Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics

Introducing

Robert Brusca

Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media.   Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.

Publications by Robert Brusca

  • France’s trade deficit widened in February as imports outpaced exports. Import growth continues to look more vibrant than export growth as the trends are accelerating more uniformly across trade categories. Over the recent three [...]

  • French industrial output was up especially strong rising by 1.1% and led by a 1.2% increase in the output of consumer goods. EU IP trends have been soft recently. Even Germany where conditions have been rather solid has showed some [...]

  • Japan’s economy watcher’s survey shows the ongoing downshift in Japan’s economy from a local peak reached back in March of 2006. Since then, the economy has showed less strength but in the recent three months or so the economy [...]

  • Japan’s economy watcher’s survey shows the ongoing downshift in Japan’s economy from a local peak reached back in March of 2006. Since then, the economy has showed less strength but in the recent three months or so the economy [...]

  • The OECD trend restored leading indicators show a clear deceleration across major areas and countries. Despite this ongoing slowdown Central banks across the region generally are fighting inflation and seem to see it as a still- [...]


  • Each month the factory order report is a re-issue of durable goods from the week before with (usually) minor revisions plus a new look at nondurable goods shipments and inventories. This month the durable goods order gain was trimmed from a small rise of 2.5% to an even tinier rise of 1.7% for February following a plunge in January. The new data for February are for nondurable goods. Orders there rose by a meager 0.2% in the month. Over three months they are weak with shipments dropping by 1%. But the good news is that progress on inventory reduction is in train as inventories dropped by 4.4% in February. The overall trends for the factory sector cut into three month blocks shows some revival in shipments compared to past trends. And there is a relatively sharp fall off in (still high) unfilled orders. Inventories are undergoing a gradual slowing in their build up. New orders continue to drop and at a slightly accelerated pace.

    Sector detail for nondurables shows a lot of weakness. Beverages are weak as are the Textile Mill and Product sectors. For Textiles inventory reduction is being achieved at a very rapid pace. Apparel has just turned positive and Leather Goods shows considerable strength. Paper Products and Printing are weak with shipments declining. Petroleum & Coal and Plastics & Rubber also are seeing shipment declines. Basic Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals & Medicines have turned sharply positive.

    These are the readings that are new in the day’s report. They are hardly encouraging.

    Factory Orders
    Factory Orders3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments-3.5%-9.4%-5.6%-1.0%6.6%
    New Orders-9.0%-7.8%-4.9%-0.8%7.1%
    Unfilled Orders14.5%23.6%20.3%20.8%17.0%
    Inventories1.0%2.8%5.0%6.4%2.5%
    Nondurable goods3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments-1.0%-11.8%-7.8%-1.3%5.0%
    Inventories-4.4%-3.3%0.2%2.2%4.0%
    Nondurable Goods: Orders and Inventories by Industry
    Food Products3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments1.7%1.2%2.0%0.5%0.9%
    Inventories-0.9%6.3%6.3%4.5%4.3%
    Beverages3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments-20.7%-12.9%-7.4%0.1%7.4%
    Inventories3.0%3.2%1.3%-0.7%4.2%
    Textile Mills3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments-3.6%-2.4%-3.0%-3.1%-12.6%
    Inventories-25.3%-16.2%-8.1%-8.8%-7.9%
    Textile Products3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments-4.1%-8.6%-11.9%-8.5%3.9%
    Inventories-11.6%-9.2%-1.3%-2.6%-0.6%
    Apparel3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments0.8%3.7%-8.6%-1.9%8.0%
    Inventories7.4%-22.6%-12.4%-9.2%-1.1%
    Leather & Allied Products3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments105.8%14.9%16.7%10.1%-2.9%
    Inventories23.4%7.4%15.1%11.9%-9.0%
    Paper Products3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments-2.6%-5.5%-5.3%-1.5%1.1%
    Inventories5.8%2.9%0.4%1.9%-1.9%
    Printing3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments-7.0%0.4%1.1%3.5%-3.1%
    Inventories-15.8%-16.6%-2.0%0.7%-2.1%
    Petroleum&Coal3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments-1.3%-32.7%-23.7%-5.3%17.2%
    Inventories-15.5%-30.4%-19.2%4.5%16.3%
    Basic Chemicals3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments4.7%-10.3%-5.9%0.2%4.0%
    Inventories-0.4%-1.0%1.7%1.9%2.9%
    Pharmaceuticals & Medicine3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments19.6%-6.5%-6.8%6.3%-1.0%
    Inventories-7.4%-1.1%5.5%11.0%-4.6%
    Plastics & Rubber Products3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments-6.6%-12.5%-7.0%-3.7%7.0%
    Inventories6.5%5.0%1.0%0.7%4.6%

  • ISM trends show a weakening trend in the services-mining-construction sector of the economy to add to the lethargy in manufacturing. The past two months show that the index has dropped to a much lower profile than before. This is the weakest activity recorded since early 2003. Employment trend has been ground into a lower profile as well. The results are disconcerting although it may be that ongoing construction problems are weighing on the index and services are not as weak as the index suggests.

    An analysis of the position of the various ISM components in their respective ranges shows that weakness characterizes this sector. Both activity and orders are below their range midpoints and below their period average values. Order backlogs continue to appear strong as an offset, as we have seen in durable goods order report. Unlike the ISM manufacturing we see that export and import services are weak. For manufacturing these two series were quite firm. Price readings rose in the month and remain firm in their historic range. On balance, the nonmanufacturing sector does not appear to be as strong or supportive of the economy as it once was. It raises the question of whether the weakness in manufacturing and construction industries has ground down the once vibrant services sector that is nested within the nonmanufacturing ISM.

    ISM Nonmanufacturing Statistics from January 1998 to Date
      
    ISM-NMFGCurrentStd DevAverageSD %AvgMAXMINRangePercentile% of AVG
    PM Activity52.44.757.58.267.940.527.443.491
    New Orders53.84.757.28.266.941.325.648.894
    Backlogs52.53.751.07.257.040.516.572.7103
    Supplier Deliveries50.02.153.64.060.548.012.516.093
    Inventory Sentiment63.02.763.14.369.055.014.057.1100
    Inventories52.03.250.56.259.043.515.554.8103
    Prices63.38.359.813.980.541.339.256.1106
    Employment50.83.751.77.159.943.916.043.198
    Export Orders48.54.554.88.364.044.519.520.589
    Import Orders50.04.054.77.463.545.518.025.091

  • ISM trends show a weakening trend in the services-mining-construction sector of the economy to add to the lethargy in manufacturing. The past two months show that the index has dropped to a much lower profile than before. This is the weakest activity recorded since early 2003. Employment trend has been ground into a lower profile as well. The results are disconcerting although it may be that ongoing construction problems are weighing on the index and services are not as weak as the index suggests.

    An analysis of the position of the various ISM components in their respective ranges shows that weakness characterizes this sector. Both activity and orders are below their range midpoints and below their period average values. Order backlogs continue to appear strong as an offset, as we have seen in durable goods order report. Unlike the ISM manufacturing we see that export and import services are weak. For manufacturing these two series were quite firm. Price readings rose in the month and remain firm in their historic range. On balance, the nonmanufacturing sector does not appear to be as strong or supportive of the economy as it once was. It raises the question of whether the weakness in manufacturing and construction industries has ground down the once vibrant services sector that is nested within the nonmanufacturing ISM.

    ISM Nonmanufacturing Statistics from January 1998 to Date
      
    ISM-NMFGCurrentStd DevAverageSD %AvgMAXMINRangePercentile% of AVG
    PM Activity52.44.757.58.267.940.527.443.491
    New Orders53.84.757.28.266.941.325.648.894
    Backlogs52.53.751.07.257.040.516.572.7103
    Supplier Deliveries50.02.153.64.060.548.012.516.093
    Inventory Sentiment63.02.763.14.369.055.014.057.1100
    Inventories52.03.250.56.259.043.515.554.8103
    Prices63.38.359.813.980.541.339.256.1106
    Employment50.83.751.77.159.943.916.043.198
    Export Orders48.54.554.88.364.044.519.520.589
    Import Orders50.04.054.77.463.545.518.025.091
    U.S. Factory Orders Continue to Disappoint
    by Robert Brusca April 4, 2007

    Each month the factory order report is a re-issue of durable goods from the week before with (usually) minor revisions plus a new look at nondurable goods shipments and inventories. This month the durable goods order gain was trimmed from a small rise of 2.5% to an even tinier rise of 1.7% for February following a plunge in January. The new data for February are for nondurable goods. Orders there rose by a meager 0.2% in the month. Over three months they are weak with shipments dropping by 1%. But the good news is that progress on inventory reduction is in train as inventories dropped by 4.4% in February. The overall trends for the factory sector cut into three month blocks shows some revival in shipments compared to past trends. And there is a relatively sharp fall off in (still high) unfilled orders. Inventories are undergoing a gradual slowing in their build up. New orders continue to drop and at a slightly accelerated pace.

    Sector detail for nondurables shows a lot of weakness. Beverages are weak as are the Textile Mill and Product sectors. For Textiles inventory reduction is being achieved at a very rapid pace. Apparel has just turned positive and Leather Goods shows considerable strength. Paper Products and Printing are weak with shipments declining. Petroleum & Coal and Plastics & Rubber also are seeing shipment declines. Basic Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals & Medicines have turned sharply positive.

    These are the readings that are new in the day’s report. They are hardly encouraging.

    Factory Orders
    Factory Orders3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments-3.5%-9.4%-5.6%-1.0%6.6%
    New Orders-9.0%-7.8%-4.9%-0.8%7.1%
    Unfilled Orders14.5%23.6%20.3%20.8%17.0%
    Inventories1.0%2.8%5.0%6.4%2.5%
    Nondurable goods3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments-1.0%-11.8%-7.8%-1.3%5.0%
    Inventories-4.4%-3.3%0.2%2.2%4.0%
    Nondurable Goods: Orders and Inventories by Industry
    Food Products3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments1.7%1.2%2.0%0.5%0.9%
    Inventories-0.9%6.3%6.3%4.5%4.3%
    Beverages3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments-20.7%-12.9%-7.4%0.1%7.4%
    Inventories3.0%3.2%1.3%-0.7%4.2%
    Textile Mills3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments-3.6%-2.4%-3.0%-3.1%-12.6%
    Inventories-25.3%-16.2%-8.1%-8.8%-7.9%
    Textile Products3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments-4.1%-8.6%-11.9%-8.5%3.9%
    Inventories-11.6%-9.2%-1.3%-2.6%-0.6%
    Apparel3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments0.8%3.7%-8.6%-1.9%8.0%
    Inventories7.4%-22.6%-12.4%-9.2%-1.1%
    Leather & Allied Products3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments105.8%14.9%16.7%10.1%-2.9%
    Inventories23.4%7.4%15.1%11.9%-9.0%
    Paper Products3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments-2.6%-5.5%-5.3%-1.5%1.1%
    Inventories5.8%2.9%0.4%1.9%-1.9%
    Printing3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments-7.0%0.4%1.1%3.5%-3.1%
    Inventories-15.8%-16.6%-2.0%0.7%-2.1%
    Petroleum&Coal3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments-1.3%-32.7%-23.7%-5.3%17.2%
    Inventories-15.5%-30.4%-19.2%4.5%16.3%
    Basic Chemicals3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments4.7%-10.3%-5.9%0.2%4.0%
    Inventories-0.4%-1.0%1.7%1.9%2.9%
    Pharmaceuticals & Medicine3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments19.6%-6.5%-6.8%6.3%-1.0%
    Inventories-7.4%-1.1%5.5%11.0%-4.6%
    Plastics & Rubber Products3Mo6Mo9Mo12MoYear Ago
    Shipments-6.6%-12.5%-7.0%-3.7%7.0%
    Inventories6.5%5.0%1.0%0.7%4.6%
    India Balance of Payments Sees Dynamic Trade and Investment Flows, with Record Reserve Accumulation in 2006
    by Carol Stone April 4, 2007

    India's balance of payments shows an unusual amount of two-way flow in both current and financial accounts. In Q4 2006 this encompassed a variety of distinctive movements. The trade deficit widened, continuing to confound many observers' preconceptions that India shouldn't have a deficit in this account at all. Petroleum is apparently the main cause, as suggested by the second graph here. It shows merchandise imports less petroleum plotted with merchandise exports, and these two quantities have roughly the same magnitudes.

    The overall current account is much more near balance, as sizable surpluses in services and unilateral transfers offset much of the trade shortfall. In fact, the net on services in Q4, right at $9.0 billion, is nearly twice as much as it was in Q4 of 2005. This is the numerical result of the "outsourcing" of many business service activities by companies elsewhere in the world. Many Indians work abroad and send money home. Private transfers in Q4 were $7.9 billion, up $1.5 billion from the same period a year ago. The balances on services and transfers were both record amounts.

    Capital accounts feature sizable -- unprecedented -- direct investment flows in BOTH directions. Foreign firms acquired Indian companies and Indian companies made acquisitions abroad. Foreign investors also increased their portfolio holdings, as they bought into the Indian stock market. Other capital account transactions, including bank loans and bank deposits and assorted other kinds of lending also showed great fluidity: Indian banks made sizable loans abroad, while nonbank lending to India grew sharply.

    All together, the "overall balance" in Q4 was $7.5 billion, with a commensurate increase in foreign exchange reserves. This is sizable, and such numbers are getting to be common. For 2006 as a whole, the balance totaled $29.4 billion, also a record. Such accumulations of foreign exchange will enable more flows abroad, such as the outward investments recently seen.

    Haver's data on India is contained in the EMERGEPR database.

    INDIA1: Mil.US$Q4 2006Q3 2006Q4 2005200620052004
    Current Account2,3-1,321-2,465-3,549-10,006-7,810+781
    Merchandise Trade2-18,251-14,346-12,400-63,783-46,872-28,036
    Services2+8,995+7,650+4,643+31,428+22,259+13,076
    Transfers2+8,282+5,503+6,631+26,290+23,234+19,793
    Direct Investment in India+8,669+3,414+2,002+16,888+6,663+5,771
    Direct Investment Abroad-6,388-1,146-784-9,029-2,487-2,179
    Portfolio Investment+3,556+2,141+2,748+9,503+12,144+9,037
    Overall Balance3+7,507+2,268-4,672+29,372+14,460+23,601
  • Global| Apr 03 2007

    Euro Area and UK PPI Trends

    · The Euro area 13 PPI rose by 0.3% in February. Excluding energy the rise was 0.3% as well. Trends show that PPI inflation pressures are elevated. And while the PPI is not the main focus of ECB policy, the pressure on prices is widespread across main EU countries. The bank of England has even recently said it was going to look beyond headline inflation as legacy issues might damp that calculation in the coming months. Central banks are becoming more concerned about embedded inflation pressures.
    Euro area and UK PPI Trends

     M/MSAAR
    Euro area 13Feb-07Jan-073-Mo6-MOYr/Yr
    Total (Excl Construction) 0.3%0.2%2.1%0.2%2.9%

    yes">   Excl Energy

    0.3%0.5%3.4%2.7%3.4%
    Capital Goods0.1%0.5%2.9%2.3%2.0%
    Consumer Goods0.2%0.3%2.4%1.2%1.6%
    Intermediate & Capital Goods0.3%0.6%3.9%3.4%4.4%
    Energy0.4%-0.7%-1.8%-7.5%1.0%
    Manufacturing0.4%0.1%2.3%-0.4%2.5%
    Germany0.3%0.0%1.0%0.3%2.8%

    yes">  Excl Energy

    0.3%0.2%2.2%2.4%3.0%
    France0.3%0.1%1.1%-0.7%2.0%

    yes">  Excl Energy

    0.2%0.5%2.2%1.9%2.8%
    Italy0.4%0.0%2.4%0.2%4.0%

    yes">  Excl Energy

    0.3%0.6%4.3%3.0%4.2%
    UK-0.8%-1.4%-6.7%1.4%-1.4%

    yes">  Excl Energy

    0.4%0.5%3.7%3.1%3.4%
    Euro area 13 Harmonized PPI excl Construction.
    The EA 13 countries are Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia and Spain
    6COLSPAN

    Trend across categories and countries do not show a steadily accelerating inflation rate that central banks would clearly abhor. But they do show that pressures that had dissipated have re-emerged in the 3-month inflation rates. Excluding energy, inflation trends across the main countries show the same tendency except in Germany and in France where the pace of PPI ex-energy inflation is staying fairly constant, just above the 2% pace.

    The headline inflation rate is moving steadily lower, but ex-energy inflation is considerably more stubborn around 3.5%, well above the ECB ceiling rate of 2% (for the HICP).


  • As you can tell from the chart on the left the sense of there being separate business cycles in the US and in Europe is a sort of joke. The US and Euro area manufacturing indexes are plotted on top of one another and their sense of co-variation is unmistakable. Also the US is shown to be the male and E-zone is the female; that is to say, if we regard this as a dance, the US leads.

    In the recent mini-cycle, Europe has struck out a bit on its own. A US up-cycle from mid-2005 aborted early, turning to decline. Meanwhile, Europe has continued to expand and only recently has hit a plateau with hint of erosion. In the US, the down-cycle is only showing early signs of stabilization.

    yes"> We wonder if Europe needs the US more than the US needs Europe?

    The table above shows hath the E-zone readings, while off peak, are still very high in the range they have occupied since Mid-1997. The overall index is in the top 30% of its range and stands 6% above its average. Orders are similarly strong. Supplier deliveries are showing the weakest relative performance 10% below their average of the period.

            Placing NTC Euro-Zone Readings in their Respective Ranges
     Since June'98
    NTC E-zoneCurrentStd DevAverageSD% AvgMAXMINRangePercentile% of AVG
    NTC Index55.43.852.57.360.542.917.571.1106
    New Orders56.44.653.58.762.441.021.472.3105
    Backlogs53.93.152.05.957.647.210.564.1104
    Production57.44.254.27.762.843.019.972.8106
    Supplier Deliveries42.54.847.210.156.934.722.235.190
    Inventories48.71.048.32.050.446.24.358.9101
    Prices (Pd)66.19.859.716.476.537.738.873.3111
    Employment52.92.949.85.856.044.211.873.9106
    New Export Orders55.34.352.88.160.039.420.677.5105
    Note: From June 1997 to Date; except back logs since Nov '02

    The leading components of the NTC E-zone index are showing mixed trends. We form these trends as the difference between the 3 month and six month indexes. Supplier deliveries and prices-paid are turning up while new orders and order backlog trends are eroding.

    On balance, we can see the strong US-Europe linkages or commonalities. The history looks as though the US cycle gets transmitted to Europe, but Europe is recently showing some independent strength. However, it is also showing some sign of decay. It hardly seems as though a further rise in the Euro can do any good for Europe. But, so far so good.


  • The chart on the left shows the ISM clearly has broken through the up trend from its recession recovery and now is in a well-established downtrend. Its recent up-tick is still in the grip of that down-trending range. The table below shows the ISM and its components with a number of statistics that describe it/them. A quick perusal of the table shows why I like to evaluate the ISM by looking at the values in the LAST TWO columns instead of seeing if the index is above 50 (Rising) or below it (Falling). Each of these ISM components has a different range variability characteristic, range of values and mean. Even with the ISM above 50, as it is this month, it is still only in the 46th percentile of its range and at 96% of mean.

    Only inventories, prices and the trade-related components are above their mean values. Employment, at 99% of its mean, is nearly there.

    So while the ISM indicates expansion in the lexicon of the ISM we can see it is indeed a still wounded report that shows manufacturing is not yet up to par.Commentary Archive


  • The chart on the left shows the ISM clearly has broken through the up trend from its recession recovery and now is in a well-established downtrend. Its recent up-tick is still in the grip of that down-trending range. The table below shows the ISM and its components with a number of statistics that describe it/them. A quick perusal of the table shows why I like to evaluate the ISM by looking at the values in the LAST TWO columns instead of seeing if the index is above 50 (Rising) or below it (Falling). Each of these ISM components has a different range variability characteristic, range of values and mean. Even with the ISM above 50, as it is this month, it is still only in the 46th percentile of its range and at 96% of mean.

    Only inventories, prices and the trade-related components are above their mean values. Employment, at 99% of its mean, is nearly there.

    So while the ISM indicates expansion in the lexicon of the ISM we can see it is indeed a still wounded report that shows manufacturing is not yet up to par.

                            Placing ISM Readings in their Respective Ranges
     Since June 1998
    ISMCurrentStd DevAverageSD%AvgMAXMINRangePercentile% of AVG
    PM Index50.95.353.210.063.240.522.745.896
    New Orders51.66.755.812.071.338.432.940.193
    Backlogs47.06.750.413.466.536.030.536.193
    Production53.06.355.711.470.038.631.445.995
    Supplier Deliveries51.35.054.29.268.145.422.726.095
    Inventories47.53.945.88.653.637.116.563.0104
    Prices (Pd)65.512.662.120.388.032.056.059.8105
    Employment48.75.949.312.060.335.125.254.099
    New Export Orders55.53.553.66.660.244.315.970.4104
    Import Orders57.53.654.66.661.546.914.672.6105
    Avg Days Lead For:Since June 1998
    Production Material45.03.247.16.955.038.017.041.296
    Capital Expenditure110.08.7107.18.1120.086.034.070.6103
    Maint., Repair, & Ops22.02.122.59.529.017.012.041.798
    Note: From April 1991 to Date; except back logs since Jan 1993