Introducing

Robert Brusca

Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media. Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.

Publications by Robert Brusca

Germany| Jul 11 2023
German Inflation Accelerates on Narrow Breadth
German inflation accelerated in June rising by 0.7% month-to-month compared to falling 0.2% in May. The HICP core rate rose by 0.8% after a flat performance in May. The pattern for the HICP inflation rates in Germany’s domestic CPI headline and core, while showing similar trends to the HICP, also shows very different magnitudes. The German CPI accelerates to 0.3% in June after falling by 0.1% in May. The CPI excluding energy rose in June by 0.4% after being flat in May. The accelerations experienced in the domestic indexes month-to-month are far below the accelerations experienced in the HICP measure.

Inflation diffusion as the arbiter The table calculates diffusion data based on the domestic CPI data. Diffusion data look across the various categories and calculate the breadth of the price increases period-to-period. The diffusion data presented in the table follow the practice for the U.S. ISM where diffusion is calculated as the percentage of inflation increases month-to-month plus half of the percentage that are unchanged. Inflation diffusion above 50% indicates that there is more acceleration than deceleration on the period. Below 50% there is more deceleration than acceleration across CPI categories. Inflation diffusion in April month-to-month was very narrow even though the headline showed that the domestic CPI rose by 0.1%; diffusion in April compared to March was only at 9.1%- extremely little inflation acceleration occurred in the month. However, diffusion stepped up sharply to 54.5% in May. This indicates inflation was accelerating in more categories than it was decelerated but by a very small margin. And this is even though, in May, the headline for inflation fell month-to-month after rising the month before. Essentially the diffusion calculation from May was saying that the headline exaggerated the beneficial trend for inflation. And that turns out to be true. In June we see the inflation metrics indicating a 0.3% headline gain and a 0.4% gain in the CPI excluding energy. But once again inflation diffusion remained at only 54.5%, barely showing inflation accelerating in more categories than it was decelerating. On balance, despite the headlines on the HICP, German domestic inflation data suggest that inflation is not increasing by much month-to-month. It sees June more as a hiccup in inflation. The HCP measure appears to be exaggerated. Supporting this view, Brent energy prices fell in each of the last two months as well.

Sequential trends Sequential data that measure inflation over 12 months, 6 months and 3 months on the HICP shows that there is a steady deceleration of headline inflation from a 6.9% pace over 12 months to a 4.3% pace over 6 months to a 2.9% pace over 3 months. This deceleration is echoed by the HICP core measure.

The German domestic CPI measure also shows inflation decelerating with the headlines displaying 6.4% inflation over 12 months, a 5.7% pace over 6 months, decelerating to 1.4% pace over 3 months. And like with the HICP core, the CPI excluding energy also shows inflation decelerating, in this case, from 6.7% over 12 months to a 4.9% pace over 6 months to a 2.1% annual rate over 3 months.

Sequential diffusion Diffusion data are calculated from the domestic CPI data. They show inflation over 3 months with diffusion at 27.3%; this compares the 3-month inflation rates across CPI components to their performance over 6 months. Over 6 months diffusion is 36.4%; this measure compares 6-month inflation rates across components to component inflation over 12 months. Over 12 months the diffusion measure is hot, showing a 72.7% pace; this compares inflation by category over 12-months to what it was across components 12-months ago. Interestingly, the comparison of 12-months to 12-months ago shows a headline of 6.4% over 12 months as of June 2023; this compares to 6.6% twelve-months ago. The CPI ex-energy is at 6.7% over 12 months currently, compared to a 4.4% twelve-month pace twelve months ago. The diffusion measures confirm and reinforce the notion from the HICP headline and core and from CPI headline as well as ex-energy measure that inflation has been decelerating and that the deceleration is widespread.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Finland| Jul 10 2023
Finland Logs a Strong IP Gain Tagged onto an Erratic Annual Trend
The year-on-year trend depicted in the chart on Finland’s IP growth shows an erratic recovery. Finland’s IP nose-dived during Covid as IP did across the world. It similarly staged a strong post-Covid recovery. But after seeing growth peak early in 2022, the pace of output expansion has slowed steadily and even seen year-on-year results flash between logging expansion and contraction in recent months.

In May output logs a 2.5% month-to-month gain after falling by 2.1% in April and rising 2.8% in March. But on the back of this monthly chop and year-on-year erratic behavior, the sequential growth rates are looking very solid, showing year-on-year output up by 1.2%, a gain at an 8.1% pace over 6 months then up to a 13.3% annual rate pace over 3 months. Still, IP excluding construction is only up at a 0.6% annual rate two months into Q2 2023. Manufacturing output is falling at a 1% annual rate in the unfolding second quarter as well - a complicating offset to sequential strength.

Utilities output is accelerating and exploding sequentially culminating in a 97.7% annual rate of increase over 3 months. But mining & quarrying output is tanking – not in a clear decelerating profile - but still falling at a 65.7% annual rate over 3 months.

Manufacturing shows sequential acceleration with output up 0.7% over 12 months, at a 3.6% pace over 6 months and at a 9.8% pace over 3 months. Still, both food-output and textile-output show weak performance.

Finland’s HIPC gauge is in a clear decelerating pattern in what is a now also common global pattern. While it is joined by deceleration in the core HICP as well, the core pace is much more stubborn with the pace slowing to only a 4.2% annual rate over 3 months. The performance of the HICP headline and core also are quite different in each of the last three months.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Germany| Jul 07 2023
German IP Falls by 0.2% in May
German IP fell by 0.2% in May as manufacturing IP rose by 0.2%. Manufacturing and headline IP both show sequential deterioration in play for their annualized rates of growth from 12-months to 6-months to 3-months. Consumer goods and capital goods output both show secular growth rate deterioration while intermediate goods show only a very minor deviation from that same pattern.

Real manufacturing orders and real sales both show more complex patterns.

The IFO headline for manufacturing and the gauge for expectations both show secular improvement from 12-months to 6-months to 3-months. The ZEW current index shows persistent negative readings, but they show progressive improvement. The EU Commission industrial index shows secular deterioration.

Other early European reporters show different results. France and Spain show ongoing sequential improvement in their output trends for IP. Portugal and Norway show sequential deterioration while Sweden shows a mixed pattern.

There are 17 quarter-to-date calculations in the table. Ten of them show negative growth in progress. Overall, German IP, manufacturing IP and real German orders log negative readings for the quarter to date. The ZEW current treading, as well as France and Sweden, log positive readings along with two key German sectors: capital goods and consumer goods.

Nine of 17 queue rankings show standings below their respective 50 percentile, a level that marks the median value for each series. The weakest percentile standings are for the intermediate goods sector for German manufacturing, the two IFO series (that are more upbeat- but from this lower ranking position) and IP in Portugal.

Twelve of 17 measures show weaker conditions in May 2023 that existed in January 2020 before Covid struck.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Germany| Jul 06 2023
German Orders Rebound Strongly in May- Without Much Consequence
German real orders in May grew strongly, rising 6.4% month-to-month with foreign orders rising 6.4% and domestic orders rising 6.2%. There are back-to-back monthly increases in total orders and in domestic orders. However, March saw even weaker orders with total orders falling by 10.9% month-to-month, foreign orders falling by 13.2%, and domestic orders falling by 7.7%. The strength in May reflects an unwinding of some of the weakness in March, albeit with a one-month lag.

Domestic vs. foreign growth trends in orders Because March was so weak, the three-month change in orders continues to be negative for Germany. Total orders are down by 4.1% over 12 months; they rebound to log a 3.2% annual rate of growth over 6 months, but then they are declining at an 18.7% annual rate over 3 months. This sequence is repeated for foreign orders that fall by 6% over 12 months, have a small 0.4% annual rate gain over 6 months and then decline at a 29.6% annual rate over 3 months. Domestic orders fall by 1.3% over 12months, rise by 7% at an annual rate over 6 months and then execute a small decline at a 0.4% annual rate over 3 months. For now, the greater weakness is in foreign orders on the recent horizon as well as over 12 months.

Real sector sales patterns Real sales by sector also show strength with gains across consumer goods, capital goods and intermediate goods in May. Within the consumer goods sector, consumer durables spending falls by 0.1% in May, the only sector or subsector to register a decline in the month.

Sector sales do not show any clear trends over the sequential period from 12-months, to 6-months, to 3-months. Manufacturing sales overall show a gain of 4.2% over 12 months, a decline of 1.5% at an annual rate over 6 months, and a gain of 0.8% annualized over 3 months. There is a 4% gain in real sales over 12 months, but over 3 months and 6 months there's not much change in sales at all. Consumer goods show sales declines over 12 months and over 6 months with a rebound over 3 months. Capital goods show growth over all three horizons at a 13.6% annual rate over 12 months, slowing to a 4.2% annualized gain over 6 months and then accelerating to log a 7.8% annual rate gain over 3 months. Capital goods sales rise on all horizons but do not accelerate. In contrast, intermediate goods sales fall on all horizons and their fall gets progressively worse as intermediate goods sales fall by 4.3% over 12 months, at a 6.6% annual rate decline over 6 months and at a 7.8% annual rate decline over 3 months.

EMU Big Four economies and EU Commission indexes The EU Commission industrial confidence gauges for Germany, France, Italy, and Spain show negative readings in March, April, and May. The monthly progression for Germany shows increasing weakness. Italy shows increasing weakness. Spain and France show less straightforward results but generally look to be on a weakening path since the May reading is weaker than the March reading for each of them. Sequentially the German industrial confidence indicator weakens from an average of +4 over 12 months to +0.4 over 6 months, to -2.3 over 3 months. France also shows sequential deterioration that gets worse as does Italy; Spain breaks the pattern with the -4.1 reading over 12 months, slightly worse at a -4.2 reading over 6 months and then logging a small improvement to -3.5 over 3 months. However, there's nothing in any of those sequences that looks like it's a real improvement. The queue standings for the EU Commission readings in May show all of them below their respective 50th percentiles, a level that marks the median since 1990.

The quarter-to-date In the quarter-to-date (QTD) as of May, two months into the second quarter, orders are falling at a 13.5% annual rate, foreign orders are falling at a 24.6% annual rate, while domestic orders in Germany are rising at a 5.2% annual rate. Real sales by sector show total manufacturing sales up by 0.6% at an annual rate in the QTD with consumer durables showing a 10.8% annual rate increase in sales and capital goods logging at a 6.5% annual increase in sales. Total consumer goods, consumer nondurables and intermediate goods sales are falling out on the QTD basis.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Global| Jul 05 2023
Composite PMIs Weaken in June
Among the 25 countries/regions reporting composite PMIs that reflect the manufacturing and services sectors of their respective economies, only four show improvement in June. Those four are Russia, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and Egypt. The domination of oil producers on the list is notable. We mark Zambia as unchanged as its data are unavailable in June. We use the May value for June only in the case of Zambia. This overall result is a substantial step-down and worsening from May when only 13 reporters logged worsening. In April, only 7 had cited a worsening.

The sequential averages show worsening over 3-months compared to 6-months in only seven reporters, a worsening at 6-months compared to 12-months for only five reporters and a worsening over 12-months compared to 12-months ago in 14 reporters.

Some weakening The month’s data are sharply weaker (month-to-month), showing much more breadth of weakening than what we've seen in some time although the PMI averages have not so sharply deteriorated. The average PMI stands at 52.1 in June and the 12-month average is 51.5. That compares to a 3-month average at 53.0; its 6-month average is at 52.3. This sequence shows improving PMI averages over shorter, timelier, periods (except month-to-month). The medians also show improvements from 51 over 12 months to 52.3 over 6 months to 53.0 over 3 months. However, in the month-to-month data, the April reading is 53.8, rising to 54.0 in May and then dropping to 51.5 in June. The median and the averages both show a fall-off in June; however, the PMI values remain above 50 indicating economic expansion based upon the comprehensive composite PMI readings.

Little contraction PMI readings show composite PMI is below 50 in June indicating contraction for only five countries; that compares to three in May and three in April. For the three-month average, there's only three weaker compared to six-months; for the six-month average there's only three weaker than over 12 months. For the 12-month average, there's only five weaker than a year-ago. While there is great concern about a coming global slowdown and potentially a global recession based upon composite PMIs, there aren't many countries or regions now that are experiencing contraction.

Much weakening in June On a month-to-month basis, there's a much more significant indication of slowing with 20 of 25 reporters showing weaker values in June compared to May. That compares to 13 in May compared to April and 6 for April compared to March. Over three months there are seven out of 25 that show weakening compared to six months; over six months there are five that show weakening compared to 12 months, but over 12 there are 18 that show weakening compared to 12-months ago. Even so, we can see that the tendency for weakening is mostly a month-to-month phenomenon that has emerged in June. It is not yet indicative of the broader trends.

Standings are weak and mixed The queue percentile standings place the current observations in an ordered queue of data back to January 2019; it shows the average standing at the 53.4 percentile mark and a median standing at the 50-percentile mark. That means that the median for the group over the period is at such a level that it corresponds to the median value for each reporter on average. There are 12 of 25 of the reporters with composites below the historic medians on this timeline.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Global| Jul 03 2023
Global Manufacturing PMIs Mostly Worsen in June
Among the eighteen reporters of manufacturing PMIs in June, only seven improve on a month-to-month basis. The table treats Canada as unchanged. Its June value is not available; for the purposes of statistics and aggregation, we're using the May value for Canada in June.

Over 3 months, 7 reporters show improved reading compared to 6 months. Over 6 months compared to 12 months, 8 reporters showed improvements in their manufacturing PMIs. Over 12 months compared to their level of 12-months ago, only four reporters show improvement: those are Mexico, Russia, India, and Indonesia.

For the most part, manufacturing continues to be under a great deal of pressure. The median reading for this group of countries this month is 47.8 on a PMI basis. However, despite the breadth of the deterioration, the median measure has not changed very much over the three horizons. In the table, over 12 months the PMI average is 48.8, over 6 months it falls to 48.1, and over 3 months it stabilizes at 48.2. All of these diffusion values show manufacturing activity declining on balance (all below 50), but declines are not getting worse according to the median statistics although they are getting worse based upon deteriorating breadth.

The ranking statistics show only five of these reporting entities with June readings above their historic medians. India has a strong 92-percentile standing, Mexico has an 88.5 percentile standing, Russia reports an 84.6 percentile standing, Indonesia has a 78.8 percentile standing, and Turkey has a 71-percentile standing. Apart from those, the standing of the other countries is generally much worse with the highest among the remaining countries being Japan at 48.1% and after Japan the next highest ranking being at 19.2% for Taiwan and for South Korea.

For some of the larger economies, the U.S. has a ranking for its S&P Global manufacturing PMI at its 5.8percentile, the euro area is at its 3.8 percentile, and the U.K. is at its 9.6 percentile. The large countries show a great deal of weakness in their manufacturing sectors; Japan is an exception.

Comparing these readings to where they were in January 2020 before COVID struck, there are only six countries that show better manufacturing PMI values in June 2023 than they had in January 2020. These are Russia that has a 4.7-point improvement, Indonesia that has a 3.2-point improvement, India that has a 2.5-point improvement, Mexico that has a 2.0-point improvement, Japan that has a 1.0-point improvement, and Turkey that has a 0.2-point improvement. By comparison, the median shows the decline of 1.7 points compared to January 2020. The euro area is weaker by 4.5 points and the U.S. is weaker by 5.6 points.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Europe| Jun 30 2023
Euro Area Unemployment Rate Is Steady at 6.5%
Unemployment in the European monetary union continues at a very low level. The unemployment rate has come down and stayed down since peaking during the period of COVID. 2021 brought the largest decline in the unemployment rate to Europe while in 2022 the unemployment rate mostly stayed at lower levels; it has since worked to even lower levels in 2023.

The breadth of unemployment declines Twelve European Monetary Union (EMU) member countries report in the table; Five EMU members show declines in the unemployment rate in May compared to April. There had also been five declines in April compared to March, and there had been six declines in March compared to February. The breadth of the declines in the unemployment rates has been slightly less than 50% in terms of the number of countries affected; however, the proportion of countries experiencing declines in unemployment has been relatively stable.

Over the last 12 months, unemployment rates have fallen in seven of these twelve countries with the declines logged in three of the four largest countries; Spain is the exception seeing its unemployment rate rise by 0.1% over 12 months.

Unemployment rates in May range from a low of 2.9% in Germany and 3.5% in the Netherlands to a high of 12.7% in Spain and 10.8% in Greece.

The relativity of unemployment It's hard to compare unemployment rates across countries because of various labor market rigidities and differences in labor laws, custom-&-practice, and local unemployment treatment. Somewhat more telling is to compare the ranking of the current rate of unemployment to the history of unemployment country-by-country, the ranking of the current statistics. We do this on data back to 1994. On that basis, only Luxembourg has an unemployment rate that's higher than its median over this period. The median in these calculations occurs at a ranking of 50%. • Luxembourg's unemployment rate level of 4.9% is relatively low among EMU members; still, it's a rate that's above its own historic median. • Ireland with an unemployment rate of 3.8% has the lowest ranking unemployment rate among all countries in the table compared to its own history. • France comes next with the ranking of only 0.9% despite its unemployment rate being 7%. • Germany is next with the 2.9% unemployment rate that ranks 1.7% among the history of German unemployment rates back to 1994.

The ranking statistics, coupled with actual current unemployment levels, give you some idea of how different unemployment experiences have been across countries. The median ranking of the unemployment rates among the EMU members in the table is 14.1% while the average ranking is 19.2%. However, the ranking for the European Monetary Union overall based upon pooled and weighted data for the same period is 0.4%. The extraordinary difference between the ranking of the overall EMU measure and the average/median rankings of the individual members, reflects the fact that higher unemployment rates listed in the table are often for very small countries with small labor forces as well as that it also reflects the fact that unemployment rates are largely at very low levels for all countries at the same time causing the overall unemployment ranking could be even lower than the individual rankings. Only the ranking for Ireland is lower than the ranking for the entire European Monetary Union. That's an extraordinary result. It speaks to the breadth as well as the magnitude of the EMU unemployment rate decline.

U.S. and Japan In comparison, the U.S. unemployment rate at 3.7% has a 7.6 percentile ranking over the same period. Japan's unemployment rate, at 2.6%, has a 20.5 percentile ranking. Clearly, Japan has been used to having much lower unemployment rates than the European Monetary Union members generally.

Comparisons to Pre-Covid Since January 2020, before COVID struck, nearly all the EMU members report that unemployment rates are lower in May 2023. The exceptions are Austria, Belgium, and Finland among EMU members. The U.S. and Japan also are exceptions. Where unemployment rates are higher, they are generally only higher by 0.2- or 0.3-percentage points, except for Belgium where the unemployment rate is higher than January 2020 by one-half of one percentage point.

European trend Looking at the chart, we can see that for Europe COVID interrupted along ongoing decline in the rate of unemployment. COVID caused the unemployment rate in the EMU to shoot up sharply and then after making some slow and begrudging progress the EMU unemployment rate came down relatively quickly in 2021 and has come down further in 2023. However, it's hard to make statements about the recovery in the labor market by looking at the unemployment rates because COVID has also worked some mischief with employment with people's employability and with labor market participation rates as COVID put the fear of working into some people who otherwise had been gainfully employed.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Europe| Jun 29 2023
EU Commission Indexes Continue to Log Weakness
The European Commission indexes for June show the overall index for the Monetary Union slipping to 95.3 from 96.4 in May compared to readings of 98.9 in both March and April.

Countries Among the 18 early reporting European Monetary Union (EMU) members, 13 show month-to-month declines in their overall indexes with one country showing an unchanged index. This compares to 14 showing month-to-month declines a month ago and to 9 countries showing month-to-month declines two months ago in April – the breadth of declines has expanded. The declines being experienced by the overall index are broadly distributed across monetary union members; over the last two months three of the largest four countries show declines in their overall country level indexes as well.

Sectors The sector indexes in June show month-to-month erosion in the industrial sector, the retail sector, in construction and in services. Only consumer confidence is improving slightly on the month. Among the five sectors, four of them have net negative measures with services being the exception posting a plus-6 diffusion reading in June.

Standings The percentile standings of the sector readings show retailing and construction with rankings above their medians. On this ranking metric, the medians occur at a reading of 50 so that any reading above 50 is above the median. Retailing has a reading in the 58.4 percentile while construction has a reading in the 77.6 percentile. However, services, the job creating sector, has a 42.6 percentile standing with the industrial sector at a 39.5 percentile standing. Consumer confidence has a 19.1 percentile standing.

Country level standings show only three of the 18 early reporters with standings above their historic median values. Greece, Cyprus, and Italy have above median readings in June. Among the Big Four economies, Spain has a 41-percentile standing, France a 39.5-percentiel standing, and Germany a 24.7-percentile standing. Italy leads the pack with the only above-medina standing at its 54.9 percentile.

Compared to pre-Covid activity All sector readings in June, including the overall EMU index, show weaker readings than those that existed in January 2020 before COVID struck. The EMU overall index is lower by 10 points than it was in January 2020.

No country is above its January 2020 level of activity. However, Italy and Greece both match their levels of activity for their overall country readings in January 2020 as of June 2023.

On balance, this performance suggests that in the wake of COVID everything remains weak while countries have been through several cycles of being hit by the COVID recession and trying to recover. The bottom line is an activity has generally been impaired compared to what it was in January 2020 and even now there have been some waves of recovery for the most part economies were damaged by the introduction of COVID and still have not been able to restore their past levels of activity.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Europe| Jun 28 2023
Slight Climate Backtrack in Germany; Confidence and Money Growth Remain Weak in Europe
The GfK measure of consumer climate in Germany slipped in July, falling to -25.4 from -24.4 in June. Climate had been improving tracking back to a cycle low in October 2022; from that point onward confidence/climate been steadily, at least in a small way, persistent in improving monthly climate until this month. The climate reading for Germany remains extremely weak with a queue percentile standing (or count percentile standing) in the lower 5% of its historic range of values.

The components for GfK climate lag the headline by a month. Economic climate in June stepped back from a 12.3 reading in May to a 3.7 reading in June. This is the weakest reading since January 2023.

The income reading weakened to -10.6 in June from -8.2 in May, although it was last slightly weaker in April 2023. This was not as sizeable a step back for income expectations as it was for economic expectations.

The propensity to buy, in contrast, improved slightly to -14.6 in June from -16.1 in May. And this measure is stronger than most readings since August 2022, although it was slightly weaker than the reading in April 2023. The propensity to buy has been stuck and a range around -13 to -15 for quite some time. The reading slipped to net negative numbers back in February 2022 and has remained negative ever since.

Other European confidence measures The table also offers consumer or household confidence readings for Italy, France, and the United Kingdom. All three of these countries showed some degree of improvement in confidence in June compared to May, where June is the most up-to-date estimate now available. The estimate for Italy has a standing at its 75.9 percentile France is much weaker at a 14-percentile standing and the U.K. is closer to the French standing at a 26.7 percentile standing. Consumer confidence in Italy has been more robust than France and the U.K. on a ranking basis for some time.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Italy| Jun 27 2023
Italian Business and Consumer Confidence Show Different Paths
On the month, Italian business and consumer confidence moved in different directions. Consumer confidence moved up to 108.6 in June from 105.1 in May. Business confidence settled back to 100.3 from May’s 101.2. Consumer confidence has been on an upswing in recent months while business confidence has been steadily eroding. Businesses and consumers are reacting to economic conditions in very different ways. For the most part, the consumer confidence survey this month is reasonably firm and better characterized as solid than as weak although it has its soft spots.

Consumer confidence for Italy in June has a 71.1 percentile standing on its queue of data back to the late 1990s. A 71-percentile standing is reasonably firm since the median for the series occurs at a 50-percentile standing. A 71-percentile standing is nearly halfway between neutral and the strongest possible reading, marking it as a very solid overall assessment.

The overall situation for the last 12 months improved sharply in June to a -69 reading from a much weaker -81 in May. The May reading at -81 was close to the mean for that reading on data back to the late 1990s; the move up to a -69 reading brings the standing to a 58-percentile mark, moderately above the median for the series.

Looking ahead to the next 12 months, the overall situation has just about the same standing at a 59.3 percentile standing and it has improved month-to-month slightly to a plus-one reading in June from minus-two in May, a much smaller improvement than the backward-looking assessment month-to-month. Unemployment expectations over the next 12 months have been deteriorating but at a slow pace; the step back month-to-month was to -15 in June from -13 in May. However, the percentile standing is extremely low at the 5.6 percentile mark. Concerns about unemployment are extremely low. The household budget assesses with a 61-percentile standing, having improved smartly to +14 in June from +8 in May, putting it back at its April and March levels. The 61-percentile standing is moderately firm.

Households assess their financial situation over the last 12 months with a 47.9 percentile standing as there was a small improvement to -39 in June from -41 in May. Looking ahead to the next 12 months, the outlook is weaker at a 26.6 percentile standing - this is one of the more troubling readings in the table. Still, the assessment of the financial situation over the next 12 months improved to -10 in June from -15 in May and the June standing of -10 compares to a historic mean of -7. Still, standing near its lowest 25 percentile is somewhat unnerving. But this may also be the result of a tight distribution of values in that neighborhood since the mean is at -7 and a value just 3-points lower drops it to nearly the lower one quarter boundary.

Household savings are evaluated at a 57-percentile standing, currently the month-to-month index retreated slightly to 56 in June from 61 in May. Future savings improved to -7 from -11 to a 99-percentile standing- extremely strong. Increases in high ratings on the ability to save aren't always a good sign because people that are saving are not consuming so this is another potential red flag in this report.

However, the environment for making major purchases currently improved slightly to -38 in June from -41 in May and it has a 46.2 percentile standing, below its historic median for the full period, but the median occurs at the 50-percentile mark, so the June reading is not terribly weak compared to the median just slightly below it.

Businesses saw their assessment fall month-to-month; June slipped to 100.3 in June from 101.2 in May. The percentile standing for the business sentiment index is at its 31.4 percentile, in the lower third of its historic values. This is quite a substantially weaker reading than for the consumer that has a 71.1 percentile standing.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
United Kingdom| Jun 22 2023
BOE Hikes Rates by 50bp as Agents Survey Remains Strong
The BOE’s Agents survey demonstrates that demand for consumer goods, consumer services and total services including exports have very strong - top 10 percentile standings. Total business services have a top 30-percentile standing. While inflation is flaring sharply, demand remains strong underlining that BOE policy may still have some ways to go to corral and reduce inflation.

Demand in the U.K. is strong, but output has a weaker standing in its 40th percentile, below its historic median. Exports of manufacturing goods are near their historic median (a 50% standing) while the construction sector in the U.K. is weak, at a bottom 10-percentile standing. Still, investment activity is rated at a still-solid 68-percentile standing.

Costs of imports, materials, and labor costs show historic standings in their top 20% to 15% to 3% with labor showing the strongest relative standing. Labor costs are a particularly pressing problem in historic profile. Prices have an even higher, top one-percentile standing: this applies to domestic prices, consumer goods, consumer services, and business-to-business services. In this environment, business profit margins are at a sub-30-percentiel standing.

The labor markets report recruiting difficulties at a 79-percentile standing and employment intentions are weaker, just below their historic median. Businesses report capital usage at only a 70th percentile standing.

In this environment with interest rates rising and inflation flaring, small, medium, and large businesses all report credit availability as challenging with low standings below the 15-percentile mark for businesses of all sizes and with large businesses reporting the most severe problem, but by only a small margin.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief
Europe| Jun 21 2023
European Car Registrations Rise Briskly in May
Car registrations in Europe rose briskly in May, advancing by 10.5% from April as registrations (hereafter, sales) had fallen 12.9% month-to-month. Sales changes, calculated from three-month moving averages, increase month-to-month by 1.3% after a 1.7% April drop. Rather than viewing May as a strong man, it appears to be a rebound month.

Sequential growth rates show 12-month growth in European sales at 20.5%, a very strong pace. Over 6 months, registrations/sales were down by 1.2% at an annual rate. Over 3 months, they expanded at a 16.1% annual rate. Growth rates, calculated from three-month moving averages, show an increase over 12 months of 23.7%, a 6-month increase at a 2.4% pace and a 3-month increase at a 3.3% annual rate. Smoothing the sales shows steadier and continued growth in car registrations/sales in Europe. While the year-over-year gain is quite strong at 23.7%, the ensuing 3-month and 6-month growth rates are much more moderate in the 2½% to 3 ½% range, annualized.

Growth rates by country largely echo the headline as Germany, Italy, Spain, and the U.K. all show positive growth rates in May that are recovering from declines in April. France shows a 0.6% gain in May following a 1.2% rise in April, scoring 2 gains in a row but on much more moderate changes than those reported in other countries.

Sequential gains by country reveal extremely strong gains in Germany, Italy, and France, where the German three-month growth rate annualizes to 66.9%, France to 32.1%, and Italy to 23.4%. These contrast with Spain where there's a 20.3% decline in registrations and the U.K. that has a 48.5% decline in registrations at an annual rate over 3 months.

Sequential patterns show indeterminate or complex results for Germany, France, and Italy. All three cases demonstrate growth rates over 12 months near or over 20% and slip over 6 months only to rebound over 3 months to growth rates nearly as strong or at a stronger pace than they posted over 12 months. France is again the more unusual case as its growth rates are steady and accelerating with a 6-month fall back in growth that's minor in nature as growth is 18.5% over 6 months compared to 22.6% over 12 months and then advancing at a 32.1% annual rate over 3 months. Spain and the U.K., however, show clear decelerations in growth from 12-months to 6-months to 3-months with both posting double-digit declines over 3 months annualized.
by:Robert Brusca
|in:Economy in Brief