Even with strong capex, US nonfinancial corporations are generating more cash than they are investing

Investor sentiment worldwide is positive, especially in AI-led Asia

Sectoral shift in US job openings

Meteoric rise in AI-related semiconductor exports fueling South Korea's export boom

Regional Fed surveys showing further manufacturing acceleration in August

Sharp drop in China demand for oil helping to limit impact of Middle East conflict on the price

Decades high real price of copper posing physical challenge to investment boom

Rising US long-term real yields point to strong demand for investment funding

US retail sales accelerate even as consumers remain gloomy

Retail gasoline price still well above pre-conflict level and now rising again

PMIs showing widespread revival of global economy

Crude oil price has returned to pre-conflict level but traffic through Hormuz still subpar

Surging orders for computers and electronics propelling durable goods orders

Next year's inflation forecasts are on the rise and above target

Disrupted global supply chains placing upward pressure on US goods prices

Construction of data centers has overtaken transportation construction in US

Elevated energy prices putting intense upward pressure on input prices around the globe

US is big leader in global surge in private AI investment

Larger-than-usual income tax refunds this year are supporting consumer spending

Sharply rising share of AI-related jobs

Inflationary impact of surge in oil prices larger in Europe than in the US

Futures market thinks the price of oil will recede significantly over the next six months

Recent pickup in US defense orders could help support overall growth ahead

Cost of transporting crude oil has soared to series high

Market-based inflation expectations have not yet reflected recent surge in oil prices

Our global data offering is unparalleled in terms of coverage, quality, and organization. We offer 290+ databases from 2500 government and private sources, a wealth of key survey and forecast data covering the world’s economies, and a robust offering of archive databases that drive machine learning for big data applications.

Optimized for precision analytics, our data is seamlessly integrated with Microsoft Office and all leading statistical packages through our DLX® software and platform independent HaverView™ website. We further offer direct database feeds, client server or cloud-based delivery, and RESTful API.


Privacy Policy

Disclaimer

Contact us

Service Health

A premier time series data platform for the global strategy, research, and quant communities. 

New York

Tokyo

London

Singapore

Economy in Brief

Viewpoints

Contact Us

Our Data

Our Products

What We Do

Our Authors

About Us

Data News

Featured Data Additions

Resources

Release Calendars

Training Center

Webinars

Newsletters

Download Software

For Clients

Live Updates

Winnie Tapasanun

260918R23.jpg

260918S23.jpg

Industrial production (IP) was virtually unchanged m/m in August after rises of 0.2% in July (unrevised) and 0.2% in June (+0.3% previously), data from the Federal Reserve Board showed, indicating industrial activity remained on an upward trend despite little change in the latest month. A 0.3% m/m August increase had been expected in the Action Economics Forecast Survey. The year-on-year growth rate accelerated to 1.4% in August, the highest since May, from 1.1% in July (0.8% in August 2025). The August IP index at 103.1 was 3.8% above a low of 99.3 in November 2024 and 3.9% above a low of 99.2 in January 2024.

By **industry groups**, manufacturing production decreased 0.3% (+0.9% y/y) in August, the first m/m decline since December, after increases of 0.2% in July (unrevised) and 0.1% in June (+0.3% previously). Durable goods production fell 0.5% (+3.3% y/y) in August, down for the first time since November 2025, following a 0.6% rise in July. Within durables, almost all categories fell m/m in August, led by drops of 1.4% (-2.8% y/y) in furniture & related products and 1.4% (+0.7% y/y) in miscellaneous durable goods, followed by declines of 1.2% (+4.2% y/y) in aerospace & miscellaneous transportation equipment, 1.2% (-1.0% y/y) in motor vehicles & parts, 1.1% (+2.8% y/y) in nonmetallic mineral products, 0.5% (+8.7% y/y) in computer & electronic products, 0.3% (+0.5% y/y) in primary metals, and 0.1% (+3.6% y/y) in fabricated metal products. Notably, aircraft & parts production slid 1.4% (+7.7% y/y), the first m/m slide since January, after a 1.7% July gain. To the upside, durable goods categories for machinery (+0.5%; +6.3% y/y) and wood products (+0.2%; -0.7% y/y) posted m/m output gains in August. Durable goods for electrical equipment, appliances & components held steady m/m (+5.5% y/y) following a 0.4% July rebound.

Nondurable goods production was essentially unchanged m/m (-1.5% y/y) in August following a 0.4% decrease in July and a 0.4% rebound in June. The August flat reading reflected m/m falls of 1.0% (-4.8% y/y) in printing & related support activities, 0.9% (+0.8% y/y) in plastics & rubber products, 0.7% (+0.8% y/y) in petroleum & coal products, and 0.2% (-2.9% y/y) in paper. Meanwhile, nondurable goods categories for apparel & leather goods (+2.1%; +3.6% y/y), textiles & product mills (+1.3%; -0.1% y/y), and food, beverages & tobacco (+0.3%; -1.2% y/y) registered m/m output gains in August; output for chemicals held steady m/m (-2.6% y/y) following a 0.3% July decline.

Utilities output advanced 1.8% (6.2% y/y) in August on top of a 0.5% increase in July (unrevised), reflecting a 2.1% rise (7.0% y/y) in electric utilities output and a 0.5% decrease (+0.8% y/y) in natural gas utilities output. Mining activity edged up 0.1% (0.3% y/y) after a 0.1% July uptick (+0.2% initially). The utilities and mining series posted the third consecutive m/m gain and the fourth in five months, while recording May flat readings.

By **market groups**, materials production grew 0.2% (1.5% y/y) in August, the fourth m/m gain in five months, adding to a 0.3% rise in July. Consumer goods output ticked up 0.1% (-1.1% y/y) following a 0.3% July decrease, reflecting a 0.5% decline (-3.7% y/y) in durable consumer goods and a 0.3% increase (-0.4% y/y) in nondurable consumer goods. In contrast, construction supplies production fell 0.7% (+1.3% y/y), the first m/m fall since April, after a 0.5% July gain. Business equipment output slid 0.5% (+7.1% y/y) in August, the first m/m drop since October 2025, following a 1.0% July rise. 

In **special classifications**, factory output of selected high-tech industries was virtually unchanged m/m (+12.5% y/y) in August after four straight m/m gains, including a 1.3% increase in July. Manufacturing production excluding selected high-tech industries fell 0.3% (+0.5% y/y) in August, the first m/m decline since January, after a 0.1% increase in July. Manufacturing production excluding selected high-tech and motor vehicles & parts slipped 0.2% (+0.7% y/y), down for the first time since May, reversing a 0.2% July gain.

Capacity utilization was at 76.3% in August, the highest since July 2025, unchanged from July (unrevised). The Action Economics Forecast Survey forecasted 76.4%. The August reading was 3.1 percentage points below its long-run (1972–2025) average. Manufacturing capacity utilization fell to 75.7% in August, the lowest since March, from 76.0% in July (unrevised). The August rate was 2.5 percentage points below its long-run average.

Industrial production and capacity data are in Haver’s **USECON** database. Additional detail on production and capacity utilization can be found in the **IP** database. The expectations figures come from the **AS1REPNA** database.

260918T23.jpg

260918U23.jpg

- August IP 0.0% (+1.4% y/y) after four consecutive m/m increases, remaining on an upward trend.
- Manufacturing -0.3% (+0.9% y/y), first m/m decline since Dec., w/ durables -0.5% and nondurables 0.0%.
- Selected high-tech 0.0% after four straight m/m rises; motor vehicles -1.2%, second successive m/m drop.
- Utilities +1.8% (+6.2% y/y), fourth rise in five mths., led by a 2.1% gain in electric utilities output.
- Mining +0.1% (+0.3% y/y), up for the fourth time in five mths.
- Key categories in market groups post mixed results.
- Capacity utilization steady at 76.3%, highest since July ’25; mfg. capacity utilization down to 75.7%, lowest since March.

U.S. Industrial Production Flat in August; Manufacturing IP Down

Robert Brusca

260918E.jpg

German inflation in August saw the headline pop while core remained copacetic. The difference between the two trends is like night and day.

**Headline PPI**
Germany’s PPI spurted for the second consecutive month, rising by 1.2% in both July and August. These jumps followed a drop of 0.3% in June. The German headline PPI is up by 4.6% over 12 months, up by 12.5% at an annual rate over six months, and up at an 8.3% annual rate over three months. Those gains are largely driven by energy trends.

**The core is a different story**
The PPI excluding energy in August gained by 0.2%, the same as in July, after a 0.3% rise in June. Sequentially, the ex-energy PPI rose 3.1% (SAAR) over 12 months, at a 5.0% annual rate over six months, and at a 3.3% annual rate over three months. That’s still excessive, but much less worrisome.

**Sector stories**
The sectors, using unfortunately NSA data, show consumer prices moving lower over three months, with very mild, near-target overshooting for investment goods, while intermediate goods bear the burden of pressure. These observations are for the three-month annualized growth rates but apply equally to the 12-month growth rates.

**The CPI for reference**
German CPI inflation, included in the table as a reference, shows roughly the same patterns as the PPI, with the headline growing in excess of the ECB’s EMU-wide target pace, overshooting by about a percentage point, while the CPI ex-energy skims along at a nearly acceptable pace of overshoot that ranges from 2.2% to 2.5% over three months, six months, and 12 months.

**Inflation forces present but surprisingly contained**
Clearly, inflationary pressures are present in Germany and just as clearly, they are not spreading but have done their damage by the weight of energy in each sector. This does not mean there will not be progression or knock-on effects, just that, so far, they have not appeared. And part of this is because of ongoing economic weakness in Germany.

**QTD**
Quarter to date (QTD), the German headline two months into Q3 has risen at an 8.3% annual rate as the ex-energy PPI runs at a pace of 4%. Both are too hot. Sector inflation rates on NSA data are acceptable except for intermediate goods where the pace rises to 5.3% in the quarter (energy, again). The CPI on a quarterly basis also generates a 3.2% headline gain against a core pace of just 2.2%.

260918.jpg

**The rocky road ahead**
Brent oil prices have been somewhat wild recently, with action in the Strait of Hormuz on a volatile path. The Saudis just announced that they would be shipping no oil to Europe over the next few months as they have refinery repairs to conduct. The Houthis and the Saudis are going at it again. It’s hard to establish an outlook with this much geopolitical chaos. Best to just go day by day. My reading of the war is that the U.S. blockade has become more effective and is putting Iran under strain. Stories report that Iranian oil shipments to China have been mostly stopped. Maybe the U.S. approach finally has teeth. Will it work, or will it cause a counterattack by a trapped and pressured regime? Is a real truce between these enemies who can’t trust one another even possible? With that admitted, it is hard to see a stable end-game.

Germany

German PPI Shows Pressure, But It’s Limited

Andrew Cates

**From easing to tightening**
Market expectations concerning Fed policy have turned completely since January. Contracts covering December 2026 and the first half of 2027 then implied a federal funds rate a little above 3 per cent, comfortably below the rate the Fed was actually running, and an easing cycle was the base case. That gap closed in March and has since inverted, with the move accelerating over the past fortnight. Energy is the immediate cause. The conflict with Iran has kept crude above $100 a barrel, and August’s inflation report showed the pass-through into core prices that policymakers had hoped to avoid. This week’s quarter-point increase was accordingly almost fully priced beforehand and settled little on its own. The framing around it was another matter. Sixteen of the eighteen participants who submitted projections expect at least one further increase this year, four of them two, and the median path is held at around 4.1 per cent through the end of next year with no cuts at all. Chair Warsh’s insistence on a timelier return to target was taken as ruling out an early reversal, and equities gave up their initial gains as he spoke. Futures now sit above the committee’s own path by the middle of 2027, and the long end has followed rather than steadied. A policy rate expected to approach 4.5 per cent alongside a ten-year yield above 5 per cent speaks to term premia as much as to the Fed.

260917Z1.jpg

**Who is paying for the boom**
The tightening is arguably not the product of corporate borrowing. The latest US financial accounts reveal that American non-financial companies ran a financing surplus of around 1 per cent of GDP in Q1, which is to say that internal cash flow more than covered their capital spending. The position has held for most of the past four years, and it stands in contrast to 2000, when the sector was running a deficit of more than 3 per cent of GDP at the peak of the last (internet-led) investment cycle. That distinction matters for how the present boom is read. Aggregates conceal distribution, and a small number of hyperscalers and data-centre developers have turned to bond and private credit markets on a scale that unsettled equity investors in recent weeks. At the level of the aggregate sector, however, the marginal claim on the US saving is coming from the US government rather than from companies.

260917Z2.jpg

**A friendlier mix, for now**
The latest September survey reveals that the Blue Chip panel has made much the same adjustment almost everywhere in recent months: growth for this year has been revised up, inflation for this year revised down. Taiwan and Korea account for the largest growth upgrades, both for the same AI-related reasons, while the United States, the euro area, Japan, the United Kingdom and India all sit in the same quadrant on a more modest scale. China alone (in our sample in the chart below) has seen neither forecast moved. The combination reads well, but it needs qualifying. With a fixed target year this far advanced, most of the 2026 inflation number is already determined by outturns, so marking it down is largely a verdict on the first half of the year rather than on the energy shock now working through.

260917Z3.jpg

**The UK’s quiet labour market**
The UK labour market is no longer adding much to inflation pressure. Private-sector regular pay is growing at around 3 per cent, the slowest rate since 2020 and below its average in the years before the pandemic. Vacancies have fallen to just over 700,000, the lowest outside the pandemic period since 2014, and payrolled employment declined again in August, leaving it around 145,000 lower than a year earlier. Unemployment, at 4.9 per cent, is up on the year. Smaller firms continue to tell the official vacancy survey that they are holding back from recruitment because of labour costs. None of this settles the Bank of England's decision later this week, since the inflation problem is arriving from outside rather than from wages.

260917Z4.jpg

**China is producing strongly but spending weakly**
China's August data extended a familiar divergence. Industrial output accelerated 5.2% y/y in August after 4.5% in July, beating expectations despite four typhoons disrupting activity along the east coast. Retail sales, in contrast, grew by just 0.4%. Fixed investment in the first eight months was more than 7 per cent lower than a year earlier, a deeper contraction than through July, and investment in real estate development fell by close to a fifth. The weakness is no longer confined to property: total fixed investment turned negative last year and the pace of decline has steepened since, with private investment contracting while state-owned enterprises hold the total up. For the rest of the world the arithmetic is straightforward. An economy producing strongly and consuming weakly exports the difference, and potentially exports disinflation with it. That makes China a partial offset to the energy shock elsewhere, and raises the odds of further domestic stimulus in the immediate weeks ahead.

260917Z5.jpg

**Ten days in September**
Korean customs data offer the earliest and cleanest reading on global technology demand, and the first ten days of September produced some of the largest numbers on record. Semiconductor shipments were worth $16.5 billion in that window, close to three and a half times their value a year earlier, and accounted for 47 per cent of all Korean exports. Total exports rose by more than 80 per cent, with shipments to China doubling and those to the United States more than doubling. This is the phenomenon behind the Taiwanese and Korean forecast upgrades noted above, and it is the physical counterpart of the capital spending recorded in the American accounts. It also concentrates risk. Close to half the export earnings of a major economy now rest on a single investment theme, financed in part by borrowing whose terms are set in the market that has repriced in recent weeks.

260917Z6.jpg

The cost of energy and the cost of money set the tone this week. Brent crude held above $100 a barrel with a major Saudi pipeline still offline, and the Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate by a quarter point, its first increase since 2023. The projections accompanying the decision mattered more than the decision itself, and futures have since priced a policy rate by the middle of 2027 above anything the committee has pencilled in, with the ten-year Treasury yield through 5 per cent for the first time since 2007 (chart 1). But the source of that tightening is worth dwelling on, because American companies are not competing for credit. The non-financial corporate sector is generating more cash than it spends, and has been for most of the past four years (chart 2). Forecasters have meanwhile spent the summer nudging growth forecasts up and inflation forecasts down for this year, with Taiwan and Korea marked up by some distance the most (chart 3). Britain provided a counterpoint, with pay growth and vacancies both back at or below pre-pandemic norms ahead of the Bank of England’s decision (chart 4). China’s August figures showed industrial output accelerating while investment contracted more deeply (chart 5). And Korean customs data for the first ten days of September gave yet another reading of how much of world trade now runs through a single product (chart 6).

<iframe data-testid="embed-iframe" style="border-radius:12px" src="https://open.spotify.com/embed/episode/0CXbExxkHFXGr82bsfLGnF?utm_source=generator&si=9d9a6bd67da74f12" width="100%" height="152" frameBorder="0" allowfullscreen="" allow="autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; fullscreen; picture-in-picture" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Charts of the Week: The Price of Money

Michael J. Moran

260917A.jpg

260917B.jpg

Housing activity has been sluggish in the past few years, with private residential construction making negative contributions to GDP growth in seven of the past 10 quarters. The constraints have been small, averaging -0.06 percentage point, but a drag nonetheless (chart, upper left). The third quarter is on track for another negative contribution, as housing starts in July and August trail the average in the prior quarter by 3.9%.

Total housing starts in August were soft, declining 2.6%. The drop occurred from an upward revised reading in July (5.7% firmer than previously believed), but the initial reading was not impressive, and the adjusted level was still in the low portion of the recent range. The drop in August pushed total starts further into the low portion of the range (the fourth lowest since the start of 2023; chart, upper right).

It is tempting to dismiss the decline in August as random volatility, as the change was dominated by a retreat in the volatile multi-family sector (off 21.7%). We have seen similar degrees of multi-family noise in other recent months (-41.4% in May and a rebound of 83.3% in June). As such, there is a good chance that September will show a pickup in multi-family starts. However, a focus on trends still suggests a soft tone in housing.

In seeking to identify housing trends, building permits, because they are less volatile, provide more insight than starts do. Single-family permits trended lower during much of 2024 and early 2025, and they have moved sideways since late last year, signaling little chance of a positive contribution to economic growth (chart, lower left). Multi-family permits drifted upward during 2025, but they have turned a corner so far this year, as shown by the six-month average in the lower right chart. The recent increase in long-term interest rates (up approximately one-half percentage point since June) leads one to worry about a softening in housing trends.

The housing starts and permits figures can be found in Haver’s **USECON** database. The expectations figure is contained in the **AS1REPNA** database.

260917C.jpg

260917D.jpg

- A drop in multi-family activity in August offset a gain in the single-family sector.
- Q3 shaping up to be another soft quarter for housing.

Housing Starts: Upward Revisions to June & July, but a Drop in August

Kathleen Stephansen, CBE

260917A0.jpg

260917B0.jpg

Initial claims for unemployment insurance dropped by 10,000 to 196,000 in the week ending September 12 from an unrevised level of 206,000 in the week ending September 5. The four-week average was 203,250 in the September 12 week, down from 206,000 in the September 5 week, also unrevised. Claims have been largely range-bound at historically low levels between 200,000 and 230,000. The Action Economics/Haver Analytics Survey looked for 206,000 claims to have been filed.

The total number of unemployment insurance beneficiaries—also known as “continuing claims”— dropped 39,000 to 1.730 million in the week ending September 5, down from 1.769 million in the week in the week ending August 29, revised from 1.774 million. The four-week moving average was 1.761 million in the September 5 week, down from 1.778 million in the August 29 week. The insured unemployment rate remained edged down to 1.1% in the September 5 week from 1.2% in the week of August 29, and the first drop since the April 25 week.

The insured unemployment rate varies greatly across individual states and territories. In the week ending August 29, the highest unemployment rates were in Massachusetts (2.03%), Puerto Rico (2.57%), and New Jersey (2.58%). The lowest rates were in South Dakota (0.21%), Florida (0.34%), Louisiana (0.34%), Alabama (0.35%), Kentucky (0.36%), North Carolina (0.37%), Arkansas (0.42%), Nebraska (0.43%), Iowa and North Dakota (both 0.44%), Tennessee (0.45%), Kansas (0.46%), Idaho (0.47%), and Wyoming (0.48%). Rates in other notable states include Texas (1.01%), Pennsylvania (1.39%), Illinois (1.41%), New York (1.72%) and California (1.78%). These state data are not seasonally adjusted.

Data on weekly unemployment claims are from the Department of Labor itself, not the Bureau of Labor Statistics. They begin in 1967 and are contained in Haver’s **WEEKLY** database and summarized monthly in **USECON**. Data for individual states are in **REGIONW** back to December 1986.

260917C0.jpg

260917D0.jpg

- New claims declined by 10,000 to 196,000 in the week of September 12.
- Continuing claims dropped by 39,000 to 1.730 million in the week ending September 5.
- The insured unemployment rate inched down to 1.1% in the week of September 5, the first drop since April 25.

U.S. Initial Unemployment Claims Dropped in the Week of September 12

Economy in Brief: December 2004

Jump to: