Recent Updates

  • Korea: CPI (Jul)
  • US: Autodata Vehicle Sales (Jul), Construction (Jun)
  • Italy: Ita-coin, Passenger Car Registrations (Jul)
  • Global Manufacturing Sector PMI (Jul)
  • more updates...

Economy in Brief

Although Stresses Vary, All States Endure Doubling Of Unemployment
by Tom Moeller November 23, 2009

Overall, the U.S. unemployment rate touched 10.2% during October, just shy of the 10.8% postwar-record reached in December 1982. That, however, understates the severity of joblessness. In virtually all 50 states, since 2007 there has been a doubling of the unemployment rate. Currently, unemployment rates range from the high of 15.1% in Michigan to the low of 4.2% in North Dakota. The jobless rate may even rise further as it did after the last two recessions ended when the labor force increased faster than employment. Conversely, a "double-dip" recession this time, as some foresee, would raise unemployment significantly higher.

Michigan tops the list of states with the highest unemployment rate. (See table.) With its large exposure to the auto industry, Michigan saw its unemployment rate more-than-double to 15.1%. Since early last year, the number of unemployed in Michigan also has doubled to 733,000.Last month's cash-for-clunkers vehicle sales incentive program briefly stemmed the increase, but only a sustained rise in sales will encourage vehicle manufacturers to increase hiring.

Amongst other large states, California has suffered the enormously. The downturn in the high-tech sector and red-ink in the state's budget has caused the unemployment rate also to more-than-double to 12.5% from its low, but that understates the severity of the situation. With its larger population, the rate increase represents a 1.4 million gain in the number of unemployed.In Florida, the severity of the unemployment rate's near-tripling to 11.2% is due to a depressed tourism industry and reduced construction activity. The number of unemployed rose by three-quarters of a million persons. In Ohio, employment also relies heavily on the auto industry though some stabilization is provided by the food-processing industry and Wal-Mart's headquarters. Thus, the near-doubling of its unemployment rate to 10.5% from last year reflects lower motor vehicle production and an increase of roughly 300,000 in the number unemployed.

Perhaps a more diverse pool of industries has helped those states with unemployment rates lower than the national average. In Texas, with 12.1 million in the labor force, the strength in oil prices and the stability of the food industry have held the unemployment rate below the national average. Nevertheless, the number of unemployed has risen by one-half million since its 2007 low and the jobless rate has nearly doubled to 8.3%. In Massachusetts, with the workforce heavily exposed to the education & government sectors, the unemployment rate also has held below the national average at 8.9%. Virginia also has its disproportionate exposure to the government sector to help explain a relatively low unemployment rate of 6.6% last month. Nevertheless, the number of unemployed has doubled by 160,000.

Agriculture is the mainstay of North Dakota's economy which has enabled its unemployment rate to remain the lowest in the country. Nevertheless, at 4.2% the rate is up from the 3.0% low as the number of unemployed rose by one-quarter to 15,100 from last year. In Nebraska, unemployment also remained low due to a large agriculture sector as well as large education & health sectors.

Currently, the National Association of Business Economists forecasts 3.0% growth in the economy for 2010. That would result in little, if any, reduction in the unemployment rate since 3.0% barely exceeds the economy's growth potential. Some near-term boost to GDP growth could always occur due to a rebound in inventories, which have been depressed, or from heightened government spending, a sure bet. However, the more potent source for a quicker recovery would be consumer spending, but two factors suggest that a sustained boost is unlikely. For one, too much debt accumulation caused the savings rate to crater from 1980 through 2008. It only recently has edged higher. Secondly, the aging of the big-spending, baby-boom generation as a percent of the total has been underway for more than ten years and will continue. That means less force behind purchases of homes and consumer durables. Thus, relatively high unemployment rates seem likely for the foreseeable future.

The data used in this report can be found in Haver's EMPLR and USECON databases.

The long and large decline in state employment growth volatility from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia can be found here.

Unemployment (%)  October September August Oct. '08 2008 2007 2006 
  Selected Highest States
   Michigan 15.1 15.3 15.2 9.1 8.4 7.1 6.9
   Nevada 13.0 13.3 13.2 7.7 6.7 4.7 4.3
   California 12.5 12.3 12.3 8.0 7.2 5.4 4.9
   South Carolina 12.1 11.7 11.4 7.8 6.9 5.6 6.3
   Florida 11.2 11.1 10.8 6.9 6.2 4.1 3.4
   Ohio 10.5 10.1 10.8 6.9 6.5 5.6 5.4
U.S. Average 10.2 9.8 9.7 6.6 5.8 4.6 4.6
 Selected Lowest States
   Indiana 9.8 9.7 9.9 6.4 5.9 4.6 5.0
   Massachusetts 8.9 9.3 9.1 5.8 5.3 4.5 4.8
   Texas  8.3 8.2 8.0 5.3 4.9 4.4 5.0
   Maryland 7.3 7.2 7.1 4.8 4.4 3.5 3.8
   Virginia 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.3 4.0 3.0 3.0
   Nebraska 4.9 4.9 5.0 3.6 3.3 3.0 3.0
   North Dakota 4.2 4.1 4.3 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.2
large image