Recent Updates

  • Italy: **Italy Industrial Production Rebased to 2015=100**
  • **Turkey Retail Sales Rebased to 2015=100**
  • Hungary: Foreign Currency Liquidity (Feb)
  • Norway: MOnetary Aggregates (Jan)
  • Japan: Real Trade Indexes, International Trade (Prelim-Feb), Flow of Funds (Q4)
  • New Zealand: Performance of Services Index, Composite PMI (Feb)
  • Thailand: Rice Exports Prices (Feb); China: IP Value Added by Region, 70 City Property Prices, Foreign Exchange Settlement
  • more updates...

Economy in Brief

   Leading Diffusion and Coincident Composite Indicators in Japan Give Mixed Signals
by Louise Curley February 6, 2007

Japan's Cabinet Office released today preliminary diffusion and composite indexes of business cyclical developments for December. Final figures will be released on February 16, one day after the release of data for the fourth quarter GDP.

Diffusion indexes aggregate the direction of changes in selected series that indicate a phase of the business cycle--leading, coincident and lagging. (The leading, coincident and lagging series are shown in the Composite Indexes in the Indexes of Business Cycles in Haver's JAPAN data base.) A diffusion index number below 50% is a sign that the economy may slow in three to six months. The leading diffusion index is not, however, by itself, a particularly good forecaster of Gross National Product. In the first chart the leading diffusion index aggregated on a quarterly basis is shown with GDP. The correlation between the two series is a mere 22%.

Composite indexes aggregate the percentage changes in the selected series to indicate the volume of economic activity. When the composite coincident index is rising, the economic cycle is considered to be in the expansion phase, and when declining, in the contraction phase.The Cabinet Office suggests that because of the volatility in all the series, that one should use three month moving averages. On this basis the year to year change in the composite coincident index appears to be a better indicator of the year to year changes in GDP as can be seen in the second chart, where the correlation between the two series is 77%..The leading diffusion index is signaling caution. Although the index increased in December to 25% from 18.2% in November, it marked the second month that the index was below 50%. Except for October when the index was 54.5%, the index has been below 50% in last half of 2006 and on a three month average basis, the index has been below 50 since July, 2006. The composite coincident index, however, suggests that the economy is still in the expansion phase. Although this indicator dipped slightly in December to 113.4 from 113.5, on a three month average basis, it rose from 112.8 in November to 113.3 in December. The three month moving averages of the leading diffusion index and the coincident composite index are shown in the third chart. Even on a three month moving average, the leading diffusion index is still highly volatile, suggesting that its use in forecasting GDP may entail a wider band of error than the use of the composite coincident indicator.

Dec  06 Nov 06 Dec 05 M/M DIF Y/Y DIF 2006 2005 2004
Diffusion Indexes (%)
  Leading 25.0 18.2 66.7 6.8 -11.7 49.1 55.2 58.0
  Coincident 61.1 65.0 90.9 -3.9 -29.8 66.4 71.6 61.4
  Lagging 50.0 60.0 66.7 -10. -16.7 64.3 72.2 77.8
Composite Indexes (2000=100)
  Leading 102.5 104.2 104.8 -1.7 -2.3 105.5 102.8 103.0
  Coincident 113.4 113.5 110.9 -0.1 7.5 111.6 107.7 105.2
  Lagging 124.3 126.2 120.5 -1.9 3.8 124.6 119.7 114.2
large image