Carol Stone, CBE

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/050526e.jpg" width="353">
Consumers in Sweden have been less optimistic over the past couple of months than earlier this year, according to the consumer confidence survey conducted by the National Institute of Economic Research (NIER) in Stockholm. The resulting consumer confidence indicator (&quot;CCI&quot;) was 5.9 in May and 6.5 in April after averaging 11.5 in Q1 2005. These are &quot;balance&quot; indicators, the net of &quot;better&quot; less &quot;worse&quot; responses.
The confidence survey consists of two kinds of questions, &quot;macro&quot; questions about the current and expected state of the Swedish economy generally and expectations about unemployment, and &quot;micro&quot; questions about the condition of personal finances now and expected and the willingness to make durable goods purchases. These two segments are telling very different stories. The Macro index has been negative almost continuously since early 2001, indicating a lack of confidence in the overall Swedish outlook. But people seem comfortable with their own situations, so that the Micro index has remained in a tight range averaging 12.5 over the last 15 months.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/050526f.jpg" width="353">
Notably, the Micro index correlates fairly well with Sweden&#39;s retail trade. Also reported today, the retail trade index from Statistics Sweden fell in April by 2.8%, but that followed a 2.2% gain in March. These sales, valued in real terms in fixed 2000 prices, are up 4.0% on a year ago. This is a bit slower than the last three years, but the store types with the less vigorous performance have been in the consumer staples area: food and personal products. The more cyclically sensitive durable goods are showing some strength, along with &quot;household products&quot;. It is seen in the second graph that durable goods sales have a high correlation with that CCI Micro Index, 73% over the last 13 years.
So the bifurcation of the confidence data is puzzling -- how could people be worried about an unfavorable unemployment picture in the year ahead, while being fairly comfortable with their own finances? At the same time, their relative comfort with what they experience for their own financial well-being is reflected in actions they take, that is in growing purchases of durable and household goods.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/NORDIC/@NS/@NS09/@NS09.HTM">Sweden</a></th>
<th scope="col">May 2005</th>
<th scope="col">Apr 2005</th>
<th scope="col">Mar 2005</th>
<th scope="col">Year Ago</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Consumer Confidence Indicator</td>
<td>5.9</td>
<td>6.5</td>
<td>10.7</td>
<td>4.9</td>
<td>8.7</td>
<td>0.9</td>
<td>7.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Macro Index</td>
<td>-19.0</td>
<td>-14.5</td>
<td>-12.0</td>
<td>-18.1</td>
<td>-12.6</td>
<td>-22.7</td>
<td>-7.3</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Micro Index</td>
<td>13.0</td>
<td>11.7</td>
<td>13.8</td>
<td>11.3</td>
<td>12.1</td>
<td>8.8</td>
<td>10.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Retail Trade (2000=100)</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>120.9</td>
<td>124.4</td>
<td>116.1</td>
<td>117.9</td>
<td>112.4</td>
<td>107.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; % Change</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>-2.8</td>
<td>2.2</td>
<td>4.0</td>
<td>4.8</td>
<td>4.5</td>
<td>4.6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Consumers in Sweden have been less optimistic over the past couple of months than earlier this year, according to the consumer confidence survey conducted by the National Institute of Economic Research (NIER) in Stockholm. The [...]

Consumer Confidence in Sweden Edges Lower, but Spending on Durable Goods Remains Strong

Tom Moeller

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/050526d.jpg" width="353">
The April Index of Help-Wanted Advertising from the Conference Board remained at 39. It fell in March from 41 during the prior two months.
During the last ten years there has been a 65% correlation between the level of help-wanted advertising and the three month change in non-farm payrolls.
The proportion of labor markets with rising want-ad volume improved to a still low 31% following the evaporation to 10% in March.
The Conference Board surveys help-wanted advertising volume in 51 major newspapers across the country every month.
The latest help wanted report from the Conference Board is available <a href="http://www.conference-board.org/economics/helpwanted.cfm">here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/CBDB/@C3/@C3.HTM">Conference Board</a></th>
<th scope="col">April</th>
<th scope="col">March</th>
<th scope="col">April &#39;04</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">National Help Wanted Index</td>
<td>39</td>
<td>39</td>
<td>38</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

The April Index of Help-Wanted Advertising from the Conference Board remained at 39. It fell in March from 41 during the prior two months. During the last ten years there has been a 65% correlation between the level of help-wanted [...]

Help-Wanted Advertising Flat

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/050526c.jpg" width="353">
Initial claims for unemployment insurance nudged 1,000 higher last week to 323,000 and the prior week&#39;s drop was lessened slightly to 19,000. Consensus expectations had been for 325,000 claims.
During the last ten years there has been a (negative) 75% correlation between the level of initial claims for unemployment insurance and the monthly change in payroll employment. There has been a (negative) 65% correlation with the level of continuing claims.
The four week moving average of initial claims was little changed at 300,500 (-2.7% y/y).
Continuing claims for unemployment insurance fell 22,000 and the prior week was revised down slightly.
The insured unemployment rate held at 2.0% for the fifth consecutive week.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/WEEKLY/@W5/@W507/@W507.HTM">Unemployment Insurance (000s)</a></th>
<th scope="col">05/21/05</th>
<th scope="col">05/14/05</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Initial Claims</td>
<td>323</td>
<td>322</td>
<td>-6.1%</td>
<td>343</td>
<td>402</td>
<td>404</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Continuing Claims</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>2,574</td>
<td>-12.7%</td>
<td>2,926</td>
<td>3,531</td>
<td>3,570</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Initial claims for unemployment insurance nudged 1,000 higher last week to 323,000 and the prior week's drop was lessened slightly to 19,000. Consensus expectations had been for 325,000 claims. During the last ten years there has been [...]

Initial Claims for Jobless Insurance Nudged Up

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/050526b.jpg" width="353">
US real GDP growth last quarter was revised up to 3.5% (AR) due to a halving of the subtraction from deterioration in the foreign trade deficit. Consensus expectations had been for a 3.7% advance.
Growth in corporate profits (w/IVA &amp; CCA) slowed to 4.5% (13.8% y/y) from 13.5% in 4Q04. The slowdown was due to a 0.8% (+17.6% y/y) decline in US nonfinancial corporate earnings. Growth in financial sector earnings also slowed by two thirds to 11.6% (13.9% y/y) while earnings from abroad rose 11.2% (2.2% y/y), the strongest gain since late 2003.
Profit margins fell for the first quarter in two years though they remained higher than during all of last year.
The drag on US output growth from a larger foreign trade deficit was reduced to 0.7 percentage points as growth in real imports was lowered to 9.1% (9.4% y/y) from 14.7%. Export growth was bumped up to 7.2% (5.9% y/y) from 7.0%.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/050526a.jpg" width="353">
The contribution to GDP growth from faster inventory accumulation was lowered to 0.8 percentage points. Nevertheless, the $25.9B rate of accumulation in the factory sector was the fastest since late 1999.
Domestic demand growth was left unrevised at 3.2%. Growth in business investment was lowered slightly to a weak 3.5% (10.8% y/y). That was offset by an upward revision to consumer spending to 3.6% (3.6% y/y) and residential building to 8.8% (7.4% y/y).
The chain price index was unrevised at 3.2%. The price index for domestic demand also was unrevised at 2.9%.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@E7/@E701/@E701.HTM">Chained 2000$, % AR</a></th>
<th scope="col">1Q &#39;05 (Prelim.)</th>
<th scope="col">1Q &#39;05 (Advance)</th>
<th scope="col">4Q &#39;04</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">GDP</td>
<td>3.5%</td>
<td>3.1%</td>
<td>3.8%</td>
<td>3.7%</td>
<td>4.4%</td>
<td>3.0%</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Inventory Effect</td>
<td>0.8%</td>
<td>1.2%</td>
<td>0.5%</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>-0.1%</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Final Sales</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>3.1%</td>
<td>1.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Foreign Trade Effect</td>
<td>-0.7%</td>
<td>-1.5%</td>
<td>-1.4%</td>
<td>-0.6%</td>
<td>-0.4%</td>
<td>-0.3%</td>
<td>-0.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Domestic Final Demand</td>
<td>3.2%</td>
<td>3.2%</td>
<td>4.5%</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>4.4%</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Chained GDP Price Index</td>
<td>3.2%</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>2.5%</td>
<td>2.2%</td>
<td>1.8%</td>
<td>1.7%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

US real GDP growth last quarter was revised up to 3.5% (AR) due to a halving of the subtraction from deterioration in the foreign trade deficit. Consensus expectations had been for a 3.7% advance. Growth in corporate profits (w/IVA & [...]

US GDP Growth Revised Up, Corporate Profit Growth Down

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/050526b.jpg" width="353">
US real GDP growth last quarter was revised up to 3.5% (AR) due to a halving of the subtraction from deterioration in the foreign trade deficit. Consensus expectations had been for a 3.7% advance.
Growth in corporate profits (w/IVA &amp; CCA) slowed to 4.5% (13.8% y/y) from 13.5% in 4Q04. The slowdown was due to a 0.8% (+17.6% y/y) decline in US nonfinancial corporate earnings. Growth in financial sector earnings also slowed by two thirds to 11.6% (13.9% y/y) while earnings from abroad rose 11.2% (2.2% y/y), the strongest gain since late 2003.
Profit margins fell for the first quarter in two years though they remained higher than during all of last year.
The drag on US output growth from a larger foreign trade deficit was reduced to 0.7 percentage points as growth in real imports was lowered to 9.1% (9.4% y/y) from 14.7%. Export growth was bumped up to 7.2% (5.9% y/y) from 7.0%.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/050526a.jpg" width="353">
The contribution to GDP growth from faster inventory accumulation was lowered to 0.8 percentage points. Nevertheless, the $25.9B rate of accumulation in the factory sector was the fastest since late 1999.
Domestic demand growth was left unrevised at 3.2%. Growth in business investment was lowered slightly to a weak 3.5% (10.8% y/y). That was offset by an upward revision to consumer spending to 3.6% (3.6% y/y) and residential building to 8.8% (7.4% y/y).
The chain price index was unrevised at 3.2%. The price index for domestic demand also was unrevised at 2.9%.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@E7/@E701/@E701.HTM">Chained 2000$, % AR</a></th>
<th scope="col">1Q &#39;05 (Prelim.)</th>
<th scope="col">1Q &#39;05 (Advance)</th>
<th scope="col">4Q &#39;04</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">GDP</td>
<td>3.5%</td>
<td>3.1%</td>
<td>3.8%</td>
<td>3.7%</td>
<td>4.4%</td>
<td>3.0%</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Inventory Effect</td>
<td>0.8%</td>
<td>1.2%</td>
<td>0.5%</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>-0.1%</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Final Sales</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>3.1%</td>
<td>1.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Foreign Trade Effect</td>
<td>-0.7%</td>
<td>-1.5%</td>
<td>-1.4%</td>
<td>-0.6%</td>
<td>-0.4%</td>
<td>-0.3%</td>
<td>-0.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Domestic Final Demand</td>
<td>3.2%</td>
<td>3.2%</td>
<td>4.5%</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>4.4%</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Chained GDP Price Index</td>
<td>3.2%</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>2.5%</td>
<td>2.2%</td>
<td>1.8%</td>
<td>1.7%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Initial Claims for Jobless Insurance Nudged Up 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom Moeller</a> May 26, 2005


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/050526c.jpg" width="353">
Initial claims for unemployment insurance nudged 1,000 higher last week to 323,000 and the prior week&#39;s drop was lessened slightly to 19,000. Consensus expectations had been for 325,000 claims.
During the last ten years there has been a (negative) 75% correlation between the level of initial claims for unemployment insurance and the monthly change in payroll employment. There has been a (negative) 65% correlation with the level of continuing claims.
The four week moving average of initial claims was little changed at 300,500 (-2.7% y/y).
Continuing claims for unemployment insurance fell 22,000 and the prior week was revised down slightly.
The insured unemployment rate held at 2.0% for the fifth consecutive week.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/WEEKLY/@W5/@W507/@W507.HTM">Unemployment Insurance (000s)</a></th>
<th scope="col">05/21/05</th>
<th scope="col">05/14/05</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Initial Claims</td>
<td>323</td>
<td>322</td>
<td>-6.1%</td>
<td>343</td>
<td>402</td>
<td>404</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Continuing Claims</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>2,574</td>
<td>-12.7%</td>
<td>2,926</td>
<td>3,531</td>
<td>3,570</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Help-Wanted Advertising Flat 
by <a href="/comment/Moeller.html">Tom Moeller</a> May 26, 2005


<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/050526d.jpg" width="353">
The April Index of Help-Wanted Advertising from the Conference Board remained at 39. It fell in March from 41 during the prior two months.
During the last ten years there has been a 65% correlation between the level of help-wanted advertising and the three month change in non-farm payrolls.
The proportion of labor markets with rising want-ad volume improved to a still low 31% following the evaporation to 10% in March.
The Conference Board surveys help-wanted advertising volume in 51 major newspapers across the country every month.
The latest help wanted report from the Conference Board is available <a href="http://www.conference-board.org/economics/helpwanted.cfm">here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/CBDB/@C3/@C3.HTM">Conference Board</a></th>
<th scope="col">April</th>
<th scope="col">March</th>
<th scope="col">April &#39;04</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">National Help Wanted Index</td>
<td>39</td>
<td>39</td>
<td>38</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/050525d.jpg" width="353">
GDP in Spain grew 0.9% in Q1, the same as in Q4, according to the quarterly data released this morning by the National Statistics Institute. Boosts to the quarter&#39;s performance came from government consumption, up 2.6%, and a drop in imports of 1.6%. Household consumption grew 0.6%, slower than in Q4, and capital formation also expanded more slowly. Exports decreased 1.7%, their second successive decline, pulling them down 2.5% compared to a year ago. However, an accompanying decrease in imports stabilized the real net export balance with the Q4 amount.
In today&#39;s report, Spain has switched to chain-linking for calculating quarterly real growth and inflation; the reference year for these calculations is 2000. The data previously used fixed 1995 weights. [Some annual data on the new basis were reported last week.] As seen in the graph and in the table below, growth is consistently higher in the new figures. In 2002 and 2003 this resulted from stronger gains in fixed investment, but through the last year or so, household consumption has been much more vigorous than under the former calculation scheme.<img align="right" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/050525e.jpg" width="353">
In the US experience, chain-weighting has a different impact: it tends to reduce total growth and, in particular, that of investment expenditures. It dilutes the effect of heavier buying of equipment, for which prices are falling. But in Spain, the reported volume of investment spending has been raised, perhaps because of the sizable role of construction in the Spanish economy. Construction is a considerably larger share of nominal GDP, 16.7% in Q1, than in the US, 10.2%. Construction prices have increased relative to total GDP, so that item has generally benefited from the chain-weighting process. Its greater weight in turn gives more lift to the total chain-weighted GDP result.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol">&nbsp;</th>
<th scope="col">Q1 2005</th>
<th scope="col">Q4 2004</th>
<th scope="col">Q3 2004</th>
<th scope="col">Year/ Year</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">GDP - 2000 Prices</td>
<td>0.9</td>
<td>0.9</td>
<td>0.7</td>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>2.9</td>
<td>2.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Memo: GDP - 1995 Prices</td>
<td>--</td>
<td>0.8</td>
<td>0.6</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>2.7</td>
<td>2.5</td>
<td>2.2</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Household Consumption</td>
<td>0.6</td>
<td>1.7</td>
<td>1.4</td>
<td>4.6</td>
<td>4.4</td>
<td>2.5</td>
<td>2.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Gross Fixed Capital Formation</td>
<td>0.9</td>
<td>3.4</td>
<td>2.2</td>
<td>6.5</td>
<td>4.4</td>
<td>5.3</td>
<td>3.3</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Exports</td>
<td>-1.7</td>
<td>-0.8</td>
<td>1.4</td>
<td>-2.5</td>
<td>2.8</td>
<td>3.6</td>
<td>1.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">Imports</td>
<td>-1.6</td>
<td>1.6</td>
<td>3.5</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>8.1</td>
<td>6.3</td>
<td>3.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

GDP in Spain grew 0.9% in Q1, the same as in Q4, according to the quarterly data released this morning by the National Statistics Institute. Boosts to the quarter's performance came from government consumption, up 2.6%, and a drop in [...]

Spanish GDP Growth Maintains Firm Pace; Chain-Linking Introduced

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/050525c.jpg" width="353">
Last week total mortgage applications recovered nearly half of the prior period&#39;s decline with a 4.3% gain that left applications so far in May 7.4% ahead of the April average, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.
The gain was led by a 6.4% rise in applications to refinance which are 11.3% higher than in April.
Applications to purchase a home rose 2.8% following the prior week&#39;s 10.8% slump, yet in May are 4.7% ahead of April. During the last ten years there has been a 50% correlation between the y/y change in purchase applications and the change in new plus existing single family home sales.
The effective interest rate on a conventional 30-year mortgage fell to 5.88%, the lowest level since mid February. The effective rate on a 15-year mortgage fell to 5.53%.
The Mortgage Bankers Association surveys between 20 to 35 of the top lenders in the U.S. housing industry to derive its refinance, purchase and market indexes. The weekly survey accounts for more than 40% of all applications processed each week by mortgage lenders. Visit the Mortgage Bankers Association site <a href="http://www.mbaa.org">here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/SURVEYW/@S5/@S5.HTM">MBA Mortgage Applications (3/16/90=100)</a></th>
<th scope="col">05/20/05</th>
<th scope="col">05/13/05</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">Total Market Index</td>
<td>729.6</td>
<td>699.2</td>
<td>15.4%</td>
<td>735.1</td>
<td>1,067.9</td>
<td>799.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Purchase</td>
<td>482.3</td>
<td>469.3</td>
<td>7.2%</td>
<td>454.5</td>
<td>395.1</td>
<td>354.7</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstcol">&nbsp; Refinancing</td>
<td>2,167.9</td>
<td>2,036.7</td>
<td>27.9%</td>
<td>2,366.8</td>
<td>4,981.8</td>
<td>3,388.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Last week total mortgage applications recovered nearly half of the prior period's decline with a 4.3% gain that left applications so far in May 7.4% ahead of the April average, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. The gain [...]

Mortgage Applications Recover

<html>
<head>
<style>
.odd{
 background-color:#edf5ff;
}
.even{
 background-color:#dde5ef;
}
.grey1{
	background-color:#f0f0f0;
}
.grey2{
	background-color:#e2e2e2;
}
.grey3{
	background-color:#d4d4d4;
}
.grey4{
	background-color:#c6c6c6;
}
.grey5{
	background-color:#b8b8b8;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
 



<img align="left" border="0" height="265" src="https://haver-commentaries.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/comments/050525b.jpg" width="353">
New single-family home sales in April rose just 0.2% m/m to 1.316M and the prior month&#39;s increase was more than halved. Nevertheless, sales in April set a record and for the year to date are 5.8% ahead of the 2004 average. Consensus estimates had been for sales of 1.325M.
Sales in the Northeast last month spurted by more than one third (28.9% y/y). In the West sales rose moderately (6.4% y/y) but in the Midwest sales fell for the third month this year (+1.0% Y/Y). In the South sales also fell by 5.3% (+20.2% y/y).
The median price of a new single family home recovered most of the prior month&#39;s decline and rose 6.1% to $230,800 (3.8% y/y).
The figures from the Census Department reflect homes sold.
The latest FOMC meeting minutes can be found <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/BoardDocs/Press/monetary/2005/20050524/default.htm"> here</a>.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<colgroup><col><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col" class="firstcol"><a href="http://www.haverselect.com/dlx/USECON/@E9/@E904/@E90401/@E90401.HTM">Homes Sales (000s, AR)</a></th>
<th scope="col">April</th>
<th scope="col">March</th>
<th scope="col">Y/Y</th>
<th scope="col">2004</th>
<th scope="col">2003</th>
<th scope="col">2002</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="firstcol">New Single-Family</td>
<td>1,316</td>
<td>1,313</td>
<td>13.3%</td>
<td>1,200</td>
<td>1,091</td>
<td>976</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

New single-family home sales in April rose just 0.2% m/m to 1.316M and the prior month's increase was more than halved. Nevertheless, sales in April set a record and for the year to date are 5.8% ahead of the 2004 average. Consensus [...]

New Home Sales Still on a Record Pace

USD/EUR exchange rate uncoupling from interest rate differential

Widespread downgrading of 2025 GDP outlook

Trade and fiscal policy uncertainty has exploded with the new administration

Much lower US electricity costs gives it a competitive advantage

Wage growth slowing in the US and Euro area; elevated and sticky in the UK

Stagflation-lite: Blue Chip forecasts below-trend growth and elevated inflation

US policy gyrations boosting policy uncertainty worldwide

Expected tariff hikes have boosted inflation expectations

US and Japan ended 2024 on solid ground in contrast to Europe

US economy expected to outperform other major economies in 2025

Only modest evidence of AI-related surge in US productivity growth

Previous Trump tariffs fading. A boost from new tariffs ahead?

Heavy US manufacturing states underperforming while Sun Belt states outperforming

Rising long-term yields a global phenomenon

US financial market concerns shifting from growth to inflation

Economic activity is picking up in the US but remains lackluster abroad

Policy uncertainty has surged since the US national elections.

Recent turnaround in US economic surprises leading to increases in rate-cut expectations

The outlook has brightened in the US, while it has dimmed for other major economies

Headline US PCE inflation elevated by sticky services prices

US and global equity prices have recently diverged

US leading global upturn in economic surprises

Blue Chip forecasters look for further significant monetary easing apart from Japan

Recent rise in global supply chain pressures could augur a pickup in global inflation pressures

Underperforming German economy generating increased policy uncertainty relative to Europe and the US

Our global data offering is unparalleled in terms of coverage, quality, and organization. We offer 290+ databases from 2500 government and private sources, a wealth of key survey and forecast data covering the world’s economies, and a robust offering of archive databases that drive machine learning for big data applications.

Optimized for precision analytics, our data is seamlessly integrated with Microsoft Office and all leading statistical packages through our DLX® software and platform independent HaverView™ website. We further offer direct database feeds, client server or cloud-based delivery, and RESTful API.


Privacy Policy

Disclaimer

Contact us

A premier time series data platform for the global strategy, research, and quant communities. 

New York

London

Singapore

Tokyo

Economy in Brief

Viewpoints

Contact Us

Our Data

Our Products

What We Do

Our Authors

About Us

Data News

Resources

Release Calendars

Training Center

Webinars

Newsletters

Download Software

For Clients

Live Updates

250430N1.jpg

250430O1.jpg

Real GDP eased 0.3% SAAR (+2.1% y/y) during the first quarter of 2025 after increasing 2.4% in Q4’24 and 3.1% in Q3’24. A 0.4% increase had been expected in the Action Economics Forecast Survey. It was the first decline since Q1 2022.

Foreign trade subtracted 4.83 percentage points from growth last quarter as imports surged 41.3% (13.4% y/y) ahead of tariffs, which began to come into effect in the first quarter. The rise followed a 1.9% decline in Q4’24. Exports rose 1.8% (3.0% y/y) after easing 0.2% in Q4. Inventories added 2.25 percentage points to growth after subtracting 0.84 percentage point from Q4 growth.

Real final sales to domestic purchasers grew 2.3% (2.9% y/y) in Q1 after rising 3.0% in Q4. Personal consumption expenditures rose 1.8% (3.1% y/y) following a 4.0% gain. Durable goods spending fell 3.4% (+5.3% y/y) after surging 12.4% in Q4. Motor vehicle purchases declined 11.1% (+5.5% y/y) after strengthening 19.7% in Q4. Spending on home furnishings & appliances gained 1.5% (6.1% y/y) following a 5.4% rise. Recreational goods & vehicle outlays rose 2.5% (7.0% y/y) last quarter after a 13.9% Q4 increase.

Nondurable goods outlays rose 2.7% (3.0% y/y) following 3.1% growth in Q4. Apparel spending increased 6.7% (2.5% y/y) following a 5.0% rise. Food & beverage buying gained 2.5% (2.3% y/y) after a 1.8% increase. Gasoline & fuel oil purchases increased 4.6% (3.4% y/y) after falling 2.0% in Q4.

Spending on services increased 2.4% last quarter (2.7% y/y) after a 3.0% gain. Outlays on housing & utilities increased 3.4% (1.8% y/y) after rising 1.1% in Q4. Health care expenditures rose 4.0% (4.8% y/y) following a 4.7% strengthening. Transportation outlays increased 5.3% (4.6% y/y) after a 3.7% rise while recreation spending rose 4.7% (2.8% y/y) following a 4.5% rise. Restaurant & hotel expenditures declined 2.1% (+0.5% y/y) following a 2.8% rise. Financial services expenditures rose 1.9% (2.0% y/y) after a 3.1% Q4 increase.

Business fixed investment increased 9.8% (3.6% y/y) following a 3.0% decline in Q4. Expenditures on structures rose 0.4% (-0.4% y/y) after a 2.9% increase. Expenditures on producers’ durable equipment jumped 22.5% (8.0% y/y) after falling 8.7%.  Outlays on information processing equipment soared 69.3% (18.9% y/y) following a 7.3% decline. Industrial equipment investment fell 1.4% (-0.3% y/y) after easing 0.9%. Intellectual property product spending rose 4.1% (1.8% y/y) following a 0.5% decline. 

Residential structures investment increased 1.3% (-0.1% y/y) in Q1 after a 5.5% Q4 rise.

250430P1.jpg

250430Q1.jpg

Government spending fell 1.5% (+2.4% y/y) after a 3.1% Q4 rise. Federal government expenditures declined 5.1% (+2.9% y/y) after rising 4.0% in Q4. National defense expenditures declined 8.0% (+4.0% y/y) after increasing 4.8% in Q4. State & local government spending rose 0.8% (2.1% y/y) following a 2.5% rise.

The GDP price index rose 3.7% (2.6% y/y) after increasing 2.3% in Q4. It was the largest increase since Q4’22. A 2.4% increase had been expected. The PCE chain price index increased 3.6% (2.5% y/y) following a 2.4% rise. The PCE price index excluding food and energy rose 3.5% (2.8% y/y) after increasing 2.6% in Q4. The business fixed investment price index rose 0.4% (1.8% y/y) after 1.5% rise. The residential price index strengthened 3.9% (3.2% y/y) after a 1.9% rise while the government price index increased 4.7% (2.8% y/y) following a 2.1% rise.

The GDP data can be found in Haver’s **USECON** and **USNA** databases. **USNA** contains virtually all of the Bureau of Economic Analysis detail in the national accounts. The Action Economics consensus estimates can be found in **AS1REPNA**.

250430R1.jpg

250430S1.jpg

- Decline in GDP is first in three years.
- Foreign trade subtracts substantially ahead of tariffs.
- Domestic final demand growth weakens.
- Price index strengthens with higher core PCE prices.

U.S. GDP Unexpectedly Declines in Q1’25; Prices Strengthen

Michael J. Moran

250430A.jpg

250430B.jpg

High-side readings on the price indexes for personal consumption expenditures in January and February caused some concern about emerging price pressure, especially with some policies of the Trump administration possibly adding to the upward force. However, March brought notable relief, with the headline price index falling slightly (-0.04%). A marked decline in energy prices was helpful (-2.7%), but core prices also were subdued, increasing less than 0.1%.  Year-over-year changes were still above the Fed’s target of 2%, but only barely so for the headline measure (2.3%). The core index backed away from the reading of 3.0% in February, but the latest reading of 2.7% was in line with observations in the past year, and still uncomfortably above target.

Consumers roused from a winter slumber in March, with nominal outlays increasing 0.7%. With inflation restrained, real outlays also posted a gain of 0.7%. Spending on durable gods stood out, with real outlays advancing 3.2%. Real outlays for both nondurable goods and services rose 0.4%, a solid pace. Signs of life were certainly welcome after an average decline of 0.1% in January and February. The March rebound left growth of 1.8% (annual rate) in the first quarter.

The brisk increase in spending in March was supported by a solid gain in personal income (0.5% in both nominal and real terms). Growth in wage income was firm at 0.5%, while proprietors’ income was robust with a gain of 1.8% (not annualized!). The farm sector led the advance in proprietors’ income, but the nonfarm sector also was strong (0.6%).

The personal income and consumption figures are available in Haver’s **USECON** database with detail in the **USNA** database. The Action Economics forecasts are in **AS1REPNA**.

250430C.jpg

250430D.jpg

- Price pressure eases.
- Spending rebounds after two soft months.

Personal Income, Consumption, and Prices in March

250430F20.jpg

250430G20.jpg

The Pending Home Sales Index, a forward-looking home sales measure based on contract signings, from the National Association of Realtors rose 6.1% to 76.5 (-0.6% y/y) during March after rising a little-revised 2.1% in February. These changes followed a 4.6% January decline.

The rise in March sales occurred as the rate on a 30-year mortgage eased to an average 6.65% from 6.84% in February. This rate was well above a low of 2.68% averaged in December 2020.

Pending home sales were up in most regions of the country. Sales in the Midwest rose 4.9% (1.4% y/y) last month after rising 1.8% in February. Sales in the South increased 9.8% (-0.4% y/y) following a 5.8% February rise. Sales in the West improved 4.8% (-2.0% y/y) after falling 3.0% in February. Sales in the Northeast were off 0.5% (-3.0% y/y) in March after falling 0.9% in February.

The pending home sales index measures sales at the time the contract for the purchase of an existing home is signed, similar to the Census Bureau's new home sales data. In contrast, the National Association of Realtors' existing home sales data are recorded when the sale is closed, which is usually a couple of months after the sales contract has been signed. In developing the pending home sales index, the NAR found that the level of monthly sales contract activity leads the level of closed existing home sales by about two months.

The series dates back to 2001 and are available in Haver's **PREALTOR** database. Weekly mortgage interest rates from the Mortgage Bankers Association can be found in the **WEEKLY** database.

- Sales rise to highest level in four months.
- Strength is evident throughout most of country.

U.S. Pending Home Sales Surge in March

Sandy Batten

250430F5.jpg

250430G5.jpg

The employment cost index (ECI) for civilian workers, arguably the most accurate measure of labor compensation in the United States, rose 0.9% q/q (3.6% y/y) in Q1, the same quarterly increase as in last year’s Q4, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The quarterly gains have fluctuated between 0.8% and 1.0% for the past six quarters. The Action Economics Forecast Survey had expected a 0.9% q/q increase and a 3.5% y/y gain.

Wages and salaries for civilian workers rose 0.8% q/q (3.5% y/y) in Q1, down from 1.0% q/q in Q4. This tied the Q3 2024 quarterly rise as the smallest increase since Q2 2021. It was also the smallest y/y increase since Q2 2021. Benefits increased by an outsized 1.2% q/q (3.9% y/y) in Q1 versus 0.8% q/q in Q4. This is the largest quarterly gain since Q2 2022. In general, employment cost gains remain above the pace observed prior to the pandemic but are slowing gradually.

Private industry workers’ compensation rose 0.8% q/q (3.4% y/y) in Q1, down from 0.9% q/q (3.6% y/y) in Q4. Wages and salaries for private industry workers increased 0.8% q/q (3.4% y/y) in Q1 versus 0.8% q/q (3.7% y/y) in Q4. The quarterly gain in Q1 tied that in Q3 2024 as the smallest increase since Q4 2020. Benefits for private industry workers jumped 1.2% q/q (3.6% y/y). the largest quarterly gain since Q2 2022. The acceleration in benefits in Q1 was primarily in service-producing industries.

Compensation in private goods-producing industries increased 1.0% q/q (3.2% y/y) in Q1, the largest quarterly gain in five quarters, versus a 0.7% q/q increase in Q4. Compensation in construction jumped 1.3% q/q, its largest quarterly increase since Q2 2022, up from a 0.6% q/q gain in Q4. Manufacturing compensation growth slowed to 0.7% q/q, its slowest quarterly advance since Q4 2020, from 0.8% q/q in Q4. Compensation in private service-producing industries increased 0.8% q/q (3.5% y/y), down slightly from a 0.9% q/q gain in Q4. Compensation in education and health services jumped 1.3% q/q, its largest quarterly gain since Q3 2023. In contrast, compensation in other services edged up 0.1% q/q in Q1, its smallest quarterly advance since before the pandemic.

The employment cost index measures the change in the cost of labor, free from the influence of employment shifts across occupations and industries. It is provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and is available in Haver’s **USECON** database. Consensus estimates from the Action Economics Forecast Survey are in Haver’s **AS1REPNA** database.

250430H5.jpg

250430I5.jpg

- Compensation grew 0.9 q/q in Q1, the same pace as in Q4.
- Wage growth slowed to 0.8% q/q while benefits surged 1.2% q/q, their largest quarterly increase since Q2 2022.

Employment Cost Growth Steady in Q1 2025

Kathleen Stephansen, CBE

250430J4.jpg

250430K4.jpg

The ADP National Employment Report indicated that nonfarm private sector payrolls rose 62,000 (1.4% y/y) during April after increasing 147,000 (1.4% y/y) during March, revised from 155,000. A 124,000 April rise in ADP employment had been expected in the Action Economics Forecast Survey.

Growth in median annual pay for "job stayers" eased to 4.5% y/y during April, from 4.6% y/y in March and from 4.7% y/y in the prior two months. Manufacturing sector pay grew 4.6% y/y during April, down from 4.8% y/y in March. Construction sector pay was unchanged at 4.7% y/y. Natural resource & mining sector pay grew 4.4% y/y. Financial sector pay rose 5.1% y/y, while education & health services pay rose 4.7% y/y. Leisure & hospitality pay also increased 4.7% y/y. Professional & business service sector pay increased 4.3% y/y as did trade, transportation & utilities pay. Information pay rose 4.1% y/y. Median annual pay for “job changers” rose 6.9% y/y after 6.7% y/y in March.

Small business hiring (less than 50 employees) rose 11,000 (0.6% y/y) after rising 18,000 (0.6% y/y) in March, revised down from 52,000. Employment at medium-sized firms (50-499,000 employees) rose 40,000 (1.1% y/y) after rising 43,000 (1.1% y/y). Large business hiring (500+ employees) rose 12,000 (3.4% y/y) in April, after rising 61,000 (3.6% y/y) in March, revised from 59,000.

Goods-producing employment rose 26,000 (1.3% y/y) in April, after rising 16,000 (1.3% y/y) during March, revised from 24,000. Manufacturing jobs rose 4,000 (-0.2% y/y) after rising 17,000 (-0.3% y/y) in March. The number of construction sector jobs rose 16,000 (3.4% y/y) in April, following a 2,000 (3.6% y/y) March increase, revised from 6,000. Natural resources & mining jobs rose 6,000 (2.8% y/y) in April after falling 3,000 (+1.9% y/y) in March.

The number of service-producing jobs rose 34,000 (1.4% y/y) during April, following a rise of 131,000 (1.4% y/y) in March. Professional & business services employment fell 2,000 (0.6% y/y) after rising 46,000 (0.7% y/y) in the prior month, revised from 57,000. Employment in the financial industry rose 20,000 (2.1% y/y) in April, after rising 38,000 (2.0% y/y) in March. Leisure and hospitality employment increased 27,000 (3.0% y/y), following a 23,000 (2.9% y/y) March increase, revised from 17,000. The number of education & health care jobs fell 23,000 (1.6% y/y) in April, following a 15,000 (1.8% y/y) rise in March, revised from 12,000. Information sector employment fell 8,000 (-0.1% y/y) after a rise of 3,000 (0.2% y/y) in March. The number of jobs in trade, transportation & utilities rose 21,000 (0.4% y/y) in April, after falling 4,000 (+0.4% y/y) in March, revised from a 6,000 fall. Employment in “other” services rose fell 1,000 (+3.2% y/y) following a 10,000 (3.4% y/y) rise in March, revised from 11,000.

By region, employment in the Northeast increased 10,000 (1.9% y/y) in April, following an increase of 95,000 (2.0% y/y) in March, revised from 89,000. Employment in the Midwest rose 42,000 (1.5% y/y) after a gain of 84,000 (1.4% y/y) in March, revised from 81,000. In the South, employment rose 3,000 (1.3% y/y) during April, after rising 10,000 (1.4% y/y) in March, revised from 27,000. In the West, employment rose 9,000 (0.6% y/y) after declining 43,000 (+0.6% y/y), revised from a 41,000 decline in March.

The ADP National Employment Report and Pay Insights data can be found in Haver's **USECON** database. Historical figures date back to January 2010 for private employment. Pay data date back to October 2020. The expectation figure is available in Haver's **AS1REPNA** database.

250430L4.jpg

250430M4.jpg

- Employment increase is modest in both services & factory sectors.
- Wage growth for “job stayers” moderates.
- Small and medium-sized business employment slows.

Economy in Brief: May 2005

Jump to:

Consumer Confidence in Sweden Edges Lower, but Spending on Durable Goods Remains Strong

Help-Wanted Advertising Flat

Initial Claims for Jobless Insurance Nudged Up

US GDP Growth Revised Up, Corporate Profit Growth Down

US GDP Growth Revised Up, Corporate Profit Growth Down

Spanish GDP Growth Maintains Firm Pace; Chain-Linking Introduced

Mortgage Applications Recover

New Home Sales Still on a Record Pace