U.S. Leading Economic Indicators Better
November 20, 2006
By Tom Moeller
· During the last ten years there has been a 59% correlation between the y/y change in the leading indicators and the lagged change in real GDP. · The breadth of one month gain amongst the 10 components of the leading index improved to 60%, the best since June. · Higher stock prices, improved
consumer sentiment, and especially a higher money supply offset lower
building permits and weaker vendor performance to generate the leader's
increase last month. · The method of calculating the contribution to the leading index from the spread between 10 year Treasury securities and the Fed funds rate has been revised. A negative contribution will now occur only when the spread inverts rather than when declining as in the past. More details can be found here. · The leading index is based on eight previously reported economic data series. Two series, orders for consumer goods and orders for capital goods, are estimated. · The coincident indicators increased 0.1% after an upwardly revised 0.2% increase during September. Over the last ten years there has been a 91% correlation between the y/y change in the coincident indicators and real GDP growth. · The lagging indicators increased 0.2% for the second month as the average duration of unemployment lengthened. The ratio of coincident to lagging indicators, which is a measure of actual economic performance versus excess, fell after three consecutive months of increase. · Visit the Conference Board's site for coverage of leading indicator series from around the world.
|
| Business Cycle Indicators |
October |
September |
Y/Y |
2005 | 2004 | 2003 |
| Leading | 0.2% | 0.4% | 1.0% | 2.3% | 7.4% | 5.0% |
| Coincident | 0.1% | 0.2% | 2.7% | 2.2% | 2.5% | 0.4% |