Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics

Economy in Brief

  • Month-to-month manufacturing PMI changes were mixed in April with increases in eight of 18 observations (two unchanged by assumption because of missing data). Except for the U.S., the largest economies generally worsened in the month (Euro Area, Germany, France, the U.K, and China).

    The progression to better (or less bad) conditions is clearer looking at three-month changes. The three-month averages of the manufacturing PMIs show weakening compared to 6-months in only 5 of 18 categories. Over six months things shift again, and PMIs are better in only 6 of 18 categories. Over 12 months, this trend continues as only 5 of 18 are better.

    These metrics underscore that the current progression to ‘better’ (...or not as bad) is relatively recent and that the concept of ‘better’ applies just to comparisons over very recent months since over 6 months and 12-month conditions broadly are worsening.

    That is hardly surprising… When we turn to engage with the column on rank or queue standings of the level of diffusion readings, weakness is the overpowering result. The median standing is a 24-percentile standing; that places the median for the group in the bottom 25 percentile of all observations since January 2019 – that is an extremely weak median.

    One version of this month’s data is that there is some sort of revival going on… another version is that… “Well, yes, things are better, but not by much.” I am much more in the second camp than in the first camp. Still, it is notable that central banks have been hiking rates and inflation remains far too strong in most countries/regions and yet there has been some improvement in economic activity. Even if it is a minor effect, it is contrary to expectations and for that reason still notable.

    The median manufacturing PMI value for each of the last three months as well as each of the three sequential periods referred to above, the PMI medians all are below 50 – indicating that contraction is most common.

    • Index recovers a bit after hitting three-year low.
    • Employment, new orders & production improve.
    • Pricing power hits nine-month high.
    • Residential building continues to decline.
    • Nonresidential building moves up for third straight month.
    • Public sector building growth slows.
  • Japan has in progress a sharp rise in confidence over recent months. The rise in confidence is particularly sharp since February of this year. Most components were last higher in February 2022, over a year ago. For employment, willingness to buy durable goods, and for ‘the value of assets’ the last stronger observation is slightly more distant.

    Despite a rise in confidence that is particularly notable over the past two months, there are still low standings for the level of confidence and for its components in April. The ‘all households’ confidence rank is in its 16.6 percentile; for two-person households, confidence is in its 19th percentile.

    No components of confidence stand above their respective medians on data back to 2002. The strongest category is employment, with a 46-percentile standing. The weakest is the 7.2 percentile standing for ‘willingness to buy durable goods.’

    As for momentum, the 3-month and 6-month changes in the headline as well as the component survey values are larger than the increase over 12 months for all categories except employment where the 12-month gain exceeds the gains over both 3-months and 6-months. That tells us that employment has been steadily improving while other components had seen most of their gains relatively recently. Apart from that, the 3-month change across components as well as for the headline, accounts for most of the gain in the various reading ranging from 81% to 94% of the six-month gain. In one case, for income growth, the three-month change is larger than the six-month change.

    • Index surges to eight-month high.
    • Employment, production & new orders lead improvement.
    • Prices paid index also increases moderately.
    • Spending on goods declines; services increase.
    • Real disposable income improves.
    • Core price inflation weakens further.
    • Steady increase in ECI since mid-2021.
    • Wages and benefits for all workers both advanced 1.2% in Q1.
    • Goods-producing industries slightly stronger than service-providers.
  • The European Monetary Union (EMU) dodged what could have been a trigger for the call of a “rule of thumb” recession in the Area when GDP failed to fall for the second quarter in a row. The flash estimate for GDP in the EMU in the first quarter of 2023 is +0.3% annualized; this compares to a -0.2% annualized in the fourth quarter of 2022. Call it whatever you will, it certainly is a flat spot in economic growth. Growing only 0.3% at an annual rate after falling by 0.2% does not give an economy much momentum. Clearly, this is a point of weak growth. While it may not go over the bar for the call of recession, conditions in the monetary union remain weak. Inflation remains high. The European Central Bank is still raising rates to fight inflation, and the war between Ukraine and Russia continues to boil over in Europe, casting a pall across prospects for growth and prosperity in the European Monetary Union itself.

    Early reporters stay out of ‘recession trap’ In these early returns, there were only six monetary union members out of 19 that report individual country GDP this early. Out of these six only two, Germany and Italy, log negative growth in the fourth quarter. German GDP fell by 2.1% while Italian GDP fell by 0.5% (both of those are expressed at annual rates of change). However, currently there are no countries that are reporting back-to-back declines in GDP either (but Germany DOES report a decline in GDP year-over-year). So, neither the monetary union nor any of its early reporting members have triggered the rule of thumb call on recession of two consecutive quarters of negative growth. At this point, Germany has the weakest statistics among this group with GDP having fallen 2.1% at an annual rate in the fourth quarter and grown by only 0.2% at an annual rate in the first quarter of 2023. German GDP is down on balance over the last two quarters as well as year-over-year.

    Year-on-year growth Year-over-year growth in the monetary union is at 1.3% in the first quarter, down from 1.8% in the fourth quarter which was down from 2.5% in the third quarter which was down from 4.4% in the second quarter of 2022. There has been a steady deceleration in growth in the monetary union; we see decelerations common for member countries as well. Belgium is showing deceleration, Germany is showing deceleration and Portugal is showing deceleration. The exceptions are France, Italy, and Spain. France shows a speed up in its year-over-year growth at 0.8% in the first quarter compared with 0.4% gain in the fourth quarter; but up to that point French GDP had been decelerating too. Similarly, Italian GDP had been decelerating until this first quarter result where GDP is now up by 1.8% year-over-year, stronger than the 1.4% gain in the fourth quarter of 2022. Spain has been more of a rogue with decelerations in two of the previous three quarters but now in the first quarter 2023, a clear acceleration in growth at an annual rate of 3.8%, up from 2.9% in the fourth quarter period. Spain not only bucks the trend for deceleration it actually posts quite a strong GDP growth rate year-over-year on top of its relatively solid 1.9% pace in the first quarter itself.

    Big vs. small country trends However, the consolidated data at the table bottom, grouped to look at the four largest economies versus the rest of the monetary union, show that the largest economies continue to decelerate although the deceleration of the first quarter is ‘technical’ since the one-digit growth rate is 1.1%, the same as in the fourth quarter of 2022. For the rest of the monetary union, deceleration remains in progress as the first quarter growth rate at a 2% pace compares to 3.8% at an annual rate in the fourth quarter of 2022. The two data series also point out that growth has been slower, at least for the past year, in the four largest countries compared to the smaller countries in the rest of the union.

    Comparison with the U.S. I include U.S. data in this table to compare the performance in the monetary union with the U.S. economy. The U.S. shows less of a tendency for deceleration in GDP since and the third quarter of 2022 U.S. GDP speeds up then it slows down in the fourth quarter and now it speeds up again in the first quarter 2023. So that's not much of a dependable pattern and it doesn't conform to the clear encroaching weakness that we see in the monetary union. The recent weakness in U.S. growth in the first quarter of 1.1% is more substantial than the 0.3% logged in the first quarter for the European Monetary Union and that's on top of the much stronger 2.6% pace logged in the fourth quarter of 2022 compared to a 0.2% decline for the monetary union and back to the third quarter as well when U.S. GDP grew at a 3.2% annual rate compared to a 1.5% annual rate gain for the monetary union. However, EMU year-over-year growth had previously surpassed the U.S. regularly, mostly because of the stronger growth in the smaller EMU economies.

    Slowing in progress There is some sense in which the U.S. and Europe are going their separate ways, but there's also a sense in which there has been some considerable slowing in both of those economies. The U.S. case seems to be a little bit more complicated whereas the European Monetary Union seems to be on a broader smoother glidepath to lower rates of growth. This is interesting from the standpoint that the U.S. has also been much more consistent and aggressive with its rate hiking while the European Central Bank has been slower with its rate hiking and still has its benchmark interest rates much farther below its rate of inflation than is the case for the United States (where the PCE headline has just fallen below the Fed Funds rate). Based on that, we might have expected U.S. monetary policy to have slowed the economy more than in Europe, but of course these things are complicated; it's also true that U.S. money supply growth had previously surged much more than money supply had surged in Europe. If we turn the discussion to one of leads and lags in monetary policy, it's very possible that what we're seeing in the United States is still the evidence of a lagging monetary policy where past stimulus is still pushing the economy ahead and where the more recent move to slow the economy has not yet taking its full bite out of U.S. economic growth. These concerns continue to linger in the background.

    Sizing up growth If we look at annual growth rates and array them on a queue standing from the late 1990s, we find three European economies that still have relatively solid year-over-year growth based on their own historic standards. Italy's growth rate at 1.8% has a 78-percentile standing, Spain’s growth rate of 3.8% has a 76-percentile standing, while Portugal's 2.5% year-over-year growth rate has a 68.5 percentile standing. All of those are well above their historic medians. The European Monetary Union itself has a growth rate of 1.3% that has only a 37-percentile standing. The percentile standings in the rest of the union for early-reporting countries are low: for Belgium there's a 32.6 percentile standing, for France a 28-percentile standing, and for Germany an anemic18.5 percentile standing. Germany has the only year-over-year negative growth rate in the Monetary Union in the first quarter. By comparison, the 1.1% U.S. growth rate has a 29.5 percentile standing. The U.S. year-on-year growth rate of 1.6% is higher than the growth rate for EMU, but when compared to the year-on-year growth rates over earlier quarters the U.S. has been relatively weaker than the performance in the monetary union.