Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics

Economy in Brief: April 2007


  • The net profitability of all private nonfinancial corporations in the United Kingdom was 15.5% in the fourth quarter of 2006. This rate was up from 15.2% in the third quarter and was the highest quarterly rate since the series began in the first quarter of 1989, as can be seen in the first chart, which shows net and gross profitability of U.K. corporations. Net profitability is defined as the net rate of return on capital employed. That is, it is the value of profits, allowing for depreciation, divided by the value of inventories and the depreciated value of fixed assets. Gross profitability is defined as the gross return on capital employed, that is, the value of profits before depreciation charges divided by the value of inventories and fixed assets before depreciation . These tend to be lower than the net rates of return, as shown in the first chart. While the net profitability of Continental Shelf companies (companies engaged in the extraction of oil and gas) declined to 33.5% from 37.3% in the third quarter, the profitability of the nonshelf companies rose to 14.7% from 14.2% in the third quarter. The rates of return for the Continental Shelf corporations are more volatile than those of the nonshelf corporations as can be seen in the second chart. The volatility of the Continental Shelf corporations is due, in large part, to variations in the prices of oil and gas.

    Of the nonshelf companies, it is the corporations engaged in the service industries that have accounted for the rise in the overall profitability of the private nonfinancial companies. Net profitability in the service and manufacturing industries are compared in the third chart. Rates of return in the manufacturing industry tend to be lower than those in the service industries due, in part, to the greater capital intensity of the manufacturing industry relative to that of the service industry corporations, but the gap between rates of return in the manufacturing and service industries has widened as profitability in the service industries has improved and that in the manufacturing industries deteriorated.

    NET PROFITABILITY OF PRIVATE NON  FINANCIAL CORPORATIONS IN THE UK (%)Q4 20 06Q3 20 06Q4 20 05Q/Q DifY/Y Dif200620052004
    All Corporations15.515.214.30.31.215.114.314.2
    Continental Shelf Corporations33.537.340.6-3.8-7.140.734.125.1
    Nonshelf Corporations14.714.213.00.51.713.913.413.5
       Manufacturing Corporations10.06.99.93.10.18.59.39.7
       Service Industry Corporations20.919.517.91.43.019.717.917.4
    · The Euro area 13 PPI rose by 0.3% in February. Excluding energy the rise was 0.3% as well. Trends show that PPI inflation pressures are elevated. And while the PPI is not the main focus of ECB policy, the pressure on prices is widespread across main EU countries. The bank of England has even recently said it was going to look beyond headline inflation as legacy issues might damp that calculation in the coming months. Central banks are becoming more concerned about embedded inflation pressures.
    Euro area and UK PPI Trends

     M/MSAAR
    Euro area 13Feb-07Jan-073-Mo6-MOYr/Yr
    Total (Excl Construction) 0.3%0.2%2.1%0.2%2.9%

    yes">   Excl Energy

    0.3%0.5%3.4%2.7%3.4%
    Capital Goods0.1%0.5%2.9%2.3%2.0%
    Consumer Goods0.2%0.3%2.4%1.2%1.6%
    Intermediate & Capital Goods0.3%0.6%3.9%3.4%4.4%
    Energy0.4%-0.7%-1.8%-7.5%1.0%
    Manufacturing0.4%0.1%2.3%-0.4%2.5%
    Germany0.3%0.0%1.0%0.3%2.8%

    yes">  Excl Energy

    0.3%0.2%2.2%2.4%3.0%
    France0.3%0.1%1.1%-0.7%2.0%

    yes">  Excl Energy

    0.2%0.5%2.2%1.9%2.8%
    Italy0.4%0.0%2.4%0.2%4.0%

    yes">  Excl Energy

    0.3%0.6%4.3%3.0%4.2%
    UK-0.8%-1.4%-6.7%1.4%-1.4%

    yes">  Excl Energy

    0.4%0.5%3.7%3.1%3.4%
    Euro area 13 Harmonized PPI excl Construction.
    The EA 13 countries are Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia and Spain
    6COLSPAN
    Euro Area and UK PPI Trends
    by Robert Brusca April 3, 2007

    Trend across categories and countries do not show a steadily accelerating inflation rate that central banks would clearly abhor. But they do show that pressures that had dissipated have re-emerged in the 3-month inflation rates. Excluding energy, inflation trends across the main countries show the same tendency except in Germany and in France where the pace of PPI ex-energy inflation is staying fairly constant, just above the 2% pace.

    The headline inflation rate is moving steadily lower, but ex-energy inflation is considerably more stubborn around 3.5%, well above the ECB ceiling rate of 2% (for the HICP).

  • Japan's Tankan released today showed that the headline large manufacturers' business condition DI (Diffusion Index) declined to 23% in March from 25% in December. These same firms forecast that the DI would decline further in June to [...]


  • As you can tell from the chart on the left the sense of there being separate business cycles in the US and in Europe is a sort of joke. The US and Euro area manufacturing indexes are plotted on top of one another and their sense of co-variation is unmistakable. Also the US is shown to be the male and E-zone is the female; that is to say, if we regard this as a dance, the US leads.

    In the recent mini-cycle, Europe has struck out a bit on its own. A US up-cycle from mid-2005 aborted early, turning to decline. Meanwhile, Europe has continued to expand and only recently has hit a plateau with hint of erosion. In the US, the down-cycle is only showing early signs of stabilization.

    yes"> We wonder if Europe needs the US more than the US needs Europe?

    The table above shows hath the E-zone readings, while off peak, are still very high in the range they have occupied since Mid-1997. The overall index is in the top 30% of its range and stands 6% above its average. Orders are similarly strong. Supplier deliveries are showing the weakest relative performance 10% below their average of the period.

            Placing NTC Euro-Zone Readings in their Respective Ranges
     Since June'98
    NTC E-zoneCurrentStd DevAverageSD% AvgMAXMINRangePercentile% of AVG
    NTC Index55.43.852.57.360.542.917.571.1106
    New Orders56.44.653.58.762.441.021.472.3105
    Backlogs53.93.152.05.957.647.210.564.1104
    Production57.44.254.27.762.843.019.972.8106
    Supplier Deliveries42.54.847.210.156.934.722.235.190
    Inventories48.71.048.32.050.446.24.358.9101
    Prices (Pd)66.19.859.716.476.537.738.873.3111
    Employment52.92.949.85.856.044.211.873.9106
    New Export Orders55.34.352.88.160.039.420.677.5105
    Note: From June 1997 to Date; except back logs since Nov '02

    The leading components of the NTC E-zone index are showing mixed trends. We form these trends as the difference between the 3 month and six month indexes. Supplier deliveries and prices-paid are turning up while new orders and order backlog trends are eroding.

    On balance, we can see the strong US-Europe linkages or commonalities. The history looks as though the US cycle gets transmitted to Europe, but Europe is recently showing some independent strength. However, it is also showing some sign of decay. It hardly seems as though a further rise in the Euro can do any good for Europe. But, so far so good.


  • The chart on the left shows the ISM clearly has broken through the up trend from its recession recovery and now is in a well-established downtrend. Its recent up-tick is still in the grip of that down-trending range. The table below shows the ISM and its components with a number of statistics that describe it/them. A quick perusal of the table shows why I like to evaluate the ISM by looking at the values in the LAST TWO columns instead of seeing if the index is above 50 (Rising) or below it (Falling). Each of these ISM components has a different range variability characteristic, range of values and mean. Even with the ISM above 50, as it is this month, it is still only in the 46th percentile of its range and at 96% of mean.

    Only inventories, prices and the trade-related components are above their mean values. Employment, at 99% of its mean, is nearly there.

    So while the ISM indicates expansion in the lexicon of the ISM we can see it is indeed a still wounded report that shows manufacturing is not yet up to par.Commentary Archive


  • The chart on the left shows the ISM clearly has broken through the up trend from its recession recovery and now is in a well-established downtrend. Its recent up-tick is still in the grip of that down-trending range. The table below shows the ISM and its components with a number of statistics that describe it/them. A quick perusal of the table shows why I like to evaluate the ISM by looking at the values in the LAST TWO columns instead of seeing if the index is above 50 (Rising) or below it (Falling). Each of these ISM components has a different range variability characteristic, range of values and mean. Even with the ISM above 50, as it is this month, it is still only in the 46th percentile of its range and at 96% of mean.

    Only inventories, prices and the trade-related components are above their mean values. Employment, at 99% of its mean, is nearly there.

    So while the ISM indicates expansion in the lexicon of the ISM we can see it is indeed a still wounded report that shows manufacturing is not yet up to par.

                            Placing ISM Readings in their Respective Ranges
     Since June 1998
    ISMCurrentStd DevAverageSD%AvgMAXMINRangePercentile% of AVG
    PM Index50.95.353.210.063.240.522.745.896
    New Orders51.66.755.812.071.338.432.940.193
    Backlogs47.06.750.413.466.536.030.536.193
    Production53.06.355.711.470.038.631.445.995
    Supplier Deliveries51.35.054.29.268.145.422.726.095
    Inventories47.53.945.88.653.637.116.563.0104
    Prices (Pd)65.512.662.120.388.032.056.059.8105
    Employment48.75.949.312.060.335.125.254.099
    New Export Orders55.53.553.66.660.244.315.970.4104
    Import Orders57.53.654.66.661.546.914.672.6105
    Avg Days Lead For:Since June 1998
    Production Material45.03.247.16.955.038.017.041.296
    Capital Expenditure110.08.7107.18.1120.086.034.070.6103
    Maint., Repair, & Ops22.02.122.59.529.017.012.041.798
    Note: From April 1991 to Date; except back logs since Jan 1993

  • The chart on the left shows the ISM clearly has broken through the up trend from its recession recovery and now is in a well-established downtrend. Its recent up-tick is still in the grip of that down-trending range. The table below shows the ISM and its components with a number of statistics that describe it/them. A quick perusal of the table shows why I like to evaluate the ISM by looking at the values in the LAST TWO columns instead of seeing if the index is above 50 (Rising) or below it (Falling). Each of these ISM components has a different range variability characteristic, range of values and mean. Even with the ISM above 50, as it is this month, it is still only in the 46th percentile of its range and at 96% of mean.

    Only inventories, prices and the trade-related components are above their mean values. Employment, at 99% of its mean, is nearly there.

    So while the ISM indicates expansion in the lexicon of the ISM we can see it is indeed a still wounded report that shows manufacturing is not yet up to par.

                            Placing ISM Readings in their Respective Ranges
     Since June 1998
    ISMCurrentStd DevAverageSD%AvgMAXMINRangePercentile% of AVG
    PM Index50.95.353.210.063.240.522.745.896
    New Orders51.66.755.812.071.338.432.940.193
    Backlogs47.06.750.413.466.536.030.536.193
    Production53.06.355.711.470.038.631.445.995
    Supplier Deliveries51.35.054.29.268.145.422.726.095
    Inventories47.53.945.88.653.637.116.563.0104
    Prices (Pd)65.512.662.120.388.032.056.059.8105
    Employment48.75.949.312.060.335.125.254.099
    New Export Orders55.53.553.66.660.244.315.970.4104
    Import Orders57.53.654.66.661.546.914.672.6105
    Avg Days Lead For:Since June 1998
    Production Material45.03.247.16.955.038.017.041.296
    Capital Expenditure110.08.7107.18.1120.086.034.070.6103
    Maint., Repair, & Ops22.02.122.59.529.017.012.041.798
    Note: From April 1991 to Date; except back logs since Jan 1993
    A rose is a rose is a rose (Existentialism) Arroz es arroz es arroz (Rice is rice) MFG is MFG is MFG (The law of global linkages)
    by Robert Brusca April 2, 2007

    As you can tell from the chart on the left the sense of there being separate business cycles in the US and in Europe is a sort of joke. The US and Euro area manufacturing indexes are plotted on top of one another and their sense of co-variation is unmistakable. Also the US is shown to be the male and E-zone is the female; that is to say, if we regard this as a dance, the US leads.

    In the recent mini-cycle, Europe has struck out a bit on its own. A US up-cycle from mid-2005 aborted early, turning to decline. Meanwhile, Europe has continued to expand and only recently has hit a plateau with hint of erosion. In the US, the down-cycle is only showing early signs of stabilization.

    yes"> We wonder if Europe needs the US more than the US needs Europe?

    The table above shows hath the E-zone readings, while off peak, are still very high in the range they have occupied since Mid-1997. The overall index is in the top 30% of its range and stands 6% above its average. Orders are similarly strong. Supplier deliveries are showing the weakest relative performance 10% below their average of the period.

            Placing NTC Euro-Zone Readings in their Respective Ranges
     Since June'98
    NTC E-zoneCurrentStd DevAverageSD% AvgMAXMINRangePercentile% of AVG
    NTC Index55.43.852.57.360.542.917.571.1106
    New Orders56.44.653.58.762.441.021.472.3105
    Backlogs53.93.152.05.957.647.210.564.1104
    Production57.44.254.27.762.843.019.972.8106
    Supplier Deliveries42.54.847.210.156.934.722.235.190
    Inventories48.71.048.32.050.446.24.358.9101
    Prices (Pd)66.19.859.716.476.537.738.873.3111
    Employment52.92.949.85.856.044.211.873.9106
    New Export Orders55.34.352.88.160.039.420.677.5105
    Note: From June 1997 to Date; except back logs since Nov '02
    Tankan Survey Shows Overall Confidence Holding Steady: Business Confidence Declines in Large Japanese Manufacturing Firms, But Rises in Non Manufacturing Firms 
    by Louise Curley April 2, 2007

    The leading components of the NTC E-zone index are showing mixed trends. We form these trends as the difference between the 3 month and six month indexes. Supplier deliveries and prices-paid are turning up while new orders and order backlog trends are eroding.

    On balance, we can see the strong US-Europe linkages or commonalities. The history looks as though the US cycle gets transmitted to Europe, but Europe is recently showing some independent strength. However, it is also showing some sign of decay. It hardly seems as though a further rise in the Euro can do any good for Europe. But, so far so good.

    Japan's Tankan released today showed that the headline large manufacturers' business condition DI (Diffusion Index) declined to 23% in March from 25% in December. These same firms forecast that the DI would decline further in June to 20%. The DI for non manufacturing large firms, on the contrary, remained steady in March at 22% and forecast that it would rise to 22% in June. The first two charts compare the actual results and forecasts for large manufacturing and non manufacturing firms.

    As noted in the JAPAN data base, major revisions in the Tankan survey have created a discontinuity in the series beginning with the first quarter of 2004. The old series is maintained by Haver as a DISCONTINUED series. While the two series are not comparable, the old series is useful in that it provides some perspective in which we can judge the recent data. We have plotted the actual conditions of large manufacturing firms in the new and the DISCONTINUED series. While the recent data are less robust than those of the nineties, they are significantly above those of the decade or so of sub par Japanese economic activity, as shown in the third chart.

    Fixed investment expenditures by large manufacturing firms are forecast to increase more slowly, from 2.8% to 2.5%, in the current fiscal year; those by the large non manufacturing firms are set to increase 3.1% from 1.6% last year. The fourth chart shows in forecasted increases in fixed investment by large firms.

     JAPANESE TANKANQ2 06Q1 06Q4 05Q3 05Q2 05Q1 05
    Business Conditions Forecasts Large Firms (Percent Balance)
      Manufacturing202221222219
      Non Manufacturing232121211917
    Business Conditions Actual Large Firms Percent Balance
      Manufacturing --2325242120
      Non Manufacturing--2222202018
    Fixed Investment Expenditures
    % Change 
    2007200620052004
      Manufacturing4.43.44.82.5----
      NonManufacturing -4.1-0.31.63.1----