Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics

Introducing

Robert Brusca

Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media.   Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.

Publications by Robert Brusca

  • Japan's Economy Watchers index slipped ever so slightly in January to 48.5 from 48.7 in December after reaching 49.4 in November. The future index has continued to creep up to 49.3 in January from 46.8 in December and 46.3 in November. Both the current index and the future index diffusion values reside below ‘50’ indicating that current growth and expected future growth is still expected to be weaker rather than stronger. However, the decrement for future growth is shrinking.

    The rankings for these two current and future index headlines are quite similar with the current index having a queue standing at its 62.8 percentile while the future index has a 62.5 percentile standing. Although both show activity declining, the levels of the diffusion indexes are above their respective medians for the period of comparison. The data look backward over values since January 2002, a span of 21 years.

    Current Index The current index does feature some strength. Eating and drinking places have a ranking in their 83.8 percentile, household responses have a ranking in their 73.5 percentile, retail has the ranking in its 75.9 percentile, services have a ranking at their 69.2 percentile, while nonmanufacturing corporations as a whole have a 54.5 percentile standing. All of those are above their 50th percentiles and therefore above their period medians. On the weaker end of things, are the overall corporate standing at a 47.4 percentile standing, that is clearly dragged down by manufacturers with a 43.1 percentile standing. Employment overall has a 39.9 percentile standing. Housing is also weak at a 40.3 percentile standing. These standings apply to the current diffusion values. They show employment, with the highest diffusion value at 51, and yet the lowest ranking among all the components. Services have a diffusion reading of 50, but the ranking that is firm, at its 69th percentile. All the rest of the current diffusion readings are below a value of 50 and signal contraction. That just gives you some idea the nature of the period that we're comparing these values with that values with diffusion this low nonetheless read as relatively firm or strong standings when compared to history.

    Future Index The future index shows the most strength in retailing at a 76.3 percentile standing, followed by nonmanufacturing corporations with the 68.8 percentile standing, eating and drinking places at a 67.6 percentile standing and households at a 66th percentile standing. On the weaker end of things, again, we have employment as the weakest standing at its 38.3 percentile followed by housing with a 47.8 percentile standing and services with a 48.2 percentile standing. Looking at the diffusion values across the board, only nonmanufacturers have a reading above 50 and their reading is at 50.4 barely above the breakeven 50 mark for diffusion.

  • Output in Europe continues to struggle as exemplified by German industrial production, that fell in December continuing its erratic pattern in 2022. German production has fallen in four of the last six months. Annualized growth rates, calculated sequentially, show output decelerating in German manufacturing with output down by 4.2% over 12 months, down at a 6.8% annual rate over six months, and down at an 11.7% annual rate over three months. The output of consumer goods follows that same progression, and the output of intermediate goods follows that progression but with much more severely negative rates of growth. Intermediate goods are down by 10.3% over 12 months, down at an 18.4% annual rate over six months, and down at a 24.6% annual rate over three months. The exception to all this weakness and progressive weakness is capital goods where output accelerated from 12-months, to 6-months, to 3-months, and where growth rates have become relatively strong. Capital goods output is up by 3.5% over 12 months, up at a 10.5% annual rate over six months and then up at nearly the same growth rate of 10.6% annualized over three months.

    But the quarter is now finished; the quarter-to-date calculations are now for the fourth quarter. They show industrial production falling at a 2.7% annual rate, consumer goods output falling at a 4.7% annual rate, intermediate goods output falling at a 15.2% annual rate, and capital goods output expanding at a strong, 16.3% annual rate.

    Construction shows a decline in output in December, and it shows sequentially declining and decelerating growth rates with output contracting and sequentially greater negative rates from 12-months to 6-months to 3-months.

    Manufacturing Manufacturing orders are declining on all but horizons, but the declines are progressively diminishing with the 12-month growth rate for real orders at -9.6%, diminishing to -8.7% over six months, and diminishing further to -3.1% over three months. Real orders are not becoming progressively weaker; however, they are contracting on all timelines.

    Demand shows that real sales have been somewhat erratic. They are up by 1.1% over 12 months, down at a 0.2% pace over six months, and then up at a 0.8% annual rate over three months.

    Manufacturing and industry Various surveys show a slight amount of firming in the October to December period. The ZEW current index is slightly stronger for two months in a row. The IFO index for manufacturing also is higher for two months in a row. IFO expectations have been stronger for two months in a row. The EU Commission index for the industrial sector has been relatively unchanged over the past three months.

    Elsewhere in Europe… Other early reporting countries in December show mixed results. France logs a gain in output of 0.3%, Spain shows a decline of 1.8%, Ireland shows a drop of 8.5%, Portugal posts a gain of 4.1%, Norway shows IP declining by 0.6% in December. The sequential growth rates show persisting decelerations for France, Ireland, and Norway. France, while showing persistent deceleration, still reports positive rates of growth over 12 months, six months, and three months. Ireland reports accelerating contractions over that timeline, while Norway transitions from growth over 12 months to a decline in output over three months. Spain’s pattern is inconsistent, while Portugal shows strength with positive growth rates on each horizon and with industrial output accelerating from 2.4% over 12 months, to a pace of 11.8% over six months and to 26.1% over three months.

  • Canada's Ivy index move sharply higher to 60.1 in January from 49.3 in December. The manufacturing index moved up to 51 from 49.2. The employment diffusion index moved up to 60.5 from 59.5. Delivery speeds lengthened, indicating some increase in activity rising to 52.3 from 49.1. Inventories, however, grew at a slower pace on a diffusion reading of 52.7, down from 53.9 in December. Inflation expanded more slowly with the diffusion reading for prices of 63.6 in January compared to 67.5 in December.

    Over broader periods, three-months, six-months, and 12-months changes show that the overall Ivey index has moved up significantly, rising by 3.1 points over six months and by an even stronger 7.3 points over three months. In contrast, the manufacturing reading has eased, slipping to show a weaker gain over six months, falling back by 1.5 points while the diffusion index for manufacturing rose by 2.1 points over three months. The diffusion index at 51.0 (above 50) for January still shows bare-bones manufacturing expansion.

    The employment diffusion index, while remaining well above 50, the point that indicates hiring neutrality, is lower by less than one point over 12 months but higher by 1.1 points over six months and by 5.9 points over three months. Delivery speeds have slowed considerably compared to 12-months ago. They are now nearly 25 diffusion points higher than they were 12 months ago; they're also 11.4 points higher than they were six months ago and 1.5 points higher than they were three months ago. Inventory diffusion is weaker on all three horizons, indicating that inventory building has steadily slowed. On the other hand, price diffusion is lower by 14.5 diffusion points over 12 months, by 12.3 diffusion points over six months and by 8 diffusion points over three months. The step back for inflation is impressive.

    Meanwhile, the broader inflation metrics in the economy at the consumer level for consumer prices, for core consumer prices (excluding food & energy), and for the CPIx (a reading that excludes volatile items) all show inflation stepping down from 12-months to 6-months to 3-months.

    The data on ranking allow us to look at the levels of these PMI readings and the pace of inflation across a broader period back to early-2009 and put today's performance in historic profile by looking at the queue standings (or ranking standings) that position each variable in a queue of historic values. The overall Ivey index has a 71.4 percentile standing, indicating that it's been higher than this a little less than 30% of the time. After the jump this month, the Ivey index is at a relatively firm standing. Manufacturing is a different ball game with a 34.7 percentile standing; it has been lower than its current value only about one-third of the time. The median readings on these rank variables occur at the 50% mark so any reading above 50 is above its median on this timeline any reading below 50 is below its reading on this timeline. The employment reading in January has a diffusion value of 60.5 and paired with a 92.3 percentile standing, indicating extreme strength for employment. Employment has been higher than the current level, less than 8% of the time. Delivery speeds have a high-ranking, indicating that the lags for deliveries are getting longer and that conditions are still relatively tight and have been tighter only about 8% of the time. Inventories, at a 52.7 diffusion reading in January, have a 48.2 percentile standing just slightly below their median. Prices have seen their diffusion values slide consistently. The 63.6 diffusion reading for January has a 57.1 percentile standing which puts it above its historic median on data back to 2009. But a reading at the 57th percentile is not as ominous for inflation.

    The rankings for inflation itself showed that inflation at the consumer price level has rarely been higher than the year-over-year gains that are being posted in December. The headline CPI is at 6.5%; CPI less food & energy the gain is at 5.5%; on the CPIx the gain is at 5.4%. Consumer prices have a percentile standing of 94, indicating they have been higher only about 6% of the time; less food & energy prices have been higher on this timeline barely more than 1% of the time; the CPIx that excludes the volatile items has been higher about 6% of the time. Inflation remains high by historical standards on all these measures. In fact, it's breaking the lowest in the Ivey survey based on the diffusion measure for January. However, since inflation has rather substantially in January, we can compare the ranking of the Ivey PMI price index of 67.5 (from December) to its historic legacy and on the same timeline as the CPI data. On that a ranking at the 73 percentile emerges instead of at the 57th percentile and that's slightly more comparable to what we're seeing from the CPI data which are also up to date through December. Still, Ivey is pointing to ongoing deceleration ahead.

  • The composite PMI readings from S&P Global in January largely show improvements although clearly amid mixed performance. The trends are largely still weakening but January provides some pickup. The JP Morgan global PMI for example improved to 49.8 in January from 48.2 in December. The HSBC emerging market index has a PMI value of 51.9 in January compared to 50.1 in December. The developed markets index has a diffusion rate of 48.4 in January up from 47.1 in December. Despite these month-to-month increases, the global PMI index from JP Morgan shows deterioration from 12-months to six-months to three-months based on the PMI averages. The HSBC emerging market index deteriorates as well although with some mixed messaging. Emerging markets have a PMI average for 12-months at 50.2 that improves to 50.7 over six months and then falls back to 50.3 over three months. The developed markets index sequentially deteriorates from 50.7 to 47.9 to 47.6.

    Queue standings are weak with few exceptions The standings of these various aggregated indexes are also weak. The JP Morgan global PMI has a 20% queue standing on data back to January 2019; on that same timeline the HSBC emerging market index has a 51-percentile standing, barely above its median, while developed markets have a puny 14.3 percentile standing, clearly well below the history median (which occurs in all cases at a queue standing below 50).

    A breadth of monthly progress The unweighted average and overall median indexes across all the countries and the EMU show increases in January after posting increases in December as well. The number of jurisdictions with readings below 50 declines somewhat sharply in January to 11 from 17 in December compared to 17 in November. This is a count of 25 jurisdictions that includes all the elements in the table from the U.S. market composite down to Nigeria excluding the three market groups at the top of the table. Also, January finds five regions slowing compared to 10 in December 13 in November. Slowing refers to lower PMI values month-to-month. So, there has been some progress in the composites that's driven not just by large countries but by unweighted numbers.

    Still…sequential weakness However, the 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month averages show ongoing weakness on that sequence for the averages and medians for this 25-country grouping. In addition, the number of jurisdictions with values below 50 increases from 7 over 12 months to 14 over 6 months to 16 over 3 months. But the number of jurisdictions showing slowing declines slightly from 18 over 12 months to 17 over 6 months and to 14 over 3 months.

    PMI levels are uniformly weak with few exceptions There is little disagreement among the queue standings. The queue standings are weak, up and down the line. Among under 25 entries in the table, only 8 have queue standings above the 50th percentile, meaning that they are above their historic medians since January 2019. The strongest of them is Zambia with the 91.8 percentile standing (but…on a PMI value of only 50.6!). The next strongest is India at an 81.6 percentile standing, Hong Kong and Japan have standings in their 70th percentiles, Saudi Arabia, Kenya, and Italy have standings in their 60th percentiles. But the unweighted overall average standing in the table is at the 40.6 percentile mark with the median at the 36.7 percentile. These are weak readings.

  • Switzerland
    | Feb 02 2023

    Swiss Confidence Improves in Q1

    Swiss confidence improved in the first quarter of 2023 rising to -30.2 from -46.5 in Q4 2022. Confidence had previously deteriorated in the third and fourth quarters. In terms of four quarter changes, confidence is still in a broad deteriorating cycle; it's fallen by 21 points over 12 quarters, by 16 points over eight quarters and by 26 points over four quarters.

    The outlook for confidence improved sharply in the first quarter. The reading of -16.3 is up sharply from the -57.2 logged at the end of 2022. But the confidence outlook is lower by 11 points over twelve quarters, slightly higher, rising by 0.2 points over eight quarters, and is still net lower over four quarters, falling by 37.4 points. The outlook has been on a bit of a roller coaster in the wake of COVID and the uneven recovery and inflation it spawned.

    Past confidence improved in Q1 2023 at -49, compared to -59.9 at the end of 2022. Past confidence is still slipping, having worsened by 26.2 points over four quarters after improving by 45.1 points over eight quarters, and worsening by 55.1 points over 12 quarters. The 12-quarter comparison takes us back to the Q1 2020 level when COVID first struck.

    The price outlook for Switzerland has fallen to 90.3 from 104.5 as of the first quarter of 2023. Over four quarters the price outlook is now net lower down by 3.6 points; over eight quarters, however, it's higher by some 46 points, and over twelve quarters it's higher by 35 points. Obviously, inflation is still stirring. Looking at past prices, the first quarter assessment is slightly higher than the assessment for the fourth quarter at 132.7 compared to 130.7 The four-quarter change is still higher by 49.9 points; however, that's smaller than the nearly 115-point gain over eight quarters and then there is the 85-point gain over 12 quarters. These readings flag, of course, past significant rises in inflation and while past increases are still the rule the recent past has shown some improvement. And, of course, the outlook shows small declines in the price outlook – there is a progression at work.

    Job security perceptions increased smartly in the first quarter of 2023 as the reading rose to plus 1.6 from -25.1 in the fourth quarter. Over 12 quarters, assessments improved by 45.9 points, over eight quarters they improved by 124 points, over four quarters they are better by 60.8 points. Much of the improvement is very recent; COVID plays a big part and those past developments and in causing people to become more worried about their job security. Now, even with the war in Ukraine in progress, and having been in progress for a year, job security in Switzerland has improved smartly.

    Personal finance metrics haven't changed that much in recent quarters; the outlook for financial conditions shows a very similar reading for Q1 2023 to what it logged for Q2 2022 with some deterioration in between. Past financial conditions over the last four quarters have also been relatively stable. However, all the changes in financial conditions over four, eight, and 12 quarters show that there has been deterioration to some degree afoot- there is only one quarter in a row of improvement in financial conditions and their outlook.

    The spending environment has not changed too much over the last three quarters; however, the changes over four quarters, eight quarters, and twelve quarters show deterioration although a deterioration that has been slowing.

    Queue standing assessments The final column of the table evaluates the Q1 2023 readings relative to their historic performance back to 1980. On that timeline, confidence measures are extremely low, inflation measures are elevated, job security emerges as rather solid at an 86.7 percentile standing. Job security has been better less than 14% of the time. However, personal finances under current circumstances show a bottom 16% standing and the outlook has a bottom 2.3% standing. In addition, the likelihood of making a special purchase - despite solid job security - is at a very low 1.7 percentile standing. The present assessment for consumer confidence has only a 6.4 percentile standing although the outlook is better with a nearly 35-percentile standing; that's still a lower one-third-of-queue reading.

  • The table chronicles manufacturing PMI data as presented by the S&P survey across a wide range of global economies. Notably this month there is a divergence between what the S&P PMI data say in the U.S. for manufacturing and what the ISM survey says. In the table, I present the results from the U.S. S&P survey while in the chart I plot the U.S. ISM manufacturing data that show the U.S. continuing to erode while the U.K. and the European Monetary Union show monthly improvements.

    In the S&P survey, there is an improvement in the euro area as the manufacturing PMI moves up to 48.8 in January from 47.8 in December and the two largest monetary union economies, Germany and France, also show improvement in their manufacturing sectors. The U.S. manufacturing report from S&P shows an improvement to 46.8 from 46.2. This contrasts with the U.S. manufacturing ISM reading that falls from 48.4 in December to 47.4 in January.

    Turning back to the monthly S&P data, among the 18 reporting units in the table, all but five show month-to-month improvement in January; worsening are Russia and India as well as Malaysia and Taiwan. The median S&P manufacturing gauge for January is 48.9, up from 48.0 a month ago; however, the averages for PMI data from 12-months to six-months to three-months show mixed trends.

    The diffusion data for these time-sequence cohorts shows that over 12-months there are only five countries that report improved results compared to the previous 12-months. Over six-months there are four countries that show improved conditions from 12-months ago. Over three-months there are eight countries that show improvements from 6-months ago. The number of reporting units that show improvements month-to-month Vs deterioration is at a standoff in January. The median reading is still weakening on trend. The question is whether the January improvement owes to data variability or whether it's beginning of something completely new.

    While the odds-on call is still for recession in the U.S. and in Europe, there's a growing chorus of economists arguing that a recession can be and will be avoided and so data that begin to show some economic resilience are going to have some play and get some purchase in markets. And this will occur until the transition of these economies toward recession either continues and until recession develops or unless resilience builds on itself and shows that recession avoidance is a real event.

    For the moment, there's not a great deal to go on. PMI data do show some resilience month-to-month; however, as of January there are still 11 reporters in the table with PMI values below 50 indicating the manufacturing activity is still contracting whether it is improved month to month.

    Manufacturing PMI values ranked on data back to January 2020 show only five observations above their medians for this period, Russia, India, China, Indonesia, and Turkey. The rest have standings below their 50th percentile for their queue rankings with an average percentile standing at the 25.7 percentile mark which is quite weak (just outside the lower quartile). The U.S. alone has its S&P manufacturing standing as the weakest in the table at its 8th percentile; the euro area has a standing at its 24th percentile; the U.K. has a standing at its 13th percentile; Japan has a standing at its 29th percentile and so on.

    Manufacturing sectors are weak compared to where they have been (since 2019) and this has not been a particularly robust period for economic growth. And data since January 2020, when COVID struck, show that every reporting unit in the table has a PMI value lower than it was before COVID except for Russia and Mexico. Taiwan is lower by 15.9 points; U.S. manufacturing slowed by 12.3 points. No other country is lower by double digits although Germany is lower by 9.8 points.

  • China's manufacturing and nonmanufacturing PMIs have improved in January; each of them rising significantly. The manufacturing PMI is up to 50.1 from 47.0 in December; the nonmanufacturing PMI has jumped to 54.4 from 41.6. Both were on a string of declines; January signals expansion for the first time in four months. In the case of each one of these readings, it's just an increase for one month in a row and, while it is only one month both the diffusion indexes - on top of improving - (for the first time since September in manufacturing and for the first time since June for nonmanufacturing) are above 50, indicating growth. In the case of manufacturing, it's barely any growth because the index is only at 50.1.

    Optimism grows… Still, there is growing optimism in China because it has ended its zero COVID policies and that appears to be having an almost instantaneous impact on growth. These improvements are expected to continue. However, China is coming off a period of weakness as the 12-month, 6-month, and 3-month manufacturing and nonmanufacturing PMI averages show slippages over that time sequence.

    Ranked on data since January 2019 the manufacturing and nonmanufacturing gauges are above their medians for the period, both have rankings above 50. Manufacturing has a ranking-reading barely above 50 at 51.0. For nonmanufacturing it's a much more substantial position above 50 at a 75.5 percentile standing. But both sectors are responding quite quickly which isn't surprising given the nature of the zero COVID policy and this tendency for that policy to hammer at nonmanufacturing and services sectors much harder than at the manufacturing sectors as demonstrated by the large gain in nonmanufacturing in January… as the policy was abandoned.

  • EMU- Long slow slog of recovery? EU Commission indexes for January 2023 show continuing rebound for the European Monetary Union as it continues to climb from its October low. The January index for the Monetary Union rises to 99.9 in January from 97.1 in December. There are month-to-month improvements in all the components except for construction. The reading for construction falls to 1 in January from 4 in December. However, the industrial index rises to 1 from -1, the consumer confidence index reduces its negative reading to -20.9 from -22.1, retailing does the same, rising to -1 from -3 in December. The all-important services sector advances to a reading of 11 in January from 8 in December. These EMU indexes are net diffusion indexes that are the result of subtracting negative responses from positive responses to create the net diffusion reading. The headline sentiment reading is a different animal; it's an index.

  • Money and credit growth in December took a turn lower for the most part on a global basis. In the European Monetary Union, M2 fell by 0.4% month-to-month; total credit fell by 0.4% and private credit fell by 0.5%. In the U.S. the M2 money stock fell by 0.7%, in the UK (the November figures are the most up to date, and in November) the money stock fell by 1.6%. In Japan, in December, M2-plus CDs was flat.

    Money supply…back in the limelight? Different economists pay different amounts of attention to the behavior of the money stock. In recent years, money supplies haven't been written about as much as they were certainly back in the 1980s when the Fed was using monetarist techniques to try to gain control of inflation. The focus on money has gradually waned as central banks adopted inflation targeting and ‘black-box-methods’ to reach these targets. (‘Black-box methods’ refers to the fact that central banks give us no idea what process they will use to reach the target, they simply commit to the target.)

    In for a penny, in for a pound…or a euro, or a yen However, I don't know anyone who thinks that money supply is irrelevant. We are currently coming out of a very unusual period in history where money supplies boomed and have since busted. And this transition in money supply growth from boom to bust is usually believed to confer some amount of instability to the economy. It certainly makes forecasting anything much more difficult because to the extent that economic activity engages lags; there are the lags from this incredible boom period now beginning to interact with the lags from the bust. And how that interaction works out is complicated and may even be unknown.

    The current cycle defined: In this cycle, from January 2020 to date money supply in the European Monetary Union posted its greatest year-over-year growth rate at 11.4%; in the U.S. it was 26.9%; in the U.K. it was 13.7%; in Japan it was 9.6%. The lowest growth rates in the period were 4.1% for the Monetary Union, -1.3% for the U.S., 2.5% for the U.K., and 2.7% for Japan. If we take the current year-over-year growth rate of money in each country/region and express it as a percentage of these high and low readings for growth, the U.S., the U.K., and the European Monetary Union are currently experiencing their lowest money growth of the whole period. Japan’s money growth is in the lower three percentile of this range. In the case of the U.S., money supply growth is contracting at a -1.3% rate of ‘growth’ and it's the first contraction in nominal money supply growth for the U.S. in over 61 years. Certainly, that can't be a good thing. It does not seem to plow a path to a soft landing to me…

    Most do not focus on money supply… While many of us, I'm certainly one of them, tend to describe monetary policy more in terms of interest rates or in terms of real interest rates when inflation rates begin to perk up. But it's also important to keep an eye on what's going on with money growth. We remind you here this idea of lagged behavior. People may have a harder time attaching the notion of lagged behavior to real interest rate levels. But the idea that money supply booms and busts work through the economy with varying lags is more appealing to people and easier to explain. So the problem we have in the U.S. is that money supply growth boomed, peaking at a 27% annual rate in February 2021 about two years ago so if there are lags in this process it makes sense to think that we are still experiencing the lags from the boom and money supply rather than from the bust which is only now being recorded and will have its effects in the period ahead. One year ago, money supply growth was still strong: 7% in the EMU, 12.4% in the U.S., 6.9% in the U.K. and 3.7% in Japan. These growth rates place money growth in the 40th percentile of its (high-low) range in the EMU, nearly at the mid-point for the U.S. (48.5%), at the 39% mark in the U.K., and much lower for Japan at its 14th percentile. Japan should be receiving much less monetary stimulus ‘today’ from past actions compared to these other money center areas because of that low ranking. Monetary stimulus globally saw year-on-year money growth rates slow the most from their pace of one year ago around January 2022 (one year ago). More recently, the U.S. began to see growth slow sharply after July 2022; for the U.K. and the EMU, the sharper declines have been even more recent. Japan has not experienced any recent sharp changes only ongoing erosion. All four countries/regions have ongoing decelerations in 12-month money growth rates from the pace of 12-months ago tracing back to at least June 2021.

    Market focus is on interest rates However, the discussion in financial markets is all about the Fed's clustering of rapid interest rate increases and people have moved ahead to worry about the restricting effect from those increases and the increases for other central banks. Looking at money supply growth and remembering that there are lags involved, it's easy to see that whatever effect we're going to have from having raised interest rates those are going to be on the same timeline as this contraction in the money stock and they lie ahead.

    What is the Fed weighing? All of this makes the Fed’s behavior a little bit more curious since the Fed already seems to be bracing for a slowdown and wants to pause policy. But interest rates run below or at where the inflation rates currently reside. Certainly, the Fed is aware of these lag processes and realizes that there's some degree of slowdown coming ahead and may in fact be looking substantially at money growth rates. The money growth rates send more of a chill up your spine than real interest rates since real interest rates aren't yet restrictive because nominal interest rates have not moved up above the inflation rate. But the nominal U.S. money stock is declining for the first time in over 60 years, and slowing globally – be afraid, be very afraid...

    Net-net money growth has been TOO-strong You'll notice, looking at the data in the table, that the U.S., the European Monetary Union, the U.K., and Japan all have synchronized periods of slowing and weak money supply growth. Over the last three years even with the developing slowdown in money growth, the three-year annualized growth rate in money for the EMU was 7.3%, in the U.S., 11.5%, in the U.K., 7% and in Japan, 5.3%. All of these are more than the 4% it would have taken to accommodate 2% inflation and 2% growth on a steady basis. Even with its sharp deceleration, money growth over this entire span remains excessive relative to the growth these countries/regions are capable of and their inflation targets of 2%.

    The table shows that there are negative nominal growth rates for money supply in Europe and in the U.S. as well as contractions in both European credit measures. So far Japan and the U.K. have simply experienced the slowdown in money growth - in some cases a relatively sharp slowdown.

    Real money growth weakness is… unreal… However, looking at the bottom panel in the table: growth rates of the real money stocks - money supplies adjusted for the effects of inflation- show that money growth has been contracting on all these measures on all time horizons from two years and in. In the case of the European Monetary Union, credit has been contracting even longer. The only exception here is that Japan's M2 plus CD's measure shows positive growth over two years but then that does transition to a contraction for real M2-plus CDs over 12 months.

  • The IFO gauge improved in January. It has been improving since reaching its low point in September to October of last year. In January, the all-sector climate index improved to -7.2 from -11.5 in December. All the components improved; the service sector reading moved to a positive reading of +0.2 in January from -1.2 in December.

    Expectations are responsible for the bulk of the improvement month-to-month. Overall expectations improved to -18.8 in January from -25.6 in December. The current business situation, however, deteriorated to a 14.4 reading in January from 15.2 in December.

    While the current conditions index edged lower month-to-month, the manufacturing sector improved to a 17 reading in January from 13.7 in December. Also improving was the retail sector, which is the lone net-negative reading for January. It improved to -2.3 in January from a worse -5.4 level posted in December. Deteriorating month-to-month were the construction sector, wholesaling, and services.

    Expectations showed improvements across the board. However, all the expectation readings have net-negative values. This indicates that IFO respondents are still negative on the future. But they're not as negative as they were in December.

    Ranking data as evaluators Ranking data provide a means by which to evaluate the diffusion readings. The standings I will refer to next are based on the percentile position of the relevant categories when placed in their historic queues of values back to March 2005. In this system, 100% is the highest possible reading; 0% is the lowest. Percent of range data (percent of high-low values) also are presented in the table. These are very different concepts.

    The diffusion score for the climate all-sector index has a ranking in its 16.7 percentile. That means that since March 2005, the all-sector climate index has been this weak or weaker only 16.7% of the time. The sectors reported in the table are manufacturing, construction, wholesaling, retail and services. They show standings that range from a low of 11.1 for services, to a high standing of 21.9 for manufacturing. All of them are in the bottom 25 percentile of their respective queues of data. And some of them are much lower in that percentile cohort.

    Current conditions show the all-sector index, at a 23.7 percentile standing. The current index is in the bottom quartile of its historic queue of data. The construction sector is the only sector with a reading above its 50th percentile, which tells us it's above its historic median on this timeline. The construction sector has a standing at its 61.4 percentile. After that, the next strongest reading is a 41.4 percentile reading in retailing, followed by a 35.8 percentile reading in wholesaling and at a 33-percentile standing in manufacturing. The service sector is weakest, at a 20.5 percentile standing.

    The real weakness in the IFO framework is in expectations. The all-sector expectations standing is in its 8.4 percentile, the bottom 10-percentile of its historic queue of ranked data. The strongest reading among sector expectations is in manufacturing with an 11.6 percentile standing – still not impressive to say the least. The weakest reading is construction at a 3.3 percentile standing. The relative weakness in construction is not surprising, since it's the sector that performs the best right now in the current situation. Apparently, there are expectations that this performance is going to be short-lived. Survey respondents see it as having perhaps the farthest to fall compared to other sectors that are already performing worse in their current conditions.

    Performance since COVID As another benchmark on performance, we look at data since January 2020, before COVID struck. All the climate readings are now lower on that time horizon. Current conditions show all the January diffusion values are below their January 2020 levels except for manufacturing. That sector’s current reading is higher by 11.1 diffusion points. The largest drops in the current framework are in construction, which is 34 diffusion points lower, services that are 24 diffusion points lower, and retailing that is 21.3 diffusion points lower. Expectations also show across the board declines since January 2020. The all-sector diffusion index is 12.7 points lower. The smallest drop is from manufacturing, where expectations are only 5.3 points lower. That drop is followed by services, with the January expectations index only 15 points lower. However, there's much more severe weakness in construction, which is 34.8 points lower, wholesaling, which is 20 points lower, and retailing that is 24 points lower.

    On balance, the IFO readings in January continue to show weak and weakening current conditions, tempered by some improvement in expectations – that are themselves still exceptionally weak. The climate index has improved month-to-month. But the individual sectors continue to have extremely weak readings on both current conditions and for expectations with across the board much weaker readings.

  • The flash PMIs from Standard & Poor’s in January resemble a Fleetwood Mac song as they go their own way. Conditions are stronger in the EMU region as well as in Germany. But the composite PMIs are weaker in France, the U.K., Japan, and the U.S. However, for manufacturing, it's a different tune. Manufacturing improves in January in the EMU region, Germany, France, and the U.K.; it weakens only in Japan and the U.S.

    Still, we're talking about month-to-month gyrations here. The historical averages show all regions weaker on average over three months compared to over six months and most regions are weaker on their six-month averages than on their 12-month averages. Japan’s headline composite and its service sector are the only exceptions. Year-over-year changes based on average data are different, with service sectors stronger in the EMU, France, the U.K., and Japan. Bolstered by service sector strength, the French composite is also stronger year-over-year. Japan’s composite is stronger year-over-year as well, and so is its manufacturing gauge.

    Period to period changes Some of the month-to-month changes (second to last column on the right) are substantial with the German composite up by 4.6 points and the EMU composite up by 2.9 points. But in France, the composite is lower by 1.2 points, in the U.S. by 1.6 points, in Japan by one point, and the U.K. deteriorates by 0.4 points, month-to-month.

    Over three months, the German composite is up by 5.6 points, the EMU composite is up by 3.1 points and the U.K. composite is up by 0.6 points, but the U.S. is lower by 1.6 points with Japan and France both lower by one point. These results indicate fewer uniform changes even over three months.

    Standings in January The queue standings show all the observations in January, below their historic medians calculated back to January 2019 - except for Japan where services and the composite have relatively strong percentile rankings for the period. The U.S. and U.K. have the weakest composite standings on this period, in their respective 12th percentile and 14th percentile. France has a 24.5 percentile standing. Germany has a 28.6 percentile standing. The European Monetary Union has a 32.7 percentile standing. Manufacturing gauges for these regions range from a low percentile standing of 6.1% in the U.S. to a 38.8 percentile for the EMU and France.

    The big picture… In the big picture, there's still a great deal of weakness in the highly developed country area, not only are the percentile standings low but most of the reports show declines for the composite and the manufacturing and in services indexes compared to the January 2020 levels, the levels that prevailed before COVID struck. The exceptions are that all three Japanese measures are somewhat higher than that level and in Germany manufacturing is now 1.7 points higher than it was in January 2020. All the rest of the gauges are lower on balance. That finding signals no growth and in fact a step back for most of these observations over a three-year span. Among the 18 PMI readings in January for the 3 sectors across six areas, only 6 (one-third of them) show PMI diffusion readings of 50% or higher – and no reading is even as high as 51%. It’s fair to say all reading are clustered around ‘unchanged’ or lower.

  • Danish confidence improved again in January marking the third monthly improvement in a row; however, the index has still been weaker only 1.2% of the time and its history back to 1995 marking the January reading as a still exceptionally weak reading. Like elsewhere in the world, Danish confidence had been negative but really took a tumble in March at the time the Federal Reserve in the United States began raising rates. In February 2022 Danish confidence had been -3.2; in March it fell to -14.4 then quickly dropped in April to -20.9. The index remained weak and skidded to a low at -37 in October 2022, and it has been gradually improving from that low-point.

    Changes in monthly consumer component readings In January, the past and future financial situations are beginning to score somewhat improved results as the financial situation over the last 12 months improved in January by 4.7 points, building on a gain of 1.5 points in December. The look ahead reading for the next 12 months is up by 4.1 points month-to-month after falling by 0.4 points in December.

    The past general economic situation has been improving slightly from November and December and that continues in January albeit at a stepped down pace. The expectations for the future stepped up in November, scoring a strong 12.2 gain compared to a 1.9-point drop in October. It continues to improve, logging a 0.4-point increase in December and moving up to a 5.4-point gain in January.

    The development of inflation has begun to get some negative responses indicating that there are some expectations that inflation will be rolled back. The reading for December fell by 1.8 points, in January it fell by 8.2 points; these are backward looking reflections for the last 12 months. Looking at 12-months ahead, November shows a 12.5-point drop, December a 7.3-point drop, in January a 10.1-point drop indicating that there is a substantially entrenched view that inflation is going to be brought to heel. At the same time, concerns about unemployment have dissipated slightly, unemployment concerns have jumped, posting a change of 14.2 points in March, as the Federal Reserve in the U.S. was hiking rates. The next biggest increase came in October 2022 at an increase of 13.4 month-to-month but that was followed in November by a slip of 5.6 points. December then brought an increase of 4.6 points, but January now brings us a negative change of -2.9 points. Clearly Danish consumers are beginning to vacillate about whether the future offers them better or worse unemployment conditions for the 12 months ahead.

    After a string of negative changes and two-months of improvement, the backward-looking assessments on conditions for making a major purchase, deteriorated in January. The forward-looking responses, however, have improved for three months in a row, gaining by 2.6 points in January, building on a 4.2-point gain in December and a 1.7-point gain in November.

    The ability to save over the past 12-months as well as over the next 12 months shows improvements in both December and January.

    The general financial situation shows improvement of 3.4 points in January after a decline in December; that followed two months of improvements. It's hard to call any of this a lasting trend. Consumers still seem to be trying to puzzle out where things are going.

    The rankings on the level of the responses in January provide the bottom line on where consumers stand. The consumer confidence indicator has been weaker 1.2% of the time, the financial situation over the past 12 months, over the next 12 months and the general economy situation over the last 12 months all have standings in the lower 5% of their queue of historic values. The look-ahead for the economy over the next 12 months shows some improvement with a nearly 18 percentile standing; that's better than a lower 5 percentile standing, but still not impressive. Consumer prices over the last 12 months have a 97.6 percentile standing, indicating there has been a lot of inflation. Over the next 12 months, that standing is down to 25.2%, indicating that an abatement of inflation and a decline in inflationary pressures is more widely anticipated. However, the unemployment trends over the next 12 months continue to have a high 94.5 percentile ranking, indicating that there are concerns that there will be an unemployment price to pay for getting inflation under control.

    The current favorability of the environment for spending is in its lower one percentile. Looking ahead, to the next 12 months, it's still only in the 1.2 percentile of its queue of historic data. Favorability to save both in the past 12 months and the forward-looking 12-months is near its median at a 47-percentile standing. The general financial situation for households has a lower 5 percentile standing - extremely weak.