gauge and given that the coming event is potentially the worst on record, these economies stand to suffer once more should it hit as hard as feared.

260629T4.jpg

Beyond the sensitivity of individual economies to extreme El Niño events, vulnerability also depends on the size of the agricultural sector itself. Economies where agriculture accounts for a larger share of output are naturally more exposed to weather-related disruptions. As chart 5 shows, economies such as India, Indonesia and, to a lesser extent, Vietnam carry a comparatively higher share of agriculture in their GDP, which presents a further source of risk. That said, this dimension should not be read in isolation, since the eventual impact would turn on a combination of factors: the degree of exposure, the intensity of El Niño's effect on each economy's agricultural output, and the actual weather conditions that come to pass.

260629T5.jpg

Bringing it all together, the recent de-escalation between the US and Iran and the early normalisation of flows through the Strait of Hormuz are certainly welcome news. Businesses, consumers and policymakers alike stand to benefit from the relief that lower energy prices would bring. Yet the formation of extreme El Niño conditions presents a looming inflation risk over the months ahead. It may displace energy as the dominant driver, shifting the pressure from the energy channel to the food channel. For Asia's central bankers, this could mean they are unable to ease off the tightening pedal just yet (chart 6). Food inflation may simply pick up where energy inflation leaves off, keeping price pressures elevated for longer. Regional governments, too, may have to redirect funds from energy subsidies to food subsidies should the supply shock play out. On growth, however, the picture may prove more uneven across the region than a single narrative suggests. Economies exposed to the current AI upcycle could keep leaning on those sectors for continued support. Those less exposed, by contrast, may simply have to absorb the hit to agriculture with little to offset it.

260629T6.jpg

Asia

Economic Letter from Asia: Oil Down, Emerging Risks

Winnie Tapasanun

260625H9.jpg

260625I9.jpg

The U.S. international trade deficit in goods ballooned to a larger-than-expected $105.75 billion in May after narrowing to $83.01 billion in April, according to the advance estimate from the U.S. Census Bureau. The May reading marked the third widening in the goods trade deficit in four months, exceeding a $91.55 billion shortfall in May 2025. A deficit of $84.0 billion for May had been expected by the Action Economics Forecast Survey. The deficit reached a low of $61.44 billion in October 2025 (the smallest since February 2020) and a record high of $158.73 billion in March 2025. On a quarterly basis, the deficit averaged $94.38 billion so far in Q2'26 versus $81.96 billion in Q1'26.

Total goods exports fell 5.4% m/m (+14.7% y/y) to $207.67 billion in May, the first monthly fall since December and a three-month low, following a 3.8% rise to a record-high $219.52 billion in April. Exports were up 27.7% from a June 2023 low. The m/m fall in exports in May reflected declines of 9.2% (-5.0% y/y) in nonfood consumer goods excluding autos, 7.0% (+23.2% y/y) in industrial supplies & materials, 6.8% (+19.5% y/y) in other goods, and 5.0% (+14.8% y/y) in capital goods excluding autos. To the upside, exports of foods, feeds & beverages (+3.9%; +19.1% y/y) and automotive vehicles & parts (+0.5%; -3.6% y/y) rebounded m/m in May.

Total goods imports, up for the fourth consecutive month, rose 3.6% m/m (15.0% y/y) to $313.43 billion in May, after a 2.0% increase to $302.53 billion in April, marking the highest level since the March 2025 record high of $340.11 billion. Imports were up 25.0% from a March 2023 low. The m/m rise in imports in May was broad-based across all end-use categories, led by an 11.5% gain (22.0% y/y) in other goods, followed by increases of 6.3% (1.4% y/y) in automotive vehicles & parts, 5.7% (-9.1% y/y) in nonfood consumer goods excluding autos, 4.8% (11.7% y/y) in industrial supplies & materials, 4.3% (-0.2% y/y) in foods, feeds & beverages, and 0.4% (41.9% y/y) in capital goods excluding autos. 

The advance international trade data can be found in Haver's **USECON** database. The expectation figure is from the Action Economics Forecast Survey, which is in **AS1REPNA**.

- Deficit: $105.75 bil. in May, up $22.75 bil. (+27.4%) from April’s $83.01 bil.
- Exports -5.4%, first m/m decline since Dec., led by a 9.2% drop in nonauto consumer goods exports.
- Imports +3.6%, fourth straight m/m rise to highest level since Mar. ’25, driven by an 11.5% gain in imports of other goods.

U.S. Goods Trade Deficit Balloons in May, Largest Since March ’25

260626E.jpg

In June, there's a slight divergence in the performance of industry climate and service sector climate, although broadly the two sectors have seen their composite indexes moving in more or less the same direction. Since 2024, the industry survey has moved up slightly after falling faster than the services gauge. The services survey has been locked in a slow trend of deterioration, largely since it reached a peak in 2021 in the wake of COVID.

The industry climate gauge has a 30.8 percentile standing, but the recent production trend, while declining, logs a more substantial 42.8 percentile standing. Contributing survey members find their own industry ‘likely trend’ much weaker, at a 21.2 percentile standing. Demand overall, however, has standings above the 50th percentile, putting overall and foreign orders & demand each above their respective medians for this period of ranking back to 2001. Inventories have a strong 81-percentile ranking. Prices are extremely strong, with 87-percentile and 86-percentile standings for respondents for their personal industry trend for prices as well as for the overarching manufacturing sector estimate of prices. Higher prices seem to be the one thing that everyone can agree on by a large margin.

260626.jpg

As for services, the service climate index improved slightly to 93.4 in June from 92.6 in May. The three-month moving average was weaker in June than in May as well; the 12-month moving average has been stuck at its current level for a number of months. The outlook in June improved slightly to a reading of -12 from -15 in May, but the outlook ranking is still a weak 26.8 percentile standing. The three-month expectations and observations of past sales trends haven't changed much in the last two months, but there has been a slight improvement for sales expectations. However, both sales metrics have low 20th percentile standings. Sales prices have deteriorated slightly in June compared to May for both the observed and the expected trends, but prices have standings above their 50th percentiles, logging above-median performance. Employment over the last three months has weakened noticeably, and expected employment is weaker by a small amount.

In terms of rankings, all of the sector rankings are below the 50th percentile on all of these observations, including the climate headline except for sales prices where both the past three-month observed trend and the expected trend have readings above their respective 50th percentiles, indicating past and expected price pressures in excess of normal.

260626 2.jpg

**Assessment**
On balance, the readings for the French industry, manufacturing sector and services are not encouraging. In addition, concerns about prices linger. The services sector, those concerns seem moderate compared to the concerns in manufacturing.

The hot war continues between Ukraine and Russia, while in the Middle East there was talk of some improvement and a potential peace deal between the United States and Iran, but every time there is some talk of a breakthrough, there appears to be a breakdown. In the most recent development, Iran has asserted its right to control traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, and it's not clear how that demand would ever be consistent with the U.S. allowing a ceasefire. It appears that Iran may have traded its irreconcilable demand for nuclear weapons for a more pragmatic and real-world argument—that it will control the traffic through the Strait of Hormuz simply because it can—and it still is doing exactly that, even after all the destruction it suffered.

Stopping Iran from controlling the Strait would take a commitment to restart the war. All this makes me personally more pessimistic. I think Iran sees the need for Trump to cut a deal and stop the war before the U.S. mid-term elections, and it is pressing that need to its advantage. Trading its nuclear ambitions for real world control of the Strait would elevate Iran’s power from being dangerous but ethereal to a real world event with constant consequences.

Economy in Brief

Jump to:

Initial Claims for Unemployment Insurance Up Slightly

Japanese Business Confidence Diminishes Ahead of Possible Rate Hike

Gold Prices Crater, Oil Off a Bit But Inflation Pressure Up

Mortgage Applications Dip, # of Unsold Homes Soar

Mortgage Applications Dip, # of Unsold Homes Soar

Employment Situation in Italy Improves: Foreign New Orders up Sharply

Chain Store Sales Stable As Gas Prices Fell

NAHB Housing Market Index Down Again