Leading Indicators Down Again
November 18, 2004
By Tom Moeller
· Six-month growth in the leaders of -1.4% was the weakest since mid-2002 and does not herald firm economic growth. Negative growth in excess of 2.5% preceded past periods when the US economy entered recession. · Three quarters of the 10 components of the leading index fell over a one month span with a narrower yield curve, lower consumer expectations and slower money supply growth providing the largest negative influences. Over a six month span 65% of the leaders fell. · The leading index is based on eight previously reported economic data series. Two series, orders for consumer goods and orders for capital goods, are estimated. · The coincident indicators rose 0.3% and the six-month growth rate held at 2.1%, down from the high of 3.3% early this year. During the last ten years there has been an 82% correlation between the six month growth in the coincident indicators and two quarter growth in real GDP. · The lagging indicators rose for the second consecutive month. The ratio of the coincident to the lagging indicators, a measure of how the economy is performing relative to its excesses, rose slightly but has moved sideways since the Spring. · Visit the Conference Board's site for coverage of leading indicator series from around the world. · "Monetary Policy and Inflation Dynamics" from the Federal Reserve Board can be found here. · "A Neutral Fed Funds Rate?" from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis is available here.
|
| Business Cycle Indicators |
Oct |
Sept |
6-Month Chg |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
| Leading | -0.3% | -0.3% | -1.4% | 1.3% | 2.2% | -0.8% |
| Coincident | 0.3% | 0.1% | 2.1% | 0.4% | -0.5% | -0.5% |
| Lagging | 0.2% | 0.1% | 1.9% | -2.2% | -2.8% | -1.4% |