Recent Updates
- US: BEA Auto Sales (Jun)
- Canada: Building Permits (May)
- Israel: Foreign Exchange Exposure and Transactions (May)
- Consumer Confidence (Jun)
- South Africa: Fuel Prices (May)
- more updates...
Economy in Brief
U.S. Construction Spending Unexpectedly Dips in May After Seven Straight Monthly Rises
The value of construction put-in-place ticked down 0.1% m/m (+9.7% y/y) in May...
Developed Economies Manufacturing Sectors Hit Hard in June
Among the 18 countries in the table that report manufacturing PMI data in June, only four show m/m improvements...
U.S. Income Gained, Spending Slowed in May
Personal income growth remained solid while household spending slowed in May...
U.S. Chicago Business Barometer Falls Back in June to the Lowest Level since Aug. '20
The ISM-Chicago Purchasing Managers Business Barometer fell to 56.0...
U.S. Unemployment Claims Edged Down
Initial claims for unemployment insurance filed in the week ended June 25 declined by 2,000 to 231,000...
Viewpoints
Commentaries are the opinions of the author and do not reflect the views of Haver Analytics.
by Charles Steindel July 25, 2018
The Philadelphia Federal Reserve’s state coincident indexes show some dispersion in growth across the nation. Since June 2017, comparable to the payroll employment numbers, growth has apparently been most rapid in the West, with New Mexico reporting the strongest gain. California and Texas also had outsized growth. On the weak side, two smaller (economically) energy-producing states, Alaska and West Virginia, were unusually low, as was Michigan (North Dakota’s increase of 2.3% was only moderately less than the national gain of 2.8%).
The sense that there has been some dispersion is magnified in looking at shorter periods. Over the three months ending in June, the index declined in Alaska, Kentucky, and Alabama, while eleven states saw increases of more than 1.25%. The indexes for ten states fell from May to June, while ten states saw increases of more than .5% in that month.
The state coincident indexes are largely based on information from the payroll survey reports. Revisions in the payroll numbers will prompt changes in the coincident indexes, so one should not take away too much from the most recent monthly changes. Moreover, the trends in these indexes are benchmarked to state GDP numbers. As everybody knows, the benchmark revision of the national GDP data will be released on Friday; the associated benchmark revision of the state GDP figures will not appear until November. Thus, there will be a certain inherent inconsistency between the state coincident numbers and GDP over the next few months. Still, the general impression that the expansion is by no means uniform across the nation is likely to remain valid.