Introducing

Robert Brusca

Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media. Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.

Publications by Robert Brusca

Global| Mar 03 2026
Inflation in Europe Picks Up – Ahead of Hostilities
Inflation in the European Monetary Union picked up in February, ahead of the beginning of new hostilities in the Middle East. The increase in the harmonized index of consumer prices moved up to 0.3% in February from 0.1% to January. Progression on the annual rate of price increase moved up to 1.9% over 12 months, to a 2.1% annual rate over six months, and to a 2.4% annual rate over three months.

This is a modest acceleration and not something to get particularly excited about, except that with new hostilities in the Middle East, oil prices have begun to rise significantly, and there will be apprehension about how much more there is to come. However, the initial oil price reaction was muted, and the follow-up price reaction has also been relatively muted so these will translate into a nontrivial impact on inflation and in the harmonized index for consumer prices in the monetary union, as well as in the key prices watched by central banks globally.

Big Four Economies The Big Four economies in the monetary union produced scattered results in February. Germany produced no increase in its February HICP. The HICP for France jumped by 0.4% month-to-month. Spain showed an increase of 0.2%; Italy reported an outsized increase of 0.7% in February. Still, the January and February data for this group of countries show prices mostly very well behaved. If we simply multiply these 12 increases (four countries over three months) together we get prices rising at a 2.2% annual rate across all the countries over the three months. That is close to target.

Annual and Sequential Big Four Inflation Inflation for the Big Four economies ranges from a top pace of 2.4% in Spain to the lowest pace of 1.1% in France with Italy's 1.6% and Germany's on-target 2% making up middle cases. Even the biggest price increase from Spain at 2.4% is not particularly frightening. Inside of 12 months looking at the six- and 3-month trends, Germany's trends move up to 2.6% over six months and then down to 1.2%. France's 6-month inflation remains at 1.1% over six months but then moves up to a 1.9% annual rate over three months. Italy's 12-month pace of 1.6% holds in place over six months, but then the 3-month inflation rate jumps to a 4.1% annual rate. For Spain, the 2.4% 12 month rate rises to a 3% annual rate over six months and then falls sharply to a 1.6% annual rate over three months.

Headline vs. Core Inflation Headline inflation rates, of course, are mercurial because of the impact of oil prices on them. Two early reporters gave us core inflation or ex-energy inflation rates. In the case of Spain, core inflation is stuck at 2.7% on all horizons. Germany's index excluding energy is at 2.4% over 12 months, but then Germany’s six-month pace falls to 2.2%, and its three-month pace falls again to 1.7%. In the case of Germany, 12-month ex-energy inflation is mildly acceptable, but progressing to the three-month horizon, the inflation rate drops back well into place. For Spain, the 2.7% 12-month inflation rate persists across all horizons and is unacceptably high.

Longer Trends Inflation is generally behaving and riding downtrends in the monetary union, with 12- month inflation generally lower than 12-month inflation was a year ago. That is true for all the major metrics in the table except two. The first exception is France when the 12-month inflation rate is 1.1% compared to 0.9% over 12 months a year ago (still, obviously very well behaved). In the case of Spain, core inflation moves up to 2.7% over 12 months after being at 2.2% just a year ago.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Global| Mar 02 2026
S&P Manufacturing PMIs Show Improvement
The S&P manufacturing PMI readings for February 2026 continued to show improvement, particularly on a sequential basis.

The chart shows a clear upward tendency for the United States, Japan, and the European Monetary Union where the manufacturing PMIs have been on an increasing track for some time. Japan just surpassed the U.S. this month where the manufacturing PMI reading surged above 50. The U.S. has been steady at that level for a number of months; Japan has just moved up while the euro area reading is starting to show some upward trend.

The table takes the underlying diffusion levels reported by these 18 early reporters and shuffles them into six different cohorts to summarize their performance over different periods.

In February, we see twice as many reporters in the cohort between 55 and 60 as we saw in January; that proportion moved up to 11.1% from 5.6%. The proportion in the 50 to 55 diffusion category (mild improvement) was unchanged at 55.6%; the proportion showing mild below median performance declined to 33.3% in February from 38.9% in January. The other cohorts showed no membership.

If we look at the data grouped into sequential categories of three-months, six-months, and 12-months, we see the neutral to mildly positive category of 50% to 55% moving from 28.2% of total membership over 12 months to 39.8% of membership over 6 months to 55.6% membership over 3 months. This is a clear improvement in performance over this timeline for the category indicating moderate expansion. The stronger expansion category of 55 to 60 shows a membership of 5.6% for all three-time horizons. The category showing weak declines in the 40 to 50 range for diffusion declined steadily from 66.2% over 12 months to 54.6% over 6 months to only 38.9% over 3 months. Over the last three months, fewer than 40% of the reporters were showing mild declines, 55% of the reporters were showing unchanged-to-moderate increases, while relatively larger increases have been posted by 5.6% of the reporters.

Looking back to the right of the table, we can compare the recent 12-month figures to the previous 12-months and to the 12-months before that to get a sense of the smoothed trend. There what we see is the 50 to 55 category three years ago was at 28.2% of the reporting membership; it moved up to 38% of the membership over just a year ago whereas over the past year that membership had slipped to 28% in an environment where tariffs were imposed. Although, as we see from the sequential data, it has over the shorter periods of six months and three months been seeing an increase in membership in that category.

Over the earlier years, there was also stronger membership in the stronger growth category of 55 to 60 percentile. Three years ago, it registered 8.3%, then fell to 6.4% and now sits at 5.6% over the recent 12 months. Over the recent shorter periods of three months and six months, there has yet to be an improvement in that category. As for the weaker category the cohort from 40 to 50%, we see 62% of the membership in that category three years ago, and two years ago that had fallen back to 55.6%, but then over the past year it had moved up to average 66% of the membership: fully 2/3 of the reporting membership over the last year has been in the 40 to 50 the diffusion category though that membership proportion has been falling over the last six and three months.

The grouped statistics show that there is general progress in place and in line with what we see reported in the chart. In addition, we track the number of reporters That are improving period to period. From 12 months to six months to three months, we see that percentage of reporters showing higher diffusion readings steadily improving from 50% to 61.1% to 77.8%. We also track the number of reporters with diffusion below 50 (that is those that are showing contraction) and that number hasn't changed very much; it's at 13 over 12 months and over 6 months while falling only to 12 over 3 months.

However, if we step away from averaging and we look at the raw scores for the last three months, we see the number of countries reporting output that's contracting at 8 in December, at 7 in January and at 6 in February, a clearer sense of progress. Meanwhile, on the monthly timeline, there's also a sense of improvement - not in a monotonic sense – but there is a hint of better general tendency for the percent of reporters that are showing the tendency for higher diffusion to be reported to rise.

The diffusion statistics are up to date, and they basically describe the proportion of the reporters that are seeing activity improve or decline in the reporting area. Diffusion data don’t tell us how strong that improvement is, just whether it's present. Diffusion data tend to be sensitive. They tend to quickly be able to identify changes in trends and right now we're seeing an uptick, an improvement, in the levels of diffusion being reported in this 18-country sample for manufacturing. The results are not decisive, but they are encouraging.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Europe| Feb 27 2026
Weak GDP Growth in Europe and Selected Countries Carries On
More countries have reported new results or firmed up their GDP results for 2025Q4. In the EMU, GDP grows by 1.3% year over year in the fourth quarter. The large EMU economies (Big Four) grow by 1% on that horizon, while the rest of the community grows at twice that pace, at 2.1%. U.S. growth on that timeline is 2.2%; Japan’s is 0.2%; and the United Kingdom grows by 0.9%. They are all weak compared to past standards. None of them rank at or above their respective 50th percentile standings on growth rates dating back to 1997.

In Europe, EMU nonmember Denmark’s growth at 3% has an over 50th percentile ranking, at 78.3 percentile mark. Ireland’s growth has a 60.9 percentile standing, while Italy and Portugal have growth rates near their respective 55th percentiles—above their respective medians but not by a lot.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Europe| Feb 26 2026
EMU Indexes Back Off But Hold Uptrend
EU Commission indexes that assess economic performance for the countries in Europe and in the European Monetary Union slipped in February to 98.3 from 99.3 in January; however, the February reading is still relatively strong by recent standards and leaves the index largely in an uptrend.

The February readings saw the industrial sector unchanged, a small upward move in consumer confidence, and a one-point backtracking in construction, as retailing improved by a point. The services sector index stepped back by two points, putting it back at its December level.

Ranking standings for economic groups The key ranking of the sectors in February show only two of the sectors with readings above their medians (i.e., above a ranking of 50%). Those sectors are retailing with a queue standing in its 60.4 percentile and construction with its queue standing in its 79.3 percentile. Consumer confidence continues to be the weakest with a 27.8 percentile ranking, services check in with a 33.4 percentile ranking, and the industrial sector has moved up to a 43.6 percentile ranking. However, the overall monetary union ranking is only in its 41st percentile, substantially below its historic median which resides at a standing at the 50-percentile mark.

Country level performance Beyond the sectors, there are 18 of the 20 monetary union countries that provide early readings to this survey. Eleven countries showed weakened performance in February compared to January. In January, seven countries had weakened relative to December. In December, seven countries had weakened relative to November. However, in December, four of the countries that weakened were the four largest economies in the monetary union. In January, none of the largest four economies weakened month-to-month. Now, in February, we have three of the four largest economies weakening month-to-month, with the other one, Spain, posting an unchanged reading. The large countries in the monetary union have begun to have a little more difficulty over these last three months.

Standings by country Percentile-standing data showed that, of the 18 countries in the table, only 8 have readings that place them above their historic medians on data back to the mid-1980s. The large countries have split performance, with Italy reporting a 59.8 percentile standing and Spain reporting a 72.4 percentile spending, while the two largest monetary union economies, Germany and France, post readings in the 23rd percentile for Germany and the 44th percentile for France. The ranking for the monetary union as a whole is at its 41st percentile. That compares to an unweighted average ranking in the 44th percentile for all the countries when their individual rankings pooled and averaged. The two ratings are close together.

Apart from the Big Four Among the rest of the monetary union members, countries with readings above the 50th percentile are Malta, Greece, Lithuania, Latvia, the Netherlands, and Cyprus. Four countries vie for having the weakest reading in the table, with readings in their 20th percentile region. That list includes Big Four member Germany with the 23.5 percentile standing, Slovakia with a 23.8 percentile standing, Belgium with a 23.1 percentile standing, and Austria with a 22.1 percentile standing. There is considerable heterogeneity among the rankings of the monetary union member countries across all size classes. In addition, as we saw above, looking at the sectors, the sector rankings varied from a low of 27th percentile standing for consumer confidence to a high of 79th percentile standing for construction.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Germany| Feb 25 2026
German Confidence: GfK Consumer Climate Erodes
Climate eased in March after improving in February. There still is a net improvement compared to January, but we must turn the calendar back to April 2024 to find a climate reading lower than the current level in March. In sum, there is no sense of ongoing improvement for climate in this report. The economic expectations and income expectations readings, which lag by one month, do show some improvement on a longer timeline. But the propensity-to-buy index is still quite weak.

Climate at -24.7 in March has an 8.2 percentile standing on data back to 2002. The economic expectations, reading, fell back to 4.3 in February from 6.6 in January to set a 49-percentile standing. Income expectations rose to 6.3 in February from 5.1 in January. Income expectations have a 42.4 percentile standing. The propensity to buy weakened sharply to -9.3 in February from -4 in January. Its percentile standing is at a 30.7 percentile level, a bottom one-third standing.

The table also presents consumer confidence readings for three other European economies. Among them, Italy has the strongest ranking at a 74-percentiel standing. The Italian reading is up-to-date through January and has been showing improvement. The United Kingdom and France have similar standings. The U.K. standing is at its 43.7 percentile mark, below its median on this timeline. The U.K. reading is up-to-date through January and has been showing a tendency to improve. France has a rank standing at a 39.7 percentile; it is up-to-date through February. The index has been very slowly improving.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
France| Feb 24 2026
French Manufacturing and Services Surveys: Two Sectors, Two Different Trends, and Lingering Weakness
Neither the service sector nor the manufacturing survey value is particularly strong. The services climate headline has a 25-percentile standing; it has been higher about 75% of the time. That is not a good result. For manufacturing and industry, the standing is just short of the 50% mark which leaves it quite close to its historic median. That is not strong, but it is not weak either; it’s a modest middle ground. But February’s reading gave up ground, falling to 102.1 from 105.4 in January, back essentially to its December 2025 level. Even so, the February value has not been exceeded persistently until we go back to August 2022—three and one-half years ago.

The rebound in manufacturing is nascent; we can question its sustainability. And it is also only a modest step up after February’s erosion. Orders and demand flared higher in January and backed down in February. Orders and demand have a 50-percentile standing, with foreign orders much stronger at a 75-percentile standing. While production has a sub-median, 42-percentile standing, responses, when aggregated, show an ‘own-personal’ response standing at 62.2%. Maybe there is more granular, industry-level confidence that is being restrained by macroeconomic pessimism. This two-tier response is recreated compatibly for prices where firms see high own price trends stronger than their whole-economy trend. The own-price trends are elevated with a ranking over their 60th percentile while the macro price expectation is at a 48-percentiel standing. Production expectations are a classical representation of this month’s survey, falling back this month after some improvement last month and sporting a 49.1 percentile standing – a near median result. The manufacturing survey does not suggest any trouble; it exhibits near normal behavior, with orders at a midstream level/ranking.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Germany| Feb 23 2026
German IFO: Business Confidence Claws Its Way Out of a Hole
Germany's IFO index shows improvement in February compared to January. The climate index improves, the current conditions index improves, and expectations improve. All three all-sector headlines improve in February compared to January. However, all three metrics continue to register net negative readings, indicating that the sectors are showing more contraction than expansion, but less contraction than it had been the case previously. We ranked these headlines on data back to 1993; the climate index has a 22.5 percentile standing, expectations have a 22.4 standing, and current conditions have a 16.9 percentile standing. All three of the headline metrics have standings in the lower quartile of their queue of values back to the early 1990s. This is clearly not a stellar report but a report from an economy that is struggling. Even though it's widely reported that the climate index is currently on a six-month high; it may be on a six-month high, but it's not really much different than it was six months ago and only up by 1.1% from its lowest mark in the intervening five months—so not impressive. This is a grueling, crawling, dig-out from difficult circumstances. The COVID pandemic was a sucker punch to the global economy, and it was followed by the Russian invasion of Ukraine that hit Europe especially hard because of the proximity.

Since then, other geopolitical tensions have risen. Europe's relationship with the United States has deteriorated, in part because Europe—Germany in particular—was reluctant to detach itself from its mercantile relationships with Russia and was also reluctant to increase its financial participation in NATO. The U.S. was carrying the burden of the protective umbrella for Europe at a time when Europe didn't really think it needed a protective umbrella and so it was unwilling to pay for anything more substantial. When the rainy day came and when the Russian invasion of Ukraine occurred, Europe was completely unprepared and the U.S. was its protector. While Germany and other European countries quickly made it clear that they were fully on board with NATO defense, the U.S. was much less enthusiastic about carrying the burden after Europe had put its financial probity ahead of its defense spending obligations. Now Europe does not see the U.S. and its perceived greater needs for security because of improved navigation from the Arctic Circle to the North Atlantic.

These troubles continue to dog the relationship between the United States and Europe, and the European Community. And Europe’s own economic struggles continue. In the climate readings, all four of five sectors improve from January to February. Current conditions improve in three of the five sectors, with retailing and wholesaling slipping month-to-month. Expectations do improve overall, but three of five sectors take a step back in February, with expectations improving sharply for services, and substantively for wholesaling. Still manufacturing, construction, and retailing expectations stepped back.

Across the three broad areas of assessment across five sectors in each, there are only two (two of fifteen) sector metrics that rank above their 50th percentile (above their respective medians) when ranked against readings back to 1993. Both of those elevated rankings are for construction, one for Climate, and the other for current conditions, but construction expectations, at a 44.5 percentile standing, are not far below their median.

Still, the lowest environmental standings are for services, except under expectations where the services reading is second-weakest to retailing. The graphic shows some tendency for an upturn in climate and current conditions, but they are countered by an expectations path that has topped out and has been gradually leaning lower—and doing that with a current ranking in only its 22.5 percentile. So, while there is some life in the IFO survey this month, we are still looking at a patient in intensive care, not one ready to join Olympic competition—at least not yet.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Global| Feb 20 2026
S&P PMIs Are Mostly Stronger in February
PMI data for February, issued by S&P on a flash basis, show relatively broad improvement PMI performance in February, with the exception of Australia, India, and the United States. The European Monetary Union shows improvement in its composite index as well as for manufacturing and services. This pushed to higher ratings, supported by Germany and France with the exception that French manufacturing took a step back in February. In the United Kingdom, the composite and manufacturing indexes moved ahead but services weakened. In Japan, the composite, manufacturing and services all improved on a month-to-month basis. However, Australia saw a step back in all three sectors after several months of continued strengthening. India also saw a step back in the composite and services after a recent string of improvements being reported. The United States shows uneven conditions, with a weakening across the board month-to-month in February vs. an across-the-board rebound in January, and then across-the-board weakening in December. This leaves the U.S. in a weakening and volatile situation

An unweighted average of the monthly composite, manufacturing, and services indexes shows a one-tick step back for the composite, a small step up for manufacturing, and a small step back in services for February compared to January. January had made across the board improvements relative to December.

Sequential comparisons where data are lagged by one month and the calculations are made only off of hard data (not off of flash or preliminary data) show mixed economic conditions and unclear trends. EMU shows sequential strengthening in the composite as do France and Japan; Japan also shows persistent strengthening in manufacturing, as the yen has been dropping. And while there is a lot of weakening sequentially, there is no persistent weakening reported for 12-months to 6-months to 3-months.

Over three months, there's a split in what is reported with 12 of the 24 sectors weakening compared to six months ago and 12 of them strengthening. Over six months, only six of the sectors are weakening; the remainder strengthening over 12 months; eight of the sectors are weakening over 12 months compared to a year ago, with the remainder strengthening. While it's not a clear path to deterioration, there is a clear tendency to deterioration over three months compared to six months. However, an unweighted comparison of the three sectors shows that composite manufacturing and services still demonstrate a bit of muddy water with the composites weakening over three months only by a tick to 52.9 compared to 53 while manufacturing improves slightly and services weakens slightly compared to six months. Over six months, there's only a slight step back from the statistics reported over 12 months.

Not a lot of shifting, but some good news and bad news The bottom line is there's not a whole lot of change going on according to the PMI data. On a breadth basis, there has been some improvement, but the magnitudes involved seem to wash out some of that improvement, neutralizing when expressing as average comparisons. However, one place where there does appear to be evidence of more solid performance is in the queue percentile standings. Among these 8 reporters involving 24 sectors, only four sectors report current standings below their median on data back to January 2022. One of those countries is India, with a weaker composite and services sector; the other is the United States, with a weaker composite and services sector. The U.S. composite has a queue percentile standing at its 42nd percentile, below its neutral position of 50%. The U.S. services sector is even weaker with a 36-percentile standing, close to the lower third of all the U.S. PMI values that have shown for services since 2022 on a monthly basis.

U.S. economy has been cranking out some reasonably strong economic numbers across the board including consumer spending and GDP figures, allowing for a disappointing fourth quarter that is being attributed to the government shutdown. However, what's been lacking on the U.S. side has been strong job market performance and, of course, because of mortgage rates being high, there has been a weak construction sector in the U.S. economy. Still, the queue standing across the board for other countries should be reassuring. The average composite ranking for this group of countries is in the 70th percentile, with manufacturing in the 75th percentile and services in their 61st percentile. These are relatively firm readings and should be reassuring. At the same time, central banks have made progress on inflation and tightening cycles have not been engaged or easing cycles are being extended for all central banks except for the Bank of Japan, which has been experiencing growth and inflation in different measures from the rest of the G7 countries. On balance, however, global growth appears to be moving forward and now we'll have to see what happens with the U.S. Supreme Court having overthrown the imposition of tariffs that the Trump administration put in place without Congressional backing. We could see some considerable shifting in the months ahead.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Belgium| Feb 19 2026
Belgian Consumer Confidence Clings to a Positive Reading
Belgian consumer confidence slipped in February. But it has made a long climb back to positive territory and that reading is holding on at +1 in February, down from +4 in January.

Belgian consumer confidence has been slowing progressing from a reading of -4 twelve-months ago to -2 six-months ago and to +2 just three-months ago. This progression shows a trend of improvement under way for the Belgian consumer.

Also, importantly, the queue reading of the consumer index in February is at a standing of 85.3, a top 15-percentile reading on data since 1991.

The economic situation is not as robust. It has improved for the next 12 months to -25 from a reading of -29 in January. There is a slight weakening in readings from 12-months to 6-months to 3-months, and the current February reading of -25 diffusion has a 15-percentile standing on data back to 1991. This concept carries a larger negative value over the next 12 months than under the last 12 months. However, that reading nonetheless has a stronger standing at its 24.9 percentile than the outlook for the 12 months ahead. The economic situation is clearly suppressed compared to the confidence reading.

Prices show a slight weakening for the next 12 months compared to the January reading. However, the 12-month to 6-month to 3-month readings show a move up to stronger price levels. The ranking of the February price reading is a top 16-percentile reading; inflation in Belgium is still on the hot side.

However, prospects for unemployment have shifted sharply to show a much lower expectation of unemployment; unemployment expectations increased from -20 in January to a diffusion reading of -11 in February, with a ranking in its lower two percentile.

The environment for making a major household purchase over the next 12 months has eroded over the past few months, although it shows a trend toward improvement from 12-months to 6-months to 3-months. Still, the February reading has a 29.7 percentile standing, well below its historical median (represented by a 50 percentile standing).

The ‘favorable to spend at present’ index weakened quite sharply in February and has been slipping from 12-months to 6-months to 3-months. It registered in February a standing in only its 10th percentile, extremely weak. The consumer is not leading Belgium into recovery on the back of spending.

The financial situation expected over the next 12 months has been relatively static month-to-month as well as across the last 12 months. The ranking for expected conditions is weak at a 34th percentile reading. But the current financial situation, while stepping back on the month, has an 82.7 percentile standing. The financial situation reading appears to be in some flux, but the actual current readings have been firm in relatively strong territory for some time.

Household savings for the next 12 months backed down in February but had been strengthening over the past year. The February reading is quite high, a top 9-percentile reading. The favorability to save has not changed much over the past year but has eroded slightly in February. The February current assessment for savings is at a 62.2 percentile reading, much weaker than its 12-month outlook reading.

The Belgian consumer is experiencing some crosscurrents. Consumer readings are underpinned by low expectations for unemployment and by a solid current situation appraisal. However, the economic situation remains weak and is not trending higher and inflation readings are still uncomfortably high.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
United Kingdom| Feb 18 2026
U.K. Inflation Waffles and Percolates
Inflation in the United Kingdom has irregularly downshifted over the past two months. In January, consumer price inflation remained steady at 2.8% over three months, the same pace as over six months. Core inflation ticked up to 3.3% over three months from 3.1% over six months but settled below the 12-month pace of 3.4%. Yet another measure, the HICP, comparable to the inflation rates reported by ECB numbers, logs 2.5% over three months, a slight uptick from six-month pace but less than the 12-month pace of 3%.

Diffusion The diffusion statistics that measure the breadth of acceleration of inflation across categories month-to-month came in at only 16.7% in January, down from 66.7% in December and compared to 33.3% in November. Diffusion readings below 50% indicate more deceleration than acceleration. So, inflation has been under control, with recent results showing more deceleration for inflation monthly than to accelerate. December was an exception. Over the 3 , 6 , and 12 month periods, inflation shows some acceleration tendency over 3 months, with diffusion at 58.3%; but that compares to 6-month diffusion at 16.7% and 12-month diffusion at 25%. Once again, the broad stroke for inflation, trending from 12 months to 6 months to 3 months, is showing more categories decelerating than accelerating.

Inflation rate ranking The final right-hand column ranks inflation rates on data back to 2000 based on their year-over-year performance. The current HICP, at 3%, has a 73.8 percentile standing among inflation rates back to 2000, marking it near the upper 25 percentile of the collection of results. The CPIH has a 79.6 percentile standing, putting it closer to the top 20% of observations over that same span. Core inflation at 3.4% has an 83.7 percentile standing, putting it in nearly the top 15% of results on data back to 2000.

Convergence around 2.8% The chart, supplemented by diffusion data, clearly shows that there is some inflation deceleration in progress; however, the level of year-over-year inflation still shows inflation among the upper ranges of what it's been over the last 25 years.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Europe| Feb 17 2026
IP in EMU Weakens in December; Sector Trends Show Slow or Erratic Improvements
Industrial output in the European monetary union fell by 1.4% in December. Manufacturing output fell by 1.3%. Output of consumer goods fell by 0.3%, output of intermediate goods fell by 0.1%, and output of capital goods fell by 1.9% in December. The subsector, consumer durables, showed an increase in output of 0.2% in December. Headline and manufacturing output in December reversed the increases seen in October and November. However, consumer goods, consumer nondurables, and intermediate goods saw two consecutive months of output declines for November and December.

Turning to sequential trends, overall industrial output rises by 1.1% over 12 months, falls at a 0.8% annual rate over six months, and then falls at a 1.2% annual rate over three months showing a tendency for deceleration. Manufacturing shows the same pattern of eroding growth rates for the one-year and shorter horizons.

Sector stories However, for consumer goods, manufacturing output is accelerating steadily from a growth rate of 2% over 12 months, to a 7% pace over six months, and to a 16.6% annual rate over three months; the inclusion of ‘semi-durables’ in this category total makes it stronger than the two detailed subcategories of durable and nondurable goods. Consumer durables output transitions from falling 2.3% over 12 months to growing at a 3% pace over three months. Consumer nondurables output shows persistent declines, with slightly more intense over shorter periods, echoing the deceleration phenomenon. Intermediate goods and capital goods do not show clear sequential trends, but both categories show increases in output over all three horizons.

Cross currents These cross currents among sectors make it hard to characterize what's happening with output trends in the European Monetary Union. The country detail shows a good deal of turbulence, with a number of countries showing decelerating output trends and others showing accelerating output trends. It's fair to say that manufacturing in the EMU continues in the grip of cross currents. While the short-term data in the table that look at growth rates from 12-months to 6-months to 3-months show more weakening than strengthening, the trends in the graph across recent 12-month growth rates seem to show a little more solidifying and expanding behavior – albeit with confusing volatility as well.

Quarter-to-date (concluded Q4) In the quarter to date, all of the sectors and subsectors show output rising except for the aggregate for manufacturing that is flat, and consumer nondurables that show a decline at 6.7% at an annual rate. In the quarter to date, overall output is growing at a 1.4% annual rate, while consumer goods output is expanding at a 13.8% annual rate, immediate goods output is expanding at 1.5% annual rate, and capital goods output is expanding at a 3.7% annual rate. Those sector numbers look exceptionally healthy.

Ranking the trends The far-right hand column analyzes the 12-month growth rates comparing them to historic growth rates since 2006. Most of the growth rate rankings over this span are moderate, with standings above their respective 50th percentiles, placing them above their historic medians. However, consumer durable goods and nondurable goods are exceptions, with rankings in their 31st percentile and 10th percentile, respectively. Consumer nondurables output is particularly weak in comparison with historical trends. On the other hand, intermediate goods and capital goods output have rankings in their 60th percentile, and for all consumer goods output, the ranking is near its 60th percentile. Looking only at manufacturing, the ranking slips to its 52.9 percentile; for the headline series which excludes construction, the ranking is at its 53.8 percentile.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
United Kingdom| Feb 12 2026
U.K. Second Half GDP Slows to a Crawl
U.K. GDP slowed to a crawl at the end of the year, with growth at a 0.2% (annualized) rate logged in both the third and fourth quarters as 2025 drew to a close. The year had started with a strong 2.7% growth rate in Q1, which slipped to a 0.8% pace in the second quarter and decelerated to negligible growth at the end of the year.

These quarterly growth rates correspond to higher but obviously declining year over year growth rates. Because the quarterly growth rates diminished as the year progressed, year over year growth to start 2025 was at 1.8%; growth slipped to 1.4% in the second quarter and then to 1.2% in the third quarter. By the end of the year, growth had slipped to 1%.

The quarterly growth rates in the fourth quarter show public spending picked up to a 1.7% annual rate following 1% in the third quarter and erratic behavior in the first two quarters. Capital formation has remained relatively strong but has also oscillated, with first quarter growth at a blowout annual rate of 14.3%, falling to a contraction of 3.1% in Q2, rising back to 4.4% in Q3, and then declining at a 0.5% annual rate in Q4. So the year-over-year growth rates for capital formation during the course of the year only slipped from 4% in the first quarter to 3.6% in the fourth quarter, holding up fairly solidly and indicating strong rates of expansion for capital spending.

Housing, which was firm and strong in Q1 and Q2, slipped to a 0.8% annual rate of growth in the third quarter, and then housing investment fell at a 9.1% annualized rate in the fourth quarter. Year over year trends for housing show mostly low to moderate spending growth for residential investment.

U.K. exports have been floundering quarter-to-quarter, alternating between expanding and contracting; this corresponds to year over year growth rates that steadily diminish. In the first quarter of 2025, exports grew 3.5% year-over-year; that slipped to a 2% growth rate in Q2, then to a 1.5% growth rate in the third quarter. In the fourth quarter, U.K. exports are falling at a 0.5% annual rate of growth.

The export pattern contrasts with U.K. imports. They have mostly continued to grow, posting positive growth rates in three of the four quarters, starting the year with 5% quarterly growth and ending the fourth quarter with a 3.3% annual growth rate. Import growth rates have slipped, but not as much as other growth rates in GDP. For example, first quarter import growth was extremely strong at 7.6%; that year over year growth rate slips to 2.1% in Q2, then rises back to 5.3% in Q3, and finishes the year at 2.3%. There is slippage, but still significant growth, and the year began on a really high note.

Domestic demand has been fluctuating. In both quarterly and annual terms, there is unevenness. Quarterly growth rates range from 3.1% at an annual rate in Q1, to a 0.6% and 0.7% annual rate in the middle two quarters of the year; domestic demand ends the fourth quarter with a quarterly growth rate of 2.1% annualized. This causes year-over-year growth to be 2.9% in the first quarter; that falls to 1.2% in the second quarter, rebounds to 2.1% in the third quarter, and ends the year at 1.6% year-over-year.

Domestic demand has consistently been stronger than private consumption and it has been supported by both public consumption and by capital formation. Private consumption in 2025 has been erratic, logging 1.2% quarterly growth, annualized, in the first quarter; growth dropped to 0.2% in Q2, rising back to 1.7% in Q3, and then ending the year at a 0.6% rate of expansion quarter-over-quarter. The year-over-year data showed private consumption slipping but not dramatically, at a pace of 1.1% in the first quarter, up to 1.2% in the second quarter and then logging 0.9% in both the third and fourth quarters of 2025 as domestic demand ended the year stronger.

All of the U.K. growth rates are consistently and substantially below their five year growth rates. The economy continues to have a problem with inflation. Some recent inflation signals, however, suggest that there may be deceleration and progress, but the Bank of England hasn’t been convinced yet, even though Monetary Policy Committee members continue to speak favorably about the prospects for rate reductions ahead. The U.K. also has a corseted fiscal situation as there’s not much flexibility to spend more given its relatively bloated budget. The economy is waffling. The current administration has had its share of political issues, having recently had to eject several members from leadership positions in government. The outlook for growth is still touch and go. The outlook for inflation holds slightly more promise for deescalation. But overall, there is a lot of uncertainty over events and the growth path for the U.K. economy.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief