Economy in Brief: July 2022

Money slows as credit grows… faster Money illusion is an economic term for the distortion that occurs when a significant difference develops between the money cost of an item and the economic burden of purchasing it. For example, I have joked that inflation has made me stronger because I did not used to be able to go to the store and so easily carry home $100 worth of groceries. The illusion in this example is that $100 worth of groceries is the same thing it used to be. Of course, I am not stronger. Inflation has not made me stronger. Inflation has made my load lighter by causing $100 to purchase less than it used to. Money illusion is meant to clarify the fallacy of thinking that your wages are really higher or that your income is higher because they have risen in dollar terms when inflation is growing faster than your wages or income are rising and when your purchasing power has fallen.

To clarify those points, I have created the table below that looks in the upper panel at nominal growth rates for money and credit and then directly below on the same frequencies creates growth rates for the inflation-adjusted (real) flows.

The nominal flows in the upper panel show that money supply is decelerating in the European Monetary Union; it grew at 7.7% over three years, at a 6.8% pace over two years, and at a 6.1% pace over 12 months, but over three months the annualized growth rate is now down to 4%. There is also a deceleration in the real balances on those same same timelines. Three-year real balance money supply growth in the EMU is 4% and over two years it's 1.5%, but over 12 months it's declining at a 2.3% annual rate, and over three months the money stock in real terms is falling at a 3.2% annual rate.

In both cases, money supply is decelerating. So in some sense, you could say that the signal is the same; however, since economists think that the absolute growth rate of money supply matters, there's a big difference between saying that money is growing at a 4% annual rate over three months or that the real money stock is declining at a 3.2% annual rate over three months.

Clearly the ECB policy has been tightening regarding money supply. Skipping past the credit columns for the moment, we see the same thing going on for money supply growth in the U.S. and in the UK, and to a lesser extent in Japan. The U.S. money stock decelerates from a huge 13.7% growth rate over three years to a decline at a 1.3% annual rate over three months. The U.S. real money stock grows at an 8.3% annual rate over three years but is now shrinking at an 11.1% annual rate over three months (yikes!). The U.K. shows money growth over three years at a 7.8% pace, decelerating to a 2.7% annual rate over three months. The U.K. real money stock grows at a 4.1% pace over three years and is now declining at a 10.2% annual rate over three months. Japan’s nominal money stock grows at a 5.5% pace over three years and slows to a 3.5% pace over three months. Over three years Japan’s real money stock rose at a 4.8% annual rate; over three months the real money stock in Japan is still growing but has slowed to a 0.7% annual rate. Japan had much lower inflation than elsewhere, as result its distortions and the unwinding of its distortions creates less distress.

These statistics make it clear that money supply has slowed, and that the real money stock is falling in most of the major money center countries. Looking at interest rates alone may hide the degree of tightening that we're seeing on the part of central banks. Of course, this judgment is always complicated because the money figures that are reported are called ‘money supply’ but they are, of course, the result of supply and demand interactions in the marketplace that occur as the central bank sets the short-term interest rate. So, for any given interest rate, if demand is shifting, that can cause a change in the money growth rate even as the central bank holds the nominal interest rate target steady. It's highly likely with the weakening economy in Europe that money demand is weakening and that the weakening that we see in the growth rates of the money stock reflect not just to squeezing by the central bank but also a pullback in money holding patterns on the part of the public.

The euro area offers an interesting presentation on what is going on with credit demand. Credit to residents in the European Monetary Union is up at a 3.9% annual rate over three years; that drifts down to 3.8% over two years but then ratchets up to a 5.4% annual rate over 12 months and further to 6.7% at an annual rate over three months. However, credit - deflated for the effects of inflation - shows three-year growth at a 0.3% pace falling to -1.3% pace over two years and falling to -3% over 12 months, then it ‘speeds up’ slightly to fall at a slightly slower -0.8% pace over three months. What we see here is that as nominal money supply has slowed, nominal credit growth has increased. This may be evidence that the tighter credit policies in the EMU are starting to work and that transactors have been forced into the credit market to borrow to meet their business and personal needs. While real money supply (demand?) is falling sharply in the EMU, real credit growth has also started to fall but is falling at a slower pace as nominal credit speeds up.

The same trends pertain to private credit in the EMU where the three-year growth rate for nominal credit is at a 4.2% pace; that accelerates to a 7.1% annual rate over three months against real credit balances that rise at a 0.6% rate over three years then drop to a -0.4% pace annualized over three months. The private sector in these credit statistics shows signs of being under stress and needing to increase credit use to stay afloat. I make this judgment rather than a judgment that the economy is speeding up and increasing its credit demands because the underlying economic statistics show there is economic slowing in place. When there is economic slowing, monetary tightening, and an increase in credit demand it is much more likely to be the product of distress.

At today's meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), the Fed announced a 75-basis point increase in the target range for the Federal funds rate to 2.25% - 2.50%. It was the second consecutive 75-basis point move and placed the rate at the highest level since July 2019, up from a low near zero in mid-March.

The Fed has raised the funds rate at four consecutive meetings. The latest move was in line with expectations in the Action Economics Forecast Survey and it was endorsed by each member of the FOMC.

Fed Chairman Jerome H. Powell indicated that "From the standpoint of our Congressional mandate to support maximum employment and price stability, the current picture is plain to see: The labor market is extremely tight, and inflation is much too high."

The statement which accompanied today's action indicated that the Fed "anticipates that ongoing increases in the target range will be appropriate. In addition, the Committee will continue reducing its holdings of Treasury securities and agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities.

The Fed also indicated that "Recent indicators of spending and production have softened. Nonetheless, job gains have been robust in recent months, and the unemployment rate has remained low. Inflation remains elevated, reflecting supply and demand imbalances related to the pandemic, higher food and energy prices, and broader price pressures."

The statement issued following today's meeting can be found here.

The distributive trades survey for the United Kingdom shows broad weakness in July for the retail sector and broad weakness for volumes in the wholesale sector as well. The expectations readings for both portions of the survey show weak current standings as well as a weakening outlook.

Retailing The retail sector in July shows a -4 reading for sales compared to one-year ago; that is a slight improvement from -5 in June, but it deteriorates from -1 in May. Orders, compared to one year ago, log a -13 reading in July, down from -8 in June and 2 in May. Sales evaluated for the time of year perform better with a - 9 reading in July compared to a -19 reading in June and a reading of zero in May. The stock sales relationship shows an increase to 29 in July from 12 in June and 11 in May. The standings for these four metrics show sales compared to a year ago with a 24.6 percentile standing, orders compared to a year ago with a 20.8 percentile standing, sales for the time of year at a 38.7 percentile standing, and the stock sales relationship at a very high 95.4 percentile standing indicating potentially that inventories are becoming overbuilt.

Looking ahead at expectations for retail performance, in August expected sales compared to a year ago dive to a -14 reading from -2 in July. Orders log a much weaker -28 compared to a -10 in July. Sales for the time of year log a -6 reading which is a significant improvement from -25 in July while the stock sales ratio climbs to 25 from 12 in July. Ranking these standings, expected sales compared to a year ago have a weak 11.6 percentile standing, expected orders for a year ago have a weak 6.3 percentile standing, sales for the time of year have a better, but still quite weak, 37.2 percentile standing; the expected stock sales ratio is very strong with a 97.2 percentile standing. On balance, retailing and its outlook remain quite weak.

Wholesaling The distributive trade assessment for wholesaling shows sales compared to a year ago at -13 in July, weaker than June’s rating and a sharp reversal from 30 in May. Orders compared to a year ago are up to an 11 reading in July, higher than a reading of 1 in June but well short of a reading of 19 in May. Sales for the time of year fell to a reading of 9 in July compared to 20 in June and 41 in May. The stock-sales relationship in July is at 10 which is up from -8 in June and is even with 10 in May. The percentile standings for wholesale sales data are generally firmer than they are for retailing in June but for the most part still weak with sales compared to a year ago at a 15.8 percentile standing, orders compared to a year ago have a 53.2 percentile standing; that is above the historic median. Sales for the time of year have a 43-percentile standing while the stock sales relationship has a 38-percentile standing.

Looking at expectations for wholesaling in August, expected sales fall sharply to a - 18 reading from 9 in July and stronger values in June and May. Orders compared to a year ago fall to zero in August compared to 8 in July and much stronger values in June and May. Sales for the time of year fall to a -11 reading from 12 in July and much stronger readings in June and in May. The stock sales relationship logs a 10 reading in August which is up sharply from -6 in July and readings close to zero in June and May. There is clear and sharp deterioration compared to May and June.

Neither the retailing nor the wholesaling portions of the survey are very reassuring. The best standing in the series apart from the stock sales relationship comes from a marginally above median reading for wholesaling orders compared to a year ago. Everything else shows weakness compared to historic median standings. Given the situation for the economy and in Europe, this is not surprising.