U.S. Leading Economic Indicators Down
December 20, 2007
By Tom Moeller
· During the last ten years there has been a 59% correlation between the y/y change in the leading indicators index and the lagged change in real GDP. · The breadth of one month gain amongst the 10 components of the leading index remained quite low at 30.0%. Over a six month period, the breadth of gain amongst the leaders components was 50% for the third month in a row. · Last month, virtually all of the leader's components fell significantly except hours worked and vendor performance. · The method of calculating the contribution to the leading index from the spread between 10 year Treasury securities and the Fed funds rate has been revised. A negative contribution will now occur only when the spread inverts rather than when declining as in the past. More details can be found here. · The leading index is based on eight previously reported economic data series. Two series, orders for consumer goods and orders for capital goods, are estimated. · The coincident indicators recovered 0.2% after a downwardly revised 0.1% dip in October. Over the last ten years there has been a 86% correlation between the y/y change in the coincident indicators and real GDP growth. · The lagging index rose firmly for
the fourth consecutive month due mostly to a higher CPI and higher
C&I loans. The ratio of coincident to lagging indicators (a measure
of economic excess) was unchanged at the lowest level since 1991.
|
|
November |
October |
Y/Y |
2006 |
2005 |
2004 |
|
|
Leading |
-0.4% |
-0.5% |
-0.9% |
1.2% |
2.5% |
7.1% |
|
Coincident |
0.2% |
-0.1% |
1.7% |
2.5% |
2.1% |
2.0% |
|
Lagging |
0.2% |
0.3% |
2.8% |
3.0% |
3.5% |
0.6% |