Recent Updates
- Spain: Quarterly Nonfinancial Accounts for Institutional Sectors (Q1)
- Bosnia: GDP by Industry (Q1)
- Turkey: Electricity Production and Demand (May)
- France: HH Consumption of Manufactured Goods (May)
- Turkey: Electricity Statistics (May)
- more updates...
Economy in Brief
U.S. Mortgage Applications Continued to Rise, but only Slightly
The Mortgage Bankers Association reported that mortgage applications edged up 0.7% w/w...
Globally Money Supply Slows or Contracts in Real Terms
Money supply trends show that slowing is widespread across the major monetary center countries...
U.S. Consumer Confidence Deteriorates Further in June
The Conference Board's Consumer Confidence Index weakened 4.4% (-23.4% y/y) in June...
U.S. FHFA House Prices Continued to Rise in April
The FHFA House Price Index increased 1.6% during April...
U.S. Advance Trade Deficit Narrowed Slightly in May
The advance estimate of the U.S. international trade deficit in goods narrowed to $104.3 billion in May...
Viewpoints
Commentaries are the opinions of the author and do not reflect the views of Haver Analytics.
by Joseph G. Carson ([email protected]) March 11, 2019
President Trump's 2020 budget proposal has many story lines, but the main story is the "chaos" in the numbers. Not only do the economic forecasts appear to be overly optimistic when compared to consensus estimates, they contradict two of the basic tenets of the Administration's fiscal strategy in that "tax cuts will produce faster growth" and "tax cuts will pay for themselves in the longer run."
At first glance, the 2020 budget does appear to adhere to the story line that tax cuts generate faster growth. After recording 2.9% growth in 2018, the Administration confidently predicts 3%, or a little better, until 2024 and then growth inching down to 2.9% in 2025 and 2.8% thereafter.
Yet, what is confusing about the economic forecasts is that the Administration is predicting as much growth in 2025 as what occurred in 2018, but last's year economic growth was boosted by business and individual tax cuts and in 2025 individual tax cuts expire and full expensing of business equipment had already expired in 2024.
So the question the Administration needs to answer, "Do tax cuts trigger faster growth, or don't they? " Their own economic forecasts contradict their main argument on tax cuts as they are forecasting as much growth when taxes rise as when they fall.
The other controversial issue is how the faster growth scenario generates more revenue growth. Again, here too the Administration's forecast on revenue runs counter to their basic premise. To be sure, in 2017, the year before tax cuts took effect, revenue as percent of GDP hit 17.4%. And according to the Administration's forecast that ratio of revenue to GDP is not reached again until 2024.
Yet, reaching that revenue threshold in 2024 is not because of economic growth, but instead it's due to a double-digit surge in corporate tax payments as the full expensing of business equipment expires. The ratio of revenue to GDP moves up even more so in 2025, jumping to 17.6%, as the tax rates on individuals reverse back to levels that existed in 2017.
So a fair read of the Administration's economic and budget forecasts is that tax cuts don't generate faster growth and tax increases lower the deficits. Confused? So am I.
Viewpoint commentaries are the opinions of the author and do not reflect the views of Haver Analytics.