Introducing

Robert Brusca

Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media. Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.

Publications by Robert Brusca

Europe| Jan 16 2026
Big Four Inflation in EMU 2025-Final
The European Monetary Union has concluded a year of weak-to-moderate growth with inflation largely toeing the line. As always, the inflation picture is more complicated than a simple statement. When we look at inflation, we look at the headline, we look at the core, to make sure that the volatile food & energy elements aren't dominating the index, and then we look across some of the main participants to see if the trend for inflation is shared broadly across the largest countries in the Monetary Union. When we apply those kinds of standards, the grading for the year is reduced. However, based on the headline alone, it was an excellent year for the ECB.

Headline Inflation in 2025 Headline inflation in 2025 rose by 2%, exactly on the target of the European Central Bank. It rose over six months at a 2% annual rate and then concluded the year over the last three months, rising at a 1.6% annual rate with some margin below the target set by the central bank itself.

Country Headline Inflation Trends On a country basis, the performance is not nearly as good. While year-on-year results look pretty good, with Germany at 2%, France at 0.7% and Italy at 1.3%, Spain comes in at 3.1%. So the three largest monetary union economies come in at or below 2% with Spain as a rogue observation. When we look further at the sequence of inflation within the year, we see Germany at 2% over 12 months, rising to 3.1% over 6 months, rising further to 4% over 3 months. Inflation is accelerating at the end of the year even as Germany hits the target! This is something to keep an eye on. For France, the inflation rate also accelerates slightly but stays below the bar of 2% over three months, six months, and 12 months. For Italy, inflation is decelerating from 1.3% over 12 months to -0.3% over six months, and then inflation in Italy is contracting at a 1.9% annual rate over three months. Spanish inflation shows clear trouble with a 3.1% 12-month pace, rising to 4.6% at an annual rate over six months, and rising further to 5.9% at an annual rate over three months.

Core Inflation For core inflation, the Monetary Union’s consolidated numbers are not yet compiled. However, for the four largest economies, we do have core or ex-energy inflation. For Germany, it's inflation excluding energy. On that basis, German inflation is 2.2% over 12 months, it rises to 2.7% over six months, then falls back to a 2% annual pace over three months All-in-all not a bad performance. For France, core inflation is below 2% over 12 months, six months, and three months. In Italy, once again, we see inflation decelerating: Italian inflation is 2% over 12 months - right on the ECB target. It falls to a 1.3% annual rate over six months and then falls further to a 0.3% annual rate over three months. For Spain, the core has another very difficult story for the Monetary Union. Inflation is 2.7% over 12 months, it rises to 3.1% over six months and stays at an annual rate of about 3% over three months. This is too high and it looks stubborn, particularly because it is the core.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Europe| Jan 15 2026
EMU IP – Has the Worm Turned?
Industrial output in the European monetary union rose by 0.7% in November for the second month in a row. Manufacturing output jumped to an increase of 0.9% after rising by 0.3% in October. By sector, output in consumer goods fell by 0.8%, as consumer durables output fell by 1.3%, and consumer nondurables output fell by 0.6%. However, intermediate goods output rose by 0.3% and capital goods output rose by 2.8%.

Sequential trends Sequentially output in the euro area is looking much stronger with the 2.6% gain over 12 months, a 1.2% annual rate gain over six months and at a smashing 7.1% annual rate gain over three months. For manufacturing, the 12-month pace is 12.5%, the rate of change over six months is 0.4% at an annual rate, while over three months, manufacturing output is rising at a 4.1% annual rate.

Component growth Component growth is mixed with consumer goods output overall showing negative growth rates over three months and six months, consumer durables transition from declining growth to positive growth over three months while consumer nondurables show positive growth over 12 months, transitioning to progressively weaker six-month and three-month rates of growth. Intermediate goods, however, show acceleration in train with three-month growth at 6%, up from 1.1% over 12 months, and with capital goods output progressively rising from 3.3% over 12 months, to a 14.5% annual rate over three months.

Quarter-to-date results Today's report is through November; quarter-to-date industrial production is up at a 4.4% annual rate, with manufacturing up at 1.4% annual rate. The total industrial production growth rate has the historic ranking in its 65.5 percentile and manufacturing growth only ranks at its 55th percentile. Only two sectors, consumer durables, and (barely for) intermediate goods are the growth rates below their historic medians which means their rankings are below their respective 50th percentiles.

Country level trends Across countries we still see a great deal of weakness with the median EMU reporter showing an output decline of 0.1%. However, Germany has progressed to show a 2.1% increase in November and has logged three straight months of output increases of over 1%. For Germany the 12-month, to six-month, to three-month growth rates have progressed from an annual rate of 1.2%, to 3.9% over six months, to a 22.1% annual rate over three months.

Mixed results monthly To be sure, there are more outsized declines across countries than there are increases. Spain posts an 8.5% output decline on the month. Luxembourg posts a 6.9% decline, with Greece and Portugal each logging declines of 3%; however, in all these cases, these negative growth rates in November are reversing or blunting positive growth rates in October. Countries logging strong growth rates in November are Germany at 2.1%, Italy at 1.1%, and Ireland at 1.4%. Outside of the monetary union, Sweden has a gain of 6% and Norway a month-to-month gain of 3.2%. Germany, Italy, Greece, and Sweden exhibit accelerating growth from 12-months to six-months, to three-months. Luxembourg and Ireland exhibit steadily decelerating growth.

Stronger results on balance sequentially Output growth rates over 12 months, six months, and three months, across monetary union members show over half of them accelerating over the sequential span within the last year. Monthly data from the monetary union and other European reporters remain somewhat inconsistent; however, it's also true we're coming off a very strong October and so the weak monthly November numbers may not be very meaningful. However, this is still leaving us with what are essentially very strong sequential growth rates, from 12-months to six-months to three-months across this group of countries. On a quarter-to-date basis among the 14 countries in the table, only three are reporting quarter-to-date declines in output in progress. Year-over-year growth rates for these countries show standings below their 50th percentile for only four of them, and for Finland the reading is only technically below 50% at 49.6%.

There's a reasonable case being made for the notion that the European Monetary Union is embarking on a revival especially because it seems to be underpinned by Germany which is showing a very strong last three months, very strong sequential growth rates and has logged in addition to this a firm GDP growth rate, after wallowing in recession.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Finland| Jan 14 2026
Inflation in Finland Continues Dive Below 2%
When inflation fell in the post COVID. Finish inflation slipped easily below the 2% mark and then accelerated rather strongly but continued to remain below 2% most of the time until recently. In September of last year, Finish inflation once again made a strong move below 2%. The harmonized inflation rate over 12 months for Finland is 1.3% in October, 1.5% in November, and 1.7% in December. These are all 12-month, year-over-year gains. From October through November, Finland’s core measure of the HICP also has been below 2%.

In December, Finland's HICP measure kicked up its heels to log a 0.3% gain after rising 0.2% month-to-month in November and falling by 0.5% in October. Among the 9 categories that make up the detailed national CPI that's released at the same time as the HICP, four of the components showed gains less than 0.2% with three components showing gains of 0.6% or more on a monthly basis. This followed a November report in which seven of the nine categories and the national index itself showed month-to-month declines and where 55% of the categories decelerated from October. By comparison, in December 85% of the categories accelerated relative to November, but then given the weak nature of the November report, that's not particularly surprising. October had been another month of extremely disciplined prices with the headline HICP falling by 0.5% month-to-month and with six declines in monthly prices, against accelerations in only 35% of the categories. Clearly Finland has been in a period when inflation has been extremely tempered.

Sequential trends showed that the HICP headline measure is up by only 1.7% over 12 months although it's up at a 5.9% annual rate over six months and then up by only a 0.1% annual rate over three months. Inflation accelerates for 40% of the categories over 12 months compared to 12-months ago, it accelerates over 6 months compared to 12-months for 60% of the categories, and it accelerates over 3 months compared to 6-months only 30% of the categories. The year-over-year and three-month performances shows a great deal of inflation discipline in Finland.

The rankings, or queue standings, of the inflation rates show the headline, which is up 1.7% over 12 months at a 56.1 percentile ranking over that period back to 2001. That places the measure on slightly above its median on data back to 2001. The national index, however, is up by only 0.2% over that span. And it has a 14.3 percentile weight extremely weak among the components in the domestic price index: five of them have rankings above the 50-percentile mark overall on 12-month changes back to 2001. The greatest increases are in health & medical care with a 90.4 percentile standing, recreation & culture prices have an 81.7 percentile standing, communication has 83-percentile standing, education has a 55.2 percentile standing, and food & nonalcoholic beverages are close to the median at a 50.4 percentile standing. The weakest prices on the standing basis are housing, fuel & light at an 8.7 percentile standing and as well as other goods & services at a 5.7 percentile standing.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Japan| Jan 13 2026
Japan’s Economy Watchers Survey in December 2025
Japan’s economy watchers index at year-end weakened slightly, but the future index strengthened slightly to counterbalance the drop-off. The December current index is weaker than it was in October as well, as is the headline for the future index. But the queue, or rank, standings of these indexes show the current index at a 60th percentile standing and a queue standing for the future index at its 70th percentile. Despite the end of year give back, the index headline readings are still, for the most part, firm-to-solid.

The Current Index That is an assessment about the rankings of the December data compared to their respective histories back to end 2004- a twenty-year period. However, in terms of the diffusion values of the index per se, the current index has only two readings above the 50 mark indicating actual expansion. Expansion is the rule in current services industries and in nonmanufacturing, a broader sector dominated by services. Employment and readings for corporations overall both show readings close to neutral with diffusion at 49.2 or better, but still short of 50. Current retail at 46.5 is the weakest sector and shows the second weakest diffusion reading.

The current index standings on employment has a reading below 50%- and that is despite having a diffusion reading near 50 -nearly unchanged employment month-to-month. That diffusion reading for December is a low relative to its own history. The strongest two sectors on rankings are services and eating & drinking places with standings in the 70-percentile range. Apart from the weak employment standing, the weakest rankings are in the range of the lower sixty percentiles with only retailing lower, in its 56.5 percentile, manufacturing at its 61.7 percentile.

The Future Index The Future index has a slightly higher queue standing than the current index as noted above, but it is not vastly different. No future components rankings are below their 50%, but again, employment is weakest with a ranking in its 50th-percentile and with housing in its 53rd percentile. Nonmanufacturing and services have the highest queue standings.

In terms of diffusion readings as opposed to standings, the future index headline is above 50 unlike for the current headline. Six of nine observations in December have future readings in their respective 50.6 percentiles. The weakest future reading, housing, with a 46.2 reading, is followed by retailing and eating & drinking places, each at 49.6. But the above-50 readings ae not strong per-se either. The strongest is the services sector at 52.4, then nonmanufacturing at 51.7, followed by employment at 51.4 (and it has the weakest queue standing among future readings). Corporations have a diffusion reading at 50.9, households at 50.3, and manufacturers at 50.2. And that 50.2 reading for manufacturers has a 70.4 percentile standing.

Always remember that diffusion and the rank standings are different things and very different concepts even though they are both measured as percentages; they can be quite different. Various series have different histories and tendencies. Not too surprisingly the current and future diffusion readings are highly correlated (0.96) while the standings are not so well correlated in December between the current and future (0.37). The correlation I speak about above between diffusion and standing is at 0.20 for the current readings in December but is higher at 0.53 for the December future components.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Switzerland| Jan 12 2026
Swiss Confidence Sags at End-2025
Swiss consumer confidence at end-2025 (in Q4) fell to -34.5 from -32.7 in 2025-Q3. The average level for the confidence reading on data back to 1982 is -16.7 and the current queue standing is 13.9%. The Q4 reading is clearly weak- well below its own average and weaker than this month, less than 15% of the time.

Outlook confidence in Q4 fell to -44.9 from -38.0 in Q3, registering a 15.6 percentile standing. The past confidence reading at -61.2 at end-2025 is down from -43.5 at the end of the third quarter. The standing for this reading is in its 19th percentile. All of these are extremely weak readings.

People provide a job security response in Q4 that eases to -50.1, still well above its historic average of -58.2 for a queue ranking at its 57th percentile.

Personal financial readings are moderate to weak across the board. However, current financial conditions rose to 38.4 in Q4 from 35.2 at the end of Q3 and a queue standing above its median at its 56th percentile. But the outlook for financial conditions is much weaker and also weakened quarter-to-quarter to -31.4 in Q4 from a level of -28.6 in Q3 to a queue ranking in its 8.7 percentile. The evaluation of past financial conditions improved by a very small margin, rising to -38.3 in Q4 from -38.7 in Q3, and to a queue standing at the 11.6 percentile.

The spending environment in Switzerland improved slightly but remained weak, rising to -23.3 in Q4 from -25.5 in Q3 to a standing at their 23.1 percentile standing.

The best part of the report is that the perception of job security is above average, and the current financial situation is above its median. After that, all the individual assessment metrics are weak including overall confidence – everything except assessments for inflation.

On the inflation front, the price outlook is high, rising to a reading of 97.7 in Q4 from 95.8 in Q3 but is still below the second quarter reading at 113.1. The price outlook has a moderately high standing at its 70.5 percentile. This standing is slightly below the standing for prices past which is at 76.3%. The past metric was still rising in the fourth quarter but was weaker than its reading in both Q1 and Q2 of 2025.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Germany| Jan 09 2026
German Industrial Production Perks Up-Surprise!
German industrial production advanced by 0.8% month-to-month in November performing better than had been expected. Consumer goods output fell by 0.3% month-to-month, capital goods output soared with a 4.9% gain, while intermediate goods output fell back by 0.8%.

On the whole, manufacturing output had been expected to be weak. But looking at manufacturing alone, rather than total industrial production, the gain was even stronger at 2.1% month-to-month. Real manufacturing orders in November rose by 5.6%, real sales in manufacturing rose by 2.7%. This is solid performance.

Survey data have been weak and listless However, apart from anecdotal evidence, as monthly data unfold, the kinds of numbers that we have to look at first are various economic surveys that come from diffusion data. The ZEW’s current index was slightly stronger month-to-month at a still very weak -78.7 (net) reading compared to -80 in October although both of those were weaker than the ZEW net September reading of -76.4. IFO manufacturing weakened month-to-month in November at 87.1 compared to 88.1 in October and it was slightly weaker than its September value as well. IFO manufacturing expectations slipped to 94.1 in November from 96.9 in October although expectations were slightly higher than their level in September. The EU Commission index weakened in November to -18.9 from -18.1 in October although there was an improvement from -20.1 in September.

These comparisons show us that the survey data which we had in hand before getting the industrial production reading from Germany had given us a lot of weak readings and a lot of very weak momentum.

Compare survey data to IP data using ranking technique We can compare industrial production data to survey data using two different columns in this table. The first is the queue standing column where we see the industrial production data with rankings mostly in their 50th percentile: intermediate goods have a ranking of 37.7% with construction at 33.4%; they are the weaker exceptions. We rank IP data by sector according to their annual growth rates compared to past growth rates. However, by comparison the survey data (that we rank on levels) range between 12.1% and 29.8%; all of those are very weak readings. No wonder a focus on survey data leads to a weak upcoming assessment of production data. We can also look at a slightly more up-to-date, but shorter ranking, from January 2021. There we see that the industrial production data average rankings from the mid-60th percentile up to the 81.4 percentile for total industrial production. Surveys generally have rankings in the 20th and 30th percentile with the exception of IFO manufacturing expectations which reaches 67.8%, which is a solid reading.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Europe| Jan 08 2026
EU Indexes for EMU Weaken at Year-End
The EU indexes for December 2025 showed slight slippage as the overall index fell to 96.7 from 97.1 in November for the whole of the European Monetary Union. Sectors showed slippage in consumer confidence and retailing; confidence slipped to -13.1 in December from -12.8 in November as the retail rating slipped to -7 in December from -6 in November. The services sector and the industrial sector were each unchanged on the month, with the industrial reading at a net standing of -9 and the services reading at +6. Improving month-to-month was construction where the index rose to a -1 in December from -2 in November.

Queue standings of sectors The queue (or rank) standings for the overall reading as well as the sector readings largely cluster around the lower one-third of the range of values on data back to 1985, where applicable. Retailing and construction are exceptions, with retailing at an above-median standing at a 51.3 percentile and construction at a solid and strong 81.6 percentile standing in December. The weakest reading is for consumer confidence at the 23.1 percentile standing followed by the industrial sector at a 30.5 percentile standing; services check in at a 37.9 percentile standing. The rank standing for the overall monetary union is at 34.4%, just slightly above the bottom one-third mark for all ranked observations over the period.

Country results 18 countries report detail in this survey. Seven of the 18 showed declines in December; this is up substantially from November when five showed declines and compares to October when eight countries showed declines. An unfortunate feature of December is that the headline reading for the monetary union weakens as well as readings for each of the four largest monetary union economies Germany, France, Italy, and Spain.

The two largest monetary union economies, Germany and France, have the weakest rank standings among the BIG4 with Germany at a 15.7 percentile standing and France at a 29.5 percentile standing. Italy and Spain each have standings above the 50% mark placing them above their medians for Italy with a reading of 54.2 percentile, while for Spain it's a 61.2 percentile standing.

Standings across smaller economics Across the remaining monetary union countries, six of the 14 readings are above their 50th percentile, while eight of the 14 are below their 50th percentile. Well, the large countries are experiencing a significant split; the rest of the monetary union appears to be in much the same condition, with approximately half of them performing at above-median conditions and half performing at below-median conditions.

Country stories The chart of the monetary union indexes by sector shows us that there has been little change and little trend in these observations. Across countries Germany has definitely been the weakest country among the BIG4, while Italy has been the strongest. Inflation data have showed inflation beginning to heat up in Spain, and Spain does have the strongest queue standing among the four largest monetary union economies - so that might be something to keep an eye on going forward. Conditions in Germany and France are still quite weak and seem unlikely to force an increase in inflation.

Smaller economies- some specifics And so, the rest of the monetary union economies show tiny Malta, which is hardly a price-maker, has a strong 99.6 percentile standing, followed by 70th percentile standings in Greece and then Lithuania. Portugal and Cyprus have readings in their 60th percentiles. For the most part, these are modest readings but above their medians, of course. Among the weak economies in the rest of the union, the weakest is Belgium with a 16.9 percentile standing, followed by Estonia at a 28.4 percentile standing, Luxembourg at a 32.8 percentile standing, and Austria at a 33-percentile standing. After that, Finland’s standing goes to 37.7 percentile with the Netherlands, Slovakia, and Latvia all with readings in their 40th percentiles indicating moderate undershooting relative to their respective medians.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Global| Jan 07 2026
Inflation in the Euro Area Is Warm but Well-Behaved at Year-End
Inflation in the euro area as 2025 draws to a close has pretty much behaved. The HICP gauge for the European Monetary Union, that's targeted at a pace of 2% is closing the year with a 12-month pace of 2% which is exactly what the ECB is looking for. Success is at hand! Congrats to the ECB!

It’s like the super bowl playoffs: a victory, but more games lie ahead However…oh yes there is almost over an ‘however’ or ‘none-the-less’ or some other insidious phrase inevitably is inserted to introduce a caveat… and that is this: over six months the headline pace is at 2.4% at an annual rate, and over three months the pace is at 2.2% at an annual rate. Still, the year-over-year inflation rate is how central banks normally are judged and it has come in right on target, and the ECB can claim a large measure of victory for that even as it faces the challenge for 2026.

Visiting 2% or setting down roots? At the same time, inflation is only closing in on the 2% target over other horizons. It has not generally proven itself to be stable at 2%, having spent most of its time at a pace above 2% for the past year as the chart shows.

So far so good... The monthly numbers have been encouraging with the December gain in the HICP at 0.2%. Germany logged a gain of 0.1%, month-to-month, France and Italy had gains of 0.2%, while Spain is at 0.4%. Spain, where inflation had been pretty-well contained, has now moved over to the rogue side of the ledger. Spain posted inflation at 3% year-over-year, at a 4.5% annual rate over six months, and at a 5.7% annual rate over three months. Other monetary union countries showed more disciplined patterns. For example, France has a 0.7% gain year-over-year with a 1.2% annual rate gain over six months, and a 1.1% annual rate gain over three months. All of them, of course, are gains well within the ECB's desired result for the union as a whole. Italy shows a tendency toward deflation at a 1.3% HICP gain over 12 months that shifts to a decline of 0.3% at an annual rate over six months, and to a decline of 1.9% at an annual rate over three months. The other troublesome country among the Big-Four economies in EMU is Germany where the 2% headline achievement over 12 months is right on top of the target the ECB seeks; however, it gets there with a 3.1% annual rate increase over six months and a 4% annual rate of increase over three months. Both of those gains, of course, are over the line and indicate accelerating inflation even as German inflation ends the year at 2% and is ‘seemingly’ compliant.

Core inflation is a slightly different animal Germany gives us an early look at inflation excluding energy. Italy and Spain give us core measures to look at early in the year. The December results show ex-energy inflation in Germany at 0.1% month-to-month, Italian core inflation at 0.3%, and Spanish core inflation at 0.2%. This followed a batch of similarly well-behaved numbers in November for these three countries (see Table). The core sequential inflation rates are generally better behaved for these three countries than for their headline rates. Germany's metric excluding energy comes in at 2.2% for the year but it accelerates at a 2.7% pace over six months and then it's back down to 2% over three months. Italy shows a compliant 2% pace over 12 months, then it slides to a 1.5% annualized over six months and slips further to a 0.7% pace over three months, echoing the deflation trend that we see in Italy's headline pace. For Spain, the core also exhibits accelerating inflation trends to join what it reports for the headline as the year-over-year core pace is at 2.6%, the six-month rate steps up to 3.1% annualized, and stays in that neighborhood at a 2.9% annualized rate over three months.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Global| Jan 06 2026
S&P Total PMIs A Mixed Bag As 2025 Ends
The S&P total or composite PMIs demonstrated a tendency to weakness in December as 64% of the 25 reporting countries reported weaker readings in December than in November. However, even with that bit of bad news on the table, the number of jurisdictions that reported PMI readings below 50 indicating economic contraction had gone to zero, indicating that there were no contracting jurisdictions in December. That's an improvement from two contracting in November and three in October. In those previous months, for example, in October, only 36% of the reporting entities were weaker month-to-month; in November, only 40% were weaker month-to-month so the step up to 64% weaker month-to-month in December was a big step-up in weakness; however, it comes after a period when conditions had generally been improving and now that has stopped.

Sequential trends: 12-months to 6-months to 3-months Sequential data that look at performance over three months, six months and 12 months compared to earlier periods show that, over three months only 34.8% of the jurisdictions were weaker compared to six-months. Over six months only 26.1% were weaker compared to 12-months. However, 12-months was a period of treading water because over 12 months compared to 12-months ago, about 48% of the reporters were weaker indicating that conditions over the past year had been largely unchanged. But over shorter periods of time conditions had been improving.

Contraction is less common At the same time, sequential data showed that there has been an improvement in terms of the number of jurisdictions that are showing contraction because there were five of them over 12 months, four of them over six months and only two of them over here months.

Standings/rankings The queue percentile standings show eight jurisdictions below 50% which means that on data from January 2021, only eight of the twenty five reporters are below their median result for that period. Egypt, Kenya, Sweden, and the United States have percentile standings in their 90th percentile marking them as very strong composite standings compared to where they have been over the last five years. There were also strong rankings in a relative sense in Western Europe with the European Monetary Union in its 81st percentile, Germany in its 81st percentile, France in its 81st percentile, and Hong Kong in its 83rd percentile, indicating strength spread across various areas but concentrated in Europe. On the weak side, there are extremely weak readings that are offered by Qatar that has an 11.9 percentile standing, in India that has a 19-percentile standing, the UAE with a 31-percentile standing, and China with the 38th percentile standing. These are relative standings that is they are not a ranking of the PMI values compared to other countries, but rather comparing to each individual country over the whole time series of values since January 2021 with its own performance. China, for example, has a 51.3 composite reading for December 2025, and while that's roughly a lower 1/3 reading compared to where it's been historically, it isn't a particularly weak reading compared to what other countries are reporting in December 2025. China, for example, ranks 17th out of 25 countries (approx. bottom one-third position) reporting data in December 2025. In the case of China, its timeseries and cross-section standing are very similar in ranking terms.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Spain| Dec 30 2025
Spanish Inflation Flares at Year-End
When inflation numbers come hot off the griddle, some part of them might stick to the pan. That's the case this month with Spain’s release of inflation in December. It provides us with the headline for the HICP measure, a headline to the domestic measure, and the domestic measure excluding energy. But it does not release the sector detail for the rest of the report.

However, based upon what's been released, it’s clear that inflation in Spain has picked up. The part of the core that we have in-hand, which is just the portion excluding energy, still appears to be fairly well behaved; however, its gain is still slightly excessive.

HICP trend Spain’s HICP measure in December rose 0.4% after rising by 0.5% in both October and November; those are hot numbers. That translates into a 5.7% annual rate over three months which is hotter than its pace of 4.5% over six months which in turn is hotter than the 12-month increase of 3%. The HCP headline for Spain has clearly been accelerating, the year-over-year rise is too-hot, and the shorter-term metrics are hotter still. This is not good news, and this is not a welcome progression.

Domestic inflation Looking at Spain’s domestic CPI conditions, we find that they are still on the hot side with December showing a headline gain of 0.3% but gains in October and November of 0.5% each, producing a three-month annual rate of 5.4%, which is hotter than its 4.2% over six months, which, in turn, is hotter than the year-over-year gain at 2.9%. And these patterns/results are very similar to the pattern and the readings for the HICP. The domestic inflation picture is too hot over 12 months and accelerating over the shorter periods.

Domestic inflation ex-energy: The CPI excluding energy is not as bloated as the HICP or the domestic headline, but it is still a reading on rough terrain. Over 12 months, inflation excluding energy rises at a 2.6% annual rate; that's above the 2% pace sought by the ECB for the community as a whole. Over six months, the reading ramps up to a 3.1% annual rate, again moving the wrong direction and a reading at 3.1% is simply too hot. Over three months, there's a slight deceleration compared to six months but still a rate that is too hot, at 2.9%, and stronger than the 12-month pace. Core inflation is better behaved than headline inflation and both the domestic and the HICP frameworks, but inflation is unruly overall and, for the most part, showing either acceleration or at least a 3-month pace stronger than its 12-month pace. None of this is what the ECB is looking for or trying to achieve.

Beyond the missing details The details of the Spanish report are missing for December because the data are too preliminary for the authorities to post. However, if we look at the sequential pace of inflation over 12 months, six months, and three months on a lagged basis, it is looking at data that are up-to-date through November rather than through December what's the numbers that are generally excessive and they show too much acceleration moving from 12-months to 6-months to 3-months. Over 12 months compared to a year ago, five of nine categories show inflation accelerating. Over 6 months compared to 12 months, four categories are accelerating. Over 3 months compared to 6 months, six of the nine categories are accelerating. These acceleration tendencies are worrisome.

In addition, over 12 months, six of nine categories have a pace above 2%. Over 6 months, six of nine categories have annualized gains above 2%, and over 3 months, the lagged data show six of nine categories with gains above 2%. Only apparel shows inflation tempered on all horizons (at or below 2%). Food, housing, transport, education and other all show above 2% inflation on all horizons.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Sweden| Dec 29 2025
Sweden’s Trade; Exports Surge as Imports Recede
Swedish exports advanced month-to-month for the second month in a row while imports continued on a losing streak declining by 0.9% in November.

Exports have gradually been firming with exports falling by 6.1% over 12 months, rising at an annual rate of 4.8% over six months, and then rising at a 3.9% annual rate over three months. Exports are not on a steady acceleration path, but they have transitioned from a year-over-year growth rate that's negative to moderate positive short-term rates of growth.

Swedish imports, on the other hand, are weakening relatively sharply. Imports were down 4.4% over 12 months, down at a 1.2% annual rate over six months, and falling at a 17% annual rate over three months.

The global trade picture remains somewhat mixed. The Baltic Dry goods index, which is an indicator of global trade volume, has backed off of its highs but continues to post relatively steady volume indications. However, the S&P global manufacturing survey has been showing weakness; when manufacturing is weak, typically international trade is weak as well. Swedish trade may be picking up some of that weakness as well.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
USA| Dec 22 2025
Canadian Retail Sales Drop and Growth Falters
Canadian retail sales and other growth metrics appear to be weakening as the year draws to a close. Inflation has firmed up as well. Retail sales in October saw a month-to-month drop of 0.2% as supermarket sales fell 0.7%, month-to-month, clothing store sales fell 1.2%, and retail excluding motor vehicle sales fell by 0.6%. Overall real retail sales fell by 0.6% in October from September. This is the second consecutive month in which total nominal retail sales and retail sales in real terms both dropped month-to-month. Total retail sales and real retail sales both are declining over three months. Total retail sales at a -0.6% annual rate real retail sales-3.2% annual rate. Real retail sales are decelerating from a 2% growth rate over 12 months to a -1.7% annual rate over six months to a - 0.6% annual rate over three months. Real retail sales show more severe deceleration, growing by merely 0.1% over 12-months shrinking at a 3.8% annual rate over six-months and declining at a 3.2% annual rate over three-months.

Other indicators weaken Over three months housing starts show a sharp contraction, falling at a 60.6% annual rate, a clear ongoing deceleration from a -5.2% drop over 12-months. However other metrics show slightly more upbeat results: employment, for example, yields job growth still at 1.2% at an annual rate over three-months although it slowed from a 1.4% year-over-year gain. The all-encompassing leading economic index shows an actual step up to a pace of 2.9% over 3 months from 2.6% over 6-months and 1.9% over 12-months. Manufacturing and mining output also show gains and a sharp acceleration from their year ago pace; for manufacturing output fell 1.4% year-over-year then rose at a 12.1% annual rate over the three-months ended in September; mining and oil production speeded up from a 4.7 percent 12-month gain to an 8.1% annual rate over three-months. The manufacturing and mining statistics lag by one-month. Another positive sign for the economy is unemployment as the number of unemployed declines at a 0.7% annual rate over three months even though it rises by 5.5% over 12 months.

Ranking metrics We can also vet these various sector results by looking at the growth rates year over year and comparing that pace to what has happened historically back to 2014. These individual category ranking statistics provide better relative comparisons across components. On that basis, the weak sector is retailing with real retail sales having 11.3 percentile standing and overall nominal retail sales having a 22.5 percentile standing. The next lowest year-over-year ranking is from manufacturing at a 22.7 percentile standing, that compares to a 26.1 percentile standing for housing starts. The performance of employment fares relatively better at a 38.7 percentile standing, but that's still below the 50% mark, putting job growth below its median for the period. The number unemployed, however, has a 67.6 percentile standing which is above its median and, of course, not a good result because here we would prefer to see leaner numbers on unemployment changes. The year-over-year growth rate for unemployment is solid, in the top one-third of all of the growth rates of the employed that we've seen since January of 2014. For unemployment, at least the sequential growth rates show that the process of unemployment creation is not accelerating. On the positive side the leading economic index has a 78.9 percentile standing which is quite strong and the mining and oil production have a 61.7 percentile standing which is above their median for the period.

Further context? And, when we consider the ranking of these growth rates, we can also look at the progression of growth in the table, such as the mention I made above for unemployment. For example, housing starts have a weak year-over-year standing but they have a much weaker growth rate over three months Compared to 12-months…on the other hand, manufacturing has a weak year-over-year standing but over three months manufacturing output has stepped up growth considerably. No one statistic can create a profile of these industries which live in the real world and have multiple dimensions and where the trends may be dynamic, in flux, and hard to singularly characterize.

Got inflation? As of October, Canadian inflation had picked up to some extent, inflation in Canada had dipped below the 2% mark from April through August of 2025. In September and October, the year-over-year growth of headline inflation was in the 2.3 to 2.2% region. The CPIx which didn't get quite that low, that recently got down to 1.5% and 1.6% in late 2024 and was as low as 2.2% and 2.5% from March to May of 2025 has moved up. September and October price growth rate is up to the 2.8 to 2.9% pace with the core rate running in the neighborhood of 2.6% toward the end of the year after reaching a low just below 2% in November of last year.

Nothing dramatic but a tilt to more of what Canada wants less of Oh no there's nothing dramatic going on in Canada, the economy appears to be weakening to some extent, the retail sales numbers show the largest deceleration. Of course, Canada and the US continue to have a spat over tariffs, and their two leaders still appear to be somewhat antagonistic about how that process is unfolding. Some Canadian stores have even taken the action of removing form the shelves some goods from the US, particularly US alcoholic products. The step up of inflation is something to watch and does not pair well with the weakening in economic activity.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief