· Nearly all segments of Japanese business had better results
than they anticipated in the Bank of Japan's quarterly "TANKAN"
Survey. Most notably, the large manufacturing firms, which constitute the
closely watched "headline" group, saw their diffusion index gain 2
points from September to +21, the highest since a year ago and comparing
favorably to the reading of +18 forecast by those companies last quarter.
Large nonmanufacturing companies also saw a better-than-expected outturn, +17,
against +16 forecast and a +15 actual in September. These businesses are
circumspect about the coming quarter, however, with forecasts for March of +19
for manufacturers, down 2 points, and +17 for nonmanufacturers, a steady
reading.
· By industry, for large firms in the current survey, the margin of actual results over expectations was favorable in nearly areas; only food production, lumber and electrical machinery failed to beat their own forecasts. Shipbuilding, motor vehicles and paper eased somewhat this quarter from their actual results in Q3, although by less than they had forecast. For nonmanufacturing firms, eight of 11 saw improvement over the Q3 results and six of 11 beat their forecasts for this quarter; one, leasing, just met its forecast, which called for a 3 point rise.
· Among medium-sized firms (capital ¥100
million to under ¥1,000 million), manufacturers gained to +9, an improvement of
3 points over their forecast and 4 points over their September results.
Even so, they too look for a rollback over the winter to +6 for March.
Other businesses in the size category didn't fare as well as forecast, seen in
the table below, but conversely, they expected to improve this coming
quarter. Small businesses remain mired in recessionary conditions
generally, but manufacturers in this segment turned in a respectable +7 for the
current quarter, and while still negative, small nonmanufacturing companies
experienced much less deterioration than they anticipated.
· As we call to your attention frequently, this survey was dramatically reorganized two years ago, most significantly changing the very definition of "size" from employee-based to capital-based. Thus, for example, firms counted as "small" before because they employed fewer than 300 people might now be "large" because they have substantial capital; this is particularly true for high-tech companies. Thus, we continue to separate data for the two periods in the survey in our JAPAN database. However, in G10, where we include some customized series that we calculate, we show a long history for "all firms", which would not have been affected by the modified size criterion. That series, seen in the second graph, was +5 this quarter, the highest reading since Q1 1992, nearly 14 years ago. This suggests, as discussed here Monday by Louise Curley, that the recent downward revision to GDP growth for Q3 was merely a transitory adjustment and not the start of a significant deterioration in the Japanese economy.