
Euro Area PPI Inflation Drops Sharply...or Does It?
Summary
Short term inflation: dropping like a feather in a vacuum Like the HICP report the EMU PPI report shows a sharp ongoing drop in prices. Inflation has been cut sharply over short horizons. The headline (X construction) is dropping at [...]
Short term inflation: dropping like a feather in a
vacuum
Like the HICP report the EMU PPI report shows a sharp ongoing
drop in prices. Inflation has been cut sharply over short horizons. The
headline (X construction) is dropping at an 11% annualized pace over
three months and at a pace of -2.3% over six months. Yr/Yr the rate is
still positive at 2.3%.
Short term Ex energy trends are solid
Ex energy inflation at the PPI level in November is at a
-4.9% rate over 3-mos, a -0.2% pace over 6-mos and at +2.3% over
12-mos. The trending is the same: over shorter horizons the pace of
decline is more severe. This is what confirms that inflation is still
decelerating and has not yet stopped decelerating. In November both
total and ex energy inflation fell sharply month-to-month.
However…
For those who want to be more cautious, or even fearful of what may lie
in store over longer periods, the Yr/Yr charts are telling a different
story.
For the PPI inflation’s TREND is still…RISING
The chart shows that inflation viewed over long spans of time
also has cycles and the various sectors show there has been some
inflation percolating, cycling around an upward trend going back to the
sector lows around 1999. For ex energy inflation (not pictured) the low
dates from early 2002.
Inflation has cycles
Let’s use intermediate goods as the baseline example since
its cycles are clear. It has local inflation cycle peaks in 2000, 2003,
2004, 2006 and lower ‘peak’ in 2008. Other sectors have approximately
the same cycles with varying amplitudes. But for each sector the same
thing is true: the underlying trend for INFLATION has been rising as
the various cycles have gone through their respective boom-bust phases.
So the essential question is whether policy should look at where we are
in this inflation cycle or to be more worried about the underlying
rising inflation trend?
Identifying the trend
If you imagine a line touching the lowest point in each
inflation cycle for each sector you will note that intermediate goods
inflation is now below its lower cycle trend line (that slopes up) but
that has only just happened. Consumer goods inflation at the PPI level
is still above its trend (similarly constructed), so despite its
current plunge, the long term trend of consumer goods inflation
acceleration is still in play. Capital goods prices are still on the
rise and inflation has really not fallen significantly yr/yr for
capital goods. Taking ex energy inflation as an extra category (but not
pictured) we find that that series is below its cycle low point trend
line in 2008, but that is a very new development. It could signal that
the long term inflation uptrend is really is getting broken. But, of
course, the inflation dynamic is created in tandem with the growth
dynamic so policymakers need to keep the whole picture in mind to
decide. By the way, with fewer cycles to contend with it is clear that
this same logic applies to the EMU HICP rate through December. Its
inflation reading is falling rapidly but clearly has only just dropped
below its ceiling. History is replete with spikes down in inflation
that did not last. What is the ECB to do?
What went wrong?
If there is one thing this cycle has taught us it is to think
outside the box – or at least to plan ahead and think broadly. The
ECB’s backward looking Yr/Yr inflation ceiling did not serve it well to
make policy in this cycle. It kept the bank too tight for too long.
Only the financial crises with the ECB rate cut masked as part of a
global effort allowed it to bring rates lower with inflation still well
above its ‘ceiling.’ Inflation continued its rise in its headline even
as energy prices broke lower; it took an unprecedented crash in oil
prices to bring the headline back into the required zone (this
references HICP inflation).
Lessons from the brink and over the edge
The point we keep coming back to in this regard is that
decisions on interest rates need to be broader than just to look at a
headline price series- even if containing that series is the ultimate
policy goal. The Fed’s policy of looking at core inflation served it
much better in the cycle and provided a solid basis from which to
engineer that global coordinated rate cut that kicked things off while
the ECB’s headline inflation series was still well above its ‘ceiling’.
The ECB would be well advised to seek a more stable target for its
policy focus or it will again find itself behind the policy and
credibility eight-ball.
The policy dilemma
Looking ahead the ECB has a different sort of decision to
make. As we can see short term inflation is cycling lower, but on a
longer term perspective inflation trends do not look so unambiguously
good. What’s the ECB to do? On the basis of Yr/Yr inflation despite the
very rapid plunge in prices it is possible to continue to hear calls of
caution (from places like…Germany?) about the need to cut interest
rates. Yet the economy is weakening and the plunge in short term
inflation seems to be another signal about much weakness is cumulating.
The ECB probably will cut rates again but I expect there to be some
reluctance as Europe has not grasped the magnitude of this financial
crises and economic slowdown from the start. I don’t expect it to
become a believer now even though it finally agreed to take more
aggressive steps on the fiscal and monetary side. Call it
euro-reluctance, or something else, but it’s there and it is resistant
to the very idea of stimulus of any sort.
M/M | Saar | |||||
Euro Area 15 | Oct-08 | Sep-08 | 3-Mo | 6-Mo | Yr/Yr | Y/Y Yr Ago |
Total excl Constructions | -0.8% | -0.3% | -5.8% | 4.1% | 6.3% | 3.3% |
Excl Energy | -0.4% | 0.0% | -1.0% | 2.0% | 3.2% | 3.2% |
Capital Goods | 0.0% | 0.1% | 1.2% | 2.0% | 2.2% | 1.5% |
Consumer Goods | -0.1% | -0.1% | -0.1% | 1.0% | 2.6% | 3.4% |
Intermediate & Capital Goods | -0.6% | 0.0% | -1.6% | 2.5% | 3.6% | 3.0% |
Energy | -2.0% | -1.0% | -18.9% | 9.9% | 15.8% | 4.3% |
MFG | -1.5% | -0.5% | -9.9% | 0.1% | 3.5% | 3.9% |
Germany | 0.0% | 0.3% | -1.2% | 7.3% | 7.8% | 1.7% |
Excl Energy | -0.3% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 2.7% | 2.9% | 2.4% |
Italy | -1.5% | -0.5% | -7.7% | 2.0% | 5.2% | 3.7% |
Excl Energy | -0.7% | -0.1% | -2.3% | 0.8% | 3.0% | 3.2% |
UK | -4.2% | -1.0% | -26.7% | -0.8% | 11.4% | 5.9% |
Excl Energy | -0.5% | 0.3% | -0.7% | 5.6% | 7.0% | 3.8% |
Euro Area 15 Harmonized PPI excluding Construction |
Robert Brusca
AuthorMore in Author Profile »Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media. Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.