The past few weeks have seen a sharp escalation in tensions in the Middle East, triggering a rapid repricing across energy markets and a rise in geopolitical risk (chart 1). This comes at a time when the global economy is still heavily dependent on fossil fuels, leaving it structurally exposed to such shocks (chart 2), while longer-run increases in energy use per capita—driven in large part by industrialisation in China and elsewhere—have contributed to a rise in real energy prices over time (chart 3). Financial markets have been responding, with short-dated bond yields edging higher as expectations of monetary easing are reassessed (chart 4), and forward-looking sentiment indicators are showing early signs of softening (chart 5). At the same time, and of note, there are some tentative signs of stabilisation in parts of the global economy, notably in China where investment has picked up at the margin, supported by policy-led infrastructure spending (chart 6). Even so, it remains early days, and the balance of risks continues to tilt toward a more fragile outlook should the instability in the Middle East persist.
Introducing
Andrew Cates
in:Our Authors
Andy Cates joined Haver Analytics as a Senior Economist in 2020. Andy has more than 25 years of experience forecasting the global economic outlook and in assessing the implications for policy settings and financial markets. He has held various senior positions in London in a number of Investment Banks including as Head of Developed Markets Economics at Nomura and as Chief Eurozone Economist at RBS. These followed a spell of 21 years as Senior International Economist at UBS, 5 of which were spent in Singapore. Prior to his time in financial services Andy was a UK economist at HM Treasury in London holding positions in the domestic forecasting and macroeconomic modelling units. He has a BA in Economics from the University of York and an MSc in Economics and Econometrics from the University of Southampton.
Publications by Andrew Cates
Global| Mar 19 2026Charts of the Week: Energy Shock — Early Signals, Uncertain Fallout
by:Andrew Cates
|in:Economy in Brief
Global| Mar 11 2026Charts of the Week: Geopolitics Meets the Global Economy
The past few days have seen financial markets rattled by a sharp escalation of tensions in the Middle East, with oil prices rising, risk assets wobbling and investors reassessing the potential macroeconomic fallout from a possible energy shock. Yet, taken together, this week’s charts suggest that the global economic outlook has so far remained relatively resilient. Blue Chip consensus forecasts for 2026 growth have held steady in recent months, with Taiwan’s steadily improving outlook hinting at the ongoing influence of the global AI investment cycle. That said, forward-looking sentiment indicators are beginning to show some cracks: the latest Sentix expectations index registered a sharp deterioration in March, potentially reflecting rising geopolitical uncertainty. Inflation expectations, by contrast, have shifted only modestly, with forecasters making few meaningful revisions despite the recent surge in oil prices. Financial markets appear to share that view, as movements in two-year US Treasury yields—often a proxy for expectations of Federal Reserve policy—have not mirrored the sharp rise in crude prices, suggesting investors currently see the oil shock as temporary. The final charts highlight why energy markets nonetheless remain central to the outlook: many major economies remain significant net oil importers, and in much of Asia oil price movements feed quickly into consumer energy inflation. Should geopolitical tensions persist and keep crude prices elevated, these channels could yet transmit broader macroeconomic pressures in the months ahead.
by:Andrew Cates
|in:Economy in Brief
Global| Mar 04 2026Charts of the Week: Shockwaves from the Gulf
Geopolitical tensions in the Middle East have escalated sharply following joint air strikes by Israel and the United States on strategic targets in Iran. While the ultimate trajectory of the conflict remains highly uncertain, the episode highlights the potential for geopolitical shocks to ripple through multiple channels of the global economy—from energy markets and shipping routes to supply chains, inflation dynamics and monetary policy. In this week’s Charts of the Week, we present six charts that illustrate some of the key issues, implications and points to watch, including movements in geopolitical risk (chart 1), shipping activity through the Strait of Hormuz (chart 2), energy prices (chart 3), global supply chain pressures (chart 4), inflation surprises (chart 5) and the evolving structure of global electricity generation (chart 6). Together they provide a framework for thinking about how events in the region could shape the outlook for the world economy in the months ahead.
by:Andrew Cates
|in:Economy in Brief
Global| Feb 26 2026Charts of the Week: The AI Undercurrent
Over the past few days, financial markets have been navigating a fresh wave of policy and geopolitical cross-currents, with the US Supreme Court ruling on executive tariff authority adding a new layer of uncertainty to the trade outlook. At the same time, the AI investment boom continues to provide an important cyclical tailwind, even as investors remain alert to valuation risks, while renewed tensions involving Iran have reintroduced an energy risk premium. Against that backdrop, this week’s charts paint a picture of a global economy that is still expanding but becoming more differentiated. Latest flash PMI surveys confirm that global activity remains in growth territory despite some cooling in the US (chart 1). Strong semiconductor exports from Korea (chart 2) and surging US data-centre investment (chart 3) both underscore the continued force of the AI capex cycle, while a strong pickup in German capital goods orders (chart 4) hints at a more traditional, policy-linked investment impulse emerging in Europe. Meanwhile, the tight co-movement between oil prices and US front-end yields highlights (chart 5) the ongoing macro sensitivity to energy markets, and the recent downward drift in Japanese government bond yields — alongside softer data surprises — suggests that global bond markets may be receiving at least a modest anchoring impulse from Japan (chart 6).
by:Andrew Cates
|in:Economy in Brief
Global| Feb 19 2026Charts of the Week: AI, Policy Easing and a Shifting Risk Premium
Recent weeks have seen renewed market swings — a softer US dollar, rotation within equities and shifting rate expectations — as investors reassess valuations, policy risks and the durability of US exceptionalism. Yet a consistent macro thread runs through our charts this week. Global equities continued to outperform the US, hinting at a modest rise in the US risk premium alongside AI-valuation concerns (chart 1). At the same time, firmer bank lending growth across major economies reflects looser monetary policy and arguably helps explain why risk assets remain broadly supported despite volatility (chart 2). On productivity, a US pickup is evident but likely reflects capital deepening from AI infrastructure rather than a decisive surge in total factor productivity (chart 3). Industrial production in advanced Asia reinforces where that build-out is concentrated — at the heart of the semiconductor supply chain (chart 4) — while strong US orders for computers and electronic products underline the intensity of domestic demand for high-tech and AI-related equipment (chart 5). Finally, renewed equity inflows into Emerging Asia show investors positioning around this AI-centric growth dynamic (chart 6). In short, easier policy and AI-driven investment are sustaining momentum — but the breadth and durability of the productivity dividend remain a key open question.
by:Andrew Cates
|in:Economy in Brief
Global| Feb 12 2026Charts of the Week: AI-Led Growth Meets Monetary Divergence
While markets have been unsettled at times by shifting policy expectations, geopolitical noise and questions around valuation, underlying global macroeconomic signals remain broadly supportive. Upgrades to Blue Chip consensus growth forecasts for parts of Asia — led by Taiwan — point to the tangible impact of the AI-driven tech cycle, a theme reinforced by the sharp rebound in semiconductor exports from South Korea (charts 1 and 3). At the same time, revisions to inflation forecasts underline a growing divergence in monetary policy paths, with easing still expected in the US and UK, while tighter stances persist elsewhere (chart 2). Importantly, there is little evidence so far that global supply-chain pressures are re-emerging in a way that would reignite inflation, notwithstanding lingering trade policy tensions (chart 4). Against this backdrop, rising policy uncertainty — particularly in the US — stands out as a potential source of risk, with implications for asset pricing and risk premia (chart 5). Yet the improvement in global sentiment surveys and a continued run of positive economic surprises suggest that markets are responding not just to policy noise, but to a genuinely resilient and improving macroeconomic environment (chart 6).
by:Andrew Cates
|in:Economy in Brief
Global| Feb 05 2026Charts of the Week: Balanced Policy, Resilient Data and AI Narratives
Financial markets have experienced renewed gyrations in recent weeks, as shifting geopolitical risks, questions around Federal Reserve independence, renewed talk of US dollar “debasement,” and ongoing enthusiasm surrounding artificial intelligence have combined to drive volatility across asset classes. These cross-currents have also contributed to a degree of rotation away from high-flying technology stocks, as investors reassess valuations and the timing of anticipated AI-driven gains. Against this backdrop, the charts in this week’s COTW highlight several important themes. Policy rate expectations now appear more balanced globally, marking a clear shift away from the one-sided easing bias of the past two years (chart 1), even as resilient US data—underscored by the unexpected jump in the January ISM index and a run of positive economic surprises—continues to complicate the outlook for monetary easing (chart 2). At the same time, US financial conditions remain relatively benign, with limited evidence of widespread credit stress or aggressive tightening in lending standards (chart 3). Meanwhile, the sharp rebound in semiconductor sales and the accelerating rollout of large-scale AI models underscore why investors remain so focused on the AI narrative, even as Europe lags behind due to weaker industrial momentum and a smaller footprint in advanced chip production (charts 4 and 5). Finally, while some scepticism about AI’s ultimate economic impact persists, the latest survey results suggest a moderation in concerns that markets are materially overestimating its gains (chart 6). Taken together, these developments paint a picture of a US economy that remains more resilient than many had anticipated, set against a financial landscape increasingly shaped by powerful—if sometimes competing—narratives around geopolitics, policy, and technological transformation.
by:Andrew Cates
|in:Economy in Brief
Global| Jan 29 2026Charts of the Week: Weaker Dollar, Stronger Tech
Financial markets have seen renewed gyrations in recent weeks, with a weaker US dollar, higher interest rate volatility and shifting capital flows reviving discussion of a “Sell America” narrative — so far more a marginal rebalancing than a wholesale retreat. The Federal Open Market Committee left the federal funds rate unchanged at its latest meeting, as widely expected, but communications around the outlook for future easing were arguably a little more hawkish than anticipated, reinforcing a cautious and increasingly data-dependent policy stance. In our charts this week we begin with January’s flash PMIs, which point to ongoing expansion across most major economies but with clear cross-country divergence in momentum (chart 1). That uneven real-economy picture has been mirrored in FX: the broad trade-weighted dollar depreciated through the first half of 2025, stabilised later in the year, but has now softened more abruptly at the start of 2026—suggesting a shift in risk premia and capital-flow dynamics (chart 2). Consistent with that, consumer confidence has weakened noticeably in the US relative to the euro area and UK, with the deterioration looking more tied to politics and labour-market perceptions (chart 3). Even so, global equity sentiment has remained comparatively upbeat, supported by a still-favourable macro mix in which global growth surprises have tended to run ahead of expectations while inflation surprises have been softer—tentatively consistent with an improving supply-side backdrop that markets increasingly associate with AI (chart 4). Finally, that theme is reinforced by hard activity indicators: US orders and imports of advanced technology products remain strong (chart 5), and Taiwan’s production data show a parallel surge in electronics output upstream (chart 6), pointing to a still-powerful global tech cycle even as broader macro and market narratives become more unsettled.
by:Andrew Cates
|in:Economy in Brief
- Global| Jan 29 2026
Are We In An AI Bubble?
Excess, innovation and why this boom may still have room to run
Recent weeks have seen financial markets gripped by a shifting mix of narratives. A weaker US dollar, rising rate volatility and renewed geopolitical uncertainty have revived talk of a tentative “sell America” trade, as investors reassess US exceptionalism after several years of outperformance. At the same time, global equity markets have remained remarkably resilient, supported in large part by continued optimism around artificial intelligence and the powerful investment cycle it has unleashed.
Against this unsettled backdrop, a familiar question has returned to the centre of market debate: are prices being driven by fundamentals, or by faith? With artificial intelligence, that conversation has clearly arrived. Equity markets — particularly in the United States — have surged on the back of a relatively small group of AI-exposed firms that now account for a striking share of index gains. Valuations increasingly rest on the assumption that AI will deliver a sustained uplift to productivity, profits and long-run growth. Investors are no longer debating whether AI will transform the economy; instead, they are debating how quickly — and how completely — those gains will materialise.
Lessons From History
History offers a useful starting point. Truly transformative technologies almost always arrive alongside periods of financial excess. Railroads, electricity, telecoms and the internet all produced extraordinary investment booms that ultimately reshaped economic structures, even as they destroyed large amounts of capital along the way. The presence of a bubble never meant the technology was flawed. It meant expectations moved faster than cash flows, infrastructure deployment and balance-sheet reality. AI fits this historical pattern uncomfortably well.
In this environment, narrative often dominates near-term profitability, and that is typically how transformative technologies diffuse rapidly across the economy. But where bubbles become truly dangerous is not via investor enthusiasm itself, but in the financing structures that accompany large infrastructure build-outs. Equity investment in diversified firms with strong balance sheets is fundamentally different from debt-financed bets on long-lived assets whose viability depends on uncertain demand and rapidly evolving technology. Yet we are already seeing significant capital being channelled into data centres, energy infrastructure and specialised AI facilities, increasingly funded through project-level vehicles and long-dated financing. These investments rest on assumptions about sustained utilisation, manageable energy costs and technological continuity — assumptions that inevitably carry risk.
This should feel familiar. The late-1990s telecoms boom was not undone because fibre optics were useless, but because capacity was financed almost entirely with leverage long before revenues caught up. When pricing power collapsed, investors absorbed enormous losses, even as the infrastructure went on to support the digital economy that followed.
The Macro Dimension
However, there is also a macro dimension in this debate that deserves more attention, and this is where today’s AI boom still looks somewhat different from past excesses. The chart below contrasts private non-residential investment in the US with the financial balance of non-financial corporations. During the dot-com era, corporate investment surged at the same time as the corporate sector moved deep into financial deficit. Firms were spending far beyond internal cash flows, and increasingly reliant on external financing — particularly debt — to fund speculative expansion. That combination of soaring investment and widening financial imbalances was a classic Minsky-style warning sign.
by:Andrew Cates
|in:Viewpoints
Global| Jan 22 2026Charts of the Week: Seeing Green
This week’s data and market moves have been framed by an abrupt escalation in geopolitical tensions surrounding Greenland, which has served as a catalyst for broader financial unease rather than a standalone shock. The episode has sharpened investor focus on US policy predictability, amplifying concerns already evident in the charts on EU–US trade exposure, where tariff threats risk feeding directly into confidence effects and capital flows. At the same time, recent turbulence in Japanese government bonds appears to have been an underappreciated driver of the sell-off in US Treasuries, highlighting how global capital reallocation—rather than geopolitics alone—has contributed to higher US yields. These forces intersect with growing questions around the durability of US monetary credibility, as inflation expectations have shown signs of decoupling from traditional oil-price anchors, raising the sensitivity of markets to any perceived constraints on the Federal Reserve. Beyond the US, UK data delivered a modest upside surprise in headline inflation, with persistent services and wage pressures reinforcing a cautious policy backdrop for the Bank of England. In China, meanwhile, Q4 GDP growth of 4.5% y/y kept full-year expansion aligned with the government’s target, but continued weakness in the property sector remains a significant drag on investment and household confidence. Taken together, the week’s developments point to a global outlook increasingly shaped by geopolitical risk, capital-flow dynamics and domestic structural constraints, rather than by straightforward cyclical momentum alone.
by:Andrew Cates
|in:Economy in Brief
Global| Jan 15 2026Charts of the Week: Between Optimism and Uncertainty
The global backdrop remains unsettled, reflected in rising gold prices amid geopolitical tensions—most recently around Venezuela—and renewed political noise, including questions over Federal Reserve independence. At the same time, however, many major equity indices remain at or close to all-time highs, buoyed by optimism around AI and reinforced by a run of relatively benign US inflation readings. Against this mixed backdrop, the charts this week point to a global outlook that is becoming more differentiated rather than uniformly weaker. Blue Chip forecasts for 2026 growth have edged higher over the past six months, with upgrades concentrated in economies most exposed to the AI investment cycle, notably the US and parts of Asia (chart 1). Central bank expectations remain fluid: while panelists broadly anticipate easing by the Fed and Bank of England, conviction around timing is limited, and the Bank of Japan remains an outlier with further tightening still expected (chart 2). In the UK, that uncertainty sits alongside a deteriorating data flow, with negative economic surprises increasingly tilting market expectations toward an earlier BoE rate cut (chart 3). Turning to the US, special questions highlight a divide over whether AI is already having a noticeable macro impact or whether its effects will emerge more gradually, a tension that mirrors concerns about over-optimism in financial markets (chart4). That debate is echoed in the recent pick-up in US productivity growth and the step-change in business formation—developments that may reflect AI-related dynamics but which also warrant caution given the historically cyclical nature of productivity (chart 5). Finally, China’s trade data point to a continued re-orientation of export growth away from the US and toward Europe and ASEAN, consistent with evolving US trade policy and broader supply-chain realignment (chart 6).
by:Andrew Cates
|in:Economy in Brief
Global| Jan 08 2026Charts of the Week: Cooling Inflation, Diverging Growth
Over the past few weeks, global financial markets have taken comfort from cooling inflation, resilient earnings and continued upside surprises in the dataflow, with equity markets extending gains as confidence in a soft-landing outcome has firmed. While AI-related optimism was questioned toward the end of last year, amid valuation concerns and uncertainty over near-term payoffs, sentiment has improved again in recent days. Latest business surveys suggest little immediate cause for alarm on the global growth front (chart 1), despite clear signs of divergence across regions. At the same time, there are few near-term inflation concerns evident in the data, with global supply-chain pressures remaining subdued (chart 2). Taken together, these developments leave little immediate challenge to the prevailing outlook for monetary policy, with expectations for further gradual easing across several major economies remaining broadly intact (chart 3). At the same time, geopolitical shocks — most notably the upheaval in Venezuela — have reignited focus on energy market risks and sovereign debt uncertainties, adding complexity to oil price expectations and fiscal trajectories (chart 4). Shifting focus, China’s role also continues to remain pivotal: surplus industrial capacity and competitive export pricing continue to shape global trade and exert disinflationary influence (chart 5). Against this backdrop, public debt levels that are both elevated and still rising in many large economies underscore the structural imbalances that could limit policy flexibility and amplify market sensitivities in the immediate months ahead (chart 6).
by:Andrew Cates
|in:Economy in Brief
- of21Go to 1 page