Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics
Global| May 23 2018

State Coincident Indexes

Summary

The Philadelphia Federal Reserve has released updated estimates of coincident indexes by state. The coincident indexes are computed from a dynamic factor model relating a number of other monthly variables (primarily from the labor [...]


The Philadelphia Federal Reserve has released updated estimates of coincident indexes by state. The coincident indexes are computed from a dynamic factor model relating a number of other monthly variables (primarily from the labor market) available at the state level. The derived indexes are transformed to have a trend comparable to that of a state’s real GDP. With this release, the levels of the indexes are now presented in the form that their average value for 2007 is equal to 100. While the Philly measures provide only a broad-brush idea of developments in a state’s economy, the common construction allows one to get a better sense of how a state is doing relative to others.

The April numbers show increases in activity in virtually all the nation. The comparable national measure was 2.8% higher than a year earlier. Michigan was the only state to show a decline over the last 12 months, but the gains in West Virginia and Arkansas were less than one-half percent. California was the fastest-growing state, with its index up 4.7%. A number of other states also reported gains of 4 percent or higher, perhaps most importantly (for its national weight, Texas). Still, a full 35 states reported increases between 1.9% (Louisiana) and 3.9% (Florida).

The write-up for the release of the data emphasizes growth over the last three months. There too, there appears to be reasonably widespread growth. Maryland was the only state where April’s level of activity was said to be below January’s. 8 states saw gains between .1% and .6%; 11 reported growth in excess of 1.0%, while 30 were in the .6% to 1.0% range. Of the 4 largest states, Texas saw growth above 1.0%, while California, New York, and Florida were all in that .6% to 1.0% area (though California’s increase, from the data issued by the Bank, appears to have been 1.04%!).

  • Charles Steindel has been editor of Business Economics, the journal of the National Association for Business Economics, since 2016. From 2014 to 2021 he was Resident Scholar at the Anisfield School of Business, Ramapo College of New Jersey. From 2010 to 2014 he was the first Chief Economist of the New Jersey Department of the Treasury, with responsibilities for economic and revenue projections and analysis of state economic policy. He came to the Treasury after a long career at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, where he played a major role in forecasting and policy advice and rose to the rank of Senior Vice-President. He has served in leadership positions in a number of professional organizations. In 2011 he received the William F. Butler Award from the New York Association for Business Economics, is a fellow of NABE and of the Money Marketeers of New York University, and has received several awards for articles published in Business Economics. In 2017 he delivered Ramapo College's Sebastian J. Raciti Memorial Lecture. He is a member of the panel for the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia's Survey of Professional Forecasters and of the Committee on Research in Income and Wealth. He has published papers in a range of areas, and is the author of Economic Indicators for Professionals: Putting the Statistics into Perspective. He received his bachelor's degree from Emory University, his Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and is a National Association for Business Economics Certified Business EconomistTM.

    More in Author Profile »

More Viewpoints