
Empire State Factory Sector Index Improves; Pricing Power Collapses
by:Tom Moeller
|in:Economy in Brief
Summary
The Empire State Factory Index of General Business Conditions rose to 3.09 during May after falling below break-even to -1.19 in April. The figure from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York remained well below the 27.41 peak reached [...]
The Empire State Factory Index of General Business Conditions rose to 3.09 during May after falling below break-even to -1.19 in April. The figure from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York remained well below the 27.41 peak reached last September. The latest compared to expectations for 4.0 in the Action Economics Forecast Survey.
Based on these figures, Haver Analytics calculates a seasonally adjusted index that is compatible to the ISM series. The adjusted figure gained slightly m/m to 52.1 but was below the June 2014 peak of 55.4. A rising level of activity is indicated by a figure above 50. Since inception in 2001, the business conditions index has had a 68% correlation with the change in real GDP.
Movement in the component series remained mixed. Modest improvement in new orders and inventories led May's gain in the total. Employment, however, moved down to its lowest point since last July. During the last ten years, there has been a 72% correlation between the index level and the m/m change in factory sector payrolls. The shipments series was roughly unchanged indicating moderate growth. Unfilled orders also were little-changed, showing falling order backlogs. The delivery times series dropped sharply, showing the quickest delivery speeds since December.
The prices paid index deteriorated to its lowest level since July 2012. Seventeen percent of respondents reported paying higher prices, down from 79% in mid-2008. Seven percent realized lower prices, nearly the most since none did early in 2012. During the last ten years, there has been a 70% correlation between the index and the 3-month change in the intermediate goods PPI.
Looking ahead, the Empire State index of expected business conditions in six months backpedaled 29.81. Employment, unfilled orders, delivery times and capital spending each fell sharply. New orders, shipments and the average workweek were comparatively stable. The index of expected prices paid declined to the lowest level since the middle of 2009.
The Empire State figures are diffusion indexes which are calculated by subtracting the percent of respondents reporting poorer business conditions from those reporting improvement. Thus, they have a good correlation with growth in the series covered. The data is available in Haver's SURVEYS database. The ISM-adjusted headline index is calculated by Haver Analytics. The series date back only to 2001. The Consensus expectation figure can be found in Haver's AS1REPNA database.
Empire State Manufacturing Survey | May | Apr | Mar | May'14 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General Business Conditions Index (ISM Adjusted, >50=Increasing Activity, SA) | 52.1 | 51.7 | 51.7 | 54.9 | 52.4 | 50.0 | 51.8 |
General Business Conditions (Diffusion Index, %, SA) | 3.09 | -1.19 | 6.90 | 16.95 | 11.83 | 3.87 | 4.22 |
New Orders | 3.85 | -6.00 | -2.39 | 10.03 | 7.89 | 1.16 | 1.46 |
Shipments | 14.94 | 15.23 | 7.93 | 16.99 | 12.09 | 4.52 | 11.20 |
Unfilled Orders | -11.46 | -11.70 | -13.40 | -1.10 | -9.03 | -8.74 | -8.83 |
Delivery Time | -10.42 | -4.26 | -2.06 | -1.10 | -5.17 | -3.52 | -0.30 |
Inventories | 7.29 | 2.13 | -5.15 | 2.20 | -1.80 | -5.73 | -2.91 |
Number of Employees | 5.21 | 9.57 | 18.56 | 20.88 | 10.85 | 3.73 | 8.62 |
Prices Paid | 9.38 | 19.15 | 12.37 | 19.78 | 20.90 | 21.53 | 24.71 |
U.S. Industrial Production Declines While Factory Output Holds Steady
by Tom Moeller May 15, 2015
Overall industrial output fell 0.3% during April (+1.9% y/y) following a revised 0.3% March shortfall, initially reported as -0.6%. A 0.1% slip in production had been expected in the Action Economics Forecast Survey. Manufacturing sector production remained unchanged (2.4% y/y) after a 0.3% gain. Mining output declined 0.8% (+1.3% y/y), the sixth decline in the last seven months. Oil & gas well drilling was off 14.5% (-46.5% y/y). Utility output fell 1.3% (+0.1% y/y) after a 5.4% drop.
Within the factory sector, automotive product production rose 1.5% (9.0% y/y) and added to a 4.1% jump. Appliance, furniture & carpeting output recovered 1.3% (3.6% y/y) following three months of sharp decline. Business equipment production fell, however, by 0.4% (+2.3% y/y), reversing the prior month's rise. Transit equipment manufacturing fell 0.4% (+3.4% y/y) after a 2.0% jump. In the nondurables sector, clothing output was off 0.2% (+1.0% y/y), down for the second month in three. Chemical product manufacturing was unchanged (4.1% y/y) after a 0.1% dip.
The special aggregate series indicated that production in high technology industries improved 0.2% (0.7% y/y) following four straight monthly declines. Computers & office equipment output increased 1.4% (6.8% y/y) and communications equipment production gained 0.7% (1.7% y/y). Factory sector production excluding the high-tech sector was unchanged (2.4% y/y) after a 0.4% rise. Manufacturing production excluding both high-tech and autos slipped 0.1% (+2.1% y/y) after a 0.1% uptick.
The capacity utilization rate fell to 78.2% and remained below the recovery high of 79.8% reached in November. Mining sector utilization plunged to 84.0%, the lowest level since early 2011. In the factory sector, the capacity utilization rate slipped to 77.2%, down from 78.1% in November. Total industry capacity rose 2.9% y/y while factory sector capacity increased 2.0% y/y.
Industrial production and capacity data are included in Haver's USECON database, with additional detail in the IP database. The expectations figure is in the AS1REPNA database.
Industrial Production (SA, % Change) | Apr | Mar | Feb | Apr Y/Y | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Output | -0.3 | -0.3 | -0.1 | 1.9 | 4.2 | 2.9 | 3.8 |
Manufacturing | 0.0 | 0.3 | -0.2 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 4.1 |
Consumer Goods | -0.3 | -0.1 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 1.7 |
Business Equipment | -0.4 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 5.2 | 3.6 | 7.5 |
Construction Supplies | 0.1 | -1.3 | -0.6 | 3.5 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Materials | -0.2 | -0.2 | -0.3 | 2.6 | 5.1 | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Utilities | -1.3 | -5.4 | 4.9 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 2.1 | -2.1 |
Capacity Utilization (%) | 78.2 | 78.6 | 78.9 | 79.0 | 79.1 | 78.0 | 77.3 |
Manufacturing | 77.2 | 77.3 | 77.2 | 77.0 | 77.2 | 76.1 | 75.5 |
U.S. Debt Growth Is Restrained
by Tom Moeller May 15, 2015
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York reported earlier this week that y/y growth in household debt eased during Q1 to 1.7%, the slowest growth rate since Q3'13. The slowdown occurred as quarterly growth slackened to 0.8% (AR), the slowest rate since last year's second quarter. The easing left debt per capita stable at 45.78%, about where it's been since early last year. Mortgage borrowing posted the greatest showdown with a y/y advance of 0.1%, down from 3.3% early last year. From 2009 to 2013 mortgage debt was being liquidated. Debt acquisition in other categories was restrained, notably in home equity financing where balances declined at a 3.0% rate. They've been declining throughout the economic recovery. Alternatively, credit card debt acquisition has accelerated to 3.8%, up from liquidation from 2009 through early 2013.
Credit balances per capita
Data on Household Debt is carried in Haver's USECON database.
Tom Moeller
AuthorMore in Author Profile »Prior to joining Haver Analytics in 2000, Mr. Moeller worked as the Economist at Chancellor Capital Management from 1985 to 1999. There, he developed comprehensive economic forecasts and interpreted economic data for equity and fixed income portfolio managers. Also at Chancellor, Mr. Moeller worked as an equity analyst and was responsible for researching and rating companies in the economically sensitive automobile and housing industries for investment in Chancellor’s equity portfolio. Prior to joining Chancellor, Mr. Moeller was an Economist at Citibank from 1979 to 1984. He also analyzed pricing behavior in the metals industry for the Council on Wage and Price Stability in Washington, D.C. In 1999, Mr. Moeller received the award for most accurate forecast from the Forecasters' Club of New York. From 1990 to 1992 he was President of the New York Association for Business Economists. Mr. Moeller earned an M.B.A. in Finance from Fordham University, where he graduated in 1987. He holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from George Washington University.