U.S. Leading Economic Indicators Fell Again
November 21, 2007
By Tom Moeller
· During the last ten years there has been a 59% correlation between the y/y change in the leading indicators index and the lagged change in real GDP. · The breadth of one month gain amongst the 10 components of the leading index again collapsed to 30.0% from the revised 60% during September. Over a six month period, the breadth of gain amongst the leaders components was 50% for the second month in a row. · Last month, virtually all of the leader's components fell significantly except new orders for consumer goods, M2 and stock prices which made very modest positive contributions. · The method of calculating the contribution to the leading index from the spread between 10 year Treasury securities and the Fed funds rate has been revised. A negative contribution will now occur only when the spread inverts rather than when declining as in the past. More details can be found here.
· The coincident indicators was unchanged for the first month since a slight decline in January. Over the last ten years there has been a 86% correlation between the y/y change in the coincident indicators and real GDP growth. · The lagging index rose firmly for
the third consecutive month mostly due to higher C&I loans. The
ratio of coincident to lagging indicators (a measure of economic excess)
fell for the fifth month in the last six to the lowest level since 1991.
|
|
October |
September |
Y/Y |
2006 |
2005 |
2004 |
|
|
Leading |
-0.5% |
-0.1% |
-0.5% |
1.2% |
2.5% |
7.1% |
|
Coincident |
0.0% |
0.2% |
1.7% |
2.5% |
2.1% |
2.0% |
|
Lagging |
0.3% |
0.4% |
3.3% |
3.0% |
3.5% |
0.6% |