Tom Moeller

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040929b.jpg" width="353">
US real GDP growth last quarter was revised up to 3.3% as the estimated drag from foreign trade deficit erosion was lessened. Consensus expectations had been for an upward revision to just 3.0%.
Corporate profit growth was revised up to 2.9% (AR, 19.0% y/y). The earlier reported boom US nonfinancial corporate sector profit growth was revised higher to 26.2% (AR, 27.9% y/y). The rise in profits per unit of output was raised to 4.7% q/q (20.7% y/y).
Import growth was lowered slightly to 12.6% (10.7% y/y) and export growth was revised up slightly to 7.3% (AR, 10.8% y/y).
Inventory investment also was revised up slightly.
Growth in domestic final demand was little revised at 3.5%.
Prices grew the same 3.2% as estimated earlier.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@E7/@E701/@E701.HTM"> Chained 2000$, % AR</a></th>
<th scope="col"> 2Q &#39;04 (Revised)</th>
<th scope="col"> 2Q &#39;04 (Prelim.)</th>
<th scope="col"> 1Q &#39;04 (Final)</th>
<th scope="col"> Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">GDP</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
<td>4.5%</td>
<td>4.8%</td>
<td>3.0%</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
<td>0.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Inventory Effect</td>
<td>0.8%</td>
<td>0.7%</td>
<td>1.2%</td>
<td>0.7%</td>
<td>-0.1%</td>
<td>0.5%</td>
<td>-0.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Final Sales</td>
<td>2.5%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>4.1%</td>
<td>3.1%</td>
<td>1.4%</td>
<td>1.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Trade Effect</td>
<td>-1.1%</td>
<td>-1.4%</td>
<td>-0.8%</td>
<td>-0.3%</td>
<td>-0.3%</td>
<td>-0.7%</td>
<td>-0.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Domestic Final Demand</td>
<td>3.5%</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
<td>4.4%</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
<td>1.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Chained GDP Price Index</td>
<td>3.2%</td>
<td>3.2%</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>1.8%</td>
<td>1.7%</td>
<td>2.4%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

US real GDP growth last quarter was revised up to 3.3% as the estimated drag from foreign trade deficit erosion was lessened. Consensus expectations had been for an upward revision to just 3.0%. Corporate profit growth was revised up [...]

2Q US GDP Growth Revised Higher

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040929b.jpg" width="353">
US real GDP growth last quarter was revised up to 3.3% as the estimated drag from foreign trade deficit erosion was lessened. Consensus expectations had been for an upward revision to just 3.0%.
Corporate profit growth was revised up to 2.9% (AR, 19.0% y/y). The earlier reported boom US nonfinancial corporate sector profit growth was revised higher to 26.2% (AR, 27.9% y/y). The rise in profits per unit of output was raised to 4.7% q/q (20.7% y/y).
Import growth was lowered slightly to 12.6% (10.7% y/y) and export growth was revised up slightly to 7.3% (AR, 10.8% y/y).
Inventory investment also was revised up slightly.
Growth in domestic final demand was little revised at 3.5%.
Prices grew the same 3.2% as estimated earlier.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@E7/@E701/@E701.HTM"> Chained 2000$, % AR</a></th>
<th scope="col"> 2Q &#39;04 (Revised)</th>
<th scope="col"> 2Q &#39;04 (Prelim.)</th>
<th scope="col"> 1Q &#39;04 (Final)</th>
<th scope="col"> Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">GDP</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
<td>4.5%</td>
<td>4.8%</td>
<td>3.0%</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
<td>0.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Inventory Effect</td>
<td>0.8%</td>
<td>0.7%</td>
<td>1.2%</td>
<td>0.7%</td>
<td>-0.1%</td>
<td>0.5%</td>
<td>-0.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Final Sales</td>
<td>2.5%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>4.1%</td>
<td>3.1%</td>
<td>1.4%</td>
<td>1.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Trade Effect</td>
<td>-1.1%</td>
<td>-1.4%</td>
<td>-0.8%</td>
<td>-0.3%</td>
<td>-0.3%</td>
<td>-0.7%</td>
<td>-0.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Domestic Final Demand</td>
<td>3.5%</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
<td>4.4%</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
<td>1.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Chained GDP Price Index</td>
<td>3.2%</td>
<td>3.2%</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>1.8%</td>
<td>1.7%</td>
<td>2.4%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Again, Lower Rates Raised Mortgage Refinancing 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom Moeller</a> September 29, 2004


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040929a.jpg" width="353">
The index of mortgage applications compiled by the Mortgage Bankers Association jumped 4.9% last week. The average for mortgage applications in September is 7.4% ahead of August.
The effective interest rate on a conventional 30-year mortgage ticked lower to 5.91% versus 6.04% averaged in August. In May, 30-year financing averaged 6.53%. The effective rate on a 15-year mortgage fell to 5.33%, down from 5.97% averaged in May.
Applications to refinance added 7.7% to the prior week&#39;s 4.1% gain and for September are 12.9% ahead of August. Purchase applications rose 2.7% and for September are 3.5% higher than in August.
During the last ten years there has been a 60% correlation between the y/y change in purchase applications and the change in new plus existing home sales.
&quot;Federal Government Debt and Interest Rates&quot; from the American Enterprise Institute can be found <a href="http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.20885/pub_detail.asp"> here</a>.
The Mortgage Bankers Association surveys between 20 to 35 of the top lenders in the U.S. housing industry to derive its refinance, purchase and market indexes. The weekly survey accounts for more than 40% of all applications processed each week by mortgage lenders. Visit the Mortgage Bankers Association site <a href="http://www.mbaa.org"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">

</table>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/SURVEYW/@S5/@S5.HTM"> MBA Mortgage Applications (3/16/90=100)</a></th>
<th scope="col">09/24/04</th>
<th scope="col">09/17/04</th>
<th scope="col"> Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col"> 2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Total Market Index</td>
<td>724.7</td>
<td>690.7</td>
<td>2.5%</td>
<td>1,067.9</td>
<td>799.7</td>
<td>625.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Purchase</td>
<td>469.1</td>
<td>456.6</td>
<td>17.9%</td>
<td>395.1</td>
<td>354.7</td>
<td>304.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Refinancing</td>
<td>2,211</td>
<td>2,052.5</td>
<td>-11.8%</td>
<td>4,981.8</td>
<td>3,388.0</td>
<td>2,491.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Louise Curley

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040928e.jpg" width="353">
Consumer confidence among Dutch consumers fell to -22 in September from -19 in August. Consumers became less willing to purchase goods as the balance of those willing to purchase goods went to -20 from -17 in August. At the same time, consumers viewed the current climate somewhat less favorably with the balance dropping from -22 in August to -24 in September. In spite of these declines, the general trend of consumer confidence has been upward since March of 2003 and the three indicators of confidence are all well above year ago levels.
Confidence among producers in the Netherlands increased from 0.5 in August to 0.7 in September. Expectations of improved production trends outweighed appraisals of the current production and new order trends.
As shown in the attached chart, producer confidence has been in positive territory since May of this year--the first time this has occurred since March of 2001 except of a brief spike in September, 2002. Thus, the optimists among producers are beginning to outweigh the pessimists. In the case of consumers, however, the pessimist still outweigh the optimists by a wide margin.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Per Cent Balance</th>
<th scope="col">Sep 04</th>
<th scope="col">Aug&nbsp; 04</th>
<th scope="col">Sep&nbsp; 03</th>
<th scope="col">M/M pts</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y pts</th>
<th scope="col">2003 %</th>
<th scope="col">&nbsp;2002&nbsp;%</th>
<th scope="col">&nbsp; 2001&nbsp;%</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Consumer confidence</td>
<td>-22</td>
<td>-19</td>
<td>-34</td>
<td>-3</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>-25</td>
<td>-20</td>
<td>-1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Economic climate</td>
<td>-24</td>
<td>-22</td>
<td>-51</td>
<td>-2</td>
<td>26</td>
<td>-56</td>
<td>-39</td>
<td>-25</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Willingness to buy</td>
<td>-20</td>
<td>-17</td>
<td>-24</td>
<td>-3</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>-22</td>
<td>-8</td>
<td>15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td></td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Producer confidence</td>
<td>&nbsp;0.7</td>
<td>0.5</td>
<td>-4.9</td>
<td>0.2</td>
<td>5.6</td>
<td>-5.6</td>
<td>-1.6</td>
<td>-1.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;Production trend</td>
<td>-9</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>-9</td>
<td>-11</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>-1</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;Expected production trend</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>-1</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;New order trend</td>
<td>-4</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>-7</td>
<td>-4</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>-2</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>-3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Consumer confidence among Dutch consumers fell to -22 in September from -19 in August. Consumers became less willing to purchase goods as the balance of those willing to purchase goods went to -20 from -17 in August. At the same time, [...]

Dutch Consumer Confidence Falls Slightly While Producer Confidence Rises Slightly: Both Are Well Above the Lows of 2003

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040928a.jpg" width="353">
The average price for unleaded regular gasoline rose for the second consecutive week to $1.92 per gallon, up 2.7% from the prior week and up from $1.88 averaged in August.
The inflation adjusted &quot;real&quot; price of gasoline remained below well below the early 1981 peak, but the roughly 50% increase during the last two years rivals the gain leading to the prior peak.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040928b.jpg" width="353">
The rise accompanied a jump in crude oil prices. The price of West Texas Intermediate crude surged yesterday to $49.65 per barrel versus roughly $43.00/bbl. early in the month. In August WTI crude averaged $44.94/bbl.
Wholesale natural gas prices last week were $5.45/mmbtu (+21.4% y/y) versus the May high of $6.54.
For the latest Short Term Energy Outlook from the US Department of Energy click <a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/steo/pub/contents.html">here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/daily/@D3/@D306/@D306.HTM">Energy Prices</a></th>
<th scope="col">09/27/04</th>
<th scope="col">12/31/03</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col"> 2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">US Retail Gasoline, Regular ($/Gal.)</td>
<td>$1.92</td>
<td>$1.48</td>
<td>20.5%</td>
<td>$1.56</td>
<td>$1.35</td>
<td>$1.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Domestic Spot Market Price: West Texas Intermediate ($/Barrel)</td>
<td>$49.65</td>
<td>$32.55</td>
<td>74.6%</td>
<td>$32.78</td>
<td>$31.23</td>
<td>$19.38</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

The average price for unleaded regular gasoline rose for the second consecutive week to $1.92 per gallon, up 2.7% from the prior week and up from $1.88 averaged in August. The inflation adjusted "real" price of gasoline remained below [...]

Gasoline Prices Up as Crude Oil Nears $50 per Barrel

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040928d.jpg" width="353">
Chain store sales fell another 0.3% last week as Hurricane Jeanne hit Florida&#39;s east coast on Friday, according to the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC)-UBS. The decline followed a 1.1% drop the prior week prompted by Hurricane Ivan.
The decline lowered September sales so far 0.7% below the August average which was unchanged from July.
During the last ten years there has been a 60% correlation between y/y change in chain store sales and the change in non-auto retail sales less gasoline.
The ICSC-UBS retail chain-store sales index is constructed using the same-store sales reported by 78 stores of seven retailers: Dayton Hudson, Federated, Kmart, May, J.C. Penney, Sears and Wal-Mart. 

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"> <a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/surveyw/@S2/@S2.HTM"> ICSC-UBS (SA, 1977=100)</a></th>
<th scope="col">09/25/04</th>
<th scope="col">09/18/04</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col"> 2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Total Weekly Retail Chain Store Sales</td>
<td>433.5</td>
<td>434.7</td>
<td>3.5%</td>
<td>2.9%</td>
<td>3.6%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Chain store sales fell another 0.3% last week as Hurricane Jeanne hit Florida's east coast on Friday, according to the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC)-UBS. The decline followed a 1.1% drop the prior week prompted by [...]

U.S. Chain Store Sales Again Battered By A Hurricane

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040928c.jpg" width="353">
The Conference Board&#146;s September Index of Consumer Confidence slipped another 1.9% to 96.8 following a 6.6% decline in August that was revised slightly shallower versus the initial report. Consensus expectations had been for a reading of 99.5.
During the last twenty years there has been a 50% correlation between consumer confidence and the y/y change in real consumer spending.
The present situation index fell sharply for the second month, by 5.2% (+60.0% y/y). The index of consumer expectations actually rose slightly m/m (+10.3% y/y).
Jobs were viewed as hard to get by 28.3% of respondents versus 26.0% in August and the low of 25.7% in July. The percentage of respondents expecting more jobs in six months improved modestly m/m.
The Conference Board&#146;s survey isconducted by a mailed questionnaire to 5,000 households and about 3,500 typically respond.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@EF/@EF14/@EF1401/@EF1401.HTM"> Conference Board</a></th>
<th scope="col">Sept</th>
<th scope="col">Aug</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col"> 2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Consumer Confidence</td>
<td>96.8</td>
<td>98.7</td>
<td>25.7%</td>
<td>79.8</td>
<td>96.6</td>
<td>106.6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

The Conference Boards September Index of Consumer Confidence slipped another 1.9% to 96.8 following a 6.6% decline in August that was revised slightly shallower versus the initial report. Consensus expectations had been for a reading [...]

Consumer Confidence Down

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040928c.jpg" width="353">
The Conference Board&#146;s September Index of Consumer Confidence slipped another 1.9% to 96.8 following a 6.6% decline in August that was revised slightly shallower versus the initial report. Consensus expectations had been for a reading of 99.5.
During the last twenty years there has been a 50% correlation between consumer confidence and the y/y change in real consumer spending.
The present situation index fell sharply for the second month, by 5.2% (+60.0% y/y). The index of consumer expectations actually rose slightly m/m (+10.3% y/y).
Jobs were viewed as hard to get by 28.3% of respondents versus 26.0% in August and the low of 25.7% in July. The percentage of respondents expecting more jobs in six months improved modestly m/m.
The Conference Board&#146;s survey isconducted by a mailed questionnaire to 5,000 households and about 3,500 typically respond.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@EF/@EF14/@EF1401/@EF1401.HTM"> Conference Board</a></th>
<th scope="col">Sept</th>
<th scope="col">Aug</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col"> 2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Consumer Confidence</td>
<td>96.8</td>
<td>98.7</td>
<td>25.7%</td>
<td>79.8</td>
<td>96.6</td>
<td>106.6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
U.S. Chain Store Sales Again Battered By A Hurricane 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom Moeller</a> September 28, 2004


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040928d.jpg" width="353">
Chain store sales fell another 0.3% last week as Hurricane Jeanne hit Florida&#39;s east coast on Friday, according to the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC)-UBS. The decline followed a 1.1% drop the prior week prompted by Hurricane Ivan.
The decline lowered September sales so far 0.7% below the August average which was unchanged from July.
During the last ten years there has been a 60% correlation between y/y change in chain store sales and the change in non-auto retail sales less gasoline.
The ICSC-UBS retail chain-store sales index is constructed using the same-store sales reported by 78 stores of seven retailers: Dayton Hudson, Federated, Kmart, May, J.C. Penney, Sears and Wal-Mart. 

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"> <a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/surveyw/@S2/@S2.HTM"> ICSC-UBS (SA, 1977=100)</a></th>
<th scope="col">09/25/04</th>
<th scope="col">09/18/04</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col"> 2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Total Weekly Retail Chain Store Sales</td>
<td>433.5</td>
<td>434.7</td>
<td>3.5%</td>
<td>2.9%</td>
<td>3.6%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Gasoline Prices Up as Crude Oil Nears $50 per Barrel 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom Moeller</a> September 28, 2004


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040928a.jpg" width="353">
The average price for unleaded regular gasoline rose for the second consecutive week to $1.92 per gallon, up 2.7% from the prior week and up from $1.88 averaged in August.
The inflation adjusted &quot;real&quot; price of gasoline remained below well below the early 1981 peak, but the roughly 50% increase during the last two years rivals the gain leading to the prior peak.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040928b.jpg" width="353">
The rise accompanied a jump in crude oil prices. The price of West Texas Intermediate crude surged yesterday to $49.65 per barrel versus roughly $43.00/bbl. early in the month. In August WTI crude averaged $44.94/bbl.
Wholesale natural gas prices last week were $5.45/mmbtu (+21.4% y/y) versus the May high of $6.54.
For the latest Short Term Energy Outlook from the US Department of Energy click <a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/steo/pub/contents.html">here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/daily/@D3/@D306/@D306.HTM">Energy Prices</a></th>
<th scope="col">09/27/04</th>
<th scope="col">12/31/03</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col"> 2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
<th scope="col">2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">US Retail Gasoline, Regular ($/Gal.)</td>
<td>$1.92</td>
<td>$1.48</td>
<td>20.5%</td>
<td>$1.56</td>
<td>$1.35</td>
<td>$1.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Domestic Spot Market Price: West Texas Intermediate ($/Barrel)</td>
<td>$49.65</td>
<td>$32.55</td>
<td>74.6%</td>
<td>$32.78</td>
<td>$31.23</td>
<td>$19.38</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/040927b.jpg" width="353">
German business confidence declined slightly in September. The Munich based IFO institute&#39;s confidence index (2000=100) fell to 95.3 in August to 95.2 in September, but was 2.37% above September, 2003. There was a slight improvement in business&#39;s appraisal of current conditions, from 94.7 to 94.8, but a decline in expectations for the next six month from 95.9 to 95.7.
In addition to the index, the institute also publishes diffusion indexes based on the balance between respondents who expect conditions to improve or remain the same and those who expect conditions to worsen. The diffusion indexes, are available for broad industry sectors, as well as for the total.
Business as a whole remains pessimistic. The balance for all business worsened from -10.3 to -10.4. Businessmen in manufacturing, the one sector where there is a balance of optimists over pessimists, became somewhat less optimistic as the positive balance declined in September from 4.4. to 4.1, but it was 9.1 points above the negative balance of 5.4 in September 2003. The balance of pessimists over optimists in the wholesale sector declined by 1.7 points in September and was 5.1 points below the figure for a year ago. The balance of pessimists rose in both the construction and retail sectors, but while the balance in construction was only nominally below the year ago figure, that of the retail sector was 12.5 points lower.
The attached chart showing the balances for the important retail and manufacturing sectors suggests little, if any, signs that the German economy and, particularly, consumer spending are about to accelerate soon.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">IFO Indexes&nbsp; and % Balance of Optimists over Pessimists</th>
<th scope="col">Sep 04</th>
<th scope="col">Aug 04</th>
<th scope="col">Sep 03</th>
<th scope="col">M/M %</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y %</th>
<th scope="col">2003 %</th>
<th scope="col">&nbsp;2002&nbsp;%</th>
<th scope="col">&nbsp; 2001&nbsp;%</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Index (2000=100)</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td></td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Business Climate</td>
<td>95.2</td>
<td>95.3</td>
<td>93.0</td>
<td>-0.1</td>
<td>2.37</td>
<td>91.7</td>
<td>89.4</td>
<td>92.1</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Current Conditions</td>
<td>94.8</td>
<td>94.7</td>
<td>88.3</td>
<td>0.11</td>
<td>7.36</td>
<td>88.4</td>
<td>85.2</td>
<td>93.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Expectations (Next 6 months)</td>
<td>95.7</td>
<td>95.9</td>
<td>98.0</td>
<td>-0.21</td>
<td>-2.35</td>
<td>95.1</td>
<td>93.9</td>
<td>91.0</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">% Balance</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>pts</td>
<td>pts</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Total</td>
<td>-10.4</td>
<td>-10.3</td>
<td>-14.8</td>
<td>-0.1</td>
<td>4.4</td>
<td>-17.5</td>
<td>-22.0</td>
<td>-16.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Manufacturing</td>
<td>4.1</td>
<td>4.4</td>
<td>-5.4</td>
<td>-0.3</td>
<td>9.1</td>
<td>-7.9</td>
<td>-10.3</td>
<td>-10.2</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Construction</td>
<td>-45.6</td>
<td>-45.0</td>
<td>-45.3</td>
<td>-0.6</td>
<td>-0.3</td>
<td>-42.8</td>
<td>-44.4</td>
<td>-38.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Wholesale trade</td>
<td>-15.2</td>
<td>-16.9</td>
<td>-20.4</td>
<td>1.7</td>
<td>5.2</td>
<td>-24.9</td>
<td>-29.8</td>
<td>-20.8</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Retail trade</td>
<td>-31.1</td>
<td>-30.2</td>
<td>-18.8</td>
<td>-1.1</td>
<td>-12.5</td>
<td>-25.4</td>
<td>-40.1</td>
<td>-20.5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

German business confidence declined slightly in September. The Munich based IFO institute's confidence index (2000=100) fell to 95.3 in August to 95.2 in September, but was 2.37% above September, 2003. There was a slight improvement [...]

Germany Business Confidence Falls Slightly in September: Retailers Particularly Pessimistic

USD/EUR exchange rate uncoupling from interest rate differential

Widespread downgrading of 2025 GDP outlook

Trade and fiscal policy uncertainty has exploded with the new administration

Much lower US electricity costs gives it a competitive advantage

Wage growth slowing in the US and Euro area; elevated and sticky in the UK

Stagflation-lite: Blue Chip forecasts below-trend growth and elevated inflation

US policy gyrations boosting policy uncertainty worldwide

Expected tariff hikes have boosted inflation expectations

US and Japan ended 2024 on solid ground in contrast to Europe

US economy expected to outperform other major economies in 2025

Only modest evidence of AI-related surge in US productivity growth

Previous Trump tariffs fading. A boost from new tariffs ahead?

Heavy US manufacturing states underperforming while Sun Belt states outperforming

Rising long-term yields a global phenomenon

US financial market concerns shifting from growth to inflation

Economic activity is picking up in the US but remains lackluster abroad

Policy uncertainty has surged since the US national elections.

Recent turnaround in US economic surprises leading to increases in rate-cut expectations

The outlook has brightened in the US, while it has dimmed for other major economies

Headline US PCE inflation elevated by sticky services prices

US and global equity prices have recently diverged

US leading global upturn in economic surprises

Blue Chip forecasters look for further significant monetary easing apart from Japan

Recent rise in global supply chain pressures could augur a pickup in global inflation pressures

Underperforming German economy generating increased policy uncertainty relative to Europe and the US

Our global data offering is unparalleled in terms of coverage, quality, and organization. We offer 290+ databases from 2500 government and private sources, a wealth of key survey and forecast data covering the world’s economies, and a robust offering of archive databases that drive machine learning for big data applications.

Optimized for precision analytics, our data is seamlessly integrated with Microsoft Office and all leading statistical packages through our DLX® software and platform independent HaverView™ website. We further offer direct database feeds, client server or cloud-based delivery, and RESTful API.


Privacy Policy

Disclaimer

Contact us

A premier time series data platform for the global strategy, research, and quant communities. 

New York

London

Singapore

Tokyo

Economy in Brief

Viewpoints

Contact Us

Our Data

Our Products

What We Do

Our Authors

About Us

Data News

Resources

Release Calendars

Training Center

Webinars

Newsletters

Download Software

For Clients

Live Updates

250430N1.jpg

250430O1.jpg

Real GDP eased 0.3% SAAR (+2.1% y/y) during the first quarter of 2025 after increasing 2.4% in Q4’24 and 3.1% in Q3’24. A 0.4% increase had been expected in the Action Economics Forecast Survey. It was the first decline since Q1 2022.

Foreign trade subtracted 4.83 percentage points from growth last quarter as imports surged 41.3% (13.4% y/y) ahead of tariffs, which began to come into effect in the first quarter. The rise followed a 1.9% decline in Q4’24. Exports rose 1.8% (3.0% y/y) after easing 0.2% in Q4. Inventories added 2.25 percentage points to growth after subtracting 0.84 percentage point from Q4 growth.

Real final sales to domestic purchasers grew 2.3% (2.9% y/y) in Q1 after rising 3.0% in Q4. Personal consumption expenditures rose 1.8% (3.1% y/y) following a 4.0% gain. Durable goods spending fell 3.4% (+5.3% y/y) after surging 12.4% in Q4. Motor vehicle purchases declined 11.1% (+5.5% y/y) after strengthening 19.7% in Q4. Spending on home furnishings & appliances gained 1.5% (6.1% y/y) following a 5.4% rise. Recreational goods & vehicle outlays rose 2.5% (7.0% y/y) last quarter after a 13.9% Q4 increase.

Nondurable goods outlays rose 2.7% (3.0% y/y) following 3.1% growth in Q4. Apparel spending increased 6.7% (2.5% y/y) following a 5.0% rise. Food & beverage buying gained 2.5% (2.3% y/y) after a 1.8% increase. Gasoline & fuel oil purchases increased 4.6% (3.4% y/y) after falling 2.0% in Q4.

Spending on services increased 2.4% last quarter (2.7% y/y) after a 3.0% gain. Outlays on housing & utilities increased 3.4% (1.8% y/y) after rising 1.1% in Q4. Health care expenditures rose 4.0% (4.8% y/y) following a 4.7% strengthening. Transportation outlays increased 5.3% (4.6% y/y) after a 3.7% rise while recreation spending rose 4.7% (2.8% y/y) following a 4.5% rise. Restaurant & hotel expenditures declined 2.1% (+0.5% y/y) following a 2.8% rise. Financial services expenditures rose 1.9% (2.0% y/y) after a 3.1% Q4 increase.

Business fixed investment increased 9.8% (3.6% y/y) following a 3.0% decline in Q4. Expenditures on structures rose 0.4% (-0.4% y/y) after a 2.9% increase. Expenditures on producers’ durable equipment jumped 22.5% (8.0% y/y) after falling 8.7%.  Outlays on information processing equipment soared 69.3% (18.9% y/y) following a 7.3% decline. Industrial equipment investment fell 1.4% (-0.3% y/y) after easing 0.9%. Intellectual property product spending rose 4.1% (1.8% y/y) following a 0.5% decline. 

Residential structures investment increased 1.3% (-0.1% y/y) in Q1 after a 5.5% Q4 rise.

250430P1.jpg

250430Q1.jpg

Government spending fell 1.5% (+2.4% y/y) after a 3.1% Q4 rise. Federal government expenditures declined 5.1% (+2.9% y/y) after rising 4.0% in Q4. National defense expenditures declined 8.0% (+4.0% y/y) after increasing 4.8% in Q4. State & local government spending rose 0.8% (2.1% y/y) following a 2.5% rise.

The GDP price index rose 3.7% (2.6% y/y) after increasing 2.3% in Q4. It was the largest increase since Q4’22. A 2.4% increase had been expected. The PCE chain price index increased 3.6% (2.5% y/y) following a 2.4% rise. The PCE price index excluding food and energy rose 3.5% (2.8% y/y) after increasing 2.6% in Q4. The business fixed investment price index rose 0.4% (1.8% y/y) after 1.5% rise. The residential price index strengthened 3.9% (3.2% y/y) after a 1.9% rise while the government price index increased 4.7% (2.8% y/y) following a 2.1% rise.

The GDP data can be found in Haver’s **USECON** and **USNA** databases. **USNA** contains virtually all of the Bureau of Economic Analysis detail in the national accounts. The Action Economics consensus estimates can be found in **AS1REPNA**.

250430R1.jpg

250430S1.jpg

- Decline in GDP is first in three years.
- Foreign trade subtracts substantially ahead of tariffs.
- Domestic final demand growth weakens.
- Price index strengthens with higher core PCE prices.

U.S. GDP Unexpectedly Declines in Q1’25; Prices Strengthen

Michael J. Moran

250430A.jpg

250430B.jpg

High-side readings on the price indexes for personal consumption expenditures in January and February caused some concern about emerging price pressure, especially with some policies of the Trump administration possibly adding to the upward force. However, March brought notable relief, with the headline price index falling slightly (-0.04%). A marked decline in energy prices was helpful (-2.7%), but core prices also were subdued, increasing less than 0.1%.  Year-over-year changes were still above the Fed’s target of 2%, but only barely so for the headline measure (2.3%). The core index backed away from the reading of 3.0% in February, but the latest reading of 2.7% was in line with observations in the past year, and still uncomfortably above target.

Consumers roused from a winter slumber in March, with nominal outlays increasing 0.7%. With inflation restrained, real outlays also posted a gain of 0.7%. Spending on durable gods stood out, with real outlays advancing 3.2%. Real outlays for both nondurable goods and services rose 0.4%, a solid pace. Signs of life were certainly welcome after an average decline of 0.1% in January and February. The March rebound left growth of 1.8% (annual rate) in the first quarter.

The brisk increase in spending in March was supported by a solid gain in personal income (0.5% in both nominal and real terms). Growth in wage income was firm at 0.5%, while proprietors’ income was robust with a gain of 1.8% (not annualized!). The farm sector led the advance in proprietors’ income, but the nonfarm sector also was strong (0.6%).

The personal income and consumption figures are available in Haver’s **USECON** database with detail in the **USNA** database. The Action Economics forecasts are in **AS1REPNA**.

250430C.jpg

250430D.jpg

- Price pressure eases.
- Spending rebounds after two soft months.

Personal Income, Consumption, and Prices in March

250430F20.jpg

250430G20.jpg

The Pending Home Sales Index, a forward-looking home sales measure based on contract signings, from the National Association of Realtors rose 6.1% to 76.5 (-0.6% y/y) during March after rising a little-revised 2.1% in February. These changes followed a 4.6% January decline.

The rise in March sales occurred as the rate on a 30-year mortgage eased to an average 6.65% from 6.84% in February. This rate was well above a low of 2.68% averaged in December 2020.

Pending home sales were up in most regions of the country. Sales in the Midwest rose 4.9% (1.4% y/y) last month after rising 1.8% in February. Sales in the South increased 9.8% (-0.4% y/y) following a 5.8% February rise. Sales in the West improved 4.8% (-2.0% y/y) after falling 3.0% in February. Sales in the Northeast were off 0.5% (-3.0% y/y) in March after falling 0.9% in February.

The pending home sales index measures sales at the time the contract for the purchase of an existing home is signed, similar to the Census Bureau's new home sales data. In contrast, the National Association of Realtors' existing home sales data are recorded when the sale is closed, which is usually a couple of months after the sales contract has been signed. In developing the pending home sales index, the NAR found that the level of monthly sales contract activity leads the level of closed existing home sales by about two months.

The series dates back to 2001 and are available in Haver's **PREALTOR** database. Weekly mortgage interest rates from the Mortgage Bankers Association can be found in the **WEEKLY** database.

- Sales rise to highest level in four months.
- Strength is evident throughout most of country.

U.S. Pending Home Sales Surge in March

Sandy Batten

250430F5.jpg

250430G5.jpg

The employment cost index (ECI) for civilian workers, arguably the most accurate measure of labor compensation in the United States, rose 0.9% q/q (3.6% y/y) in Q1, the same quarterly increase as in last year’s Q4, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The quarterly gains have fluctuated between 0.8% and 1.0% for the past six quarters. The Action Economics Forecast Survey had expected a 0.9% q/q increase and a 3.5% y/y gain.

Wages and salaries for civilian workers rose 0.8% q/q (3.5% y/y) in Q1, down from 1.0% q/q in Q4. This tied the Q3 2024 quarterly rise as the smallest increase since Q2 2021. It was also the smallest y/y increase since Q2 2021. Benefits increased by an outsized 1.2% q/q (3.9% y/y) in Q1 versus 0.8% q/q in Q4. This is the largest quarterly gain since Q2 2022. In general, employment cost gains remain above the pace observed prior to the pandemic but are slowing gradually.

Private industry workers’ compensation rose 0.8% q/q (3.4% y/y) in Q1, down from 0.9% q/q (3.6% y/y) in Q4. Wages and salaries for private industry workers increased 0.8% q/q (3.4% y/y) in Q1 versus 0.8% q/q (3.7% y/y) in Q4. The quarterly gain in Q1 tied that in Q3 2024 as the smallest increase since Q4 2020. Benefits for private industry workers jumped 1.2% q/q (3.6% y/y). the largest quarterly gain since Q2 2022. The acceleration in benefits in Q1 was primarily in service-producing industries.

Compensation in private goods-producing industries increased 1.0% q/q (3.2% y/y) in Q1, the largest quarterly gain in five quarters, versus a 0.7% q/q increase in Q4. Compensation in construction jumped 1.3% q/q, its largest quarterly increase since Q2 2022, up from a 0.6% q/q gain in Q4. Manufacturing compensation growth slowed to 0.7% q/q, its slowest quarterly advance since Q4 2020, from 0.8% q/q in Q4. Compensation in private service-producing industries increased 0.8% q/q (3.5% y/y), down slightly from a 0.9% q/q gain in Q4. Compensation in education and health services jumped 1.3% q/q, its largest quarterly gain since Q3 2023. In contrast, compensation in other services edged up 0.1% q/q in Q1, its smallest quarterly advance since before the pandemic.

The employment cost index measures the change in the cost of labor, free from the influence of employment shifts across occupations and industries. It is provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and is available in Haver’s **USECON** database. Consensus estimates from the Action Economics Forecast Survey are in Haver’s **AS1REPNA** database.

250430H5.jpg

250430I5.jpg

- Compensation grew 0.9 q/q in Q1, the same pace as in Q4.
- Wage growth slowed to 0.8% q/q while benefits surged 1.2% q/q, their largest quarterly increase since Q2 2022.

Employment Cost Growth Steady in Q1 2025

Kathleen Stephansen, CBE

250430J4.jpg

250430K4.jpg

The ADP National Employment Report indicated that nonfarm private sector payrolls rose 62,000 (1.4% y/y) during April after increasing 147,000 (1.4% y/y) during March, revised from 155,000. A 124,000 April rise in ADP employment had been expected in the Action Economics Forecast Survey.

Growth in median annual pay for "job stayers" eased to 4.5% y/y during April, from 4.6% y/y in March and from 4.7% y/y in the prior two months. Manufacturing sector pay grew 4.6% y/y during April, down from 4.8% y/y in March. Construction sector pay was unchanged at 4.7% y/y. Natural resource & mining sector pay grew 4.4% y/y. Financial sector pay rose 5.1% y/y, while education & health services pay rose 4.7% y/y. Leisure & hospitality pay also increased 4.7% y/y. Professional & business service sector pay increased 4.3% y/y as did trade, transportation & utilities pay. Information pay rose 4.1% y/y. Median annual pay for “job changers” rose 6.9% y/y after 6.7% y/y in March.

Small business hiring (less than 50 employees) rose 11,000 (0.6% y/y) after rising 18,000 (0.6% y/y) in March, revised down from 52,000. Employment at medium-sized firms (50-499,000 employees) rose 40,000 (1.1% y/y) after rising 43,000 (1.1% y/y). Large business hiring (500+ employees) rose 12,000 (3.4% y/y) in April, after rising 61,000 (3.6% y/y) in March, revised from 59,000.

Goods-producing employment rose 26,000 (1.3% y/y) in April, after rising 16,000 (1.3% y/y) during March, revised from 24,000. Manufacturing jobs rose 4,000 (-0.2% y/y) after rising 17,000 (-0.3% y/y) in March. The number of construction sector jobs rose 16,000 (3.4% y/y) in April, following a 2,000 (3.6% y/y) March increase, revised from 6,000. Natural resources & mining jobs rose 6,000 (2.8% y/y) in April after falling 3,000 (+1.9% y/y) in March.

The number of service-producing jobs rose 34,000 (1.4% y/y) during April, following a rise of 131,000 (1.4% y/y) in March. Professional & business services employment fell 2,000 (0.6% y/y) after rising 46,000 (0.7% y/y) in the prior month, revised from 57,000. Employment in the financial industry rose 20,000 (2.1% y/y) in April, after rising 38,000 (2.0% y/y) in March. Leisure and hospitality employment increased 27,000 (3.0% y/y), following a 23,000 (2.9% y/y) March increase, revised from 17,000. The number of education & health care jobs fell 23,000 (1.6% y/y) in April, following a 15,000 (1.8% y/y) rise in March, revised from 12,000. Information sector employment fell 8,000 (-0.1% y/y) after a rise of 3,000 (0.2% y/y) in March. The number of jobs in trade, transportation & utilities rose 21,000 (0.4% y/y) in April, after falling 4,000 (+0.4% y/y) in March, revised from a 6,000 fall. Employment in “other” services rose fell 1,000 (+3.2% y/y) following a 10,000 (3.4% y/y) rise in March, revised from 11,000.

By region, employment in the Northeast increased 10,000 (1.9% y/y) in April, following an increase of 95,000 (2.0% y/y) in March, revised from 89,000. Employment in the Midwest rose 42,000 (1.5% y/y) after a gain of 84,000 (1.4% y/y) in March, revised from 81,000. In the South, employment rose 3,000 (1.3% y/y) during April, after rising 10,000 (1.4% y/y) in March, revised from 27,000. In the West, employment rose 9,000 (0.6% y/y) after declining 43,000 (+0.6% y/y), revised from a 41,000 decline in March.

The ADP National Employment Report and Pay Insights data can be found in Haver's **USECON** database. Historical figures date back to January 2010 for private employment. Pay data date back to October 2020. The expectation figure is available in Haver's **AS1REPNA** database.

250430L4.jpg

250430M4.jpg

- Employment increase is modest in both services & factory sectors.
- Wage growth for “job stayers” moderates.
- Small and medium-sized business employment slows.

Economy in Brief: September 2004

Jump to:

2Q US GDP Growth Revised Higher

2Q US GDP Growth Revised Higher

Dutch Consumer Confidence Falls Slightly While Producer Confidence Rises Slightly: Both Are Well Above the Lows of 2003

Gasoline Prices Up as Crude Oil Nears $50 per Barrel

U.S. Chain Store Sales Again Battered By A Hurricane

Consumer Confidence Down

Consumer Confidence Down

Germany Business Confidence Falls Slightly in September: Retailers Particularly Pessimistic