Tom Moeller

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070110d.jpg" width="353">
The total number of mortgage applications surged 16.6% last week, the strongest weekly increase since June 2005 according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.
Purchase applications jumped 16.2% and raised the level of applications in early January 11.3% above the December average which rose 4.7% from November.
During the last ten years there has been a 58% correlation between the y/y change in purchase applications and the change in new plus existing single family home sales.
Applications to refinance also were strong and jumped 17.2%. Applications to refinance in early January were 1.2% above the December average which was unchanged from November.
The effective interest rate on a conventional 30-year mortgage fell w/w to 6.32% but remained up slightly from the December average of 6.28%. The peak for 30 year financing was 7.08% late in June. Rates for 15-year financing also fell sharply to 6.10%. Interest rates on 15 and 30 year mortgages are closely correlated (&gt;90%) with the rate on 10 year Treasury securities.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070110c.jpg" width="353">
During the last ten years there has been a (negative) 79% correlation between the level of applications for purchase and the effective interest rate on a 30-year mortgage.
The Mortgage Bankers Association surveys between 20 to 35 of the top lenders in the U.S. housing industry to derive its refinance, purchase and market indexes. The weekly survey covers roughly 50% of all U.S. residential mortgage applications processed each week by mortgage banks, commercial banks and thrifts. Visit the Mortgage Bankers Association site <a href="http://www.mbaa.org">here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/SURVEYW/@S5/@S5.HTM">MBA Mortgage Applications (3/16/90=100)</a></th>
<th scope="col">01/05/07</th>
<th scope="col">12/29/06</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Total Market Index</td>
<td>671.1</td>
<td>575.6</td>
<td>11.8%</td>
<td>584.2</td>
<td>708.6</td>
<td>735.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Purchase</td>
<td>472.8</td>
<td>406.9</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
<td>406.9</td>
<td>470.9</td>
<td>454.5</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Refinancing</td>
<td>1,923.8</td>
<td>1,640.4</td>
<td>28.5%</td>
<td>1,634.0</td>
<td>2,092.3</td>
<td>2,366.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

The total number of mortgage applications surged 16.6% last week, the strongest weekly increase since June 2005 according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. Purchase applications jumped 16.2% and raised the level of applications in [...]

Mortgage Applications Surged

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070110b.jpg" width="353">
The U.S. foreign trade deficit narrowed unexpectedly in November to $58.2B from a little revised $58.8B during October. The deficit was the shallowest since July of last year and compared to Consensus expectations for a deficit of $60.0B.
The value of petroleum product imports fell 9.3% (-11.2% y/y) as the per barrel cost of crude oil petroleum imports fell 5.8% m/m to $52.25 and the quantity of crude oil imports fell 0.8% (-4.7% y/y).
Imports of nonpetroleum products rose 0.3% (7.8% y/y) after two months of decline. Capital goods imports rose 0.9% (10.7% y/y) and imports of nonauto consumer goods surged 2.3% (15.0% y/y), the strongest monthly gain since June. Imports of advanced technology products rose 0.4% (14.2% y/y).
Total exports rose a strong 0.9% goosed by a 1.9% (13.0% y/y) rise in capital goods exports. Exports of complete civilian aircraft jumped 15.7% (36.9% y/y) and aircraft parts &amp; engines exports also rose a strong 7.9% (19.2% y/y). Computer exports slipped 6.3% (+16.1% y/y) and exports of nonauto consumer goods rose 1.4% (13.5% y/y) after October&#39;s 3.7% jump.
Service exports jumped another 1.4% (9.8% y/y) as travel exports surged 2.6% (11.8% y/y) and passenger fares jumped 2.9% (6.5% y/y). Imports of services also rose a strong 0.9% (9.0% y/y) reflecting a 2.7% (12.5% y/y) rise in travel and a 3.9% jump in passenger fares (6.0% y/y).<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070110a.jpg" width="353">
The U.S. trade deficit in goods with China narrowed slightly to $22.9B in November ($201.5B in 2005) as imports fell s sharp 5.2% (+23.9% y/y). The balance of goods trade with the newly industrialized Asian also narrowed to a deficit $0.4B (-$15.8B in 2005), the smallest since March of last year, as exports surged 6.5% (33.2% y/y) and imports fell 6.2% (+0.8% y/y).
The trade deficit with Europe deepened slightly m/m to $9.5B as US exports fell 1.1% (+14.6% y/y) and imports slipped 0.6% (+1.4%% y/y).
China&#39;s Strategic Petroleum Reserve: A Drop in the Bucket from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis can be found <a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/net/20070101/cover.pdf"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@EE/@EE01/@EE01.HTM">Foreign Trade&nbsp;</a></th>
<th scope="col">November</th>
<th scope="col">October</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">U.S. Trade Deficit</td>
<td>$58.2B</td>
<td>$58.8B</td>
<td>$64.0B (11/05)</td>
<td>$716.7B</td>
<td>$611.3B</td>
<td>$494.9B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Exports - Goods &amp; Services</td>
<td>0.9%</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
<td>13.4%</td>
<td>10.7%</td>
<td>13.4%</td>
<td>4.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Imports - Goods &amp; Services</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
<td>-2.7%</td>
<td>5.2%</td>
<td>13.0%</td>
<td>16.7%</td>
<td>8.3%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

The U.S. foreign trade deficit narrowed unexpectedly in November to $58.2B from a little revised $58.8B during October. The deficit was the shallowest since July of last year and compared to Consensus expectations for a deficit of [...]

U.S. Trade Deficit Narrowed Unexpectedly

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070110b.jpg" width="353">
The U.S. foreign trade deficit narrowed unexpectedly in November to $58.2B from a little revised $58.8B during October. The deficit was the shallowest since July of last year and compared to Consensus expectations for a deficit of $60.0B.
The value of petroleum product imports fell 9.3% (-11.2% y/y) as the per barrel cost of crude oil petroleum imports fell 5.8% m/m to $52.25 and the quantity of crude oil imports fell 0.8% (-4.7% y/y).
Imports of nonpetroleum products rose 0.3% (7.8% y/y) after two months of decline. Capital goods imports rose 0.9% (10.7% y/y) and imports of nonauto consumer goods surged 2.3% (15.0% y/y), the strongest monthly gain since June. Imports of advanced technology products rose 0.4% (14.2% y/y).
Total exports rose a strong 0.9% goosed by a 1.9% (13.0% y/y) rise in capital goods exports. Exports of complete civilian aircraft jumped 15.7% (36.9% y/y) and aircraft parts &amp; engines exports also rose a strong 7.9% (19.2% y/y). Computer exports slipped 6.3% (+16.1% y/y) and exports of nonauto consumer goods rose 1.4% (13.5% y/y) after October&#39;s 3.7% jump.
Service exports jumped another 1.4% (9.8% y/y) as travel exports surged 2.6% (11.8% y/y) and passenger fares jumped 2.9% (6.5% y/y). Imports of services also rose a strong 0.9% (9.0% y/y) reflecting a 2.7% (12.5% y/y) rise in travel and a 3.9% jump in passenger fares (6.0% y/y).<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070110a.jpg" width="353">
The U.S. trade deficit in goods with China narrowed slightly to $22.9B in November ($201.5B in 2005) as imports fell s sharp 5.2% (+23.9% y/y). The balance of goods trade with the newly industrialized Asian also narrowed to a deficit $0.4B (-$15.8B in 2005), the smallest since March of last year, as exports surged 6.5% (33.2% y/y) and imports fell 6.2% (+0.8% y/y).
The trade deficit with Europe deepened slightly m/m to $9.5B as US exports fell 1.1% (+14.6% y/y) and imports slipped 0.6% (+1.4%% y/y).
China&#39;s Strategic Petroleum Reserve: A Drop in the Bucket from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis can be found <a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/net/20070101/cover.pdf"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@EE/@EE01/@EE01.HTM">Foreign Trade&nbsp;</a></th>
<th scope="col">November</th>
<th scope="col">October</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">U.S. Trade Deficit</td>
<td>$58.2B</td>
<td>$58.8B</td>
<td>$64.0B (11/05)</td>
<td>$716.7B</td>
<td>$611.3B</td>
<td>$494.9B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Exports - Goods &amp; Services</td>
<td>0.9%</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
<td>13.4%</td>
<td>10.7%</td>
<td>13.4%</td>
<td>4.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Imports - Goods &amp; Services</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
<td>-2.7%</td>
<td>5.2%</td>
<td>13.0%</td>
<td>16.7%</td>
<td>8.3%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Mortgage Applications Surged 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom Moeller</a> January 10, 2007


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070110d.jpg" width="353">
The total number of mortgage applications surged 16.6% last week, the strongest weekly increase since June 2005 according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.
Purchase applications jumped 16.2% and raised the level of applications in early January 11.3% above the December average which rose 4.7% from November.
During the last ten years there has been a 58% correlation between the y/y change in purchase applications and the change in new plus existing single family home sales.
Applications to refinance also were strong and jumped 17.2%. Applications to refinance in early January were 1.2% above the December average which was unchanged from November.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070110c.jpg" width="353">
The effective interest rate on a conventional 30-year mortgage fell w/w to 6.32% but remained up slightly from the December average of 6.28%. The peak for 30 year financing was 7.08% late in June. Rates for 15-year financing also fell sharply to 6.10%. Interest rates on 15 and 30 year mortgages are closely correlated (&gt;90%) with the rate on 10 year Treasury securities.
During the last ten years there has been a (negative) 79% correlation between the level of applications for purchase and the effective interest rate on a 30-year mortgage.
The Mortgage Bankers Association surveys between 20 to 35 of the top lenders in the U.S. housing industry to derive its refinance, purchase and market indexes. The weekly survey covers roughly 50% of all U.S. residential mortgage applications processed each week by mortgage banks, commercial banks and thrifts. Visit the Mortgage Bankers Association site <a href="http://www.mbaa.org">here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/SURVEYW/@S5/@S5.HTM">MBA Mortgage Applications (3/16/90=100)</a></th>
<th scope="col">01/05/07</th>
<th scope="col">12/29/06</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Total Market Index</td>
<td>671.1</td>
<td>575.6</td>
<td>11.8%</td>
<td>584.2</td>
<td>708.6</td>
<td>735.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Purchase</td>
<td>472.8</td>
<td>406.9</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
<td>406.9</td>
<td>470.9</td>
<td>454.5</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Refinancing</td>
<td>1,923.8</td>
<td>1,640.4</td>
<td>28.5%</td>
<td>1,634.0</td>
<td>2,092.3</td>
<td>2,366.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Export Growth Spread Around the Country: Texas Leads but Other States Participate 
by <a href="/comment/Stone.html">Carol Stone</a> January 10, 2007


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070110e.jpg" width="353">
The US Census Bureau publishes a voluminous amount of foreign trade data. So along with the national summary reported on by Tom Moeller, we will highlight for you one specific set of associated data, exports by state.
These shipments are counted from their &quot;origin of movement&quot;, that is where the transportation begins, rather than where the merchandise leaves the country. Census publishes total figures monthly for each state, and it publishes quarterly information on product and destination country, an extraordinarily detail dataset. The total data are contained in Haver&#39;s REGIONAL database, a wide-ranging collection of various economic data for states. The breakdown of state export data by product is a set of databases each covering a Census division of states. In EXPRQ6, for example, you can find the shipping weight of non-electrical machinery sent by ship or air from Tennessee to Aruba.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070110f.jpg" width="353">
The state export totals appear in a supplemental table in the Census Bureau&#39;s main FT900 International Trade press release. In our table below, we show the US Total and a selection of states. We picked the three largest exporters, Texas, California and Washington, and also a few others from various regions: Missouri in the midwest, Georgia in the southeast and Massachusetts in New England. All these data are not seasonally adjusted and are reported in current dollars on the so-called &quot;Census&quot; basis.
Total US exports in November were up 15.7% from a year ago. A number of states are showing more rapid expansion than that, particularly Texas, which is the largest exporter in dollar terms. It shipped $13.35 billion of merchandise to customers abroad in November, 20.9% more than November 2005. We can also compare these exports for a full year to gross state product (Haver database GSP); in 2005 they made 13% of Texas state product. California runs second in dollar value of exports, with $10.8 billion in November shipments; this was up 5.5% from the year-ago period. California exports were 7.2% of its GSP in 2005. Interestingly, Washington State is third; we haven&#39;t looked, but we&#39;d guess that aircraft and computer software make a large portion of the goods, which amounted to $5.4 billion in November, up a whopping 47.6% from the year before; exports constitute 14.2% of Washington&#39;s gross product. [New York State&#39;s total exports are marginally larger, but include more reexports, so they would represent less value added.]<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070110g.jpg" width="353">
Among the other states shown here, Missouri is seeing notable expansion of its export business. While November&#39;s shipments look small at just $1.3 billion, they are up 51% from a year ago and were more than double the 2003 amount.
We&#39;d also surmise -- without much investigation, to be sure -- that sizable overall export growth is related to the recently weak dollar. It&#39;s also important to note that outsourcing and other aspects of globalization do not work only to the detriment of the US economy. One reason for the publication of these data is a desire by officials in various states to show how their state can be competitive in world markets and thereby create jobs.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">US Exports by State (NSA, Mil.$)</th>
<th scope="col">Nov 2006</th>
<th scope="col">Oct 2006</th>
<th scope="col">Sept 2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Total US</td>
<td>91240</td>
<td>92476</td>
<td>88428</td>
<td>75365</td>
<td>68046</td>
<td>60312</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Yr/Yr % Chg</td>
<td>15.7</td>
<td>16.3</td>
<td>19.0</td>
<td>10.8</td>
<td>12.8</td>
<td>4.4</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Texas</td>
<td>13350</td>
<td>13959</td>
<td>12576</td>
<td>10730</td>
<td>9762</td>
<td>8237</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Yr/Yr % Chg</td>
<td>20.9</td>
<td>24.8</td>
<td>21.7</td>
<td>9.9</td>
<td>18.5</td>
<td>3.6</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">California</td>
<td>10761</td>
<td>11216</td>
<td>10862</td>
<td>9735</td>
<td>9155</td>
<td>7833</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Yr/Yr % Chg</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>7.6</td>
<td>13.4</td>
<td>6.3</td>
<td>16.9</td>
<td>1.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Washington</td>
<td>5410</td>
<td>4651</td>
<td>4546</td>
<td>3162</td>
<td>2814</td>
<td>2848</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Yr/Yr % Chg</td>
<td>47.6</td>
<td>37.7</td>
<td>149.3</td>
<td>12.4</td>
<td>-1.2</td>
<td>-1.3</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Missouri</td>
<td>1303</td>
<td>1143</td>
<td>1135</td>
<td>872</td>
<td>748</td>
<td>603</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Yr/Yr % Chg</td>
<td>50.8</td>
<td>7.5</td>
<td>27.4</td>
<td>34.1</td>
<td>11.9</td>
<td>41.1</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Massachusetts</td>
<td>2034</td>
<td>2175</td>
<td>2042</td>
<td>1837</td>
<td>1818</td>
<td>1555</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Yr/Yr % Chg</td>
<td>7.9</td>
<td>15.3</td>
<td>7.3</td>
<td>1.1</td>
<td>16.9</td>
<td>11.7</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Georgia</td>
<td>1629</td>
<td>1801</td>
<td>1656</td>
<td>1715</td>
<td>1633</td>
<td>1357</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Yr/Yr % Chg</td>
<td>5.4</td>
<td>8.3</td>
<td>-3.2</td>
<td>5.0</td>
<td>20.3</td>
<td>13.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Louise Curley

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070109f.jpg" width="353">
Recent data from Germany are generally positive. Exports, while still strong, declined slightly in November from 80.9 billion euros in October to 80.5 billion euros--the result perhaps of the strong euro. However, imports declined by an even greater amount from 63.6 billion euros in October to 61.2 billion euros in November with the result that the trade balance increased to !9.3 billion euros from 17.3 billion euros in October. The first chart shows German exports and imports of goods.
Industrial production in November increased 1.8% from October and was 6.1% above November, 2005. Construction, which, earlier this year, appeared to have bottomed out, was particularly strong--up 6.2% in November and 13.4% above November, 2005--due in part to the unseasonally warm weather. Production in manufacturing, however, also increased 1.5% from October and 6.2$ from November, 2005. The second chart shows German industrial production in construction and manufacturing.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070109g.jpg" width="353">
In spite of the deceleration in exports in November, the value of foreign manufacturing new orders increased 2.1% in November and were 6.4% above November, 2005. Domestic new orders increased only 0.6% in November from October, but were 9.9% above November, 2005. In the third chart, showing domestic and foreign new manufacturing orders, it can be seen that domestic new orders began to strengthen back in mid 2005 and to accelerate in the second quarter of 2006.
Retail sales have been the soft spot in the German economy. In view of the increased employment, noted earlier by Carol Stone, and the increase in the Value Added Tax on January 1, 2007, expectations had been for strong retail sales in the final months of 2006. Retail sales excluding autos and related stores, however, declined 1.5% in September, 0.1% in October and 0.1% again in November. Sales including autos and related stores did not fare much better. They were, respectively, -0.8%, 0.0% and 0.7%. The fourth chart shows retail sales excluding and including autos and related stores. The widening gap between the two series in recent months suggests that the impending increase in the VAT may have had at least stimulated purchases of autos.(We have rebased the retail sales from 2003=100 to 2000=100 to facilitate comparisons with the Industrial Production and New Orders data.)<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070109h.jpg" width="353"><img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070109i.jpg" width="353">

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">GERMANY&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">Nov 06</th>
<th scope="col">Oct 06</th>
<th scope="col">Nov 05</th>
<th scope="col">M/M %</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y %</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Exports&nbsp; (Bil Euro)</td>
<td>80.46</td>
<td>80.87</td>
<td>67.33</td>
<td>-0.51</td>
<td>19.50</td>
<td>783.62</td>
<td>727.41</td>
<td>666.78</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Imports&nbsp; (Bil Euro)</td>
<td>61.17</td>
<td>63.58</td>
<td>52.82</td>
<td>-3.79</td>
<td>13.66</td>
<td>625.87</td>
<td>572.60</td>
<td>535.83</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Balance on Goods &nbsp;(Bil Euro)</td>
<td>19.29</td>
<td>17.29</td>
<td>13.51</td>
<td>2.00*</td>
<td>5.78*</td>
<td>157.75</td>
<td>154.81</td>
<td>130.95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol"> Industrial Production (2000=100) </td>
<td>112.0</td>
<td>110.0</td>
<td>105.6</td>
<td>1.82</td>
<td>6.06</td>
<td>103.7</td>
<td>100.8</td>
<td>98.4</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Manufacturing</td>
<td>115.4</td>
<td>113.7</td>
<td>108.7</td>
<td>1.50</td>
<td>6.16</td>
<td>106.4</td>
<td>102.7</td>
<td>99.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Construction</td>
<td>87.9</td>
<td>82.3</td>
<td>72.1</td>
<td>6.20</td>
<td>13.36</td>
<td>76.7</td>
<td>80.6</td>
<td>84.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol"> Mfg New Orders Value (2000=100)</td>
<td>128.0</td>
<td>126.3</td>
<td>118.3</td>
<td>1.35</td>
<td>8.20</td>
<td>111.7</td>
<td>105.0</td>
<td>99.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Domestic</td>
<td>115.0</td>
<td>114.3</td>
<td>104.6</td>
<td>0.61</td>
<td>9.94</td>
<td>101.4</td>
<td>98.3</td>
<td>94.6</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Foreign</td>
<td>144.2</td>
<td>141.3</td>
<td>135.5</td>
<td>2.05</td>
<td>6.42</td>
<td>124.6</td>
<td>113.5</td>
<td>104.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Retail Sales excl autos, etc (2000=100)</td>
<td>103.7</td>
<td>103.8</td>
<td>103.8</td>
<td>-0.10</td>
<td>-0.10</td>
<td>103.7</td>
<td>101.4</td>
<td>100.0</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Retail Sales incl autos, etc (2000=100)</td>
<td>107.2</td>
<td>106.5</td>
<td>105.3</td>
<td>0.66</td>
<td>1.80</td>
<td>104.4</td>
<td>101.9</td>
<td>100.2</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Recent data from Germany are generally positive. Exports, while still strong, declined slightly in November from 80.9 billion euros in October to 80.5 billion euros--the result perhaps of the strong euro. However, imports declined by [...]

Mostly Positive News from Germany

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>

 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070109c.jpg" width="353">
 Unleaded gasoline prices at the pump fell three cents last week to an average $2.31 per gallon after a penny decline during the prior week. Nevertheless, the average price for gasoline in January is up to $2.32 from the December average of $2.31 and the November average of $2.23 per gallon.
Further relief from higher retail gasoline prices may be signaled by declines in the spot market (NY harbor) price for a gallon of regular gasoline which have totaled twenty cents over the last two days.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070109d.jpg" width="353">
Warmer weather also has helped crude oil prices lower. Yesterday, the spot price for WTI crude settled at $57.83 (-8.9% y/y), down four dollars from the December average of $61.94.
Warm temperatures also have pushed natural gas prices lower to $5.53 per mmbtu but a recent forecast of colder temps raised futures to $8.57
The latest Short-Term Energy Outlook from the U.S. Energy Information Administration is available <a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/steo/pub/contents.html">here</a>.
Recycling Petrodollars from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York Can be found <a href="http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/current_issues/ci12-9.pdf"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/surveyw/@S2/@S2.HTM">Weekly Energy Prices</a></th>
<th scope="col">01/08/07</th>
<th scope="col">01/01/07</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">US Retail Gasoline Price, Regular</td>
<td>$2.31</td>
<td>$2.33</td>
<td>-0.9%</td>
<td>$2.57</td>
<td>$2.27</td>
<td>$1.85</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>


</html>

Unleaded gasoline prices at the pump fell three cents last week to an average $2.31 per gallon after a penny decline during the prior week. Nevertheless, the average price for gasoline in January is up to $2.32 from the December [...]

Gasoline Prices Down Again

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>

 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070109e.jpg" width="353">
According to the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC)-UBS, chain store sales last week began the new year with a 0.7% rise. The gain lifted the opening level for 2007 3.0% above the December average which rose just 0.1% from November.
During the last ten years there has been a 45% correlation between the y/y change in chain store sales and the change in nonauto retail sales less gasoline.
The ICSC-UBS retail chain-store sales index is constructed using the same-store sales (stores open for one year) reported by 78 stores of seven retailers: Dayton Hudson, Federated, Kmart, May, J.C. Penney, Sears and Wal-Mart.
Going the other way, the leading indicator of chain store sales from ICSC-UBS fell for the third straight week and posted a 0.4% decline.
Mortgage Innovation and Consumer Choice from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco is available <a href="http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2006/el2006-38.pdf"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/surveyw/@S2/@S2.HTM">ICSC-UBS (SA, 1977=100)</a></th>
<th scope="col">1/06/07</th>
<th scope="col">12/30/06</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Total Weekly Chain Store Sales</td>
<td>480.3</td>
<td>476.8</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>3.6%</td>
<td>4.7%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>


</html>

According to the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC)-UBS, chain store sales last week began the new year with a 0.7% rise. The gain lifted the opening level for 2007 3.0% above the December average which rose just 0.1% [...]

Weekly Chain Store Sales Opened The New Year With A Gain

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070109a.jpg" width="353">
Small business optimism fell for the second consecutive month in December. The 3.2% decline followed a 1.0% November slip and left optimism 10.4% below its peak in late 2004, according to the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB).
During the last ten years there has been a 70% correlation between the level of the NFIB index and the two quarter change in real GDP.
Respondents expecting the economy to improve dropped sharply while the percentage of firms with job openings and those expecting higher real sales in six months fell moderately.
During the last ten years there has been a 72% correlation between the NFIB percentage and the y/y change in nonfarm payrolls.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070109b.jpg" width="353">
The percent planning to raise capital expenditures also dropped sharply to a three year low.
The percentage of firms planning to raise average selling prices rose moderately but the percentage of firms actually raising prices fell to the lowest level since early 2004. During the last ten years there has been a 60% correlation between the change in the producer price index and the level of the NFIB price index.
About 24 million businesses exist in the United States. Small business creates 80% of all new jobs in America.
The Economic Outlook, yesterday&#39;s speech by Federal Reserve Board Vice Chairman Donald L. Kohn, can be found <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2007/20070108/default.htm"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/SURVEYS/@S7/@S7.HTM">Nat&#39;l Federation of Independent Business</a></th>
<th scope="col">December</th>
<th scope="col">November</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Small Business Optimism Index (1986=100)</td>
<td>96.5</td>
<td>99.7</td>
<td>-4.9%</td>
<td>98.9</td>
<td>101.6</td>
<td>104.6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Small business optimism fell for the second consecutive month in December. The 3.2% decline followed a 1.0% November slip and left optimism 10.4% below its peak in late 2004, according to the National Federation of Independent [...]

Small Business Optimism Fell Again

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>

 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070109a.jpg" width="353">
Small business optimism fell for the second consecutive month in December. The 3.2% decline followed a 1.0% November slip and left optimism 10.4% below its peak in late 2004, according to the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB).
During the last ten years there has been a 70% correlation between the level of the NFIB index and the two quarter change in real GDP.
Respondents expecting the economy to improve dropped sharply while the percentage of firms with job openings and those expecting higher real sales in six months fell moderately.
During the last ten years there has been a 72% correlation between the NFIB percentage and the y/y change in nonfarm payrolls.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070109b.jpg" width="353">
The percent planning to raise capital expenditures also dropped sharply to a three year low.
The percentage of firms planning to raise average selling prices rose moderately but the percentage of firms actually raising prices fell to the lowest level since early 2004. During the last ten years there has been a 60% correlation between the change in the producer price index and the level of the NFIB price index.
About 24 million businesses exist in the United States. Small business creates 80% of all new jobs in America.
The Economic Outlook, yesterday&#39;s speech by Federal Reserve Board Vice Chairman Donald L. Kohn, can be found <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2007/20070108/default.htm"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/SURVEYS/@S7/@S7.HTM">Nat&#39;l Federation of Independent Business</a></th>
<th scope="col">December</th>
<th scope="col">November</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Small Business Optimism Index (1986=100)</td>
<td>96.5</td>
<td>99.7</td>
<td>-4.9%</td>
<td>98.9</td>
<td>101.6</td>
<td>104.6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Weekly Chain Store Sales Opened The New Year With A Gain 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom Moeller</a> January 9, 2007


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070109e.jpg" width="353">
According to the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC)-UBS, chain store sales last week began the new year with a 0.7% rise. The gain lifted the opening level for 2007 3.0% above the December average which rose just 0.1% from November.
During the last ten years there has been a 45% correlation between the y/y change in chain store sales and the change in nonauto retail sales less gasoline.
The ICSC-UBS retail chain-store sales index is constructed using the same-store sales (stores open for one year) reported by 78 stores of seven retailers: Dayton Hudson, Federated, Kmart, May, J.C. Penney, Sears and Wal-Mart.
Going the other way, the leading indicator of chain store sales from ICSC-UBS fell for the third straight week and posted a 0.4% decline.
Mortgage Innovation and Consumer Choice from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco is available <a href="http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2006/el2006-38.pdf"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/surveyw/@S2/@S2.HTM">ICSC-UBS (SA, 1977=100)</a></th>
<th scope="col">1/06/07</th>
<th scope="col">12/30/06</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Total Weekly Chain Store Sales</td>
<td>480.3</td>
<td>476.8</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>3.6%</td>
<td>4.7%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Gasoline Prices Down Again 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom Moeller</a> January 9, 2007


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070109c.jpg" width="353">
 Unleaded gasoline prices at the pump fell three cents last week to an average $2.31 per gallon after a penny decline during the prior week. Nevertheless, the average price for gasoline in January is up to $2.32 from the December average of $2.31 and the November average of $2.23 per gallon.
Further relief from higher retail gasoline prices may be signaled by declines in the spot market (NY harbor) price for a gallon of regular gasoline which have totaled twenty cents over the last two days.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070109d.jpg" width="353">
Warmer weather also has helped crude oil prices lower. Yesterday, the spot price for WTI crude settled at $57.83 (-8.9% y/y), down four dollars from the December average of $61.94.
Warm temperatures also have pushed natural gas prices lower to $5.53 per mmbtu but a recent forecast of colder temps raised futures to $8.57
The latest Short-Term Energy Outlook from the U.S. Energy Information Administration is available <a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/steo/pub/contents.html">here</a>.
Recycling Petrodollars from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York Can be found <a href="http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/current_issues/ci12-9.pdf"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/surveyw/@S2/@S2.HTM">Weekly Energy Prices</a></th>
<th scope="col">01/08/07</th>
<th scope="col">01/01/07</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2006</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">US Retail Gasoline Price, Regular</td>
<td>$2.31</td>
<td>$2.33</td>
<td>-0.9%</td>
<td>$2.57</td>
<td>$2.27</td>
<td>$1.85</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Mostly Positive News from Germany 
by <a href="/comment/Curley.html">Louise Curley</a> January 9, 2007


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070109f.jpg" width="353">
Recent data from Germany are generally positive. Exports, while still strong, declined slightly in November from 80.9 billion euros in October to 80.5 billion euros--the result perhaps of the strong euro. However, imports declined by an even greater amount from 63.6 billion euros in October to 61.2 billion euros in November with the result that the trade balance increased to !9.3 billion euros from 17.3 billion euros in October. The first chart shows German exports and imports of goods.
Industrial production in November increased 1.8% from October and was 6.1% above November, 2005. Construction, which, earlier this year, appeared to have bottomed out, was particularly strong--up 6.2% in November and 13.4% above November, 2005--due in part to the unseasonally warm weather. Production in manufacturing, however, also increased 1.5% from October and 6.2$ from November, 2005. The second chart shows German industrial production in construction and manufacturing.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070109g.jpg" width="353">
In spite of the deceleration in exports in November, the value of foreign manufacturing new orders increased 2.1% in November and were 6.4% above November, 2005. Domestic new orders increased only 0.6% in November from October, but were 9.9% above November, 2005. In the third chart, showing domestic and foreign new manufacturing orders, it can be seen that domestic new orders began to strengthen back in mid 2005 and to accelerate in the second quarter of 2006.
Retail sales have been the soft spot in the German economy. In view of the increased employment, noted earlier by Carol Stone, and the increase in the Value Added Tax on January 1, 2007, expectations had been for strong retail sales in the final months of 2006. Retail sales excluding autos and related stores, however, declined 1.5% in September, 0.1% in October and 0.1% again in November. Sales including autos and related stores did not fare much better. They were, respectively, -0.8%, 0.0% and 0.7%. The fourth chart shows retail sales excluding and including autos and related stores. The widening gap between the two series in recent months suggests that the impending increase in the VAT may have had at least stimulated purchases of autos.(We have rebased the retail sales from 2003=100 to 2000=100 to facilitate comparisons with the Industrial Production and New Orders data.)<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070109h.jpg" width="353"><img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/070109i.jpg" width="353">

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">GERMANY&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">Nov 06</th>
<th scope="col">Oct 06</th>
<th scope="col">Nov 05</th>
<th scope="col">M/M %</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y %</th>
<th scope="col">2005</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Exports&nbsp; (Bil Euro)</td>
<td>80.46</td>
<td>80.87</td>
<td>67.33</td>
<td>-0.51</td>
<td>19.50</td>
<td>783.62</td>
<td>727.41</td>
<td>666.78</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Imports&nbsp; (Bil Euro)</td>
<td>61.17</td>
<td>63.58</td>
<td>52.82</td>
<td>-3.79</td>
<td>13.66</td>
<td>625.87</td>
<td>572.60</td>
<td>535.83</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Balance on Goods &nbsp;(Bil Euro)</td>
<td>19.29</td>
<td>17.29</td>
<td>13.51</td>
<td>2.00*</td>
<td>5.78*</td>
<td>157.75</td>
<td>154.81</td>
<td>130.95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol"> Industrial Production (2000=100) </td>
<td>112.0</td>
<td>110.0</td>
<td>105.6</td>
<td>1.82</td>
<td>6.06</td>
<td>103.7</td>
<td>100.8</td>
<td>98.4</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Manufacturing</td>
<td>115.4</td>
<td>113.7</td>
<td>108.7</td>
<td>1.50</td>
<td>6.16</td>
<td>106.4</td>
<td>102.7</td>
<td>99.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Construction</td>
<td>87.9</td>
<td>82.3</td>
<td>72.1</td>
<td>6.20</td>
<td>13.36</td>
<td>76.7</td>
<td>80.6</td>
<td>84.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol"> Mfg New Orders Value (2000=100)</td>
<td>128.0</td>
<td>126.3</td>
<td>118.3</td>
<td>1.35</td>
<td>8.20</td>
<td>111.7</td>
<td>105.0</td>
<td>99.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Domestic</td>
<td>115.0</td>
<td>114.3</td>
<td>104.6</td>
<td>0.61</td>
<td>9.94</td>
<td>101.4</td>
<td>98.3</td>
<td>94.6</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Foreign</td>
<td>144.2</td>
<td>141.3</td>
<td>135.5</td>
<td>2.05</td>
<td>6.42</td>
<td>124.6</td>
<td>113.5</td>
<td>104.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Retail Sales excl autos, etc (2000=100)</td>
<td>103.7</td>
<td>103.8</td>
<td>103.8</td>
<td>-0.10</td>
<td>-0.10</td>
<td>103.7</td>
<td>101.4</td>
<td>100.0</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Retail Sales incl autos, etc (2000=100)</td>
<td>107.2</td>
<td>106.5</td>
<td>105.3</td>
<td>0.66</td>
<td>1.80</td>
<td>104.4</td>
<td>101.9</td>
<td>100.2</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>


</html>

USD/EUR exchange rate uncoupling from interest rate differential

Widespread downgrading of 2025 GDP outlook

Trade and fiscal policy uncertainty has exploded with the new administration

Much lower US electricity costs gives it a competitive advantage

Wage growth slowing in the US and Euro area; elevated and sticky in the UK

Stagflation-lite: Blue Chip forecasts below-trend growth and elevated inflation

US policy gyrations boosting policy uncertainty worldwide

Expected tariff hikes have boosted inflation expectations

US and Japan ended 2024 on solid ground in contrast to Europe

US economy expected to outperform other major economies in 2025

Only modest evidence of AI-related surge in US productivity growth

Previous Trump tariffs fading. A boost from new tariffs ahead?

Heavy US manufacturing states underperforming while Sun Belt states outperforming

Rising long-term yields a global phenomenon

US financial market concerns shifting from growth to inflation

Economic activity is picking up in the US but remains lackluster abroad

Policy uncertainty has surged since the US national elections.

Recent turnaround in US economic surprises leading to increases in rate-cut expectations

The outlook has brightened in the US, while it has dimmed for other major economies

Headline US PCE inflation elevated by sticky services prices

US and global equity prices have recently diverged

US leading global upturn in economic surprises

Blue Chip forecasters look for further significant monetary easing apart from Japan

Recent rise in global supply chain pressures could augur a pickup in global inflation pressures

Underperforming German economy generating increased policy uncertainty relative to Europe and the US

Our global data offering is unparalleled in terms of coverage, quality, and organization. We offer 290+ databases from 2500 government and private sources, a wealth of key survey and forecast data covering the world’s economies, and a robust offering of archive databases that drive machine learning for big data applications.

Optimized for precision analytics, our data is seamlessly integrated with Microsoft Office and all leading statistical packages through our DLX® software and platform independent HaverView™ website. We further offer direct database feeds, client server or cloud-based delivery, and RESTful API.


Privacy Policy

Disclaimer

Contact us

A premier time series data platform for the global strategy, research, and quant communities. 

New York

London

Singapore

Tokyo

Economy in Brief

Viewpoints

Contact Us

Our Data

Our Products

What We Do

Our Authors

About Us

Data News

Resources

Release Calendars

Training Center

Webinars

Newsletters

Download Software

For Clients

Live Updates

250502A5.jpg

250502B5.jpg

Nonfarm payrolls increased 177,000 (1.2% y/y) during April after rising 185,000 in March, revised from 228,000, and 102,000 in February, revised from 117,000. Expectations had been for a 130,000 rise in the Action Economics Forecast Survey. The latest figure left the three-month average change at 155,000 in April, down from 232,000 in January.

Average hourly earnings rose 0.2% during April after unrevised increases of 0.3% in March and 0.2% in February. Earnings growth of 3.8% y/y was below the 5.9% high in March 2022.

The unemployment rate, measured in the household survey, held m/m at an expected 4.2% in April, and compared to 4.1% in February and 4.0% in January. It reached a low of 3.4% in April 2023. The unemployment rate, including employees working part-time for economic reasons plus all marginally-attached workers, eased to 7.8% in April from 7.9% in March.

In the **establishment survey**, private-sector employment rose 167,000 (1.2% y/y) after a 170,000 March increase. Factory sector jobs edged 1,000 lower (-0.7% y/y) following a 3,000 gain. Construction sector employment increased 11,000 (1.7% y/y), after rising 7,000 in March.

Private service-producing sector employment increased 156,000 (1.4% y/y) in April after improving 161,000 in March. Increases varied greatly amongst service sector categories. Private education & health sector employment rose 70,000 (3.4% y/y) last month following a 74,000 March increase. Leisure & hospitality employment rose 24,000 (1.3% y/y) after a 38,000 gain. Trade, transportation & utilities rose 32,000 (0.9% y/y) in April following a 25,000 March increase. Professional & business services employment rose 17,000 (-0.1% y/y) following a 3,000 rise while temporary help employment rose 3,600 (-3.9% y/y) following a 2,700 decline. Financial activities employment improved 14,000 (1.2% y/y) after a 6,000 gain. The number of information sector jobs held steady (-0.4% y/y) last month after falling 2,000 in March.

Government sector payrolls rose 10,000 (1.3% y/y) last month after increasing 15,000 in March. The number of local government jobs increased 13,000 (1.4% y/y) following a 17,000 gain. State government employment rose 6,000 (1.8% y/y) following a 2,000 March increase but federal government payrolls fell 9,000 (-0.3% y/y), the third consecutive monthly decline.

Private-sector average hourly earnings rose 0.2% (3.8% y/y) in April after increasing 0.3% in March. Earnings in the goods-producing sector eased 0.1% (+4.0% y/y) following a 0.6% gain. Earnings in construction rose 0.3% (3.6% y/y), after a 0.2% rise but factory sector earnings declined 0.3% (+4.3% y/y) after surging 0.8% in March. In the private services-sector, earnings rose 0.2% (3.7% y/y) in April for the third straight month. Information sector pay increased 1.0% (5.2% y/y) last month after easing 0.1%, and financial activities earnings rose 0.5% (4.3% y/y) for the second straight month. Trade, transportation & utilities sector pay increased 0.4% (3.4% y/y) after 0.6%. Professional & business sector earnings increased 0.1% (4.4% y/y) after 0.2% in March. Leisure & hospitality earnings held steady (+3.8% y/y) following a 0.6% March increase.

250502C5.jpg

250502D5.jpg

The length of the average workweek held steady at 34.3 hours in April. The workweek in the goods-producing sector eased to 39.8 hours from 40.0 hours. The construction sector average workweek eased to 39.0 hours from 39.3 hours while the factory sector workweek moved lower to 40.0 hours from 40.2. The average workweek in the private service sector held at 33.2 hours. Professional & business service hours fell to 36.3 hours from 36.4 while trade, transportation & utilities hours improved to 34.3 from 34.0 hours. Private education hours rose slightly to 32.8, but leisure & hospitality held steady at 25.5 hours.

In the **household survey**, the unemployment rate held at 4.2% in April as employment rose 436,000 and the size of the labor force increased 518,000. The labor force participation rate edged up to 62.6% last month from 62.5% in March. It remained below the high of 63.3% early in 2020. The rate for teenagers declined to 36.9%. For workers aged 20-24, the rate held steady at 72.1%, up from 71.8% six months earlier. For workers aged 25-54 the rate rose to 83.6%, a five-month high. For individuals 55 and over, the rate improved to 38.4% in April.

The employment/population ratio for all workers in April rose to 60.0%. It remained below the peak reading of 61.1% in February, 2020 just prior to the pandemic.

The employment and earnings data are collected from surveys taken each month during the week containing the 12th day of the month. The labor market data are contained in Haver's **USECON** database. Detailed figures are in the **EMPL** and **LABOR** databases. The expectations figures are in the **AS1REPNA** database.

250502X5.jpg

250502F5.jpg

- Job growth spreads across most sectors.
- Earnings growth trend decelerates.
- Jobless rate holds steady.

U.S. Job Growth Is Firm in April but March Gain Is Lessened

Winnie Tapasanun

250502F32.jpg

250502G32.jpg

Total factory orders rose a slightly less-than-expected 4.3% m/m in March after rises of 0.5% in February and 1.8% in January, data from the U.S. Census Bureau showed. A 4.5% m/m March increase had been expected in the Action Economics Forecast Survey. The March reading was the third successive monthly rise and the largest since July 2024. The year-on-year rate accelerated to 6.0% in March, the highest since November 2022, from 2.3% in February. Notably, orders for nondefense aircraft & parts soared 139.0% in March following a 7.4% drop in February and a 92.9% surge in January. Factory orders excluding defense rose 4.8% (5.9% y/y), the largest of three straight m/m/ rises, after a 0.4% February increase. Factory orders excluding the transportation sector fell 0.2% (+1.1% y/y), the first m/m fall since August, after rising 0.3% in February, January and December.

Durable goods orders jumped 9.2% (11.9% y/y) in March, the third consecutive m/m gain and the biggest since July 2024, on top of a 0.8% increase in February (matching +9.2% m/m in the advance report on April 24). The March jump reflected m/m orders increases of 27.1% (the largest m/m surge since July 2024; 31.2% y/y) in transportation equipment, 1.1% (4.9% y/y) in primary metals, 0.5% (-0.4% y/y) in furniture & related products, 0.1% (2.5% y/y) in fabricated metal products, and 0.1% (0.9% y/y) in machinery. To the downside, durable goods orders for computers & electronic products (-1.3%; +2.7% y/y) and electrical equipment, appliances & components (-1.0%; +4.2% y/y) declined m/m in March.

Nondurable goods orders, which equal nondurable goods shipments, fell 0.3% (+0.4% y/y) in March, the first m/m fall since September, after a 0.1% uptick in February. The March fall reflected m/m drops of 2.4% (-9.3% y/y) in petroleum & coal products and 0.9% (-1.2% y/y) in apparel. To the upside, the following nondurable goods shipments rose m/m in March: leather & allied products (1.5%; 8.6% y/y), beverage & tobacco products (0.7%; 5.8% y/y), paper products (0.6%; 2.3% y/y), printing (0.3%; 3.8% y/y), textile mills (0.3%; 0.8% y/y), chemical products (0.2%; 5.4% y/y), plastics & rubber products (0.2%; 0.4% y/y), food products (0.1%; 1.8% y/y), and textile products (0.1%; 2.1% y/y).

Total shipments slipped 0.1% (+2.0% y/y) in March, the first m/m easing since October, after a 0.7% increase in February. Excluding transportation, shipments were virtually unchanged m/m (+1.1% y/y) in March following six straight m/m gains. Shipments of durable goods industries inched up 0.1% (3.8% y/y) in March, the smallest of four consecutive m/m increases, after a 1.3% advance in February. This reflected m/m durable goods shipments rises of 1.2% (5.6% y/y) in primary metals, 0.9% (0.1% y/y) in furniture & related products, 0.8% (-0.2% y/y) in nonmetallic mineral products, 0.4% (0.0% y/y) in machinery, 0.3% (1.8% y/y) in fabricated metal products, 0.2% (4.5% y/y) in computers & electronic products, 0.2% (-2.1% y/y) in wood products, and 0.1% (3.0% y/y) in electrical equipment, appliances & components. In contrast, durable goods shipments for transportation equipment (-0.5%; +7.3% y/y) and miscellaneous durable goods (-0.1%; +2.9% y/y) fell m/m in March following three successive m/m increases.

Unfilled orders rose 2.0% (2.3% y/y) in March, up for the eighth month in nine, after a 0.1% uptick in February. Excluding transportation, unfilled orders dipped 0.1% (+0.7% y/y) in March, the first m/m easing since May 2024, after holding steady in February. Backlogs of durable goods rose 2.0% (2.3% y/y) in March, reflecting m/m rises of 3.1% (3.1% y/y) in transportation equipment and 0.2% (2.4% y/y) in electrical equipment, appliances & components.

Inventories edged up 0.1% (0.9% y/y) in March, the fifth straight m/m increase, after rising at the same pace in the prior two months. Excluding transportation, inventories were up 0.1% (0.5% y/y) in March, the fifth consecutive m/m rise. Durable goods inventories ticked up 0.1% (1.0% y/y) in March after holding steady in February and January; nondurable goods inventories edged up 0.1% (0.8% y/y), the fifth successive m/m increase.

The factory sector data are available in Haver’s **USECON** database. The Action Economics Forecast Survey is in the **AS1REPNA** database.

250502H32.jpg

250502I32.jpg

- March manufacturers’ new orders +4.3% m/m; +6.0% y/y, highest since Nov. ’22.
- Durable goods orders (+9.2%) jump m/m, while nondurable goods orders (-0.3%) and shipments (-0.1%) decline m/m.
- Transportation equipt. orders +27.1% m/m, w/ a 139.0% m/m surge in nondefense aircraft & parts orders.
- Unfilled orders +2.0%, the eighth m/m rise in nine months.
- Inventories +0.1%, the fifth consecutive m/m increase.

U.S. Factory Orders Increase for the Third Straight Month in March

Robert Brusca

250502E.jpg

The global manufacturing data showed broad weakening in April as conditions weakened across more than half of the contributing early reporters in the S&P survey of manufacturing. Of the 18 early reporting countries, more than half of them showed deceleration over six months and 12 months. Over three months, only 8 of 18 showed deterioration and that's about as good as it got in this report. In the current month, month-to-month changes showed more than half of the survey contributors showing weaker results than the month before. In the S&P framework, manufacturing improved month-to-month for the U.S.; however, looking at sequential averages for the U.S., U.K., European monetary union, Canada, and Japan, we see a steady weakening and results over 12 months, over six months versus 12 months, and for three months versus 6 months. The highly developed countries are not doing particularly well.

Asian economies are also showing slight deterioration but doing a little better than the developed countries in general.

Only five of the 18 reporting countries have queue percentile standings in their data back to January 2021 that are above their medians. Readings at or above the 50% mark are at or above the median standing. Canada is showing the weakest manufacturing result on record over this span, in terms of its queue percentile standing which is at 0 in the current month.

I showed the graphic for the Baltic dry goods index in this report rather than statistics on the manufacturing PMI data because the Baltic data, which reflect shipping volume for dry goods - that is excluding things like oil - is weak but it's only in the neighborhood where it's been for some time. There has been a great deal of talk about how tariffs may have impacted trade flows, expected trade flows, shipping, shipping rates, and the like. However, according to the Baltic dry goods index, there isn't much evidence that this is occurring right now and affecting the current data. That may still lie ahead but for now it's not baked in the cake.

250502.jpg

Globally Manufacturing Weakens

Andrew Cates

**China-US shipping activity** 
The economic fallout from escalating US-China trade tensions is becoming increasingly visible in the data. A clear example is the chart below, which highlights a sharp drop in vessel arrivals at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, along with a notable decline in ships waiting offshore. These trends point to a tangible weakening in bilateral trade flows, as the effects of tit-for-tat tariffs imposed by both countries begin to bite. Given the outsized role the US and China play in global commerce, this slowdown is likely to reverberate through global supply chains, weighing on trade volumes, dampening demand, and curbing economic growth worldwide.

250501Z1.jpg

**GDP growth in Q1**
Data this week showed that the US economy contracted, albeit modestly, in Q1 even as the euro area recorded a modest expansion—an unusual divergence. The contraction in US GDP can be largely attributed to a sharp increase in imports, as firms rushed to front-load purchases ahead of anticipated tariff hikes. In addition, domestic demand was subdued, with weaker contributions from both consumer spending and government consumption. This decoupling between the US and euro area economies is particularly striking given the current global focus on the US dollar. While the euro area has shown unexpected signs of resilience, the US downturn raises important questions about its underlying momentum, especially as trade dynamics and policy uncertainty continue to cloud the outlook.

250501Z2.jpg

**The US dollar versus yield differentials**
Chart 3 below illustrates a sharp breakdown in the correlation between the US-Germany 10-year yield differential and the EUR/USD exchange rate. Historically, the dollar has moved closely with interest rate spreads, as yield-seeking capital flowed into US assets. But since early 2025—and more acutely following the April tariff actions—the dollar has weakened markedly even as the yield spread has narrowed only modestly. This decoupling underscores a critical shift: capital markets are reacting not just to monetary policy, but to rising trade and geopolitical uncertainty. In other words, the exchange rate is now being driven as much by risk sentiment as by interest rate arbitrage.

250501Z3.jpg

**The US economy’s structural outperformance and the dollar**
A second dynamic, captured in the next chart, reveals a tight correlation between the US real effective exchange rate and the potential GDP growth differential between the US and euro area over the past 50-60 years. This raises the question: has dollar strength (until recently) merely been a reflection of US growth leadership—or are capital inflows themselves helping to sustain this growth outperformance? In effect, the tail may be wagging the dog. Global investors have long allocated capital to the US, attracted by its macroeconomic resilience, technological leadership, and deep, liquid financial markets. The danger now is that the US trade war may disrupt this equilibrium. A sharp or sustained reduction in capital inflows could undermine growth, weaken the dollar, and trigger broader financial instability. Moreover, reversing this dynamic is not straightforward—barring a credible structural resurgence in European (or Asian) growth, the global investment landscape remains tilted toward the US.

250501Z4.jpg

**US competitiveness versus Europe, China and Japan** 
The next chart below examines relative unit labour costs across major economies since 2011. The US and China have seen a broadly similar trajectory, with steady increases in relative cost structures, while the euro area has remained flat and Japan has seen dramatic improvement. This suggests that, from a cost competitiveness standpoint, the US is not uniquely disadvantaged vis-à-vis China. However, as we discuss further below, this parallel erosion of cost competitiveness is occurring at much higher nominal wage levels in the US, which blunts its ability to regain export share through tariff-related shifts alone. The trade war strategy—absent a corresponding improvement in productivity or structural reforms—risks imposing costs without delivering material competitiveness gains.

250501Z5.jpg

**Average wages in selected developed and developing economies**
This point is reinforced by the final chart, which shows estimates for average monthly wages across countries in 2024. US labour remains much more expensive than in peer or emerging economies. So even if China’s costs rise in tandem with the US, the global supply chain has ample alternatives. 'China plus one' strategies are accelerating, and the US remains structurally misaligned with low-cost production hubs. Tariffs aimed at reshoring supply chains are unlikely to deliver sustained gains unless accompanied by deep supply-side reforms, and risk further disincentivizing foreign direct investment if global firms perceive US trade policy as erratic or punitive.

250501Z6.jpg

Financial markets found a measure of calm this week, buoyed by some subtle shifts in tone from US policymakers. A softening in the administration’s rhetoric around trade tariffs coupled with a less confrontational stance toward Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, helped ease tensions that had roiled markets earlier in the month. Equities rebounded modestly, and volatility indicators edged lower, reflecting cautious optimism that the worst of the policy shocks may be behind us. But beneath the surface, significant downside risks persist. New shipping data point to a pronounced slowdown in US-China trade flows (chart 1), suggesting the damage from recent tariff escalations is already rippling through global supply chains. Meanwhile, incoming data for the US revealed an unexpected contraction in the economy in Q1 and further signs of weakness in the labour market (chart 2). The US dollar, in the meantime, while long supported by superior growth and yield differentials, has begun to decouple from traditional drivers (charts 3 and 4) suggesting growing pressure on capital flows. At the same time, structural imbalances are drawing renewed scrutiny: unit labour cost comparisons show the US steadily losing competitiveness (chart 5), while nominal wage disparities remain stark versus China and other Asian economies, further complicating any effort to restore trade balance without broader reforms (chart 6). In short, while markets may be drawing temporary comfort from a pause in tariff brinkmanship, the deeper economic and financial vulnerabilities exposed this month remain unresolved—and increasingly central to the global macro narrative.

<iframe style="border-radius:12px" src="https://open.spotify.com/embed/episode/3PzXXKrkHcwtOLipohEdnB?utm_source=generator" width="100%" height="152" frameBorder="0" allowfullscreen="" allow="autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; fullscreen; picture-in-picture" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Charts of the Week: Tariff Truce, Tenuous Trust

250501F20.jpg

250501G20.jpg

U.S. light vehicle sales dropped 2.9% (+6.5% y/y) to 17.31 million units (SAAR) in April after surging 10.8% to 17.82 million units in March. The retreat in April vehicle sales accompanied a 1.7% y/y rise in real disposable income through March, which compared to 2.0% growth last year.

Sales declines were broad-based last month. Light truck sales fell 1.3% (+9.9% y/y) during April to 14.34 million units (SAAR), after rising 12.4% in March. Purchases of domestically-made light trucks declined 1.2% (+11.9% y/y) to 11.02 million units, after jumping 12.5% in March. Sales of imported light trucks fell 1.8% (+4.4% y/y) to 3.32 million units, following an 11.6% March surge.

Trucks’ record 82.8% share of the light vehicle market last month compared to 81.5% in March and 80.3% in April of last year. The share averaged 80.3% during all of 2024 versus 53.3% ten years earlier.

Auto sales also declined last month, down 9.5% (-7.5%) to 2.97 million units (SAAR) following a 3.5% March rise. The decline reversed all of the increase over the prior two months. Purchases of domestically-produced cars fell 9.8% (-4.3% y/y) last month to 2.22 million units, after rising 3.8% in March. Sales of imported autos declined 9.6% (-15.7% y/y) to 0.75 million units, following a 2.5% March increase.

Imports' 23.5% share of the U.S. light vehicle market was little changed from 23.6% in March and compared to a May 2023 low of 22.9% and a high of 26.3% in November of 2023. Imports' share of the passenger car market held steady at 25.3% last month and compared to 27.7% in April of last year. It reached a high of 38.7% in September 2021. Imports' share of the light truck market eased to 23.2% last month after falling to 23.3% in March.

U.S. vehicle sales figures can be found in Haver's **USECON** database. Additional detail by manufacturer is in the I**NDUSTRY** database.

250501H20.jpg

250501I20.jpg

- Light truck sales pull back, while auto sales tumble.
- Both domestic and imported sales decline.
- Imports' market share slips further.

Economy in Brief: January 2007

Jump to:

Mortgage Applications Surged

U.S. Trade Deficit Narrowed Unexpectedly

U.S. Trade Deficit Narrowed Unexpectedly

Mostly Positive News from Germany

Gasoline Prices Down Again

Weekly Chain Store Sales Opened The New Year With A Gain

Small Business Optimism Fell Again

Small Business Optimism Fell Again