Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics

Introducing

Robert Brusca

Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media.   Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.

Publications by Robert Brusca

  • Italy's consumer confidence fell month-to-month. Consumer confidence is down 12.5% over three months and down by 14.6% over 12 months. The mean for consumer confidence in Italy is at a value of 102 so that its level of 98.3 is well below its mean. The percentile ranking of the June reading is at 28.2% which means that it has been lower than this 28.2% of the time and since the median occurs at a 50% reading, it means it is significantly below its median as well as the mean.

    Month-to-month the overall situation has fallen off sharply. Evaluated over the past 12 months compared to where it stood last month, the reading is at -112 compared to -78 last month. However, the overall situation for the 12 months ahead improved slightly with a -15 reading where the May reading is -17. The mean reading for this category is at -2 making its -15 reading (although better than it was in March 2022) quite weak and well below its mean. Unemployment expectations have fallen back to reading of 5 in June from 6 in May and from 13 in March. Household budget considerations have eroded to a mark of 16 in June down from 19 in May and that compares to 18 in March.

    The household financial situation over the last 12 months is now assessed as worse than it was back in May; the June -42 assessment is below the -36 in May and also below the -32 for back in March. The next 12-month outlook has -26 assessment in June, worse than May's -24 although not as bad as the March reading of -34.

    The environment for savings has improved a bit month-to-month with a reading of 66 in June compared to 64 in May. Future savings are unchanged at -12 compared to -12 last month and compared well to a -10 reading it back in March.

    The business index rose to 110 in June from 109.4 in May; it's only slightly below its March 2022 value which was 110.2. Over three months the business index is lower by 0.2%; over 12 months it's lower by 2.9%.

    That percentile standing for the overall situation is at 19% in the lowest 1/5 of its range for the assessment of the overall situation in the last 12 months; for the next 12 months the overall situation is assessed at a 23.9 percentile standing- better but not by much. Unemployment is at a very high 70.8 percentile standing. Clearly there are concerns of higher unemployment. The household budget has a 64.6 percentile standing, more or less a midstream position. The financial situation over the last 12 months has a 35.4% outstanding, a week result but much stronger than the assessment for the next 12 months which is at 5.6 percentile. Household savings currently are considered easy to have at a 92.8 percentile standing and only slightly harder to come by in the future at an 85.2% standing. The environment to make major purchases is at a weak 29.8% standing, in the lower 1/3 of its range. Quite apart from consumer responses, the business index has an 82.3 percentile standing; businesses are not feeling or fearing anywhere near the pressure or concerns about the current environment compared to consumers- that's quite a split.

  • The S&P Global PMI indexes weakened across the board in June; the exception to the weakening was only in Japan where services have improved month-to-month and where the composite also improved month-to-month. The U.K., France, Germany, the U.S., and the European Monetary Union each saw weaker services, manufacturing, and composite readings. This is a sharp worsening from May when the composite index weakened in the U.S., and in the U.K. with the U.K. seeing weakness in manufacturing and services. The U.S. composite index weakened on the month due to service sector slowing. Germany also was weaker in May on a weaker manufacturing sector that dragged the composite lower. The EMU registered a weaker manufacturing sector and its composite index rose in May along with that sector in France and Japan.

    Over three months composites increased in the EMU, Germany, France, and the U.K., with Japan and the U.S. showing weaker composites as well as weakness in both manufacturing and services sectors. Over three months the U.K. saw a weaker manufacturing sector as did Germany and the EMU alongside an improvement and their overall composite index. However over six months all countries in all sectors show all sector weakness -except for Japan that shows contrary three sector improvement. All countries show strength over 12 months in all sectors with no exceptions.

    The queue percentile standings show an average composite for this group of countries that is below 50, manufacturing gauges that are below 50, by a substantial margin and a service sector average that is below a 50-percentile standing as well. All sectors are below their respective historic medians (below 50) on this timeline. However, including the U.S. in this run of data makes things look worse. After leading the way higher post Covid, the U.S. is now leading the way lower with S&P PMI flash values at standings below their respective 30th percentiles. In sharp contrast, Japan is sporting queue percentile ratings in the 90th percentile for services and for the composite- but a manufacturing reading only at its 66th percentile.

    The German service sector and the U.S. service sector as well as the U.S. composite are below their respective levels compared to where they stood in January 2020 before Covid struck.

    Month-to-month, of 18 sector and composite readings, only three rose. The composite fell month-to-month on average by 1.8 points led by a 2.5-point drop in manufacturing and a 1.7-point drop in services.

  • U.K. inflation rose by 0.5% in May after rising by 1.9% in April and 1.0% in March. Inflation acceleration was far less common in May with inflation accelerating in only 18% of the categories. In April inflation had accelerated in only 36% of the categories. That compares to March when inflation had accelerated in over half the categories with the diffusion value 54.5%. Despite seemingly tamer performance of inflation, inflation continues to rise and to accelerate from 12-months to six-months to three-months. Core inflation also broke lower in May at 0.3%; in April it was up by 0.5% but in March it had risen by 0.8%.

    If we look at sequential trends, the U.K. headline CPIH rose 7.9% over 12 months, and at a 10.2% pace over six months, and logged a 14.4% pace over three months. The CPIH, excluding energy, food, alcoholic beverages & tobacco - the core measure, rose 5.2% over 12 months, at a 5.9% annual rate over six months, and at a 6.4% annual rate over three months. Inflation in the U.K. is accelerating over these sequential periods.

    U.K. inflation is clearly excessive, but the Bank of England has prevaricated in taking firmer steps perhaps partly because of this less broad inflation in April and on the lower gain for inflation in May. But the Bank of England is still well behind the inflation curve, like the U.S. Federal Reserve and like the European Central Bank. Central banks need to get out ahead of the inflation problem and not chase it from behind, and become complacent when there's some sign that inflation might be slowing ‘organically.’ Central banks have come to dwell on the idea that they don't want to create a recession and that possibly they can create a soft landing. However, they are all so far behind the curve in terms of inflation fighting; it's hard to see how they can run hard enough to catch up without doing damage to the economic landscape.

  • United Kingdom
    | Jun 21 2022

    U.K. Industrial Orders Remain Strong

    U.K. orders moved lower in June, falling back to 18 from the previous value of 26 in May. The reading for total orders is still up strongly from its 14 value in April. Export orders slowed relatively sharply in June to a ‘plus one’ reading from 19 in May; they registered a -9 reading in April.

    However, total orders remain close to their 12-month average. The current value of 18 compares to a 12-month average of 20. Export orders also are close to their 12-month average which is minus-two versus the June value of plus-one. The queue standings of orders in the U.K. ranks strongly among data from 1991 as the current reading of 18 has a 97.6 percentile standing while orders are up for exports whose plus one reading has 87.5 percentile standing. Both orders series are quite strong on this historic timeline.

    Data for inventories (stocks) show that stocks are at a +2 diffusion reading up from -15 in May as the appetite for inventories has improved. That is a bit stronger than the -3 reading for June. Stocks, however, are at a very low historic reading; the queue standing for the plus-two reading in June is at its lower 7.7 percentile standing.

    The CBI also gives look-ahead data for the next three months. Total output is expected to be solid at 20 for June, slightly down from the 23 reading in May but stronger than the 17 reading in April. The 20 reading for June is also below the 12-month average which is at 27. The ranking for the June outlook figure is still relatively firm at 79.3% standing. That means the reading for output is higher only about 21% of the time.

    The outlook for average prices fell relatively sharply in June to 58 from a 75 previous reading that had been at 71 in April. There is some tailing in the outlook for prices; the average for prices over last 12-months the reading of 62 putting the June 58 reading below the average. Although the 58 reading has fallen sharply over the past couple of months and is below its 12-month average, it still has a 97.6 percentile standing on data since 1991. The outlook for prices signals strength.

    Note the right-scale left-scale chart and the tendency for overall orders and export orders to have to tracked one another fairly closely on these two preset scales. It shows that historically there were broad, common, and consistent movements on the two series. However, in this recent recovery from Covid, we see that the domestic orders series has recovered a lot faster than the export order series. That suggests the international economy is not contributing the same kind of jolt to the domestic economy as it did in the past.

  • Europe
    | Jun 15 2022

    EMU Trade Deficit Balloons

    The trade deficit for the European Monetary Union (EMU) ballooned to 31.7 billion euros in April after logging a 17.8 billion-euro deficit in March. The balance on manufacturing trade slipped to a smaller surplus in April of €20.8 billion, down from €23.5 billion in March; however, the deficit balance for nonmanufacturing trade widened to 52.5 billion euros in April from 41.3 billion euros in March. It's the widening deficit on nonmanufacturing trade that has driven the overall European Monetary Union trade position into deficit, and it is now driving it deeper into deficit.

    The EMU deficit has weakened sharply Over 12 months the average trade deficit for the EMU is a deficit of €3.1 billion that consists of a €26.2 billion surplus in on manufacturing trade and at €29.3 billion deficit on nonmanufacturing trade. Comparing that to the 12-month average for the year 12-months previous, the EMU had posted a €20.4 billion surplus. That was generated by a manufacturing surplus of €30.1 billion versus a nonmanufacturing deficit of €9.7 billion. Compared to those averages, the current balance on manufacturing trade has lost one third of its surplus while the deficit on nonmanufacturing trade has expanded by a factor of 5.5 times.

    EMU exports Rising commodity prices are wreaking havoc on trade positions globally. The EMU area shows manufacturing exports growing at a 12.4% annual rate over 12 months, at 17.4% annual rate over six months, falling off to a 4.4% annual rate over three months. On that same timeline, nonmanufacturing exports grow 35.2% over 12 months, accelerate to a 47% annual rate over six months, and accelerate again to a nearly 72% annual rate over three months.

    EMU imports For imports, the EMU manufactured imports are up to a 23.3% annual rate over 12 months, increase to a 31% annual rate over six months, then fall back to a 17.4% annual rate over three months. Nonmanufacturing imports rise 94.6% over 12 months, accelerate to a 125% annualized rate over six months, and then log blowout growth at a 207% annualized pace over three months. While nonmanufacturing flows are accelerating for both exports and imports, it's on the import side where nonmanufacturing imports have simply gone wild.

    Germany, France, and the U.K. The lower panel of the table shows export and import trends for Germany, France, and the United Kingdom. In two of three cases, imports grow faster than exports by about a two to one margin or more over 12 months. Over three months, once again, import growth rates dominate export growth rates. France shows tighter margins between export and import growth rates although import growth rates continue to dominate export growth rates over all three horizons for France.

    Other export trends Export trends for Finland, Portugal, and Belgium show strong growth for exports. Strength for the period is evident particularly for Finland and Portugal. Finland shows a slowing in exports, but that slowing only takes export growth rates from a 37% pace over 12 months to a 28% annualized pace over three months. Portugal shows exports at a 21.5% pace over 12 months and at a slightly stronger 23.4% annualized pace over three months. For Belgium, there's a clear slowdown in place with exports at a 27.5% pace over 12 months dipping to a 7.6% annual rate over three months.

  • The amplitude adjusted OECD leading economic indicators in May continue to show weak conditions. The overall OECD index declined in May month-to-month. The index for the top seven OECD countries declined, the index for the euro area declined, the index for Japan was unchanged and the index for the United States was unchanged.

    The OECD prefers to look at its leading economic index signals in terms of six-month changes. Viewed in that way, the OECD overall index is down by 0.5%, the index for the seven largest OECD countries is down by 0.5%, the index for the euro area is down by 0.7%, the index for Japan is flat, and the index for the U.S. is down by 0.4%. Over six months the index for China is down by 0.8%. Those figures are for six-month averages; to the right of them, in the table, we see changes over six months calculated on point-to-point data and those changes also show broad weakness and weakness that has been in train over the past 12 months (two nonoverlapping weak six-month modules in the table back-to-back).

    The indicators show that growth broadly is below its steady state pace in most of the aggregate presentations. The levels of the normalized amplitude adjusted leading indicators in the bottom panel of the table, reveal readings below 100; for the month of May they indicate weakness for every country or region except for Japan and Germany; Japan and Germany are also exceptions in April. Much of this weakness came on in April since in March these same indicators show slowing tendencies in only 5 of the 12 entries in the table. However, those slowdowns were for important economic areas as they included the U.S. and China. China's 'Covid zero' policy has been a drag on global growth and has been particularly hard on Asian economies.

    The queue percentile standings for six-month growth show ranked values below 50% which means below the median for five of six entries in the table with Japan being the exception. Looking at a broader array of countries and areas and applying the queue percentile standings to the levels of the indicators instead of the six-month changes, there are only three with readings above 50% indicating values that are above their historic medians. Those three countries are Japan with a standing at its 77th percentile, Germany with a standing at its 77th percentile, and France with a standing at its 50th percentile. A few countries have standings in the lower quartile of their range; that includes China and Greece as the U.K. barely escapes that designation. The European Monetary Union has a standing in the bottom one-third of its historic queue of values.

    The OECD indicators are clearly indicating that there is a great deal of moderate weakness and subpar growth in train across these economies. Only a few developed economies are experiencing more extreme weakness such as China where it's Covid-zero policy is responsible for curtailing growth.

  • Italian manufacturing industrial production rose by 1.5% in April on a strong gain in the intermediate sector of 2% and a solid gain in the consumer sector of 1.6% while capital goods output remained flat month-to-month. Over the last three months among these three sectors, there was only one month in which a sector’s output declined - that was a 0.6% decline in intermediate goods output in March.

    Recent strength meets longer lasting breadth This strength is part of an ongoing process in Italy where 12-month output is up by 3.7%, six-month output is up at a 6.2% annual rate, and three-month output is up at a very strong 25.5% annual rate. Industrial output in Italy is accelerating across these horizons and what's more it is accelerating in each of its major sectors: consumer goods, capital goods, and intermediate goods.

    Strength in growth no matter how you cut it Over 12 months the strongest sector is consumer goods on a gain of 9.7% with capital goods the weakest on a gain of just 0.5%. Skipping ahead to three-months, the strongest sector is consumer goods on a gain of 38.1% at an annual rate, followed by intermediate goods at a 21.6% annual rate followed by capital goods at 13.6%. These trends show that Italian output has been strong in the current month, in the last few months, and has been accelerating over the last year across all three major industrial sectors. This is a very strong showing.

    Adequate to very strong standings If we rank the industrial sectors based on year-over-year growth rates, Italian performance ranges between adequate to strong. At 3.7%, manufacturing output year-over-year has an 80th percentile ranking on data back to 2000. That's a top 20% position, which is strong. Consumer goods output, running at 9.7% over 12 months, has a 97.7 percentile standing and that is excellent and extremely strong. Intermediate goods output, with a 2.0% increase over 12 months, has a 66.7 percentile standing; that's a top one-third ranking for the sector and that is a solid performance. However, capital goods show an increase of just 0.5% over 12 months; that performance has a ranking of 48.9% which puts it just about one-percentile point below its median on this timeline. Growth at the median is adequate but no more than that. So, when we evaluate the growth rates for Italian production across sectors, the bottom line is that growth by sector ranges between adequate to quite strong.

    Great results but are they sustainable? The second part to the story about ranking is that, of course, the three-month growth rates are going to rank a lot higher. And so will the six-month growth rates. Italian industrial production looks very-solid over 12 months and then, because of the increasing growth rates, it's looking stronger and stronger over these shorter periods. The question is whether Italy will be able to sustain this kind of increase in output given the challenges in Europe.

    Other metrics are not so glowing... Manufacturing PMI: The Italian manufacturing PMI (S&P Global) has been slipping during this period. It has declined from a 12-month average of 59.8 over 12 months to average 58.6 over six months to a 56.2 average over three months. The index has further slipped from February to March to April although the April level for the manufacturing PMI is still a solid 54.5 reading. What we see in looking at the PMI data is that the trends are opposite to those that we get from looking at the performance of industrial production outright. And that could be something to bear in mind when considering trend and future performance.

    EU and Istat surveys: Other indicators for Italy like the EU industrial confidence index, current orders from Istat and the Istat outlook for production also are less upbeat. These surveys show withering responses from 12-months to six-months to three-months but fail to do so sequentially – they do so only indicatively. However, the levels of the indexes generally are still strong: the rank standing of the EU industrial confidence index is strong at its 87.5 percentile. The Istat current orders reading has a strong 95.1 percentile standing. However, the outlook for production from Istat has only a 30.4 percentile standing, a standing that has been weaker only about 30% of the time. That is worrisome.

  • For the pessimists, the race is on. Who can project the gloomiest scenario? The OECD sees growth slowing. The World Bank has just released a report in which growth slows and inflation is stubborn and -gasp- is stagflation back? Ray Dalio of Bridgewater is making waves with a forecast that the Fed will have to cut rates again in 2024! Really?

    That forecast is being 'sold' as something controversial. But if central banks are hiking rates in 2022 as many are, it would not be surprising that they would be cutting them in 2024- would it? How long do tightening cycles last anyway? I really don't see the controversy, but part of the talent of being widely quoted is selling a new sizzle on an old steak.

    Apart from marketing, however, we have some news about monetary policy that should give you pause. And the drumbeat of talk about stagflation cannot be dismissed.

    Stagflation refers to a period in which inflation remains high as growth weakens (stagnation + inflation = stagflation). We experience some 'stagflation' in just about every recession as growth falls and inflation remains high. The difference is that recession tends to 'cure' inflation and then recessions end and growth resumes. The sobriquet 'stagflation' is meant to describe a longer-lasting period of 'too-high inflation' coupled with 'too-low growth.' So, the question is whether that is on offer or not. Is it?

  • Japan's GDP contracted by 0.5% annualized in the first quarter of 2022. That puts the four-quarter growth rate at 0.7%, only slightly stronger than the same growth rate for the fourth quarter, which registered a 0.4% gain. GDP growth in Japan continues to simmer down after the stellar 7.4% 4-quarter growth rate posted in the second quarter of last year as the GDP comparisons for four-quarter growth was with a COVID interrupted period of a year-ago at that time. The annualized quarter-to-quarter growth rates show steadier performance.

    Private consumption in the first quarter rose by 0.2% (annualized), a sharp step back from the 10.1% annual rate that it logged in the fourth quarter. Still, private consumption is up 2.1% year-over-year, better than the 1.3% pace logged in the fourth quarter.

    Public consumption in Japan rose at a 2% annual rate in the first quarter after falling by 1.1% pace in the fourth quarter of last year. Public consumption has been solid since 2021-Q2 when it grew at a strong 3.2% pace followed by a 4.5% annualized rate in Q3. The second and third quarters of last year relied on government spending to stabilize the economy after a pullback of -3.0% annualized in 2021-Q1. Year-over-year public spending has been steady and strong at growth rates ranging from 3.4% to 2.0% since 2020-Q4; the only exception was the weak 0.9% four-quarter gain in 2021-Q4

    Gross fixed capital formation in Japan continues to be challenged; it fell at a 5.7% annual rate in the first quarter, marking the third quarter in a row with that series declining. There are negative four-quarter growth rates for gross fixed capital formation in five of the last six quarters. Capital spending is weak and uneven in Japan in the face of a difficult international trade environment. Confidence simply does not seem to be present.

    Spending on housing continues to fall in the first quarter, marking the third straight quarter-to-quarter negative growth rate. The Q1 contraction is at a 4.8% annual rate; it's a faster contraction than the -4.5% logged in the fourth quarter although not as severe as the -6.6% contraction logged in the third quarter of last year. Housing is another sector that continues to be challenged with year-over-year growth rates negative in five of the last six quarters.

    Exports grew at a 4.6% annualized rate in the first quarter (annualized) but were dominated by imports that grew at a 13.9% annual rate - this mix generated a negative contribution to GDP from net exports. Export growth is up at a 4.6% annual rate over four-quarters but has slowed steadily from its 27.1% pace in the second quarter of last year. Imports log a four-quarter growth rate at a 7.2% annual rate in Q1 of 2022. The year-on-year import trend is a bit muddier than the trend for exports. But exports have steadily outpaced imports on growth over 4-quarters until this report.

    Domestic demand in Japan is satisfactory at a 1.2% annual rate quarter-over-quarter; it is down from the 3.6% pace logged in the fourth quarter in terms of quarterly growth rates. Domestic demand has positive growth in three of the last five quarters in quarter-over-quarter comparisons. Year-over-year growth rates for domestic demand show a 1.2% pace in the first quarter and that's up from 0.3% in the fourth quarter and 0.6% in the third quarter of last year, but that gain is shy of the four percent pace logged in the second quarter.

  • German real industrial orders fell by 2.7% in April after falling by 4.2% in March and by 1.3% in February. This is the first series of three declines in a row since January through March of 2020 when COVID struck. Foreign orders have also fallen for three months running: at -4% in April, -5.8% in March and -2.4% in February. Domestic orders have fallen in two of the last three months, at -0.9% in April and -1.6% in March. The weakness in orders is now deep and it's widespread. Having total orders drop for four months in a row, should that occur next month, would be very rare.

    Despite the severe weakness over three months, German orders are not decelerating on a sequential basis. However, German orders are falling for total orders, for foreign orders, and for domestic orders over 12 months, six months and three months.

    Recent, but severe, order weakness in Germany Orders fail to show sequential deterioration because the decline over six months is smaller than the decline over 12 months for each of the categories of total orders, foreign orders, and domestic orders. Yet, the decline over three months is severe and is far more intense than the decline over 12 months making the sequential decline calculation moot. It's quite clear that orders are deteriorating sharply and that they erode at some speed in each of these three periods (over 12 months, six months, and three months); there is something very much not right with German orders. The three-month change in orders has been weaker only 3.5% of the time since December 2000 for total orders and foreign orders. Domestic orders have been weaker over three months about one-fifth of the time. These statistic record marked weakness.

    With such severe declines over three months, it is not surprising that the quarter-to-date comparisons show deeply negative numbers. Even though the data are only one month into the new quarter, new orders are declining at a 30.3% annual rate with foreign orders declining at a 41.4% annual rate and domestic orders declining at a 10.5% annual rate.

    With these steep declines on the books, looking at the change in German orders from January 2020 just before COVID struck we see total orders are higher over this better-than two-year period by only 0.7% with foreign orders weaker by 2.1% and domestic orders higher by 4.7%. The concentration of weakness in foreign orders clearly flags the Russia-Ukraine war and the impact of sanctions because of Germany's previous significant trading ties to the Russian state.

    Sales by sector Sector sales trends paint a much less gloomy picture with sales rising from manufacturing overall in April by 0.5%; manufacturing & mining sales together rise by 0.6% with total consumer sales rising by a skinny 0.1% led by consumer durables that gained 7.3% in April and capital goods which rose by 1.4% as consumer nondurable goods sales fell by 1.1% and intermediate goods sales fell by 1%.

    Over three months, the results are less upbeat. For all manufacturing, sales are falling at a 21.9% annual rate led by a 40.3% (AR) decline in capital goods sales, a 7.1% decline in intermediate goods sales, while consumer sales are up at a 4.4% pace, bolstered by consumer durables which rose at a 14.8% pace. Over 12 months, there are declines in sales for mining & manufacturing, for manufacturing overall, as well as for capital goods and intermediate goods. The overall consumer goods sector shows a gain on an increase in both durable and nondurable goods sales. Even so, sales by sector show broad-based deceleration over three months and they clearly decelerate over 12 months compared to 12-months ago as well. As with orders, there is less of a weakening of sales over six months. On a quarter-to-date, manufacturing sales are down at an 18.9% annual rate. Those declines are led by capital goods that fall at a 32.8% annual rate and intermediate goods where sales fall at a 10.5% annual rate while consumer goods fall at a rate of less than 0.5% annualized.

    Pre-COVID comparison Real sector sales compared to their pre-Covid sales levels of January 2020 show declines overall as of April, falling by 6.5%, consumer goods sales are down by 1.3%, capital goods sales are down by 13.2%, and intermediate goods sales are up by only 0.3%. Within consumer goods, there's a split with consumer durables sales up by a solid 7.1% while sales of nondurables fall by 2.9%.

    Industrial performance: Germany and Europe We can compare German industrial performance to performance in other European Monetary Union countries France, Italy, and Spain using the EU Commission's industrial indexes also available through April. Those indexes show positive readings for Germany at +16.4 and in Italy at +4.5 in April. France shows a negative reading of -0.5 and Spain records a -1.2. These are net (up minus down) diffusion indexes. In terms of monthly changes, Germany is stronger relative to March by just a tick while the other countries show weakening between March and April with France falling to -0.5 from +1.4, Italy falling just two ticks to +4.5 from +4.7 and Spain falling to -1.2 from +4.4.

    The average readings over three months, six months and 12 months show a slow deterioration over those spans in Germany, a slow deterioration in Italy, as well. However, Spain and France present a convoluted pattern that demonstrates neither acceleration or deceleration in a clear fashion. However, if we look at just net changes from a year ago, three of the four largest European Monetary Union countries show increases with Spain alone showing a small decrement over 12 months of 0.2 points.

    The queue standings of the industrial indexes from the European Commission show firmness or strength across the board. Germany is at a very high 97th percentile standing, France and Spain boast standings in their low 70th percentile and Italy presents a standing around its 85th percentile. All of these metrics are firm-to-strong. And looking at the industrial data, changes since COVID struck back to January 2020 show positive changes. Spain demonstrates the largest change, up by 34.3 points on this index, Germany is up by 27.0 points, Italy is up by 9.5 points, and France is up by 2.3 points.

  • PMIs rise but all sectors still contract China's composite PMI rose by five points to 42.2 in May from 37.2 in April. Despite the month-to-month improvement in the index, it still refers to a decline in output in May. The five-point month-to-month rise is significant, but the index at 42.2 is still well below the breakeven value of 50 for the composite index.

    Entrenched weakness China in May registers an increase in both the services index and the manufacturing index. The services index improves sharply to 41.4 from 36.2. However, it's moving up from that very week 36.2 reading in April so that even at 41.4 there's a clear-cut decline in services activity being registered. Manufacturing fares better than services; the manufacturing PMI gains by 2.1 points on the month to a diffusion reading of 48.1. That's a lot closer to the breakeven value of 50%, but it still indicates a decline in the sector.

    COVID Zero...not a soft drink China continues to suffer from its COVID zero policy and having had substantial lockdowns across the economy. These policies continue and they continue not just to hold the economy down but to threaten its vitality in the future.

    Shanghai has reopened after two months of having shutdowns, but it's still at risk to any further infections should they crop up.

    Tariff relief? The Biden Administration is considering dropping tariffs on Chinese goods in an effort to combat inflation in the United States. The Administration, reportedly, will still be keeping restrictions on aluminum and steel imports, but it may be willing to drop tariffs on other imported items. That could benefit the U.S. inflation outlook and it could benefit China by making it more competitive in U.S. trade.

    OPEC moves but does not groove OPEC-plus has met and is going to increase oil production slightly. However, there has not been a significant impact on oil prices from this move that was largely anticipated. There had earlier been some firmness in oil prices on the ending of China's lockdowns in Shanghai. It also is reported that the Biden Administration without any new deals might be willing to 'look the other way' to let Iran export oil to combat higher global oil prices. There is no hint of the Administration cutting any slack to U.S. oil companies or to the fracking industry.

    Significant entrenched weakness in China Beyond the month-to-month changes in China's PMI indexes, there are still broadly declining. China's composite, manufacturing index, and services activity index, all show net the declines over both 12 months and 24 months. The readings for the sectors all are weak. Ranking China's PMI data back to May 2018 shows the manufacturing index has a 6.1 percentile standing, the services sector has a 2.1 percentile standing, and the composite has a 2.1 percentile standing. The composite ranked at 2.1 tells us that it has been weaker only 2.1% of the time since May 2018. Clearly this is a week set of readings for China.

  • Composite PMI data from S&P Global show broad weakening in May with 10 jurisdictions in the table showing weaker results month-to-month compared to 8 showing improvement. The U.S. and China showed the largest service sector pull backs on an ongoing basis. China does not yet post a composite value, but its composite PMI has been currently caught up in China's zero COVID policy and the ongoing rolling lockouts that have permeated its economy have weighed heavily on economic performance in recent months.

    In May, the 18 jurisdictions in the table show an unweighted average of 54.3, down from 54.8 in April but stronger than 53.5 in March. The median, however, fell to 54.2 in May, below April's median of 55.8 and below the March median of 54.6.

    The number of jurisdictions reporting composite PMIs below 50 are few and far between for all these periods. In May only three jurisdictions are below 50, in April there are two, and there are no more than two or three for any monthly or sequential interval in the table.

    There are, however, more jurisdictions that are slowing. In May 10 jurisdictions show slowing; that's a broader slowdown than in April when four reported slowing, but slightly fewer than March when 12 jurisdictions reported slowing. The sequential comparisons show that five are slowing over three months, 10 are slowing over six months, but only four slow over 12 months compared to 12 months earlier. The data on slowing are mixed although May shows broad deterioration and the median data confirmed that the slowing is ongoing in recent months. The counterpoint is that average data are less supportive of that trend.

    Sequential data also give a mixed reading on slowing if we look at the averages and means for their different periods the average PMI shows a slowing from 12-months to six-months and then just a technical upturn over three-months. The median shows a slowing from 12-months to six-months and then a revival over three-months that brings the median almost back to its 12-month value. That is very weak evidence of slowing – but there is no evidence of acceleration.

    We can obtain an assessment of performance looking at the queue standings. These are calculations that place the current composite value in its Q of data back to January 2018 expressing the result as a percentile standing. On this basis, over this period the weakest performance is in Ghana, followed by Russia, the U.S., and then Nigeria. The U.S. composite has only a 32-percentile standing, meaning it has been weaker than this May value only about 1/3 of the time over this period. Countries that have top ten percentile standings on this timeline are: Singapore, Brazil, and India. The average queue standing for the period is 61.7%; the median standing is 67.9%. These are moderately firm readings for the average in the median.