Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics
Japan
| Sep 29 2023

Japan’s Industrial Production Is Mixed in August

Industrial production in Japan in August rose by 0.2% after falling by 1.6% in July. Manufacturing output in August fell by 0.2% after falling by 2.4% in July. Overall industrial production has made a gain while manufacturing production is pulling back slightly.

Sequential growth rates from 12-months to six-months to three-months show lessening weakness culminating in a small positive growth rate over three months for total industry output. Overall industrial production falls at a 3.4% annual rate over 12 months, falls at a 1.1% annual rate over six months, and then makes a 6% annual rate positive gain over three months. Manufacturing follows suit. Its sequential rebound shows output falling by 3.8% over 12 months, falling at a 2.7% annual rate over six months, then advancing at an 8.5% annual rate over three months. While the monthly data are somewhat chaotic, both overall and manufacturing industrial production are showing accelerating sequential growth.

The sequential acceleration is borne out by the chart at the top of this report; however, it's part of a still very flat growth process where we can see that three-month, six-month, and 12-month growth rates for industrial output have been in a narrow range and have been somewhat arbitrarily changing places for a relatively long period of time. The chart traces data back to September 2022 and on this timeline no clear pattern of acceleration over any sustained period can be identified.

The paradox here is that quarter-to-date all industry and sector as well as aggregate measures are showing a decline in output, two months into the third quarter. The sequential growth rates, on the other hand, give us some sense of an acceleration in progress. These two measures conflict with one another.

The manufacturing industries, textiles, and transportation, show sequential growth rates that are getting progressively weaker from 12-months to six-months to three-months. These are contrary to the trends for manufacturing overall.

By sector, consumer goods output is up by 1.3% over 12 months and gains at a 2% rate over six-months but then drops at a 13.2% annual rate over three months – it is decelerating. Intermediate goods show the progressive acceleration that we see in the headline as output falls by 2.6% over 12 months, falls by 0.4% at an annual rate over six months, and then advances by 4.4% at an annual rate over three months. Investment goods show an unclear sequential pattern falling by 11.1% over 12 months, reducing that drop to -4.7% annualized over six months, but then having an accelerated drop at a -20.1% rate over three months.

Mining shows a pattern that looks close to progressive weakness, with an 8.6% decline over 12 months, a similar 7.6% decline over six months, followed by an accelerated 17.3% annual rate fall over three months.

Not surprisingly electric & gas utilities output shows persistent strength with output rising 2.2% over 12 months, advancing at a 9.5% pace over six months, and rising at a a 24.9% pace over three months. Utilities output simply feeds current activity and demand and there is less ability to stockpile output from the sector.

On balance, Japanese output shows mixed trends and trends that are not very strong; there may be some sequential acceleration in the works overall, but it's within a pattern that's been in play for about two years so it's not a striking sequential acceleration. In the quarter-to-date, most of the industry and sector patterns show declines are underway. Individual sectors and industries in the table do not show strength although there is a progressive trend for investment goods and real strength and electric and gas and the utility sector. Still, none of that is broad enough or important enough to kindle optimism about the future for the industrial sector.

  • Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media.   Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.

    More in Author Profile »

More Economy in Brief