Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics

Introducing

Robert Brusca

Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media.   Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.

Publications by Robert Brusca

  • The ZEW experts' macro conditions readings for January show deteriorations for Germany, the EMU, and the United States. The German reading logs in at -10.2 in January while the EMU logs a reading of -6.2. In sharp contrast, the U.S. logs a reading of +41.1 (diffusion readings for individual reporters are not shown here). Germany has a 44.6-percentile queue standing, the U.S. has a 57.4-percentile queue standing and the EMU has a 64.3-percentile queue standing. Among the three assessments, only Germany, with a standing below its 50th percentile, is performing at a pace below its median.

    Economic expectation readings are available for Germany and the U.S. Germany has the higher diffusion reading at +51 (not shown) while the U.S. has a +22-diffusion reading. This translates to a 72-percentile queue standing for Germany and a 60.5 percentile queue standing for the U.S. Both are above their respective medians for the period (the median occurs at a ranking of 50). And the diffusion reading for both Germany and the U.S. rose sharply on the month.

    The early take on the ZEW outlook is that expectations have held their ground in January even has macro conditions assessments have slipped a bit. This may be an acknowledgement that the virus set back some activity in January but is not expected to continue to have that effect going forward.

    Inflation expectations are negative in January and are lower on the month in the EMU, Germany, and the U.S. This is an interesting finding since inflation has been flaring and it is and has been troubling and excessive relative to the ECB target as well as the U.S. inflation target. However, what inflation is and what it is expected to be are different things. Inflation expectations peaked around March 2021 at diffusion values in their 80s for the EMU, Germany, and the U.S. In January these expectations are coalescing around a diffusion value of -40… as actual inflation has flared expectations have pulled back. While central bankers have played dumb about inflation (see no inflation, hear no inflation, speak of no inflation – and expect it to go away on its own), the ZEW experts were right on (prescient) and foresaw this blast in the making. The ECB for now seems unconcerned and is of the belief that no policy change is required, and that inflation will simply deflate. Or maybe even Godot will show? In the U.S., the central bank is making preparations to hike rates by winding down and eliminating asset purchases and signaling that it expects to raise rates multiple times in the year ahead.

    Not only were ZEW expectations on inflation elevated earlier, but ZEW respondents now see central banks as closer to acting to contain it (I guess that would be despite some official pronouncements to the contrary). We can compare responses to the levels of those same responses of last year when ZEW inflation expectations were elevated. At that time, short-term interest rate expectations hovered near 10 for the U.S and the EMU. The expectations for the EMU are up to a diffusion value of 25 while the U.S. is up to 81. A net rise of over 70 points for the U.S. and a net rise of about 13 points for the EMU. So it appears that the ECB's declaration on rates is holding back ZEW expectations. Still, the ranking for rate hike expectations in the U.S. and in the EMU are high at the 74% mark in the EMU and the 84-percentile level in the U.S.

    Turning to longer term rates, there are extremely high percentile standings for long-term rate expectations in both the U.S. and Germany. However, the average shift in expectations is smaller for long-term rates (+10) than for short-term rates (+20). This suggests – and the above responses are consistent with this - that ZEW experts expect rates hiked at the short end to be more powerful than the rate rises in the long end or at least to be sufficient to stop inflation. And this is reflected in the way inflation expectations have been pulled back as we saw. The monthly change in long rate expectations was higher in the U.S. this month than it was for Germany.

    But in this environment the stock market is no longer as favored. Stock market percentile standings are all below 50 indicating a worse than median expectations and the month-to-month decline is an average drop for the U.S., German, and EMU markets of 17 points.

  • United Kingdom
    | Jan 14 2022

    U.K. IP Continues to Make Headway

    U.K. industrial output rose by 1% in November after gaining 0.2% in October, marking the first back-to-back monthly gains since February and April.

    Output seems to be on some sort of an upswing as three-month growth is at an annual pace of 2.9% compared to nearly identical growth rates of 0.2% and 0.3% over six months and 12 months, respectively. In the quarter-to-date (QTD), output is rising at a 1.8% annual rate. And output still has not recovered to its pre-covid level as it is 1.8% below its level of January 2020.

    Sector stories Three of four sectors made gains in November with consumer nondurables as the exception. For these four sectors over the last three months, there are 12 month-to-month changes in output, and among those twelve, five of them showed month-to-month declines. The other seven showed increases. That comparison points out that while output is rising more than falling, the industrial sector is still quite mixed. The longer trends from 12-months to six-months to three-months show no clear trends The overall mostly accelerating pattern actually does not get support from individual sectors, but three of four sectors do have a three-month growth rate above their respective 12-month growth, a sort of 'poor-mans' indication of acceleration. But only two of four sectors show positive advances in the QTD growth: consumer nondurables and intermediate goods. Output is contracting so far in Q4 for consumer durable goods and for capital goods. Sectors also are mixed on the view of recovery from Covid. Consumer nondurables and intermediate goods show output at a higher level in November than in January 2020. But consumer durables goods and capital goods show output lagging their January 2020 performance by 5.4% and 11.4%, respectively. Those are relatively large shortfalls.

    The table highlights five industries as well. Among their most recent three-months (where there are 15 month-to-month changes), nine of them show drops in output against only six showing advances. Only one sector shows a clear three-month trend; that is textile and leather goods where growth in output is decelerating. Only one of five industries shows three-month growth faster than 12-month growth- and that is motor vehicles & trailers where the three-month negative growth rate is smaller than the 12-month negative growth rate. Only two of these five industries show output stronger in November than in January 2020: (1) food, beverages & tobacco and (2) textiles & leather.

  • Japan’s LEI rose in November to 103 from 101.5. This is the second increase in a row. As the table shows the LEI took a one-point tumble from 101.2 in August, to 100.2 in September then it rose to 101.5 in October and now to 103.0. This is a nice string of increases. But the steady gains still leave the LEI index below its level of July 2021 when it stood at 103.8. In August of 2021, the index fell sharply. But it has recovered steadily since then.

    The table shows the LEI in several different guises and settings along with other economic metrics on Japan’s economy all on the same timelines.

    Looking at the increases in these metrics from January of 2020 shows the LEI is up by 14.1%. The METI industry index is lower by 1.4% on this same timeline. The Teikoku indices are uneven with three sectors still below their January 2020 levels (retail, services, and construction) but with wholesaling and manufacturing higher on balance. The Teikoku metrics are quite different from the economy-watcher metrics that show solid and strong gains on this same timeline for all its sectors- each showing a double-digit gain since January of 2020. The Teikoku readings lag the LEI and the Economy-watcher readings.

    The LEI has an index level in November with an 88.8 percentile standing. This contrasts to its 76.9 percentile standing when ranked and evaluated on its 12-month growth on the same period. Those differences in rankings are not huge but for an index like the LEI that is based on underlying economic variables that grow over time, the growth metric is more important and more telling than the index level standing. The more meaningful LEI ranking is the lower growth rate ranking.

    Compare the LEI ranking to the rankings of the Teikoku and economy-watcher indices. The index level ranking shows economy-watcher indices across the board are high and strong with rankings in their respective 90th percentiles. However, the level ranking for the Teikoku sectors are in the 36 percentile to 65th percentile range, a much lower habitat.

    The growth rate rankings over the last 12-months show somewhat more similar rankings. The economy-watcher indices are in a range from the 83rd percentile to the 96th percentile. The Teikoku rankings on growth rates span a ranking of the 49.7th percentile to the 83rd percentile for services and an 81st percentile for manufacturing.

    I contrast to these comparisons the METI industrial index has a 20th percentile index level standing and a 76.9 percentile growth ranking. The METI index level reading is weaker than anything else but in growth terms it is on board with the other surveys

    There is no truly best index. The economy watcher indices are evaluations of economic onlookers in various sectors. Teikoku is more of a traditional survey as is the METI index. However, all surveys show ongoing improvement over the last three months and show a falloff in August from July as we saw in the LEI. We seem to be getting the same signals from all the surveys on the economy; there is just not one uniform way to map them into a single current standing. Every picture tells a story; every angle tells a different story.

    The indices are clear about a few things. Japan’s economy is progressing. On its rate of progress there is some disagreement, but it is progressing. Current evaluations from the LEI, Teikoku, METI, and economy-watchers indices show an ongoing economic improvement and a solid-to-strong standing for the economy itself. At this point it is hard to put a finer point on it than that.

  • The EMU economic sentiment index fell to 115.3 in December from 117.6 in November. EMU-wide consumer confidence back-tracked, retailing backtracked and services backtracked. Rising month-to-month was the industrial sector index and construction. The sectors stepping back in December are those sectors that are relatively more impacted by interpersonal transaction activity an important point with the virus spreading in Europe.

    Among the 18 early-reporting EMU members in the table, 14 reported declines and only four showed index improvement in December (all small economics: Cyprus, Slovenia, Latvia, and Lithuania). That compares to seven countries reporting declines in November and eight reporting declines in October.

    The headline is the weakest since May of last year. March 2021 was the month in which the EMU sentiment index made its jump to the 100 mark, and it improved to 110 by the next month. So, the comparison to the May 2021 level is to an intermediate step up as the economy in Europe dug out from the severe covid weakness. From May 2021 onward, the index improved; October 2021 was the high reading at 118.6. During this phase, improvements were incremental. The headline EMU index has now declined from this post-covid peak for two-months running.

  • There is nothing in the headline or core evolution of Italy's inflation numbers this month that provokes any respite or reason to think that the worst from inflation is over. And on world markets, oil prices are moving higher giving no reason to look there for good news.

    As the chart shows, both the Italian CPI and the HICP measures are flaring sharply. The HICP slowed to gain just 0.4% in December after rising 0.8% month-to-month for two months in a row. The core HICP gained 0.5% in December, accelerating from a 0.3% November rise and equaling a 0.5% October gain.

    The Italian domestic index (as opposed to the EMU's HICP index) rose by only 0.2% in December, slowing from 0.9% in November and 0.7% in October. The core domestic measure rose by 0.4% in December, accelerating from 0.3% gains in each of the previous two months.

    Headline inflation leads Core inflation is running below the pace of headline inflation as oil and energy prices lead the way higher for inflation. But the two headline measures are up over three months in the range of 7% to 7.8% while the core measures are up in the range of 3.9% to 5.1%. All these rates of change are excessive with respect to the overarching 2% target on average now aimed at by ECB policy. And until recently, Italy has been one of the low inflation countries in the EMU.

    Diffusion narrows...but Digging deeper into the numbers, we can unearth some good news but I'm still not sure how deep it goes. For example, over three months, Italy's inflation diffusion is only 50% (that means inflation is rising in as many categories as it is falling); this is down sharply from a diffusion reading of 75% over six months and from 58.3% over 12 months. Of course, saying that inflation is neither accelerating nor decelerating when its three-month pace is in the 7% to 8% range is not such a great accomplishment.

    However, if we look at the median inflation gain for the 12 CPI components in the table, the annualized median for three-months is 1.5%, for six-months it is 1.2%, and for 12-months it is 0.7%. So, there is some acceleration in that pattern, but since these already are annualized rates the medians show inflation coming in under the radar. But these medians were selected on annualized gains and without regard to the size of the category so the pace for headline inflation is much stronger and has accelerated even more; the same is true for core inflation. Those facts push these metrics to a back-row seat. They still get their say, but not a very loud voice.

    Monthly trends Monthly inflation in December, November and October had a median value of 0.1% across the 12-categories (not annualized). The headline flared sharply while the core continued to cruise at a too-fast speed. In December, only transportations showed a month-to-month price decline, but education, health care and clothing & footwear prices showed flat results on the month. In November, two categories showed declines: 1) housing & furniture and 2) communication. Also, recreation & culture prices were flat. Education & communication prices fell in October with the catch-all ‘other' category flat in October. These results show that inflation is not exploding everywhere and finds some hope that when the primary stimulus for inflation lessens inflation elsewhere might dip. However, what we cannot know from these data is the extent to which people/workers feel they have lost ground in their compensation and will seek to address that in coming months possibly putting a wage-price spiral into effect and sustaining the inflation pulse.

    Sequential trends Over three months, inflation decelerated in six categories and prices fell in two categories. Over six months, inflation slowed in three categories and prices fell in two categories. Over 12 months, inflation slowed in five categories compared to 12-months ago and prices were lower year-on-year in two categories.

    Inflation in Q4 However, in the just completed quarter (see QTD column), headline inflation runs at a 6.2% to 6.5% pace with the core at 3.1% to 3.3%. The median annualized rate of change in the quarter is 1.7%. Communications and education prices are lower on balance in the quarter. Rent & utilities prices and transportation prices are both up at double-digit pace of 14% or more (annualized).

  • Both headline and manufacturing IP trends show steady growth acceleration from 12-months to six-months to three-months. One year ago, both overall IP and manufacturing IP were imploding, falling at a rate of 3.5% to 4% over the previous 12-months.

    Two months into the third quarter (quarter-to-date; QTD) trends for IP are mixed. Manufacturing IP is advancing in the QTD at a 1.7% annualized rate. However, overall IP is falling at a 1.4% annualized rate. There is still a good deal of slack in the system as overall and manufacturing IP are still some eight percentage points below their respective past cycle peaks.

    Despite the strength in the sequential growth rates taking growth back farther to just before Covid struck the global economy, overall Japanese IP is lower by 0.8% than it was in January 2020. Manufacturing output is lower by 1.4%.

    Product group trends Consumer goods, investment goods, and intermediate goods output all increased in November. Consumer and intermediate goods output both rise strongly for two months running. Output in each of the three sectors fell in September with consumer goods and intermediate goods output both down sharply in September.

    Consumer goods trends show output in an accelerating mode from 12-months to six-months to three-months. Intermediate goods show strength but stop just short of posting a sequential acceleration. Investment goods trends lag the trends of the other sectors. In the QTD only consumer goods among the manufacturing sectors show an output increase with intermediate goods and investment goods output still slipping in the evolving quarter.

    Mining and utilities both show more weakness than the manufacturing sectors. Both mining and utilities show declines in November. Mining declines over 12 months, six months and three months while utilities decline on two of those three horizons. On a QTD basis, however, both mining and utilities are rising in Q4.

    The product trends show mostly weakness compared to levels achieved in January 2020. Utilities usage is the exception as it is higher by two percentage points from that mark; investment goods output is another minor exception as output there is higher by one half of one percentage point (over 22-months…) with all other product groups showing net declines on the horizon.

    Japan's IP jumped in November, rising strongly for the second month running after logging a steep drop in September.

  • The U.S. CPI outdistances Canada's CPI. And the U.S. CPI core expansion is much faster than the Canadian core. Canada's CPIx has been decelerating in the past few months and runs at a 3.6% annual rate in November.

    However, even with favorable comparisons, the Bank of Canada that seeks to keep its inflation in a range of 1% to 3% is experiencing an overshoot. Still, the overshot is much milder than what the U.S. is experiencing – especially with regard to some of the special gauges Canada uses to vet inflation.

    Canada looks at a variety of inflation measures to get a sense of what inflation is doing. The CPI Trim has been running just above the 3% band. The CPI median has stayed just within the CPI band while the CPI Common has been below the band's midpoint, below a 2% pace- just moving up to the 2% mark this month.

    The Bank of Canada has just announced a new 5-year inflation review. It will keep its approach that will continue to embrace policy of flexibility. The BOC will continue to shoot at a 2% midpoint of a 1-3 percentage point range. The mandate is still price stability, but the BOC will continue to aim at price stability and maximum sustainable employment. So, it is not quite a dual mandate.

    About the various price metrics CPI trim filters out extreme measures in the 'tail of the distribution' so that unusual spiking prices or plunging prices do not shed an undue influence on the inflation gauge. A number of these measures are also present for inflation in the U.S. I am not fond of them because there is no guarantee that they filter out pressures equally. If inflation is accelerating, there will be more excessive and high price increases; to remove them is to change reality, not to get a better picture of the economy. Advocates of trimmed inflation measures often refer to distortions caused by natural disasters which are one more like a flare that would emerge then recede. But what if inflation produces a one-month flare followed by another and even more pressure? Should all such pressures be removed, or damped?

    The median inflation rate is calculated off weighted data in the CPI. Medians have the advantage of including all data and not being distorted by outliers on either end (either too high or too low. I like median measures better than trimmed measures.

    Canada also employs something called the CPI Common which at the moment is giving the most benign inflation results. This is achieved using a statistical process that identifies common price changes across categories.

    Canada certainly has the most varied and taxonomic approach to inflation of any G7 central bank. The problem with having in such a stable of inflation measures is that there will be several inconsistent stories told about inflation each month.

    The CPIx is an older measure no longer leaned upon by the central bank that excludes eight of the most volatile CPI components. It may not be in the policy focus of the central bank as much, but it is still closely watched.

    Other countries have less formal inflation diversity The ECB targets its HICP. The U.S. targets the PCE deflator and leans on the core when energy prices flare. There are fewer ways to be misled with so few gauges and perhaps nothing is lost by having only and indicator or two if they are good ones.

    For Canada, we can see a number of possibilities. But it seems unlikely that the central bank in this environment would think inflation really was remaining below target. In fact, two of the oldest gauges, the headline and the core probably provide about as much mix as you need with the headline still flaring under the strain of energy prices and the core having stopped rising and settled back off peak.

    Canadian inflation this month is driven by the cost of gasoline which is a common global theme. November is the eighth straight month that inflation has been above the top of the BOC's preferred range.

  • This chart includes a dozen early reporting mostly long-standing EMU members and three others for a total of fifteen. Four of the EMU 12 members show IP declines in October with one at a dead-flat reading; two of the three non-EMU member show IP declined in October. Overall, there are six declines among these fifteen early reports – 40% show output declines and 53% show output increases. It's a mixed pattern tilted to advance in the month of October. September has six output declines and one flat result. August had eight output declines and two flat output results. The recent (three-month) run of data have been mixed with a tilt to expansion at least by the number of countries. Among the four largest EMU economies (Germany, France, Italy, and Spain), there are six declines in output in the most recent 12 monthly IP changes for this group and one flat result. That leaves the large economy group with just slightly more output declines than increases (6 vs. 5).

    The sequential growth rates tell a less upbeat story. There are 10 IP declines out of 15 changes over three months. Over six months, there also are ten declines. Over 12 months, there are only four declines against eleven increases.

    Still, there are seven among these fifteen countries that show IP growth rates deteriorate steadily moving from 12-months to six-months to three-months. Only Finland shows IP growth rates accelerating on this sequence of dates. Looking only at period-to-period trends, output accelerated over three-months (compared to six-months) in about one third of the countries while over six-months (compared to 12-months) there is acceleration in 30.8%. However, over 12-months compared to 12-months ago, there is acceleration in 83.3% of the countries.

    These many ways of tracking and slicing the data to revel trends shows that strength is beginning to ebb. The year-on-year gains are solid, widespread, and confirmed by PMI results, but that strength does not carry through over shorter periods or in the various monthly habitats.

    In the very young quarter-to-date period (October's result compounded over the Q3 average), the incipient trend registers declines in seven of the fifteen countries. The two largest EMU economies show output increases while the next two largest EMU economies show declines. The median increase is an annualized 1.7% gain.

    We can also look at manufacturing PMI trends on these periods. For the EMU, over the each of the last two months, PMI weakened; but the PMI had increased in August. Over three months and six months, the EMU manufacturing has been weakening. But over 12 months, manufacturing IP is higher than it was 12-months ago. Compared to January 2020, the Markit manufacturing metric is higher in 74% in the EMU – and that looks a lot stronger than the results gleaned from actual output changes.

    In addition, we can take a longer look back to January 2020 levels of output before Covid struck. On this timeline, there are ten countries with output level that are still below their levels of January 2020. All four of the largest EMU economics have output below their respective January 2020 levels. The U.K., the second largest economy in Europe (but not an EMU or EU member), also has output lower than it was in January 2020.

    On balance, we see output trends slowing and tracing their weakness back to January 2020. We must mark this as a rather extended period with output having been broadly listless. And the sense we get of momentum trend is muted or negative. Of course, such trend assessments are less valuable with Covid circulating since it has such trend wreaking capabilities. For now, there is another wave of infections rising in Europe and in various places in the U.S. Clearly, we have poor trends in the works a rising threat to the prospect of improvement to boot.

  • German exports are up by a solid 4.1% month-over-month in October, but imports are up by a stronger 5.0%. Exports are running at around a 10% annualized pace over 12-months six-months and three-months. But imports are up at a stronger 20% pace over 12 months, they slow slightly to 17.6% over six months then accelerate to a 34% pace over three months.

  • Japan's economy watchers index is a relatively up-to-date assessment of how the economy is doing based on a survey of, well, economy watchers! The indexes for November show a small improvement in the current index and a somewhat larger step back in the expectations reading. Both readings are still strong.

    The queue standings of both the current index and the future index are extremely strong. The current index has a 99.2 percentile standing while the future index has a 90.8 percentile standing. Both indexes show that they have each been stronger than their current values less than 10% of the time since January 2002. The current index has only been stronger less than 1% of the time! That marks them as formidable readings.

    Sequential strength: the current index The table looks at changes in the variables over three months, six months and 12 months – as well as at levels monthly. The highlighting feature flashes red when the annualized change on the horizon is weaker than in the previous period. Note that for the current index red values are absent over three months; there is only one over six months and one over 12 months. This tells us that the current index has been both expanding and accelerating broadly. Various sub-indexes that are not distinct categories but rather reflect diverse ways to group and understand the data, provide more detail. Both the headline and six of the nine sub-indexes display 90th percentile standings. In addition, three categories households, eating & drinking places, and services display the strongest values in their respective histories back to January 2002. Despite this, employment, an overall reading, has as an 86.2 percentile reading that is hardly weak; but it is the second lowest standing among current index components (housing is weaker at 54.8 percentile standing- much weaker).

    The current index monthly patterns The current index has only three-monthly values that are not stronger than they were a month ago in October, these are retail, housing, and employment. In October, all components strengthened. And all components had strengthened in September as well. Despite the monthly climb in the headline, there may be some atrophy setting in.

    The future index and monthly patterns The future index has all the same data presentations as the current index. Its month-to-month trends show a broad deceleration, however, with every category including the headline, weaker in November than in October. In October four categories had weakened relative to September while September had showed increases all around. Eating & drinking and services have slowed for two months running as have the readings for all corporations and for manufacturers.

    Sequential growth: the future index While the future index shows signs of slowing in its monthly detail, that is not true for three three-month change readings. They are uniformly stronger than their (annualized) six-month change counterparts. However, over six months the future index experiences a broad slowdown with the six-month change slowing its pace compared to the 12-month change for all components except housing. Compared to its year-ago change, all metrics are higher since a year ago Japan's economy was not faring very well.

    The future index components and sub-indexes also show a lot of strength with four indexes having 90th percentile standings. However, employment has a lower, 78th percentile standing. Housing, corporations, and manufacturers have standings in their respective 60th decile range and nonmanufactures slip into the 50th percentile range for their standing. These are also firm-to-solid-to-strong readings/standings; there is nothing weak here, but the future index readings are a cut or two below what we find in the current index.

  • The ZEW Survey shows weakening current conditions, slightly weaker expectations, and a sharp drop in inflation expectations as short- and long-term interest rate expectations rise and stock market expectations improve in the United States, Germany and across the EMU.

    The economics situation has mid-range percentile standings with the U.S. and the euro area showing standings in the 60-percentile decile. Germany has a standing below its 50-percentile mark at 47.4%, placing it below its historic median. The situation eroded by 11.6 points on average this month for these three economic units.

    Economic expectation surveys are offered for the U.S. and for Germany. They both register in the 50th decile, barely above their respective medians; the expectations readings drop by a small amount on average in December with underlying data showing Germany a bit lower and the U.S. just a tick stronger month-to-month.

    Inflation expectations fell broadly in December. The average drop for the group is a decline of 19.7 diffusion index points. The standings for inflation expectations are in the low teens or lower. Inflation itself is still high in Germany, the EMU, and especially in the U.S. But inflation expectations that had jumped in February and March of this year have since cooled. After the jump high readings lingered around with net diffusion readings in the 70s for these three regions/countries for about six months, then they began to break lower in July or August. They continued to weaken and posted negative net values in November and deeper negative net diffusion readings in December. As of December, the net diffusion reading averages -34.6 compared to -14.9 in November. Inflation is broadly expected to have peaked and to be headed for lower values. These trends include the U.S. although the Fed has begun to sing a different tune of late and is prepared to accelerate the taper it only just started. Some Fed members want the taper completed earlier because they see a potential of higher rates ahead and the Fed wants all tapering to be over before it starts to hike rates. Europe and the U.S. seem to be in quite different places.

    Both short- and long- term rate expectations moved up in December and for both horizons the average increase is a modest amount. But short-term rate expectations are modest with a 58.8 percentile standing in the EMU and a 64.8 percentile standing in the U.S. But for long-term expectations, both the U.S. and German rates have standings in their respective 80th percentiles. Despite inflation expectations breaking lower, markets are expecting short rates to firm to a modest degree and for long rates to remain firm at a relatively high level. Stock markets are expected to improve, too, and they have 60th to 70th percentile standings which are pretty firm considering that inflation is high and interest rates are expected to rise with long rates settling at a relatively high level.

  • German orders soured and declined in October. The revival stage of the Covid recovery seems to have drawn to a close and left nothing in its wake in the way of momentum.

    Orders are falling at a 44.1% annual rate over three months; they are weaker than their 16% annual rate of decline over six months which in turn is weaker than their 1% drop over 12-months. Foreign orders follow that same script in terms of growth progressions with comparable magnitudes. Domestic orders also show the same sequential decay in orders. For domestic orders, the three-month pace of decline comes in at -35.9%, the six-month pace is -6.2%, but domestic orders show a small, 1.6%, increase over 12 months. It is still an eroding profile.

    In the quarter-to-date, German orders are falling at a 42% annual rate with foreign orders imploding at a 53.6% annual rate and domestic orders contracting at a 19.4% annual rate.

    Looking at where orders are in the post-Covid revival period, the results are grim. Taking January 2020 before Covid struck as a base, total orders are still lower on balance by 1.1%. foreign orders are lower by 4.5% and domestic orders are up by 4%. That's a period of 22-months and the best category is domestic orders that are up by 4% or an average gain of 0.2% per month for real orders.

    The Covid question And now there is a new development with the Omicron variant beginning to take hold. The early (too-early-to-know) take on this strain is that it is more transmissible and apparently not as deadly as, so far, it has not sent many in South Africa to the hospital. But a number of young people have caught this virus and it is not clear why that is. So, we are flying blind about the impact of this virus feeling our way day-by-day as the ‘whole world' is bracing to try to find out what it will be.

    Germany's Covid disaster Germany with a new incoming chancellor is taking a new more aggressive tact toward the existing virus as national and regional leaders have agreed to bar unvaccinated individuals from many activities in public life to force them to get vaccinated. Vaccination in Germany could be made mandatory as soon as February. Germany is experiencing a fourth wave of covid infection that is the most severe so far. And all of this is just about the existing virus and not about any risk from Omicron. Angela Merkel is taking a front role in this process backed up by the incoming chancellor, Olaf Scholz. The Berlin mayor has said that most of the cases of Covid are for unvaccinated people.

    These are the restrictions being put in place by German officials to govern activities:

    • Unvaccinated people will be limited to meetings with their own household and two other people
    • The 2G rule (this refers to people recovered from Covid in the last two months or vaccinated people) will be enforced at restaurants and cultural venues and non-essential shops
    • Clubs will shut in areas where 350 cases have been recorded per 100,000 people in the past seven days - the national rate is over 400
    • Up to 30 million vaccinations will be carried out by Christmas - first, second or boosters
    • Outdoor events, including Bundesliga football, will have limited crowds of 15,000 and 2G rules
    • Fireworks on New Year's Eve will be banned (Source here).

    Omicron perspective So far, 79 cases of the Omicron virus have been recorded in 15 European countries. Most are connected in some way with air-travel either directly or from contact with air-travelers from African countries.

    German industrial activity Real sector sales in Germany show total manufacturing and mining sales falling at a progressively steeper pace from 12-months to six-months to three-months. Most sectors follow this pattern or at least come close without a major violation to the deteriorating sequential trend process. The exception is consumer goods where sales rise at a 5.6% pace over six months accelerating from a 0.9% gait over 12 months. Capital goods follow the script with sales easing faster over three months and with six-month and 12-month sales falling at the same pace. Intermediate goods show sales decaying from a 1.7% gain over 12 months to a -6.4% pace over six months. The three-month change is a ‘speed up' to -5.4% but still is a decline and a clear deceleration from 12-months and then again not much of a speed up compared to six-months. In short, only consumer goods show a real departure from the secular decay trend and, even so, all sectors and aggregates show real sector sales falling over three months. Only nondurables show a three-month drop pace smaller than its year-on-year pace. We can clearly conclude that German activity is mired in an ongoing and worsening pace of decline. The order data suggest strongly that the slowing is still in order and in train. Germany's Covid situation and its new ‘remedy' would seem to condemn the economy to a further period of continuing its tailspin.

    The quarter-to-date (QTD) data for sector sales do show a bit more in terms of signs of life. The overall sales pictures for sales in manufacturing as a whole, sales of capital goods, and sales of intermediate goods all show incipient quarter-to-date sales increases. The QTD declines are all sequestered in the consumer goods sector- overall sales, sales of nondurable goods and sales of durable goods.

    However, assessing sector sales vs. their January 2020 levels finds declines in every single sector and in all aggregate measures.

    Germany and the EMU Big Four economy trends The bottom of the table features the EU industrial assessment from the EU Commission. On that metric, October finds France, Italy, and Spain stronger month-to-month with Germany weaker. Three-month averages of the EU data show ongoing industrial improvement for all countries on that sequence – a difference from the trends in German real orders and sector sales. However, in the EU data for all four countries, there is lessening improvement over three months compared to the early performances. France and Italy each improve over three months by just a tenth of a tick on their average comparisons. Germany is stronger than that on its three-monthly average gain but still slows compared to its large six-month improvement vs. its 12-month level. The queue standing data that compare each of the four countries' current metrics to their history of data back to 1990 find the best strength in Germany with a 98.9 percentile queue standing, followed by Spain at 97.9 percentile, Italy at its 94.7 percentile, and France at its 90.4 percentile. Comparisons of changes from January 2020 levels show the strongest gains are from Germany followed by Italy, Spain, and then France in that order.