Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics
Global| Dec 16 2011

French MFG Gauge Sinks...Zonal Cooperation Moves to Co-optation and Risk

Summary

The Euro-Area is under pressure; France’s AAA rating is being assailed. But the French economy is also under a real grind to lower growth. Euro-Area members are simply in a very tight, pressured, uncomfortable place with little in the [...]


The Euro-Area is under pressure; France’s AAA rating is being assailed. But the French economy is also under a real grind to lower growth. Euro-Area members are simply in a very tight, pressured, uncomfortable place with little in the way of remedy in train. Are they waiting for real change or for Godot?

France’s MFG survey from INSEE saw its industrial trend index fall to a level of -37 in December from -35 in November. That reading ranks as the 230th lowest out of 264 observations back to January of 1990, leaving it in the bottom quarter of its historic queue of values. The production trend is the weakest of the surveyed components this month.

The strongest reading being made by ranking among the survey components is inventories which are at their 91st rank out of 264 leaving that gauge in the top 25% of its range…That might sound good, except that the inventory metric implies that inventories are ‘high’ while the production trend is weak so that this ‘strong’ inventory ranking is actually reinforcing the weak production trend.

The ‘recent ’and ‘likely’ production-trend measures also are weak with each residing in the bottom 30% of their respective historic queues. Orders and Foreign orders lie in the bottom 30th to 40th percentiles of their respective queues, still weak but not as distressed as for the production trend measures.

On balance France is seeing a lot of weakness creep into its MFG sector. The development is still relatively new. The trends were rising and were at a position of +21 in the first quarter of this year, just eight months ago. But then the bottom fell out. The graphs show that the pace of the fall off since Q1 is just about as rapid as it was in the financial crisis that threw the global economy into recession.

However, the depth of the drop of the French MFG gauge has not been nearly as far in late 2011 as in 2008, at least not yet. And there is some evidence that the pace of decline is letting up. In August, the index for production trend fell to -13 from +3. Then in September it took a bigger step lower to -30 from -13. But it stayed at -30 in Oct and slipped to just -35 in November and to -37 in December. Since April the monthly drop has averaged over seven points per month; since September it has averaged less than three points per month.

Still erosion continues and the Zone has not fixed its problems. This is not lingering weakness it is enduring weakness. Credit downgrades are in the cards for France and for others; the Eurozone banking system is still entangled and trying to freeze its exposures as uncertainty about the future course of action weighs heavy and everyone seems to fear exposure to everyone else, with just a few exceptions.

The zone’s remedies have not gone far enough; there is complete agreement on that. Where they go next will help to determine what Europe itself will become. But until Europe takes it next big step it will be doomed to continued erosion in confidence that will put it at risk to more things going wrong and to a step up in the rate of decline especially among the weakest.

Time is running out but no one can see the clock; no one knows when the end will come. But we do know that as the situation is getting worse, remedies become harder to find. Not making a decision is, in fact, making a decision for some. And as that happens, more and more euro-nations are going to be red-lined by bankers and will find themselves on ever-thinner ice. It is not a good way to start a new year.

Large, strong Euro-Area members can pretend that they are not at-fault when the ice breaks under its weakest members and they are swept by events out of the Zone. But the decision that is enhancing that very likelihood is being made now by the failure of the Zone to make the right and timely decisions that could stop it. I do not call for temporary fixes and financing but for Europe to face up to its structural issues and make decisions to show us who it wants on which side of the line and where the lines will be drawn for the ECB, on fiscal matters and on issues of intra-Zonal cooperation as well as how the current competitiveness divide will be or won’t be addressed. Either take the noose off from around the necks of the struggling Euro-Area members or kick the stool out from under their feet. But make a choice.

INSEE Manufacturing Survey
    Since Jan 1990 Since Jan 1990
OUTLOOK Dec
11
Nov
11
Oct
11
Sep
11
%ile Rank Max Min Range Mean
Industrial Prod Trend -37 -35 -30 -30 30.4 230 43 -72 115 -7
Industrial Price Level 9 7 9 16 48.1 130 63 -41 104 9
Production
Recent Trend -6 4 0 4 47.8 203 41 -49 90 5
Likely trend -2 -5 3 6 50.8 212 27 -32 59 6
Orders/Demand
Orders&Demand -26 -17 -19 -18 41.0 189 33 -67 100 -16
FgnOrders&Demand -19 -25 -19 -15 46.2 176 45 -74 119 -12
Inventories
Levels 14 18 14 12 53.7 91 33 -8 41 12
Prices
Likely Sales Price Trend 4 7 1 7 57.1 122 28 -28 56 3
  • Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media.   Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.

    More in Author Profile »

More Economy in Brief