Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics

Introducing

Robert Brusca

Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media.   Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.

Publications by Robert Brusca

  • United Kingdom
    | Mar 23 2022

    U.K. CPIH Flares...But Slows

    Inflation in the U.K. continues to run hot in February. The headline gauge CPIH rose 0.5% in February, the same as in January and in December. Sequential inflation rates for the U.K. show a 5.5% annual rate over 12 months, a 6.5% annual rate over six months, and a 6.2% annual rate over three months. Inflation shows signs of having peaked. These are early signs, preliminary, tentative signs, not irreversible, but encouraging.

    Core Inflation- a more complicated pattern The core measure, which is the CPIH excluding energy, food, alcohol beverages & tobacco, decelerated in February rising by 0.4% after gaining 0.6% in January and 0.3% in December. This core measure is up at a 4.5% pace over 12 months; it accelerates to 5.2% over six months; it edges higher to a 5.4% pace over three months. However, a plot of the three-month inflation rates for the core shows that inflation ticked off its highest pace of this cycle slowing in February compared to January (5.8% in January). However, that's only a one-month to deceleration, certainly not definitive.

    Inflation fighting complications from the virus ...again The Bank of England has begun to move to fight inflation. Like other central banks, it's concerned that inflation is high and has spread. However, the U.K., like much of Europe right now, is undergoing a resurgence of the virus. This new variant is very highly transmissible; it strikes Europe when countries in Europe are taking off their restraints. WHO claims that the constraints are being taken off too rapidly; it even uses the word ‘brutally’ to describe the policy of relaxation. Still, it's hard to tell why the spread has picked up. Restrictions were lifted and the new variant is much more transmissible-so what is responsible? A number of European countries, especially Germany, right now are undergoing sharp increases in their infection rates. This may be something that monetary policy is going to have to take account of even in the face of other challenges.

    Breadth of inflation and its rise monthly Among the 10 U.K. CPI categories in February, half of them show acceleration in inflation month-to-month compared to January. In January, five categories out of ten also had showed month-to-month acceleration. The proportion of acceleration in January and February was lower than in December when seven categories showed acceleration month-to-month. However, with five categories accelerating out of 10 monthly, the breadth of inflation is meeting some resistance to spreading.

    Sequential trends Turning to sequential growth rates, over three months only five categories show acceleration compared to six over six months. Over 12 months nine categories accelerated compared to 12-months ago. Over six months the breadth is still substantial with only a few categories resisting acceleration. It is not surprisingly that the 12-month inflation rate is substantially and widely higher across all commodity categories compared to 12-months ago. But over three months the mix of accelerating and decelerating is at the point of neutrality: five accelerate and five decelerate.

    The outlook The challenge for the future is going to involve dealing with this inflation spike, with higher global commodity prices, with rising oil prices, with the distortions caused by the war in Ukraine, with various sanctions NATO members and others have adopted, with ongoing problems from the virus, and with supply chain issues. The challenges really are many. For the time being, there is some good news with the three-month inflation rate edging down to 6.2% and the three-month core inflation rate off peak at 5.4% and with it barely having accelerated from six-months ago. But very clearly, inflation still is entrenched. The monthly increase at 0.5% for the headline and 0.4% for the core is too high. The risks for inflation are still substantial and monetary policy has a lot of different situations to juggle in order to solve the inflation riddle and to keep growth on track.

  • The U.K. CBI survey for March 2020 shows orders moving up to a net diffusion reading (up minus down) of 26 from 20 in February. That compares to a net of 24 in January. The January reading is above the three-month, six-month, and 12-month averages. It's a strong reading for orders and it shows that manufacturing in the U.K. is still carrying forward momentum. Export orders swung sharply higher in March moving to +7 from -7 in February. All the averages for prior periods, for three-months, six-months, and 12-months are negative values making the +7 reading for orders in March an extremely strong reading by recent standards. Stocks of finished goods improved to -8 in March from -14 in February; they too are stronger in March than they are over three-month, six-month and 12-month averages. Negative readings on stocks are quite common. Despite the pick-up in March, the index is still at a very weak level. For total orders, the queue standing is in the 99.7% (its highest reading on this timeline since 1991). Orders have never been higher than they are in March. Export orders have a 92.3 percentile standing, also very strong. For inventories of finished goods, however, despite their improvement, there is a 2.5 percentage point standing. That means the reading for stocks has been weaker only about 2.5% of the time, marking March as an extremely low reading, despite its recent strength. In the U.K., firms continue to have a hard time building inventory. While the outlook for orders and export orders is solid and strong, firms are having a difficult time getting ahead of demand because of supply constraints and other problems.

    Other industrial measures While the industrial production measure lags and it's only up to date through January, industrial production has been generally accelerating. It’s up at 3.7% over 12 months, it's up at a 2.3% pace over six months, and then it accelerates, rising at a 7.2% pace over the last three months. Industrial production in manufacturing continues to show some solid strength. Also, the PMI measure from Markit for the U.K. continues to float at a high level between 55 and 60. Its standing for February is at its 84th percentile; that's a relatively strong reading for U.K. manufacturing.

    Outlook for volume and prices The outlook for volume of output over the next three months ticked slightly lower in March, turning in a reading of 30 from February’s 31. However, the reading of 30 is still affirmed as a strong reading; it's above the three-month average of 28 and the six-month average of 29 and just below the 12-month average of 31. The percentile standing of this reading of 30 has a 95.1 queue percentile standing. Even though the March reading is only at this 12-month average, it's at what is historically a very strong reading for expected output. Average prices have moved up strongly in March to a reading of 80 from 77 in February and 66 in January. Here are the averages are quite telling: the 12-month average for prices three months ahead has a net rating of 54, that steps up to 69 over six months and steps up again to 74 over three months. Expectations for inflation continue to leapfrog. The March percentile standing for prices at 80 is in the 99.7 percentile mark. This is the highest reading for expected prices since at least 1991.

  • German inflation rose sharply in February, gaining 1.4% after rising 1.9% in January and 5.1% in December. These are increases month-to-month for the German ‘headline PPI,' the PPI excluding construction; they are exceptionally large month-to-month gains. The German PPI excluding energy rose by 1% in February following a 2.2% gain in January and a 0.6% gain in December. The heat is on…

    Sequential prices growth Over three months the headline PPI series is up at a 38.8% annual rate; over six months it's up at a 35.8% annual rate; over 12 months it rises at a 25.9% annual rate. These statistics show a slight acceleration for inflation with inflation running at an extremely rapid pace. Inflation data continue to be quite unsettling. For the PPI excluding energy, inflation is up at a 16.5% annual rate over three months; that's an acceleration from 12.5% over six months and a nearly identical 12.4% rise over 12 months. The inflation measure excluding energy is also extremely high and indicates that inflation is entrenched quite beyond the impact of energy on headline inflation.

    Quarter-to-date PPI In the quarter-to-date, the PPI headlines series is running at a 34.3% annual rate of increase at this point; that reflects the January plus February PPI indexes divided by the fourth quarter index average annualized. Calculated the same way, the German PPI excluding energy is up to 17.3% annual rate. Both are quite strong gains and certainly out of the tolerance range for the central bank. They contribute to the view that inflation not only remains problematic but that the problem is worsening.

    Compared to the CPI However, the European Central Bank looks at consumer price inflation, particularly at its HICP measure. In Table Germany's PPI, we have chronicled the behavior of the German domestic CPI as a point of reference. The CPI shows much smaller increases than the PPI but still strong increases and a demonstration of acceleration. The headline CPI is up at a 7.4% annual rate over three months; that accelerates from 6.7% over six months and that's up from 5.2% over 12 months. The German CPI excluding energy is up to a 3.7% annual rate over three months, compared to 3.5% over six months and a 3.2% pace over 12 months. Again, these are excessive rates of inflation compared to a target of 2% by the ECB for overall EMU inflation.

    Quarter-to-date CPI The CPI gains are not as outlandishly strong as the PPI inflation figures show. But in the quarter-to-date, inflation is unfolding rapidly; the CPI is up at 8.5% annual rate and the CPI ex-energy is up at a 4.3% annual rate. Inflation continues to accelerate and to be stubborn at extremely high rates of inflation.

  • After logging a long string of current account surpluses, the countries of the European Monetary Union (EMU) have now posted three deficits in a row for consecutive months. The turnaround is on the back of sharply increased imports which reflect increased imports of nonmanufactured goods. Commodity prices have increased sharply, and this has driven up the deficit for nonmanufacturers across the EMU.

    The balance of trade on manufactured goods posted a surplus of €29.1 billion in the 12-month period ended 12-months ago. In the current 12-month period the surplus is €28.3 billion, a slightly smaller amount, but not much changed. Yet, for nonmanufactured goods, the 12-month average for 12 months ago was a deficit of €8.8 billion; that figure has ballooned to €21 billion on average over the last 12 months and has escalated to €30.4 billion in deficit on average over three months and progressed further to a deficit of €33.2 billion in January alone. All those figures are expressed at annual rates.

    The point is that manufacturing in Europe seems to have held up well; however, it has not been able to keep pace with the sharp increase in nominal nonmanufacturing goods and a deficit has been created as a result. This is a deficit caused by the increased importation of nonmanufactured goods and substantially a deficit caused by the increase in the prices of nonmanufactured goods.

    Looking at percentage changes, manufactured goods imports are up by 26.4% over 12 months but nonmanufactured goods imports are up by 82.6% over 12 months. For exports, manufactured exports are up by 12.8% over 12 months while nonmanufactured exports are up 30.5% over 12 months. Clearly the trade action has been concentrated in around nonmanufactured goods, not in manufactured goods. But manufactured goods have nonetheless held their ground.

    Looking at the results for individual countries in Europe, Germany shows consistently faster import growth than export growth over 12 months, over six months and over three months. France shows an uneven picture with exports and imports trading places as far as which flow is expanding more rapidly. Over 12 months French exports grow faster than French imports and that trend holds up over three months as well, although it is reversed in each of the last two months. The U.K. has stronger imports than exports with imports up 23.5% over 12 months and exports up by just 11.4% on that timeline; exports are up at a 6.1% annual rate over three months with imports up at a 28.2% annual rate over three months.

  • Inflation in the European Monetary Union (EMU) rose by 0.7% in February after rising by 1.1% in January. The core measure for inflation (excluding food and energy) in February rose by just 0.1%; that was after rising by 0.7% in January. Sequential growth rates that measure inflation over 12 months, six months and three months show inflation has been building momentum for the headline inflation rate which expanded by 5.8% over 12 months, at a 7.9% annual rate over six months and at an 8.9% annual rate over three months.

    The core rate of Inflation breaks this string of acceleration but only technically. The 12-month core gain is at 2.6%; that rises to a 3.9% annual rate over six months and that in turn backs off very slightly to log a technically smaller gain at a pace of 3.8% over three months. Essentially inflation has gone from being excessive over 12 months to being much more excessive over three months and six months according to each of these measures.

    The ECB is well away from its target of hitting 2% inflation although as we're going to see in the averages for inflation how much better-behaved much of this inflation phenomenon is when averaged. Inflation has really welled up relatively recently although it's quite excessive and now it still has momentum.

    Moreover, inflation is gaining momentum and from different sources. Oil prices are still extremely high in February. But Brent oil prices measured in euros fell 28.2% in February after rising by 14% in January. Oil prices remain high and the impact on inflation is still something to worry about because in global markets oil continues to hover at very high levels. Also, Europe has an economic 'IV' line for energy that is piped in from Russia making it dependent on the very country on which they have slapped aggressive economic sanctions. And to follow that thought… since Russia is walled off from global markets by sanctions, at some point it may find oil revenues as not as valuable as cutting off the oil flow and inflicting economic pain on Europe.

    In several ways the war in Ukraine is a factor...

    Before the war welled up, there were supply chain problems created by the pandemic (remember the pandemic?) and these supply chain issues were affecting prices globally, creating shortages, creating price pressures, and that now is made worse by having a war in Ukraine and having these countervailing sanctions placed on Russia.

    Russia is rich in natural resources and with the West putting sanctions on Russia, Russian commodities are going to be unavailable to the world and this is going to be reflected in higher commodity prices. The invasion of Ukraine is taking Ukraine off the map as an international trading partner and that of course is going to hit the food market and wheat market particularly hard as well as the market for selected natural resources. The implication here is that inflation is high, inflation has momentum, and inflation has some new sources that are going to make it worse before things get better.

  • Italy's inflation rate remains high and continues to show acceleration in February. The inflation gauge as measured by the HICP shows Italian prices up 1.3% in February, slightly less than the 1.5% they grew in January, but still a very high increase month-to-month. The HICP core gain was 0.9% in February, up from 0.5% in January. Italy’s domestic inflation measures continue to show heat as well.

    Inflation accelerates broadly The sequential inflation rates for Italy show the headline rate going from a 6.1% pace over 12 months to a 9.5% annual rate over six months to a 13.8% annual rate over three months. For the core rate, that progression is 1.8% over 12 months, 4.1% over six months and 6.3% over three months. Both headline and core measures of inflation show acceleration. Prices remain hot monthly across the board. Not only is Italian inflation high and accelerating but the diffusion characteristics of inflation reinforce the notion that inflation is accelerating and broad. The diffusion index for three-month inflation is at 75%, for six-months it's at 75% and for 12 months it's at 58.3%. A diffusion reading at 50% implies that inflation acceleration and deceleration for the period are balanced across various CPI line-items. At 75%, the diffusion index is showing inflation is greatly tilted toward acceleration and we see that condition over three months and six months as well as a sizable tilt toward more inflation acceleration over 12 months.

    Monthly trends Looking at monthly data the inflation rate across the various domestic components, we find it increased in all but two of them in February- that's an acceleration in all but two out of 12 components. Similarly, inflation increased month-to-month in January for all components except 2 and the same was true in December. The monthly data reinforce what we see in the sequential data: they show that inflation is accelerating period-to-period whether it's 12-months to six-months to three-months or December to January to February.

    Quarter-to-date On a quarter-to-date basis- this is with two months of data in for the first quarter- inflation is rising at a 13.6% annual rate for the headline HICP and at a 5.4% annual rate for the core. The domestic measure shows headline inflation at an 11.5% pace with the core at a 3% pace. The domestic measures are slightly less hot than the HICP measures employed by the ECB.

    Despite the high inflation levels in Italy, Italian inflation has generally been tracking below German inflation in recent years. Italy went through a period of austerity and was able to gain control of its inflation rate. But now inflation seems to permeate the economy and Italy has a clear inflation fight on its hands. Increases in global energy costs are going to continue to weigh on Italy, a country that is dependent on imported energy. The ECB will be raising interest rates to try to fight off these inflation effects as the year goes on, but inflation in Italy appears to be high, entrenched, and broad so the economy is going to have a lot of work ahead of it to put this inflation back down inside parameters that are acceptable from an EMU-wide targeting standpoint of around 2%.

  • The ZEW economic index for Germany fell more sharply in March than it ever had previously in its history. The German macroeconomic expectations index for March logged a -39.3 value after posting 54.3 in February; that change produces a net decline in the index of 93.6 points for the month. The U.S. expectations index also weakened, from 13.1 in February to -26.1 in March, a lesser but serious step-back.

    Germany is reeling under the sanctions that it imposed on Russia in combination with the war in Ukraine on its doorstep. These two events have shattered expectations and caused current conditions to weaken sharply. In Germany, the current conditions index which was -8.1 in February has backtracked to -21.4 in March; this compares to a U.S. current conditions index that was 46.2 in February and has backtracked to 31.7 in March. Clearly concerns about the war and conditions in Europe have hit the German economy much harder than the U.S. economy.

    At the same time, inflation expectations have moved sharply higher in March. For the euro area, the reading was -35.1 in February, rising to 69.5 in March. The German index in February was at -37.5; that's moved sharply higher to plus 70.2 in March. In the U.S., the index moved from -36.2 in February to plus 50.6 in March. The war came and the sanctions have been imposed and these are turning the entire economic picture inside out and upside down. The ZEW index shows a combination of dramatic and benign changes.

    Markets continue to trade- did they simply discount everything? We usually expect markets to be the litmus test of economic events. But strangely the impact on markets according to the ZEW experts has been muted - in the survey at least. Euro area short-term interest rate expectations were at 50.3 for February and they have eroded only slightly to 47.2 in March. For the U.S., short-term rate expectations of 88.7 in February have become 86.7 in March.

    The impact on long-term rates sees the German index going from 74.2 in February to 76.5 in March whereas the U.S. index moves from 78.0 in February to 81.5 in March.

    Stock market survey shows reduced expectations but not dramatically so. In the euro area the stock market expectation index moves from a survey value of 32.9 in February to 22.1 in March; in Germany it drops from 34.8 in February to 21.4 in March; in the U.S. it barely budges moving from 28.5 in February to 27.3 in March. Of course, the stock market standings all are weak.

    Summary Table: Stronger vs. Weaker The summary table show the economic situation weakening in the euro area, Germany, and the U.S. in March. Economic expectations weaken in Germany and the U.S. in March. Inflation expectations rise across the board for the euro area, Germany, and the U.S. Short-term rate expectations are slightly weaker in the euro area and the U.S. while long rate expectations are slightly stronger. For stocks, assessments are slightly weaker but not very dramatically. The survey shows dramatic shifts in economic variables and slight wiggles in market gauges.

  • The Bank of France business indicator rose to 107.1 in February from 106.6 in January. The index stands above its 12-month average which is at 104.4 and resides above its long-term average since August 1990 by a considerable amount. The indicator has a percentile standing on that timeline at its 82.6 percentile, a relatively strong standing for this indicator. Compared to just before the COVID emergency struck, the survey indicator is up by 10.4 points indicating a reasonably robust rebound during this two-year period.

    Survey standings The components of the survey are a somewhat mixed lot. The strongest parts of the survey are for employment, both employment as expected and the employment change versus last month. Both of those line items have standings in their 90th percentile, in fact, in the upper part of their 90th percentile deciles. These are the indicators that are most responsible for giving the headline such strong standing. Apart from that, the order book standing is also relatively firm, at 89.2 percentile with the standing for foreign orders at 69.9% and for the change in total new orders at 72.8%. All of these indicators are somewhere between firm-to-strong. On the weaker side are inventories that have only 59.1% standing; still above their historic median although inventories are the only variable showing a net lower standing currently than they had in February 2020 before the virus struck. Capacity usage is also weak – indicating that a lot of slack remains in the system.

    Trouble in paradise? Somewhat troubling is the response ranking for expected production. Expected production has only a 24.8 percentile standing, and it only increased by 5.6 points compared to February 2020. At a 24.8 percentile standing, expected production is well below its historic median indicating some trouble with the outlook on the part of producers. However, that standing flies in the face of such a strong standing for expected employment. So, there are things in this survey that raise eyebrows and may raise some concerns. However, for the moment, the survey doesn't seem to have any consistencies in it that cause us to think that it is seriously deteriorating.

    Month-to-month and recent trends Turning to the month-to-month changes, the output change variable fell to 14.1 in February from 24.6 in January and that's also a decline from its December level. Expected production has been struggling ever since COVID struck.

    Overall, there are nine components and the headline. Of the nine components, six weakened in February. Six have weakened on balance over three months and five have weakened over six months.

    While output change has a solid historic standing, it has in fact struggled showing declines in four of the last six months and a net decline on balance. Expected production has weakened in February and is weaker on balance over three months but is stronger over six months.

    Despite weakening in February, order books show declines in only two of six months and mark solid-to-strong increases over both three-months and six-months. Changes in orders are weaker than the volume of orders on the books as both foreign order and total order changes are weaker in three of the last six months and both series are weaker on balance over three months and six months on balance.

    The change in finished inventories logs a negative value in February, but it improves from November. The series chronically logs negative values. Its current reading is a touch better than its 12-month average and above its historic median. Capacity use has weakened in four of the last six months and is lower on balance over three months and six months.

    Both employment gauges weakened in February from their January level. Both have very strong high 90th percentile standings. The change in employment month-to-month was positive for four months in a row before declining in February. However, expected employment is lower in two of the last three months.

    Outlook and risks On balance, the French survey looks sturdy enough. As often is the case with these surveys, the jobs components stay the strongest the longest. But there is some encroaching weakness for output and more outright weakness for expected production. There is still some lingering risk of an unknown dimension for COVID to return. Related to that, there are global supply chain problems. But the new risk is the War in Ukraine. Inflation is high and stubborn in Europe and higher and more stubborn in the U.S. The war is feeding inflation by pumping up oil and commodity prices. Central banks have work to do and yet the solidity of the economy is not assured and central banks for the most part have not even ‘begun to fight.’ What will happen when they do?

  • German inflation rose by 0.4% in February after rising by 1.5% in January. The core rate fell by 0.3% in February after rising by 0.6% in January. Sequential growth rates show that the HICP measure of inflation for Germany rose at a 5.5% annual rate over 12 months, accelerated to a 7.8% rate over six months but cooled its pace to 7.4% over three months. Similarly, core inflation rose by 3.1% over 12 months, at a 4.1% annual rate over six months, then fell back to a 1.8% pace over three months. The bad news, of course, is that inflation in Germany remains exceptionally high; 5.5% is an extremely high headline inflation rate. The core pace of 3.1% is well above the 2% goal for inflation for the entire of the EMU area set by the European Central Bank. However, inflation in Germany is decelerating! It decelerated from six-months to three-months for the headline; for the core the deceleration is substantial and significant.

    ...and the details are devilishly good In addition to deceleration in the HICP, diffusion calculations show that the increases for inflation by category are actually not prevalent. However, over 12 months inflation is high, virulent, and broad-based. The 12-month inflation rate, which is at a 5.5% pace for the HICP headline, is 5.2% for the German domestic CPI. It registers a 72.7% diffusion reading. That's an extremely high reading, but that's for the year-over-year pace compared to the pace of one-year ago.

    If we look at a six-month horizon, inflation rate accelerates to 7.8% from 5.5% in the HICP while the domestic gauge accelerates to 6.7% from 5.2% inflation. But over six months diffusion drops to 36.4%. This is significant. Below 50% diffusion is telling us that inflation is not very widespread. In fact, it's telling us that falling inflation is a more common characteristic than rising inflation. At 36.4%, diffusion for German inflation has already cooled broadly compared to 12-months despite the increase in the headline rate. Of course, what that means is that inflation is being carried ahead by just a few categories pushing the headline up aggressively even though that kind of inflation experience does not line up across most categories.

    The three-month HICP headline shows deceleration to a 7.4% pace from 7.8%. For the German domestic inflation rate, however, there is an acceleration to a 7.4% pace from a 6.7% pace. The domestic CPI excluding energy accelerates to 3.7% from 3.5%. The domestic ex-energy acceleration is a small one, but it's different from the HICP core which showed a significant decline to a pace of 1.8%. However, when we look at the details of diffusion, we find once again that the diffusion for inflation over three months compared to six months there's only a 36.4% diffusion marker. Inflation does not accelerate broadly over three months compared to six months either.

    The behavior of inflation overall depends in some sense which of these gauges you want to look at. Over three months, it's decelerating for headline inflation and accelerating for the domestic measurement; it's decelerating for core HICP or it's accelerating for the CPI excluding energy. So, what you see for German inflation depends a lot on the actual metric you want to use to measure it. However, if you look down the line at various components of the CPI report, you find that inflation is not accelerating very many places. And in most places, there is a decelerating pace over three months and over six months. That is an important consistency.

    Oil It's also interesting that this is happening in Germany as Brent oil prices continue to push higher. In February Brent was 9.6% higher than in January; January was 14% higher than in December; the December Brent price did back off by 6.3%. If we look at the sequential growth rates, over 12 months Brent is up at a 61% annual rate, over six months it's up at a 91.5% annual rate, and over three months it's up at an 88.1% annual rate. Yet, the inflation metrics do not show that inflation is permeating the German economy.

  • Irish inflation gained 0.3% on its HICP measure in February; that's down from 0.4% in January and level with December’s 0.4% gain. Year-over-year Irish inflation is running 5.7% and increases to a 6.7% annual rate over six months but falls back to a 4.2% annual rate over three months. Ireland's domestic CPI measure tracks the results for the HICP monthly; the sequential trend is also very similar to what the HICP posts over 12 months, six months and three months. On balance, Irish inflation appears to have stopped accelerating, but it isn't clear whether this is a pause or whether there's more to come.

    The domestic CPI measure has a core rate available. The core rate for Ireland shows a 3.7% gain over 12 months, a 3.3% annualized gain over six months, and that pace ticks up to 3.5% over three months. For Ireland, the core inflation performance is relatively flat and there is a hint that inflation may be stable in the neighborhood of 3.5% (still well above the ECB’s 2% objective for inflation in the EMU area). However, it's still hard to tell and certainly hard to tell with so much pressure still present in the headline and with global oil prices and commodity prices showing so much pressure and volatility themselves. On a quarter-to-date basis, the HICP for Ireland is up at a 4.8% annual rate (that's two months into the quarter). The domestic CPI measure is up at a 4.7% annual rate QTD, nearly the same as for the HICP. However, the core CPI is up at only a 1.7% annual rate in the unfolding quarter which is not only mild but it's within the overall target band sought by the European Central Bank. Can things really be that good this soon?

    Is the Irish CPI smiling? The domestic Irish CPI shows 11 major components for inflation; these show the annual inflation rate is up with a breadth of 66.7%. That kind of diffusion (approximately acceleration in two-thirds of the CPI categories) is quite high and disturbing. Over six months, the diffusion ranking falls back to 58.3%, still showing acceleration with uncomfortable breadth. However, over three months, the diffusion measures steps back to 41.7% to accompany its milder pace. That's below the 50% mark and 50% is the dividing line between inflation accelerating or decelerating. Over three months, inflation is decelerating in more categories than it's accelerating and for Ireland this is a potentially significant result and potentially a signal that inflation it's not pausing before accelerating but is pausing because it's not going to be accelerating.

    Extreme price moves over three months Still, there's still plenty of inflation in Ireland and a lot of categories that are quite troublesome. For example, prices for alcohol are increasing at a 27.8% pace over three months. Rent and utilities as an aggregate category shows inflation up at a 9.9% annual rate over three months. The recreation and culture category shows inflation at a 5.6% annual rate over three months; food prices are up at a 6.8% annual rate over three months. Balancing those clear excessive gains are communication where prices are declining at a 3.9% annual rate, education where prices are falling at a 3.7% annual rate, and the catch-all ‘other’ category where prices are declining at a 4% annual rate.

  • Italy
    | Mar 09 2022

    Italian IP Sinks in January

    Italian industrial production for manufacturing (IP) fell by 3.4% in January. This is the second decline in a row for manufacturing industrial production. In December, IP had fallen by 1.1%. All major sectors’ industrial output fell in January. Consumer goods output fell by 3.6% month-to-month, capital goods output fell by 1.6%, and intermediate goods output fell by 3.4%. None of these sectors showed increases in December either. However, in December, consumer goods output was flat while capital goods output fell by 2.2% and intermediate goods output fell by 0.6%.

    With this sort of weakness over the last two months, it's not surprising that over three months industrial output is declining in double digits. In fact, looking back over the last 12 months, six months and three months, manufacturing industrial production in Italy falls on all those horizons and its decline gets increasingly large over shorter periods. Over 12 months Italian manufacturing industrial production falls by 2.4%, over six months it falls at an 8.3% annual rate, and over three months it falls at an 11.6% annual rate. Italy’s industrial sector is struggling.

    Sectors and sequential weakness Looking at Italian output by sector, consumer goods, capital goods and intermediate goods, there is decelerating output in just about all three sectors. All three sectors showed declines in output over three months, six months and 12 months. The declines are at progressively greater rates of shrinkage in all cases with the exception of capital goods. That exception is only a technical exception as the pace of output decline registers a -7.7% pace over six months; that improves to -7.1% over three months, a small ‘technical’ improvement but still a very large negative rate of decline. Capital goods really aren't an exception to the rule of deceleration and growing weakness across all the sectors when you really look at it broadly.

    Quarter -to-date weakness In the quarter-to-date, manufacturing output is declining at a 20% annual rate. For consumer goods, the decline is at a 20.2% annual rate. For capital goods, the decline is at a 13.5% annual rate and for intermediate goods, it's at a 19.7% annual rate. There are double-digit rates of declines overall and for all sectors. That indicates considerable outright weakness on the part of the Italian manufacturing sector. It's no wonder Italy is fighting to try to maintain energy imports during this time that many countries are pushing for an embargo on energy from Russia. The Italian economy relies on Russian energy, and given the state it's in, it's hard to imagine what sort of shape it would be in if Italy’s energy shipments were suddenly cut off.

    Italian manufacturing since COVID struck Looking at Italian industrial production and its recovery since COVID struck, all sectors show a lower level of activity than they had in January 2020. Overall manufacturing is 4.2 percentage points lower, the output of consumer goods is 6.6 percentage points lower, the output of capital goods is 3.9 percentage point lower, and the output of intermediate goods is 1.1 percentage points lower.

    Percentile rankings of Italian growth rates Evaluating the 12-month growth rates for all sectors, we find the overall standing for Italy is in its 27th percentile. This means that the growth rate has been weaker only about 27% of the time since 2000. The consumer goods sector has a 49.6-percentile standing; that's very close to its median and is the best showing of any of the sectors. The capital goods sector has a 30.7-percentile standing and intermediate goods have a 21.6-percentile standing.

    Industrial indicators for Italy are much more upbeat Going beyond the industrial production data, we can look at various indicators for the Italian industrial sector. The EU industrial indicator for Italy, in fact, has a 94.3% outstanding based upon the level of its index value. The statistical agency Istat sees current orders for Italian economy at a 98.9-percentile standing indicating a very high level of orders. The Istat outlook for production is at a 77.6-percentile standing. These surveys of Italian activity are really quite different from what we see when we look at actual industrial production and look at the increases that Italian factories are experiencing on the ground. Clearly, people answering the surveys are somewhat more optimistic when they look at and evaluate the state of conditions or when they form their expectations for the future. It's also true when we look at these indicators that all of the indicator evaluations are made based on levels of the indicators not on their growth rates. But if we were to evaluate the indicators based on year-over-year changes, they would be quite strong as well.

    Since COVID struck Compared to their levels in January 2020 since the COVID, all of the indicators have improved. However, if we look at the indicators in the current quarter-to-date, all of them are showing weakness. The EU industrial confidence indicator is down by nearly one point, the Istat current orders index is down by about 3/4 of a point, while the Istat outlook index for production is down by 1.7 points.

    Summing up Survey data are much more upbeat in the assessment of the Italian economy when compared to the industrial output. Output shows that, in real time, on-the-ground conditions are poor and they've been bad for quite some time. There's a deceleration in progress and it is deceleration of some significant magnitude. The chart that compares Italian PMI index for manufacturing to industrial production index shows that once again the PMI index for manufacturing is much stronger than the output index and is still above the level of 50 pointing to manufacturing expansion. But in the survey, we see that the PMI is in a declining trend.

  • Japan's economy watchers index in February tipped slightly lower to 37.7 from January's 37.9; this small backtracking compares to a reading of 57.5 in December. Clearly the economy watchers index in the year 2022 has the economy on much weaker footing than it had been at the end of 2021.

    The facts: Over the last three months the economy watchers index is down by 19.1 points; over six months it's up by 2.8 points; over 12 months it's down by four points.

    Over the past year the economy watchers index has barely changed and has not been very volatile. It is slightly stronger over six months; it's slightly weaker over 12 months. The queue standing of the index in February is at its 13.4 percentile, a level that marks it as being weaker since 2002 only about 13% of the time. The economy watchers index tells us that Japan's economy continues to struggle as of February.

    Current component trends These general points about the economy watchers index permeate the various components which show, for the most part, (1) small changes from January to February and (2) significantly weaker levels in January compared to December plus (3) declines by all components over three months coupled with (4) very small changes over six months, and for the most part, (5) most small declines over 12 months. These generalities are the ‘rule' up and down the line of this survey. The main exception to these rules is that over 12 months there's a more significant weakening for eating & drinking places and that industry depends upon improved conditions on the virus front in order it to be back on its feet.

    Current component levels All the queue standing components of the current index are below the 50-percentile level. That's significant because the 50th percentile on the queue standing represents the location of the median for each series. So that each series is performing at a below median level of performance. The best performing of these components on a relative basis is the employment reading which is at its 45.6 percentile standing: the next best after that it's for manufacturing establishments at the 31st percentile standing. The worst performing component, eating & drinking places, had its 4.2% standing followed by services overall at a 9.6% standing. Pretty clearly Japan's economy's struggle is broad-based. Fortunately, employment is the least affected among the components surveyed in the table. The employment reading is below its median, but not by much and its relative strength (compared to other readings) provides stability for the economy because employment supports wages and income creation and thereby spending.

    The future index The economy watches future index moved up slightly to 44.4 in February from 42.5 in January; these two readings are somewhat below their December level of 50.3. The future index improved slightly month-to-month and January while the January-February pair are weaker than December by 6-8 points. That is significant, but it is much less that the 20-point drop off for the current index. The future index also shows three month declines across all its components as did they current index. Over six months the future index is mixed but little changed. The future index, like the current index, is moderately lower over 12 months. The percentile standing of the future index is at the 28th percentile overall; across components it ranges from a low of the 20th percentile for nonmanufacturing firms to a high of 34.7 percentile for employment assessments. Like the current index, the relatively strongest reading is for employment in the future index. However, the percentile standing is lower in the future index.