Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics
Global| Aug 11 2009

U.S. Small Business Optimism Weakens Again As Hiring Intentions Remain Depressed

Summary

Times may be improving, but small business' sense of that has sagged of late. The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) indicated that for the second consecutive month small business optimism slipped. The July decline [...]


Times may be improving, but small business' sense of that has sagged of late. The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) indicated that for the second consecutive month small business optimism slipped. The July decline from June to an index level of 86.5 was to the lowest level since March. Moreover, the latest figure was down slightly from last year though it remained well improved from the lows of this past winter.

During the last ten years, there has been a 49% correlation between the level of the NFIB index and the two-quarter change in real GDP.

The percentage planning to raise employment remained slightly negative and the percentage with one or more job openings slipped to just 9%, nearly the lowest since 1982. During the last ten years there has been a 71% correlation between the NFIB employment percentage and the y/y change in nonfarm payrolls.

Driving the cautious hiring was the falling percentage of small businesses expecting the economy to improve, back to its lowest level since March. The percentage expecting credit conditions to ease also remained in its recent range while the percentage reporting that now is a good time to expand business held in its modestly positive range of recent months.

During the next 3-6 months, plans for capital spending also remained range-bound but modestly positive. This weakness in investment reflects not only diminished optimism about the economic outlook but poor profits. Forty-five percent of firms are reporting lower earnings this quarter versus last.

The largest, single most important problems seen by business were poor sales (32%), taxes (22%), government requirements (12%), insurance cost & availability (9%), competition from large businesses (5%) and inflation (3%).

The percentage of firms planning to raise prices held at 5% and that was near the record low. The percentage of firms actually raising prices slipped and remained in negative territory, near the record low. During the last ten years there has been a 69% correlation between the y/y change in the producer price index and the level of the NFIB price index.

About 24 million small businesses exist in the United States. Small business creates 80% of all new jobs in America and the NFIB figures can be found in Haver's SURVEYS database.

Why Are Banks Holding So Many Excess Reserves? from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York can be found here.

Nat'l Federation of Independent Business July June Y/Y 2008 2007 2006
Small Business Optimism Index (SA, 1986=100) 86.5 87.8 -1.9% 89.8 96.7 98.9

U.S. Worker Productivity JumpsDuring 2Q As Trend Improves

by Tom Moeller August 11, 2009

Businesses have managed their businesses well for the weakened economic environment. That's evident in the labor productivity gains during the last three quarters which stand in sharp contrast to the material declines during the economic downturns of the 1950s through the 1980s. Last quarter, improved management of labor costs was evident in a 6.4% (AR) surge in labor productivity in the nonfarm sector. It was the strongest increase since the third quarter of 2003 and the gain beat Consensus expectations for a 5.3% increase. (Revisions to past data incorporate the comprehensive revisions to the National Income & Product Accounts (NIPA) data that were reported on July 31st. )

Cuts to employment & hours-worked came in the face of a sharp output decline which totaled a record 5.6% y/y. As evident in the recent GDP report, last quarter the quarterly rate of business sector output decline slowed to 1.7% from 8.8% during 1Q. Nevertheless, businesses continued to cut employment & hours worked sharply; at a 7.6% annual rate after a 9.0% drop during 1Q.· Compensation costs weakened substantially with the recession. They barely rose at a 0.2% rate after the 2.4% 1Q decline. These weak figures combined with downward revisions to earlier data leave the y/y increase at just 1.3% which continues the downtrend from roughly 4.0% growth back to 2001.

Last quarter, the surge in productivity and the moderation in labor cost growth combined to drop unit labor costs. The 5.8% q/q decline was the second in a row and lowered the y/y change to -0.6%, the first negative reading since early-2004.

Nowhere was the productivity improvement more evident last quarter than in the factory sector. Worker productivity rose 5.3% which was the first quarterly increase in over one year. Output fell at a 9.9% rate (-15.0%) while hours worked dropped at a 14.4% rate (-13.9%). The benefit to workers was seen in a 5.8% rise in 2Q compensation. That rise lifted to y/y growth to 6.0% which was its strongest since 2003. The combination of strong productivity and strong compensation kept the quarterly increase in unit labor cost at just 0.5%. However, year-to-year, growth of 7.4% y/y is a multiple of last year's 2.2% growth.

The productivity & cost figures are available in Haver's USECON database.

Investing over the life cycle with the long-run labor income risk from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago can be found here. 

Nonfarm Business Sector (SAAR, %) 2Q '09 1Q '08 Y/Y 2008 2007 2006
Output per Hour 6.4 0.3 1.8 1.8 1.9 0.9
Compensation per Hour 1.2 -2.4 1.3 2.8 4.2 3.8
Unit Labor Costs -5.8 -2.7 -0.6 1.0 2.3 2.8

Gasoline Prices Again Move Higher

by Tom Moeller August 11, 2009

The economy must be improving if gasoline prices are rising. Or is it seasonal strength? The pump price for regular gasoline increased last week to an average $2.56 per gallon, though that still was down a nickel from last month's high. The increase added to the nearly one dollar (59%) rise from the December low. Yesterday, however, the pricing strength was even more evident with the twenty cent jump to $2.03 per gallon in the cash market price. Gasoline prices were up off the early-July low of $1.60. The figures are reported by the U.S. Department of Energy and can be found in Haver's WEEKLY & DAILY databases.

Crude oil prices also have strengthened. Light sweet crude oil prices (WTI) increased to $67.23 per barrel and they've roughly doubled this year. Yesterday the spot market price for light sweet crude oil rose further to $71.58 per barrel. Prices had reached a daily high of $72.68 earlier in July.

The pickup in energy prices is against the backdrop of a firming demand picture. It probably is seasonal, but during the last four weeks the demand for gasoline is up sharply. Year-to year, demand still is down by 1.8%, but that compares to a nearly 5% rate of decline last fall. Demand for distillate also is off sharply though residual fuel oil demand has moved higher. Finally, oil remains plentiful as evidenced by a 13.0% y/y rise in inventories of crude oil & petroleum products. Inventories of gasoline are flat y/y but crude oil inventories less the SPR are up by 17.8%. The figures on crude oil production and inventories are available in Haver's OILWKLY database.

Natural gas prices continued their move sideways last week. At an average of $3.44 per mmbtu (-62.8% y/y), the price was down by three-quarters from the high reached in early-July of last year of $13.19/mmbtu.

Weekly Prices 08/10/09 08/03/09 Y/Y 2008 2007 2006
Retail Regular Gasoline ($ per Gallon, Regular) 2.65 2.56 -30.5% 3.25 2.80 2.57
Light Sweet Crude Oil, WTI  ($ per bbl.) 71.57 67.07 -39.8% 100.16 72.25 66.12

Japan Consumer Confidence Rises But Remains Short Of Being Even Neutral

by Robert Brusca August 11, 2009

Japan paradox - The paradox of Japan’s consumer confidence is that the index is over the 50 percent mark of its range. It also stands right at its average level of readings going back to 1988. Even so this is a diffusion index with 50 as the theoretical point of neutrality. At a level of 39.4 we are instead at the average reading and at the mid-point of the range of values of consumer confidence readings going back about 20 years.

An unexpected standard - Since the economy usually is expanding, we would expect the average of a figure like consumer confidence to be above 50. But Japan has had some hard times during this period including its so-called lost decade. As for the index range we can’t be a so sure of its values or middle but a value near 50 also seems likely. The readings on Japan confidence do not conform to reasonable expectations. So instead so looking at this a diffusion index with 50 as neutral we should look at it with its man value set as neutral. In July 2009 the index stands at its mean reading –a mean reading based on about 20-years of observations. Adjusted for its own mean, therefore Japan’s confidence level has gotten to zero.

A better interpretation - Based on the plot of past values it looks like Japan’s consumers are a relatively content when the index resides between values of 50 and 45 on this index. So while the index reading is back to its long term average that is not yet a good enough spot. For now with some rise in machinery orders in hand it looks like Japan’s economy is getting back on something more like an even keel. Consumer prices are still falling so it’s too soon to say that Japan is out of the woods. In last month’s report Japan was the last large OECD economy still giving off negative readings on the OECD leading indicators series. But seeing some firmness in consumer confidence does give us some reason to take heart. Japan may be on the verge of turning the corner to better times.

Japan Consumer Confidence Percentile
  Monthly Change over Of Range*
  Jul-09 Jun-09 May-09 3-mos 6-mos 12-Mos Since 2004 Since 1988
Overall Livelihood 39.4 37.4 36.3 5.6 10.2 10.1 58.9 53.7
Income growth 37.0 35.8 35.3 3.6 5.6 0.7 38.8 28.5
Employment 34.0 31.7 28.0 10.7 19.8 3.3 48.3 48.3
Willing to buy Durable Goods 47.3 45.5 43.1 8.3 16.7 18.1 81.5 80.5
Value of Assets 37.8 37.6 35.9 5.6 9.7 2.9 46.6 46.6
For two-person households; * Percentiles since Mar 2004 when series became monthly or full period

Latvia And Lithuania Report Improvement In Their Current Accounts

by Louise Curley August 11, 2009

The Baltic States, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia have begun to repair their current accounts deficits which had reached as high as 18-28% of GDP . The first chart shows the current accounts as a percent of GDP for the three countries.

Today Latvia and Lithuania released balance of payments data for June. Both countries show a continuation of the current account surplus that started in February of this year, as shown in the second chart. In Latvia, it has been the surplus on income that has accounted for much of the current account surplus. However, there has also been a declining deficit on goods and services and finally a surplus in June. The balance on current transfers has been small and has had little effect on the overall current balance. The third chart shows the trends in the income and goods and services balances for Latvia.

In Lithuania, the trends are less clear. The income balance only turned positive in June and the balance on goods and services remains in deficit. However, in contrast to Latvia, current transfers have been the major factor accounting for the surplus on current account, as can be seen in the fourth chart.

  Jun 09 May  09 Apr 09 Mar09  Feb 09
Latvia (Thousand Lats)
Current Account 237.73 139.18 73.97 27.04 8.89
Goods and Service Balance 23698 -2584 -23448 -58220 -33661
Income Balance 201894 63640 53676 58454 42749
Lithuania (Mil Litai)          
Current Account 424.86 47.06 10.79 62.05 124.66
Goods and Service Balance -32.41 -210.29 -192.79 -228.63 -19.09
Income Balance 150.83 -158.45 -138.59 -146.09 -163.31
Current Transfers306.07 306.07 415.80 337.17 436.77 307.06
  • Prior to joining Haver Analytics in 2000, Mr. Moeller worked as the Economist at Chancellor Capital Management from 1985 to 1999. There, he developed comprehensive economic forecasts and interpreted economic data for equity and fixed income portfolio managers. Also at Chancellor, Mr. Moeller worked as an equity analyst and was responsible for researching and rating companies in the economically sensitive automobile and housing industries for investment in Chancellor’s equity portfolio.   Prior to joining Chancellor, Mr. Moeller was an Economist at Citibank from 1979 to 1984.   He also analyzed pricing behavior in the metals industry for the Council on Wage and Price Stability in Washington, D.C.   In 1999, Mr. Moeller received the award for most accurate forecast from the Forecasters' Club of New York. From 1990 to 1992 he was President of the New York Association for Business Economists.   Mr. Moeller earned an M.B.A. in Finance from Fordham University, where he graduated in 1987. He holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from George Washington University.

    More in Author Profile »

More Economy in Brief