Tom Moeller

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/041111c.jpg" width="353">
New home price appreciation across the US varies widely; by what is measured and by region.
The average price of a new home rose 8.4% through 3Q, a slowdown from the peak rate of appreciation of 13.7%. Median prices through 3Q rose 9.7%, down from a 15.4% peak in 1Q04.
Adjusted for quality improvements, the Census Bureau estimates that new home prices rose a lesser 6.4% through 3Q.
Older existing single family home prices rose a median 7.7% y/y through 3Q. That, however, reflects a 10.6% rise through 1Q04 in improvements (+14.2%) and repairs (2.3%).
Location, Location, Location: Home price appreciation in the Western region of the US during 2003 was roughly triple that in the Midwest, a comparison driven at least in part by 0.8% growth in employment in the West (2.5% in &#39;04) versus 0.1% growth in the Midwest (0.9% in &#39;04).
Are Home Prices the Next &quot;Bubble&quot;? from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York can be found <a href="http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/epr/04v10n2/mccarthy/mccarthy.html">here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"> New Single Family Home Prices</th>
<th scope="col"> 1 Year Chg.</th>
<th scope="col"> 2 Year Chg. (AR)</th>
<th scope="col">5 Year Chg. (AR)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">US (Average)</td>
<td>8.4%</td>
<td>11.0%</td>
<td>6.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Quality Adjusted</td>
<td>6.4%</td>
<td>6.9%</td>
<td>5.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;By Region Thru 2003:</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; West</td>
<td>8.9%</td>
<td>7.9%</td>
<td>6.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Northeast</td>
<td>7.8%</td>
<td>5.9%</td>
<td>5.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; South</td>
<td>4.4%</td>
<td>3.6%</td>
<td>3.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Midwest</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>3.8%</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

New home price appreciation across the US varies widely; by what is measured and by region. The average price of a new home rose 8.4% through 3Q, a slowdown from the peak rate of appreciation of 13.7%. Median prices through 3Q rose [...]

Home Price Appreciation Varies

Carol Stone, CBE

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/041110e.jpg" width="353">
Last night was the 15th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. Yesterday&#39;s (November 9) Wall Street Journal included a major article arguing that the resulting reunification of Germany had not brought the anticipated surge of economic benefits to that nation, but that other Central and Eastern European countries had done better.
Some recent measures of economic activity tend to bear this out, although the evidence is not clear. Most simply, data histories are short for many of these nations, rendering exact comparisons virtually impossible. Tomorrow, November 11, Germany will report its 3rd quarter GDP and the &quot;newer&quot; nations will come some weeks from now. Through the second quarter, it was certainly the case that over recent years, these other countries -- the Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary, and so on -- have had faster growth rates than Germany; we can comment more tomorrow on this development.
Today, though, we have employment data through September for Slovakia, so we can make some limited comparisons about job growth. Data for &quot;industry&quot;, which includes manufacturing, mining and utilities, extend back to 2000. For some other categories of business, they begin in 2001. Over the last year, &quot;industry&quot; jobs have grown at about a 1-1/4% pace. Total &quot;registered employment&quot;, encompassing &quot;industry&quot; and private services, is expanding at about 1-1/2%. In Germany, jobs in the &quot;total economy&quot; are increasing, but only at about 0.2% in the second and third quarters over respective year-ago periods. Jobs in Germany&#39;s industrial sector, &quot;Industry excluding Construction&quot;, have been declining noticeably, through the 2nd quarter by 2.2% from a year ago.
These partial data indicate that Slovakia has a more vigorous economy at present than Germany. But this is not the whole story. As seen in the table below, there was a notable slump in total jobs in Slovakia during 2002 and 2003 which was more severe than in Germany. <img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/041110f.jpg" width="353"> A similar pattern is evident in neighboring Poland, a country held up in the Wall Street Journal as the more vigorous counter-example to Germany&#39;s unexpected post-Unification slowness. Through the second quarter, total employment in Poland is barely increasing from year-earlier levels; however, private sector jobs have been advancing at about a 2.5% pace. This is quite favorable, but it also follows a deep decline in the private sector during 2002 and most of 2003.
These jobs data suggest that economic progress in the recently freed Soviet bloc is occurring, but in fits and starts. Such swings are hardly surprising as those nations work to restructure their economic systems and their incentive structures. No one said this would be easy.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">Millions</th>
<th scope="col">Sept 2004</th>
<th scope="col">2nd Qtr 2004</th>
<th scope="col">Year/Year</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Slovakia: Total </td>
<td>1.248</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>1.5</td>
<td>-4.3</td>
<td>-1.3</td>
<td>NA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;&nbsp; &quot;Industry&quot; </td>
<td>0.571</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>1.1</td>
<td>0.5</td>
<td>0.2</td>
<td>1.0</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Poland: Total</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>13.682</td>
<td>0.2</td>
<td>-1.2</td>
<td>-3.0</td>
<td>-2.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;&nbsp; Private Sector</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>9.458</td>
<td>2.4</td>
<td>-0.8</td>
<td>-3.7</td>
<td>2.0</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Germany: Total</td>
<td>38.543*</td>
<td>38.338</td>
<td>0.3*</td>
<td>-1.0</td>
<td>-0.6</td>
<td>0.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;&nbsp; &quot;Industry ex Construction&quot;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>7.953</td>
<td>-2.2</td>
<td>-2.7</td>
<td>-2.2</td>
<td>0.1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Last night was the 15th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. Yesterday's (November 9) Wall Street Journal included a major article arguing that the resulting reunification of Germany had not brought the anticipated surge of [...]

Slovakia Employment Firms in September; Former Soviet-Bloc Nations Show Irregular Progress 15 Years Later

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/041110g.jpg" width="353">
The Federal Open Market Committee raised the target rate for federal funds by 25 basis points to 2.00%, as expected. The discount rate also was raised 25 basis points to 3.00%.
The decision was unanimous.
Today&#39;s press release from the Fed indicated &quot;The Committee believes that, even after this action, the stance of monetary policy remains accommodative and, coupled with robust underlying growth in productivity, is providing ongoing support to economic activity. Output appears to be growing at a moderate pace despite the rise in energy prices, and labor market conditions have improved. Inflation and longer-term inflation expectations remain well contained.
For the complete text of the Fed&#39;s latest press release please click <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/press/monetary/2004/20041110/default.htm">here</a>.
This <a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/net/20041101/cover.pdf">report</a> from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis addresses &quot;Gasoline Affordability.&quot;

</body>
</html>

The Federal Open Market Committee raised the target rate for federal funds by 25 basis points to 2.00%, as expected. The discount rate also was raised 25 basis points to 3.00%. The decision was unanimous. Today's press release from [...]

Federal Funds Rate Raised to 2.0%

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/041110a.jpg" width="353">
Mortgage applications fell 4.5% last week and reversed about half of the 8.2% gain the week earlier, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA).
Purchase applications fell 2.7% after the prior week&#39;s 12.6% surge. During the last ten years there has been a 60% correlation between the y/y change in purchase applications and the change in new plus existing home sales.
Applications to refinance fell 6.7% to the lowest level since early last month.
The effective interest rate on a conventional 30-year mortgage rose to 5.96% from 5.90% the prior week and from averaged 5.92% in October. The effective rate on a 15-year mortgage rose to 5.41%.
The Mortgage Bankers Association surveys between 20 to 35 of the top lenders in the U.S. housing industry to derive its refinance, purchase and market indexes. The weekly survey accounts for more than 40% of all applications processed each week by mortgage lenders. Visit the Mortgage Bankers Association site <a href="http://www.mbaa.org"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/SURVEYW/@S5/@S5.HTM"> MBA Mortgage Applications (3/16/90=100)</a></th>
<th scope="col">11/05/04</th>
<th scope="col">10/29/04</th>
<th scope="col"> Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col"> 2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Total Market Index</td>
<td>727.3</td>
<td>761.7</td>
<td>16.2%</td>
<td>1,067.9</td>
<td>799.7</td>
<td>625.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Purchase</td>
<td>483.0</td>
<td>496.5</td>
<td>28.7%</td>
<td>395.1</td>
<td>354.7</td>
<td>304.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Refinancing</td>
<td>2,148.7</td>
<td>2,303.9</td>
<td>3.1%</td>
<td>4,981.8</td>
<td>3,388.0</td>
<td>2,491.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Mortgage applications fell 4.5% last week and reversed about half of the 8.2% gain the week earlier, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA). Purchase applications fell 2.7% after the prior week's 12.6% surge. During the [...]

Mortgage Applications Falter

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/041110c.jpg" width="353">
Last week, initial claims for unemployment insurance ticked up 2,000 to 333,000 following the sharp 19,000 decline the prior week. The Consensus expectation had been for 337,000 claims.
The four week moving average of initial claims fell to 336,000 (-11.2% y/y), the lowest level in four years.
During the last ten years there has been a (negative) 73% correlation between the level of initial claims and the m/m change in payroll employment.
Continuing claims for unemployment insurance rose 19,000 following a deepened 26,000 decline the prior week.
The insured rate of unemployment remained at 2.2% for the fifth week.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"> <a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/WEEKLY/@W5/@W507/@W507.HTM"> Unemployment Insurance (000s)</a></th>
<th scope="col"> 11/06/04</th>
<th scope="col"> 10/30/04</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col"> 2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Initial Claims</td>
<td>333</td>
<td>331</td>
<td>-10.5%</td>
<td>402</td>
<td>404</td>
<td>406</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Continuing Claims</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>2,813</td>
<td>-18.8%</td>
<td>3,531</td>
<td>3,570</td>
<td>3,018</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Last week, initial claims for unemployment insurance ticked up 2,000 to 333,000 following the sharp 19,000 decline the prior week. The Consensus expectation had been for 337,000 claims. The four week moving average of initial claims [...]

Initial Claims for Unemployment Insurance Ticked Up

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img quot align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/041110d.jpg" width="353">
Import prices rose jumped 1.5% last month versus the Consensus expectation for a 1.0% gain. All of the increase reflected higher oil prices while non-petroleum prices fell.
Non-petroleum import prices fell in October the first down month in a year. Capital goods prices fell 0.2% (-1.3% y/y) due to a 0.6% decline in computer prices (-6.5% y/y). Capital goods prices excluding computers rose 0.1% (+1.5% y/y). Non-auto consumer goods prices were again unchanged (+0.5% y/y), flat or down in each month since January.
Petroleum prices rose sharply as crude oil prices surged. The price of Brent crude oil in November has retraced its prior month&#39;s strength.
During the last ten years there has been a (negative) 55% correlation between the level of the dollar and the y/y change in nonpetroleum import prices.
Export prices jumped 0.7% as nonagricultural prices surged 1.0% (5.2% y/y). Prices of industrial supplies and materials jumped 2.4% (15.3% y/y).

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"> <a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@E8/@E807/@E807.HTM"> Import/Export Prices (NSA)</a></th>
<th scope="col">Oct</th>
<th scope="col">Sept</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col"> 2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Import - All Commodities</td>
<td>1.5%</td>
<td>0.5%</td>
<td>9.7%</td>
<td>2.9%</td>
<td>-2.5%</td>
<td>-3.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Petroleum</td>
<td>11.7%</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
<td>67.6%</td>
<td>21.0%</td>
<td>3.0%</td>
<td>-17.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Non-petroleum</td>
<td>-0.2%</td>
<td>0.0%</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
<td>1.1%</td>
<td>-2.4%</td>
<td>-1.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Export - All Commodities</td>
<td>0.7%</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>4.5%</td>
<td>1.6%</td>
<td>-1.0%</td>
<td>-0.8%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Import prices rose jumped 1.5% last month versus the Consensus expectation for a 1.0% gain. All of the increase reflected higher oil prices while non-petroleum prices fell. Non-petroleum import prices fell in October the first down [...]

Import Price Gain All Oil

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/041110b.jpg" width="353">
The U.S. foreign trade deficit eased to $51.6B in September from the near record $53.5B in August which was revised shallower due to higher exports. Consensus expectations had been for a deficit of $54.0B.
Total exports grew 0.8% for the second month (+13.3% y/y). Goods exports jumped 1.4% (15.0% y/y) due to broad gains but higher exports of foods &amp; beverages stole the show with a 15.3% m/m gain (+4.0% y/y).
Non auto consumer goods exports also were strong for the second month with a 2.9% (+14.9% y/y) gain and capital goods export rose 1.0% (12.8% y/y).
Total imports fell for the second month in the last three, down 0.8% (17.1% y/y) as petroleum imports fell 4.3% (+42.8% y/y) despite a rise in crude oil prices to an average $37.62/bbl. Crude oil prices rose another $6.00/bbl in October but have since retraced all of that gain. The quantity of energy related petroleum products fell 9.7% in September -1.3% y/y).
Imports of non-petroleum goods rose 0.2% (15.3% y/y). In constant 2000$ nonpetroleum imports fell 0.1% (+15.5% y/y). Foods imports fell 2.6% (+3.7% y/y as did &quot;other&quot; imports by 5.9%. Capital goods imports rose 1.4% (17.6% y/y) but nonauto consumer goods imports fell 0.1% (+9.2% y/y, down for the fifth consecutive month.
The US trade deficit with China deepened to another record of $15.5.0B ($124.1B in 2003). Year over year, exports to China rose 36.6% and imports rose 24.6%. The US trade deficit with Japan eased to $6.1B ($66.0B in 2003) as did the deficit with the European Union which eased to $7.7B ($97.9B in 2003).
&quot;Reflections on China&#39;s Economy&quot; from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco is available <a href="http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2004/el2004-31.pdf"> here</a>.
&quot;Exchange Rate Movements and the U.S. International Balance Sheet&quot; from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco can be found <a href="http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2004/el2004-25.pdf"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@EE/@EE03/@EE03.HTM"> Foreign Trade</a></th>
<th scope="col">Sept</th>
<th scope="col">Aug</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col"> 2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Trade Deficit</td>
<td>$51.6B</td>
<td>$53.5B</td>
<td>$41.3B(9/03)</td>
<td>$496.5B</td>
<td>$421.7B</td>
<td>$362.7B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Exports - Goods &amp; Services</td>
<td>0.8%</td>
<td>0.8%</td>
<td>13.3%</td>
<td>4.6%</td>
<td>-3.1%</td>
<td>-6.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Imports - Goods &amp; Services</td>
<td>-0.8%</td>
<td>2.6%</td>
<td>17.1%</td>
<td>8.5%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
<td>-5.5%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

The U.S. foreign trade deficit eased to $51.6B in September from the near record $53.5B in August which was revised shallower due to higher exports. Consensus expectations had been for a deficit of $54.0B. Total exports grew 0.8% for [...]

A Shallower U.S. Trade Deficit in September

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/041110b.jpg" width="353">
The U.S. foreign trade deficit eased to $51.6B in September from the near record $53.5B in August which was revised shallower due to higher exports. Consensus expectations had been for a deficit of $54.0B.
Total exports grew 0.8% for the second month (+13.3% y/y). Goods exports jumped 1.4% (15.0% y/y) due to broad gains but higher exports of foods &amp; beverages stole the show with a 15.3% m/m gain (+4.0% y/y).
Non auto consumer goods exports also were strong for the second month with a 2.9% (+14.9% y/y) gain and capital goods export rose 1.0% (12.8% y/y).
Total imports fell for the second month in the last three, down 0.8% (17.1% y/y) as petroleum imports fell 4.3% (+42.8% y/y) despite a rise in crude oil prices to an average $37.62/bbl. Crude oil prices rose another $6.00/bbl in October but have since retraced all of that gain. The quantity of energy related petroleum products fell 9.7% in September -1.3% y/y).
Imports of non-petroleum goods rose 0.2% (15.3% y/y). In constant 2000$ nonpetroleum imports fell 0.1% (+15.5% y/y). Foods imports fell 2.6% (+3.7% y/y as did &quot;other&quot; imports by 5.9%. Capital goods imports rose 1.4% (17.6% y/y) but nonauto consumer goods imports fell 0.1% (+9.2% y/y, down for the fifth consecutive month.
The US trade deficit with China deepened to another record of $15.5.0B ($124.1B in 2003). Year over year, exports to China rose 36.6% and imports rose 24.6%. The US trade deficit with Japan eased to $6.1B ($66.0B in 2003) as did the deficit with the European Union which eased to $7.7B ($97.9B in 2003).
&quot;Reflections on China&#39;s Economy&quot; from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco is available <a href="http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2004/el2004-31.pdf"> here</a>.
&quot;Exchange Rate Movements and the U.S. International Balance Sheet&quot; from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco can be found <a href="http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2004/el2004-25.pdf"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@EE/@EE03/@EE03.HTM"> Foreign Trade</a></th>
<th scope="col">Sept</th>
<th scope="col">Aug</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col"> 2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Trade Deficit</td>
<td>$51.6B</td>
<td>$53.5B</td>
<td>$41.3B(9/03)</td>
<td>$496.5B</td>
<td>$421.7B</td>
<td>$362.7B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Exports - Goods &amp; Services</td>
<td>0.8%</td>
<td>0.8%</td>
<td>13.3%</td>
<td>4.6%</td>
<td>-3.1%</td>
<td>-6.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Imports - Goods &amp; Services</td>
<td>-0.8%</td>
<td>2.6%</td>
<td>17.1%</td>
<td>8.5%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
<td>-5.5%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Import Price Gain All Oil 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom Moeller</a> November 10, 2004


<img quot align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/041110d.jpg" width="353">
Import prices rose jumped 1.5% last month versus the Consensus expectation for a 1.0% gain. All of the increase reflected higher oil prices while non-petroleum prices fell.
Non-petroleum import prices fell in October the first down month in a year. Capital goods prices fell 0.2% (-1.3% y/y) due to a 0.6% decline in computer prices (-6.5% y/y). Capital goods prices excluding computers rose 0.1% (+1.5% y/y). Non-auto consumer goods prices were again unchanged (+0.5% y/y), flat or down in each month since January.
Petroleum prices rose sharply as crude oil prices surged. The price of Brent crude oil in November has retraced its prior month&#39;s strength.
During the last ten years there has been a (negative) 55% correlation between the level of the dollar and the y/y change in nonpetroleum import prices.
Export prices jumped 0.7% as nonagricultural prices surged 1.0% (5.2% y/y). Prices of industrial supplies and materials jumped 2.4% (15.3% y/y).

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"> <a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@E8/@E807/@E807.HTM"> Import/Export Prices (NSA)</a></th>
<th scope="col">Oct</th>
<th scope="col">Sept</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col"> 2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Import - All Commodities</td>
<td>1.5%</td>
<td>0.5%</td>
<td>9.7%</td>
<td>2.9%</td>
<td>-2.5%</td>
<td>-3.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Petroleum</td>
<td>11.7%</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
<td>67.6%</td>
<td>21.0%</td>
<td>3.0%</td>
<td>-17.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Non-petroleum</td>
<td>-0.2%</td>
<td>0.0%</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
<td>1.1%</td>
<td>-2.4%</td>
<td>-1.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Export - All Commodities</td>
<td>0.7%</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>4.5%</td>
<td>1.6%</td>
<td>-1.0%</td>
<td>-0.8%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Initial Claims for Unemployment Insurance Ticked Up 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom Moeller</a> November 10, 2004


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/041110c.jpg" width="353">
Last week, initial claims for unemployment insurance ticked up 2,000 to 333,000 following the sharp 19,000 decline the prior week. The Consensus expectation had been for 337,000 claims.
The four week moving average of initial claims fell to 336,000 (-11.2% y/y), the lowest level in four years.
During the last ten years there has been a (negative) 73% correlation between the level of initial claims and the m/m change in payroll employment.
Continuing claims for unemployment insurance rose 19,000 following a deepened 26,000 decline the prior week.
The insured rate of unemployment remained at 2.2% for the fifth week.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"> <a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/WEEKLY/@W5/@W507/@W507.HTM"> Unemployment Insurance (000s)</a></th>
<th scope="col"> 11/06/04</th>
<th scope="col"> 10/30/04</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col"> 2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Initial Claims</td>
<td>333</td>
<td>331</td>
<td>-10.5%</td>
<td>402</td>
<td>404</td>
<td>406</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Continuing Claims</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>2,813</td>
<td>-18.8%</td>
<td>3,531</td>
<td>3,570</td>
<td>3,018</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Mortgage Applications Falter 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom Moeller</a> November 10, 2004


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/041110a.jpg" width="353">
Mortgage applications fell 4.5% last week and reversed about half of the 8.2% gain the week earlier, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA).
Purchase applications fell 2.7% after the prior week&#39;s 12.6% surge. During the last ten years there has been a 60% correlation between the y/y change in purchase applications and the change in new plus existing home sales.
Applications to refinance fell 6.7% to the lowest level since early last month.
The effective interest rate on a conventional 30-year mortgage rose to 5.96% from 5.90% the prior week and from averaged 5.92% in October. The effective rate on a 15-year mortgage rose to 5.41%.
The Mortgage Bankers Association surveys between 20 to 35 of the top lenders in the U.S. housing industry to derive its refinance, purchase and market indexes. The weekly survey accounts for more than 40% of all applications processed each week by mortgage lenders. Visit the Mortgage Bankers Association site <a href="http://www.mbaa.org"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/SURVEYW/@S5/@S5.HTM"> MBA Mortgage Applications (3/16/90=100)</a></th>
<th scope="col">11/05/04</th>
<th scope="col">10/29/04</th>
<th scope="col"> Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col"> 2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Total Market Index</td>
<td>727.3</td>
<td>761.7</td>
<td>16.2%</td>
<td>1,067.9</td>
<td>799.7</td>
<td>625.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Purchase</td>
<td>483.0</td>
<td>496.5</td>
<td>28.7%</td>
<td>395.1</td>
<td>354.7</td>
<td>304.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Refinancing</td>
<td>2,148.7</td>
<td>2,303.9</td>
<td>3.1%</td>
<td>4,981.8</td>
<td>3,388.0</td>
<td>2,491.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

PMIs showing widespread revival of global economy

Crude oil price has returned to pre-conflict level but traffic through Hormuz still subpar

Surging orders for computers and electronics propelling durable goods orders

Next year's inflation forecasts are on the rise and above target

Disrupted global supply chains placing upward pressure on US goods prices

Construction of data centers has overtaken transportation construction in US

Elevated energy prices putting intense upward pressure on input prices around the globe

US is big leader in global surge in private AI investment

Larger-than-usual income tax refunds this year are supporting consumer spending

Sharply rising share of AI-related jobs

Inflationary impact of surge in oil prices larger in Europe than in the US

Futures market thinks the price of oil will recede significantly over the next six months

Recent pickup in US defense orders could help support overall growth ahead

Cost of transporting crude oil has soared to series high

Market-based inflation expectations have not yet reflected recent surge in oil prices

Global equity markets are fearing a major economic disruption from soaring oil prices

Is recent drop in sentiment signaling softer growth ahead?

With the Iran conflict, geopolitical risk has soared to alarming levels

Soaring AI-related investment in US underpinning strong contribution of business spending to overall growth

AI-related outperformance of IP in Advanced Asia ex Japan

Resilient US economy pushing up Blue Chip 2026 outlook

US and China big leaders in adoption of AI models

Robust US demand for advanced technology products

China's export growth rotating away from the US

More pronounced upward revisions in countries more exposed to AI investment

Our global data offering is unparalleled in terms of coverage, quality, and organization. We offer 290+ databases from 2500 government and private sources, a wealth of key survey and forecast data covering the world’s economies, and a robust offering of archive databases that drive machine learning for big data applications.

Optimized for precision analytics, our data is seamlessly integrated with Microsoft Office and all leading statistical packages through our DLX® software and platform independent HaverView™ website. We further offer direct database feeds, client server or cloud-based delivery, and RESTful API.


Privacy Policy

Disclaimer

Contact us

Service Health

A premier time series data platform for the global strategy, research, and quant communities. 

New York

London

Singapore

Tokyo

Economy in Brief

Viewpoints

Contact Us

Our Data

Our Products

What We Do

Our Authors

About Us

Data News

Featured Data Additions

Resources

Release Calendars

Training Center

Webinars

Newsletters

Download Software

For Clients

Live Updates

Andrew Cates

**Growth Surprises Continue to Underpin Equity Resilience**
Global equity markets have proved remarkably resilient in recent weeks, shrugging off intermittent bouts of geopolitical and policy uncertainty to grind higher. Chart 1 below helps explain why: it tracks the relationship between global growth-versus-inflation surprises and world equity markets, and on that measure the recent run of global growth data has continued to surprise on the upside relative to inflation outturns — a combination that has historically been supportive for risk assets. Whether that resilience persists will depend on whether the growth-surprise advantage evident in the chart below can be sustained in the face of the inflationary pressures explored below.

260709Z1.jpg

**PMIs Confirm a Broadly Solid Global Expansion**
This week's final composite PMI readings for June reinforced the broader impression of resilient global growth. As chart 2 below shows, most major economies posted readings comfortably in expansionary territory, with India continuing to lead the pack and the US not far behind. Even the laggards in the sample are hovering close to the expansion threshold rather than falling decisively below it, suggesting stabilisation rather than outright contraction (and with the UK a notable exception).

260709Z2.jpg

**Inflation Surprises Are Creeping Back, and Bond Yields Are Taking Notice**
The US growth picture painted by Haver's surprise indices broadly echoes the message from the global PMI data. Chart 3 below shows the combined growth-and-inflation surprise index drifting higher this week, and closer inspection suggests growth is doing most of that work, with activity data continuing to outperform expectations. That is, on the face of it, good news. But it has not stopped bond markets from taking notice: short-dated Treasury yields have remained elevated in recent weeks, as stronger growth keeps alive the possibility that the Federal Reserve holds rates higher for longer or even lifts them in coming weeks.

260709Z3.jpg

**Supply Chains Are Tightening** 
Latest data show that global supply chain pressures tightened by less in June than they had the month before, likely reflecting the easing of Middle East tensions through much of the period. Chart 4 below shows that pressures troughed in the middle of last year and have been building gradually since, though June's slower pace of tightening suggests that easing had started to feed through. Still, today's flare-up threatens to undo that improvement, particularly if it affects shipping routes or energy flows through the region once again.

260709Z4.jpg

**Extreme Weather: An Old Supply-Side Risk Returns**
Geopolitics is not the only source of supply-side risk currently in play. Large parts of Europe have been gripped this week by another intense and prolonged heatwave, with temperatures in several major cities running well above seasonal norms. Extreme heat of this kind carries real economic costs: it depresses labour productivity, particularly in outdoor and manufacturing-adjacent sectors, strains electricity grids as air-conditioning demand spikes, and can disrupt agricultural output and river-based transport when water levels fall. Episodes like this have become more frequent in recent years, and while any single heatwave rarely shifts the macro picture on its own, the cumulative effect of more frequent and more severe weather events could start showing up in productivity and inflation data across the advanced economies. It is a reminder that the supply side of the global economy faces structural as well as cyclical challenges, and that climate-related disruption deserves a permanent place alongside geopolitics and demographics in any assessment of medium-term inflation risk.

260709Z5.jpg

**AI Investment: The Other Side of the Supply Equation**
Set against these supply-side headwinds is a genuinely positive structural development: the extraordinary scale of private investment now flowing into artificial intelligence. Chart 6 below shows just how sharply that investment has grown in recent years, reaching a fresh high last year. If even a fraction of that investment translates into genuine productivity gains, it could provide a meaningful long-run offset to the energy, climate and geopolitical constraints highlighted elsewhere in this week's charts. The scale of the bet now being placed on AI is large enough that it is beginning to show up in aggregate investment and capital expenditure data across the advanced economies, and it is likely to remain one of the defining structural themes shaping the global growth outlook over the remainder of this decade.

260709Z6.jpg

Global markets head into this week’s closing stages digesting a mixed set of signals. Last week's US non-farm payrolls report undershot expectations, adding to questions about the durability of the US labour market even as broader activity data have continued to hold up well. Compounding that picture, news broke today of renewed instability in the Middle East, reintroducing a geopolitical risk premium into markets just as investors had begun to look past it. Global equity markets have nonetheless remained resilient, continuing to track the broadly encouraging tone of incoming activity data (chart 1). That resilience was reinforced by a solid set of global PMIs across most major economies over the past few days (chart 2). Haver's surprise indices tell a similar story of positive growth momentum in the US, but with an important caveat: incoming inflation data have also been surprising to the upside, driven largely by higher oil prices (chart 3). These inflation risks could persist moreover, as global supply chain pressures have picked up in recent months and today's flare-up in the Middle East threatens to add further strain (chart 4). The world economy remains vulnerable to other supply-side shocks too, such as the extreme heat gripping much of Europe this week (chart 5). Still, on the other side of the ledger the enormous scale of investment now flowing into artificial intelligence could be a genuine source of supply-side potential (chart 6).

<iframe data-testid="embed-iframe" style="border-radius:12px" src="https://open.spotify.com/embed/episode/0dl4LKZaL1oTC5UPIaqrA9?utm_source=generator&si=7aa69345dbfd4ac4" width="100%" height="152" frameBorder="0" allowfullscreen="" allow="autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; fullscreen; picture-in-picture" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Charts of the Week: Growth Holds Firm

Winnie Tapasanun

260709F57.jpg

260709G57.jpg

Existing home sales unexpectedly fell 2.4% m/m (+2.8% y/y) to 4.09 million units (SAAR) in June, the first monthly decline since March, following an upwardly revised 3.7% increase to 4.19 million in May (previously +3.2%; 4.17 mil.), according to the National Association of Realtors (NAR). The Action Economics Forecast Survey had expected June sales of 4.20 million units. Sales remained 36.4% below a high of 6.43 million in January 2022 and 38.0% below a peak of 6.60 million in January 2021. The June decline coincided with a rise in the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate to 6.49% in June, the highest since August 2025, after increasing to 6.44% in May, according to Freddie Mac. The sales figures are based on closings of sales contracts signed over the past couple of months.

Existing single-family home sales fell 2.4% (+3.3% y/y) to 3.73 million units in June, the first m/m fall in three months, following a 4.1% gain to 3.82 million in May, remaining 34.6% below a high of 5.70 million in January 2022. Sales of condos and co-ops decreased 2.7% (-2.7% y/y) to 360,000 in June, the lowest level since May 2025, after being unchanged m/m for the third successive month at 370,000, remaining 50.7% below a high of 730,000 in January 2022.

Regionally, June existing home sales declined m/m in all regions except the Northeast. Sales in the South dropped 3.6% (+3.8% y/y) to 1.89 million in June, a three-month low, after a 3.2% rise in May, and sales in the Midwest slid 3.0% (+2.1% y/y) to 980,000 following a 7.4% May advance; both posted the first m/m decrease in three months. Sales in the West fell 1.3% (+2.8% y/y) to 740,000, the lowest level since January, after being flat m/m at 750,000 in May. In contrast, sales in the Northeast increased 2.1% (0.0% y/y) to 480,000 after a 4.4% May gain. Notably, the South remained the dominant region, accounting for 46.2% of total U.S. existing home sales.

The median price of all existing homes (NSA) rose 2.2% (1.8% y/y) to $440,600 in June, the fifth consecutive m/m rise, on top of an upwardly revised 3.3% increase to $431,200 in May ($429,300 previously). Prices were 22.1% above a low of $360,800 in January 2023. The median price of an existing single-family home climbed 2.3% (1.8% y/y) to $446,400 in June, the fifth straight m/m increase, after a 3.4% advance to $436,400 in May. The median price of condos and co-ops, up for the sixth time in seven months, grew 0.6% (1.6% y/y) to $380,000 following a 1.0% May gain to $377,800. Regionally, overall prices rose m/m and y/y in June in the Northeast (+5.6%; +3.9% y/y), Midwest (+2.1%; +2.7% y/y), South (+1.0%; +0.9% y/y), and West (+0.8%; +0.9% y/y). All these price series were at their record highs.

Inventories of homes for sale fell m/m in June for the first time since December. The number of existing homes for sale (NSA) declined 0.6% (+1.3% y/y) to 1.56 million units following an upwardly revised 4.7% May rise to 1.57 million (the highest level since November 2019). The supply of homes on the market at the current selling rate (NSA) increased to 4.6 months in June from 4.5 months in May and April, matching the highest level since August 2025. A record low in supply of 1.6 months was in January 2022.

The data on existing home sales, prices and affordability are compiled by the National Association of Realtors. The data on single-family home sales extend back to February 1968. Total sales and price data and regional sales can be found in Haver's **USECON** database. Regional price and affordability data and national inventory data are available in the **REALTOR** database. Mortgage interest rates can be found in the **WEEKLY** database. The expectations figure is from the Action Economics Forecast Survey, reported in the **AS1REPNA** database.

260709H57.jpg

260709I57.jpg

- June sales -2.4% m/m to 4.09 mil., first drop in three mths.; +2.8% y/y, third straight y/y rise.
- Sales m/m down in the South (-3.6%), Midwest (-3.0%), and West (-1.3%); up in the Northeast (+2.1%).
- Sales y/y up in all regions except the Northeast w/ a flat reading.
- Median sales price +2.2% (+1.8% y/y) to $440,600, a record high.
- Unsold inventory -0.6% (+1.3% y/y) to 1.56 mil. units, first m/m decline since Dec.; 4.6 months' supply, highest since Aug. ’25.

U.S. Existing Home Sales Unexpectedly Fall in June from a Five-Month High

Kathleen Stephansen, CBE

260709A1.jpg

260709B1.jpg

Initial claims for unemployment insurance declined 2,000 to 215,000 in the week ending July 4, from 217,000 in the week ending June 27, revised from 215,000. The four-week average was 218,750 in the July 4 week, down from 222,500 in the week ending June 27. The Action Economics/Haver Analytics Survey looked for 218,000 claims to have been filed. 

The total number of unemployment insurance beneficiaries—also known as “continuing claims”—rose by 8,000 to 1.814 million in the week ending June 27, from 1.806 million in the week ending June 20, revised from 1.814 million. The four-week moving average rose to 1.808 million in the June 27 week from 1.801 million in the June 20 week. The insured unemployment rate was unchanged at 1.2% in the week of June 27. Except for a one-week dip to 1.1% in the week of April 25, the insured unemployment rate has been at 1.2% since the week of November 29, 2025.

The insured unemployment rate varied greatly across individual states and territories. In the week ending June 20, the highest unemployment rates were in Washington (2.03%), New Jersey (2.11%), Minnesota (2.15%), and Puerto Rico (2.45%). The lowest rates were in South Dakota (0.28%), Florida (0.35%), Alabama and North Carolina (both 0.41%), Louisiana (0.42%), and Arkansas (0.49%). Rates in other notable states include California (1.88%), Pennsylvania (1.63%), Illinois (1.58%), New York (1.52%), and Texas (1.12%). These state data are not seasonally adjusted.

Data on weekly unemployment claims are from the Department of Labor itself, not the Bureau of Labor Statistics. They begin in 1967 and are contained in Haver’s **WEEKLY** database and summarized monthly in **USECON**. Data for individual states are in **REGIONW** back to December 1986.

260709C1.jpg

260709D1.jpg

- New claims declined by 2,000 to 215,000 in the week ending July 4.
- Continuing claims rose by 8,000 to 1.814 million in the week ending June 27.
- The insured unemployment rate was unchanged at 1.2% in the week of June 27.

U.S. Initial Unemployment Claims Declined in the Week of July 4

Robert Brusca

260709E.jpg

The German trade surplus surged in May to €19.1 billion from €14.7 billion in April. Exports rose by 0.9% in May while imports fell by 2.5%, creating a jump in the surplus month-to-month. In April, exports increased by 0.8% while imports rose by 1.1%.

Details on exports and imports lag by one month. In April, exports for motor vehicles and consumer goods declined, while exports of capital goods and other exports rose. On the import side, there were increases in imports ranging from 2.8% to 4.3% month-to-month across capital goods, motor vehicles, and consumer goods, but for the catch-all category ‘other’ imports fell by 2.7% month-to-month.

Flows adjusted for inflation showed an increase in exports of 0.4% in May while real imports fell by 3.3%. In April, real exports were flat while real imports fell by 0.2%.

The sequential behavior of real exports and real imports show independent activity. Imports log a clear weakening, rising 0.1% over 12 months, falling at a 5% annual rate over six months, and then falling at a 10.3% annual rate over three months. On the export side, real exports rose by 2.6% over 12 months, accelerated to a 7.2% annual rate over six months, but over three months have pulled back and fallen at a 1.6% annual rate. However, export growth still exceeds import growth over each of these horizons: 12 months, six months, and three months.

Trade trends paint a darkening picture of the German economy, with imports weak in real terms and trending even weaker, while activity on the export side of the equation pops over 12 months and six months but takes a hit over three months.

260709.jpg

The situation in the Strait of Hormuz continues to muddy the waters for the future. Passage through the strait has been sharply stopped, stabilized, revived, and now is back to being destabilized. That makes the strait a major uncertainty zone; it's hard to tell how these effects are going to play out over the coming months for German trade results and everyone else's. The deterioration of conditions in the Strait of Hormuz is now unknowable because Iran has decided to start shooting at ships, further destabilizing the outlook.

Germany

German Trades Surplus Balloons

260708A2.jpg

260708B2.jpg

Mortgage applications dropped 2.2% w/w (-5.4% y/y) in the week ending July 3, following no change in the week ending June 26, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey. Applications for loans to purchase a house edged down 0.6% w/w (-6.3% y/y) in the latest week, after rising 0.5% w/w (3.2% y/y) in the June 26 week.  Applications for loan refinancing dropped 4.1% w/w (-4.2% y/y) in the week ending July 3, after declining 0.7% w/w (+9.1% y/y) in the June 26 week.

The effective interest rate on a 30-year fixed-rate loan rose 1bp to 6.77% in the week ending July 3 from 6.76% in the week ending June 26. The rate on 15-year fixed-rate mortgages edged down 2bps to 6.17% in the July 3 week from 6.19% in the June 26 week. The 30-year Jumbo rate edged down 1bp to 6.62% in the latest week from 6.63% in the June 26 week. The rate on a 5-year ARM rose 5bps to 6.19% in the July 3 week from 6.14% in the June 26 week.

The share of applications for refinancing an existing loan declined to 40.6% of total applications in the week of July 3 from 41.4% in the June 26 week. The adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) share of activity edged up to 7.8% in the July 3 week from 7.6% in the June 26 week.

The average size of a mortgage declined 0.4% w/w (+1.3% y/y) to $391,500 in the week ending July 3, after rising 1.1% w/w (0.4% y/y) to $393,200 in the week ending June 26. The average size of a purchase loan declined 1.0% w/w (+4.3% y/y) to $451,000 in the latest week, after rising 1.2% w/w (2.7% y/y) to $455,600 in the June 26 week. The average size of a loan to refinance a mortgage edged down 0.1% w/w (-3.9% y/y) to $304,600 in the week ending July 3, after rising 0.5% w/w (-2.8% y/y) to $304,900 in the June 26 week.

The Mortgage Bankers Association Survey covers 75% of all U.S. retail residential mortgage applications and has been conducted weekly since 1990. Respondents include mortgage bankers, commercial banks and thrifts. The base period and value for all indexes is March 16, 1990=100. The figures for weekly mortgage applications and interest rates are available in Haver’s **SURVEYS** database.

- Both applications for loans to purchase and applications for loan refinancing declined in the latest week.
- Interest rate on 30-year fixed-rate loans rose 1bp to 6.77%. 
- Average loan size edged down.

Economy in Brief

Jump to:

Home Price Appreciation Varies

Slovakia Employment Firms in September; Former Soviet-Bloc Nations Show Irregular Progress 15 Years Later

Federal Funds Rate Raised to 2.0%

Mortgage Applications Falter

Initial Claims for Unemployment Insurance Ticked Up

Import Price Gain All Oil

A Shallower U.S. Trade Deficit in September

A Shallower U.S. Trade Deficit in September