Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics
Global| Dec 20 2018

U.S. Initial Claims for Unemployment Insurance Rise

Summary

Initial unemployment insurance applications increased to 214,000 (-12.4% y/y) during the week ended December 15 from an unrevised 206,000 during the prior week. Initial claims remained near the lowest level since 1969. The Action [...]

U

Initial unemployment insurance applications increased to 214,000 (-12.4% y/y) during the week ended December 15 from an unrevised 206,000 during the prior week. Initial claims remained near the lowest level since 1969. The Action Economics Forecast Survey expected 215,000 initial claims. The four-week moving average of initial claims eased to 222,000.

The latest claims figure covers the survey period for December nonfarm payrolls, and there was a 4.9% decline from the November period. During the last ten years, there has been a 73% correlation between the level of initial claims and the m/m change in nonfarm payrolls.

Continuing claims for unemployment insurance rose to 1.688 million (-13.4% y/y) in the week ending December 8 from 1.661 million in the prior week. The four-week moving average of continuing claims rose to 1.673 million.

The insured unemployment rate held steady at 1.2%, near the record low. The insured unemployment figures date back to 1971.

Insured rates of unemployment vary widely by state. During the week ending December 1, the lowest rates were in South Dakota (0.40%), North Carolina (0.43%), Nebraska (0.44%), Indiana (0.49%) and Florida (0.44%). The highest rates were in Illinois (1.53%), Connecticut (1.78%), California (1.92%), New Jersey (2.06%) and Alaska (3.10%). Among the other largest states by population, the rate was 0.96% in Ohio, 0.93% in Texas, 1.41% in New York, 0.57% in Georgia and 0.52% in Virginia. These state data are not seasonally adjusted.

Data on weekly unemployment claims going back to 1967 are contained in Haver's WEEKLY database, and they are summarized monthly in USECON. Data for individual states are in REGIONW. The expectations figure is from the Action Economics Forecast Survey, carried in the AS1REPNA database.

Unemployment Insurance (SA, 000s) 12/15/18 12/08/18 12/01/18 Y/Y % 2017 2016 2015
Initial Claims 214 206 233 -12.4 245 263 278
Continuing Claims -- 1,688 1,661 -13.4 1,961 2,136 2,267
Insured Unemployment Rate (%) -- 1.2 1.2

1.3
(Dec. 2017)

1.4 1.6 1.7
 

 

Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Index Declines; Pricing Pressure Holds Steady
by Tom Moeller   December 20, 2018

The Philadelphia Federal Reserve reported that its General Factory Sector Business Conditions Index declined to 9.4 during December from 12.9 in November. The Action Economics Forecast Survey median estimate was 15.7. During all of 2018, the index level eased to 21.1 from 27.4 in 2017. These figures are diffusion indexes where readings above zero indicate expansion. The percentage of firms reporting an improvement in business activity fell to 26.4%, down from the high of 48.2% in May of last year. The number reporting a weakening environment also fell to 17.0%.

Haver Analytics constructs an ISM-Adjusted General Business Conditions Index and it eased to 54.6 in December from 55.8 in November. This measure hit a cycle high of 61.9 in March. During the last ten years, there has been a 65% correlation between the quarterly ISM-adjusted Philadelphia Fed Index and quarterly real GDP growth.

Working lower was the shipments index to the lowest point in just over two years. and the inventories series reversed its November increase. The new orders index actually reversed most of the deterioration in November. Unfilled orders also rose while the rise in the delivery times index indicated slightly slower product delivery speeds.

The employment index held fairly steady near the level of this past June. During the last ten years there has been a 79% correlation between the employment index and the month-to-month change in factory sector payrolls. Twenty-four percent of respondents reported increased hiring, down from 30%, while a lessened six percent indicated a decrease. The average workweek reading fell sharply to its lowest level since late-2016. The index of future employment improved this month, but remained well below its May high.

The index of prices paid was little changed, but the prices received index improved to the highest level in four months. Forty-two percent of firms reported higher prices paid, down from 63.1% in August while a higher four percent paid less, though this was increased from July's reading of 0%. The future prices paid index was steady m/m and remained down from the April high.

The index measuring expectations of future business conditions improved m/m, but remained well below its high early last year.

The survey panel consists of 150 manufacturing companies in the third Federal Reserve District (which consists of southeastern PA, southern NJ and Delaware). The diffusion indexes represent the percentage of respondents indicating an increase minus the percentage indicating a decrease in activity. The ISM-adjusted figure, calculated by Haver Analytics, is the average of five diffusion indexes: new orders, shipments, employment, delivery times and inventories with equal weights (20% each). Each ISM-adjusted index is the sum of the percent responding "higher" and one-half of the percent responding "same."

The figures from the Philadelphia Federal Reserve dating back to 1968 can be found in Haver's SURVEYS database. The expectation from the Action Economics Forecast Survey is available in AS1REPNA.

Philadelphia Fed - Manufacturing Business Outlook Survey (%, SA) Dec Nov Oct Dec'17 2018 2017 2016
General Factory Sector Business Conditions 9.4 12.9 22.2 27.9 21.1 27.4 4.9
ISM-Adjusted Business Conditions 54.6 55.8 55.7 57.5 57.7 57.2 48.3
  New Orders 14.5 9.1 19.3 28.2 21.1 25.4 4.9
  Shipments 10.0 21.6 24.5 23.9 22.8 26.8 6.9
  Unfilled Orders 9.7 -4.8 -2.3 12.8 7.1 11.9 -5.6
  Delivery Time 6.7 5.0 0.2 11.0 9.5 10.6 -4.6
  Inventories -0.2 9.5 -0.8 -1.1 7.3 2.8 -9.6
  Number of Employees 18.3 16.3 19.5 19.7 21.5 16.2 -5.6
  Average Workweek 0.5 6.3 20.8 12.6 15.8 14.9 -5.4
  Prices Paid 38.0 39.3 38.2 27.8 46.2 30.4 13.5
Expectations - General Business Conditions; Six Months Ahead 31.7 27.2 33.8 52.7 36.9 47.1 33.7

 

U.S. Leading Economic Indicators Rise Slightly
by Tom Moeller  December 20, 2018

The Conference Board's Composite Index of Leading Economic Indicators edged 0.1% higher (5.9% y/y) during October following a 0.6% September gain, revised from 0.5%. It was the smallest rise since May. No change in the index level had been expected in the Action Economics Forecast Survey. The series is comprised of 10 components which tend to precede changes in the overall economy.

Movement amongst the components of the index remained mixed last month. Weakness was led by declines in the unemployment insurance claims component as well as lower stock prices and fewer building permits. Offsetting these negative influences were improved consumer expectations for business/economic conditions, a steeper interest rate spread between 10-Year Treasuries & Fed funds, higher ISM New Orders index and more nondefense capital goods orders. The average workweek and new orders for consumer goods had no effect on the index.

Three-month growth in the leading index declined to 4.8% (AR), the weakest growth since June.

The Index of Coincident Economic Indicators increased 0.2% (2.2% y/y) in October following a 0.1% uptick. Each of the index components contributed positively including changes in personal income less transfer payments, industrial production, nonagricultural payroll employment and manufacturing & trade sales.

Three-month growth in the coincident index held steady at 2.3% (AR). It remained improved from 1.6% growth early in the year, but below its 3.6% peak as of December.

The Index of Lagging Economic Indicators increased 0.4% (2.4% y/y) after a 0.2% decline, revised from -0.1%. It was the largest rise since May. The median duration of unemployment, the average prime rate charged by banks, the CPI for services and the consumer installment credit/personal income ratio contributed positively to the index change. The change in commercial & industrial loans outstanding and the change in unit labor costs contributed negatively to the index change. The ratio of business inventories-to-sales had no effect on the index change.

The three-month growth in the lagging index jumped to 1.9%, the quickest growth since June.

The ratio of coincident-to-lagging indicators is often considered to be another leading indicator of economic activity. As economic slack diminishes relative to current performance, the ratio will rise. It eased to 99.2 last month and reversed most of its September rise.

The Conference Board figures are available in Haver's BCI database; the components are available there, and most are also in USECON. The expectations are in the AS1REPNA database. Visit the Conference Board's site for coverage of leading indicator series from around the world.

Business Cycle Indicators (%) Nov Oct Sep Nov Y/Y 2017 2016 2015
Leading 0.1 0.6 5.9 4.1 1.2 4.2
Coincident 0.2 0.1 2.2 1.8 1.3 2.2
Lagging 0.4 -0.2 2.4 2.6 2.9 3.7
  • Prior to joining Haver Analytics in 2000, Mr. Moeller worked as the Economist at Chancellor Capital Management from 1985 to 1999. There, he developed comprehensive economic forecasts and interpreted economic data for equity and fixed income portfolio managers. Also at Chancellor, Mr. Moeller worked as an equity analyst and was responsible for researching and rating companies in the economically sensitive automobile and housing industries for investment in Chancellor’s equity portfolio.   Prior to joining Chancellor, Mr. Moeller was an Economist at Citibank from 1979 to 1984.   He also analyzed pricing behavior in the metals industry for the Council on Wage and Price Stability in Washington, D.C.   In 1999, Mr. Moeller received the award for most accurate forecast from the Forecasters' Club of New York. From 1990 to 1992 he was President of the New York Association for Business Economists.   Mr. Moeller earned an M.B.A. in Finance from Fordham University, where he graduated in 1987. He holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from George Washington University.

    More in Author Profile »

More Economy in Brief