Economy in Brief: 2023

All of the countries in this table have inflation targets of some sort set up at the 2% mark. While inflation rates clearly have worked lower, this has only come after an extended period of inflation having overshot in each of these countries. However, central banks have generally raised interest rates quite a lot and concerns have been raised globally about the potential for recession- the Bank of Japan has been the exception to these circumstances, having expended effort trying to recover from deflation and avoid a low inflation trap.

Something in the water?- I don't know if there is something in the water- which I should note would imply the oceans- or more properly the global aquifers as well as the impact of global rainfall (climate change at work?). Something has caused central banks to change their tune as central bankers, in this cycle, have clearly acted differently than in the past and have not aggressively gone out to contain inflation overshooting. Instead, central banks have been slow to act and tolerant of inflation over their respective targets. I'm not aware of global monetary conference that established that this was now the correct way to approach inflation in the new millennium. However, this is the situation that has simply developed and seemingly developed in each country on its own.

Fed policy puts Europe’s central bankers on the spot- Key central banking decisions have been made over the last several days with the Federal Reserve opting to not change policy but to provide statements about its intent in the future as well as a procedure known as forward guidance that is encompassed in a collection of forecasts that the Fed makes public four times a year in a presentation known as the Summary of Economic Projections (SEPs) or sometimes somewhat more colloquially called ‘the dots.’ With its new guidance, the Federal Reserve put markets on notice for a likely easier policy in the period ahead and this caused expectations to ramp up for the policy meetings today at the Bank of England and the European Central Bank. However, neither of these banks took the bait that the Fed went for. The ECB went out of its way to say there was a large distance between raising rates and cutting rates and that rate reductions were not even discussed at this meeting.

Central bankers’ dilemma- Central banks are in this somewhat curious position where inflation has fallen sharply. Although I've only presented year-over-year, three-month, and six-month calculations for some of the more ‘popular’ inflation measures, there is also core inflation, which is inflation excluding food and energy, and there are inflation calculations that make other exclusions that can cause the short-term inflation rate to look much lower. This fact has raised pressure on central banks particularly on the Fed in the U.S. to begin to consider an easier policy. The Federal Reserve, of course, is in a different position than these other central banks because while the Fed has an inflation target, it also has a dual mandate. The ECB, for example, has no such dilemma. It only has an inflation mandate to keep inflation at 2%.

Saying you do not believe in gravity does not allow you to escape its pull- While the Fed in the U.S. always says it doesn't react to political pressure, the Fed has been under tremendous political pressure especially by progressive Democrats to do nothing to cause the unemployment rate to rise despite the height of inflation that U.S. economy has been laboring under. In addition, the U.S. faces presidential elections within the next year and that's been a burden that the Fed has had to deal with. And it simply isn't possible to have been involved in policy economics in the United States to not think this has been a factor regardless of what Jerome Powell or anybody at the Fed says about making policy.

An uncomfortable reality- The situation all the central banks find themselves in is that inflation has been too high for too long. Year-over-year inflation is still too high, but over shorter periods inflation is running at a much lower pace and coming closer to their desired targets. And, of course, politicians in all countries whether they're running for office this year or not, want to keep the unemployment rates low as do other policymakers- hey it’s everyone’s objective, but within reason and context. Unemployment rates globally remain low; the European Monetary Union is experiencing among the lowest unemployment rates it has seen in its life; the U.S. unemployment rate is not far from the lowest it has experienced in the last 50 years; U.K. unemployment is not so well positioned. It may seem somewhat curious that in the case of the U.S. central bank that has a dual mandate it is protecting an unemployment rate near a 50-year low and tolerating an inflation rate that has had horrific overshoot that has been above its target for 34 months in a row -and may remain out of range for another 24 months – if you miss it for five year in a row, is it still relevant as a target? Still, we're supposed to believe that this set of decisions has occurred without any reference to politics.

Japan’s unique state- The Bank of Japan now faces the most consistent persisting inflation among this group of countries; however, it's in a different circumstance because prior to the impact of COVID and the global recession that resulted, it was chronically undershooting its inflation target and worried about that. In Japan, the concerns are rather opposite to those in the European Monetary Union, the U.K., and the U.S., as in Japan policymakers wonder if the increase in inflation is going to be permanent or not. Japan is still relatively more worried about a possible return to low inflation or even deflationary circumstances - although you can't see any evidence of that in the data presented in the table.

Industrial production in the European Monetary Union fell by 0.7% for the headline series that excludes construction. Output on this gauge also fell by 1% in September. It is also the second month in a row of manufacturing output declining. Output trends for manufacturing, for manufacturing sectors and for 13 of the oldest members of the union show broad declines and ongoing declines in industrial production.

Manufacturing- The headline series shows a negative growth rate over 12 months, six months and three months; while the declines are of a slightly lesser magnitude over shorter durations, that trend shift is minor. For manufacturing, there is an IP decline of 6.1% over 12 months, a decline at a 7.4% annual rate over six months and then a slower decline at a 3.4% annual rate over three months.

Sector trends- Looking at sectors, consumer goods hint at a slowdown in the rate of contraction with a 7.6% decline in output over 12 months that's reduced to a 1.6% annual rate decline over six months and to a 2.5% annual rate decline over three months. Intermediate goods output shows a less optimistic trend, but not a clear changing trend with output falling 4.1% over 12 months; the decline scales back to an annual rate of -3.6% over six months and then the decline steps up to a 5.2% annual rate over three months. Capital goods output shows a decelerating pace amid an ongoing contraction of output, with output falling 7.4% over 12 months, backing down to a -6.3% annual rate over six months and reduced further to a 2.9% decline over three months.

Member country trends- Among the 13 monetary union reporters on the table, six of them show declines in output in October that's after ten reported declines in September, and six reported declines in August. Over three months seven of these members show output declines; over six months eight members show output declines; and over 12 months nine members experience output declines. The quarter-to-date calculations, one month into the fourth quarter, show six of these reporters with output declining early in the quarter.

Growth rate rankings- The far-right column in this table ranks growth rates by country and by overall manufacturing sector on data back to October 2006. On this basis, all the sectors report growth rates that rank at least in the bottom 20% of their respective historic queues on this timeline. Consumer goods output, and particularly consumer goods output for nondurables, is especially weak. Among the EMU member countries reporting in this table, Ireland alone reports the weakest growth in manufacturing IP it has had during this whole period. Greece, surprisingly, logs growth that's in the top 4% of all its historic growth rates on this timeline. Only four countries report growth rates above their 50th percentile rank, which means only four have growth rates that are above the median growth rate for this span. Growth rates rank extremely low with an average ranking of about 36% and the median ranking in the 30th percentile.