Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics

Introducing

Robert Brusca

Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media.   Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.

Publications by Robert Brusca

  • Total German industrial orders fell by 2.2% in February after gaining 2.3% month-to-month in January and 2.4% in December. This decline ends a strong run for orders in Germany. February, of course, is the month in which the invasion of Ukraine began - it was in late-February - so we are likely still looking ahead to the impact of that invasion on German orders. As things stand, over 12 months German orders are rising 2.9%, over six months the annual rate bumps up to 4.8%, and over three months the annual rate of expansion is at 10.2%. German orders are still on an accelerating trend, but it looks like that's about to be cut short by war.

    Foreign orders German foreign orders have been a little bit more irregular month-to-month; they fell by 3.3% in February after rising 9.5% in January and falling by 3% in December. Foreign orders are up by 4.1% over 12 months, they rise at an 8.6% annual rate over six months and accelerate to an 11.2% pace over three months.

    Domestic orders German domestic orders fall by 0.2% in February after falling by 7.2% in January and rising by 10.5% in December. Domestic orders rise by 1.3% over 12 months, they fall at a 0.6% rate over six months and then they rebound to rise at a 9.4% annual rate over three months. German domestic orders are weaker overall than foreign orders and their path is one that is more erratic.

    Quarter-to-date In quarter to date basis, which is two months into the current quarter, total orders are rising at a 19.8% annual rate. Foreign orders are rising at a 41.5% annual rate while domestic orders are falling at a 6% annual rate.

    Real manufacturing and mining sales patterns Real sales by sector are more erratic than orders have been. Real sales from mining and manufacturing fell 1.4% in February after rising 1.5% in January and gaining 0.8% in December. Sequentially, mining and manufacturing sector sales are rising, but apart from showing growth there is no acceleration. Over 12 months sales gain 4.2%, that accelerates sharply to 17.2% over six months then backs down to a 3.6% annual rate over three months. Manufacturing sales by themselves show the same pattern.

    Real manufacturing sales by sector While sales by sector are also erratic, they show growth. Consumer goods sales rise 5.8% over 12 months, slip back to 4.8% at an annual rate over six months and then jump to an 8.5% annual rate over three months. The strength in sales comes from consumer durables that rise by 7% over 12 months, increase their pace to 12.6% over six months and then accelerate further to 22.7% annual rate over three months. In contrast, consumer nondurable goods sales are more erratic, rising by 5.5% over 12 months, slowing into a 3.2% annual rate over six months and then rising at a 6.1% annual rate over three months. Capital goods rise by 1.4% over 12 months, accelerate to a sharp 28.3% annual rate over six months and then decline at a 5.2% annual rate over three months. Intermediate goods show a 3.7% growth rate over 12 months, rising to a 6.9% pace over six months following back to a 3.9% pace over three months. Real sector sales are much more sluggish than orders. Orders usually lead, but this gap could also reflect supply chain problems.

    Quarter-to-date by sector Quarter-to-date growth rates by sector show a 12.9% annual rate for manufacturing with overall consumer goods at a 5.4% annual rate, led by a 17.2% annual rate for consumer durables and held back by a 3.5% annual rate for consumer nondurables. Capital goods sales are rising at a 17.2% annual rate; intermediate goods gain at just a 0.9% annual rate.

    Big Four EMU economies and their EU metrics The industrial readings according to the EU industrial confidence index show different patterns for the largest economies in the European Monetary Union. For Germany, the net readings are strong, but they decay from December to January to February; they also show sequential monthly decay in Italy. France shows an erratic monthly pattern while Spain shows monthly acceleration. The queue standings for each of these countries that place the current reading in a ranked queue of data since 1990 show all of them to be strong, in their 90th percentile or higher for this period. Spain has the highest relative standing at 99.7%, followed by Germany at 98.7%, France at 94.7%, and Italy at 92.8%. According to the EU data, the industrial sectors are strong in all these countries – this is ahead of the outbreak of war...

    Compare to the pre-Covid situation Looking at changes back to January 2020 before the Covid struck, we see the largest gain and the German industrial sector where its EU index is up by 36.5 points; for France, Italy and Spain, the indexes are up by 12 to 14 points for the period. On the same timeline, German orders are up by 7% with foreign orders up 7.1% and domestic orders up by 6.9%; these metrics reveal a tightly clustered sense of rebound. However, sector sales are very different matter. For Germany, mining and manufacturing sales are down by 1.3% on this timeline while manufacturing alone has sales down by 1.2%. Consumer goods sales are down by 0.4% although durable consumer goods sales are up by 6.1% and consumer nondurables sales are down by 1.5%. Capital goods sales are down by 5.8% while intermediate goods post an increase of 2.9%. Order-versus-sales metrics look very different.

  • Japan's trade deficit remained in force in March. While it improved slightly month-to-month, it continued to hover near its largest recent deficit reading. Japan now has a string of 12 consecutive monthly deficits on its trade account. These deficits are back in force after a previous string of 22 monthly deficits over 25 consecutive months in 2018-2020. Japan, once the most dominant exporter globally with seemingly structural trade surpluses, has become a persisting-deficit country. What happened?

    Japan's trade deficit shifts – explained by oil In 2008, spiking oil prices pushed Japan's trade into deficit. Then oil prices backed off and the Japan's surplus returned. In 2011, Japan was hit with a Tsunami, an earthquake, and a nuclear accident – a trifecta-storm of trouble. With world oil prices fluctuating around $100 per barrel, Japan's trade deficit plunged deeper into the red-ink zone as Japan began to import more oil. By 2012, all Japan's nuclear power stations were shuttered, in response to the natural-disaster-induced nuclear accident and Japan was back dependent on oil imports. In mid-2014, with Japan's deficit well-established, oil prices suddenly collapsed, helping to swing Japan's trade deficit back into surplus. After spot oil fell to a low in May 2016, Japan's surplus shot up. Then, again in April 2020, oil prices fell briefly below $20/barrel and Japan's deficit contracted sharply- and briefly. Since then, Japan's deficit has re-emerged and grown as oil prices have surged. The story of Japan's trade balance is largely a story of oil and Japan's experiences in shutting down its nuclear power plants. Today Japan's trade picture is still painted by the whims of global oil.

    The chart (above) shows only the recent deficit behavior. Export and import growth rates each have flattened out with imports holding to higher growth than exports. As a result, the trade situation is deteriorating with the deficit is plunging again and a good part of that is because of oil prices.

    The yen has been steadily weakening without much impact on trade flows so far.

    Real trade flows Export and import prices both rise at a 20% annual rate over three months, but over 12 months import prices are up by a much stronger 33% compared to 13% for exports. Meanwhile, real export growth has been flat or negative while real imports have accelerated, logging a 14.6% annualized gain over three months.

  • Sweden saw inflation jump in March, rising by 2% month-to-month on the HICP measure. This is a much stronger gain than the 0.2% rise in February and even the 0.5% increase in January.

    Inflation in Sweden continues to accelerate sharply. Sequentially, Swedish inflation starts at 6.3% over 12 months; that pace rises to a 9.4% annual rate over six months and that, in turn, further escalates to an 11.5% annual rate over three months. Sweden's inflation has jumped ahead and is showing extreme pressure in March.

    Inflation diffusion (breadth) A look at the summary statistics on inflation diffusion at the bottom of the table shows that inflation over three months compared to six months rises in 87% of the categories -there are eight of them in the table. Diffusion also rises in 87% of the categories over six months compared to 12 months, and it rises in 87% of the categories over 12 months compared to the previous twelve months. Inflation is accelerating broadly over each of these timelines and the increase in inflation from period to period is significant.

    Monthly pressures In March, Sweden posts deceleration in a select few categories: inflation for clothing & shoes with a 0.5 month-to-month drop that is a larger drop than in February shows deceleration; recreation & culture prices decelerate to a 1% pace down only slightly from 1.1% in February month-to-month; in education there is a technical month-to-month drop that does not register rounded to one decimal-both months rad ‘zero' in the table. The upward pressure on inflation in February remains high and broad-based. In February, there are three month-to-month inflation decelerations against a series of much larger increases. January saw decelerations in only two of eight categories while six of eight registered acceleration.

    Sequential pressures Of the 24 observations on inflation changes period-to-period (that's eight items over three periods: three-months, six-months, and 12-months), only three show period-to-period deceleration. Obviously over the past year inflation has spread broadly in Sweden. Housing costs gains while high at 7.9% year-over-year (above the HICP pace of 6.3%) proceeded to lose momentum over six months and again over three months. That makes housing a substantial outlying reading. The only other weaking of inflation over these periods is over 12 months compared to the 12-month period of 12-months ago - that is for clothing & shoes. Apart from those three exceptions, price gains accelerated over all three periods in 21 of 24 comparisons – led in each period by transportation costs because of rising energy prices.

    Quarter-to-date The quarter-to-date inflation pressures show inflation for the finished quarter at an 8.6% annual rate. This is lower than the three-month rate and lower than the six-month rate. But quarter-to-date figures tend to be more sluggish because they are for the current quarter that's a three-month average compared to the quarter before which is another three-month average. These broad average figures are still compounded at an annual rate and 8.6% is still a particularly high inflation rate. The inflation rate for the first quarter of 2022-to-date is now completed; it compares to a fourth quarter rate of 6.4%. Inflation is still accelerating quarter-to-quarter, a gain of more than two percentage points on the quarterly period. Looking down the line items at quarter-to-date metrics, inflation eases a little bit for housing QTD, for recreation & culture, and for education. However, all other categories show inflation accelerating in the first quarter compared to the fourth quarter. This is not surprising given the strong sequential trend that we see although the quarterly averaging process can produce slightly different reports from the sequential data.

    Summing up for Sweden On balance, Sweden is in the grip of the same kind of inflation that we've seen in Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Clearly a good deal of this inflation is driven by energy, by heating oil costs, by natural gas costs, by gasoline costs and by knock-on effects which are a little harder to gauge. However, Sweden, a country with its own currency and not part of the European Monetary Union, continues to show that these same sorts of forces are impacting its economy and its inflation rate. Having a floating exchange rate is not giving it any insulation from imported inflation. Sweden is part of this global process where inflation has moved up and continues to require responses from central banks everywhere except Japan.

  • United Kingdom
    | Apr 13 2022

    U.K. Inflation Continues Its Spurt

    Inflation in the United Kingdom surged, rising by 1.1% in March after gaining 0.6% in both February and January. Inflation, using the HICP measure- which is also the CPI for the U.K. - continues to accelerate from a 7% pace over 12 months to 9.3% over six months to a 9.5% annual rate over three months. Inflation in the U.K., like in the U.S. and like in Germany, is running loose and it's too hot for the central bank’s inflation target of 2%. And in the U.K., that target continues to apply to the CPI (or HICP) although the official inflation rate in the U.K. is the CPIH which also includes an estimate for housing services much like the U.S. CPI. The CPIH rose by 1% in March, accelerating from 0.5% in February and 0.5% in January. It is accelerating and a little bit less sharply from 6.3% over 12 months to 8.3% over six months to an annual rate of 8.7% over three months. The rate of change of the CPIH is a little bit less than for the CPI and its acceleration from 12 months ago is also tamer. But the signals and changes are broadly similar.

    There's also available, currently, an ex-food, ex-energy (and ex-alcohol) core measure for the CPIH. That metric is also accelerating, the 0.8% gain in March is up from 0.4% in February and 0.6% in January. The CPIH core accelerates from a 5.2% pace over 12 months to a 6.3% pace over six months to a 7.6% pace over three months. This gauge is running a little bit less hot than the CPI and the CPIH, but its acceleration is nearly the same as for the CPI measure.

    Turning to the 10 categories of the CPIH in the table, inflation is accelerating in March in five of them. In both January and February, inflation accelerated month-to-month in five of them as well. In addition, inflation in the various headline series also accelerated month-to-month except for February when the CPIH and core measures did not accelerate - but only the core rate backed down.

    The diffusion indicators at the bottom of the table capture the breadth of acceleration; these are calculated using even the headlines in the table to provide a little bit more weight to those categories that deserve more weight. The aggregate diffusion measure shows inflation in January, February, and March that has continued to run with pretty much the same breadth with inflation accelerating at about 60% of the categories with some slight let-up in February when that percentage fell to 46%.

    Looking at sequential behavior, inflation from 12-months to six-months to three-months we see that over three months there's acceleration across the 10 categories in half of them. Over six months we see acceleration everywhere with one exception that being communication. And over 12 months we find the same thing with acceleration everywhere except for communication.

    At the same time, the diffusion statistics show the breadth of inflation over 12 months has moved up to 92% which is sharply higher than it had been over 12 months for the 12-month period previous to this when inflation was only rising in 23% of the categories and the headline for the CPI was up only 0.7%. Inflation over the last 12 months has accelerated extremely sharply and extremely broadly. Over six months inflation has continued to accelerate, running up to a very high pace and accelerating by more than two-percentage points between 12-months and six-months with the breadth of acceleration in 92% of the categories. Over three months there is some backing off as the headline continues to accelerate slightly to a 9.5% pace from a 9.3% pace. The CPIH shows slightly more acceleration (six- to three-months) and the CPIH core measure shows even more acceleration, but the details of the report show that across all inflation readings inflation only accelerated and about 61% of the categories over three months. That is still broad, well above the neutral reading of 50%, but well back of the 92% marks set over six and 12 months.

    Over three months in those categories where inflation has backed off accelerating, the results have not been particularly dramatic. For food & nonalcoholic beverages, the inflation rate nicked lower to 8.1% from 8.2%; for housing and household expenditures the inflation rate annualized over three months stands at 5.1% compared to a 6.2% pace over six months. Health care costs rose by only 1.7% at an annual rate over three months compared to 2.6% over six months. Education costs rose at a 3.3% pace over three months compared to 5.3% over six months. And miscellaneous goods & services prices rose at a 1.5% pace over three months compared to 2.5% over six months. While there are 5 categories where acceleration backed off, half of the detailed categories, over three months the backing off was modest and in the end dominated by acceleration in other categories.

  • German inflation surged in March, jumping by 2.1% month-to-month in March alone. In ECB parlance, the HICP target is for a gain of 2% over 12 months, not in one month. The German contribution to EMU-wide inflation is way over the line. German core HICP inflation is more modest in March but still excessive. It is up by 0.5% month-to-month for an annualized rate of 6.1%.

    Headline inflation trends Over 12 months, the German HICP is up by 7.6%. Over six months, the annualized pace is 11.4%. Over three months, the pace is up to a whopping 17.6% - I won't try to annualize the month-to-month gain for you, but that is going to be in the stratosphere.

    Core inflation trends The core rate is up by 3.7% over 12 months and its annualized pace over six months rises to 4.2%. But over three months, the HICP core pace is back down to 3.7%. That is good news and evidence of inflation resilience in the face of a raging headline. However, the German domestic CPI is not so upbeat as its 3-month core pace accelerates from three-months to six-months to 12-months, with no drop-back.

    Inflation diffusion – a hopeful sign? Inflation diffusion, the breadth of inflation acceleration across the main CPI categories, is at 81.8% for year-over-year inflation-that metric compares the 12 month-rise in price changes across categories to their respective 12-month increases of 12-months ago. Over six months diffusion drops to 54.5%, a comparison of inflation acceleration over six-months relative to 12 months. That acceleration is modest despite the actual very strong gain of inflation over six months. Over three months as well the diffusion reading is 54.5%; that metric compares inflation acceleration over three months compared to over six months. Diffusion at 100% indicates inflation accelerating in all categories; diffusion at zero percent indicates inflation accelerating in no categories. 50 percent is the 'point of neutrality' where inflation acceleration and deceleration are balanced. At 54.5% diffusion three- and six-month inflation acceleration this month is showing some net increased inflation pressure, but not much. Certainly, diffusion suggests that the breadth of inflation is not as intractable as inflation strength suggests. Whether this is good news or evidence that inflation must spread further before it can settle down, only time will tell.

    Where inflation is most intense Over three months inflation accelerates in six categories: a 46.8% annual rate in transportation, a 26.8% annualized gain for rent & utilities, a 9.7% pace for food, a 8.8% for restaurants & hotels, a 6.6% pace for alcohol, and a -1.3% pace for communications (since over six months prices in that category had fallen even faster, the 1.3% drop is technically a period-to-period acceleration). Over six months the same categories accelerated except that communication drops out replaced by recreation & culture. Over 12 months acceleration is broad based; it accelerates everywhere except for two categories: education and 'other.'

    Brent oil prices During this sequence of dates, Brent oil prices measured in euros have accelerated from a rising pace of 85.3% over 12 months to 156.8% over six months to 461.1% over three months. A great deal of the inflation acceleration impulse is coming from oil and commodities and through food. Transportation and 'rent & utilities' are the leading two inflation categories in each time segment with food in the third position each time. Still, food and energy are important and just because inflation is intense there does not mean it will stay there and not migrate to other categories. When food and energy cause cost pressures, that often generates broader price pressures as well. So, while the breadth of inflation in Germany is restrained since so much of the inflation has been recent, it is not yet clear how much of it has yet to be transmitted into final product prices before prices can stabilize and inflation can settle down.

  • The OECD leading economic indicator for the entire OECD region fell by 0.1% in March, matching its 0.1% decline in February. Over three months the index is falling at a 0.7% annual rate, the same pace as its decline over six months. Over 12 months it's rising by 2.7%. The standing of the index level is at the queue percentile standing at the 50% mark putting at exactly at its median - a neutral standing overall for growth prospects.

    The index for the OECD-7 was flat in March after being flat in February. The index shows two declines, one over three months and another over six months with a 3% increase over 12 months. The index level standing is slightly better than for the whole of the OECD region at its 52.7 percentile.

    The euro area shows a -0.1% reading for March, the same as February. Hit declines at a 1.4% annual rate over three months compared to minus 1.2% over six months and the 2.9% gain over 12 months, the index is at a 57.2 percentile standing for the euro area, a more moderate position.

    For Japan, the OECD index is flat in both March and in February. It's flat over three months; it declines at a 0.1% pace over six months and is up by just 1.5% pace over 12 months. Its index logs a 65.8 percentile standing, marking it as stronger than the other OCED standing in the table. Japan's economy has been and remains sluggish.

    The U.S. metric shows no change in March and no change in February with a 0.1% rise over three months. It logs a -0.2% change over six months and over 12 months at a 2.9% increase. The U.S. LEI has a 51-percentile standing based on its index level, leaving its leading economic index just slightly above its historic median and pointing to a 'normal' outlook for growth.

    Evaluating six-month growth rates in the LEI Taking a second look at these LEIs looking at them in terms of their six-month growth rates, which is the way the OECD likes to look at the indicators for their leading index properties, we find that in March all of these countries and these groupings show declines; when we add China to the mix it also shows a decline. In February, there is weakness across the board apart from Japan that's flat and the euro area that logs in at a 0.1% increase. Looking at the growth rates over six months for six-months ago, we see negative values for the U.S. and for China with small to modest positive percent changes for Japan, the euro area, and the OECD group as a whole as well as for the OECD-7. Looking at the assessments for 12-month growth that existed one-year ago, we see positive values across the board for all the countries and all the groupings including China.

    However, we can also rank these growth rates. And ranking the growth rates on their recent six-month growth leaves every single one of them below their historic median that means a ranking below 50%. The strongest rankings from March are from Japan and the U.S. with each of them sporting a 44.2 percentile standing. The weakness ranking comes from the euro area at a 21.2 percentile standing, followed by a 27.4 percentile standing for the OECD area as a whole and a 29.8% standing for China alone.

    The OECD leading indicators show great deal of sluggishness globally. The economies for the most part rank somewhere in the range of sluggish, weak, or declining. That is in terms of their outlook. We continue to see actual economic growth positive across the OECD area and even in China where the zero COVID policies have held back growth by quite a lot. However, the leading indicators warn about the future and these indications come amid a period where inflation has been flaring and with central banks beginning to become more restrictive. It continues to be an uneven patch for the global economy.

  • Japan's economy watchers index in March bounced back, rising to 47.8 from 37.7 in February. At that level, the economy watchers index has a 59.8 percentile standing above its historic median that occurs at standings mark of 50%.

    The index showed improvement across all its components in the current reading. This marked a reversal month-to-month showing increases in every component compared to February when there were declines in every component except two; in February services and employment had improved.

    Among the current components, the highest standing is for employment at an 88.3 percentile standing; that's followed by eating and drinking places that have a 66.9 percentile standing and retailing with a 64-percentile standing. The weakest current standing is for housing at a 38.1 percentile standing followed by the total for corporations at a 39.7 percentile standing.

    The economy watchers future index also improved; that index rose to 50.1 in March from 44.4 in February. Its standing is at its 65.7 percentile mark, a moderately firm standing. The future readings all improved in March and this contrasts to February, when 4 component readings were weaker month-to-month while 6 improved by the month.

    The future index shows the highest standings for services followed by eating and drinking places followed by the response by households. The weakest reading is for housing followed by manufacturers.

    Still, the trends for the economy are not particularly strong. The three-month change still shows a decline in the current index and a net decline for all components. Over six months all the categories plus the headline increase excluding housing - that is weaker. Over 12 months everything in the current index has a weaker change than over the previous 12 months- but three components manage net gains on the comparison.

    The future index shows only three components are stronger over three months, but only two components fall by more over three months than they fall over six months - those are housing and manufacturing. Over six months all the components are net lower and falling by more over six months than over 12 months. Over 12 months all components are showing bigger decline or smaller increases than they had over the previous 12 months – five categories manage outright gains but these are smaller than the gains logged 12 months ago-hence weaker momentum.

  • German industrial production advanced by 0.2% in February. Its rise followed a 1.4% gain in January and a 0.9% gain in December. Industrial output in Germany is accelerating from a 3% pace over 12 months to a 9.3% annual rate over six months to a 10.7% annual rate over three months. Despite infections with the virus and despite the increasingly dangerous situation in Ukraine during that period, Germany has continued to rebound. As the war in Ukraine started in late-February, the German economy seems to have put itself on firm footing.

    German IP is accelerating and looks very solid The output gained in the headline is supported by all the main sectors on trend. In February, two of three sectors made month-to-month gains: consumer goods and intermediate goods saw output rise with capital goods output falling back by 2%. However, from 12-months to six-months to three-months consumer goods output is accelerating from an annual rate of 10.7% to 14.9% to 25.8%. Capital goods output falls over 12 months declining by 2.1%. But then it accelerates to a 9.8% pace over six months but does step back to a growth rate of just 4.2% over three months. Intermediate goods advance at a 1.3% pace over 12 months, accelerate to 5.2% over six months and accelerate further to 9.0% over three months. Two of three industrial sectors support the acceleration in the headline. German acceleration backsliding in capital goods interrupts the trend of sector acceleration in output over three months. And that backsliding is to a growth rate that sill registers 4.2% growth at an annual rate over three months-still quite solid.

    German manufacturing gauges mostly show growth Manufacturing output was flat in February after gains of 0.6% in January and 1.6% in December. So, during this monthly period, the growth in manufacturing was slowing; however, more broadly, manufacturing output accelerates from 1.4% over 12 months to a pace of 8.6% over six months to a pace of 9.2% over three months. Similarly, real manufacturing orders in Germany grow by 2.9% over 12 months, accelerate to 4.8% over six months and accelerate further to 10.2% over three months. However, real sector sales are a little more uneven; they're growing on all the horizons, but the 4.3% growth over 12 months is still slightly higher than the 4% growth rate over three months.

    German indicators are mixed German industrial indicators show mixed performance during the period. The ZEW index is an exception, logging negative readings in each of the last three months. Despite those negative readings, the ZEW index improved slightly to -8.1 in February from -10.2 in January. The IFO gauge for manufacturing improved in February and the expectations gauge for manufacturing also improved in February although the EU Commission industrial index slipped slightly from 24.2 in January to 23.7 in February. Looking at the averages of 12-months to six-months to three-months, the ZEW average is weaker over three months than it is over 12 months. The IFO manufacturing index is slightly weaker over three months as its average falls to 103 when averaged over three months compared to a 12-month average of 104.2. The IFO manufacturing expectations are also weaker at 101.8 over three months compared to a 12-month average of 103.7. The EU Commission index is slightly stronger at 24.4 average over three months compared to 21.8 over 12 months.

    Other Europe is mixed Turning to early-February reports from other European countries, there are five others that are reporting. Norway and France show output declines in February; Ireland, Portugal, and Sweden show increases in February. However, the countries that show increases in February show declines in January and vice versa. So, what we're looking at in Europe is monthly volatility. Looking at annualized growth rates over 12 months, six months and three months, there is not a lot of strength. Portugal, Sweden, and Norway log three-month growth rates that are all negative Norway, in fact, shows negative growth rates over three months, six months and 12 months. In contrast, France shows positive growth rates throughout; it is improving over three months compared to 12 months, rising from 3.4% over 12 months to a 7.3% pace over three months. Ireland shows acceleration, moving from -15.4% over 12 months to -12.1% over six months to log a spectacular annualized gain of 32.9% over three months.

    Quarter-to-date German IP orders and real sales: In the quarter-to-date, most German IP responses are strong. Germany shows industrial output increasing in a 9.1% pace QTD, led by consumer goods that are rising strongly at a 37.6% annual rate but held back somewhat by capital goods where output is declining at a 5.5% annual rate. Manufacturing output is increasing at a 5.8% annual rate in the quarter-to-date with real manufacturing orders up at a 0.5% pace, but real sector sales are falling at a 0.4% annual rate.

    German indicators: German indicators show mixed performance QTD; the ZEW index is down by 6.4 points in the quarter-to-date and the EU Commission index is down by 0.4 points in the quarter-to-date. The two IFO gauges for manufacturing and manufacturing expectations each show a gain of 2.4 points on the quarter.

    Other Europe QTD-the good, the bad, and the homely: Turning to other Europe, Ireland shows an outstanding rise of 69.2% in an annual rate followed by France at an 8.4% pace of gain QTD; Norway’s rise is at a 5.8% pace, Portugal shows output receding at a 15.2% annual rate, Sweden shows output declining at a 4% annual rate.

    European industrial data are firm ahead of the Ukraine-Russia outbreak These data set us up to assess the pre-Ukraine-Russia war standing of industry in Germany and select countries in Europe. Conditions rate firm-to-strong amid some variability- as always. The March reports will be more telling.

  • Industrial production rose by 0.2% in February after declining for two months in January and in December 2021. Manufacturing output has declined in only one of the last three months falling by 0.9% in January flanked by minor increases of 0.2% or less in December 2021 and February 2022.

    Data for three key industries in Sweden show mixed trends. For food beverages and tobacco, there is a steady deceleration as growth drops from 5.4% over 12 months to a pace of 3.9% annualized over six months to -6.8% over three months. However, for textiles, the pattern is irregular with the declines over three and 12 months versus a solid increase over six months. For motor vehicles, there's a 16.4% decline over 12 months, a 7.2% annual rate of decline over six months followed by a 7.1% decline over three months. That marks a technical acceleration even though all the growth rates are negative.

    Sector weakness trends are mostly mixed: intermediate goods show a mixed pattern but with 12-month growth and three-month growth nearly the same at -3% annualized. Investment goods also show a mixed trend but with the 12-month declining pace at -1.8% and the three-month annualized decline at -1.7%. Nondurable consumer goods output shows an ongoing deceleration from a 14.7% annual rate increase over 12 months to a 6% pace over six months to a declining pace at -13.2% over three months. Consumer trends have pulled back steadily and sharply.

    Quarter-to-date trends for Sweden show at a -3.9% annual rate of decline; that's for two of three months hard data in the first quarter. Manufacturing output is falling at a 4% pace in the quarter-to-date. By industry, there are declines in the quarter-to-date of 7% for food, beverages & tobacco and of 9.3% for textiles although for motor vehicles there is an increase at 11.6% annual rate. Sectors show declines throughout with intermediate goods falling at a 1.8% annual rate, investment goods at a 4.2% annual rate, and nondurable consumer goods at a 4.5% annual rate.

    Comparing output to January 2020, before the virus had struck most places, overall industrial production excluding construction has risen by 2.2% on that timeline; manufacturing is up by 2.8%. On that same timeline, output in all three industries in the table is lower and two of the sectors are lower: intermediate goods and investment goods. The overall result for manufacturing has been pulled up by nondurable consumer goods where output has advanced by 18%.

    Inflation data are also contained in this table as a point of reference. Inflation continues to accelerate from 4.4% over 12 months to 5.9% over six months to 6.3% over three months. The core rate also accelerates from 2.8% to 4.2% to 5.4% on the same timeline. Sweden is caught up in the global inflation problem.

  • The total, or composite PMI from Markit in March, generally weakened. In Europe, for the EMU and its largest economies, there was month-to-month weakness across the board. But in the U.S., the Markit composite index moved up to 57.7 from 55.9. For 19 key countries, the composite PMI slowed in 13 of them with four of them posting PMI values below 50, indicating economic contraction. This contrasts to February, when only three slowed, and only three posted PMI values below 50. However, the unweighted average for the group of countries has moved from 52 in January to 54.6 in February back down to 53.6 in March. The median similarly shows a move from 51 in January to 55.3 in February backing off the 54.6 in March.

    These unweighted trends show a weakness between March and February but still show March levels of activity above those in January. The slowing is broad but not severe.

    Sequential data looking at averages over 12 months six months and three months show the average PMI reading falling from 54.6 over 12 months to 54.0 over six months to 53.4 over three months. For the median, the average for the group falls from 55.1 over 12 months to 53.7 over six months staying at 53.7 over three-months.

    The evaluation of the level of activity that corresponds to the average and median shows that these countries are in an average percentile standing of their range between 81% and 83%. The 81% to 83% percentile marks a very high position for the high-low range of outcomes for the various reporting countries. However, the queue standing data produce different, weaker, results. The queue data are obtained by ranking each country's current value among its set of values from January 2018 to date expressing the current standing as a percentile standing. So the queue percentile standings are ordinal standings. Viewed in this way, the average queue standing for the group is at its 58.6 percentile while the median is at its 66.7% percentile. That's a reasonably large gap between the average and the median. But for both, these are considerably weaker readings than the high-low percentile standings. What this suggests is that while most of these countries have a percentile standing that are relatively high in their high-low range, when ranked among all observations, countries are much closer to their average and median values.

    Still, the data over three months, six months and 12 months, show that there are only between five and two countries over these periods averaging PMI values below 50 indicating economic contraction. For the bulk of countries, growth remains the rule of order. However, there is a clear tendency toward weakening. The 12-month average shows no country weaker than its previous 12-month average. But the six-month average compared to the 12-month average shows weakening in 13 of 19 reporters and over three months there's a weakening in 16 of 19 reporters. While the statistics show a broad weakening, we can see from the data on averages and medians that the weakness is not really very pronounced; it may be broad and consistent, but it's not pronounced.

    Wrap up Among the salient trends for March, we find a sharp weakening in Russia's PMI as it falls to 37.7 from 50.8 in the early wake of sanctions. Only Ghana shows its PMI weakening in each of the last three months. Sweden is the only country where the PMI weakens for just two months in a row (March and February). Over three months only Egypt has three readings each below 50 although Russia and Japan come close on that score. Only Brazil shows steady acceleration, improving averages from 12-months to six-months to three-months. Brazil in the only country showing its highest reading since January 2018 (100% percentile standing).

    There are sanctions at work that, eventually, may slow growth globally more broadly than just Russia. If China backs Russia, things could get much dicier, especially if the same sort of sanctions are implemented. There is still the virus, and it has continued to hit China hard, as China continues down the road to zero-Covid. And global supply chain issues are still unsolved while central banks grapple with high inflation and take steps to reign it in. The environment still possesses some significant risks. Meanwhile, PMI levels are only moderately firm on average based on queue standing averages.

  • In March, of the 18 manufacturing PMI entries in the table, 12 worsened. Only one-third of the countries improved month-to-month. This is the same split as over three months when 12 also declined compared to six months ago. Asia weakened broadly with Japan and Indonesia as exceptions.

    Some PMIs indicate sector contraction Five countries report manufacturing PMI values below 50, indicating that manufacturing is contracting in those places. These entries include Mexico, China, Russia, Malaysia, and Turkey. China is experiencing a wave of Covid reinfections and remain dedicated to its zero-Covid policy.

    China and Russia Flares of infection in China led to swift and broad targeted shutdowns that greatly impact the economy there. With the Russia-Ukraine war having started in late-February and economic sanctions imposed on Russia because of its aggression, the Russian manufacturing PMI slipped to 48.6 in February from 51.8 in January. It has in March fallen again to 44.1, indicating sector contraction as sanctions begin to bite- and this is only the beginning of that process.

    Malaysia, Turkey, and Mexico Malaysia has experienced a spike in Covid infections in March as they peaked early in the month – part of the reason for its weakness. Turkey saw its PMI weaken on the month and fall to indicate contraction; it is less a case of virus issues as its outbreak peaked in early-February. Inflation in Turkey, however, has surged to over 61%. Mexico is an odd case with its Covid infections peaking early in the year and dropping since. Mexican inflation, however, has been on the rise. Its PMI is below 50 indicates contraction and it ranks below its historic median as well; nonetheless, it stands in the top 20% of its historic range of values. We can conclude that Mexico's weakness may not be as severe as its standing implies because of a very tight distribution of values. With such extraordinary weakness China and Russia have the larges gap between their range and standing positions, but among other entries Mexico and Vietnam are the next largest gaps. The median gap is 13 percentage points; for Mexico, the gap is 34 percentage points.

    Over six months, ten of the 18 manufacturing PMI entries show weakening. But over 12 months, only China and Brazil are worse on balance. The average PMI levels for the entire group of emerging economies in the current month, as well as for three-months and for six-months, are all just a few ticks above 50, the dividing line in the PMI lexicon between expansion of the sector and contraction. Manufacturing has been on the razor's edge of expansion for the past year.

    Among entries only Canada logs a manufacturing reading at its high on this nearly five-year period. The average reading for all entries is at about the 75% market between its sample period high reading and low reading. The far right-hand column provides queue percentile standings. They show only Canada with a 90-percentile standing or higher. But five countries stand below their historic medians (below a rank standing of 50%) among them Mexico, Vietnam, and Turkey. However, the weakest ranking countries are China and Russia; China's ranking is in its 1.7 percentile and Russia's is in its 3.4 percentile.

    The average gain in PMI levels for January 2020- since Covid struck is a gain of 2.7 points, a meagre rise for period of over two years. However, China, Russia, India, and Turkey are net lower in that timeline. Germany has the largest gain posting rise of 11.5 points, followed by Canada at 8.3 points, the U.S. at 7 points, Japan at 5.3 points, and the U.K. at 5.2 points.

  • Japan's Tankan report slipped in the first quarter of 2022 as the bellwether manufacturing rating fell to 14.0 from 17.0 in the fourth quarter of 2021. Nonmanufacturing slipped to 9.0 from 10.0. On the same timeframe, the total industry reading fell to 11 in Q1 2022 from 14 in Q4 2021.

    Weak levels for the Tankan The absolute level of the readings for Q1 2022 are not particularly solid. For manufacturing, the percentile queue standing is at 66.7% that leaves it at the border of the top third of its queue of values- that's a reasonably firm, but not very impressive standing. For nonmanufacturing, things are much worse. The nonmanufacturing percentile standing is at its 39.4 percentile, leaving it substantially below its median. The median occurs at a ranking of 50%. Together these two measures leave the total industry percentile standing at the 43.9 percentile, also significantly below its historic median.

    Lost momentum, turned negative, too The Japanese economy has slipped. The levels of the Tankan are not impressive and perhaps even somewhat disturbing to the policy officials there. A look at the sequential pattern in the table shows that there has been weakening; there's a weakening from Q3 to Q4 from Q4 2021 to Q1 2022, although the first quarter readings for 2022 stands above or at the same level as they did in Q2 2021.

    An uneven set of readings and their impact On balance, the Tankan gives us a view of the Japanese economy that shows it slipping. It has already reached levels that are not very strong by the standards of the Tankan survey. At the same time, the Bank of Japan is struggling to keep control of interest rates and the yen has backtracked significantly on foreign exchange markets. The drop in the yen is a mixed blessing as a weaker yen makes Japanese goods cheaper overseas and that provides export stimulus for the economy. However, Japan has shuttered its nuclear reactors now and is importing a great deal of oil; oil is priced in dollar terms. Any weakness in the yen is going to make Japan's energy imports even more expensive at a time that energy is already very expensive. In addition to that, anything that Japan imports from the dollar sector is now going to be more expensive.

    The final column in the Tankan table shows changes in the indexes from Q1 2020. Manufacturing is up by 22 points on this timeline but nonmanufacturing is up by only one point. Total industry is up by 11 points on this timeframe benchmarked to just before the start of Covid globally.

    Services industries Turning to the details in this report, looking across various service sector industries, only wholesaling has increased its assessment quarter-to-quarter moving to a value of 20 in Q1 2022 from 17.0 in Q4 2021. The transportation rating at -2 is equal to its reading in Q4 2021. Comparing the levels of the readings to their values in Q1 2021, we see that most of the industry responses are higher: construction and real estate are exceptions. If we look at the queue percentile standings, in Q1 2022, we get a glimpse of the kinds of businesses that have been hurt the most in the post COVID period. Restaurants & hotels and personal services scrape the bottom of the barrel with lower 10 percentile or weaker standings. Also extremely weak is transportation at a 31.8 percentile standing and retailing at a 36.4 percentile standing, along with real estate at its 37.9 percentile standing. Construction is only slightly better off at a 47 percentile standing, but it is still below its historic median. Showing some strength are services for businesses at an 87.9 percentile standing; wholesaling registers an 81.8 percentile standing. These are relatively strong readings indicating some degree of health in those sectors.

    The far-right hand column shows the changes in these sectors since Q1 2020; there is an outsized increase in wholesaling of 27 points, retailing improved by 9 points, transportation improved by 5 points, and services for businesses improved by 3 points along with restaurants & hotels. However, personal services, real estate, and construction are all lower on that timeline comparison with their assessments of two years ago.

    Outlook darkens The outlook portion of the survey weakened sharply quarter-to-quarter. The manufacturing outlook slipped to 9 in Q2 2022 from 13 in Q1 2022; the nonmanufacturing outlook slipped to 7 from a reading of 9; and for overall industry, the outlook stands at a value of 8 compared to 10. The queue percentile standing for these readings put the manufacturing outlook at its 56.1 percentile standing, slightly above its historic median. For nonmanufacturing, the 37.9 percentile standing leaves it well below its historic median; the all-industry standing is at its 42.4%, also below its historic median. If we compare the manufacturing outlook for Q2 2022 to the outlook for Q3 2021, it's lower significantly and the outlook for all industry is unchanged with the nonmanufacturing outlook being the only one that has improved on that timeline.

    In summary, there's a lot of weakness in the Tankan report. There's a loss of momentum, there's weakness across the board, there's a loss of momentum across the board, and there's a reduced outlook for the period ahead. Japan's policymakers are looking at the potential for a fiscal stimulus package which makes a lot of sense given this weak report. Japan's economy continues to struggle.