U.S. Leading Economic Indicators Down

December 20, 2007

By Tom Moeller

· For November, the Conference Board reported that the composite index of leading economic indicators fell by 0.4% after an unrevised 0.5% decline during October. A 0.3% decline had been expected.  

· During the last ten years there has been a 59% correlation between the y/y change in the leading indicators index and the lagged change in real GDP.

· The breadth of one month gain amongst the 10 components of the leading index remained quite low at 30.0%. Over a six month period, the breadth of gain amongst the leaders components was 50% for the third month in a row. 

· Last month, virtually all of the leader's components fell significantly except hours worked and vendor performance.

· The method of calculating the contribution to the leading index from the spread between 10 year Treasury securities and the Fed funds rate has been revised. A negative contribution will now occur only when the spread inverts rather than when declining as in the past. More details can be found here.

· The leading index is based on eight previously reported economic data series. Two series, orders for consumer goods and orders for capital goods, are estimated. 

· The coincident indicators recovered 0.2% after a downwardly revised 0.1% dip in October. Over the last ten years there has been a 86% correlation between the y/y change in the coincident indicators and real GDP growth.

· The lagging index rose firmly for the fourth consecutive month due mostly to a higher CPI and higher C&I loans. The ratio of coincident to lagging indicators (a measure of economic excess) was unchanged at the lowest level since 1991.

· Visit the Conference Board's site for coverage of leading indicator series from around the world.

 

Business Cycle Indicators

November

October

Y/Y

2006

2005

2004

Leading

-0.4%

-0.5%

-0.9%

1.2%

2.5%

7.1%

Coincident

0.2%

-0.1%

1.7%

2.5%

2.1%

2.0%

Lagging

0.2%

0.3%

2.8%

3.0%

3.5%

0.6%

Commentary Archive