Recent Updates
- Ivory Coast: Public Finance (May)
- Kyrgyz Republic: Remittances (Jun)
- Canada: Retail Trade (Jun)
- Ukraine: Import and Export Indexes (Jun)
- Jordan: Exchange Rates (Jul)
- more updates...
Economy in Brief
Japan's Inflation Shows Mixed Gains
Japan's inflation rose by 0.4% in July...
U.S. Existing Home Sales Continue to Fall in July
Existing home sales declined 5.9% (-20.2% y/y) in July to 4.810 million units...
U.S. Index of Leading Indicators Fell Again in July
The Conference Board's Composite Leading Economic Indicators Index fell 0.4% m/m...
U.S. Philly Fed General Activity Index Back to Positive Reading in August
The current general activity diffusion index rose nearly 19 points in August to 6.2...
U.S. Unemployment Claims Slightly Lower
Initial claims for unemployment insurance went down 2,000 in the week ended August 13 to 250,000...
Viewpoints
Commentaries are the opinions of the author and do not reflect the views of Haver Analytics.
by Tom Moeller U.S. Leading Economic Indicators Fell Again July 19, 2007
The composite index of leading economic indicators fell 0.3% last month and reversed all of the modest 0.2% increase during May.
During the last ten years there has been a 59% correlation between the y/y change in the leading indicators and the lagged change in real GDP.
The breadth of one month gain amongst the 10 components of the leading index fell to 45% after a 55% rise amongst the leaders components during May.
Higher initial claims for unemployment insurance and lower building permits accounted for most the leaders decline. Higher capital goods orders and a less narrow interest rate spread offset some of those negative influences.
The method of calculating the contribution to the leading index from the spread between 10 year Treasury securities and the Fed funds rate has been revised. A negative contribution will now occur only when the spread inverts rather than when declining as in the past. More details can be found here.
The leading index is based on eight previously reported economic data series. Two series, orders for consumer goods and orders for capital goods, are estimated.
The coincident indicators increased 0.2% after a 0.1% rise during May. Over the last ten years there has been a 91% correlation between the y/y change in the coincident indicators and real GDP growth.
The lagging index rose 0.5%. As a result the ratio of coincident to lagging indicators (a measure of economic excess) fell. Visit the Conference Board's site for coverage of leading indicator series from around the world.
On Forecasting Future Monetary Policy: Has Forward-Looking Language Mattered? from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco can be found here.Business Cycle Indicators | June | May | Y/Y | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leading | -0.3% | 0.2% | -0.2% | 1.2% | 2.5% | 7.1% |
Coincident | 0.2% | 0.1% | 1.8% | 2.5% | 2.1% | 2.0% |
Lagging | 0.5% | 0.3% | 3.1% | 3.0% | 3.5% | 0.6% |