
Flash PMI’s Turn in EMU
Summary
PMI Signals Are Lagging - PMI’s have lagged the pickup but they are near to neutral and the Markit overview index has reached the neutral mark of 50 in August. Markit’s overall PMI reading for the Euro Area rose to this neutral level [...]
PMI Signals Are Lagging - PMI’s have lagged
the pickup but they are near to neutral and the Markit overview index
has reached the neutral mark of 50 in August. Markit’s overall PMI
reading for the Euro Area rose to this neutral level of 50 in August
lagging behind the GDP signals that in Q2 already turned up for two key
E-Zone countries (Germany and France) and with the Zone’s own GDP
barely falling. Purchaser indices that usually are more sensitive than
other macro-data have not been leading in Europe and that is a point to
ponder.
Large jumps in August play catch-up --
The jumps in the respective MFG and Services indices were large. For
Services it is the largest jump in its history that extends back to
mid-1998. For the MFG index it is the eighth strongest jump in a
history that goes back to mid-1997.
Still, the fact that the big signal from the PMIs is lagging
is a curiosity.
Thinking more about PMIs -- PMI indices are
diffusion indices and formally they are indices of the breadth of
change in a certain direction (up or down, greater or less) rather than
of strength. The overall index is a weighted average of components that
look at specific aspects of an industry getting diffusion responses on
each. However, these indices are used as a proxy for strength since the
correlation with ‘strength’ is high for ‘breadth’. Still we should bear
in mind always that ‘strength’ is not in fact ‘breadth’, they are
different things and sometimes the difference matters, even if most of
the time it does not.
Viva la difference?? If you have never
thought of the PMIs this way before, note that this concept has been
long in play in analyzing trends in the stock market. The stock market
index is a weighted average of stocks, an index that goes up and down,
but technicians also look at indicators of ‘breadth’. And when they do,
they DO NOT call them ‘strength’ but when breadth and strength go
together a rally’s strength is said to be more powerful. Sometimes the
market goes ‘up’ but decliners ‘outpace’ advancers. This is exactly the
same thing as looking at output Vs its diffusion. Output and diffusion
do not always go in the same direction. Manufacturing output is like
the stock index and the MFG PMI is its breath measure. Services output
is compared to the breadth of the services PMI. But in the case of our
economic statistics we get the breadth reports much more quickly than
we get the output reports and so the diffusion indices take on a life
of their own and become proxies for ‘output.’
The diffusion difference - What the
diffusion indices usually do, is to pick up small improvements that
might be scattered around the economy and lost. Diffusion indices
create a signal that would otherwise get lost in the aggregation of
data with weighting always going to the largest of reporters. So this
time around it seems that the opposite is happening. A few larger
reporting firms are doing better and driving the macro -data higher
while the smaller firms are not yet on board for the ride. This is not
surprising with all the government intervention (…in Europe, the UK and
the US, in fact) since government tends to work ‘best’ with big
business. If the assistance works properly (or at all) stimulating
output at the larger firms (like auto makers) should create some
knock-on effects that will draw other firms into the upswing. And the
PMI reports may be signaling that, in August, this is finally
happening. But this process is a bit like trying to start a fire with
wet wood on windy day. Just because you have gotten a spark does not
means you will be able to nurse a bone-warming bonfire out of it.
Still, with a spark, you have a chance. And there is some tentative
evidence that growth is spreading- at last. Getting the diffusion
indices on board is crucial – they remain important barometers of the
success in spreading growth.
FLASH Readings | ||
---|---|---|
Markit PMIs for the E-Zone | ||
MFG | Services | |
Aug-09 | 47.87 | 49.53 |
Jul-09 | 46.25 | 45.69 |
Jun-09 | 42.62 | 44.65 |
May-09 | 40.68 | 44.82 |
Averages | ||
3-Mo | 43.18 | 46.53 |
6-Mo | 38.98 | 44.58 |
12-Mo | 39.28 | 44.11 |
127-Mo Range | ||
High | 60.47 | 62.36 |
Low | 33.55 | 39.24 |
% Range | 53.2% | 44.5% |
Robert Brusca
AuthorMore in Author Profile »Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media. Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.